English Valid Words

This repository contains CSV files with valid English words along with their frequency, stem, and stem valid probability. Dataset Github link: https://github.com/Maximax67/English-Valid-Words

  Files included

valid_words_sorted_alphabetically.csv:

N: Counter for each word entry. Word: The English word itself. Frequency count: The number of occurrences of the word in the 1-grams dataset. Stem: The stem of the word. Stem valid probability: Probability… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Maximax67/English-Valid-Words.

Morphemic Segmentation of English Words

A Dataset of english words and morphemic segmentations

About this dataset

This dataset was collected in order to provide detailed information about the morphemic structure of English words. Morphemes are the smallest units of meaning in a language, and English words are made up of one or more morphemes. This dataset contains four different csv files, each one containing data about a different aspect of English words:

• The file lookup.csv contains a list of all the words in the dataset, along with their corresponding frequencies
• The file prefixes.csv contains a list of common English prefixes
• The file suffixes.csv contains a list of suffixes used in English words, along with their frequency
• The file vocabulary.csv contains a list of all the words in the English language, as well as their frequency of use

How to use the dataset

• lookup.csv: Contains a list of every word in the dataset, as well as their corresponding frequencies
• prefixes.csv: This file contains a list of common English prefixes
• suffixes.csv: This file contains a list of suffixes used in English words, along with their frequency
• vocabulary.csv: The file contains a list of all the words in the English language, as well as their frequency of use
• words.csv: The file contains a list of English words and their corresponding frequencies

Research Ideas

• Find most common prefixes/suffixes of English words
• Find most frequent words in the English language
• Segment English words into their morphemic components

LScDC Word-Category RIG MatrixApril 2020 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk / suzenneslihan@hotmail.com)Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny MirkesGetting StartedThis file describes the Word-Category RIG Matrix for theLeicester Scientific Corpus (LSC) [1], the procedure to build the matrix and introduces the Leicester Scientific Thesaurus (LScT) with the construction process. The Word-Category RIG Matrix is a 103,998 by 252 matrix, where rows correspond to words of Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core (LScDC) [2] and columns correspond to 252 Web of Science (WoS) categories [3, 4, 5]. Each entry in the matrix corresponds to a pair (category,word). Its value for the pair shows the Relative Information Gain (RIG) on the belonging of a text from the LSC to the category from observing the word in this text. The CSV file of Word-Category RIG Matrix in the published archive is presented with two additional columns of the sum of RIGs in categories and the maximum of RIGs over categories (last two columns of the matrix). So, the file ‘Word-Category RIG Matrix.csv’ contains a total of 254 columns.This matrix is created to be used in future research on quantifying of meaning in scientific texts under the assumption that words have scientifically specific meanings in subject categories and the meaning can be estimated by information gains from word to categories. LScT (Leicester Scientific Thesaurus) is a scientific thesaurus of English. The thesaurus includes a list of 5,000 words from the LScDC. We consider ordering the words of LScDC by the sum of their RIGs in categories. That is, words are arranged in their informativeness in the scientific corpus LSC. Therefore, meaningfulness of words evaluated by words’ average informativeness in the categories. We have decided to include the most informative 5,000 words in the scientific thesaurus. Words as a Vector of Frequencies in WoS CategoriesEach word of the LScDC is represented as a vector of frequencies in WoS categories. Given the collection of the LSC texts, each entry of the vector consists of the number of texts containing the word in the corresponding category.It is noteworthy that texts in a corpus do not necessarily belong to a single category, as they are likely to correspond to multidisciplinary studies, specifically in a corpus of scientific texts. In other words, categories may not be exclusive. There are 252 WoS categories and a text can be assigned to at least 1 and at most 6 categories in the LSC. Using the binary calculation of frequencies, we introduce the presence of a word in a category. We create a vector of frequencies for each word, where dimensions are categories in the corpus.The collection of vectors, with all words and categories in the entire corpus, can be shown in a table, where each entry corresponds to a pair (word,category). This table is build for the LScDC with 252 WoS categories and presented in published archive with this file. The value of each entry in the table shows how many times a word of LScDC appears in a WoS category. The occurrence of a word in a category is determined by counting the number of the LSC texts containing the word in a category. Words as a Vector of Relative Information Gains Extracted for CategoriesIn this section, we introduce our approach to representation of a word as a vector of relative information gains for categories under the assumption that meaning of a word can be quantified by their information gained for categories.For each category, a function is defined on texts that takes the value 1, if the text belongs to the category, and 0 otherwise. For each word, a function is defined on texts that takes the value 1 if the word belongs to the text, and 0 otherwise. Consider LSC as a probabilistic sample space (the space of equally probable elementary outcomes). For the Boolean random variables, the joint probability distribution, the entropy and information gains are defined.The information gain about the category from the word is the amount of information on the belonging of a text from the LSC to the category from observing the word in the text [6]. We used the Relative Information Gain (RIG) providing a normalised measure of the Information Gain. This provides the ability of comparing information gains for different categories. The calculations of entropy, Information Gains and Relative Information Gains can be found in the README file in the archive published. Given a word, we created a vector where each component of the vector corresponds to a category. Therefore, each word is represented as a vector of relative information gains. It is obvious that the dimension of vector for each word is the number of categories. The set of vectors is used to form the Word-Category RIG Matrix, in which each column corresponds to a category, each row corresponds to a word and each component is the relative information gain from the word to the category. In Word-Category RIG Matrix, a row vector represents the corresponding word as a vector of RIGs in categories. We note that in the matrix, a column vector represents RIGs of all words in an individual category. If we choose an arbitrary category, words can be ordered by their RIGs from the most informative to the least informative for the category. As well as ordering words in each category, words can be ordered by two criteria: sum and maximum of RIGs in categories. The top n words in this list can be considered as the most informative words in the scientific texts. For a given word, the sum and maximum of RIGs are calculated from the Word-Category RIG Matrix.RIGs for each word of LScDC in 252 categories are calculated and vectors of words are formed. We then form the Word-Category RIG Matrix for the LSC. For each word, the sum (S) and maximum (M) of RIGs in categories are calculated and added at the end of the matrix (last two columns of the matrix). The Word-Category RIG Matrix for the LScDC with 252 categories, the sum of RIGs in categories and the maximum of RIGs over categories can be found in the database.Leicester Scientific Thesaurus (LScT)Leicester Scientific Thesaurus (LScT) is a list of 5,000 words form the LScDC [2]. Words of LScDC are sorted in descending order by the sum (S) of RIGs in categories and the top 5,000 words are selected to be included in the LScT. We consider these 5,000 words as the most meaningful words in the scientific corpus. In other words, meaningfulness of words evaluated by words’ average informativeness in the categories and the list of these words are considered as a ‘thesaurus’ for science. The LScT with value of sum can be found as CSV file with the published archive. Published archive contains following files:1) Word_Category_RIG_Matrix.csv: A 103,998 by 254 matrix where columns are 252 WoS categories, the sum (S) and the maximum (M) of RIGs in categories (last two columns of the matrix), and rows are words of LScDC. Each entry in the first 252 columns is RIG from the word to the category. Words are ordered as in the LScDC.2) Word_Category_Frequency_Matrix.csv: A 103,998 by 252 matrix where columns are 252 WoS categories and rows are words of LScDC. Each entry of the matrix is the number of texts containing the word in the corresponding category. Words are ordered as in the LScDC.3) LScT.csv: List of words of LScT with sum (S) values. 4) Text_No_in_Cat.csv: The number of texts in categories. 5) Categories_in_Documents.csv: List of WoS categories for each document of the LSC.6) README.txt: Description of Word-Category RIG Matrix, Word-Category Frequency Matrix and LScT and forming procedures.7) README.pdf (same as 6 in PDF format)References[1] Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v2[2] Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LScDC (Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9896579.v3[3] Web of Science. (15 July). Available: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/[4] WoS Subject Categories. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS56B5/help/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.html [5] Suzen, N., Mirkes, E. M., & Gorban, A. N. (2019). LScDC-new large scientific dictionary. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.06858. [6] Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell system technical journal, 27(3), 379-423.

Aknowledgements

• The dataset is built with highly similar rules of "Google Isolated Sign Language Competition"-s dataset's format. This competition highlighted the research gap and the importance of creating more datasets and tools to interpret Sign Languages around the world.
• Nicholas Renotte's youtube channel and his working examples showed basic principles and amazing tools that can be used for further explorations in the research field.
• Creation of datasets and further gesture-recognition attempts would be impossible without MediaPipe's solutions.

Dataset Collection

The dataset is collected using LandmarksCollect-android app that generates CSV-files with By the time of publication of this dataset, the app uses Hands-, Facemesh- and Pose- landmarks detection solutions for Android, since the release of Holistic approach is yet to be expected in the nearest future. Using these 3 models separately is only adding excessive landmarks, thus can be omitted when not needed.

Files

Each directory is named after a phrase or a word that files in it are presenting. Do not pay attention to files' names inside a directory. The name of the directory represents the phrase or a word that containing file depicts.

The landmarks were extracted from camera-flows on Android Devices. Not all of the frames necessarily had visible hands or hands that could be detected by the model.

• frame - The frame number in the raw video.
• row_id - A unique identifier for the row.
• type - The type of landmark. One of ['face', 'left_hand', 'pose', 'right_hand'].
• landmark_index - The landmark index number. Details of the hand landmark locations can be found here.
• [x/y/z] - The normalized spatial coordinates of the landmark. These are the only columns that will be provided to your submitted model for inference. The MediaPipe model is not fully trained to predict depth so you may wish to ignore the z values.

LandmarksCollect App

Feel free to use LandmarksCollect-Android-App to collect your own datasets in the form of CSV files on whatever motions, gestures, and other human-body related research fields. New issues and pull requests in the repository are welcomed.

The LScDC (Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core Dictionary)April 2020 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk/suzenneslihan@hotmail.com)Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny Mirkes[Version 3] The third version of LScDC (Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core) is formed using the updated LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary) - Version 3*. All steps applied to build the new version of core dictionary are the same as in Version 2** and can be found in description of Version 2 below. We did not repeat the explanation. The files provided with this description are also same as described as for LScDC Version 2. The numbers of words in the 3rd versions of LScD and LScDC are summarized below. # of wordsLScD (v3) 972,060LScDC (v3) 103,998 * Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9746900.v3 ** Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LScDC (Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9896579.v2[Version 2] Getting StartedThis file describes a sorted and cleaned list of words from LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary), explains steps for sub-setting the LScD and basic statistics of words in the LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus), to be found in [1, 2]. The LScDC (Leicester Scientific Dictionary-Core) is a list of words ordered by the number of documents containing the words, and is available in the CSV file published. There are 104,223 unique words (lemmas) in the LScDC. This dictionary is created to be used in future work on the quantification of the sense of research texts. The objective of sub-setting the LScD is to discard words which appear too rarely in the corpus. In text mining algorithms, usage of enormous number of text data brings the challenge to the performance and the accuracy of data mining applications. The performance and the accuracy of models are heavily depend on the type of words (such as stop words and content words) and the number of words in the corpus. Rare occurrence of words in a collection is not useful in discriminating texts in large corpora as rare words are likely to be non-informative signals (or noise) and redundant in the collection of texts. The selection of relevant words also holds out the possibility of more effective and faster operation of text mining algorithms.To build the LScDC, we decided the following process on LScD: removing words that appear in no more than 10 documents (

Context

This is a list of most used 3200+ words, categorized by their Parts of speech. In the folder they are separated by files; containing one word per line in the text files.

https://hcnj.clubs.harvard.edu/images/vault/398.jpg" alt="Words - Parts of Speech">

Content

• description.csv file containing counts
• a folder containing all words in separate file named by part of speech.

GitHub Project

• Data Collection : GitHub

Download

• kaggle API Command `!kaggle datasets download -d azminetoushikwasi/parts-of-speech-collection-2022

Disclaimer

• The data collected are all publicly available and it's intended for educational purposes only.

Acknowledgement

• Cover image taken from internet (Harvard Club of New Jersey)

Appreciate, Support, Share

This file describes the corpus in a CSV format using pipe character as separator. The file includes the following columns:- en: The words in English that composes the sentence;- pt_br: The words in Portuguese that composes the sentence;- type: The type of the sentence (OBJ for objective and SUBJ for subjective);- pol: The polarity of the sentence if it is a subjective sentence (-1, 0 or 1).- en_path: The path in OpenSubtitles related to the sentence in English;- pt_br_path: The path in OpenSubtitles related to the sentence in Portuguese;

Context

This is the biggest word list online that I know of called the "The RIDiculouslY Huge English Wordlist" (RIDYHEW) by Chris Street.

Content

Each of the more than 457K words I have put in a CSV file, and provided the character count for each word, plus a link for each word that goes to a definition online (if a definition exists, it will be on the site I'm using), plus a link for each word that goes to Crossword Clues (if any clues exist that can be used in a crossword puzzle, it will be here on the site I'm using for that).

Acknowledgements

This was created by Chris Street and is an ongoing project. He does have some usage rules, which you can read about on his site here, plus I've included the actual documentation with this download for Kaggle.

Title: Text-Analysis Dataset with Stopwords, Positive Words, and Negative Words

Description: This dataset is designed for text analysis tasks and contains three types of words: stopwords, positive words, and negative words. Stopwords are common words that are typically removed from text during preprocessing because they don't carry much meaning, such as "the," "and," "a," etc. Positive words are words that convey a positive sentiment, while negative words are words that convey a negative sentiment.

The stopwords were obtained from a standard list used in natural language processing, while the positive and negative words were obtained from publicly available sentiment lexicons.

Each word is provided as a separate entry in the dataset.

The dataset is provided in CSV format and is suitable for use in various text analysis tasks, such as sentiment analysis, text classification, and natural language processing.

Columns: All the csvs contain a single column having the specified set of words.

EG: positive-words.txt a+ abound abounds abundance abundant accessable accessible acclaim acclaimed acclamation accolade accolades accommodative . . . and so on

This dataset can be used to build models that can automatically classify text as positive or negative, or to identify which words are likely to carry more meaning in a given text.

This dataset comprises 10,000 English words, each labeled according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) levels. CEFR is a language learning standard that classifies language skills into six different levels (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2). This dataset serves as a valuable resource for English language learning and teaching. The CEFR level of each word guides learners on which words to focus on while enhancing their language skills. This compilation can be used for various purposes such as classifying words by English proficiency level, creating language learning materials, preparing language tests, and conducting language education research.

The .csv file includes more than 800,000 French words (with their spelling variations, plurals, etc.) as well as their definitions, also in French.

Some brief information about the dataset : - The .csv file was created from the parsing of an XML file and cleaned of some missing definitions as explained below - Each word can have several definitions, these have been placed in lists so that they can be easily browsed by a Python script - The words present in this .csv file are not sorted in alphabetical order - The dataset only contains words and their definitions. Examples of use, the phonetics as well as the translations into foreign languages are not included.

Simple CSV containing English words. Derived from another HuggingFace dataset.

The data is obtained by scraping the cdep.ro website and contains 500k+ instances of speech from the parliament podium from 1996 to 2019. (Up to 2001 only the Chamber of Deputies published transcripts, after jan. 2001 Senate data is also included.)

Columns:

'index' - incremented integer as row number in order of scraping

'title', - title of the scraped page, usually contains the name of the chamber and the exact data

'name', - the name of the speaker, preappended with Mr. or Mrs.

'speech', - the content of the speech,

'gender', - the gender of the speaker

'url' - the url to the profile of the speaker (useful for extending the data)

CDEPs2.csv - Contains all transcripts, prone to parsing errors. 100% of data.

validated-1.csv - Consists of 99% of original data. Less than 1% dropped for convenience. Ready to use.

The Canada Trademarks Dataset

18 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 908 (2021), prepublication draft available at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3782655, published version available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/author/CHG3HC6GTFMMRU8UJFRR?target=10.1111/jels.12303

Dataset Selection and Arrangement (c) 2021 Jeremy Sheff

Python and Stata Scripts (c) 2021 Jeremy Sheff

Contains data licensed by Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Industry, the minister responsible for the administration of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office.

This individual-application-level dataset includes records of all applications for registered trademarks in Canada since approximately 1980, and of many preserved applications and registrations dating back to the beginning of Canada’s trademark registry in 1865, totaling over 1.6 million application records. It includes comprehensive bibliographic and lifecycle data; trademark characteristics; goods and services claims; identification of applicants, attorneys, and other interested parties (including address data); detailed prosecution history event data; and data on application, registration, and use claims in countries other than Canada. The dataset has been constructed from public records made available by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. Both the dataset and the code used to build and analyze it are presented for public use on open-access terms.

Scripts are licensed for reuse subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY-4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Data files are licensed for reuse subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY-4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, and also subject to additional conditions imposed by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) as described below.

Terms of Use:

As per the terms of use of CIPO's government data, all users are required to include the above-quoted attribution to CIPO in any reproductions of this dataset. They are further required to cease using any record within the datasets that has been modified by CIPO and for which CIPO has issued a notice on its website in accordance with its Terms and Conditions, and to use the datasets in compliance with applicable laws. These requirements are in addition to the terms of the CC-BY-4.0 license, which require attribution to the author (among other terms). For further information on CIPO’s terms and conditions, see https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr01935.html. For further information on the CC-BY-4.0 license, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The following attribution statement, if included by users of this dataset, is satisfactory to the author, but the author makes no representations as to whether it may be satisfactory to CIPO:

The Canada Trademarks Dataset is (c) 2021 by Jeremy Sheff and licensed under a CC-BY-4.0 license, subject to additional terms imposed by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. It contains data licensed by Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Industry, the minister responsible for the administration of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. For further information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ and https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/cipointernet-internetopic.nsf/eng/wr01935.html.

Details of Repository Contents:

This repository includes a number of .zip archives which expand into folders containing either scripts for construction and analysis of the dataset or data files comprising the dataset itself. These folders are as follows:

• /csv: contains the .csv versions of the data files
• /do: contains Stata do-files used to convert the .csv files to .dta format and perform the statistical analyses set forth in the paper reporting this dataset
• /dta: contains the .dta versions of the data files
• /py: contains the python scripts used to download CIPO’s historical trademarks data via SFTP and generate the .csv data files

If users wish to construct rather than download the datafiles, the first script that they should run is /py/sftp_secure.py. This script will prompt the user to enter their IP Horizons SFTP credentials; these can be obtained by registering with CIPO at https://ised-isde.survey-sondage.ca/f/s.aspx?s=59f3b3a4-2fb5-49a4-b064-645a5e3a752d&lang=EN&ds=SFTP. The script will also prompt the user to identify a target directory for the data downloads. Because the data archives are quite large, users are advised to create a target directory in advance and ensure they have at least 70GB of available storage on the media in which the directory is located.

The sftp_secure.py script will generate a new subfolder in the user’s target directory called /XML_raw. Users should note the full path of this directory, which they will be prompted to provide when running the remaining python scripts. Each of the remaining scripts, the filenames of which begin with “iterparse”, corresponds to one of the data files in the dataset, as indicated in the script’s filename. After running one of these scripts, the user’s target directory should include a /csv subdirectory containing the data file corresponding to the script; after running all the iterparse scripts the user’s /csv directory should be identical to the /csv directory in this repository. Users are invited to modify these scripts as they see fit, subject to the terms of the licenses set forth above.

With respect to the Stata do-files, only one of them is relevant to construction of the dataset itself. This is /do/CA_TM_csv_cleanup.do, which converts the .csv versions of the data files to .dta format, and uses Stata’s labeling functionality to reduce the size of the resulting files while preserving information. The other do-files generate the analyses and graphics presented in the paper describing the dataset (Jeremy N. Sheff, The Canada Trademarks Dataset, 18 J. Empirical Leg. Studies (forthcoming 2021)), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3782655). These do-files are also licensed for reuse subject to the terms of the CC-BY-4.0 license, and users are invited to adapt the scripts to their needs.

The python and Stata scripts included in this repository are separately maintained and updated on Github at https://github.com/jnsheff/CanadaTM.

This repository also includes a copy of the current version of CIPO's data dictionary for its historical XML trademarks archive as of the date of construction of this dataset.

The LIST corpus extraction tool is a Java program for extracting lists from text corpora on the levels of characters, word parts, words, and word sets. It supports VERT and TEI P5 XML formats and outputs .CSV files that can be imported into Microsoft Excel or similar statistical processing software.

This data set contains three word embedding models, constructed from the same training corpus of English and German parallel scientific texts (abstracts and research project descriptions). All text was pre-processed by language-specific stemming with the Porter stemming algorithm, removing numbers, and lower-casing.

The first model is a 1000-dimensional Latent Semantic Analysis model, constructed from concatenating the English and German texts. The input data was a m×n (297,852×923,864) document-term matrix of tf-idf weights. This was processed with truncated SVD. There are two files, the word vectors in file lsa_1000_Vmat.csv (the V* term by latent factors matrix of right singular values) and the dimension weights in lsa_1000_d_weights.csv (the 1000 values of the diagonal of the ΣΣ matrix.

lsa_1000_Vmat.csv has two fields, the term and its vector representation in LSA space, separated by a "|" character. The structure looks like this:

tarifplural|{5.00599733151825e-08,-1.43071379136936e-08,8.32862290483082e-08,-6.08010721687266e-08,1.15831140150142e-07,-2.46470313387358e-08,3.43215595753282e-07,6.24301666802575e-07,-2.62907158945831e-07,-1.04120313981517e-07,4.5864574355164e-07,-2.31799632277312e-07,8.37354377858843e-07,8.22507467711628e-07,4.07585381069368e-07,-4.26358988941922e-08,-8.38652991154651e-07,1.98091851171759e-07,-3.94768548759816e-08,-4.28802181962385e-07, ...}

The other two models are a basic Random Indexing and a Reflective Random Indexing model, contained in same file, RI_training.csv. Both models have 1000 dimensions. The data structure is as follows.

• language: either "en" (English) or "de" (German), the language of the term
• term: the term as a character string
• term_collection_count: integer, number of times the term occurred in the training data
• c_vector: vector of 1000 reals, RI context vector of the term. formatted like this: "{0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.12309149,0,0,-0.12309149,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, ...}"
• n_docs: integer, number of different documents which contained the term
• c_vector_o2: vector of 1000 reals, RRI context vector of the term, formatted like c_vector above

1,034,860 rows.

All files are aggressively compressed with GNU gzip and will require much more disk space when uncompressed. Note the special formatting of the vector numeric variables, which are different for the two models.

Funding was provided by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [grant numbers 01PQ16004 and 01PQ17001

A collection of datasets and python scripts for extraction and analysis of isograms (and some palindromes and tautonyms) from corpus-based word-lists, specifically Google Ngram and the British National Corpus (BNC).Below follows a brief description, first, of the included datasets and, second, of the included scripts.1. DatasetsThe data from English Google Ngrams and the BNC is available in two formats: as a plain text CSV file and as a SQLite3 database.1.1 CSV formatThe CSV files for each dataset actually come in two parts: one labelled ".csv" and one ".totals". The ".csv" contains the actual extracted data, and the ".totals" file contains some basic summary statistics about the ".csv" dataset with the same name.The CSV files contain one row per data point, with the colums separated by a single tab stop. There are no labels at the top of the files. Each line has the following columns, in this order (the labels below are what I use in the database, which has an identical structure, see section below):

Label Data type Description

isogramy int The order of isogramy, e.g. "2" is a second order isogram

length int The length of the word in letters

word text The actual word/isogram in ASCII

source_pos text The Part of Speech tag from the original corpus

count int Token count (total number of occurences)

vol_count int Volume count (number of different sources which contain the word)

count_per_million int Token count per million words

vol_count_as_percent int Volume count as percentage of the total number of volumes

is_palindrome bool Whether the word is a palindrome (1) or not (0)

is_tautonym bool Whether the word is a tautonym (1) or not (0)

The ".totals" files have a slightly different format, with one row per data point, where the first column is the label and the second column is the associated value. The ".totals" files contain the following data:

Label

Data type

Description

!total_1grams

int

The total number of words in the corpus

!total_volumes

int

The total number of volumes (individual sources) in the corpus

!total_isograms

int

The total number of isograms found in the corpus (before compacting)

!total_palindromes

int

How many of the isograms found are palindromes

!total_tautonyms

int

How many of the isograms found are tautonyms

The CSV files are mainly useful for further automated data processing. For working with the data set directly (e.g. to do statistics or cross-check entries), I would recommend using the database format described below.1.2 SQLite database formatOn the other hand, the SQLite database combines the data from all four of the plain text files, and adds various useful combinations of the two datasets, namely:• Compacted versions of each dataset, where identical headwords are combined into a single entry.• A combined compacted dataset, combining and compacting the data from both Ngrams and the BNC.• An intersected dataset, which contains only those words which are found in both the Ngrams and the BNC dataset.The intersected dataset is by far the least noisy, but is missing some real isograms, too.The columns/layout of each of the tables in the database is identical to that described for the CSV/.totals files above.To get an idea of the various ways the database can be queried for various bits of data see the R script described below, which computes statistics based on the SQLite database.2. ScriptsThere are three scripts: one for tiding Ngram and BNC word lists and extracting isograms, one to create a neat SQLite database from the output, and one to compute some basic statistics from the data. The first script can be run using Python 3, the second script can be run using SQLite 3 from the command line, and the third script can be run in R/RStudio (R version 3).2.1 Source dataThe scripts were written to work with word lists from Google Ngram and the BNC, which can be obtained from http://storage.googleapis.com/books/ngrams/books/datasetsv2.html and [https://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/bnc-readme.html], (download all.al.gz).For Ngram the script expects the path to the directory containing the various files, for BNC the direct path to the *.gz file.2.2 Data preparationBefore processing proper, the word lists need to be tidied to exclude superfluous material and some of the most obvious noise. This will also bring them into a uniform format.Tidying and reformatting can be done by running one of the following commands:python isograms.py --ngrams --indir=INDIR --outfile=OUTFILEpython isograms.py --bnc --indir=INFILE --outfile=OUTFILEReplace INDIR/INFILE with the input directory or filename and OUTFILE with the filename for the tidied and reformatted output.2.3 Isogram ExtractionAfter preparing the data as above, isograms can be extracted from by running the following command on the reformatted and tidied files:python isograms.py --batch --infile=INFILE --outfile=OUTFILEHere INFILE should refer the the output from the previosu data cleaning process. Please note that the script will actually write two output files, one named OUTFILE with a word list of all the isograms and their associated frequency data, and one named "OUTFILE.totals" with very basic summary statistics.2.4 Creating a SQLite3 databaseThe output data from the above step can be easily collated into a SQLite3 database which allows for easy querying of the data directly for specific properties. The database can be created by following these steps:1. Make sure the files with the Ngrams and BNC data are named “ngrams-isograms.csv” and “bnc-isograms.csv” respectively. (The script assumes you have both of them, if you only want to load one, just create an empty file for the other one).2. Copy the “create-database.sql” script into the same directory as the two data files.3. On the command line, go to the directory where the files and the SQL script are. 4. Type: sqlite3 isograms.db 5. This will create a database called “isograms.db”.See the section 1 for a basic descript of the output data and how to work with the database.2.5 Statistical processingThe repository includes an R script (R version 3) named “statistics.r” that computes a number of statistics about the distribution of isograms by length, frequency, contextual diversity, etc. This can be used as a starting point for running your own stats. It uses RSQLite to access the SQLite database version of the data described above.

This repository was created for my Master's thesis in Computational Intelligence and Internet of Things at the University of Córdoba, Spain. The purpose of this repository is to store the datasets found that were used in some of the studies that served as research material for this Master's thesis. Also, the datasets used in the experimental part of this work are included.

Below are the datasets specified, along with the details of their references, authors, and download sources.

----------- STS-Gold Dataset ----------------

The dataset consists of 2026 tweets. The file consists of 3 columns: id, polarity, and tweet. The three columns denote the unique id, polarity index of the text and the tweet text respectively.

Reference: Saif, H., Fernandez, M., He, Y., & Alani, H. (2013). Evaluation datasets for Twitter sentiment analysis: a survey and a new dataset, the STS-Gold.

File name: sts_gold_tweet.csv

----------- Amazon Sales Dataset ----------------

This dataset is having the data of 1K+ Amazon Product's Ratings and Reviews as per their details listed on the official website of Amazon. The data was scraped in the month of January 2023 from the Official Website of Amazon.

Owner: Karkavelraja J., Postgraduate student at Puducherry Technological University (Puducherry, Puducherry, India)

Features:

• product_id - Product ID
• product_name - Name of the Product
• category - Category of the Product
• discounted_price - Discounted Price of the Product
• actual_price - Actual Price of the Product
• discount_percentage - Percentage of Discount for the Product
• rating - Rating of the Product
• rating_count - Number of people who voted for the Amazon rating
• about_product - Description about the Product
• user_id - ID of the user who wrote review for the Product
• user_name - Name of the user who wrote review for the Product
• review_id - ID of the user review
• review_title - Short review
• review_content - Long review
• img_link - Image Link of the Product
• product_link - Official Website Link of the Product

License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

File name: amazon.csv

----------- Rotten Tomatoes Reviews Dataset ----------------

This rating inference dataset is a sentiment classification dataset, containing 5,331 positive and 5,331 negative processed sentences from Rotten Tomatoes movie reviews. On average, these reviews consist of 21 words. The first 5331 rows contains only negative samples and the last 5331 rows contain only positive samples, thus the data should be shuffled before usage.

This data is collected from https://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/pabo/movie-review-data/ as a txt file and converted into a csv file. The file consists of 2 columns: reviews and labels (1 for fresh (good) and 0 for rotten (bad)).

Reference: Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), pages 115–124, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 2005. Association for Computational Linguistics

File name: data_rt.csv

----------- Preprocessed Dataset Sentiment Analysis ----------------

Preprocessed amazon product review data of Gen3EcoDot (Alexa) scrapped entirely from amazon.in
Stemmed and lemmatized using nltk.
Sentiment labels are generated using TextBlob polarity scores.

The file consists of 4 columns: index, review (stemmed and lemmatized review using nltk), polarity (score) and division (categorical label generated using polarity score).

DOI: 10.34740/kaggle/dsv/3877817

Citation: @misc{pradeesh arumadi_2022, title={Preprocessed Dataset Sentiment Analysis}, url={https://www.kaggle.com/dsv/3877817}, DOI={10.34740/KAGGLE/DSV/3877817}, publisher={Kaggle}, author={Pradeesh Arumadi}, year={2022} }

This dataset was used in the experimental phase of my research.

File name: EcoPreprocessed.csv

----------- Amazon Earphones Reviews ----------------

This dataset consists of a 9930 Amazon reviews, star ratings, for 10 latest (as of mid-2019) bluetooth earphone devices for learning how to train Machine for sentiment analysis.

This dataset was employed in the experimental phase of my research. To align it with the objectives of my study, certain reviews were excluded from the original dataset, and an additional column was incorporated into this dataset.

The file consists of 5 columns: ReviewTitle, ReviewBody, ReviewStar, Product and division (manually added - categorical label generated using ReviewStar score)

License: U.S. Government Works

Source: www.amazon.in

File name (original): AllProductReviews.csv (contains 14337 reviews)

File name (edited - used for my research) : AllProductReviews2.csv (contains 9930 reviews)

----------- Amazon Musical Instruments Reviews ----------------

This dataset contains 7137 comments/reviews of different musical instruments coming from Amazon.

This dataset was employed in the experimental phase of my research. To align it with the objectives of my study, certain reviews were excluded from the original dataset, and an additional column was incorporated into this dataset.

The file consists of 10 columns: reviewerID, asin (ID of the product), reviewerName, helpful (helpfulness rating of the review), reviewText, overall (rating of the product), summary (summary of the review), unixReviewTime (time of the review - unix time), reviewTime (time of the review (raw) and division (manually added - categorical label generated using overall score).

Source: http://jmcauley.ucsd.edu/data/amazon/

File name (original): Musical_instruments_reviews.csv (contains 10261 reviews)

File name (edited - used for my research) : Musical_instruments_reviews2.csv (contains 7137 reviews)

"Models for diachronic lexical semantics used by the Jena Semantic Explorer (JeSemE) web site described in our COLING 2018 paper ""JeSemE: A Website for Exploring Diachronic Changes in Word Meaning and Emotion"".

Also described and applied in Johannes Hellrich's Ph.D. thesis ""Word Embeddings: Reliability & Semantic Change"" who was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the graduate school ""The Romantic Model"" (GRK 2041/1).

One ZIP file per corpus, each containing several CSV files:

CHI.csv with χ2 word association values (structure: word-id, word-id, time, value)

EMBEDDING.csv with SVD-PPMI word embeddings (aligned; structure: word-id, time, values)

EMOTION.csv with VAD word emotion values (structure: word-id, time, values)

FREQUENCY.csv with relative word frequency values (structure: word-id, time, value)

PPMI.csv with PPMI word association values (structure: word-id, word-id, time, value)

SIMILARITY.csv with word embedding derived word similarity values (structure: word-id, word-id, time, value)

WORDIDS.csv mapping words to their corpus specific IDs

Corpora are:

coha: Corpus of Historical American English

dta: Deutsches Textarchiv 'German Text Archive'

google_fiction: Google Books N-Gram corpus, English fiction subcorpus

google_german: Google Books N-Gram corpus, German subcorpus

rsc: Royal Society Corpus

"

The LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus)August 2019 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk) Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny MirkesThe data is extracted from the Web of Science® [1] You may not copy or distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of Clarivate Analytics.Getting StartedThis text provides background information on the LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) and pre-processing steps on abstracts, and describes the structure of files to organise the corpus. This corpus is created to be used in future work on the quantification of the sense of research texts. One of the goal of publishing the data is to make it available for further analysis and use in Natural Language Processing projects.LSC is a collection of abstracts of articles and proceeding papers published in 2014, and indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) database [1]. Each document contains title, list of authors, list of categories, list of research areas, and times cited. The corpus contains only documents in English.The corpus was collected in July 2018 online and contains the number of citations from publication date to July 2018.Each document in the corpus contains the following parts:1. Authors: The list of authors of the paper2. Title: The title of the paper3. Abstract: The abstract of the paper4. Categories: One or more category from the list of categories [2]. Full list of categories is presented in file ‘List_of _Categories.txt’.5. Research Areas: One or more research area from the list of research areas [3]. Full list of research areas is presented in file ‘List_of_Research_Areas.txt’.6. Total Times cited: The number of times the paper was cited by other items from all databases within Web of Science platform [4]7. Times cited in Core Collection: The total number of times the paper was cited by other papers within the WoS Core Collection [4]We describe a document as the collection of information (about a paper) listed above. The total number of documents in LSC is 1,673,824.All documents in LSC have nonempty abstract, title, categories, research areas and times cited in WoS databases. There are 119 documents with empty authors list, we did not exclude these documents.Data ProcessingThis section describes all steps in order for the LSC to be collected, clean and available to researchers. Processing the data consists of six main steps:Step 1: Downloading of the Data OnlineThis is the step of collecting the dataset online. This is done manually by exporting documents as Tab-delimitated files. All downloaded documents are available online.Step 2: Importing the Dataset to RThis is the process of converting the collection to RData format for processing the data. The LSC was collected as TXT files. All documents are extracted to R.Step 3: Cleaning the Data from Documents with Empty Abstract or without CategoryNot all papers have abstract and categories in the collection. As our research is based on the analysis of abstracts and categories, preliminary detecting and removing inaccurate documents were performed. All documents with empty abstracts and documents without categories are removed.Step 4: Identification and Correction of Concatenate Words in AbstractsTraditionally, abstracts are written in a format of executive summary with one paragraph of continuous writing, which is known as ‘unstructured abstract’. However, especially medicine-related publications use ‘structured abstracts’. Such type of abstracts are divided into sections with distinct headings such as introduction, aim, objective, method, result, conclusion etc.Used tool for extracting abstracts leads concatenate words of section headings with the first word of the section. As a result, some of structured abstracts in the LSC require additional process of correction to split such concatenate words. For instance, we observe words such as ConclusionHigher and ConclusionsRT etc. in the corpus. The detection and identification of concatenate words cannot be totally automated. Human intervention is needed in the identification of possible headings of sections. We note that we only consider concatenate words in headings of sections as it is not possible to detect all concatenate words without deep knowledge of research areas. Identification of such words is done by sampling of medicine-related publications. The section headings in such abstracts are listed in the List 1.List 1 Headings of sections identified in structured abstractsBackground Method(s) DesignTheoretical Measurement(s) LocationAim(s) Methodology ProcessAbstract Population ApproachObjective(s) Purpose(s) Subject(s)Introduction Implication(s) Patient(s)Procedure(s) Hypothesis Measure(s)Setting(s) Limitation(s) DiscussionConclusion(s) Result(s) Finding(s)Material (s) Rationale(s)Implications for health and nursing policyAll words including headings in the List 1 are detected in entire corpus, and then words are split into two words. For instance, the word ‘ConclusionHigher’ is split into ‘Conclusion’ and ‘Higher’.Step 5: Extracting (Sub-setting) the Data Based on Lengths of AbstractsAfter correction of concatenate words is completed, the lengths of abstracts are calculated. ‘Length’ indicates the totalnumber of words in the text, calculated by the same rule as for Microsoft Word ‘word count’ [5].According to APA style manual [6], an abstract should contain between 150 to 250 words. However, word limits vary from journal to journal. For instance, Journal of Vascular Surgery recommends that ‘Clinical and basic research studies must include a structured abstract of 400 words or less’[7].In LSC, the length of abstracts varies from 1 to 3805. We decided to limit length of abstracts from 30 to 500 words in order to study documents with abstracts of typical length ranges and to avoid the effect of the length to the analysis. Documents containing less than 30 and more than 500 words in abstracts are removed.Step 6: Saving the Dataset into CSV FormatCorrected and extracted documents are saved into 36 CSV files. The structure of files are described in the following section.The Structure of Fields in CSV FilesIn CSV files, the information is organised with one record on each line and parts of abstract, title, list of authors, list of categories, list of research areas, and times cited is recorded in separated fields.To access the LSC for research purposes, please email to ns433@le.ac.uk.References[1]Web of Science. (15 July). Available: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/[2]WoS Subject Categories. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS56B5/help/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.html[3]Research Areas in WoS. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca.html[4]Times Cited in WoS Core Collection. (15 July). Available: https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Web-of-Science-Times-Cited-accessibility-and-variation?language=en_US[5]Word Count. Available: https://support.office.com/en-us/article/show-word-count-3c9e6a11-a04d-43b4-977c-563a0e0d5da3[6]A. P. Association, Publication manual. American Psychological Association Washington, DC, 1983.[7]P. Gloviczki and P. F. Lawrence, "Information for authors," Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. A16-A22, 2017.