100+ datasets found
  1. 4

    MECAnalysisTool: A method to analyze consumer data

    • data.4tu.nl
    txt
    Updated Jul 6, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kirstin Foolen-Torgerson; Fleur Kilwinger (2022). MECAnalysisTool: A method to analyze consumer data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4121/19786900.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    4TU.ResearchData
    Authors
    Kirstin Foolen-Torgerson; Fleur Kilwinger
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This Excel based tool was developed to analyze means-end chain data. The tool consists of a user manual, a data input file to correctly organise your MEC data, a calculator file to analyse your data, and instructional videos. The purpose of this tool is to aggregate laddering data into hierarchical value maps showing means-end chains. The summarized results consist of (1) a summary overview, (2) a matrix, and (3) output for copy/pasting into NodeXL to generate hierarchal value maps (HVMs). To use this tool, you must have collected data via laddering interviews. Ladders are codes linked together consisting of attributes, consequences and values (ACVs).

  2. S1 Data -

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xlsx
    Updated Jan 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Farzana Jahan; Shovanur Haque; James Hogg; Aiden Price; Conor Hassan; Wala Areed; Helen Thompson; Jessica Cameron; Susanna M. Cramb (2025). S1 Data - [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313079.s001
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Farzana Jahan; Shovanur Haque; James Hogg; Aiden Price; Conor Hassan; Wala Areed; Helen Thompson; Jessica Cameron; Susanna M. Cramb
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundSpatial data are often aggregated by area to protect the confidentiality of individuals and aid the calculation of pertinent risks and rates. However, the analysis of spatially aggregated data is susceptible to the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP), which arises when inference varies with boundary or aggregation changes. While the impact of the MAUP has been examined previously, typically these studies have focused on well-populated areas. Understanding how the MAUP behaves when data are sparse is particularly important for countries with less populated areas, such as Australia. This study aims to assess different geographical regions’ vulnerability to the MAUP when data are relatively sparse to inform researchers’ choice of aggregation level for fitting spatial models.MethodsTo understand the impact of the MAUP in Queensland, Australia, the present study investigates inference from simulated lung cancer incidence data using the five levels of spatial aggregation defined by the Australian Statistical Geography Standard. To this end, Bayesian spatial BYM models with and without covariates were fitted.Results and conclusionThe MAUP impacted inference in the analysis of cancer counts for data aggregated to coarsest areal structures. However, area structures with moderate resolution were not greatly impacted by the MAUP, and offer advantages in terms of data sparsity, computational intensity and availability of data sets.

  3. d

    White River aggregate data and metadata

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2025). White River aggregate data and metadata [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/white-river-aggregate-data-and-metadata
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Description

    The data.zip dataset contains metadata and total suspended solids, total phosphorus, nitrate plus nitrite, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen concentration data and associated daily mean streamflow data for the White River at Muncie, near Nora, and near Centerton, Indiana, 1991-2017

  4. e

    Why do giraffes occur in aggregated dispersion patterns

    • knb.ecoinformatics.org
    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jan 6, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Du Toit (2015). Why do giraffes occur in aggregated dispersion patterns [Dataset]. https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/view/judithk.349.3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 6, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    SANParks Data Repository
    Authors
    Du Toit
    Time period covered
    Sep 11, 2004 - Jan 10, 2005
    Area covered
    Description

    The Giraffidae are represented by only two extant species, the okapi (Okapia johnstoni) and the giraffe. Both have unusual and poorly understood social systems (reviewed by Dagg & Foster 1976; du Toit 2001; Pellew 2001). Although giraffes are typically observed in aggregations, they appear to join, and to leave, them independently of others, suggesting that they do not form long-term social bonds. It may be that adaptive benefits usually ascribed to social species have exerted selective pressure on what are essentially asocial animals to aggregate in this way. These benefits might include foraging efficiency (Krebs & Davies 1997, and see Bertram 1980) and/or collective vigilance (Pulliam 1973; Elgar 1989). Alternatively, giraffes may perceive their social environment in ways that are difficult for human observers to identify (Cameron & du Toit 2005). It may be that their behaviour is modified, not by the composition of whole aggregations, but only by the identity of and distance to their immediate neighbour/s (see e.g. Treves 1998). It may also be, however, that they are able to maintain contact with one another over long distances by means of visual, olfactory and/or infrasonic signals and that they spend much more of their time in stable groups (as they perceive them) than has been appreciated hitherto. The purpose of this study is to investigate the first of these two possibilities and to contribute to the elucidation of the second. It arises from and will extend the work of Cameron and du Toit (2005).

    Hypotheses Null hypothesis: (asocial) giraffes co-occur at sites of localised resources e.g. food patches. Alternative hypotheses: benefits accrue to them (as in social species) from (i) sharing vigilance effort with others and/or (ii) from cueing on public information about food resources.

    Predictions 1. The frequency and/or duration of individual vigilance is expected to decrease as a function of increasing aggregation size. 2. The time individuals spend foraging is expected to increase as a function of increasing aggregation size.

    Research questions 1. Does aggregation size influence the time spent vigilant by individuals? 2. Does aggregation size influence the time spent foraging by individuals? 3. What is the frequency distribution of aggregation sizes? 4. What is the frequency distribution of aggregation compositions? 5. What is the frequency distribution of nearest/close neighbours distances? 6. What is the frequency distribution of nearest/close neighbours identities?

  5. The Organization of Tropical Rainfall: Observed convective aggregation data...

    • catalogue.ceda.ac.uk
    • data-search.nerc.ac.uk
    Updated Feb 9, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Christopher Holloway (2018). The Organization of Tropical Rainfall: Observed convective aggregation data across the Tropics [Dataset]. https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/f3f8337c838c4602876d43f56d878515
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 9, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Centre for Environmental Data Analysishttp://www.ceda.ac.uk/
    Authors
    Christopher Holloway
    License

    https://artefacts.ceda.ac.uk/licences/missing_licence.pdfhttps://artefacts.ceda.ac.uk/licences/missing_licence.pdf

    Time period covered
    Jun 14, 2006 - Apr 17, 2011
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset contains about 5 years of analysed observations regarding the degree of convective aggregation, or clumping, across the tropics - these are averaged onto a large-scale grid. There are also additional variables which represent environmental fields (e.g. sea surface temperature from satellite data, or humidity profiles averaged from reanalysis data) averaged onto the same large-scale grid. The main aggregation index is the Simple Convective Aggregation Index (SCAI) originally defined in Tobin et al. 2012, Journal of Climate. The data were created during the main years of CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite data so that they could be compared with vertical cloud profiles from this satellite data, and the results of this analysis appear in Stein et al. 2017, Journal of Climate.

    Each file is one year of data (although the year may not be complete).

    Each variable is an array: var(nlon, nlat, [nlev], ntime) longitude, latitude, pressure, time are variables in each file units are attributes of each variable (except non-dimensional ones) missing_value is 3.0E20 and is an attribute of each variable

    Time is in days since 19790101:00Z and is every 3hours at 00z, 03z, ... The actual temporal frequency of the data is described for each variable below.

    The data is for each 10deg X 10deg lat/lon box, 30S-30N (at outer edges of box domain), with each box defined by its centre coordinates and with boxes overlapping each other by 5deg in each direction.

    In general, each variable is a spatial average over each box, with the value set to missing if more than 15% of the box is missing data. Exceptions to this are given below. The most important exception is for the brightness temperature data, used in aggregation statistics, which is filled in using neighborhood averaging if no more than 5% of the pixels are missing, but otherwise is considered to be all missing data. The percentage of missing pixels is recorded in 'bt_miss_frac'.

  6. f

    Data from: Impact of Spatial Soil and Climate Input Data Aggregation on...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • plos.figshare.com
    Updated Apr 8, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Raynal, Helene; Grosz, Balázs; Ewert, Frank; Priesack, Eckart; Nendel, Claas; Teixeira, Edmar; Biernath, Christian; Doro, Luca; Dechow, Rene; Moriondo, Marco; Trombi, Giacomo; Siebert, Stefan; Eckersten, Henrik; Lewan, Elisabet; Bindi, Marco; Klein, Christian; Asseng, Senthold; Kuhnert, Matthias; Constantin, Julie; Rötter, Reimund P.; Hoffmann, Holger; Heinlein, Florian; Specka, Xenia; Coucheney, Elsa; Weihermüller, Lutz; Kassie, Belay T.; Zhao, Gang; Roggero, Pier P.; Tao, Fulu; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh; Wallach, Daniel; Gaiser, Thomas; Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian (2016). Impact of Spatial Soil and Climate Input Data Aggregation on Regional Yield Simulations [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0001505523
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 8, 2016
    Authors
    Raynal, Helene; Grosz, Balázs; Ewert, Frank; Priesack, Eckart; Nendel, Claas; Teixeira, Edmar; Biernath, Christian; Doro, Luca; Dechow, Rene; Moriondo, Marco; Trombi, Giacomo; Siebert, Stefan; Eckersten, Henrik; Lewan, Elisabet; Bindi, Marco; Klein, Christian; Asseng, Senthold; Kuhnert, Matthias; Constantin, Julie; Rötter, Reimund P.; Hoffmann, Holger; Heinlein, Florian; Specka, Xenia; Coucheney, Elsa; Weihermüller, Lutz; Kassie, Belay T.; Zhao, Gang; Roggero, Pier P.; Tao, Fulu; Yeluripati, Jagadeesh; Wallach, Daniel; Gaiser, Thomas; Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian
    Description

    We show the error in water-limited yields simulated by crop models which is associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate input data. Crop simulations at large scales (regional, national, continental) frequently use input data of low resolution. Therefore, climate and soil data are often generated via averaging and sampling by area majority. This may bias simulated yields at large scales, varying largely across models. Thus, we evaluated the error associated with spatially aggregated soil and climate data for 14 crop models. Yields of winter wheat and silage maize were simulated under water-limited production conditions. We calculated this error from crop yields simulated at spatial resolutions from 1 to 100 km for the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Most models showed yields biased by <15% when aggregating only soil data. The relative mean absolute error (rMAE) of most models using aggregated soil data was in the range or larger than the inter-annual or inter-model variability in yields. This error increased further when both climate and soil data were aggregated. Distinct error patterns indicate that the rMAE may be estimated from few soil variables. Illustrating the range of these aggregation effects across models, this study is a first step towards an ex-ante assessment of aggregation errors in large-scale simulations.

  7. RENT Aggregate and Mean and Median Gross Rent NMHD 2000

    • catalog.data.gov
    • gimi9.com
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 2, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geographic Products Management Branch (Point of Contact) (2020). RENT Aggregate and Mean and Median Gross Rent NMHD 2000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/rent-aggregate-and-mean-and-median-gross-rent-nmhd-2000
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 2, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Description

    The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the Census TIGER database. The geographic coverage for a single TIGER/Line file is a county or statistical equivalent entity, with the coverage area based on the latest available governmental unit boundaries. The Census TIGER database represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts. However, each county-based TIGER/Line file is designed to stand alone as an independent data set or the files can be combined to cover the whole Nation. The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files consist of line segments representing physical features and governmental and statistical boundaries. This shapefile represents the current State House Districts for New Mexico as posted on the Census Bureau website for 2006.

  8. f

    Iris data aggregation class effect.

    • figshare.com
    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 5, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yaling Zhang; Jin Han (2023). Iris data aggregation class effect. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248737.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 5, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Yaling Zhang; Jin Han
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Iris data aggregation class effect.

  9. f

    Data from: False Discovery Rates to Detect Signals from Incomplete Spatially...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • tandf.figshare.com
    Updated Jan 25, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cressie, Noel; Zammit-Mangion, Andrew; Huang, Hsin-Cheng; Huang, Guowen (2021). False Discovery Rates to Detect Signals from Incomplete Spatially Aggregated Data [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000802859
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 25, 2021
    Authors
    Cressie, Noel; Zammit-Mangion, Andrew; Huang, Hsin-Cheng; Huang, Guowen
    Description

    There are a number of ways to test for the absence/presence of a spatial signal in a completely observed fine-resolution image. One of these is a powerful nonparametric procedure called enhanced false discovery rate (EFDR). A drawback of EFDR is that it requires the data to be defined on regular pixels in a rectangular spatial domain. Here, we develop an EFDR procedure for possibly incomplete data defined on irregular small areas. Motivated by statistical learning, we use conditional simulation (CS) to condition on the available data and simulate the full rectangular image at its finest resolution many times (M, say). EFDR is then applied to each of these simulations resulting in M estimates of the signal and M statistically dependent p-values. Averaging over these estimates yields a single, combined estimate of a possible signal, but inference is needed to determine whether there really is a signal present. We test the original null hypothesis of no signal by combining the M p-values into a single p-value using copulas and a composite likelihood. If the null hypothesis of no signal is rejected, we use the combined estimate. We call this new procedure EFDR-CS and, to demonstrate its effectiveness, we show results from a simulation study; an experiment where we introduce aggregation and incompleteness into temperature-change data in the Asia-Pacific; and an application to total-column carbon dioxide from satellite remote sensing data over a region of the Middle East, Afghanistan, and the western part of Pakistan. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

  10. H

    Replication Data for: When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and Its...

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Sep 18, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jonathan Slapin; René Lindstädt; Sven-Oliver Proksch (2018). Replication Data for: When Experts Disagree: Response Aggregation and Its Consequences in Expert Surveys [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TJ5XMF
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Sep 18, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Jonathan Slapin; René Lindstädt; Sven-Oliver Proksch
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Political scientists use expert surveys to assess latent features of political actors. Experts, though, are unlikely to be equally informed and assess all actors equally well. The literature acknowledges variance in measurement quality, but pays little attention to the implications of uncertainty for aggregating responses. We discuss the nature of the measurement problem in expert surveys. We then propose methods to assess the ability of experts to judge where actors stand and to aggregate expert responses. We examine the effects of aggregation for a prominent survey in the literature on party politics and EU integration. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, we demonstrate that it is better to aggregate expert responses using the median or modal response, rather than the mean.

  11. e

    Map Viewing Service (WMS) of the dataset: Aggregation generic tables noise...

    • data.europa.eu
    wms
    Updated Feb 27, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Map Viewing Service (WMS) of the dataset: Aggregation generic tables noise zones type A Lden index in Héault [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/fr-120066022-srv-66f550ee-8fe6-4997-98a1-68fcce8e3712?locale=en
    Explore at:
    wmsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 27, 2022
    Description

    Aggregation of generic tables describing the Noise Zones for all terrestrial infrastructure, map type A and Lden index. ‘Type a’ exposure cards: maps to be made within the framework of the CBS pursuant to Article 3-II-1°-a of the Decree of 24 March 2006. This is a dataset representing for the year of mapping: — areas exposed to more than 55 dB(A) in Lden They represent the isophone curves of 5 in 5 dB(A). Lden: sound level indicator means Level Day-Evening-Night. It corresponds to an equivalent 24-hour sound level in which evening and night noise levels are increased by 5 and 10 dB(A), respectively, to reflect greater discomfort during these periods. Aggregation obtained by the QGIS MIZOGEO plugin made available by CEREMA. Data source by infrastructure: CEREMA.

  12. Geometry and Opacity Data for Fractal Aggregates

    • zenodo.org
    bin, png, txt, zip
    Updated Sep 11, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Frank Ferguson; Frank Ferguson; John Paquette; Joseph Nuth; John Paquette; Joseph Nuth (2024). Geometry and Opacity Data for Fractal Aggregates [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13743508
    Explore at:
    bin, png, zip, txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Frank Ferguson; Frank Ferguson; John Paquette; Joseph Nuth; John Paquette; Joseph Nuth
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    The tables in this data set may be used to calculate the radiative pressure on fractal dust grains under Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) conditions (with a peak stellar wavelength of ~ 1 micron) for aggregates containing up to 256 primary particles. Data are calculated for three common dust materials: forsterite, (Mg2SiO4), olivine, (Mg_(2x)Fe_(2(1-x))SiO4) with x=0.5, and 'astronomical silicate' (B.T. Draine and H.M. Lee, Optical Properties of Interstellar Graphite and Silicate Grains, Astrophysical Journal, 1984).
    Example fractal aggregates were generated using the Diffusion Limited Aggregation (DLA) code as described in Wozniak M., Onofri F.R.A., Barbosa S., Yon J., Mroczka J., Comparison of methods to derive morphological parameters of multi-fractal samples of particle aggregates from TEM images, Journal of Aerosol Science 47: 12–26 (2012) and Onofri F.R.A., M. Wozniak, S. Barbosa, On the Optical Characterization of Nanoparticle and their Aggregates in Plasma Systems, Contributions to Plasma Physics 51(2-3):228-236 (2011). Aggregates were generated with a constant prefactor, kf=1.3, and two fractal dimensions (Df), representing open, porous (Df=1.8) aggregates and more compact (Df=2.8) aggregates.
    The geometry files were produced with the DLA software. An example run using this software is shown for aggregates with 256 primary particles and a fractal dimension of 2.8 in the file 'dla_example.png'
    The number of primary particles in the aggregate, N, was sampled up to 256. In each case 12 instances of each aggregate size were generated with primary particles having a radius of 0.5. These geometry data are given in:
    aggregates_kf1.3_df1.8.zip --> Geometry for a prefactor of 1.3 and fractal dimension 1.8
    aggregates_kf1.3_df2.8.zip --> Geometry for a prefactor of 1.3 and fractal dimension 2.8
    An example file name for an aggregate is 'N_00000032_Agg_00000008.dat' where the first number is the number of primary particles in the aggregate (N=32) and the second number is the instance number (e.g. 8 of 12).
    These geometry data were then used to calculate the opacity of the aggregates using the Multiple Sphere T-Matrix code (MSTM v 3.0) developed by Daniel Mackowski (D.W. Mackowski, M.I. Mishchenko, A multiple sphere T-matrix Fortran code for use on parallel computer clusters, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Volume 112, Issue 13, 2011). Data were generated using the first 10 instances of each aggregate size, and the geometry data were appropriately scaled to calculate the opacity data for primary particle radii ranging from 0.001 - 1.0 microns and covering the spectrum of a typical AGB star (0.3 to 30 microns wavelength). By default, MSTM calculations are made along the z-axis of the geometry data. Additional calculations were made along the x and y axes for each aggregate. Therefore the final data set is the average of 30 values (10 instances each in the x,y,z directions).
    The opacity data files are:
    astronomical_silicate_df1.8 --> astronomical silicate aggregates with fractal dimension 1.8
    astronomical_silicate_df2.8 --> astronomical silicate aggregates with fractal dimension 2.8
    forsterite_df1.8 --> forsterite aggregates with fractal dimension 1.8
    forsterite_df2.8 --> forsterite aggregates with fractal dimension 2.8
    olivine_df1.8 --> olivine aggregates with fractal dimension 1.8
    olivine_df2.8 --> olivine aggregates with fractal dimension 2.8
    The first lines of the files give a header starting with the '#' character describing the table and the source of the optical data used.
    After the header, the first line of data in the table has the following six values giving the range for the data table and number of samples in N, (aggregate size), primary particle radius (microns) and wavelength (microns). These are:
    Minimum aggregate size
    Maximum aggregate size
    Number of Aggregate samples
    Primary Particle Minimum Radius (microns)
    Primary Particle Maximum Radius (microns)
    Number of Primary Particle radii samples
    Wavelength minimum (microns)
    Wavelength maximum (microns)
    Number of Wavelength samples
    Subsequent lines contain 13 columns. These columns give the efficiency factors and asymmetry factor for aggregates. These efficiency factors are based on the effective radius of the aggregate given by:
    a_eff = a_primary*N^(1/3)
    where a_primary is the primary particle radius and N is the number of primary particles in the aggregate.
    For example, the absorption opacity of an aggregate would then be = pi*a_eff^2 * Q_abs.
    The values in each column are:
    Column 1: Primary particle radius in microns
    Column 2: Wavelength in microns
    Column 3: Number of primary particles in aggregate
    Column 4: Mean Q_ext, mean extinction efficiency factor
    Column 5: Standard Deviation of Mean Q_ext
    Column 6: Mean Q_abs, mean absorption efficiency factor
    Column 7: Standard Deviation of Mean Q_abs
    Column 8: Mean Q_sca, mean scattering efficiency factor
    Column 9: Standard Deviation of mean Q_sca
    Column 10: Mean g_cos, mean asymmetry factor
    Column 11: Standard Deviation of mean asymmetry factor
    Column 12: Mean Q_pr, mean radiation pressure efficiency factor
    Column 13: Standard Deviation of mean
  13. HOME VALUE Aggregate and Mean and Median Value NMSD 2000

    • catalog.data.gov
    • gstore.unm.edu
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 2, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geographic Products Management Branch (Point of Contact) (2020). HOME VALUE Aggregate and Mean and Median Value NMSD 2000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/home-value-aggregate-and-mean-and-median-value-nmsd-2000
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 2, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Description

    The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the Census TIGER database. The geographic coverage for a single TIGER/Line file is a county or statistical equivalent entity, with the coverage area based on the latest available governmental unit boundaries. The Census TIGER database represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts. However, each county-based TIGER/Line file is designed to stand alone as an independent data set or the files can be combined to cover the whole Nation. The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files consist of line segments representing physical features and governmental and statistical boundaries. This shapefile represents the current State Senate Districts for New Mexico as posted on the Census Bureau website for 2006.

  14. Poker Flop Aggregations

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Mar 5, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chris (2023). Poker Flop Aggregations [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/chrisjackson7/5ph-aggregations
    Explore at:
    zip(2526988 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 5, 2023
    Authors
    Chris
    License

    https://cdla.io/permissive-1-0/https://cdla.io/permissive-1-0/

    Description

    This dataset contains 4 files with aggregated poker data from the flop. The original dataset consists of ~26M rows of all 5 card combinations of hands, evaluated to a rank between 1 and 7462. There are two rank distribution files, one with the data aggregated by the starting hand, the other by the flop. The weighted files contain a weighted mean of these rank distributions, roughly based on the 7 card hand type distribution.

    To access these compressed files, simply use the pandas 'read_pickle()' method. To find an example, you can reference the documentation or my Poker Analysis notebook. Please note, the rank distribution files are very sparse and may need to be converted to a dense dataframe depending on what you're doing.

  15. Z

    Data for "Predicting aggregate morphology of sequence-defined macromolecules...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jun 17, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bhattacharya, Debjyoti; Kleeblatt, Devon; Statt, Antonia; Reinhart, Wesley (2022). Data for "Predicting aggregate morphology of sequence-defined macromolecules with Recurrent Neural Networks" [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_6585653
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 17, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Pennsylvania State University
    Authors
    Bhattacharya, Debjyoti; Kleeblatt, Devon; Statt, Antonia; Reinhart, Wesley
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    These are the data associated with the paper, "Predicting aggregate morphology of sequence-defined macromolecules with Recurrent Neural Networks" (DOI 10.1039/D2SM00452F). Three of the directories contains subdirectories with GSD files dumped from HOOMD. The other contains pretrained RNN models as TorchScript binaries exported from PyTorch.

  16. d

    Factori AI & ML Training Data | People Data | USA | Machine Learning Data

    • datarade.ai
    .json, .csv
    Updated Jul 23, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Factori (2022). Factori AI & ML Training Data | People Data | USA | Machine Learning Data [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/factori-ai-ml-training-data-consumer-data-usa-machine-factori
    Explore at:
    .json, .csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 23, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Factori
    Area covered
    United States of America
    Description

    Our People data is gathered and aggregated via surveys, digital services, and public data sources. We use powerful profiling algorithms to collect and ingest only fresh and reliable data points.

    Our comprehensive data enrichment solution includes a variety of data sets that can help you address gaps in your customer data, gain a deeper understanding of your customers, and power superior client experiences.

    1. Geography - City, State, ZIP, County, CBSA, Census Tract, etc.
    2. Demographics - Gender, Age Group, Marital Status, Language etc.
    3. Financial - Income Range, Credit Rating Range, Credit Type, Net worth Range, etc
    4. Persona - Consumer type, Communication preferences, Family type, etc
    5. Interests - Content, Brands, Shopping, Hobbies, Lifestyle etc.
    6. Household - Number of Children, Number of Adults, IP Address, etc.
    7. Behaviours - Brand Affinity, App Usage, Web Browsing etc.
    8. Firmographics - Industry, Company, Occupation, Revenue, etc
    9. Retail Purchase - Store, Category, Brand, SKU, Quantity, Price etc.
    10. Auto - Car Make, Model, Type, Year, etc.
    11. Housing - Home type, Home value, Renter/Owner, Year Built etc.

    People Data Schema & Reach: Our data reach represents the total number of counts available within various categories and comprises attributes such as country location, MAU, DAU & Monthly Location Pings:

    Data Export Methodology: Since we collect data dynamically, we provide the most updated data and insights via a best-suited method on a suitable interval (daily/weekly/monthly).

    People data Use Cases:

    360-Degree Customer View: Get a comprehensive image of customers by the means of internal and external data aggregation. Data Enrichment: Leverage Online to offline consumer profiles to build holistic audience segments to improve campaign targeting using user data enrichment Fraud Detection: Use multiple digital (web and mobile) identities to verify real users and detect anomalies or fraudulent activity. Advertising & Marketing: Understand audience demographics, interests, lifestyle, hobbies, and behaviors to build targeted marketing campaigns.

    Here's the schema of People Data: person_id first_name last_name age gender linkedin_url twitter_url facebook_url city state address zip zip4 country delivery_point_bar_code carrier_route walk_seuqence_code fips_state_code fips_country_code country_name latitude longtiude address_type metropolitan_statistical_area core_based+statistical_area census_tract census_block_group census_block primary_address pre_address streer post_address address_suffix address_secondline address_abrev census_median_home_value home_market_value property_build+year property_with_ac property_with_pool property_with_water property_with_sewer general_home_value property_fuel_type year month household_id Census_median_household_income household_size marital_status length+of_residence number_of_kids pre_school_kids single_parents working_women_in_house_hold homeowner children adults generations net_worth education_level occupation education_history credit_lines credit_card_user newly_issued_credit_card_user credit_range_new
    credit_cards loan_to_value mortgage_loan2_amount mortgage_loan_type
    mortgage_loan2_type mortgage_lender_code
    mortgage_loan2_render_code
    mortgage_lender mortgage_loan2_lender
    mortgage_loan2_ratetype mortgage_rate
    mortgage_loan2_rate donor investor interest buyer hobby personal_email work_email devices phone employee_title employee_department employee_job_function skills recent_job_change company_id company_name company_description technologies_used office_address office_city office_country office_state office_zip5 office_zip4 office_carrier_route office_latitude office_longitude office_cbsa_code
    office_census_block_group
    office_census_tract office_county_code
    company_phone
    company_credit_score
    company_csa_code
    company_dpbc
    company_franchiseflag
    company_facebookurl company_linkedinurl company_twitterurl
    company_website company_fortune_rank
    company_government_type company_headquarters_branch company_home_business
    company_industry
    company_num_pcs_used
    company_num_employees
    company_firm_individual company_msa company_msa_name
    company_naics_code
    company_naics_description
    company_naics_code2 company_naics_description2
    company_sic_code2
    company_sic_code2_description
    company_sic_code4 company_sic_code4_description
    company_sic_code6
    company_sic_code6_description
    company_sic_code8
    company_sic_code8_description company_parent_company
    company_parent_company_location company_public_private company_subsidiary_company company_residential_business_code company_revenue_at_side_code company_revenue_range
    company_revenue company_sales_volume
    company_small_business company_stock_ticker company_year_founded company_minorityowned
    company_female_owned_or_operated company_franchise_code company_dma company_dma_name
    company_hq_address
    company_hq_city company_hq_duns company_hq_state
    company_hq_zip5 company_hq_zip4 company_se...

  17. G

    Broadband Aggregation Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Aug 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Broadband Aggregation Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/broadband-aggregation-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pptx, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 29, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Broadband Aggregation Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global broadband aggregation market size is valued at USD 14.2 billion in 2024, exhibiting robust momentum with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.7% from 2025 to 2033. The market is expected to reach USD 29.8 billion by 2033, driven by the surging demand for high-speed internet connectivity, rapid digitization across sectors, and the proliferation of smart devices. As per our in-depth analysis, the primary growth factor stems from the continuous expansion of broadband infrastructure and the increasing need for efficient data traffic management worldwide.




    One of the pivotal growth drivers for the broadband aggregation market is the exponential surge in data consumption, propelled by the widespread adoption of video streaming, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things (IoT). With more households and businesses relying on bandwidth-intensive applications, service providers are compelled to invest in advanced aggregation solutions to optimize network performance and minimize latency. The rise of remote work and online education has further intensified the need for robust broadband networks, prompting governments and private enterprises to prioritize network upgrades and expansions. This persistent demand is fostering innovation in aggregation hardware and software, enabling seamless integration of diverse access technologies and supporting the scalability required for next-generation broadband services.




    Another significant growth factor is the evolution of network architectures, notably the transition to 5G and the deployment of fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP) infrastructure. These advancements necessitate sophisticated broadband aggregation solutions capable of consolidating multiple access points and efficiently routing massive volumes of data traffic. The integration of software-defined networking (SDN) and network function virtualization (NFV) is further revolutionizing the market, allowing operators to dynamically manage network resources and enhance service agility. The convergence of fixed and mobile networks is also driving the adoption of unified broadband aggregation platforms, enabling service providers to deliver consistent user experiences across various access technologies.




    The market is also benefiting from strategic collaborations and investments aimed at bridging the digital divide in underserved regions. Governments and international organizations are launching initiatives to expand broadband coverage in rural and remote areas, creating lucrative opportunities for broadband aggregation vendors. These efforts are complemented by the growing emphasis on smart city projects, which require resilient and scalable broadband infrastructure to support connected devices, public safety applications, and digital services. The increasing focus on cybersecurity and data privacy is further shaping the market landscape, prompting the development of secure aggregation solutions that safeguard critical network assets.



    Broadband Services are at the heart of this digital transformation, providing the backbone for high-speed internet access that powers both residential and commercial applications. As consumers and businesses alike demand faster and more reliable internet connections, broadband services are evolving to meet these needs through innovative technologies and infrastructure upgrades. This evolution is not only enhancing user experiences but also enabling new applications and services that were previously unimaginable. From streaming high-definition content to supporting complex business operations, broadband services are essential for maintaining competitiveness in today's digital economy.




    Regionally, the Asia Pacific market is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by large-scale infrastructure projects in China, India, and Southeast Asia. North America and Europe remain significant contributors, driven by early adoption of advanced broadband technologies and strong investments in network modernization. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging as promising markets, supported by government-led broadband expansion programs and rising demand for digital services. This regional diversity reflects the global imperative to enhance internet accessibility and quality, positioning

  18. g

    Aggregate extraction area

    • geohub.lio.gov.on.ca
    • community-esrica-apps.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Nov 20, 2008
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Land Information Ontario (2008). Aggregate extraction area [Dataset]. https://geohub.lio.gov.on.ca/datasets/lio::aggregate-extraction-area/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 20, 2008
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Land Information Ontario
    License

    https://www.ontario.ca/page/open-government-licence-ontariohttps://www.ontario.ca/page/open-government-licence-ontario

    Area covered
    Description

    This spatial dataset represents areas where resources may be extracted within the limits of the aggregate licence or permit for the associated site. Reporting requirements are optional, which means records will be sporadic and limited to certain areas of the province.

    Additional details related to aggregates in Ontario are available in related data classes as well as online using the interactive Pits and Quarries map.

    Additional Documentation

      Aggregate Extraction Area - Data Description (PDF)
      Aggregate Extraction Area - Documentation (Word)
    

    Status

    On going: data is being continually updated

    Maintenance and Update Frequency

    As needed: data is updated as deemed necessary

    Contact

    Ryan Lenethen, Integration Branch, ryan.lenethen@ontario.ca

  19. e

    Map Viewing Service (WMS) of the dataset: Aggregation generic tables road...

    • data.europa.eu
    unknown
    Updated Feb 22, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Map Viewing Service (WMS) of the dataset: Aggregation generic tables road noise zones type A index D — Tarn [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/fr-120066022-srv-9d2e29a7-a4f5-49c8-84bd-5b24cd5ed63e
    Explore at:
    unknownAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 22, 2022
    Description

    Aggregation of generic tables describing the Noise Zones, for an infrastructure, the type of infrastructure concerned ROUTE (R), card type A and LD index.

    Road infrastructure concerned: A68, C1_albi, C1_castres, D100, D1012, D13, D612, D622, D630, D631, D69, D800, D81, D84, D87, D88, D912, D926, D968, D988, D999A, D999, N112, N126, N88

    ‘Type a’ exposure cards: maps to be made within the framework of the CBS pursuant to Article 3-II-1°-a of the Decree of 24 March 2006. These are two cards representing the year in which the cards were drawn up: — areas exposed to more than 55 dB(A) in Lden They represent the isophone curves of 5 in 5 dB(A).

    Lden sound level indicator means Level Day-Evening-Night. It corresponds to an equivalent 24-hour sound level in which evening and night noise levels are increased by 5 and 10 dB(A), respectively, to reflect greater discomfort during these periods.

    Aggregation obtained by the QGIS MIZOGEO plugin made available by CEREMA.

    Data source by infrastructure: CEREMA.

  20. Z

    Data from: Open-data release of aggregated Australian school-level...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    Updated Jan 24, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Monteiro Lobato, (2020). Open-data release of aggregated Australian school-level information. Edition 2016.1 [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_46086
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2020
    Authors
    Monteiro Lobato,
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    The file set is a freely downloadable aggregation of information about Australian schools. The individual files represent a series of tables which, when considered together, form a relational database. The records cover the years 2008-2014 and include information on approximately 9500 primary and secondary school main-campuses and around 500 subcampuses. The records all relate to school-level data; no data about individuals is included. All the information has previously been published and is publicly available but it has not previously been released as a documented, useful aggregation. The information includes: (a) the names of schools (b) staffing levels, including full-time and part-time teaching and non-teaching staff (c) student enrolments, including the number of boys and girls (d) school financial information, including Commonwealth government, state government, and private funding (e) test data, potentially for school years 3, 5, 7 and 9, relating to an Australian national testing programme know by the trademark 'NAPLAN'

    Documentation of this Edition 2016.1 is incomplete but the organization of the data should be readily understandable to most people. If you are a researcher, the simplest way to study the data is to make use of the SQLite3 database called 'school-data-2016-1.db'. If you are unsure how to use an SQLite database, ask a guru.

    The database was constructed directly from the other included files by running the following command at a command-line prompt: sqlite3 school-data-2016-1.db < school-data-2016-1.sql Note that a few, non-consequential, errors will be reported if you run this command yourself. The reason for the errors is that the SQLite database is created by importing a series of '.csv' files. Each of the .csv files contains a header line with the names of the variable relevant to each column. The information is useful for many statistical packages but it is not what SQLite expects, so it complains about the header. Despite the complaint, the database will be created correctly.

    Briefly, the data are organized as follows. (a) The .csv files ('comma separated values') do not actually use a comma as the field delimiter. Instead, the vertical bar character '|' (ASCII Octal 174 Decimal 124 Hex 7C) is used. If you read the .csv files using Microsoft Excel, Open Office, or Libre Office, you will need to set the field-separator to be '|'. Check your software documentation to understand how to do this. (b) Each school-related record is indexed by an identifer called 'ageid'. The ageid uniquely identifies each school and consequently serves as the appropriate variable for JOIN-ing records in different data files. For example, the first school-related record after the header line in file 'students-headed-bar.csv' shows the ageid of the school as 40000. The relevant school name can be found by looking in the file 'ageidtoname-headed-bar.csv' to discover that the the ageid of 40000 corresponds to a school called 'Corpus Christi Catholic School'. (3) In addition to the variable 'ageid' each record is also identified by one or two 'year' variables. The most important purpose of a year identifier will be to indicate the year that is relevant to the record. For example, if one turn again to file 'students-headed-bar.csv', one sees that the first seven school-related records after the header line all relate to the school Corpus Christi Catholic School with ageid of 40000. The variable that identifies the important differences between these seven records is the variable 'studentyear'. 'studentyear' shows the year to which the student data refer. One can see, for example, that in 2008, there were a total of 410 students enrolled, of whom 185 were girls and 225 were boys (look at the variable names in the header line). (4) The variables relating to years are given different names in each of the different files ('studentsyear' in the file 'students-headed-bar.csv', 'financesummaryyear' in the file 'financesummary-headed-bar.csv'). Despite the different names, the year variables provide the second-level means for joining information acrosss files. For example, if you wanted to relate the enrolments at a school in each year to its financial state, you might wish to JOIN records using 'ageid' in the two files and, secondarily, matching 'studentsyear' with 'financialsummaryyear'. (5) The manipulation of the data is most readily done using the SQL language with the SQLite database but it can also be done in a variety of statistical packages. (6) It is our intention for Edition 2016-2 to create large 'flat' files suitable for use by non-researchers who want to view the data with spreadsheet software. The disadvantage of such 'flat' files is that they contain vast amounts of redundant information and might not display the data in the form that the user most wants it. (7) Geocoding of the schools is not available in this edition. (8) Some files, such as 'sector-headed-bar.csv' are not used in the creation of the database but are provided as a convenience for researchers who might wish to recode some of the data to remove redundancy. (9) A detailed example of a suitable SQLite query can be found in the file 'school-data-sqlite-example.sql'. The same query, used in the context of analyses done with the excellent, freely available R statistical package (http://www.r-project.org) can be seen in the file 'school-data-with-sqlite.R'.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Kirstin Foolen-Torgerson; Fleur Kilwinger (2022). MECAnalysisTool: A method to analyze consumer data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4121/19786900.v1

MECAnalysisTool: A method to analyze consumer data

Related Article
Explore at:
2 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
txtAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jul 6, 2022
Dataset provided by
4TU.ResearchData
Authors
Kirstin Foolen-Torgerson; Fleur Kilwinger
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

This Excel based tool was developed to analyze means-end chain data. The tool consists of a user manual, a data input file to correctly organise your MEC data, a calculator file to analyse your data, and instructional videos. The purpose of this tool is to aggregate laddering data into hierarchical value maps showing means-end chains. The summarized results consist of (1) a summary overview, (2) a matrix, and (3) output for copy/pasting into NodeXL to generate hierarchal value maps (HVMs). To use this tool, you must have collected data via laddering interviews. Ladders are codes linked together consisting of attributes, consequences and values (ACVs).

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu