In 2023, around 3,640.56 violent crimes per 100,000 residents were reported in Oakland, California. This made Oakland the most dangerous city in the United States in that year. Four categories of violent crimes were used: murder and non-negligent manslaughter; forcible rape; robbery; and aggravated assault. Only cities with a population of at least 200,000 were considered.

Updated daily. Dangerous Buildings are scored according to several objective criteria. The higher the score, the more likely it is that the City will be forced to demolish the property, and the shorter the timeline the property owner has to avoid this. Non-emergency cases start with the owner being given a 30 day Order to Repair or Demolish.

From 2013 to 2017, there were 1,466 recorded bicycle and pedestrian crashes. Using the Weighted Severity Index, staff calculated the top 10 most dangerous intersections for bicyclists and pedestrians. Out of the top 10 most dangerous intersections, seven of them were located within Oklahoma City. Two of the intersections were in Moore and one was in Norman.

In this web map created I wanted to focus on the state of New Jersey since 2 of its cities are very high in crime in the United States. Camden and Trenton in Particular are the highest crime rates in New Jersey. I was able to create this web map by showing the police departments in the most dangerous parts of the cities which is shown by the darker the red gets the more dangerous it gets in these parts of the state

In 2024, the highest homicide rate among 22 Latin American and Caribbean countries surveyed was in Haiti, with around 62 murders committed per 100,000 inhabitants. Trinidad and Tobago came in second, with a homicide rate of 46, while Honduras ranked seventh, with 25. In the same year, the lowest rate was recorded in El Salvador, with a homicide rate of 1.9 per 100,000 inhabitants. A violence-ridden region Violence and crime are some of the most pressing problems affecting Latin American society nowadays. More than 40 of the 50 most dangerous cities in the world are located in this region, as well as one of the twenty countries with the least peace in the world according to the Global Peace Index. Despite governments’ large spending on security and high imprisonment rates, drug and weapon trafficking, organized crime, and gangs have turned violence into an epidemic that affects the whole region and a solution to this issue appears to be hardly attainable. The cost of violence in Mexico Mexico stands out as an example of the great cost that violence inflicts upon a country, since beyond claiming human lives, it also affects everyday life and has a negative impact on the economy. Mexicans have a high perceived level of insecurity, as they do not only fear becoming victims of homicide, but also of other common crimes, such as assault or rape. Such fear prevents people from performing everyday activities, for instance, going out at night, taking a taxi or going to the movies or the theater. Furthermore, the economic toll of violence in Mexico is more than considerable. For example, the cost of homicide and violent crime amounted to 2099.8 and 1778.1 billion Mexican pesos in 2023, respectively.

Dangerous and Substandard Structure (DSS) features and data for use in online mapping and for export by citizens and other users of the data.

In 2023, the state with the highest crime rate in the United States per 100,000 inhabitants was New Mexico. That year, the crime rate was ******** crimes per 100,000 people. In comparison, New Hampshire had the lowest crime rate at ****** crimes per 100,000 people. Crime rate The crime rate in the United States has generally decreased over time. There are several factors attributed to the decrease in the crime rate across the United States. An increase in the number of police officers and an increase in income are some of the reasons for a decrease in the crime rate. Unfortunately, people of color have been disproportionately affected by crime rates, as they are more likely to be arrested for a crime versus a white person. Crime rates regionally The District of Columbia had the highest rate of reported violent crimes in the United States in 2023 per 100,000 inhabitants. The most common crime clearance type in metropolitan counties in the United States in 2020 was murder and non-negligent manslaughter. The second most dangerous city in the country in 2020 was Detroit. Detroit has faced severe levels of economic and demographic declines in the past years. Not only has the population decreased, the city has filed for bankruptcy. Despite the median household income increasing, the city still struggles financially.

In 2023, the District of Columbia had the highest reported violent crime rate in the United States, with 1,150.9 violent crimes per 100,000 of the population. Maine had the lowest reported violent crime rate, with 102.5 offenses per 100,000 of the population. Life in the District The District of Columbia has seen a fluctuating population over the past few decades. Its population decreased throughout the 1990s, when its crime rate was at its peak, but has been steadily recovering since then. While unemployment in the District has also been falling, it still has had a high poverty rate in recent years. The gentrification of certain areas within Washington, D.C. over the past few years has made the contrast between rich and poor even greater and is also pushing crime out into the Maryland and Virginia suburbs around the District. Law enforcement in the U.S. Crime in the U.S. is trending downwards compared to years past, despite Americans feeling that crime is a problem in their country. In addition, the number of full-time law enforcement officers in the U.S. has increased recently, who, in keeping with the lower rate of crime, have also made fewer arrests than in years past.

No declared Dangerous Dog in the City of Austin and Travis County should ever be running at large. They are court ordered to be restrained at all times and should be wearing a large tag identifying them as a Dangerous Dog. They have attacked in the past. The owner is required to provide $100,000 in financial responsibility. If they attack again the court could order them put to sleep. Last updated January 2015

Road Dangerous Detection

## Overview

Road Dangerous Detection is a dataset for instance segmentation tasks - it contains Lane Curb Hole annotations for 755 images.

## Getting Started

You can download this dataset for use within your own projects, or fork it into a workspace on Roboflow to create your own model.

  ## License

  This dataset is available under the [CC BY 4.0 license](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY 4.0).

These data represent the location of Danger Zones and Restricted Areas within coastal and marine waters, as outlined by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and the Raster Navigational Charts (RNC). The CFR defines a Danger Zone as, "A defined water area (or areas) used for target practice, bombing, rocket firing or other especially hazardous operations, normally for the armed forces. The danger zones may be closed to the public on a full-time or intermittent basis, as stated in the regulations." The CFR defines a Restricted Area as, "A defined water area for the purpose of prohibiting or limiting public access to the area. Restricted areas generally provide security for Government property and/or protection to the public from the risks of damage or injury arising from the Government's use of that area." Authoritative information relating to these data may be found in Title 33, Chapter II of the CFR (Part 334).

© MarineCadastre.gov This layer is a component of Navigation and Marine Transportation.

Marine Cadastre themed service for public consumption featuring layers associated with navigation and marine transportation.

This map service presents spatial information about MarineCadastre.gov services across the United States and Territories in the Web Mercator projection. The service was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), but may contain data and information from a variety of data sources, including non-NOAA data. NOAA provides the information “as-is” and shall incur no responsibility or liability as to the completeness or accuracy of this information. NOAA assumes no responsibility arising from the use of this information. The NOAA Office for Coastal Management will make every effort to provide continual access to this service but it may need to be taken down during routine IT maintenance or in case of an emergency. If you plan to ingest this service into your own application and would like to be informed about planned and unplanned service outages or changes to existing services, please register for our Data Services Newsletter (http://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/publications/subscribe). For additional information, please contact the NOAA Office for Coastal Management (coastal.info@noaa.gov).

© MarineCadastre.gov

In Europe, the Baltic countries of Latvia and Lithuania had the highest and third highest homicide rates respectively in 2022. Latvia had the highest rate at over four per 100,000 inhabitants. Meanwhile, the lowest homicide rate was found in Liechtenstein, with zero murders The most dangerous country worldwide Saint Kitts and Nevis is the world's most dangerous country to live in in terms of murder rate. The Caribbean country had a homicide rate of 65 per 100,000 inhabitants. Nine of the 10 countries with the highest murder rates worldwide are located in Latin America and the Caribbean. Whereas Celaya in Mexico was listed as the city with the highest murder rate worldwide, Colima in Mexico was the city with the highest homicide rate in Latin America, so the numbers vary from source to source. Nevertheless, several Mexican cities rank among the deadliest in the world when it comes to intentional homicides. Violent conflicts worldwide Notably, these figures do not include deaths that resulted from war or a violent conflict. While there is a persistent number of conflicts worldwide, resulting casualties are not considered murders. Partially due to this reason, homicide rates in Latin America are higher than those in countries such as Ukraine or the DR Congo. A different definition of murder in these circumstances could change the rate significantly.

Subrosion is the underground leaching and transporting of mostly easily soluble rocks. Subrodable are chemical sediments, such as the easily soluble chlorides stone salt and potassium salt, sulphate rocks such as plaster and anhydrite (sulfate carbonate) and the heavier soluble carbonate rocks e.g. limestone (carbonate carbonate). Most of the damage in Lower Saxony is due to the leaching of sulphate rocks. In subrosion, it is necessary to distinguish between regular and irregular leaching. Regular leaching takes place extensively on the surface of the subrodable rock and leads to wide, usually small reductions of the terrain. Irregular leaching focuses on a small-scale, narrowly limited area and can lead to the formation of caves, muds or gutters. It progresses in the solid rock mainly along crevices or joints in the rock. Therefore, loosened mountain areas in tectonic disturbance zones are also mostly areas of intense subrosion. If the boundary load capacity of the mountain above a cavity is exceeded, this cavity can collapse and break through to the earth’s surface (earthfall). The layer strength of the soluble rock and thus the possible size of a cavity are decisive for the size of the burglary on the terrain surface. About 50 percent of the earthquakes in Lower Saxony have a diameter of up to two meters and about 40 percent the diameter is between two and five meters. Although these diameters appear quite small, the impact on structures can be very large. The IEG50 map shows areas where there is an area-like threat from landfall.
The information shown in the map does not replace a ground study according to DIN EN 1997-2 (DIN 4020).

This project used a 2019 crimes dataset (crimes which are dangerous to the victims) to create a hotspot map for dangerous crimes in Philadelphia to see the geographic locations that have more violent crime. A hotspot map was also made for shooting victims in Philadelphia to give more weight for fatal crimes. Theoretically, the places where the two of these overlap would be the most dangerous portions of the city. The different census tracts of the city are then enriched to determine where areas of lower income (and therefore lower housing cost) would be. Finally, buffers are created around the University of Pennsylvania, Temple, and La Salle University for evaluating safety.Notable Modules Used: Python: pandas, numpy, matplotlib ArcGIS: create_buffers, find_hot_spots, enrich_layer

This web map shows the current wildfires and fire danger zones within Canada. The layers used within this web map are Esri Canada's wildfire live feature services that are updated daily along with NRCan's current fire danger WMS. A description of each layer can be found below along with the link to their respective items on ArcGIS Online.***The live feature services within this webmap are now paused and will not receive data updates until next fire season. April 1st, 2025 is the predicated date for this service to resume***Active Wildfires in CanadaReported active fire locations are updated daily as provided by fire management agencies (provinces, territories and Parks Canada). The fires data is managed through a national Data Integration Project (DIP) coordinated by the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) and Natural Resources Canada with participation from all partner agencies. The active fires data includes attributes for agency, fire name, latitude, longitude, start date, fire size (ha) and stage of control (fire status). Possible values for stage of control include: OC (Out of Control), BH (Being Held), UC (Under Control), EX (Out).Supplemental InformationThe national Data Integration Project (DIP) is coordinated by the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) and Natural Resources Canada with participation from all partner agencies. This initiative focuses on development and implementation of data standards and enabling the exchange and access of national fire data. More details are available in the CIFFC IM/IT Strategy, available at: https://ciffc.ca/publications/general-publications.Feux de végétation actifs au CanadaLes positions rapportées des feux de végétation actifs sont mises à jour quotidiennement d'après les données fournies par les agences de gestion des feux (provinces, territoires et Parcs Canada). Les données sur les feux sont gérées dans le cadre d'un Projet d'intégration de données national coordonné par le Centre interservices des feux de forêt du Canada (CIFFC) et par Ressources naturelles Canada, avec la participation de tous les organismes partenaires. Les données sur les feux actifs comprennent les champs d'attributs des agences, le nom du feu, la latitude, la longitude, le début du feu, la taille du feu (ha) et le stade de contrôle (état du feu). Les valeurs possibles pour le stade de contrôle sont les suivantes : OC (out of control/hors de contrôle), BH (being held/contenu), UC (under control/maîtrisé) et EX (out/éteint).Renseignements complémentairesLe Projet d'intégration de données national est coordonné par le CIFFC et par Ressources naturelles Canada, avec la participation de tous les organismes partenaires. Cette initiative a pour but d'élaborer et de mettre en œuvre des normes de données, ainsi que de rendre possible l'accès aux données nationales sur les feux et l'échange de ces données. On trouvera plus de détails à ce sujet dans la Stratégie de GI/TI du CIFFC, à l'adresse suivante : https://ciffc.ca/publications/general-publicationsActive Wildfire Perimeters in CanadaThis dataset displays active wildfire perimeters derived from hotspots identified in satellite imagery provided by the Canadian Wildland Fire Information System (CWFIS) and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) updated every 3 hours. || Ce jeu de données, mis à jour toutes les trois heures, affiche les périmètres de feux de forêt actifs dérivés des points chauds relevés dans l’imagerie satellite fournie par le Système canadien d’information sur les feux de végétation (SCIFV) et Ressources naturelles Canada (RNCan).Wildfire Smoke Forecast in CanadaThis layer displays forecasted wildfire smoke across Canada sourced from BlueSky Canada's FireSmoke Canada app, updated every 6 hours. The wildfire smoke layer consists of hourly concentrations of particulate matter 2.5 microns and smaller (PM2.5) in units of micrograms per meter cubed (µg/m3) observed at ground level from wildfires. It is an approximation of when and where wildfire smoke events may occur over the next two days. This layer is sourced from BlueSky Canada's FireSmoke Canada app.Current Fire DangerFire Danger is a relative index of how easy it is to ignite vegetation, how difficult a fire may be to control, and how much damage a fire may do. Fire Danger is a reclassification of the CFFDRS fire weather index (FWI) which is a numeric rating of fire intensity.These general fire descriptions apply to most coniferous forests. The national fire danger maps show conditions as classified by the provincial and territorial fire management agencies. Choice and interpretation of classes may vary between provinces. For fuel-specific fire behavior, consult the Fire Behavior Prediction maps.• Low: Fires likely to be self-extinguishing and new ignitions unlikely. Any existing fires limited to smoldering in deep, drier layers.• Moderate: Creeping or gentle surface fires. Fires easily contained by ground crews with pumps and hand tools.• High: Moderate to vigorous surface fire with intermittent crown involvement. Challenging for ground crews to handle; heavy equipment (bulldozers, tanker trucks, aircraft) often required to contain fire.• Very High: High-intensity fire with partial to full crown involvement. Head fire conditions beyond the ability of ground crews; air attack with retardant required to effectively attack fire's head.• Extreme: Fast-spreading, high-intensity crown fire. Very difficult to control. Suppression actions limited to flanks, with only indirect actions possible against the fire's head.Forecasted weather data provided by Environment Canada. More information about forecasted weather is available at https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/background/dsm/fwiMore information about the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System is available at https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/background/summary/fwiMaps are produced using Spatial Fire Management System and are updated multiple times per day.Maps updated daily, year-round.Supplemental InformationThe Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (CFFDRS). is a national system for rating the risk of forest fires in Canada.Forest fire danger is a general term used to express a variety of factors in the fire environment, such as ease of ignition and difficulty of control. Fire danger rating systems produce qualitative and/or numeric indices of fire potential, which are used as guides in a wide variety of fire management activities.The CFFDRS has been under development since 1968. Currently, two subsystems–the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System and the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction (FBP) System–are being used extensively in Canada and internationally.Risque d'incendie actuelLe risque d'incendie est un indice relatif indiquant le niveau de facilité pour allumer un incendie de végétation, le niveau de difficulté qu'un incendie peut demander pour être contrôlé ainsi que la quantité de dommages qu'un incendie peut causer.Ces descriptions générales des incendies s'appliquent à la plupart des forêts de conifères. Les cartes nationales sur le danger d'incendie illustrent les conditions telles qu'elles sont classées par les agences provinciales et territoriales de gestion des feux. Le choix et l'interprétation des classes peuvent varier entre les provinces. En ce qui a trait au comportement des incendies en regard du combustible spécifique, veuillez consulter les cartes de prédiction du comportement des incendies.• Faible: Incendie possiblement auto-extincteur; de nouveaux allumages sont invraisemblables. Tout incendie existant est limité à couver dans des couches profondes plus sèches.• Modéré: Incendie de surface rampant modéré. Il est facilement circonscrit par les équipes au sol munies de pompes et d'outils manuels.• Élevé: Incendie de surface modéré à vigoureux avec implication intermittente des cimes. Pose des défis aux équipes chargées de le combattre sur le terrain; les équipements lourds (bouteurs, camions-citernes à eau et avions) sont souvent requis pour contenir l'incendie.• Très élevé: Incendie de forte intensité avec implication partielle ou complète des cimes. Les conditions au front de l'incendie sont au-delà de la capacité des équipes sur le terrain à y faire face; les attaques aériennes avec largage de produits ignifugeants sont requises pour combattre effectivement le front de l'incendie.• Extrême: Feu de cimes à forte intensité et à propagation rapide. Très difficile à contrôler. Les actions de suppression sont limitées aux flancs alors que seules des actions indirectes sont possibles au front de l'incendie.Prévisions météorologiques fournies par Environnement Canada. Pour de plus amples renseignements sur les prévisions, consultez la section Renseignements généraux.De plus amples informations sur la Méthode canadienne de l'indice Forêt-Météo (IFM) sont disponibles à la rubrique Renseignements généraux.Les cartes sont produites à l'aide du Système de gestion spatiale des feux de forêt et sont mises à jour plusieurs fois par jour.Les cartes sont mises à jour quotidiennement, tout au long de l'année l'année.Renseignements complémentairesLa Méthode canadienne d'évaluation des dangers d'incendie de forêt (MCEDIF) est une méthode nationale pour classer le risque d'incendie de forêt au Canada.Le danger d'incendie de forêt est un terme général employé pour exprimer une diversité de facteurs dans les conditions de brûlage tels que la facilité d'allumage et la difficulté de contrôle. Les méthodes d'évaluation du danger d'incendie génèrent des indices qualitatifs ou numériques du potentiel d'incendie qui sont utilisés comme guides dans une grande variété d'activités de gestion des incendies de forêt.La MCEDIF est en cours d'élaboration depuis 1968. En ce moment, deux sous-systèmes – la Méthode

Study conducted from 2012-2015 on the most dangerous places for pedestrians in Texas.

In 2022, the New Orleans-Metairie, LA metro area recorded the highest homicide rate of U.S. cities with a population over 250,000, at **** homicides per 100,000 residents, followed by the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area. However, homicide data was not recorded in all U.S. metro areas, meaning that there may be some cities with a higher homicide rate. St. Louis St. Louis, which had a murder and nonnegligent manslaughter rate of **** in 2022, is the second-largest city by population in Missouri. It is home to many famous treasures, such as the St. Louis Cardinals baseball team, Washington University in St. Louis, the Saint Louis Zoo, and the renowned Gateway Arch. It is also home to many corporations, such as Monsanto, Arch Coal, and Emerson Electric. The economy of St. Louis is centered around business and healthcare, and boasts ten Fortune 500 companies. Crime in St. Louis Despite all of this, St. Louis suffers from high levels of crime and violence. As of 2023, it was listed as the seventh most dangerous city in the world as a result of their extremely high murder rate. Not only does St. Louis have one of the highest homicide rates in the United States, it also reports one of the highest numbers of violent crimes. Despite high crime levels, the GDP of the St. Louis metropolitan area has been increasing since 2001.

Area exposed to one or more hazards represented on the hazard map used for risk analysis of the RPP. The hazard map is the result of the study of hazards, the objective of which is to assess the intensity of each hazard at any point in the study area. The evaluation method is specific to each hazard type. It leads to the delimitation of a set of areas on the study perimeter constituting a zoning graduated according to the level of the hazard. The assignment of a hazard level at a given point in the territory takes into account the probability of occurrence of the dangerous phenomenon and its degree of intensity.For PPRTs the hazard levels are determined by effect effect on maps by type of effect and overall on an aggregated level on a synthesis map.All hazard areas represented on the hazard map are included. Areas protected by protective structures must be represented (possibly in a specific way) as they are always considered to be subject to hazard (cases of breakage or inadequacy of the structure).The hazard zones may be classified as data compiled in so far as they result from a synthesis using several sources of calculated, modelled or observed hazard data. These source data are not covered by this class of objects but by another standard dealing with the knowledge of hazards.Some areas of the study perimeter are considered “zero or insignificant hazard zones”. These are the areas where the hazard has been studied and is nil. These areas are not included in the object class and do not have to be represented as hazard zones.

This dataset (JDD) is part of a data set that describes land use constraints related to anthropogenic risks, including, for each constraint, the government services or communities to be consulted. The initial target corresponds to those involved in the management of urban planning who wish to know these constraints in a given area of the Greater East region. In the context of the procedure “Treatment of requests relating to constraints on land use due to anthropogenic risks”, which governs the consultations of the departmental units of DREAL and the Department of Anthropic Risk Prevention, a distinction is made between “transport pipelines for the transport of known dangerous materials” and “pipelines for the transport of dangerous materials in the process of being aware”. DREAL does not need to be consulted on the stresses induced by these pipes. The layer “known pipelines” represents the municipalities impacted by “known pipelines”. For each of these municipalities, it states: — The name of the municipality — The insee number of the municipality — The name of the carrier — The presence of Servitudes of Public Utility or Porters to Knowledge — The types of projects concerned by the public utility easement(s) or by the Porters à Connaissance — The service of the State concerned — The approach to obtain further information — The date of implementation of public easements — Description of the perimeter of the constraints — Regulatory sources of the perimeter of constraints — The sources of the data — The scale of the data — The internal contact SPRA — The date of the initial inventory — The dates of the update of the layer The objective of the layer and to make it possible to identify ‘known hazardous materials transport pipelines’, to make available the information described above, and in particular to direct any consultations to the relevant interlocutors. The data is intended for all persons who may consult the UDs and the SPRA on subjects related to anthropogenic risks, including the local authorities’ teaching services, the other departments of DREAL and the State, the notaries. Contact point: The agent of the Anthropic Risk Prevention Service (SPRA) in charge of operational planning. Name of the GIS layer: MU_CANA_CONNU_DREAL_R44.shp

Area exposed to one or more hazards represented on the hazard map used for risk analysis of the RPP. The hazard map is the result of the study of hazards, the objective of which is to assess the intensity of each hazard at any point in the study area. The evaluation method is specific to each hazard type. It leads to the delimitation of a set of areas on the study perimeter constituting a zoning graduated according to the level of the hazard. The assignment of a hazard level at a given point in the territory takes into account the probability of occurrence of the dangerous phenomenon and its degree of intensity.For PPRTs the hazard levels are determined by effect effect on maps by type of effect and overall on an aggregated level on a synthesis map.All hazard areas represented on the hazard map are included. Areas protected by protective structures must be represented (possibly in a specific way) as they are always considered to be subject to hazard (cases of breakage or inadequacy of the structure).The hazard zones may be classified as data compiled in so far as they result from a synthesis using several sources of calculated, modelled or observed hazard data. These source data are not covered by this class of objects but by another standard dealing with the knowledge of hazards.Some areas of the study perimeter are considered “zero or insignificant hazard zones”. These are the areas where the hazard has been studied and is nil. These areas are not included in the object class and do not have to be represented as hazard zones.