Data organization for the figures in the document: Figure 3A LineOutWithSun_SSAzi_135to225_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 3b LineOutWithSun_SSAzi_m45to45_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 4 fulllinear_inDic_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls fulllinear_inDic_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Sim_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 5a LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_m180to0_green_Sim_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_m180to0_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 5b LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_0to180_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_0to180_green_Sim_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 6a LineOutColor_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls Figure 6b LineOutROI_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Correct_INFO.xls Figure 7 fulllinear_inDic_SqAzi_m180to0_CP_20to50_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_MeshAoPDif_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_0to180_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls LineOut_MeshAoPDif_Camera_Elevation_SqAzi_m180to0_green_Correct_ROI5_INFO.xls

Excel spreadsheets by species (4 letter code is abbreviation for genus and species used in study, year 2010 or 2011 is year data collected, SH indicates data for Science Hub, date is date of file preparation). The data in a file are described in a read me file which is the first worksheet in each file. Each row in a species spreadsheet is for one plot (plant). The data themselves are in the data worksheet. One file includes a read me description of the column in the date set for chemical analysis. In this file one row is an herbicide treatment and sample for chemical analysis (if taken). This dataset is associated with the following publication: Olszyk , D., T. Pfleeger, T. Shiroyama, M. Blakely-Smith, E. Lee , and M. Plocher. Plant reproduction is altered by simulated herbicide drift toconstructed plant communities. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, FL, USA, 36(10): 2799-2813, (2017).

Dataset

This dataset was created by Pinky Verma

Contents

Dataset

This dataset was created by Aziza Afrin

Contents

The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey. Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

Analytical and field sampling data for each 2018-2019 NRSA Fish Tissue Study chemical contaminant are provided, along with a data dictionary that describes the contents of each data file. All results for the fillet tissue concentrations are reported on a wet weight basis. All the fish fillet samples analyzed contained detectable levels of mercury and PCBs, and PFAS were detected in 95% of the fillet samples. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Stahl, L., B.D. Snyder, H.B. McCarty, T. Kincaid, A. Olsen, T.R. Cohen, and J. Healey. Contaminants in Fish from U.S. Rivers: Probability-Based National Assessments. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT. Elsevier BV, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 861(25): 160557, (2023).

DCR 2023 Supplemental Excel Files

Sample data for exercises in Further Adventures in Data Cleaning.

This is a dataset downloaded off excelbianalytics.com created off of random VBA logic. I recently performed an extensive exploratory data analysis on it and I included new columns to it, namely: Unit margin, Order year, Order month, Order weekday and Order_Ship_Days which I think can help with analysis on the data. I shared it because I thought it was a great dataset to practice analytical processes on for newbies like myself.

Abstract

The documentation covers Enterprise Survey panel datasets that were collected in Slovenia in 2009, 2013 and 2019.

The Slovenia ES 2009 was conducted between 2008 and 2009. The Slovenia ES 2013 was conducted between March 2013 and September 2013. Finally, the Slovenia ES 2019 was conducted between December 2018 and November 2019. The objective of the Enterprise Survey is to gain an understanding of what firms experience in the private sector.

As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must take its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

Universe

As it is standard for the ES, the Slovenia ES was based on the following size stratification: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample for Slovenia ES 2009, 2013, 2019 were selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Manual for Slovenia 2009 ES and for Slovenia 2013 ES, and in the Sampling Note for 2019 Slovenia ES.

Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and oblast (region). The original sample designs with specific information of the industries and regions chosen are included in the attached Excel file (Sampling Report.xls.) for Slovenia 2009 ES. For Slovenia 2013 and 2019 ES, specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in the "The Slovenia 2013 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" and "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" reports respectively, Appendix E.

For the Slovenia 2009 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into manufacturing industries, services industries, and one residual (core) sector as defined in the sampling manual. Each industry had a target of 90 interviews. For the manufacturing industries sample sizes were inflated by about 17% to account for potential non-response cases when requesting sensitive financial data and also because of likely attrition in future surveys that would affect the construction of a panel. For the other industries (residuals) sample sizes were inflated by about 12% to account for under sampling in firms in service industries.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into one manufacturing industry, and two service industries (retail, and other services).

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. The original sample design with specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" report, Appendix C. Industry stratification was done as follows: Manufacturing – combining all the relevant activities (ISIC Rev. 4.0 codes 10-33), Retail (ISIC 47), and Other Services (ISIC 41-43, 45, 46, 49-53, 55, 56, 58, 61, 62, 79, 95).

For Slovenia 2009 and 2013 ES, size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

For Slovenia 2009 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions. These regions are Vzhodna Slovenija and Zahodna Slovenija. The Slovenia sample contains panel data. The wave 1 panel “Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey implemented in Slovenia” consisted of 223 establishments interviewed in 2005. A total of 57 establishments have been re-interviewed in the 2008 Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Slovenia.

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, regional stratification was done across two regions: Eastern Slovenia (NUTS code SI03) and Western Slovenia (SI04).

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

Response rate

Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as (-8). b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary. However, there were clear cases of low response.

For 2009 and 2013 Slovenia ES, the survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Up to 4 attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals. Further research is needed on survey non-response in the Enterprise Surveys regarding potential introduction of bias.

For 2009, the number of contacted establishments per realized interview was 6.18. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The relatively low ratio of contacted establishments per realized interview (6.18) suggests that the main source of error in estimates in the Slovenia may be selection bias and not frame inaccuracy.

For 2013, the number of realized interviews per contacted establishment was 25%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 44%.

Finally, for 2019, the number of interviews per contacted establishments was 9.7%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The share of rejections per contact was 75.2%.

This is the Excel file for the PhD study of Jack Brimmell entitled: A longitudinal examination of executive function, visual attention, and soccer penalty performance.

The dataset includes customer id,Martial Status,Gender,Income,Children,Education,Occupation,Home Owner,Cars,Commute Distance,Region,Age,Purchased Bike. Blog

The Delta Neighborhood Physical Activity Study was an observational study designed to assess characteristics of neighborhood built environments associated with physical activity. It was an ancillary study to the Delta Healthy Sprouts Project and therefore included towns and neighborhoods in which Delta Healthy Sprouts participants resided. The 12 towns were located in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Data were collected via electronic surveys between August 2016 and September 2017 using the Rural Active Living Assessment (RALA) tools and the Community Park Audit Tool (CPAT). Scale scores for the RALA Programs and Policies Assessment and the Town-Wide Assessment were computed using the scoring algorithms provided for these tools via SAS software programming. The Street Segment Assessment and CPAT do not have associated scoring algorithms and therefore no scores are provided for them. Because the towns were not randomly selected and the sample size is small, the data may not be generalizable to all rural towns in the Lower Mississippi Delta region of Mississippi. Dataset one contains data collected with the RALA Programs and Policies Assessment (PPA) tool. Dataset two contains data collected with the RALA Town-Wide Assessment (TWA) tool. Dataset three contains data collected with the RALA Street Segment Assessment (SSA) tool. Dataset four contains data collected with the Community Park Audit Tool (CPAT). [Note : title changed 9/4/2020 to reflect study name] Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Dataset One RALA PPA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA PPA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset one collected using the RALA PPA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Two RALA TWA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA TWA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset two collected using the RALA TWA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Three RALA SSA Data Dictionary. File Name: RALA SSA Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset three collected using the RALA SSA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Four CPAT Data Dictionary. File Name: CPAT Data Dictionary.csvResource Description: Data dictionary for dataset four collected using the CPAT.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset One RALA PPA. File Name: RALA PPA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA PPA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Two RALA TWA. File Name: RALA TWA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA TWA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Three RALA SSA. File Name: RALA SSA Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the RALA SSA tool.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Dataset Four CPAT. File Name: CPAT Data.csvResource Description: Data collected using the CPAT.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel Resource Title: Data Dictionary. File Name: DataDictionary_RALA_PPA_SSA_TWA_CPAT.csvResource Description: This is a combined data dictionary from each of the 4 dataset files in this set.

It contains all the necessary data to replicate the statistical and regression results presented in this paper. (XLSX)

Dataset

This dataset was created by Rohit Bansal

Contents

In here all csv files and excel sheets used for statistical analyses are stored.The Excel file 'Raw data' contains a description of each varable in the tab 'metadata'.The second tab contains all the obtained raw data.

Adventure Works 2022 dataset

How this Dataset is created?

On the official website the dataset is available over SQL server (localhost) and CSVs to be used via Power BI Desktop running on Virtual Lab (Virtaul Machine). As per first two steps of Importing data are executed in the virtual lab and then resultant Power BI tables are copied in CSVs. Added records till year 2022 as required.

How this Dataset may help you?

this dataset will be helpful in case you want to work offline with Adventure Works data in Power BI desktop in order to carry lab instructions as per training material on official website. The dataset is useful in case you want to work on Power BI desktop Sales Analysis example from Microsoft website PL 300 learning.

How to use this Dataset?

Download the CSV file(s) and import in Power BI desktop as tables. The CSVs are named as tables created after first two steps of importing data as mentioned in the PL-300 Microsoft Power BI Data Analyst exam lab.

Raw source data file with individual-level data in a single Excel file for each figure panel in a separate tab.

The datasets in this zip file are in support of Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) report FHWA-JPO-16-385, "Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (AMS) Testbed Development and Evaluation to Support Dynamic Mobility Applications (DMA) and Active Transportation and Demand Management (ATDM) Programs — Evaluation Report for ATDM Program," https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32520 and FHWA-JPO-16-373, "Analysis, modeling, and simulation (AMS) testbed development and evaluation to support dynamic mobility applications (DMA) and active transportation and demand management (ATDM) programs : Dallas testbed analysis plan," https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32106 The files in this zip file are specifically related to the Dallas Testbed. The compressed zip files total 2.2 GB in size. The files have been uploaded as-is; no further documentation was supplied by NTL. All located .docx files were converted to .pdf document files which are an open, archival format. These pdfs were then added to the zip file alongside the original .docx files. These files can be unzipped using any zip compression/decompression software. This zip file contains files in the following formats: .pdf document files which can be read using any pdf reader; .cvs text files which can be read using any text editor; .txt text files which can be read using any text editor; .docx document files which can be read in Microsoft Word and some other word processing programs; . xlsx spreadsheet files which can be read in Microsoft Excel and some other spreadsheet programs; .dat data files which may be text or multimedia; as well as GIS or mapping files in the fowlling formats: .mxd, .dbf, .prj, .sbn, .shp., .shp.xml; which may be opened in ArcGIS or other GIS software. [software requirements] These files were last accessed in 2017.

1.Introduction

Sales data collection is a crucial aspect of any manufacturing industry as it provides valuable insights about the performance of products, customer behaviour, and market trends. By gathering and analysing this data, manufacturers can make informed decisions about product development, pricing, and marketing strategies in Internet of Things (IoT) business environments like the dairy supply chain.

One of the most important benefits of the sales data collection process is that it allows manufacturers to identify their most successful products and target their efforts towards those areas. For example, if a manufacturer could notice that a particular product is selling well in a certain region, this information could be utilised to develop new products, optimise the supply chain or improve existing ones to meet the changing needs of customers.

This dataset includes information about 7 of MEVGAL’s products [1]. According to the above information the data published will help researchers to understand the dynamics of the dairy market and its consumption patterns, which is creating the fertile ground for synergies between academia and industry and eventually help the industry in making informed decisions regarding product development, pricing and market strategies in the IoT playground. The use of this dataset could also aim to understand the impact of various external factors on the dairy market such as the economic, environmental, and technological factors. It could help in understanding the current state of the dairy industry and identifying potential opportunities for growth and development.

1. Citation

Please cite the following papers when using this dataset:

I. Siniosoglou, K. Xouveroudis, V. Argyriou, T. Lagkas, S. K. Goudos, K. E. Psannis and P. Sarigiannidis, "Evaluating the Effect of Volatile Federated Timeseries on Modern DNNs: Attention over Long/Short Memory," in the 12th International Conference on Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST 2023), April 2023, Accepted

1. Dataset Modalities

The dataset includes data regarding the daily sales of a series of dairy product codes offered by MEVGAL. In particular, the dataset includes information gathered by the logistics division and agencies within the industrial infrastructures overseeing the production of each product code. The products included in this dataset represent the daily sales and logistics of a variety of yogurt-based stock. Each of the different files include the logistics for that product on a daily basis for three years, from 2020 to 2022.

3.1 Data Collection

The process of building this dataset involves several steps to ensure that the data is accurate, comprehensive and relevant.

The first step is to determine the specific data that is needed to support the business objectives of the industry, i.e., in this publication’s case the daily sales data.

Once the data requirements have been identified, the next step is to implement an effective sales data collection method. In MEVGAL’s case this is conducted through direct communication and reports generated each day by representatives & selling points.

It is also important for MEVGAL to ensure that the data collection process conducted is in an ethical and compliant manner, adhering to data privacy laws and regulation. The industry also has a data management plan in place to ensure that the data is securely stored and protected from unauthorised access.

The published dataset is consisted of 13 features providing information about the date and the number of products that have been sold. Finally, the dataset was anonymised in consideration to the privacy requirement of the data owner (MEVGAL).

File

Period

Number of Samples (days)

product 1 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 1 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 1 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 2 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 2 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 2 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 3 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 3 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 3 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 4 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 4 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 4 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

364

product 5 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 5 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 5 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 6 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

362

product 6 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 6 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 7 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

362

product 7 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 7 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

3.2 Dataset Overview

The following table enumerates and explains the features included across all of the included files.

Feature

Description

Unit

Day

day of the month

-

Month

Month

-

Year

Year

-

daily_unit_sales

Daily sales - the amount of products, measured in units, that during that specific day were sold

units

previous_year_daily_unit_sales

Previous Year’s sales - the amount of products, measured in units, that during that specific day were sold the previous year

units

percentage_difference_daily_unit_sales

The percentage difference between the two above values

%

daily_unit_sales_kg

The amount of products, measured in kilograms, that during that specific day were sold

kg

previous_year_daily_unit_sales_kg

Previous Year’s sales - the amount of products, measured in kilograms, that during that specific day were sold, the previous year

kg

percentage_difference_daily_unit_sales_kg

The percentage difference between the two above values

kg

daily_unit_returns_kg

The percentage of the products that were shipped to selling points and were returned

%

previous_year_daily_unit_returns_kg

The percentage of the products that were shipped to selling points and were returned the previous year

%

points_of_distribution

The amount of sales representatives through which the product was sold to the market for this year

previous_year_points_of_distribution

The amount of sales representatives through which the product was sold to the market for the same day for the previous year

Table 1 – Dataset Feature Description

1. Structure and Format

4.1 Dataset Structure

The provided dataset has the following structure:

Where:

Name

Type

Property

Readme.docx

Report

A File that contains the documentation of the Dataset.

product X

Folder

A folder containing the data of a product X.

product X YYYY.xlsx

Data file

An excel file containing the sales data of product X for year YYYY.

Table 2 - Dataset File Description

1. Acknowledgement

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 957406 (TERMINET).

References

[1] MEVGAL is a Greek dairy production company