56 datasets found
  1. Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 14, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2025). Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site and Vicinity, Colorado (NPS, GRD, GRI, BEOL, BOFS digital map) adapted from a Colorado State University unpublished map by Linn (1999) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-surficial-geologic-gis-map-of-bents-old-fort-national-historic-site-and-vicinity-c
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 14, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
    Area covered
    Colorado
    Description

    The Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site, Colorado is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (beol_surficial_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (beol_surficial_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (beol_surficial_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (beol_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (beol_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (beol_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the beol_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Colorado State University. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (beol_surficial_geology_metadata.txt or beol_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

  2. a

    CSU 1950 Update Magenta

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 25, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2016). CSU 1950 Update Magenta [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/CSUrams::csu-1950-update-magenta/explore?path=
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    CSU 1950 Aerial Magenta

  3. a

    CSU 1941 Update Yellow

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 25, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2016). CSU 1941 Update Yellow [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/CSUrams::csu-1941-update-yellow-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    CSU 1941 Update Yellow

  4. BLM Colorado River Valley Field Office CSU 3-Intermittent and Ephemeral...

    • data.doi.gov
    • data.wu.ac.at
    Updated Mar 17, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bureau of Land Management (2021). BLM Colorado River Valley Field Office CSU 3-Intermittent and Ephemeral Streams [Dataset]. https://data.doi.gov/dataset/blm-colorado-river-valley-field-office-csu-3-intermittent-and-ephemeral-streams
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 17, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Bureau of Land Managementhttp://www.blm.gov/
    Area covered
    Colorado River
    Description

    CSU for Intermittent and Ephemeral Streams in the CRVFO. 1:24,000 scale GIS dataset containing hydrographic features for Colorado and Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) aquatic management codes.

  5. a

    INEGI DEM

    • geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 10, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2021). INEGI DEM [Dataset]. https://geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/inegi-dem-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 10, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    This data was downloaded by Tara Atwood, Intern, Geospatial Centroid, on 3/19/2021 from INEGI. This data is part of an effort to provide base-level spatial data for the Todos Santos region via ArcGIS Hub for CSU researchers and others doing work in this area. The original name for this layer is 702825736897_b. The link to the original source is here: http://en.www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=702825736897

  6. Covertype Data CSV

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Apr 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Aashish (2025). Covertype Data CSV [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/aashish31476/covertype-dataset/code
    Explore at:
    zip(23429808 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 11, 2025
    Authors
    Aashish
    Description

    The Forest CoverType dataset

    1. Title of Database:

      Forest Covertype data

    2. Sources:

      (a) Original owners of database: Remote Sensing and GIS Program Department of Forest Sciences College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 (contact Jock A. Blackard, jblackard 'at' fs.fed.us or Dr. Denis J. Dean, denis.dean 'at' utdallas.edu)

      NOTE: Reuse of this database is unlimited with retention of copyright notice for Jock A. Blackard and Colorado State University.

      (b) Donors of database: Jock A. Blackard (jblackard 'at' fs.fed.us) GIS Coordinator USFS - Forest Inventory & Analysis Rocky Mountain Research Station 507 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401

      Dr. Denis J. Dean (denis.dean 'at' utdallas.edu)
      Professor
      Program in Geography and Geospatial Sciences
      School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences
      800 West Campbell Rd
      Richardson, TX 75080-3021 
      
      Dr. Charles W. Anderson (anderson 'at' cs.colostate.edu)
      Associate Professor
      Department of Computer Science
      Colorado State University
      Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA
      

      (c) Date donated: August 1998

    3. Past Usage:

      Blackard, Jock A. and Denis J. Dean. 2000. "Comparative Accuracies of Artificial Neural Networks and Discriminant Analysis in Predicting Forest Cover Types from Cartographic Variables." Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 24(3):131-151.

      Blackard, Jock A. and Denis J. Dean. 1998. "Comparative Accuracies of Neural Networks and Discriminant Analysis in Predicting Forest Cover Types from Cartographic Variables." Second Southern Forestry GIS Conference. University of Georgia. Athens, GA. Pages 189-199.

      Blackard, Jock A. 1998. "Comparison of Neural Networks and Discriminant Analysis in Predicting Forest Cover Types." Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Forest Sciences.
      Colorado State University. Fort Collins, Colorado.
      165 pages.

      Abstract of dissertation: Natural resource managers responsible for developing ecosystem management strategies require basic descriptive information including inventory data for forested lands to support their decision-making processes. However, managers generally do not have this type of data for inholdings or neighboring lands that are outside their immediate jurisdiction. One method of obtaining this information is through the use of predictive models.
      Two predictive models were examined in this study, a feedforward neural network model and a more traditional statistical model based on discriminant analysis. The overall objectives of this research were to first construct these two predictive models, and second to compare and evaluate their respective classification accuracies when predicting forest cover types in undisturbed forests.
      The study area included four wilderness areas found in the Roosevelt National Forest of northern Colorado. A total of twelve cartographic measures were utilized as independent variables in the predictive models, while seven major forest cover types were used as dependent variables. Several subsets of these variables were examined to determine the best overall predictive model.
      For each subset of cartographic variables examined in this study, relative classification accuracies indicate the neural network approach outperformed the traditional discriminant analysis method in predicting forest cover types.
      The final neural network model had a higher absolute classification accuracy (70.58%) than the final corresponding linear discriminant analysis model(58.38%). In support of these classification results, thirty additional networks with randomly selected initial weights were derived. From these networks, the overall mean absolute classification accuracy for the neural network method was 70.52%, with a 95% confidence interval of 70.26% to 70.80%. Consequently, natural resource managers may utilize an alternative method of predicting forest cover types that is both superior to the traditional statistical methods and adequate to support their decision-making processes for developing ecosystem management strategies.

      -- Classification performance -- first 11,340 records used for training data subset -- next 3,780 records used for validation data subset -- last 565,892 records used for testing data subset -- 70% Neural Network (backpropagation) -- 58% Linear Discriminant Analysis

    4. Relevant Information Paragraph:

      Predicting forest cover type from cartographic variables only (no remotely sensed data). The actual forest cover type for a given observation (30 x 30 meter cell) was determined from US Forest Service (USFS) Region 2 Resource Information System (RIS) data. Independent variables were derived from data originally obtained from US Geological Surve...

  7. u

    Data from: SGS-LTER GIS layer of Level 2 Soil Survey and Related Document on...

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • search.dataone.org
    • +3more
    bin
    Updated Nov 30, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicole Kaplan (2023). SGS-LTER GIS layer of Level 2 Soil Survey and Related Document on Central Plains Experimental Range, Nunn, Colorado, USA 2012 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/d41d842b5249e6aa4573d8b4139ec714
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Colorado State University
    Authors
    Nicole Kaplan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Nunn, Colorado, United States
    Description

    This data package was produced by researchers working on the Shortgrass Steppe Long Term Ecological Research (SGS-LTER) Project, administered at Colorado State University. Long-term datasets and background information (proposals, reports, photographs, etc.) on the SGS-LTER project are contained in a comprehensive project collection within the Digital Collections of Colorado (http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/R/?func=collections&collection_id=3429). The data table and associated metadata document, which is generated in Ecological Metadata Language, may be available through other repositories serving the ecological research community and represent components of the larger SGS-LTER project collection. No Abstract Available Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Website Pointer to html file. File Name: Web Page, url: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?scope=knb-lter-sgs&identifier=806 Webpage with information and links to data files for download

  8. Vegetation - Great Valley Ecoregion [ds2632]

    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • data.ca.gov
    • +5more
    Updated Jul 18, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2022). Vegetation - Great Valley Ecoregion [ds2632] [Dataset]. https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/vegetation-great-valley-ecoregion-ds2632
    Explore at:
    geojson, html, arcgis geoservices rest api, zip, csv, kmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Geodatabase feature class containing a map of vegetation within the Great Valley Ecoregion produced by the Geographical Information Center (GIC) at CSU Chico. The dataset combines both new mapping and the previously completed Central Valley Riparian and Sacramento Valley and the Southern San Joaquin Valley vegetation maps. Vegetation polygons were manually digitized as interpreted using the National Agricultural Inventory Program's (NAIP) 2009 (Central Valley Riparian and Sacramento Valley map), 2012 (Southern San Joaquin Valley map) and 2014 (balance of San Joaquin Valley) aerial imagery at a scale of 1:2000. The minimum mapping unit (mmu) for natural vegetation is 1.0 acre, with a minimum average width of 10 meters. The mmu for agricultural and urban polygons is 10 acres. Vegetation is attributed to the Group and Alliance level of the state and national vegetation hierarchy. In some cases, polygons were attributed only to Group or Macrogroup level when the Alliance could not be determined from photointerpretation. The map classification is based on the key to vegetation types in Buck-Diaz et al. 2012. The Central Valley and Sacramento Valley maps were assessed for Accuracy with an average users’ accuracy of 90.2 percent and users’ accuracy of 89 percent. The San Joaquin Valley portion of the map was field verified by the mappers but was not otherwise assessed for accuracy (see Supplemental Information below for details). More information can be found in the project report, which is bundled with the vegetation map published for BIOS here: https://filelib.wildlife.ca.gov/Public/BDB/GIS/BIOS/Public_Datasets/2600_2699/ds2632.zip" STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">https://filelib.wildlife.ca.gov/Public/BDB/GIS/BIOS/Public_Datasets/2600_2699/ds2632.zip.

  9. c

    Vegetation - Modoc Plateau - Devil's Garden, Adin Mountains, Jess Valley...

    • map.dfg.ca.gov
    Updated Feb 8, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2021). Vegetation - Modoc Plateau - Devil's Garden, Adin Mountains, Jess Valley [ds2910] GIS Dataset [Dataset]. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/ds2910.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 8, 2021
    Area covered
    Modoc County, Modoc Plateau
    Description

    CDFW BIOS GIS Dataset, Contact: VegCAMP Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, Description: CSU Chicos Geographical Information Center (GIC), with assistance from CDFWs Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP) created a fine-scale vegetation and land use map of portions of the Modoc Plateau in California. The map follows the National Vegetation Mapping Classification standards as well A Manual of California Vegetation and covers the eco-region subsections Devils Garden and Adin Mountains.

  10. u

    Data from: SGS-LTER GIS layer with detailed information on Elevation...

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • search.dataone.org
    • +2more
    bin
    Updated Nov 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicole Kaplan (2025). SGS-LTER GIS layer with detailed information on Elevation Contours on Central Plains Experimental Range, Nunn, Colorado, USA 2012 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/41c4143107dec81cc599dbfc5bcdfb7f
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Colorado State University
    Authors
    Nicole Kaplan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Nunn, Colorado, United States
    Description

    This data package was produced by researchers working on the Shortgrass Steppe Long Term Ecological Research (SGS-LTER) Project, administered at Colorado State University. Long-term datasets and background information (proposals, reports, photographs, etc.) on the SGS-LTER project are contained in a comprehensive project collection within the Digital Collections of Colorado (http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/R/?func=collections&collection_id=3429). The data table and associated metadata document, which is generated in Ecological Metadata Language, may be available through other repositories serving the ecological research community and represent components of the larger SGS-LTER project collection. No Abstract Available Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Website Pointer to html file. File Name: Web Page, url: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?scope=knb-lter-sgs&identifier=502 Webpage with information and links to data files for download

  11. a

    Hillshade Todos Santos

    • geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 13, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2021). Hillshade Todos Santos [Dataset]. https://geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/hillshade-todos-santos
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 13, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    This hillshade layer was created by Tara Atwood, Intern, Geospatial Centroid, on 3/30/2021. This data is part of an effort to provide base-level spatial data for the Todos Santos region via ArcGIS Hub for CSU researchers and others doing work in this area. The link to the original source of the DEM used is here: http://en.www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=702825736897

  12. c

    Vegetation - Modoc Plateau Likely, Shinn, and Snowstorm Mountain Areas -...

    • map.dfg.ca.gov
    Updated Apr 12, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Vegetation - Modoc Plateau Likely, Shinn, and Snowstorm Mountain Areas - 2020 [ds2877] GIS Dataset [Dataset]. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/metadata/ds2877.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 12, 2022
    Area covered
    Modoc County, Modoc Plateau
    Description

    CDFW BIOS GIS Dataset, Contact: VegCAMP Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, Description: CSU Chico Geographical Information Center (GIC), with assistance from CDFWs Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP) created a fine-scale vegetation and land use map of portions of the Modoc Plateau in California. This map covers approximately 1,945,674 acres in eastern Lassen and southern Modoc Counties. It was produced using a base of true-color 2016 one-meter National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery.

  13. a

    Slope Todos Santos

    • geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 13, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2021). Slope Todos Santos [Dataset]. https://geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/slope-todos-santos
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 13, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    This slope layer was created by Tara Atwood, Intern, Geospatial Centroid, on 3/30/2021. This data is part of an effort to provide base-level spatial data for the Todos Santos region via ArcGIS Hub for CSU researchers and others doing work in this area. The link to the original source of the DEM used is here: http://en.www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=702825736897

  14. u

    SGS-LTER GIS layer with detailed information on pasture boundaries on...

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • portal.edirepository.org
    • +2more
    bin
    Updated Nov 21, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicole Kaplan (2025). SGS-LTER GIS layer with detailed information on pasture boundaries on Central Plains Experimental Range, Nunn, Colorado, USA 2012 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/ebf61bf206d92179ecd0b07bd547b0b8
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Colorado State University
    Authors
    Nicole Kaplan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Nunn, United States, Colorado
    Description

    This data package was produced by researchers working on the Shortgrass Steppe Long Term Ecological Research (SGS-LTER) Project, administered at Colorado State University. Long-term datasets and background information (proposals, reports, photographs, etc.) on the SGS-LTER project are contained in a comprehensive project collection within the Digital Collections of Colorado (http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/R/?func=collections&collection_id=3429). The data table and associated metadata document, which is generated in Ecological Metadata Language, may be available through other repositories serving the ecological research community and represent components of the larger SGS-LTER project collection. No Abstract Available Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Website Pointer to html file. File Name: Web Page, url: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?scope=knb-lter-sgs&identifier=803 Webpage with information and links to data files for download

  15. a

    Todos Santos roads

    • geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 13, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2021). Todos Santos roads [Dataset]. https://geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/todos-santos-roads
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 13, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    This data was downloaded by Tara Atwood, Intern, Geospatial Centroid, on 3/19/2021 from Berkeley Library GeoData . This data is part of an effort to provide base-level spatial data for the Todos Santos region via ArcGIS Hub for CSU researchers and others doing work in this area. The original name for this layer is nyu_2451_36786. The link to the original source is here: https://geodata.lib.berkeley.edu/catalog/nyu-2451-36786

  16. Forest Cover Type Dataset

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Nov 3, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UCI Machine Learning (2016). Forest Cover Type Dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/forest-cover-type-dataset
    Explore at:
    zip(11721892 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 3, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    UCI Machine Learning
    Description

    Context

    This dataset contains tree observations from four areas of the Roosevelt National Forest in Colorado. All observations are cartographic variables (no remote sensing) from 30 meter x 30 meter sections of forest. There are over half a million measurements total!

    Content

    This dataset includes information on tree type, shadow coverage, distance to nearby landmarks (roads etcetera), soil type, and local topography.

    Acknowledgement

    This dataset is part of the UCI Machine Learning Repository, and the original source can be found here. The original database owners are Jock A. Blackard, Dr. Denis J. Dean, and Dr. Charles W. Anderson of the Remote Sensing and GIS Program at Colorado State University.

    Inspiration

    • Can you build a model that predicts what types of trees grow in an area based on the surrounding characteristics? A past Kaggle competition project on this topic can be found here.
    • What kinds of trees are most common in the Roosevelt National Forest?
    • Which tree types can grow in more diverse environments? Are there certain tree types that are sensitive to an environmental factor, such as elevation or soil type?
  17. a

    CSU 1969 Aerial

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 6, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2016). CSU 1969 Aerial [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/content/c7521e298e5d43efb75786c3a1197462
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 6, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    CSU Sanborn 1918

  18. a

    CSU Mountain Campus boundary PingreePark

    • geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 10, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2020). CSU Mountain Campus boundary PingreePark [Dataset]. https://geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/csu-mountain-campus-boundary-pingreepark
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    Coordinates for the Pingree Park USGS topographic quadrangle and the 8 surrounding quadrangles was used to create this polygon.

  19. a

    BT NHDArea

    • geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 10, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colorado State University (2020). BT NHDArea [Dataset]. https://geospatialcentroid-csurams.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/bt-nhdarea-2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Colorado State University
    Area covered
    Description

    This zipped file geodatabase contains all vector layers available for the Big Thompson Watershed in the CSU Geospatial Centroid data sharing website. The following layers represent available data in the following themes:- Climate- Land Use- Land Cover- Hydrology- Roads- Infrastructure- Oil/Gas- CensusSee metadata for each layer for data source, use, and other metadata information.

  20. i17 Delta Levees Stationing

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Jul 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Water Resources (2025). i17 Delta Levees Stationing [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/i17-delta-levees-stationing-02747
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    California Department of Water Resourceshttp://www.water.ca.gov/
    Description

    Levee stations, usually in feet but in some cases miles, snapped to 2017 Delta levee centerlines (derived from the 2017 Delta LiDAR). Base source for station locations are surveyed field markers on the levees or distance-derived CAD files, in either case as supplied by local maintaining agency's engineers. DWR collected station location data and snapped the stations into the levee centerline file from 2012. After updated levee centerlines were created, the existing points were snapped to the new lines. So there is some small difference between the supplied station locations, previous station locations and these station locations. In some cases, multiple series of stations exist for a district, generally associated with distinct waterways. Also, district levees may be demarked in feet or in miles. The label fields are simply cartographic support, the label data are identical in all cases, but are provided to support fast labeling at more infrequent intervals as needed. Stationing is not as simple as it may seem. In some cases, multiple sets of stationing exist for a district's levees (see Sherman Island for example). What this dataset intends to represent is the current stationing used by District engineers for that District on levee maintenance and improvement projects. As changes are made to the stationing, and the new stationing data become available to the Levee Program, they will be added to this database. Some islands also have separate groups of stations for various parts of the district. This version is current as of 03/24/2020. Source of the original levee stationing is DWR Delta Levees Program, compiled from data provided by internal files, from CSU Chico State, MBK Engineers, KSN Engineers, Siegfried Engineers, Malani & Associates, Green Mountain Engineers, and DCC Engineers. Processing work done by CA DWR, Division of Engineering, Geodetic Branch, Geospatial Data Support Section, specifically by Arina Ushakova (Research Data Analyst I), and initial QC by Joel Dudas (Senior Engineer, Water Resources).

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
National Park Service (2025). Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site and Vicinity, Colorado (NPS, GRD, GRI, BEOL, BOFS digital map) adapted from a Colorado State University unpublished map by Linn (1999) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-surficial-geologic-gis-map-of-bents-old-fort-national-historic-site-and-vicinity-c
Organization logo

Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site and Vicinity, Colorado (NPS, GRD, GRI, BEOL, BOFS digital map) adapted from a Colorado State University unpublished map by Linn (1999)

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Nov 14, 2025
Dataset provided by
National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
Area covered
Colorado
Description

The Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site, Colorado is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (beol_surficial_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (beol_surficial_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (beol_surficial_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (beol_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (beol_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (beol_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the beol_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Colorado State University. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (beol_surficial_geology_metadata.txt or beol_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu