A global database of Census Data that provides an understanding of population distribution at administrative and zip code levels over 55 years, past, present, and future.
Leverage up-to-date census data with population trends for real estate, market research, audience targeting, and sales territory mapping.
Self-hosted commercial demographic dataset curated based on trusted sources such as the United Nations or the European Commission, with a 99% match accuracy. The global Census Data is standardized, unified, and ready to use.
Use cases for the Global Census Database (Consumer Demographic Data)
Ad targeting
B2B Market Intelligence
Customer analytics
Real Estate Data Estimations
Marketing campaign analysis
Demand forecasting
Sales territory mapping
Retail site selection
Reporting
Audience targeting
Census data export methodology
Our consumer demographic data packages are offered in CSV format. All Demographic data are optimized for seamless integration with popular systems like Esri ArcGIS, Snowflake, QGIS, and more.
Product Features
Historical population data (55 years)
Changes in population density
Urbanization Patterns
Accurate at zip code and administrative level
Optimized for easy integration
Easy customization
Global coverage
Updated yearly
Standardized and reliable
Self-hosted delivery
Fully aggregated (ready to use)
Rich attributes
Why do companies choose our demographic databases
Standardized and unified demographic data structure
Seamless integration in your system
Dedicated location data expert
Note: Custom population data packages are available. Please submit a request via the above contact button for more details.
Four tables of ACS demographic profiles for 2012 to 2016 at the PUMA level. Four profiles include demographics, economic, housing and sociological. Column headers in this database are abbreviated. Please see the data dictionary (shown in worksheet entitled “Dictionary”) for an explanation of these abbreviated headers.
Sourcing accurate and up-to-date demographic data across Asia and MENA has historically been difficult for retail brands looking to expand their store networks in these regions. Either the data does not exist or it isn't readily accessible or updated regularly.
GapMaps uses known population data combined with billions of mobile device location points to provide highly accurate and globally consistent demographic datasets across Asia and MENA at 150m x 150m grid levels in major cities and 1km grids outside of major cities.
With this information, brands can get a detailed understanding of who lives in a catchment, where they work and their spending potential which allows you to:
Premium demographics data for Asia and MENA includes the latest estimates (updated annually) on:
Primary Use Cases for GapMaps Demographic Data:
Integrate GapMaps demographic data with your existing GIS or BI platform to generate powerful visualizations.
Commercial Real-Estate (Brokers, Developers, Investors, Single & Multi-tenant O/O)
Tenant Recruitment
Target Marketing
Market Potential / Gap Analysis
Marketing / Advertising (Billboards/OOH, Marketing Agencies, Indoor Screens)
Customer Profiling
Target Marketing
Market Share Analysis
The American Community Survey Education Tabulation (ACS-ED) is a custom tabulation of the ACS produced for the National Center of Education Statistics (NCES) by the U.S. Census Bureau. The ACS-ED provides a rich collection of social, economic, demographic, and housing characteristics for school systems, school-age children, and the parents of school-age children. In addition to focusing on school-age children, the ACS-ED provides enrollment iterations for children enrolled in public school. The data profiles include percentages (along with associated margins of error) that allow for comparison of school district-level conditions across the U.S. For more information about the NCES ACS-ED collection, visit the NCES Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates (EDGE) program at: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Demographic/ACSAnnotation values are negative value representations of estimates and have values when non-integer information needs to be represented. See the table below for a list of common Estimate/Margin of Error (E/M) values and their corresponding Annotation (EA/MA) values.All information contained in this file is in the public domain. Data users are advised to review NCES program documentation and feature class metadata to understand the limitations and appropriate use of these data.-9An '-9' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.-8An '-8' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available.-6A '-6' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.-5A '-5' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.-3A '-3' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.-2A '-2' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.
The table IN- Demographic Data is part of the dataset Demographic Data, available at https://redivis.com/datasets/fh74-90v3ge9m2. It contains 4305935 rows across 699 variables.
The Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) program provides a continuous and comprehensive flow of data on the buying habits of American consumers, including data on their expenditures, income, and consumer unit (families and single consumers) characteristics. These data are used widely in economic research and analysis, and in support of revisions of the Consumer Price Index.
The CE program is comprised of two separate components (each with its own survey questionnaire and independent sample), the Diary Survey and the quarterly Interview Survey (ICPSR 36237). This data collection contains the Diary Survey component, which was designed to obtain data on frequently purchased smaller items, including food, housing, apparel and services, transportation, entertainment, and out-of-pocket health care costs. Each consumer unit (CU) recorded its expenditures in a diary for two consecutive 1-week periods. Although the diary was designed to collect information on expenditures that could not be easily recalled over time, respondents were asked to report all expenses (except overnight travel) that the CU incurred during the survey week.
The 2013 Diary Survey release contains five sets of data files (FMLD, MEMD, EXPD, DTBD, DTID), and one processing file (DSTUB). The FMLD, MEMD, EXPD, DTBD, and DTID files are organized by the quarter of the calendar year in which the data were collected. There are four quarterly datasets for each of these files.
The FMLD files contain CU characteristics, income, and summary level expenditures; the MEMD files contain member characteristics and income data; the EXPD files contain detailed weekly expenditures at the Universal Classification Code (UCC) level; the DTBD files contain the CU's reported annual income values or the mean of the five imputed income values in the multiple imputation method; and the DTID files contain the five imputed income values. Please note that the summary level expenditure and income information on the FMLD files permit the data user to link consumer spending, by general expenditure category, and household characteristics and demographics on one set of files.
The DSTUB file provides the aggregation scheme used in the published consumer expenditure tables. The DSTUB file is further explained in Section III.F.6. 'Processing Files' of the Diary Survey Users' Guide. A second documentation guide, the 'Users' Guide to Income Imputation,' includes information on how to appropriately use the imputed income data.
Demographic and family characteristics data include age, sex, race, marital status, and CU relationships for each CU member. Income information was also collected, such as wage, salary, unemployment compensation, child support, and alimony, as well as information on the employment of each CU member age 14 and over.
The unpublished integrated CE data tables produced by the BLS are available to download through NADAC (click on 'Other' in the Dataset(s) section). The tables show average and percentile expenditures for detailed items, as well as the standard error and coefficient of variation (CV) for each spending estimate. The BLS unpublished integrated CE data tables are provided as an easy-to-use tool for obtaining spending estimates. However, users are cautioned to read the BLS explanatory letter accompanying the tables. The letter explains that estimates of average expenditures on detailed spending items (such as leisure and art-related categories) may be unreliable due to so few reports of expenditures for those items.
According to a survey from March 2023 among U.S. Taylor Swift fans, also called 'Swifties', the largest share of Swift fans were in the group of millenials. The second largest share was within the group of baby boomers, followed by Gen X. In 2023, Swift announced her first tour in years, called 'Era', which already caused chaos when her significant fan base tried to purchase tickets for the long anticipated concerts.
Ipsos Global @dvisor wave 11 was conducted on July 6 and July 20, 2010. It included the following question sections: A: Demographic Profile, B: Consumer Confidence, R: Reuters Battery, G: Country Image Rating, H: Economy/Spending/Purchasing
Annual Resident Population Estimates by Age Group, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2018 // Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division // The contents of this file are released on a rolling basis from December through June. // Note: 'In combination' means in combination with one or more other races. The sum of the five race-in-combination groups adds to more than the total population because individuals may report more than one race. Hispanic origin is considered an ethnicity, not a race. Hispanics may be of any race. Responses of 'Some Other Race' from the 2010 Census are modified. This results in differences between the population for specific race categories shown for the 2010 Census population in this file versus those in the original 2010 Census data. For more information, see https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/modified-race-summary-file-method/mrsf2010.pdf. // The estimates are based on the 2010 Census and reflect changes to the April 1, 2010 population due to the Count Question Resolution program and geographic program revisions. // For detailed information about the methods used to create the population estimates, see https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology.html. // Each year, the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program (PEP) utilizes current data on births, deaths, and migration to calculate population change since the most recent decennial census, and produces a time series of estimates of population. The annual time series of estimates begins with the most recent decennial census data and extends to the vintage year. The vintage year (e.g., V2017) refers to the final year of the time series. The reference date for all estimates is July 1, unless otherwise specified. With each new issue of estimates, the Census Bureau revises estimates for years back to the last census. As each vintage of estimates includes all years since the most recent decennial census, the latest vintage of data available supersedes all previously produced estimates for those dates. The Population Estimates Program provides additional information including historical and intercensal estimates, evaluation estimates, demographic analysis, and research papers on its website: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest.html.
The dashboard was creating using Business Analyst Infographics. Read more about it here: https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/data/overview?rmedium=www_esri_com_EtoF&rsource=/en-us/arcgis/products/esri-demographics/overview Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2020 Summary File 1, 2021 American Community Survey(ACS), and ESRI 2022 Demographics and Tapestry Segmentation. For more information on Esri Demographics see HERE and for Tapestry see HERE.Geographies: The council district boundaries used in this dashboard are those that were effective as of May 6, 2023.Much of the science for determining the data for an irregular polygon is explained here:https://doc.arcgis.com/en/community-analyst/help/calculation-estimates-for-user-created-areas.htmCalculation estimates for user-created areasBusiness Analyst employs a GeoEnrichment service which uses the concept of a study area to define the location of the point or area that you want to enrich with additional information. If one or more points is input as a study area, the service will create a one-mile ring buffer around the points or points to collect and append enrichment data. You can optionally change the ring buffer size or create drive-time service areas around a point.The GeoEnrichment service uses a sophisticated geographic retrieval methodology to aggregate data for rings and other polygons. A geographic retrieval methodology determines how data is gathered and summarized or aggregated for input features. For standard geographic units, such as states, provinces, counties, or postal codes, the link between a designated area and its attribute data is a simple one-to-one relationship. For example, if an input study trade area contains a selection of ZIP Codes, the data retrieval is a simple process of gathering the data for those areas.Data Allocation MethodThe Data Allocation method allocates block group data to custom areas by examining where the population is located within the block group and determines how much of the population of a block group overlaps a custom area. This method is used in the United States, and similarly in Canada. The population data reported for census blocks, a more granular level of geography than block groups, is used to determine where the population is distributed within a block group. If the geographic center of a block falls within the custom area, the entire population for the block is used to weight the block group data. The geographic distribution of the population at the census block level determines the proportion of census block group data that is allocated to user specified areas as shown in the example.Note:Depending on the data, households, housing units or businesses at the block group level are used as weights. Employing block centriods is superior because it accounts for the possibility that the population may not be evenly distributed geographically throughout a block group.
By using detailed geodemographic data on 700 million individuals, we help you create very specific groups of customers. This comprehensive data gives a complete picture of any segment of your audience and what they want.
Here are Xverum's priorities with global audience data: - High recency - Global coverage (240+ countries) - 120-day freshness guarantee - Profile change detection attributes (NEW feature) - Over 100 data points per profile - GDPR- and CCPA-compliant
By analyzing characteristics from Xverum's global identity data, such as company size, industry, and location, you can prioritize leads that are more likely to convert, improving sales efficiency and getting a detailed audience segmentation.
A powerful combination of geodemographic data with detailed attribute data allows you to uncover deeper insights into your audience, resulting in more effective marketing campaigns and higher ROI for your business.
Our 700M+ Individual profiles dataset does not include PII and/or phone numbers.
As of January 2025, users aged 25 to 34 years made up Facebook's largest audience in the United States, accounting for 24.2 percent of the social network's user base, with 12.3 percent of those users being women. Overall, 9.7 percent of users aged 35 to 44 years were women, and 9.3 percent were men. How many people use Facebook in the United States? Facebook is by far the most used social network in the world and finds a huge share of its audience in the United States. Facebook’s U.S. audience size comes second only to India. In 2023, there were over 246 million Facebook users in the U.S. By 2028, it is estimated that around 263 million people in the U.S. will be signed up for the platform. How do users in the United States view the platform? Although Facebook is widely used and very popular with U.S. consumers, there are issues of trust with its North American audience. As of November 2021, 72 percent of respondents reported that they did not trust Facebook with their personal data. Despite having privacy doubts, a May 2022 survey found that 20 percent of adults had a very favorable opinion of Facebook, and one-third held a somewhat positive view of the platform.
Ipsos Global @dvisor wave 22 was conducted on June 15 and June 28, 2011. It included the following question sections: A: Demographic Profile, B: Consumer Confidence, R: Reuters Battery, CR: Energy Choices, CS: Leader Image, CU: Immigration.
During a survey carried out in November 2021 among marketers from 10 countries worldwide, 52 percent stated their organizations used past purchases to define target consumer segments. Consumer demographics, such as age, gender, income, or location, were used most often, named by 60 percent of respondents.
The State Legislative District Summary File (Sample) (SLDSAMPLE) contains the sample data, which is the information compiled from the questions asked of a sample of all people and housing units. Population items include basic population totals; urban and rural; households and families; marital status; grandparents as caregivers; language and ability to speak English; ancestry; place of birth, citizenship status, and year of entry; migration; place of work; journey to work (commuting); school enrollment and educational attainment; veteran status; disability; employment status; industry, occupation, and class of worker; income; and poverty status. Housing items include basic housing totals; urban and rural; number of rooms; number of bedrooms; year moved into unit; household size and occupants per room; units in structure; year structure built; heating fuel; telephone service; plumbing and kitchen facilities; vehicles available; value of home; monthly rent; and shelter costs. The file contains subject content identical to that shown in Summary File 3 (SF 3).
Pursuant to Local Laws 126, 127, and 128 of 2016, certain demographic data is collected voluntarily and anonymously by persons voluntarily seeking social services. This data can be used by agencies and the public to better understand the demographic makeup of client populations and to better understand and serve residents of all backgrounds and identities.
The data presented here has been collected through either electronic form or paper surveys offered at the point of application for services. These surveys are anonymous.
Each record represents an anonymized demographic profile of an individual applicant for social services, disaggregated by response option, agency, and program. Response options include information regarding ancestry, race, primary and secondary languages, English proficiency, gender identity, and sexual orientation.
Idiosyncrasies or Limitations:
Note that while the dataset contains the total number of individuals who have identified their ancestry or languages spoke, because such data is collected anonymously, there may be instances of a single individual completing multiple voluntary surveys. Additionally, the survey being both voluntary and anonymous has advantages as well as disadvantages: it increases the likelihood of full and honest answers, but since it is not connected to the individual case, it does not directly inform delivery of services to the applicant. The paper and online versions of the survey ask the same questions but free-form text is handled differently. Free-form text fields are expected to be entered in English although the form is available in several languages. Surveys are presented in 11 languages.
Paper Surveys
1. Are optional
2. Survey taker is expected to specify agency that provides service
2. Survey taker can skip or elect not to answer questions
3. Invalid/unreadable data may be entered for survey date or date may be skipped
4. OCRing of free-form tet fields may fail.
5. Analytical value of free-form text answers is unclear
Online Survey
1. Are optional
2. Agency is defaulted based on the URL
3. Some questions must be answered
4. Date of survey is automated
Apple Card owners in the United States in 2023 were typically Millennials who tended to have a relatively high income. This is according to a survey held among Americans who either owned or did not own Apple's credit card. The source adds this demographic was in line with other surveys they held for other Apple products. Statista's Consumer Insights also noted that U.S. Apple iOS users are typically high income. The source of this particular survey, however, does not state how many of its 4,000 respondents owned Apple Card. All statistics on Apple Pay - and services that rely on it, such as Apple Card and Apple Cash - are estimates, typically based on survey information. Apple Inc. does not share figures on individual services, whereas financial providers who offer Apple Pay, Apple Card, etc. are contractually forbidden to share such information.
For the purpose of our partners and the community to find demographic information on individual member of households that applied for services provided by the Office of Resilience and Community services. Updated Quarterly. Data includes: Client IndexHousehold IndexRaceGenderEthnicityDisability StatusMilitary StatusHealth Insurance (Y/N)Employment StatusEducation StatusHead of Household (Y/N)Age
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context :
We share a large database containing electroencephalographic signals from 87 human participants, with more than 20,800 trials in total representing about 70 hours of recording. It was collected during brain-computer interface (BCI) experiments and organized into 3 datasets (A, B, and C) that were all recorded following the same protocol: right and left hand motor imagery (MI) tasks during one single day session.
It includes the performance of the associated BCI users, detailed information about the demographics, personality and cognitive user’s profile, and the experimental instructions and codes (executed in the open-source platform OpenViBE).
Such database could prove useful for various studies, including but not limited to: 1) studying the relationships between BCI users' profiles and their BCI performances, 2) studying how EEG signals properties varies for different users' profiles and MI tasks, 3) using the large number of participants to design cross-user BCI machine learning algorithms or 4) incorporating users' profile information into the design of EEG signal classification algorithms.
Sixty participants (Dataset A) performed the first experiment, designed in order to investigated the impact of experimenters' and users' gender on MI-BCI user training outcomes, i.e., users performance and experience, (Pillette & al). Twenty one participants (Dataset B) performed the second one, designed to examined the relationship between users' online performance (i.e., classification accuracy) and the characteristics of the chosen user-specific Most Discriminant Frequency Band (MDFB) (Benaroch & al). The only difference between the two experiments lies in the algorithm used to select the MDFB. Dataset C contains 6 additional participants who completed one of the two experiments described above. Physiological signals were measured using a g.USBAmp (g.tec, Austria), sampled at 512 Hz, and processed online using OpenViBE 2.1.0 (Dataset A) & OpenVIBE 2.2.0 (Dataset B). For Dataset C, participants C83 and C85 were collected with OpenViBE 2.1.0 and the remaining 4 participants with OpenViBE 2.2.0. Experiments were recorded at Inria Bordeaux sud-ouest, France.
Duration : Each participant's folder is composed of approximately 48 minutes EEG recording. Meaning six 7-minutes runs and a 6-minutes baseline.
Documents
Instructions: checklist read by experimenters during the experiments.
Questionnaires: the Mental Rotation test used, the translation of 4 questionnaires, notably the Demographic and Social information, the Pre and Post-session questionnaires, and the Index of Learning style. English and french version
Performance: The online OpenViBE BCI classification performances obtained by each participant are provided for each run, as well as answers to all questionnaires
Scenarios/scripts : set of OpenViBE scenarios used to perform each of the steps of the MI-BCI protocol, e.g., acquire training data, calibrate the classifier or run the online MI-BCI
Database : raw signals
Dataset A : N=60 participants
Dataset B : N=21 participants
Dataset C : N=6 participants
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset includes the following variables: client county; number, percentage, average, and age of clients served, number and percentage of adolescent client served, number and percentage of male clients served , and clients served by race and ethnicity (Latino, White, African American, Asian and Pacific Islander, Other (including Native American); and clients served by primary language (Spanish, English, Other).
A global database of Census Data that provides an understanding of population distribution at administrative and zip code levels over 55 years, past, present, and future.
Leverage up-to-date census data with population trends for real estate, market research, audience targeting, and sales territory mapping.
Self-hosted commercial demographic dataset curated based on trusted sources such as the United Nations or the European Commission, with a 99% match accuracy. The global Census Data is standardized, unified, and ready to use.
Use cases for the Global Census Database (Consumer Demographic Data)
Ad targeting
B2B Market Intelligence
Customer analytics
Real Estate Data Estimations
Marketing campaign analysis
Demand forecasting
Sales territory mapping
Retail site selection
Reporting
Audience targeting
Census data export methodology
Our consumer demographic data packages are offered in CSV format. All Demographic data are optimized for seamless integration with popular systems like Esri ArcGIS, Snowflake, QGIS, and more.
Product Features
Historical population data (55 years)
Changes in population density
Urbanization Patterns
Accurate at zip code and administrative level
Optimized for easy integration
Easy customization
Global coverage
Updated yearly
Standardized and reliable
Self-hosted delivery
Fully aggregated (ready to use)
Rich attributes
Why do companies choose our demographic databases
Standardized and unified demographic data structure
Seamless integration in your system
Dedicated location data expert
Note: Custom population data packages are available. Please submit a request via the above contact button for more details.