Sample data for exercises in Further Adventures in Data Cleaning.

Dataset

This dataset was created by George M122

Contents

Access and clean an open source herbarium dataset using Excel or RStudio.

This dataset is a cleaned and preprocessed version of the original Netflix Movies and TV Shows dataset available on Kaggle. All cleaning was done using Microsoft Excel — no programming involved.

🎯 What’s Included: - Cleaned Excel file (standardized columns, proper date format, removed duplicates/missing values) - A separate "formulas_used.txt" file listing all Excel formulas used during cleaning (e.g., TRIM, CLEAN, DATE, SUBSTITUTE, TEXTJOIN, etc.) - Columns like 'date_added' have been properly formatted into DMY structure - Multi-valued columns like 'listed_in' are split for better analysis - Null values replaced with “Unknown” for clarity - Duration field broken into numeric + unit components

🔍 Dataset Purpose: Ideal for beginners and analysts who want to: - Practice data cleaning in Excel - Explore Netflix content trends - Analyze content by type, country, genre, or date added

📁 Original Dataset Credit: The base version was originally published by Shivam Bansal on Kaggle: https://www.kaggle.com/shivamb/netflix-shows

📌 Bonus: You can find a step-by-step cleaning guide and the same dataset on GitHub as well — along with screenshots and formulas documentation.

Ahoy, data enthusiasts! Join us for a hands-on workshop where you will hoist your sails and navigate through the Statistics Canada website, uncovering hidden treasures in the form of data tables. With the wind at your back, you’ll master the art of downloading these invaluable Stats Can datasets while braving the occasional squall of data cleaning challenges using Excel with your trusty captains Vivek and Lucia at the helm.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Shiva Vashishtha

Contents

Dataset

This dataset was created by Mohamed Khaled Idris

Contents

Abstract

The main objectives of the survey were: - To obtain weights for the revision of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Funafuti; - To provide information on the nature and distribution of household income, expenditure and food consumption patterns; - To provide data on the household sector's contribution to the National Accounts - To provide information on economic activity of men and women to study gender issues - To undertake some poverty analysis

Geographic coverage

National, including Funafuti and Outer islands

Analysis unit

• Household
• individual

Universe

All the private household are included in the sampling frame. In each household selected, the current resident are surveyed, and people who are usual resident but are currently away (work, health, holydays reasons, or border student for example. If the household had been residing in Tuvalu for less than one year: - but intend to reside more than 12 months => The household is included - do not intend to reside more than 12 months => out of scope

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

It was decided that 33% (one third) sample was sufficient to achieve suitable levels of accuracy for key estimates in the survey. So the sample selection was spread proportionally across all the island except Niulakita as it was considered too small. For selection purposes, each island was treated as a separate stratum and independent samples were selected from each. The strategy used was to list each dwelling on the island by their geographical position and run a systematic skip through the list to achieve the 33% sample. This approach assured that the sample would be spread out across each island as much as possible and thus more representative.

For details please refer to Table 1.1 of the Report.

Sampling deviation

Only the island of Niulakita was not included in the sampling frame, considered too small.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

There were three main survey forms used to collect data for the survey. Each question are writen in English and translated in Tuvaluan on the same version of the questionnaire. The questionnaires were designed based on the 2004 survey questionnaire.

HOUSEHOLD FORM - composition of the household and demographic profile of each members - dwelling information - dwelling expenditure - transport expenditure - education expenditure - health expenditure - land and property expenditure - household furnishing - home appliances - cultural and social payments - holydays/travel costs - Loans and saving - clothing - other major expenditure items

INDIVIDUAL FORM - health and education - labor force (individu aged 15 and above) - employment activity and income (individu aged 15 and above): wages and salaries, working own business, agriculture and livestock, fishing, income from handicraft, income from gambling, small scale activies, jobs in the last 12 months, other income, childreen income, tobacco and alcohol use, other activities, and seafarer

DIARY (one diary per week, on a 2 weeks period, 2 diaries per household were required) - All kind of expenses - Home production - food and drink (eaten by the household, given away, sold) - Goods taken from own business (consumed, given away) - Monetary gift (given away, received, winning from gambling) - Non monetary gift (given away, received, winning from gambling)

Questionnaire Design Flaws Questionnaire design flaws address any problems with the way questions were worded which will result in an incorrect answer provided by the respondent. Despite every effort to minimize this problem during the design of the respective survey questionnaires and the diaries, problems were still identified during the analysis of the data. Some examples are provided below:

Gifts, Remittances & Donations Collecting information on the following: - the receipt and provision of gifts - the receipt and provision of remittances - the provision of donations to the church, other communities and family occasions is a very difficult task in a HIES. The extent of these activities in Tuvalu is very high, so every effort should be made to address these activities as best as possible. A key problem lies in identifying the best form (questionnaire or diary) for covering such activities. A general rule of thumb for a HIES is that if the activity occurs on a regular basis, and involves the exchange of small monetary amounts or in-kind gifts, the diary is more appropriate. On the other hand, if the activity is less infrequent, and involves larger sums of money, the questionnaire with a recall approach is preferred. It is not always easy to distinguish between the two for the different activities, and as such, both the diary and questionnaire were used to collect this information. Unfortunately it probably wasn?t made clear enough as to what types of transactions were being collected from the different sources, and as such some transactions might have been missed, and others counted twice. The effects of these problems are hopefully minimal overall.

Defining Remittances Because people have different interpretations of what constitutes remittances, the questionnaire needs to be very clear as to how this concept is defined in the survey. Unfortunately this wasn?t explained clearly enough so it was difficult to distinguish between a remittance, which should be of a more regular nature, and a one-off monetary gift which was transferred between two households.

Business Expenses Still Recorded The aim of the survey is to measure "household" expenditure, and as such, any expenditure made by a household for an item or service which was primarily used for a business activity should be excluded. It was not always clear in the questionnaire that this was the case, and as such some business expenses were included. Efforts were made during data cleaning to remove any such business expenses which would impact significantly on survey results.

Purchased goods given away as a gift When a household makes a gift donation of an item it has purchased, this is recorded in section 5 of the diary. Unfortunately it was difficult to know how to treat these items as it was not clear as to whether this item had been recorded already in section 1 of the diary which covers purchases. The decision was made to exclude all information of gifts given which were considered to be purchases, as these items were assumed to have already been recorded already in section 1. Ideally these items should be treated as a purchased gift given away, which in turn is not household consumption expenditure, but this was not possible.

Some key items missed in the Questionnaire Although not a big issue, some key expenditure items were omitted from the questionnaire when it would have been best to collect them via this schedule. A key example being electric fans which many households in Tuvalu own.

Cleaning operations

Consistency of the data: - each questionnaire was checked by the supervisor during and after the collection - before data entry, all the questionnaire were coded - the CSPRo data entry system included inconsistency checks which allow the NSO staff to point some errors and to correct them with imputation estimation from their own knowledge (no time for double entry), 4 data entry operators. - after data entry, outliers were identified in order to check their consistency.

All data entry, including editing, edit checks and queries, was done using CSPro (Census Survey Processing System) with additional data editing and cleaning taking place in Excel.

The staff from the CSD was responsible for undertaking the coding and data entry, with assistance from an additional four temporary staff to help produce results in a more timely manner.

Although enumeration didn't get completed until mid June, the coding and data entry commenced as soon as forms where available from Funafuti, which was towards the end of March. The coding and data entry was then completed around the middle of July.

A visit from an SPC consultant then took place to undertake initial cleaning of the data, primarily addressing missing data items and missing schedules. Once the initial data cleaning was undertaken in CSPro, data was transferred to Excel where it was closely scrutinized to check that all responses were sensible. In the cases where unusual values were identified, original forms were consulted for these households and modifications made to the data if required.

Despite the best efforts being made to clean the data file in preparation for the analysis, no doubt errors will still exist in the data, due to its size and complexity. Having said this, they are not expected to have significant impacts on the survey results.

Under-Reporting and Incorrect Reporting as a result of Poor Field Work Procedures The most crucial stage of any survey activity, whether it be a population census or a survey such as a HIES is the fieldwork. It is crucial for intense checking to take place in the field before survey forms are returned to the office for data processing. Unfortunately, it became evident during the cleaning of the data that fieldwork wasn?t checked as thoroughly as required, and as such some unexpected values appeared in the questionnaires, as well as unusual results appearing in the diaries. Efforts were made to indentify the main issues which would have the greatest impact on final results, and this information was modified using local knowledge, to a more reasonable answer, when required.

Data Entry Errors Data entry errors are always expected, but can be kept to a minimum with

Netflix is a popular streaming service that offers a vast catalog of movies, TV shows, and original contents. This dataset is a cleaned version of the original version which can be found here. The data consist of contents added to Netflix from 2008 to 2021. The oldest content is as old as 1925 and the newest as 2021. This dataset will be cleaned with PostgreSQL and visualized with Tableau. The purpose of this dataset is to test my data cleaning and visualization skills. The cleaned data can be found below and the Tableau dashboard can be found here .

Data Cleaning

We are going to: 1. Treat the Nulls 2. Treat the duplicates 3. Populate missing rows 4. Drop unneeded columns 5. Split columns Extra steps and more explanation on the process will be explained through the code comments

--View dataset

SELECT * 
FROM netflix;

--The show_id column is the unique id for the dataset, therefore we are going to check for duplicates
                                  
SELECT show_id, COUNT(*)                                                                                      
FROM netflix 
GROUP BY show_id                                                                                              
ORDER BY show_id DESC;

--No duplicates

--Check null values across columns

SELECT COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE show_id IS NULL) AS showid_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE type IS NULL) AS type_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE title IS NULL) AS title_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE director IS NULL) AS director_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE movie_cast IS NULL) AS movie_cast_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE country IS NULL) AS country_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE date_added IS NULL) AS date_addes_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE release_year IS NULL) AS release_year_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE rating IS NULL) AS rating_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE duration IS NULL) AS duration_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE listed_in IS NULL) AS listed_in_nulls,
    COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE description IS NULL) AS description_nulls
FROM netflix;

We can see that there are NULLS. 
director_nulls = 2634
movie_cast_nulls = 825
country_nulls = 831
date_added_nulls = 10
rating_nulls = 4
duration_nulls = 3 

The director column nulls is about 30% of the whole column, therefore I will not delete them. I will rather find another column to populate it. To populate the director column, we want to find out if there is relationship between movie_cast column and director column

-- Below, we find out if some directors are likely to work with particular cast

WITH cte AS
(
SELECT title, CONCAT(director, '---', movie_cast) AS director_cast 
FROM netflix
)

SELECT director_cast, COUNT(*) AS count
FROM cte
GROUP BY director_cast
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC;

With this, we can now populate NULL rows in directors 
using their record with movie_cast 

UPDATE netflix 
SET director = 'Alastair Fothergill'
WHERE movie_cast = 'David Attenborough'
AND director IS NULL ;

--Repeat this step to populate the rest of the director nulls
--Populate the rest of the NULL in director as "Not Given"

UPDATE netflix 
SET director = 'Not Given'
WHERE director IS NULL;

--When I was doing this, I found a less complex and faster way to populate a column which I will use next

Just like the director column, I will not delete the nulls in country. Since the country column is related to director and movie, we are going to populate the country column with the director column

--Populate the country using the director column

SELECT COALESCE(nt.country,nt2.country) 
FROM netflix AS nt
JOIN netflix AS nt2 
ON nt.director = nt2.director 
AND nt.show_id <> nt2.show_id
WHERE nt.country IS NULL;
UPDATE netflix
SET country = nt2.country
FROM netflix AS nt2
WHERE netflix.director = nt2.director and netflix.show_id <> nt2.show_id 
AND netflix.country IS NULL;


--To confirm if there are still directors linked to country that refuse to update

SELECT director, country, date_added
FROM netflix
WHERE country IS NULL;

--Populate the rest of the NULL in director as "Not Given"

UPDATE netflix 
SET country = 'Not Given'
WHERE country IS NULL;

The date_added rows nulls is just 10 out of over 8000 rows, deleting them cannot affect our analysis or visualization

--Show date_added nulls

SELECT show_id, date_added
FROM netflix_clean
WHERE date_added IS NULL;

--DELETE nulls

DELETE F...

Dirty Retail Store Sales Dataset

Overview

The Dirty Retail Store Sales dataset contains 12,575 rows of synthetic data representing sales transactions from a retail store. The dataset includes eight product categories with 25 items per category, each having static prices. It is designed to simulate real-world sales data, including intentional "dirtiness" such as missing or inconsistent values. This dataset is suitable for practicing data cleaning, exploratory data analysis (EDA), and feature engineering.

File Information

• File Name: retail_store_sales.csv
• Number of Rows: 12,575
• Number of Columns: 11

Columns Description

Column Name	Description	Example Values
Transaction ID	A unique identifier for each transaction. Always present and unique.	TXN_1234567
Customer ID	A unique identifier for each customer. 25 unique customers.	CUST_01
Category	The category of the purchased item.	Food, Furniture
Item	The name of the purchased item. May contain missing values or None.	Item_1_FOOD, None
Price Per Unit	The static price of a single unit of the item. May contain missing or None values.	4.00, None
Quantity	The quantity of the item purchased. May contain missing or None values.	1, None
Total Spent	The total amount spent on the transaction. Calculated as Quantity * Price Per Unit.	8.00, None
Payment Method	The method of payment used. May contain missing or invalid values.	Cash, Credit Card
Location	The location where the transaction occurred. May contain missing or invalid values.	In-store, Online
Transaction Date	The date of the transaction. Always present and valid.	2023-01-15
Discount Applied	Indicates if a discount was applied to the transaction. May contain missing values.	True, False, None

Categories and Items

The dataset includes the following categories, each containing 25 items with corresponding codes, names, and static prices:

Electric Household Essentials

Item Code	Item Name	Price
Item_1_EHE	Blender	5.0
Item_2_EHE	Microwave	6.5
Item_3_EHE	Toaster	8.0
Item_4_EHE	Vacuum Cleaner	9.5
Item_5_EHE	Air Purifier	11.0
Item_6_EHE	Electric Kettle	12.5
Item_7_EHE	Rice Cooker	14.0
Item_8_EHE	Iron	15.5
Item_9_EHE	Ceiling Fan	17.0
Item_10_EHE	Table Fan	18.5
Item_11_EHE	Hair Dryer	20.0
Item_12_EHE	Heater	21.5
Item_13_EHE	Humidifier	23.0
Item_14_EHE	Dehumidifier	24.5
Item_15_EHE	Coffee Maker	26.0
Item_16_EHE	Portable AC	27.5
Item_17_EHE	Electric Stove	29.0
Item_18_EHE	Pressure Cooker	30.5
Item_19_EHE	Induction Cooktop	32.0
Item_20_EHE	Water Dispenser	33.5
Item_21_EHE	Hand Blender	35.0
Item_22_EHE	Mixer Grinder	36.5
Item_23_EHE	Sandwich Maker	38.0
Item_24_EHE	Air Fryer	39.5
Item_25_EHE	Juicer	41.0

Furniture

Item Code	Item Name	Price
Item_1_FUR	Office Chair	5.0
Item_2_FUR	Sofa	6.5
Item_3_FUR	Coffee Table	8.0
Item_4_FUR	Dining Table	9.5
Item_5_FUR	Bookshelf	11.0
Item_6_FUR	Bed F...

Types of data processing Claude's Code Interpreter can handle

27 Global import shipment records of Clean Excel with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

Managing, cleaning, and analyzing HR data efficiently. Offers flexible, accessible data handling for quick HR analysis.

123 Global export shipment records of Clean Excel with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

955 Global import shipment records of Clean,excel with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Luis Lira

Contents

8 Active Global Clean Excel buyers list and Global Clean Excel importers directory compiled from actual Global import shipments of Clean Excel.

4572 Global exporters importers export import shipment records of Clean excel with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

Abstract

The General Household Survey-Panel (GHS-Panel) is implemented in collaboration with the World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) team as part of the Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (ISA) program. The objectives of the GHS-Panel include the development of an innovative model for collecting agricultural data, interinstitutional collaboration, and comprehensive analysis of welfare indicators and socio-economic characteristics. The GHS-Panel is a nationally representative survey of approximately 5,000 households, which are also representative of the six geopolitical zones. The 2018/19 is the fourth round of the survey with prior rounds conducted in 2010/11, 2012/13, and 2015/16. GHS-Panel households were visited twice: first after the planting season (post-planting) between July and September 2018 and second after the harvest season (post-harvest) between January and February 2019.

Geographic coverage

National, the survey covered all the 36 states and Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

Analysis unit

Households, Individuals, Agricultural plots, Communites

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The original GHS-Panel sample of 5,000 households across 500 enumeration areas (EAs) and was designed to be representative at the national level as well as at the zonal level. The complete sampling information for the GHS-Panel is described in the Basic Information Document for GHS-Panel 2010/2011. However, after a nearly a decade of visiting the same households, a partial refresh of the GHS-Panel sample was implemented in Wave 4. For the partial refresh of the sample, a new set of 360 EAs were randomly selected which consisted of 60 EAs per zone. The refresh EAs were selected from the same sampling frame as the original GHS-Panel sample in 2010 (the "master frame").

A listing of all households was conducted in the 360 EAs and 10 households were randomly selected in each EA, resulting in a total refresh sample of approximated 3,600 households. In addition to these 3,600 refresh households, a subsample of the original 5,000 GHS-Panel households from 2010 were selected to be included in the new sample. This "long panel" sample was designed to be nationally representative to enable continued longitudinal analysis for the sample going back to 2010. The long panel sample consisted of 159 EAs systematically selected across the 6 geopolitical Zones. The systematic selection ensured that the distribution of EAs across the 6 Zones (and urban and rural areas within) is proportional to the original GHS-Panel sample.

Interviewers attempted to interview all households that originally resided in the 159 EAs and were successfully interviewed in the previous visit in 2016. This includes households that had moved away from their original location in 2010. In all, interviewers attempted to interview 1,507 households from the original panel sample. The combined sample of refresh and long panel EAs consisted of 519 EAs. The total number of households that were successfully interviewed in both visits was 4,976.

Sampling deviation

While the combined sample generally maintains both national and Zonal representativeness of the original GHS-Panel sample, the security situation in the North East of Nigeria prevented full coverage of the Zone. Due to security concerns, rural areas of Borno state were fully excluded from the refresh sample and some inaccessible urban areas were also excluded. Security concerns also prevented interviewers from visiting some communities in other parts of the country where conflict events were occurring. Refresh EAs that could not be accessed were replaced with another randomly selected EA in the Zone so as not to compromise the sample size. As a result, the combined sample is representative of areas of Nigeria that were accessible during 2018/19. The sample will not reflect conditions in areas that were undergoing conflict during that period. This compromise was necessary to ensure the safety of interviewers.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Cleaning operations

CAPI: For the first time in GHS-Panel, the Wave four exercise was conducted using Computer Assisted Person Interview (CAPI) techniques. All the questionnaires, household, agriculture and community questionnaires were implemented in both the post-planting and post-harvest visits of Wave 4 using the CAPI software, Survey Solutions. The Survey Solutions software was developed and maintained by the Survey Unit within the Development Economics Data Group (DECDG) at the World Bank. Each enumerator was given tablets which they used to conduct the interviews. Overall, implementation of survey using Survey Solutions CAPI was highly successful, as it allowed for timely availability of the data from completed interviews. DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEM: The data communication system used in Wave 4 was highly automated. Each field team was given a mobile modem allow for internet connectivity and daily synchronization of their tablet. This ensured that head office in Abuja has access to the data in real-time. Once the interview is completed and uploaded to the server, the data is first reviewed by the Data Editors.

The data is also downloaded from the server, and Stata dofile was run on the downloaded data to check for additional errors that were not captured by the Survey Solutions application. An excel error file is generated following the running of the Stata dofile on the raw dataset. Information contained in the excel error files are communicated back to respective field interviewers for action by the interviewers. This action is done on a daily basis throughout the duration of the survey, both in the post-planting and post-harvest. DATA CLEANING: The data cleaning process was done in three main stages. The first stage was to ensure proper quality control during the fieldwork. This was achieved in part by incorporating validation and consistency checks into the Survey Solutions application used for the data collection and designed to highlight many of the errors that occurred during the fieldwork. The second stage cleaning involved the use of Data Editors and Data Assistants (Headquarters in Survey Solutions). As indicated above, once the interview is completed and uploaded to the server, the Data Editors review completed interview for inconsistencies and extreme values. Depending on the outcome, they can either approve or reject the case. If rejected, the case goes back to the respective interviewer's tablet upon synchronization. Special care was taken to see that the households included in the data matched with the selected sample and where there were differences, these were properly assessed and documented.

The agriculture data were also checked to ensure that the plots identified in the main sections merged with the plot information identified in the other sections. Additional errors observed were compiled into error reports that were regularly sent to the teams. These errors were then corrected based on re-visits to the household on the instruction of the supervisor. The data that had gone through this first stage of cleaning was then approved by the Data Editor. After the Data Editor's approval of the interview on Survey Solutions server, the Headquarters also reviews and depending on the outcome, can either reject or approve. The third stage of cleaning involved a comprehensive review of the final raw data following the first and second stage cleaning. Every variable was examined individually for (1) consistency with other sections and variables, (2) out of range responses, and (3) outliers. However, special care was taken to avoid making strong assumptions when resolving potential errors. Some minor errors remain in the data where the diagnosis and/or solution were unclear to the data cleaning team.

We describe a bibliometric network characterizing co-authorship collaborations in the entire Italian academic community. The network, consisting of 38,220 nodes and 507,050 edges, is built upon two distinct data sources: faculty information provided by the Italian Ministry of University and Research and publications available in Semantic Scholar. Both nodes and edges are associated with a large variety of semantic data, including gender, bibliometric indexes, authors' and publications' research fields, and temporal information. While linking data between the two original sources posed many challenges, the network has been carefully validated to assess its reliability and to understand its graph-theoretic characteristics. By resembling several features of social networks, our dataset can be profitably leveraged in experimental studies in the wide social network analytics domain as well as in more specific bibliometric contexts. , The proposed network is built starting from two distinct data sources:

the entire dataset dump from Semantic Scholar (with particular emphasis on the authors and papers datasets) the entire list of Italian faculty members as maintained by Cineca (under appointment by the Italian Ministry of University and Research).

By means of a custom name-identity recognition algorithm (details are available in the accompanying paper published in Scientific Data), the names of the authors in the Semantic Scholar dataset have been mapped against the names contained in the Cineca dataset and authors with no match (e.g., because of not being part of an Italian university) have been discarded. The remaining authors will compose the nodes of the network, which have been enriched with node-related (i.e., author-related) attributes. In order to build the network edges, we leveraged the papers dataset from Semantic Scholar: specifically, any two authors are said to be connected if there is at least one pap..., , # Data cleaning and enrichment through data integration: networking the Italian academia

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wpzgmsbwj

Manuscript published in Scientific Data with DOI .

Description of the data and file structure

This repository contains two main data files:

• edge_data_AGG.csv, the full network in comma-separated edge list format (this file contains mainly temporal co-authorship information);
• Coauthorship_Network_AGG.graphml, the full network in GraphML format.Â

along with several supplementary data, listed below, useful only to build the network (i.e., for reproducibility only):

• University-City-match.xlsx, an Excel file that maps the name of a university against the city where its respective headquarter is located;
• Areas-SS-CINECA-match.xlsx, an Excel file that maps the research areas in Cineca against the research areas in Semantic Scholar.

Description of the main data files

The `Coauthorship_Networ...