Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
N.B. This is not real data. Only here for an example for project templates.
Project Title: Add title here
Project Team: Add contact information for research project team members
Summary: Provide a descriptive summary of the nature of your research project and its aims/focal research questions.
Relevant publications/outputs: When available, add links to the related publications/outputs from this data.
Data availability statement: If your data is not linked on figshare directly, provide links to where it is being hosted here (i.e., Open Science Framework, Github, etc.). If your data is not going to be made publicly available, please provide details here as to the conditions under which interested individuals could gain access to the data and how to go about doing so.
Data collection details: 1. When was your data collected? 2. How were your participants sampled/recruited?
Sample information: How many and who are your participants? Demographic summaries are helpful additions to this section.
Research Project Materials: What materials are necessary to fully reproduce your the contents of your dataset? Include a list of all relevant materials (e.g., surveys, interview questions) with a brief description of what is included in each file that should be uploaded alongside your datasets.
List of relevant datafile(s): If your project produces data that cannot be contained in a single file, list the names of each of the files here with a brief description of what parts of your research project each file is related to.
Data codebook: What is in each column of your dataset? Provide variable names as they are encoded in your data files, verbatim question associated with each response, response options, details of any post-collection coding that has been done on the raw-response (and whether that's encoded in a separate column).
Examples available at: https://www.thearda.com/data-archive?fid=PEWMU17 https://www.thearda.com/data-archive?fid=RELLAND14
Facebook
TwitterDataset Card for example-dataset
This dataset has been created with distilabel.
Dataset Summary
This dataset contains a pipeline.yaml which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the distilabel CLI: distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/rajkstats/example-dataset/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
or explore the configuration: distilabel pipeline info --config… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/rajkstats/example-dataset.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Describe your research hypothesis, what your data shows, any notable findings and how the data can be interpreted. Please add sufficient description to enable others to understand what the data is, how it was gathered and how to interpret and use it.
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Here is a description, how the datasets for a training notebook used for Telegram ML Contest solution were prepared.
The first part of the code samples was taken from a private version of this notebook.
Here is the statistics about classes of programming languages from Github Code Snippets database
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F833757%2F2fdc091661198e80559f8cb1d1a306ff%2FScreenshot%202023-11-07%20at%2021.24.42.png?generation=1699390166413391&alt=media" alt="">
From this database, 2 csv files were created - with 50000 code samples for each of the 20 programming languages included, with equal by numbers and stratified sampling. The files related here are sample_equal_prop_50000.csv and sample_equal_prop_50000.csv and sample_stratified_50000.csv, respectively.
Second option for capturing out additional examples was to run this notebook with making up larger amount of queries, 10000.
The resulted file is dataset-10000.csv - included to the data card
The statistics for the code programming languages is as on the next chart - it has 32 labeled classes
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F833757%2F7c04342da8ec1df266cd90daf00204f9%2FScreenshot%202023-10-13%20at%2020.52.13.png?generation=1699392769199533&alt=media" alt="">
To get a model more robust, code samples of 20 additional languages were collected in amount from 10 till 15 samples on more-less popular use cases. Also, for the class "OTHER", like regular language examples, according to the task of the competition, the text examples from this dataset with promts on Huggingface were added to the file. The resulted file here is rare_languages.csv - also in data card
The statistics for rare languages code snippets is as follows:
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F833757%2F0b340781c774d2acb988ce1567f4afa3%2FScreenshot%202023-11-08%20at%2001.13.07.png?generation=1699402436798661&alt=media" alt="">
For this stage of dataset creation, the number of the columns in sample_equal_prop_50000.csv and sample_stratified_50000.csv was cut out just for 2 - "snippet", "language", the version of file with equal numbers is in the data card - sample_equal_prop_50000_clean.csv
To prepare Bigquery dataset file, the column with index was cut out, and the column "content" was renamed to "snippet". These changes were saved in dataset-10000-clean.csv
After that, the files sample_equal_prop_50000_clean.csv and dataset-10000-clean.csv were combined together and saved as github-combined-file.csv
The prepared files took too much RAM to be read by Pandas library, so that is why additional prepocessing has been made - the symbols like quatas, commas, ampersands, new lines and adding tabs characters were cleaned out. After clieaning, the flies were merged with rare_languages.csv file and saved as github-combined-file-no-symbols-rare-clean.csv and sample_equal_prop_50000_-no-symbols-rare-clean.csv, respectively.
The final distribution of classes turned out to be the next one
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F833757%2Ff43e0cea4c565c9f7c808527b0dfa2da%2FScreenshot%202023-11-09%20at%2020.26.30.png?generation=1699558064765454&alt=media" alt="">
To be suitable for TF-DF format, to each programming language a certain label was given as well. The final labels are in the data card.
Facebook
TwitterAutomatically describing images using natural sentences is an essential task to visually impaired people's inclusion on the Internet. Although there are many datasets in the literature, most of them contain only English captions, whereas datasets with captions described in other languages are scarce.
PraCegoVer arose on the Internet, stimulating users from social media to publish images, tag #PraCegoVer and add a short description of their content. Inspired by this movement, we have proposed the #PraCegoVer, a multi-modal dataset with Portuguese captions based on posts from Instagram. It is the first large dataset for image captioning in Portuguese with freely annotated images.
Dataset Structure
containing the images. The file dataset.json comprehends a list of json objects with the attributes:
user: anonymized user that made the post;
filename: image file name;
raw_caption: raw caption;
caption: clean caption;
date: post date.
Each instance in dataset.json is associated with exactly one image in the images directory whose filename is pointed by the attribute filename. Also, we provide a sample with five instances, so the users can download the sample to get an overview of the dataset before downloading it completely.
Download Instructions
If you just want to have an overview of the dataset structure, you can download sample.tar.gz. But, if you want to use the dataset, or any of its subsets (63k and 173k), you must download all the files and run the following commands to uncompress and join the files:
cat images.tar.gz.part* > images.tar.gz tar -xzvf images.tar.gz
Alternatively, you can download the entire dataset from the terminal using the python script download_dataset.py available in PraCegoVer repository. In this case, first, you have to download the script and create an access token here. Then, you can run the following command to download and uncompress the image files:
python download_dataset.py --access_token=
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The complete dataset used in the analysis comprises 36 samples, each described by 11 numeric features and 1 target. The attributes considered were caspase 3/7 activity, Mitotracker red CMXRos area and intensity (3 h and 24 h incubations with both compounds), Mitosox oxidation (3 h incubation with the referred compounds) and oxidation rate, DCFDA fluorescence (3 h and 24 h incubations with either compound) and oxidation rate, and DQ BSA hydrolysis. The target of each instance corresponds to one of the 9 possible classes (4 samples per class): Control, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µM for 6-OHDA and 0.03, 0.06, 0.125 and 0.25 µM for rotenone. The dataset is balanced, it does not contain any missing values and data was standardized across features. The small number of samples prevented a full and strong statistical analysis of the results. Nevertheless, it allowed the identification of relevant hidden patterns and trends.
Exploratory data analysis, information gain, hierarchical clustering, and supervised predictive modeling were performed using Orange Data Mining version 3.25.1 [41]. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the Euclidean distance metric and weighted linkage. Cluster maps were plotted to relate the features with higher mutual information (in rows) with instances (in columns), with the color of each cell representing the normalized level of a particular feature in a specific instance. The information is grouped both in rows and in columns by a two-way hierarchical clustering method using the Euclidean distances and average linkage. Stratified cross-validation was used to train the supervised decision tree. A set of preliminary empirical experiments were performed to choose the best parameters for each algorithm, and we verified that, within moderate variations, there were no significant changes in the outcome. The following settings were adopted for the decision tree algorithm: minimum number of samples in leaves: 2; minimum number of samples required to split an internal node: 5; stop splitting when majority reaches: 95%; criterion: gain ratio. The performance of the supervised model was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure and area under the ROC curve (AUC) metrics.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A collection of 22 data set of 50+ requirements each, expressed as user stories.
The dataset has been created by gathering data from web sources and we are not aware of license agreements or intellectual property rights on the requirements / user stories. The curator took utmost diligence in minimizing the risks of copyright infringement by using non-recent data that is less likely to be critical, by sampling a subset of the original requirements collection, and by qualitatively analyzing the requirements. In case of copyright infringement, please contact the dataset curator (Fabiano Dalpiaz, f.dalpiaz@uu.nl) to discuss the possibility of removal of that dataset [see Zenodo's policies]
The data sets have been originally used to conduct experiments about ambiguity detection with the REVV-Light tool: https://github.com/RELabUU/revv-light
This collection has been originally published in Mendeley data: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/7zbk8zsd8y/1
The following text provides a description of the datasets, including links to the systems and websites, when available. The datasets are organized by macro-category and then by identifier.
g02-federalspending.txt (2018) originates from early data in the Federal Spending Transparency project, which pertain to the website that is used to share publicly the spending data for the U.S. government. The website was created because of the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014 (DATA Act). The specific dataset pertains a system called DAIMS or Data Broker, which stands for DATA Act Information Model Schema. The sample that was gathered refers to a sub-project related to allowing the government to act as a data broker, thereby providing data to third parties. The data for the Data Broker project is currently not available online, although the backend seems to be hosted in GitHub under a CC0 1.0 Universal license. Current and recent snapshots of federal spending related websites, including many more projects than the one described in the shared collection, can be found here.
g03-loudoun.txt (2018) is a set of extracted requirements from a document, by the Loudoun County Virginia, that describes the to-be user stories and use cases about a system for land management readiness assessment called Loudoun County LandMARC. The source document can be found here and it is part of the Electronic Land Management System and EPlan Review Project - RFP RFQ issued in March 2018. More information about the overall LandMARC system and services can be found here.
g04-recycling.txt(2017) concerns a web application where recycling and waste disposal facilities can be searched and located. The application operates through the visualization of a map that the user can interact with. The dataset has obtained from a GitHub website and it is at the basis of a students' project on web site design; the code is available (no license).
g05-openspending.txt (2018) is about the OpenSpending project (www), a project of the Open Knowledge foundation which aims at transparency about how local governments spend money. At the time of the collection, the data was retrieved from a Trello board that is currently unavailable. The sample focuses on publishing, importing and editing datasets, and how the data should be presented. Currently, OpenSpending is managed via a GitHub repository which contains multiple sub-projects with unknown license.
g11-nsf.txt (2018) refers to a collection of user stories referring to the NSF Site Redesign & Content Discovery project, which originates from a publicly accessible GitHub repository (GPL 2.0 license). In particular, the user stories refer to an early version of the NSF's website. The user stories can be found as closed Issues.
g08-frictionless.txt (2016) regards the Frictionless Data project, which offers an open source dataset for building data infrastructures, to be used by researchers, data scientists, and data engineers. Links to the many projects within the Frictionless Data project are on GitHub (with a mix of Unlicense and MIT license) and web. The specific set of user stories has been collected in 2016 by GitHub user @danfowler and are stored in a Trello board.
g14-datahub.txt (2013) concerns the open source project DataHub, which is currently developed via a GitHub repository (the code has Apache License 2.0). DataHub is a data discovery platform which has been developed over multiple years. The specific data set is an initial set of user stories, which we can date back to 2013 thanks to a comment therein.
g16-mis.txt (2015) is a collection of user stories that pertains a repository for researchers and archivists. The source of the dataset is a public Trello repository. Although the user stories do not have explicit links to projects, it can be inferred that the stories originate from some project related to the library of Duke University.
g17-cask.txt (2016) refers to the Cask Data Application Platform (CDAP). CDAP is an open source application platform (GitHub, under Apache License 2.0) that can be used to develop applications within the Apache Hadoop ecosystem, an open-source framework which can be used for distributed processing of large datasets. The user stories are extracted from a document that includes requirements regarding dataset management for Cask 4.0, which includes the scenarios, user stories and a design for the implementation of these user stories. The raw data is available in the following environment.
g18-neurohub.txt (2012) is concerned with the NeuroHub platform, a neuroscience data management, analysis and collaboration platform for researchers in neuroscience to collect, store, and share data with colleagues or with the research community. The user stories were collected at a time NeuroHub was still a research project sponsored by the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). For information about the research project from which the requirements were collected, see the following record.
g22-rdadmp.txt (2018) is a collection of user stories from the Research Data Alliance's working group on DMP Common Standards. Their GitHub repository contains a collection of user stories that were created by asking the community to suggest functionality that should part of a website that manages data management plans. Each user story is stored as an issue on the GitHub's page.
g23-archivesspace.txt (2012-2013) refers to ArchivesSpace: an open source, web application for managing archives information. The application is designed to support core functions in archives administration such as accessioning; description and arrangement of processed materials including analog, hybrid, and
born digital content; management of authorities and rights; and reference service. The application supports collection management through collection management records, tracking of events, and a growing number of administrative reports. ArchivesSpace is open source and its
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is an enriched version of the Code4ML dataset, a large-scale corpus of annotated Python code snippets, competition summaries, and data descriptions sourced from Kaggle. The initial release includes approximately 2.5 million snippets of machine learning code extracted from around 100,000 Jupyter notebooks. A portion of these snippets has been manually annotated by human assessors through a custom-built, user-friendly interface designed for this task.
The original dataset is organized into multiple CSV files, each containing structured data on different entities:
Table 1. code_blocks.csv structure
| Column | Description |
| code_blocks_index | Global index linking code blocks to markup_data.csv. |
| kernel_id | Identifier for the Kaggle Jupyter notebook from which the code block was extracted. |
| code_block_id |
Position of the code block within the notebook. |
| code_block |
The actual machine learning code snippet. |
Table 2. kernels_meta.csv structure
| Column | Description |
| kernel_id | Identifier for the Kaggle Jupyter notebook. |
| kaggle_score | Performance metric of the notebook. |
| kaggle_comments | Number of comments on the notebook. |
| kaggle_upvotes | Number of upvotes the notebook received. |
| kernel_link | URL to the notebook. |
| comp_name | Name of the associated Kaggle competition. |
Table 3. competitions_meta.csv structure
| Column | Description |
| comp_name | Name of the Kaggle competition. |
| description | Overview of the competition task. |
| data_type | Type of data used in the competition. |
| comp_type | Classification of the competition. |
| subtitle | Short description of the task. |
| EvaluationAlgorithmAbbreviation | Metric used for assessing competition submissions. |
| data_sources | Links to datasets used. |
| metric type | Class label for the assessment metric. |
Table 4. markup_data.csv structure
| Column | Description |
| code_block | Machine learning code block. |
| too_long | Flag indicating whether the block spans multiple semantic types. |
| marks | Confidence level of the annotation. |
| graph_vertex_id | ID of the semantic type. |
The dataset allows mapping between these tables. For example:
kernel_id column.comp_name. To maintain quality, kernels_meta.csv includes only notebooks with available Kaggle scores.In addition, data_with_preds.csv contains automatically classified code blocks, with a mapping back to code_blocks.csvvia the code_blocks_index column.
The updated Code4ML 2.0 corpus introduces kernels extracted from Meta Kaggle Code. These kernels correspond to the kaggle competitions launched since 2020. The natural descriptions of the competitions are retrieved with the aim of LLM.
Notebooks in kernels_meta2.csv may not have a Kaggle score but include a leaderboard ranking (rank), providing additional context for evaluation.
competitions_meta_2.csv is enriched with data_cards, decsribing the data used in the competitions.
The Code4ML 2.0 corpus is a versatile resource, enabling training and evaluation of models in areas such as:
Facebook
TwitterData-driven models help mobile app designers understand best practices and trends, and can be used to make predictions about design performance and support the creation of adaptive UIs. This paper presents Rico, the largest repository of mobile app designs to date, created to support five classes of data-driven applications: design search, UI layout generation, UI code generation, user interaction modeling, and user perception prediction. To create Rico, we built a system that combines crowdsourcing and automation to scalably mine design and interaction data from Android apps at runtime. The Rico dataset contains design data from more than 9.3k Android apps spanning 27 categories. It exposes visual, textual, structural, and interactive design properties of more than 66k unique UI screens. To demonstrate the kinds of applications that Rico enables, we present results from training an autoencoder for UI layout similarity, which supports query-by-example search over UIs.
Rico was built by mining Android apps at runtime via human-powered and programmatic exploration. Like its predecessor ERICA, Rico’s app mining infrastructure requires no access to — or modification of — an app’s source code. Apps are downloaded from the Google Play Store and served to crowd workers through a web interface. When crowd workers use an app, the system records a user interaction trace that captures the UIs visited and the interactions performed on them. Then, an automated agent replays the trace to warm up a new copy of the app and continues the exploration programmatically, leveraging a content-agnostic similarity heuristic to efficiently discover new UI states. By combining crowdsourcing and automation, Rico can achieve higher coverage over an app’s UI states than either crawling strategy alone. In total, 13 workers recruited on UpWork spent 2,450 hours using apps on the platform over five months, producing 10,811 user interaction traces. After collecting a user trace for an app, we ran the automated crawler on the app for one hour.
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN https://interactionmining.org/rico
The Rico dataset is large enough to support deep learning applications. We trained an autoencoder to learn an embedding for UI layouts, and used it to annotate each UI with a 64-dimensional vector representation encoding visual layout. This vector representation can be used to compute structurally — and often semantically — similar UIs, supporting example-based search over the dataset. To create training inputs for the autoencoder that embed layout information, we constructed a new image for each UI capturing the bounding box regions of all leaf elements in its view hierarchy, differentiating between text and non-text elements. Rico’s view hierarchies obviate the need for noisy image processing or OCR techniques to create these inputs.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset is comprised of a collection of example DMPs from a wide array of fields; obtained from a number of different sources outlined below. Data included/extracted from the examples include the discipline and field of study, author, institutional affiliation and funding information, location, date created, title, research and data-type, description of project, link to the DMP, and where possible external links to related publications or grant pages. This CSV document serves as the content for a McMaster Data Management Plan (DMP) Database as part of the Research Data Management (RDM) Services website, located at https://u.mcmaster.ca/dmps. Other universities and organizations are encouraged to link to the DMP Database or use this dataset as the content for their own DMP Database. This dataset will be updated regularly to include new additions and will be versioned as such. We are gathering submissions at https://u.mcmaster.ca/submit-a-dmp to continue to expand the collection.
Facebook
TwitterLikes and image data from the community art website Behance. This is a small, anonymized, version of a larger proprietary dataset.
Metadata includes
appreciates (likes)
timestamps
extracted image features
Basic Statistics:
Users: 63,497
Items: 178,788
Appreciates (likes): 1,000,000
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Sample home depot dataset included more than 3500+ records Total Fields: 13 Format: CSV Fields: url, title, images, description, product_id, sku, gtin13, brand, price, currency, availability, uniq_id, scraped_at
Crawl Feeds team extracted data from the home depot. Download complete dataset with more than 1 million+ products in csv format
The Home depot dataset useful for research and analysis purposes
Facebook
TwitterThe previous review in this series introduced the notion of data description and outlined some of the more common summary measures used to describe a dataset. However, a dataset is typically only of interest for the information it provides regarding the population from which it was drawn. The present review focuses on estimation of population values from a sample.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This paper explores a unique dataset of all the SET ratings provided by students of one university in Poland at the end of the winter semester of the 2020/2021 academic year. The SET questionnaire used by this university is presented in Appendix 1. The dataset is unique for several reasons. It covers all SET surveys filled by students in all fields and levels of study offered by the university. In the period analysed, the university was entirely in the online regime amid the Covid-19 pandemic. While the expected learning outcomes formally have not been changed, the online mode of study could have affected the grading policy and could have implications for some of the studied SET biases. This Covid-19 effect is captured by econometric models and discussed in the paper. The average SET scores were matched with the characteristics of the teacher for degree, seniority, gender, and SET scores in the past six semesters; the course characteristics for time of day, day of the week, course type, course breadth, class duration, and class size; the attributes of the SET survey responses as the percentage of students providing SET feedback; and the grades of the course for the mean, standard deviation, and percentage failed. Data on course grades are also available for the previous six semesters. This rich dataset allows many of the biases reported in the literature to be tested for and new hypotheses to be formulated, as presented in the introduction section. The unit of observation or the single row in the data set is identified by three parameters: teacher unique id (j), course unique id (k) and the question number in the SET questionnaire (n ϵ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9} ). It means that for each pair (j,k), we have nine rows, one for each SET survey question, or sometimes less when students did not answer one of the SET questions at all. For example, the dependent variable SET_score_avg(j,k,n) for the triplet (j=Calculus, k=John Smith, n=2) is calculated as the average of all Likert-scale answers to question nr 2 in the SET survey distributed to all students that took the Calculus course taught by John Smith. The data set has 8,015 such observations or rows. The full list of variables or columns in the data set included in the analysis is presented in the attached filesection. Their description refers to the triplet (teacher id = j, course id = k, question number = n). When the last value of the triplet (n) is dropped, it means that the variable takes the same values for all n ϵ {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}.Two attachments:- word file with variables description- Rdata file with the data set (for R language).Appendix 1. Appendix 1. The SET questionnaire was used for this paper. Evaluation survey of the teaching staff of [university name] Please, complete the following evaluation form, which aims to assess the lecturer’s performance. Only one answer should be indicated for each question. The answers are coded in the following way: 5- I strongly agree; 4- I agree; 3- Neutral; 2- I don’t agree; 1- I strongly don’t agree. Questions 1 2 3 4 5 I learnt a lot during the course. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ I think that the knowledge acquired during the course is very useful. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The professor used activities to make the class more engaging. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ If it was possible, I would enroll for the course conducted by this lecturer again. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The classes started on time. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer always used time efficiently. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer delivered the class content in an understandable and efficient way. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer was available when we had doubts. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ The lecturer treated all students equally regardless of their race, background and ethnicity. ○ ○
Facebook
TwitterDataset Card for Dataset Name
This dataset card aims to be a base template for new datasets. It has been generated using this raw template.
Dataset Details
Dataset Description
Curated by: [More Information Needed] Funded by [optional]: [More Information Needed] Shared by [optional]: [More Information Needed] Language(s) (NLP): [More Information Needed] License: [More Information Needed]
Dataset Sources [optional]
Repository: [More… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/templates/dataset-card-example.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In this project, we work on repairing three datasets:
country_protocol_code, conduct the same clinical trials which is identified by eudract_number. Each clinical trial has a title that can help find informative details about the design of the trial.eudract_number. The ground truth samples in the dataset were established by aligning information about the trial populations provided by external registries, specifically the CT.gov database and the German Trials database. Additionally, the dataset comprises other unstructured attributes that categorize the inclusion criteria for trial participants such as inclusion.code. Samples with the same code represent the same product but are extracted from a differentb source. The allergens are indicated by (‘2’) if present, or (‘1’) if there are traces of it, and (‘0’) if it is absent in a product. The dataset also includes information on ingredients in the products. Overall, the dataset comprises categorical structured data describing the presence, trace, or absence of specific allergens, and unstructured text describing ingredients. N.B: Each '.zip' file contains a set of 5 '.csv' files which are part of the afro-mentioned datasets:
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
A dataset I generated to showcase a sample set of user data for a fictional streaming service. This data is great for practicing SQL, Excel, Tableau, or Power BI.
1000 rows and 25 columns of connected data.
See below for column descriptions.
Enjoy :)
Facebook
TwitterDescription: This dataset consists of field data (arthropods, nematodes and NDVI) collected over the course of 6 field excursions in 2015 and 2016 near TyTy, GA, in a field used for growing Miscanthus x giganteus. It also includes interpolated values of soil measurements collected in 2015 and meteorological data collected on an adjacent farm. Point-in-time measurements include all meteorological, NDVI, arthropod and nematode measurements and their derivatives. Fixed values were measurements that were held constant across all sampling dates, including location, terrain and soils measurements and their derivatives. Dawn Olson and Jason Schmidt collected and processed arthropod count data. Jason Schmidt collected and processed spider count data and computed spider diversity. Richard Davis collected and processed nematode count data. Alisa Coffin collected and processed NDVI data and positional locations. Tim Strickland collected and processed soils data and Alisa Coffin interpolated soils values using kriging to derive values at arthropod sample locations. David Bosch collected and processed meteorological data. Lynne Seymour provided statistical expertise in deriving any estimated values (phloem feeders, parasitoids, spiders, and natural enemies). Alisa Coffin derived terrain data (elevation, slope, aspect, and distances) from publicly available datasets, transformed values (SI, WI, etc), carried out the geographically weighted regression analysis and calculated C:SE values, harmonized the full dataset, and compiled it using Esri's ArcGIS Pro 2.5. Methods for most data are published in the accompanying paper and associated supplements. Questions about dataset development and management should be directed to Alisa Coffin (alisa.coffin@usda.gov). This work was accomplished as a joint USDA and University of Georgia project funded by a cooperative agreement (#6048-13000-026-21S). This research was a contribution from the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network. LTAR is supported by the United States Department of Agriculture. At request of the author, the data resources are under embargo. The embargo will expire on Fri, Jan 01, 2021. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Spreadsheet of data. File Name: GibbsMisFarm_Arthrop_Env_DepVar_201516_final.xlsxResource Description: This workbook contains all of the data used in this analysis. The first worksheet contains data dictionary information.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel, Office 365,url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/excel Resource Title: GeoJSON. File Name: MiscanthusXGiganteusGeoJSON.json
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
We include Stata syntax (dummy_dataset_create.do) that creates a panel dataset for negative binomial time series regression analyses, as described in our paper "Examining methodology to identify patterns of consulting in primary care for different groups of patients before a diagnosis of cancer: an exemplar applied to oesophagogastric cancer". We also include a sample dataset for clarity (dummy_dataset.dta), and a sample of that data in a spreadsheet (Appendix 2).
The variables contained therein are defined as follows:
case: binary variable for case or control status (takes a value of 0 for controls and 1 for cases).
patid: a unique patient identifier.
time_period: A count variable denoting the time period. In this example, 0 denotes 10 months before diagnosis with cancer, and 9 denotes the month of diagnosis with cancer,
ncons: number of consultations per month.
period0 to period9: 10 unique inflection point variables (one for each month before diagnosis). These are used to test which aggregation period includes the inflection point.
burden: binary variable denoting membership of one of two multimorbidity burden groups.
We also include two Stata do-files for analysing the consultation rate, stratified by burden group, using the Maximum likelihood method (1_menbregpaper.do and 2_menbregpaper_bs.do).
Note: In this example, for demonstration purposes we create a dataset for 10 months leading up to diagnosis. In the paper, we analyse 24 months before diagnosis. Here, we study consultation rates over time, but the method could be used to study any countable event, such as number of prescriptions.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This dataset shows whether each dataset on data.maryland.gov has been updated recently enough. For example, datasets containing weekly data should be updated at least every 7 days. Datasets containing monthly data should be updated at least every 31 days. This dataset also shows a compendium of metadata from all data.maryland.gov datasets.
This report was created by the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) on August 12 2015. New reports will be uploaded daily (this report is itself included in the report, so that users can see whether new reports are consistently being uploaded each week). Generation of this report uses the Socrata Open Data (API) to retrieve metadata on date of last data update and update frequency. Analysis and formatting of the metadata use Javascript, jQuery, and AJAX.
This report will be used during meetings of the Maryland Open Data Council to curate datasets for maintenance and make sure the Open Data Portal's data stays up to date.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
N.B. This is not real data. Only here for an example for project templates.
Project Title: Add title here
Project Team: Add contact information for research project team members
Summary: Provide a descriptive summary of the nature of your research project and its aims/focal research questions.
Relevant publications/outputs: When available, add links to the related publications/outputs from this data.
Data availability statement: If your data is not linked on figshare directly, provide links to where it is being hosted here (i.e., Open Science Framework, Github, etc.). If your data is not going to be made publicly available, please provide details here as to the conditions under which interested individuals could gain access to the data and how to go about doing so.
Data collection details: 1. When was your data collected? 2. How were your participants sampled/recruited?
Sample information: How many and who are your participants? Demographic summaries are helpful additions to this section.
Research Project Materials: What materials are necessary to fully reproduce your the contents of your dataset? Include a list of all relevant materials (e.g., surveys, interview questions) with a brief description of what is included in each file that should be uploaded alongside your datasets.
List of relevant datafile(s): If your project produces data that cannot be contained in a single file, list the names of each of the files here with a brief description of what parts of your research project each file is related to.
Data codebook: What is in each column of your dataset? Provide variable names as they are encoded in your data files, verbatim question associated with each response, response options, details of any post-collection coding that has been done on the raw-response (and whether that's encoded in a separate column).
Examples available at: https://www.thearda.com/data-archive?fid=PEWMU17 https://www.thearda.com/data-archive?fid=RELLAND14