What is the Counter-Trafficking Data Collaborative?

The Counter-Trafficking Data Collaborative is the first global data hub on human trafficking, publishing harmonized data from counter-trafficking organizations around the world. Launched in November 2017, the goal of CTDC is to break down information-sharing barriers and equip the counter-trafficking community with up to date, reliable data on human trafficking.

The global victim of trafficking dataset

The CTDC global victim of trafficking dataset is the largest of its kind in the world, and currently exists in two forms. The data are based on case management data, gathered from identified cases of human trafficking, disaggregated at the level of the individual. The cases are recorded in a case management system during the provision of protection and assistance services, or are logged when individuals contact a counter-trafficking hotline. The number of observations in the dataset increases as new records are added by the contributing organizations. The global victim of trafficking dataset that is available to download from the website in csv format has been mathematically anonymized, and the complete, non k-anonymized version of the dataset is displayed throughout the website through visualizations and charts showing detailed analysis.

Where do the data come from?

The data come from a variety of sources. The data featured in the global victim of trafficking dataset come from the assistance activities of the contributing organizations, including from case management services and from counter-trafficking hotline logs.

How are the global datasets created?

Each dataset has been created through a process of comparing and harmonizing existing data models of contributing partners and data classification systems. Initial areas of compatibility were identified to create a unified system for organizing and mapping data to a single standard. Each contributing organization transforms its data to this shared standard and any identifying information is removed before the datasets are made available.

How is the individual-level data protected?

Step 1

Counter-trafficking case data contains highly sensitive information, and maintaining privacy and confidentiality is of paramount importance for CTDC. For example, all explicit identifiers, such as names, were removed from the global victim dataset and some data such as age has been transformed into age ranges. No personally identifying information is transferred to or hosted by CTDC, and organizations that want to contribute are asked to anonymize in accordance to the standards set by CTDC.

Step 2

In addition to the safeguard measures outlined in step 1 the global victim dataset has been anonymized to a higher level, through a mathematical approach called k-anonymization. For a full description of k-anonymization, please refer to the definitions page.

IOM collects and processes data in accordance to its own Data Protection Policy. The other contributors adhere to relevant national and international standards through their policies for collecting and processing personal data.

How to interpret the data?

These data reflect the victims assisted/identified/referred/reported to the contributing organizations, which may not represent all victims identified within a country. Nevertheless, the larger the sample size for a given country (or, the more victims displayed on the map for a given country), the more representative the data are likely to be of the identified victim of trafficking population.

A larger number of identified victims of trafficking does not imply that there is a larger number of undetected victims of trafficking (i.e. a higher prevalence of trafficking).

In addition, samples of identified victims of trafficking cannot be considered random samples of the wider population of victims of trafficking (which includes unidentified victims), since counter-trafficking agencies may be more likely to identify some trafficking cases rather than others. However, with this caveat in mind, the profile of identified victims of trafficking tends to be considered as indicative of the profile of the wider population, given that the availability of other data sources is close to zero.

How does human trafficking case data relate to prevalence data?

There are currently no global or regional estimates of the prevalence of human trafficking. National estimates have been conducted in a few countries but they are also based on modelling of existing administrative data from identified cases and should therefore only be considered as basic baseline estimates. Historically, producing estimates of the prevalence of trafficking based on the collection of new primary data through surveys, for example, has been difficult. This is due to trafficking’s complicated legal definition and the challenges of a...

This study was conducted to explore the effects prostitution legislation has on sex trafficking rates. This issue holds paramount importance in the fields of legal studies and human rights. By leveraging advanced machine learning techniques to analyze data from the Counter-Trafficking Data Collaborative (CTDC), encompassing 180 countries, this study aims to uncover the relationship between various prostitution legislation types and sex trafficking occurrences. The exploration begins with extensive cleaning, merging, and filtering of the CTDC dataset, integrating it with prostitution legislation data from the World Population Review. This process ensures a harmonized dataset that accurately reflects the global landscape of sex trafficking in relation to legislative frameworks. The machine learning model initially concentrated on prostitution legislation as a key variable but evolved to include a broader range of factors like registration year, population, growth rate, gender, and citizenship. This expansion was crucial in developing a more accurate and holistic model.This study offered a nuanced exploration of the impact of prostitution legislation on sex trafficking, employing sophisticated data analysis and machine learning models to parse through extensive data. The advanced RandomForestClassifier was key in the research, achieving an 87% accuracy rate for predicting instances of sex trafficking and demonstrating the need to incorporate diverse predictive features. Notably, the analysis emphasized the importance of the legislative feature in accurately predicting sex trafficking, despite the inclusion of other variables to improve overall model precision. These findings underscore the significance of a multifaceted approach, considering factors like demographics and socio-economic indicators, to gain a comprehensive understanding of sex trafficking trends.Complementing the machine learning insights, a logistic regression model scrutinized the specific effects of different legislative approaches on sex trafficking. The analysis revealed that legislative frameworks such as legalization, abolitionism, decriminalization, and neo-abolitionism have a considerable influence on reducing sex trafficking rates, suggesting their potential as effective legal strategies. Alternantively, prohibition legislation is found to corrrelate with significantly higher sex trafficking rates. These results serve as a critical resource for policymakers and advocates engaged in the development of informed, evidence-based approaches to address the global challenge of sex trafficking.

Credit report of Ctdc Pty Ltd Atf contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.

This dataset was compiled using CTDC data from 2006 to 2016. Supplementary industry sector information were added for the IOM data, based on unpublished fields.