The global Data Labeling Solution and Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated market value of $70 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by the burgeoning need for high-quality training data to enhance the accuracy and performance of AI models. Key growth drivers include the expanding application of AI in various industries like automotive (autonomous vehicles), healthcare (medical image analysis), and financial services (fraud detection). The increasing availability of diverse data types (text, image/video, audio) further contributes to market growth. However, challenges such as the high cost of data labeling, data privacy concerns, and the need for skilled professionals to manage and execute labeling projects pose certain restraints on market expansion. Segmentation by application (automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, others) and data type (text, image/video, audio) reveals distinct growth trajectories within the market. The automotive and healthcare sectors currently dominate, but the government and financial services segments are showing promising growth potential. The competitive landscape is marked by a mix of established players and emerging startups. Companies like Amazon Mechanical Turk, Appen, and Labelbox are leading the market, leveraging their expertise in crowdsourcing, automation, and specialized data labeling solutions. However, the market shows strong potential for innovation, particularly in the development of automated data labeling tools and the expansion of services into niche areas. Regional analysis indicates strong market penetration in North America and Europe, driven by early adoption of AI technologies and robust research and development efforts. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years fueled by rapid technological advancements and a rising demand for AI solutions. Further investment in R&D focused on automation, improved data security, and the development of more effective data labeling methodologies will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of this rapidly expanding market.

The open-source data labeling tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality training data in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The market's expansion is fueled by several factors: the rising adoption of AI across various sectors (including IT, automotive, healthcare, and finance), the need for cost-effective data annotation solutions, and the inherent flexibility and customization offered by open-source tools. While cloud-based solutions currently dominate the market due to scalability and accessibility, on-premise deployments remain significant, particularly for organizations with stringent data security requirements. The market's growth is further propelled by advancements in automation and semi-supervised learning techniques within data labeling, leading to increased efficiency and reduced annotation costs. Geographic distribution shows a strong concentration in North America and Europe, reflecting the higher adoption of AI technologies in these regions; however, Asia-Pacific is emerging as a rapidly growing market due to increasing investment in AI and the availability of a large workforce for data annotation. Despite the promising outlook, certain challenges restrain market growth. The complexity of implementing and maintaining open-source tools, along with the need for specialized technical expertise, can pose barriers to entry for smaller organizations. Furthermore, the quality control and data governance aspects of open-source annotation require careful consideration. The potential for data bias and the need for robust validation processes necessitate a strategic approach to ensure data accuracy and reliability. Competition is intensifying with both established and emerging players vying for market share, forcing companies to focus on differentiation through innovation and specialized functionalities within their tools. The market is anticipated to maintain a healthy growth trajectory in the coming years, with increasing adoption across diverse sectors and geographical regions. The continued advancements in automation and the growing emphasis on data quality will be key drivers of future market expansion.

TagX data annotation services are a set of tools and processes used to accurately label and classify large amounts of data for use in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The services are designed to be highly accurate, efficient, and customizable, allowing for a wide range of data types and use cases.

The process typically begins with a team of trained annotators reviewing and categorizing the data, using a variety of annotation tools and techniques, such as text classification, image annotation, and video annotation. The annotators may also use natural language processing and other advanced techniques to extract relevant information and context from the data.

Once the data has been annotated, it is then validated and checked for accuracy by a team of quality assurance specialists. Any errors or inconsistencies are corrected, and the data is then prepared for use in machine learning and AI models.

TagX annotation services can be applied to a wide range of data types, including text, images, videos, and audio. The services can be customized to meet the specific needs of each client, including the type of data, the level of annotation required, and the desired level of accuracy.

TagX data annotation services provide a powerful and efficient way to prepare large amounts of data for use in machine learning and AI applications, allowing organizations to extract valuable insights and improve their decision-making processes.

The AI data labeling solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality data to train and improve the accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $5 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. The proliferation of AI applications across diverse sectors, including automotive, healthcare, and finance, necessitates vast amounts of labeled data. Cloud-based solutions are gaining prominence due to their scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation techniques and the emergence of specialized AI data labeling platforms are contributing to market expansion. However, challenges such as data privacy concerns, the need for highly skilled professionals, and the complexities of handling diverse data formats continue to restrain market growth to some extent. The market segmentation reveals that the cloud-based solutions segment is expected to dominate due to its inherent advantages over on-premise solutions. In terms of application, the automotive sector is projected to exhibit the fastest growth, driven by the increasing adoption of autonomous driving technology and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). The healthcare industry is also a major contributor, with the rise of AI-powered diagnostic tools and personalized medicine driving demand for accurate medical image and data labeling. Geographically, North America currently holds a significant market share, but the Asia-Pacific region is poised for rapid growth owing to increasing investments in AI and technological advancements. The competitive landscape is marked by a diverse range of established players and emerging startups, fostering innovation and competition within the market. The continued evolution of AI and its integration across various industries ensures the continued expansion of the AI data labeling solution market in the coming years.

Market Analysis: The AI Data Labeling Solution market is anticipated to grow at a substantial CAGR of XX% during the forecast period of 2025-2033. This growth is driven by the increasing adoption of AI and ML technologies, along with the demand for high-quality annotated data for model training. The market is segmented by application (IT, automotive, healthcare, financial, etc.), type (cloud-based, on-premise), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, etc.). The cloud-based segment is expected to hold a dominant share due to its flexibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. North America is expected to lead the market due to the early adoption of AI technologies. Key Trends and Challenges: One of the key trends in the AI Data Labeling Solution market is the rise of automated and semi-automated data labeling tools. These tools utilize AI algorithms to streamline the process, reducing the cost and time required to label large datasets. Another notable trend is the increasing demand for AI-labeled data in sectors such as autonomous driving, healthcare, and finance. However, the market also faces challenges, including the lack of standardized data labeling practices and regulations, as well as concerns over data privacy and security.

With the advent and expansion of social networking, the amount of generated text data has seen a sharp increase. In order to handle such a huge volume of text data, new and improved text mining techniques are a necessity. One of the characteristics of text data that makes text mining difficult, is multi-labelity. In order to build a robust and effective text classification method which is an integral part of text mining research, we must consider this property more closely. This kind of property is not unique to text data as it can be found in non-text (e.g., numeric) data as well. However, in text data, it is most prevalent. This property also puts the text classification problem in the domain of multi-label classification (MLC), where each instance is associated with a subset of class-labels instead of a single class, as in conventional classification. In this paper, we explore how the generation of pseudo labels (i.e., combinations of existing class labels) can help us in performing better text classification and under what kind of circumstances. During the classification, the high and sparse dimensionality of text data has also been considered. Although, here we are proposing and evaluating a text classification technique, our main focus is on the handling of the multi-labelity of text data while utilizing the correlation among multiple labels existing in the data set. Our text classification technique is called pseudo-LSC (pseudo-Label Based Subspace Clustering). It is a subspace clustering algorithm that considers the high and sparse dimensionality as well as the correlation among different class labels during the classification process to provide better performance than existing approaches. Results on three real world multi-label data sets provide us insight into how the multi-labelity is handled in our classification process and shows the effectiveness of our approach.

Data Collection and Labeling Market size was valued at USD 18.18 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 93.37 Billion by 2031 growing at a CAGR of 25.03% from 2024 to 2031.

Key Market Drivers:
• Increasing Reliance on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: As AI and machine learning become more prevalent in numerous industries, the necessity for reliable data gathering and categorization grows. By 2025, the AI business is estimated to be worth $126 billion, emphasizing the significance of high-quality datasets for effective modeling.
• Increasing Emphasis on Data Privacy and Compliance: With stronger requirements such as GDPR and CCPA, enterprises must prioritize data collection methods that assure privacy and compliance. The global data privacy industry is expected to grow to USD $6.7 Bbillion by 2023, highlighting the need for responsible data handling methods in labeling processes.
• Emergence Of Advanced Data Annotation Tools: The emergence of enhanced data annotation tools is being driven by technological improvements, which are improving efficiency and lowering costs. Global Data Annotation tools market is expected to grow significantly, facilitating faster and more accurate labeling of data, essential for meeting the increasing demands of AI applications.

Context: Exception handling (EH) bugs stem from incorrect usage of exception handling mechanisms (EHMs) and often incur severe consequences (e.g., system downtime, data loss, and security risk). Tracking EH bugs is particularly relevant for contemporary systems (e.g., cloud- and AI-based systems), in which the software's sophisticated logic is an additional threat to the correct use of the EHM. On top of that, bug reporters seldom can tag EH bugs --- since it may require an encompassing knowledge of the software's EH strategy. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, there is no automated procedure to identify EH bugs from report descriptions.Objective: First, we aim to evaluate the extent to which Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) can be used to reliably label EH bugs using the text fields from bug reports (e.g., summary, description, and comments). Second, we aim to provide a reliably labeled dataset that the community can use in future endeavors. Overall, we expect our work to raise the community's awareness regarding the importance of EH bugs.Method: We manually analyzed 4,516 bug reports from the four main components of Apache’s Hadoop project, out of which we labeled ~20% (943) as EH bugs. We also labeled 2,584 non-EH bugs analyzing their bug-fixing code and creating a dataset composed of 7,100 bug reports. Then, we used word embedding techniques (Bag-of-Words and TF-IDF) to summarize the textual fields of bug reports. Subsequently, we used these embeddings to fit five classes of ML methods and evaluate them on unseen data. We also evaluated a pre-trained transformer-based model using the complete textual fields. We have also evaluated whether considering only EH keywords is enough to achieve high predictive performance.Results: Our results show that using a pre-trained DistilBERT with a linear layer trained with our proposed dataset can reasonably label EH bugs, achieving ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.88. The combination of NLP and ML traditional techniques achieved ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.74 and recall up to 0.56. As a sanity check, we also evaluate methods using embeddings extracted solely from keywords. Considering ROC-AUC as the primary concern, for the majority of ML methods tested, the analysis suggests that keywords alone are not sufficient to characterize reports of EH bugs, although this can change based on other metrics (such as recall and precision) or ML methods (e.g., Random Forest).Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the problem of automatic labeling of EH bugs. Based on our results, we can conclude that the use of ML techniques, specially transformer-base models, sounds promising to automate the task of labeling EH bugs. Overall, we hope (i) that our work will contribute towards raising awareness around EH bugs; and (ii) that our (publicly available) dataset will serve as a benchmarking dataset, paving the way for follow-up works. Additionally, our findings can be used to build tools that help maintainers flesh out EH bugs during the triage process.

Remote cameras (“trail cameras”) are a popular tool for non-invasive, continuous wildlife monitoring, and as they become more prevalent in wildlife research, machine learning (ML) is increasingly used to automate or accelerate the labor-intensive process of labelling (i.e., tagging) photos. Human-machine hybrid tagging approaches have been shown to greatly increase tagging efficiency (i.e., time to tag a single image). However, those potential increases hinge on the extent to which an ML model makes correct vs. incorrect predictions. We performed an experiment using a ML model that produces bounding boxes around animals, people, and vehicles in remote camera imagery (MegaDetector), to consider the impact of a ML model’s performance on its ability to accelerate human labeling. Six participants tagged trail camera images collected from 12 sites in Vermont and Maine, USA (January-September 2022) using three tagging methods (one with ML bounding box assistance and two without assistance).

The data collection and labeling market is experiencing robust growth, fueled by the escalating demand for high-quality training data in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% over the forecast period (2025-2033), reaching approximately $75 billion by 2033. This expansion is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of AI across diverse sectors, including healthcare (medical image analysis, drug discovery), automotive (autonomous driving systems), finance (fraud detection, risk assessment), and retail (personalized recommendations, inventory management). The rising complexity of AI models and the need for more diverse and nuanced datasets are significant contributing factors to this growth. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation tools and techniques, such as active learning and synthetic data generation, are streamlining the data labeling process and making it more cost-effective. However, challenges remain. Data privacy concerns and regulations like GDPR necessitate robust data security measures, adding to the cost and complexity of data collection and labeling. The shortage of skilled data annotators also hinders market growth, necessitating investments in training and upskilling programs. Despite these restraints, the market’s inherent potential, coupled with ongoing technological advancements and increased industry investments, ensures sustained expansion in the coming years. Geographic distribution shows strong concentration in North America and Europe initially, but Asia-Pacific is poised for rapid growth due to increasing AI adoption and the availability of a large workforce. This makes strategic partnerships and global expansion crucial for market players aiming for long-term success.

Methods used to verify calorie, fat, carbohydrate, and protein content statements on alcohol beverage labels and advertisements.

Global Protein Labeling market size earned around $2,505.70 M in 2023 and is expected to reach $6,255.40 M by 2032, with a projected CAGR of 10.70%.

Variable Data Printing Labels Market Report is Segmented by Component (Hardware, Software and Services), by Label (Release Liner Labels and Linerless Labels), by Printing Method (Thermal Transfer Printing, Direct Thermal Printing, Inkjet Printing, Electrophotography, Flexographic Printing and Other Methods), by End-Use Industry (Healthcare, Retail & E-Commerce, Food & Beverage, Logistics and Other End-Use Industries), and by Geography (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America and Middle East and Africa). The Market Sizing and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD) for all the Above Segments.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Ai Training Data market size is USD 1865.2 million in 2023 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.50% from 2023 to 2030.

The demand for Ai Training Data is rising due to the rising demand for labelled data and diversification of AI applications.
Demand for Image/Video remains higher in the Ai Training Data market.
The Healthcare category held the highest Ai Training Data market revenue share in 2023.
North American Ai Training Data will continue to lead, whereas the Asia-Pacific Ai Training Data market will experience the most substantial growth until 2030.

Market Dynamics of AI Training Data Market

Key Drivers of AI Training Data Market

Rising Demand for Industry-Specific Datasets to Provide Viable Market Output

A key driver in the AI Training Data market is the escalating demand for industry-specific datasets. As businesses across sectors increasingly adopt AI applications, the need for highly specialized and domain-specific training data becomes critical. Industries such as healthcare, finance, and automotive require datasets that reflect the nuances and complexities unique to their domains. This demand fuels the growth of providers offering curated datasets tailored to specific industries, ensuring that AI models are trained with relevant and representative data, leading to enhanced performance and accuracy in diverse applications.

In July 2021, Amazon and Hugging Face, a provider of open-source natural language processing (NLP) technologies, have collaborated. The objective of this partnership was to accelerate the deployment of sophisticated NLP capabilities while making it easier for businesses to use cutting-edge machine-learning models. Following this partnership, Hugging Face will suggest Amazon Web Services as a cloud service provider for its clients.

(Source: about:blank)

Advancements in Data Labelling Technologies to Propel Market Growth

The continuous advancements in data labelling technologies serve as another significant driver for the AI Training Data market. Efficient and accurate labelling is essential for training robust AI models. Innovations in automated and semi-automated labelling tools, leveraging techniques like computer vision and natural language processing, streamline the data annotation process. These technologies not only improve the speed and scalability of dataset preparation but also contribute to the overall quality and consistency of labelled data. The adoption of advanced labelling solutions addresses industry challenges related to data annotation, driving the market forward amidst the increasing demand for high-quality training data.

In June 2021, Scale AI and MIT Media Lab, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology research centre, began working together. To help doctors treat patients more effectively, this cooperation attempted to utilize ML in healthcare.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325854/

Restraint Factors Of AI Training Data Market

Data Privacy and Security Concerns to Restrict Market Growth

A significant restraint in the AI Training Data market is the growing concern over data privacy and security. As the demand for diverse and expansive datasets rises, so does the need for sensitive information. However, the collection and utilization of personal or proprietary data raise ethical and privacy issues. Companies and data providers face challenges in ensuring compliance with regulations and safeguarding against unauthorized access or misuse of sensitive information. Addressing these concerns becomes imperative to gain user trust and navigate the evolving landscape of data protection laws, which, in turn, poses a restraint on the smooth progression of the AI Training Data market.

How did COVID–19 impact the Ai Training Data market?

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a multifaceted impact on the AI Training Data market. While the demand for AI solutions has accelerated across industries, the availability and collection of training data faced challenges. The pandemic disrupted traditional data collection methods, leading to a slowdown in the generation of labeled datasets due to restrictions on physical operations. Simultaneously, the surge in remote work and the increased reliance on AI-driven technologies for various applications fueled the need for diverse and relevant training data. This duali...

MULTI-LABEL ASRS DATASET CLASSIFICATION USING SEMI-SUPERVISED SUBSPACE CLUSTERING

MOHAMMAD SALIM AHMED, LATIFUR KHAN, NIKUNJ OZA, AND MANDAVA RAJESWARI

Abstract. There has been a lot of research targeting text classification. Many of them focus on a particular characteristic of text data - multi-labelity. This arises due to the fact that a document may be associated with multiple classes at the same time. The consequence of such a characteristic is the low performance of traditional binary or multi-class classification techniques on multi-label text data. In this paper, we propose a text classification technique that considers this characteristic and provides very good performance. Our multi-label text classification approach is an extension of our previously formulated [3] multi-class text classification approach called SISC (Semi-supervised Impurity based Subspace Clustering). We call this new classification model as SISC-ML(SISC Multi-Label). Empirical evaluation on real world multi-label NASA ASRS (Aviation Safety Reporting System) data set reveals that our approach outperforms state-of-theart text classification as well as subspace clustering algorithms.

The project contains the implementation of the method described in: Wang et al., "Automatic labeling of vascular structures with topological constraints via HMM", MICCAI 2017. We propose a novel graph labeling approach to anatomically label vascular structures of interest. Our algorithm can handle different topologies, like circle, chain and tree. By using coordinate independent geometrical features, it does not require prior global alignment.

The open dataset, software, and other files accompanying the manuscript "An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models," submitted for publication to Integrated Materials and Manufacturing Innovations. Machine learning and autonomy are increasingly prevalent in materials science, but existing models are often trained or tuned using idealized data as absolute ground truths. In actual materials science, "ground truth" is often a matter of interpretation and is more readily determined by consensus. Here we present the data, software, and other files for a study using as-obtained diffraction data as a test case for evaluating the performance of machine learning models in the presence of differing expert opinions. We demonstrate that experts with similar backgrounds can disagree greatly even for something as intuitive as using diffraction to identify the start and end of a phase transformation. We then use a logarithmic likelihood method to evaluate the performance of machine learning models in relation to the consensus expert labels and their variance. We further illustrate this method's efficacy in ranking a number of state-of-the-art phase mapping algorithms. We propose a materials data challenge centered around the problem of evaluating models based on consensus with uncertainty. The data, labels, and code used in this study are all available online at data.gov, and the interested reader is encouraged to replicate and improve the existing models or to propose alternative methods for evaluating algorithmic performance.

In situ profiling of subcellular proteomic networks in primary and living systems, such as primary cells from native tissues or clinic samples, is crucial for the understanding of life processes and diseases, yet challenging for the current proximity labeling methods (e.g., BioID, APEX) due to their necessity of genetic engineering. Here we report CAT-S, a state-of-the-art bioorthogonal photocatalytic chemistry-enabled proximity labeling method, that expands proximity labeling to a wide range of primary living samples for in situ profiling of subcellular proteomes. Powered by the newly introduced thioQM labeling warhead and targeted bioorthogonal photocatalytic decaging chemistry, CAT-S enables labeling of mitochondrial proteins in living cells with high efficiency and specificity (up to 87%). We applied CAT-S to diverse cell cultures, mouse tissues as well as primary T cells from human blood, portraying the native-state mitochondrial proteomic characteristics, and unveiled a set of hidden mitochondrial proteins in human proteome. Furthermore, CAT-S allows quantitative analysis of the in situ proteomic perturbations on dysfunctional tissue samples, exampled by diabetic mouse kidneys, and revealed the alterations of lipid metabolism machinery that drive the disease progression. Given the advantages of non-genetic operation, generality, efficiency as well as spatiotemporal resolution, CAT-S may open new avenues as a proximity labeling strategy for in situ investigation of subcellular proteomic landscape of primary living samples that are otherwise inaccessible.

The Data Annotation and Collection Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $10 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $45 billion by 2033. This significant expansion is fueled by several key factors. The surge in autonomous driving initiatives necessitates high-quality data annotation for training self-driving systems, while the burgeoning smart healthcare sector relies heavily on annotated medical images and data for accurate diagnoses and treatment planning. Similarly, the growth of smart security systems and financial risk control applications demands precise data annotation for improved accuracy and efficiency. Image annotation currently dominates the market, followed by text annotation, reflecting the widespread use of computer vision and natural language processing. However, video and voice annotation segments are showing rapid growth, driven by advancements in AI-powered video analytics and voice recognition technologies. Competition is intense, with both established technology giants like Alibaba Cloud and Baidu, and specialized data annotation companies like Appen and Scale Labs vying for market share. Geographic distribution shows a strong concentration in North America and Europe initially, but Asia-Pacific is expected to emerge as a major growth region in the coming years, driven primarily by China and India's expanding technology sectors. The market, however, faces certain challenges. The high cost of data annotation, particularly for complex tasks such as video annotation, can pose a barrier to entry for smaller companies. Ensuring data quality and accuracy remains a significant concern, requiring robust quality control mechanisms. Furthermore, ethical considerations surrounding data privacy and bias in algorithms require careful attention. To overcome these challenges, companies are investing in automation tools and techniques like synthetic data generation, alongside developing more sophisticated quality control measures. The future of the Data Annotation and Collection Services market will likely be shaped by advancements in AI and ML technologies, the increasing availability of diverse data sets, and the growing awareness of ethical considerations surrounding data usage.

This repository contains code for reproducing experiments done in Marasovic and Frank (2018). Paper abstract: For over a decade, machine learning has been used to extract opinion-holder-target structures from text to answer the question "Who expressed what kind of sentiment towards what?". Recent neural approaches do not outperform the state-of-the-art feature-based models for Opinion Role Labeling (ORL). We suspect this is due to the scarcity of labeled training data and address this issue using different multi-task learning (MTL) techniques with a related task which has substantially more data, i.e. Semantic Role Labeling (SRL). We show that two MTL models improve significantly over the single-task model for labeling of both holders and targets, on the development and the test sets. We found that the vanilla MTL model, which makes predictions using only shared ORL and SRL features, performs the best. With deeper analysis, we determine what works and what might be done to make further improvements for ORL. Data for ORL Download MPQA 2.0 corpus. Check mpqa2-pytools for example usage. Splits can be found in the datasplit folder. Data for SRL The data is provided by: CoNLL-2005 Shared Task, but the original words are from the Penn Treebank dataset, which is not publicly available. How to train models? python main.py --adv_coef 0.0 --model fs --exp_setup_id new --n_layers_orl 0 --begin_fold 0 --end_fold 4 python main.py --adv_coef 0.0 --model html --exp_setup_id new --n_layers_orl 1 --n_layers_shared 2 --begin_fold 0 --end_fold 4 python main.py --adv_coef 0.0 --model sp --exp_setup_id new --n_layers_orl 3 --begin_fold 0 --end_fold 4 python main.py --adv_coef 0.1 --model asp --exp_setup_id prior --n_layers_orl 3 --begin_fold 0 --end_fold 10