Facebook
TwitterThis checklist serves to guide a general review of a data package submitted to the Eawag Research Data Repository. A General review, as opposed to a domain specific review can be conducted by people without expertise in the scientific field the data package relates to.
Facebook
TwitterA sampling of reports from all aviation arenas referencing checklist issues (design, procedures, distraction, etc.).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Observational studies are based on systematic observation, understood as an organized recording and quantification of behavior in its natural context. Applied to the specific area of sports, observational studies present advantages when comparing studies based on other designs, such as the flexibility for adapting to different contexts and the possibility of using non-standardized instruments as well as a high degree of development in specific software and data analysis. Although the importance and usefulness of sports-related observational studies have been widely shown, there is no checklist to report these studies. Consequently, authors do not have a guide to follow in order to include all of the important elements in an observational study in sports areas, and reviewers do not have a reference tool for assessing this type of work. To resolve these issues, this article aims to develop a checklist to measure the quality of sports-related observational studies based on a content validity study. The participants were 22 judges with at least 3 years of experience in observational studies, sports areas, and methodology. They evaluated a list of 60 items systematically selected and classified into 12 dimensions. They were asked to score four aspects of each item on 5-point Likert scales to measure the following dimensions: representativeness, relevance, utility, and feasibility. The judges also had an open-format section for comments. The Osterlind index was calculated for each item and for each of the four aspects. Items were considered appropriate when obtaining a score of at least 0.5 in the four assessed aspects. After considering these inclusion criteria and all of the open-format comments, the resultant checklist consisted of 54 items grouped into the same initial 12 dimensions. Finally, we highlight the strengths of this work. We also present its main limitation: the need to apply the resultant checklist to obtain data and, thus, increase quality indicators of its psychometric properties. For this reason, as relevant actions for further development, we encourage expert readers to use it and provide feedback; we plan to apply it to different sport areas.
Facebook
TwitterInitial data analysis checklist for data screening in longitudinal studies.
Facebook
TwitterFish collections made at Buck Island Reef National Monument with the ichthyocide rotenone in 2001 at 58 stations followed by 10 days each in April 2011 and January 2012 surveying poorly sampled shoreline habitats with rotenone and clove oil and inland streams with seine.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Do you want to know what you need to arrange, what your rights are and whether you are entitled to anything? Fill in your personal situation and create your own checklist.The datasets in the API come from the content tools system.
Here you will find checklists such as: checklist retires, divorces or breaks up, becoming unemployed, death of partner or older, becoming 18 years old.
Facebook
TwitterSubscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
case report about a rare mutation
Facebook
TwitterChecklist of biodiversity of Hong Kong in CSV format
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Fish species found in the Wadden Sea since 1960 ( * Fresh water species). Surveys in which the species were encountered: a. DYFS, b. DFS, c. Stow net Schleswig-Holstein, d. Stow net Lower-Saxony, e. Stow net Elbe, f. Witte & Zijlstra (1978), g. Atlas Schleswig-Holstein, h. Red List Germany (Fricke et al., 1994).
Facebook
TwitterThis checklist describes all the required elements of states' fiscal year 2014 Annual Progress and Services Reports (APSRs). Metadata-only record linking to the original dataset. Open original dataset below.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Ad hoc checklist of alien species in Belgium is a species checklist dataset published by the Research Institute of Nature and Forest (INBO). It was specifically created for the TrIAS project (Tracking Invasive Alien Species, http://trias-project.be) to account for gaps in the alien species coverage in other species checklists for Belgium and mainly includes taxonomic groups and newly introduced species not covered elsewhere (yet). Due to its ad hoc nature, the list might change substantially over time. Here it is published as a standardized Darwin Core Archive and includes for each species: the scientific name, higher classification and stable taxon identifier (in the taxon core), the (confidence regarding the) presence of the species in Belgium (and its regions), the date of first introduction and last assessment (in the distribution extension), coarse habitat information (in the species profile extension), the pathway(s) of introduction, native range(s) and invasion stage in Belgium (in the description extension), and an overview of the consulted literature for each taxon (in the literature references extension). Issues with the dataset can be reported at https://github.com/trias-project/ad-hoc-checklist
We have released this dataset to the public domain under a Creative Commons Zero waiver. We would appreciate it if you follow the INBO norms for data use (https://www.inbo.be/en/norms-data-use) when using the data. If you have any questions regarding this dataset, don't hesitate to contact us via the contact information provided in the metadata or via opendata@inbo.be.
This dataset was published as open data for the TrIAS project (Tracking Invasive Alien Species http://trias-project.be, Vanderhoeven et al. 2017), with technical support provided by the Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO). It is selected as one of the authoritative sources for the compilation of a unified and reproducible checklist of alien species in Belgium.
Facebook
TwitterIt has been ten years since the last comprehensive assessment of non-native marine fishes in Florida. Herein, we report sightings of 41 species from Florida coastal waters since the earliest sighting in 1984.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Presentation of the 32 items on the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. The information is used for the report on a focus group that was conducted as part of the development of a process-driven prototyping apporach for data enrichment.
Facebook
TwitterThis checklist describes all the required elements of tribes' fiscal year 2016 Annual Progress and Services Reports (APSRs).
Metadata-only record linking to the original dataset. Open original dataset below.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
List of species of lichens and lichenicolous fungi that are found in the territory of the Provalskyi steppe (Luhansk Nature Reserve of NASU, Ukraine)
Facebook
TwitterThis checklist describes all the required elements of states' CFSPs and APSRs. It was developed to help states ensure their submissions include all required elements. Items on the checklist have been shortened; see Program Instruction ACYF-CB-PI-20-02 for a complete description.
Metadata-only record linking to the original dataset. Open original dataset below.
Facebook
TwitterThis checklist was developed to ensure that APSR submissions include all required elements. States can use this checklist as a guide in writing their 2019 APSR and CAPTA update.
Metadata-only record linking to the original dataset. Open original dataset below.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://eidc.ac.uk/licences/ogl/plainhttps://eidc.ac.uk/licences/ogl/plain
The UK Checklist of Freshwater Species is a collation of all the species (apart from algae) known to be found in association with fresh waters in the United Kingdom. The following eight major groups were identified as being associated with fresh waters in the UK: algae, amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, macrophytes, mammals and reptiles. Algae (except stoneworts) were not included in the UK Checklist of Freshwater Species as they are currently undergoing a major revision. Other microorganisms (bacteria, fungi and viruses) are also not included in this species list. The checklist was compiled to allow querying of freshwater species data in the Biological Records Centre (BRC) but to also to query freshwater species data from the BRC via the UK Lakes Portal (https://eip.ceh.ac.uk/apps/lakes/), as well as to update the freshwater species list supplied to the UK Species Inventory (UKSI) partners, such as Recorder 6, National Biodiversity Network (NBN) Atlas and iRecord.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Colonnelli, Enzo (2003): A revised checklist of Italian Curculionoidea (Coleoptera). Zootaxa 337 (1): 1-142, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.337.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.337.1.1
Facebook
TwitterThis checklist serves to guide a general review of a data package submitted to the Eawag Research Data Repository. A General review, as opposed to a domain specific review can be conducted by people without expertise in the scientific field the data package relates to.