Provides international migration data that will assist the U.S. Census Bureau, other government agencies, and other researchers to improve the quality of international migration estimates and to determine changes in migration patterns that are related to the nations population composition.

The IRS publishes migration data for the US population based upon the individual tax returns filed with the IRS, where they track on a year-by-year basis

• where people were coming from - the prior state of residency
• where people moving to - the new state of residency
• number of returns filed - approximate number of households that migrated
• number of exemptions - approximate number of individuals
• the adjusted gross income (AGI) - recorded in thousands of dollars

The raw data published on the IRS website clearly shows patterns of evolution - changing patterns of what is recorded, how it is record, and naming conventions used - making it a challenge to track changes in the underlying data over time. The current dataset attempts to address these shortcomings by normalizing the record layout, standardizing the conventions, and collecting the annual into a single, coherent dataset.

An individual record is laid out with 9 fields

Y1 Y1_STATE_FIPS Y1_STATE_ABBR Y1_STATE_NAME Y2 Y2_STATE_FIPS Y2_STATE_ABBR Y2_STATE_NAME NUM_RETURNS NUM_EXEMPTIONS AGI Here, Y1 refers to the first year (from where the people are migrating) while Y2 refers to the second year (to where the people are migrating). As this is annual data, Y2 should always be the next year after Y1. Associated with each year are three different ways of identifying a state - the name of the state, it's two-letter abbreviaion, and it's FIPS code. Granted, carrying around three IDs per state is redundant; however, the various IDs are useful in different contexts. One thing to note - the IRS data represents migration into and out of the country via the introduction of a fake state, identified by STATE_NAME=FOREIGN, STATE_ABBR=FR, and STATE_FIPS=57.

From any given state, the dataset records migration to 52 destinations

• either not moving, or staying in the same state
• migrating to one of the other 49 states
• migrating to Washington DC
• migrating overseas (i.e., to the FOREIGN state)

Similarly, the dataset represents the migation into any given state as being from one of 52 destinations. Typically, the numbers associated with "staying put" constitute, by far, the largest contingent of tax payers for the given state. The one exception to this description is the FOREIGN state. The dataset does not record "staying put" outside of the country; there is no record for FOREIGN-to-FOREIGN migration. As such, there are 51, not 52, destinations paired with migration to-and-from the FOREIGN state.

The IRS Statistics of Income Division (SOI), in collaboration with the U.S. Census Bureau, has released migration data for the United States for several decades. These data are an important source of information detailing the movement of individuals from one location to another. SOI bases these data on year-to-year address changes reported on individual income tax returns filed with the IRS. They present migration patterns by State or by county for the entire United States and are available for inflows—the number of new residents who moved to a State or county and where they migrated from, and outflows—the number of residents leaving a State or county and where they went. The data are available for Filing Years 1991 through 2016 and include:

• Number of returns filed, which approximates the number of households that migrated
• Number of personal exemptions claimed, which approximates the number of individuals
• Total adjusted gross income, starting with Filing Year 1995
• Aggregate migration flows at the State level, by the size of adjusted gross income (AGI) and age of the primary taxpayer, starting with Filing Year 2011.

This submission includes publicly available data extracted in its original form. Please reference the Related Publication listed here for source and citation information: IRS Statistics of Income (SOI) program. SOI tax stats - Migration data. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). July 29, 2024. Accessed December 17, 2024. https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-migration-data If you have questions about this metadata entry, please contact the CAFE team at climatecafe@bu.edu. Migration data for the United States are based on year-to-year address changes reported on individual income tax returns filed with the IRS. They present migration patterns by State or by county for the entire United States and are available for inflows—the number of new residents who moved to a State or county and where they migrated from, and outflows—the number of residents leaving a State or county and where they went. The data are available for Filing Years 1991 through 2022. Quote from https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-migration-data

This data collection is comprised of responses from two sets of survey questionnaires, the basic Current Population Survey (CPS) and a survey on the topic of immigration and emigration, which was administered as a supplement to the August 2008 CPS questionnaire.The CPS, administered monthly, is a labor force survey providing current estimates of the economic status and activities of the population of the United States. Specifically, the CPS provides estimates of total employment (both farm and nonfarm), nonfarm self-employed persons, domestics, and unpaid helpers in nonfarm family enterprises, wage and salaried employees, and estimates of total unemployment. Data from the CPS are provided for the week prior to the survey.The August 2008 supplement questions were asked of all household members interviewed in the basic CPS. The supplemental questions collected information on contemporary migration patterns, such as multiple years of entry to and emigration from the United States, time spent living outside the United States, and money sent and received from family and friends living outside the United States.Demographic variables include age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, marital status, veteran status, educational attainment, occupation, and income.

Family trees contain information on individuals such as birth and death places and years, and kinship ties, e.g., parent-child, spouse, and sibling relationships. Such information makes it possible to construct population-scale trees and study population dynamics and migration over many generations and far into the past. Despite the recent advances, existing spatial and temporal abstraction techniques for space-time flow data have limitations due to the lack of knowledge about the effects of temporal partitioning on flow patterns and their visualization. In this study, we extract state-to-state migration patterns over a period between 1789 and 1924 from a set of cleaned, geocoded and connected family trees from Rootsweb.com. We use the child ladder approach, one that captures changes in family locations by comparing birthplaces and birthyears of consecutive siblings. Our study has two major contributions. First, we introduce a methodology to reveal patterns and trends for analyzing and mapping of migration across space and time using a family tree dataset. Specifically, we evaluate a series of temporal partitioning methods to capture how changes in temporal partitioning influence the results of patterns and trends. Second, we visualize longitudinal population mobility in the US using time-series flow maps. This is one of the first studies to uncover dynamic migration patterns on a larger spatial and temporal scale, than the more typical micro studies of individual movement. Our findings are reflective of the migration patterns of European descendants in the U.S., while native Americans, Blacks, Mexican populations are not represented in the data. [KC1]

[KC1]Need to discuss about this more in limitations, and maybe put in in the abstract and/or introduction. Since this is a methodological paper to map migration from trees, I don’t think we need to add this in the title.

In the year to June 2025, approximately 898,000 people migrated to the United Kingdom, while 693,000 people migrated from the country, resulting in a net migration figure of 204,000. There have consistently been more people migrating to the United Kingdom than leaving it since 1993 when approximately 1,000 more people left the country than arrived. Although migration from the European Union has declined since the Brexit vote of 2016, migration from non-EU countries accelerated rapidly from 2021 onwards. In the year to June 2023, 968,000 people from non-EU countries migrated to the UK, compared with 129,000 from EU member states. Immigration and the 2024 election Since late 2022, immigration, along with the economy and healthcare, has consistently been seen by UK voters as one of the top issues facing the country. Despite a pledge to deter irregular migration via small boats, and controversial plans to send asylum applicants to Rwanda while their claims are being processed, Rishi Sunak's Conservative government lost the trust of the public on this issue. On the eve of the last election, 20 percent of Britons thought the Labour Party would be the best party to handle immigration, compared with 13 percent who thought the Conservatives would handle it better. Sunak and the Conservatives went on to lose this election, suffering their worst defeat in modern elections. Historical context of migration The first humans who arrived in the British Isles, were followed by acts of conquest and settlement from Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, and Normans. In the early modern period, there were also significant waves of migration from people fleeing religious or political persecution, such as the French Huguenots. More recently, large numbers of people also left Britain. Between 1820 and 1957, for example, around 4.5 million people migrated from Britain to America. After World War Two, immigration from Britain's colonies and former colonies was encouraged to meet labour demands. A key group that migrated from the Caribbean between the late 1940s and early 1970s became known as the Windrush generation, named after one of the ships that brought the arrivals to Britain.

Author: P Ofstedal, educator, Minnesota Alliance for Geographic EducationGrade/Audience: high schoolResource type: lessonSubject topic(s): migration, population, mapsRegion: united statesStandards: Minnesota Social Studies Standards

Standard 1. People use geographic representations and geospatial technologies to acquire, process and report information within a spatial context.

Standard 3. Places have physical characteristics (such as climate, topography and vegetation) and human characteristics (such as culture, population, political and economic systems).

Standard 5. The characteristics, distribution and migration of human populations on the earth’s surface influence human systems (cultural, economic and political systems).Objectives: Students will be able to:

1. Analyze migration patterns into and out of their county and explain why these patterns exist.
2. Analyze the age of local in- and out-migrants and explain why these patterns exist.Summary: Students will investigate current in-migration and out-migration patterns in their county through two map websites.

Migration data for the United States are based on year-to-year address changes reported on individual income tax returns filed with the IRS. They present migration patterns by State or by county for the entire United States and are available for inflows—the number of new residents who moved to a State or county and where they migrated from, and outflows—the number of residents leaving a State or county and where they went. The data are available for Filing Years 1991 through 2016 and include:

• Number of returns filed, which approximates the number of households that migrated
• Number of personal exemptions claimed, which approximates the number of individuals
• Total adjusted gross income, starting with Filing Year 1995
• Aggregate migration flows at the State level, by the size of adjusted gross income (AGI) and age of the primary taxpayer, starting with Filing Year 2011.

The methodology used to produce these projections differs from ICLUS v2.0 (https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iclus/recordisplay.cfm?deid=322479). The demographic components of change (i.e., rates of fertility and mortality) for ICLUS v2.1 were taken directly from the Wittgenstein Centre Data Explorer (http://witt.null2.net/shiny/wic/). These projections were produced more recently than the Census projections used in ICLUS v2.0, and incorporate more recent observations of population change. SSP2 is a “middle-of-the-road” projection, where social, economic and technological trends do not shift markedly from historical patterns, resulting in a U.S. population of 455 million people by 2100. Domestic migration trends remain largely consistent with the recent past, however the amenity value of local climate (average precipitation and temperature for summer and winter) is used in ICLUS v2.1.1 to influence migration patterns. The name of the climate model used as the source of future climate patterns is included at the end of the file name (e.g., "GISS-E2-R" or "HadGEM2-ES"). The approach for incorporating climate change into the migration model is described in the ICLUS v2.0 documentation. The SSP5 narrative describes a rapidly growing and flourishing global economy that remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels, and a U.S. population that exceeds 730 million by 2100. ICLUS v2.1 land use projections under SSP5 result in a considerably larger expansion of developed lands relative to SSP2. The the amenity value of local climate (average precipitation and temperature for summer and winter) is used in ICLUS v2.1.1 to influence migration patterns. The name of the climate model used as the source of future climate patterns is included at the end of the file name (e.g., "GISS-E2-R" or "HadGEM2-ES"). The approach for incorporating climate change into the migration model is described in the ICLUS v2.0 documentation. RCP4.5 assumes that global greenhoue gas emissions increase into the latter part of the century, before leveling off and eventually stabilizing by 2100 as a result of various climate change policies. RCP8.5 assumes that global greenhoue gas emissions increase through the year 2100.

Pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) within the Sublette herd comprise one of the largest pronghorn populations in North America. Sublette pronghorn winter in the more southern areas of the upper Green River Basin. Depending upon winter severity, individual pronghorn winter between Pinedale in the north to Rock Springs in the south, and in the western portions of the Red Desert. Winter ranges include a mix of grassland and sagebrush dominated mesas and rolling hills. During migration, animals that have been tracked with GPS collars (n = 362 females) travel an average one-way distance of nearly 60 miles (96 km), with some animals migrating over 200 miles (320 km). This herd is home to the longest distance migrating pronghorn and the ‘Path of the Pronghorn’, the first federally-designated migration corridor. The herd, which currently numbers around 35,000 individuals, has a variety of summer range destinations. Some individuals migrate north to Grand Teton National Park following the ‘Path of the Pronghorn’. Others migrate to summer ranges in the Bondurant Valley, the Gros Ventre Mountains, and along the base of the Wyoming Range. Animals in the southeastern portion of the herd migrate in a more convoluted manner, crisscrossing the Red Desert with their migration routes. Summer ranges generally consist of higher elevation grasslands and open sagebrush habitats inter-mixed with mesic meadows. Sublette pronghorn have a mix of movement strategies, with 55% of individuals displaying migratory behavior with distinct summer and winter ranges, 32% are nomadic with no distinct patterns between seasonal ranges, and 12% are resident residing all year in more local areas. This herd’s population objective is 48,000 individuals, and over the last 15 years modeled population size has oscillated between 31,000 and 62,000. Many individuals within this herd migrate or winter near energy development, mainly oil and gas developments in the Pinedale Anticline, Jonah, and Calpet fields. Previous research has shown that pronghorn spend less time in areas after they have been developed, and in some cases, pronghorn abandon traditional winter ranges altogether. Additional gas wells are permitted in the Normally Pressurized Lance field in the center of the Sublette herd, and pressures are increasing from renewable energy sources such as wind and solar developments along the I-80 corridor in the southern reaches of the herd. However, migrations of Sublette pronghorn have benefitted from wildlife overpasses recently built over HW 191 at Trapper’s Point and Boroff Hill in high-use portions of the migration corridor, and new crossing structures are planned to be built along highway 189 south of Big Piney. These data provide the location of migration routes for pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) in the Sublette population in Wyoming. They were developed from 688 migration sequences collected from a sample size of 362 animals comprising GPS locations collected every 2-5 hours.

This repository contains the data and code necessary to reproduce the analysis and figures in the manuscript " Spring migration patterns of red knots in the Southeast United States disentangled using automated telemetry " by Smith et al. (Scientific Reports 13:11138).Authors (affiliation):Adam D. Smith (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Refuge System, Inventory and Monitoring Branch; Current address: American Bird Conservancy)Felicia J. Sanders (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources)Kara L. Lefevre (Florida Gulf Coast University; Current address: Thompson River University)Janet M. Thibault (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources)Kevin S. Kalasz (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Florida Ecological Services Field Office)Deborah L. Carter (University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study)Maina C. Handmaker (Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts)Fletcher M. Smith (Georgia Department of Natural Resources)Tim Keyes (Georgia Department of Natural Resources)To run the analysis:Download this repository; all code and data is available in this repositoryExtract the zipped REKN-main directory to the desired location on your local machine.Within the REKN-main directory, open the REKN.Rproj file in RStudio on a computer with internet access. Note that RStudio requires R to be installed. This opens the RStudio project associated with the data, code, and analysis.All of the code necessary to process, analyze, and generate figures is located in the Code directory. Open and begin by running the code within 00_Process_REKN_Motus_data.R. Proceed sequentially through other similarly-named files. If interested only in the figures, these are provided as a convenience in the Output directory.

As of 2023, 27.3 percent of California's population were born in a country other than the United States. New Jersey, New York, Florida, and Nevada rounded out the top five states with the largest population of foreign born residents in that year. For the country as a whole, 14.3 percent of residents were foreign born.

The Likely Tables herd contains migrants, but this herd does not migrate between traditional summer and winter seasonal ranges. Instead, much of the herd displays a nomadic tendency, slowly migrating north for the summer using various high use areas as they move. Therefore, annual ranges were modeled using year-round data to demarcate high use areas in lieu modeling specific winter ranges. A high use area being used during winter by many of the collared animals is west of the Warner Mountains, east of U.S. Highway 395, and north of Moon Lake. Some animals live in the agricultural fields west of U.S. Highway 395. There appears to be little if any movement across the highway, which is fenced on both sides in this area. Summer ranges are spread out, with some individuals moving as far north as Goose Lake. A few outliers in the herd moved long distances south toward the Lassen herd or east to Nevada. Drought, increasing fire frequency, invasive annual grasses, and juniper encroachment negatively affect pronghorn habitat. Recent population surveys indicate a declining population (Trausch and others, 2020). Juniper removal on public and private lands have potential to improve habitat quality and potentially reduce predation (Ewanyk, 2020). Fences on public and private lands affect movement corridors and increase crossing and/or migration times. Recent fence modifications on BLM lands have shown potential to ease pronghorn movements (Hudgens, 2022). These mapping layers show the location of the migration routes for pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) in the Likely Tables population in California. They were developed from 29 migration sequences collected from a sample size of 17 animals comprising GPS locations collected every 1-4 hours.

In the past four centuries, the population of the Thirteen Colonies and United States of America has grown from a recorded 350 people around the Jamestown colony in Virginia in 1610, to an estimated 346 million in 2025. While the fertility rate has now dropped well below replacement level, and the population is on track to go into a natural decline in the 2040s, projected high net immigration rates mean the population will continue growing well into the next century, crossing the 400 million mark in the 2070s. Indigenous population Early population figures for the Thirteen Colonies and United States come with certain caveats. Official records excluded the indigenous population, and they generally remained excluded until the late 1800s. In 1500, in the first decade of European colonization of the Americas, the native population living within the modern U.S. borders was believed to be around 1.9 million people. The spread of Old World diseases, such as smallpox, measles, and influenza, to biologically defenseless populations in the New World then wreaked havoc across the continent, often wiping out large portions of the population in areas that had not yet made contact with Europeans. By the time of Jamestown's founding in 1607, it is believed the native population within current U.S. borders had dropped by almost 60 percent. As the U.S. expanded, indigenous populations were largely still excluded from population figures as they were driven westward, however taxpaying Natives were included in the census from 1870 to 1890, before all were included thereafter. It should be noted that estimates for indigenous populations in the Americas vary significantly by source and time period. Migration and expansion fuels population growth The arrival of European settlers and African slaves was the key driver of population growth in North America in the 17th century. Settlers from Britain were the dominant group in the Thirteen Colonies, before settlers from elsewhere in Europe, particularly Germany and Ireland, made a large impact in the mid-19th century. By the end of the 19th century, improvements in transport technology and increasing economic opportunities saw migration to the United States increase further, particularly from southern and Eastern Europe, and in the first decade of the 1900s the number of migrants to the U.S. exceeded one million people in some years. It is also estimated that almost 400,000 African slaves were transported directly across the Atlantic to mainland North America between 1500 and 1866 (although the importation of slaves was abolished in 1808). Blacks made up a much larger share of the population before slavery's abolition. Twentieth and twenty-first century The U.S. population has grown steadily since 1900, reaching one hundred million in the 1910s, two hundred million in the 1960s, and three hundred million in 2007. Since WWII, the U.S. has established itself as the world's foremost superpower, with the world's largest economy, and most powerful military. This growth in prosperity has been accompanied by increases in living standards, particularly through medical advances, infrastructure improvements, clean water accessibility. These have all contributed to higher infant and child survival rates, as well as an increase in life expectancy (doubling from roughly 40 to 80 years in the past 150 years), which have also played a large part in population growth. As fertility rates decline and increases in life expectancy slows, migration remains the largest factor in population growth. Since the 1960s, Latin America has now become the most common origin for migrants in the U.S., while immigration rates from Asia have also increased significantly. It remains to be seen how immigration restrictions of the current administration affect long-term population projections for the United States.

There is increasing concern over how Arctic fauna will adapt to climate related changes in sea-ice. We used long-term sighting and genetic data on beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) in conjunction with multi-decadal patterns of sea-ice in the Pacific Arctic to investigate the influence of sea-ice on spring migration and summer residency patterns. Substantial variations in sea-ice conditions were detected across seasons, years and sub-regions, revealing ice–ocean dynamics more complex than Arctic-wide trends suggest. This variation contrasted with a highly consistent pattern of migration and residency by several populations, indicating that belugas can accommodate widely varying sea-ice conditions to perpetuate philopatry to coastal migration destinations. However, a number of anomalous migration and residency events were detected and coincided with anomalous ice years, and in one case with an increase in killer whale (Orcinus orca) sightings and reported predation on beluga whales. The behavioural shifts were likely driven by changing sea-ice and associated changes in resource dispersion and predation risk. Continued reductions in sea-ice may result in increased predation at key aggregation areas and shifts in beluga whale behaviour with implications for population viability, ecosystem structure and the subsistence cultures that rely on them.

Between 1820 and 1957, over 4.6 million people emigrated from the island of Ireland to the United States. The period with the highest levels of migration came between 1845 and 1855 , as the Great Famine devastated Ireland's population, causing the deaths of roughly one million people and leading to the migration of one million more, most of which was to the United States. The period with the lowest levels of migration came in the 1930s and 40s, as the Great Depression and Second World War created an environment where migration to the US was difficult or impractical.

In 2024, white Americans remained the largest racial group in the United States, numbering just over 254 million. Black Americans followed at nearly 47 million, with Asians totaling around 23 million. Hispanic residents, of any race, constituted the nation’s largest ethnic minority. Despite falling fertility, the U.S. population continues to edge upward and is expected to reach 342 million in 2025. International migrations driving population growth The United States’s population growth now hinges on immigration. Fertility rates have long been in decline, falling well below the replacement rate of 2.1. On the other hand, international migration stepped in to add some 2.8 million new arrivals to the national total that year. Changing demographics and migration patterns Looking ahead, the U.S. population is projected to grow increasingly diverse. By 2060, the Hispanic population is expected to grow to 27 percent of the total population. Likewise, African Americans will remain the largest racial minority at just under 15 percent.

Abstract After having presented the specific migration context of Haiti and its multidimensional vulnerability, this paper shows that the diaspora geography explains, to a large extent, the location of Haitian refugees and asylum seekers in North America and the French Caribbean territories. Then, we explore the relation between migration policy evolution and the development of new migration routes towards South America, where the recognition of the multidimensional nature of this migration has paved the way for the legalization of Haitian migrants, particularly in Brazil. The complementary migration functions of Ecuador, Peru, Brazil and Chile created a new regional migration system centered on the Southeast and the South of Brazil. This emerging South-South migration route is part of a larger Haitian migration system that connects Latin America to North America and the Caribbean.