The data collection and labeling market is experiencing robust growth, fueled by the escalating demand for high-quality training data in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to achieve a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% over the forecast period (2025-2033), reaching approximately $75 billion by 2033. This expansion is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of AI across diverse sectors, including healthcare (medical image analysis, drug discovery), automotive (autonomous driving systems), finance (fraud detection, risk assessment), and retail (personalized recommendations, inventory management). The rising complexity of AI models and the need for more diverse and nuanced datasets are significant contributing factors to this growth. Furthermore, advancements in data annotation tools and techniques, such as active learning and synthetic data generation, are streamlining the data labeling process and making it more cost-effective. However, challenges remain. Data privacy concerns and regulations like GDPR necessitate robust data security measures, adding to the cost and complexity of data collection and labeling. The shortage of skilled data annotators also hinders market growth, necessitating investments in training and upskilling programs. Despite these restraints, the market’s inherent potential, coupled with ongoing technological advancements and increased industry investments, ensures sustained expansion in the coming years. Geographic distribution shows strong concentration in North America and Europe initially, but Asia-Pacific is poised for rapid growth due to increasing AI adoption and the availability of a large workforce. This makes strategic partnerships and global expansion crucial for market players aiming for long-term success.

TagX data annotation services are a set of tools and processes used to accurately label and classify large amounts of data for use in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The services are designed to be highly accurate, efficient, and customizable, allowing for a wide range of data types and use cases.

The process typically begins with a team of trained annotators reviewing and categorizing the data, using a variety of annotation tools and techniques, such as text classification, image annotation, and video annotation. The annotators may also use natural language processing and other advanced techniques to extract relevant information and context from the data.

Once the data has been annotated, it is then validated and checked for accuracy by a team of quality assurance specialists. Any errors or inconsistencies are corrected, and the data is then prepared for use in machine learning and AI models.

TagX annotation services can be applied to a wide range of data types, including text, images, videos, and audio. The services can be customized to meet the specific needs of each client, including the type of data, the level of annotation required, and the desired level of accuracy.

TagX data annotation services provide a powerful and efficient way to prepare large amounts of data for use in machine learning and AI applications, allowing organizations to extract valuable insights and improve their decision-making processes.

Market Analysis: The AI Data Labeling Solution market is anticipated to grow at a substantial CAGR of XX% during the forecast period of 2025-2033. This growth is driven by the increasing adoption of AI and ML technologies, along with the demand for high-quality annotated data for model training. The market is segmented by application (IT, automotive, healthcare, financial, etc.), type (cloud-based, on-premise), and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, etc.). The cloud-based segment is expected to hold a dominant share due to its flexibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. North America is expected to lead the market due to the early adoption of AI technologies. Key Trends and Challenges: One of the key trends in the AI Data Labeling Solution market is the rise of automated and semi-automated data labeling tools. These tools utilize AI algorithms to streamline the process, reducing the cost and time required to label large datasets. Another notable trend is the increasing demand for AI-labeled data in sectors such as autonomous driving, healthcare, and finance. However, the market also faces challenges, including the lack of standardized data labeling practices and regulations, as well as concerns over data privacy and security.

The open-source data labeling tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for high-quality training data in machine learning and artificial intelligence applications. The market's expansion is fueled by several factors: the rising adoption of AI across various sectors (including IT, automotive, healthcare, and finance), the need for cost-effective data annotation solutions, and the inherent flexibility and customization offered by open-source tools. While cloud-based solutions currently dominate the market due to scalability and accessibility, on-premise deployments remain significant, particularly for organizations with stringent data security requirements. The market's growth is further propelled by advancements in automation and semi-supervised learning techniques within data labeling, leading to increased efficiency and reduced annotation costs. Geographic distribution shows a strong concentration in North America and Europe, reflecting the higher adoption of AI technologies in these regions; however, Asia-Pacific is emerging as a rapidly growing market due to increasing investment in AI and the availability of a large workforce for data annotation. Despite the promising outlook, certain challenges restrain market growth. The complexity of implementing and maintaining open-source tools, along with the need for specialized technical expertise, can pose barriers to entry for smaller organizations. Furthermore, the quality control and data governance aspects of open-source annotation require careful consideration. The potential for data bias and the need for robust validation processes necessitate a strategic approach to ensure data accuracy and reliability. Competition is intensifying with both established and emerging players vying for market share, forcing companies to focus on differentiation through innovation and specialized functionalities within their tools. The market is anticipated to maintain a healthy growth trajectory in the coming years, with increasing adoption across diverse sectors and geographical regions. The continued advancements in automation and the growing emphasis on data quality will be key drivers of future market expansion.

The global data labeling tools market is projected to reach a value of USD 12.19 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 31.9% during the forecast period of 2025-2033. The growing volume of unstructured data, the increasing adoption of AI and ML technologies, and the need for high-quality labeled data for training machine learning models are the key factors driving market growth. The market is segmented by type into cloud-based and on-premises solutions, with the cloud-based segment holding a dominant share due to its scalability, cost-effectiveness, and flexibility. By application, the market is divided into IT, automotive, government, healthcare, financial services, retail, and others. The IT segment is expected to account for the largest share during the forecast period as businesses increasingly adopt AI and ML technologies to automate their processes and gain insights from data.

The U.S. Data Collection And Labeling Market size was valued at USD 855.0 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 3964.16 million by 2032, exhibiting a CAGR of 24.5 % during the forecasts period. The US Data Collection and Labeling Market implies the process of gathering and labeling data for the creation of machine learning, artificial intelligence, as well as other data-related applications. The market helps various sectors including retail health care, automotive, and finance through supplying labeled data which is critical in training and improving models used in AI and overall decision-making. Some of the primary applications are related to image and speech recognition, self-driving cars and many others related to Predictive analysis. New directions promote the development of a greater degree of automatization of processes, the use of highly specialized annotation tools, and the need for further development of specialized data labeling services. The market is also experiencing incorporation of artificial intelligence for the automation of several data labeling tasks. Recent developments include: In July 2022, IBM announced the acquisition of Databand.ai to augment its software portfolio across AI, data and automation. For the record, Databand.ai was IBM's fifth acquisition in 2022, signifying the latter’s commitment to hybrid cloud and AI skills and capabilities. , In June 2022, Oracle completed the acquisition of Cerner as the Austin-based company gears up to ramp up its cloud business in the hospital and health system landscape. .

With the advent and expansion of social networking, the amount of generated text data has seen a sharp increase. In order to handle such a huge volume of text data, new and improved text mining techniques are a necessity. One of the characteristics of text data that makes text mining difficult, is multi-labelity. In order to build a robust and effective text classification method which is an integral part of text mining research, we must consider this property more closely. This kind of property is not unique to text data as it can be found in non-text (e.g., numeric) data as well. However, in text data, it is most prevalent. This property also puts the text classification problem in the domain of multi-label classification (MLC), where each instance is associated with a subset of class-labels instead of a single class, as in conventional classification. In this paper, we explore how the generation of pseudo labels (i.e., combinations of existing class labels) can help us in performing better text classification and under what kind of circumstances. During the classification, the high and sparse dimensionality of text data has also been considered. Although, here we are proposing and evaluating a text classification technique, our main focus is on the handling of the multi-labelity of text data while utilizing the correlation among multiple labels existing in the data set. Our text classification technique is called pseudo-LSC (pseudo-Label Based Subspace Clustering). It is a subspace clustering algorithm that considers the high and sparse dimensionality as well as the correlation among different class labels during the classification process to provide better performance than existing approaches. Results on three real world multi-label data sets provide us insight into how the multi-labelity is handled in our classification process and shows the effectiveness of our approach.

Data Collection and Labeling Market size was valued at USD 18.18 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 93.37 Billion by 2031 growing at a CAGR of 25.03% from 2024 to 2031.

Key Market Drivers:
• Increasing Reliance on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: As AI and machine learning become more prevalent in numerous industries, the necessity for reliable data gathering and categorization grows. By 2025, the AI business is estimated to be worth $126 billion, emphasizing the significance of high-quality datasets for effective modeling.
• Increasing Emphasis on Data Privacy and Compliance: With stronger requirements such as GDPR and CCPA, enterprises must prioritize data collection methods that assure privacy and compliance. The global data privacy industry is expected to grow to USD $6.7 Bbillion by 2023, highlighting the need for responsible data handling methods in labeling processes.
• Emergence Of Advanced Data Annotation Tools: The emergence of enhanced data annotation tools is being driven by technological improvements, which are improving efficiency and lowering costs. Global Data Annotation tools market is expected to grow significantly, facilitating faster and more accurate labeling of data, essential for meeting the increasing demands of AI applications.

FSDKaggle2018 is an audio dataset containing 11,073 audio files annotated with 41 labels of the AudioSet Ontology. FSDKaggle2018 has been used for the DCASE Challenge 2018 Task 2, which was run as a Kaggle competition titled Freesound General-Purpose Audio Tagging Challenge.

Citation

If you use the FSDKaggle2018 dataset or part of it, please cite our DCASE 2018 paper:

Eduardo Fonseca, Manoj Plakal, Frederic Font, Daniel P. W. Ellis, Xavier Favory, Jordi Pons, Xavier Serra. "General-purpose Tagging of Freesound Audio with AudioSet Labels: Task Description, Dataset, and Baseline". Proceedings of the DCASE 2018 Workshop (2018)

You can also consider citing our ISMIR 2017 paper, which describes how we gathered the manual annotations included in FSDKaggle2018.

Eduardo Fonseca, Jordi Pons, Xavier Favory, Frederic Font, Dmitry Bogdanov, Andres Ferraro, Sergio Oramas, Alastair Porter, and Xavier Serra, "Freesound Datasets: A Platform for the Creation of Open Audio Datasets", In Proceedings of the 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Suzhou, China, 2017

Contact

You are welcome to contact Eduardo Fonseca should you have any questions at eduardo.fonseca@upf.edu.

About this dataset

Freesound Dataset Kaggle 2018 (or FSDKaggle2018 for short) is an audio dataset containing 11,073 audio files annotated with 41 labels of the AudioSet Ontology [1]. FSDKaggle2018 has been used for the Task 2 of the Detection and Classification of Acoustic Scenes and Events (DCASE) Challenge 2018. Please visit the DCASE2018 Challenge Task 2 website for more information. This Task was hosted on the Kaggle platform as a competition titled Freesound General-Purpose Audio Tagging Challenge. It was organized by researchers from the Music Technology Group of Universitat Pompeu Fabra, and from Google Research’s Machine Perception Team.

The goal of this competition was to build an audio tagging system that can categorize an audio clip as belonging to one of a set of 41 diverse categories drawn from the AudioSet Ontology.

All audio samples in this dataset are gathered from Freesound [2] and are provided here as uncompressed PCM 16 bit, 44.1 kHz, mono audio files. Note that because Freesound content is collaboratively contributed, recording quality and techniques can vary widely.

The ground truth data provided in this dataset has been obtained after a data labeling process which is described below in the Data labeling process section. FSDKaggle2018 clips are unequally distributed in the following 41 categories of the AudioSet Ontology:

"Acoustic_guitar", "Applause", "Bark", "Bass_drum", "Burping_or_eructation", "Bus", "Cello", "Chime", "Clarinet", "Computer_keyboard", "Cough", "Cowbell", "Double_bass", "Drawer_open_or_close", "Electric_piano", "Fart", "Finger_snapping", "Fireworks", "Flute", "Glockenspiel", "Gong", "Gunshot_or_gunfire", "Harmonica", "Hi-hat", "Keys_jangling", "Knock", "Laughter", "Meow", "Microwave_oven", "Oboe", "Saxophone", "Scissors", "Shatter", "Snare_drum", "Squeak", "Tambourine", "Tearing", "Telephone", "Trumpet", "Violin_or_fiddle", "Writing".

Some other relevant characteristics of FSDKaggle2018:

• The dataset is split into a train set and a test set.

• The train set is meant to be for system development and includes ~9.5k samples unequally distributed among 41 categories. The minimum number of audio samples per category in the train set is 94, and the maximum 300. The duration of the audio samples ranges from 300ms to 30s due to the diversity of the sound categories and the preferences of Freesound users when recording sounds. The total duration of the train set is roughly 18h.

• Out of the ~9.5k samples from the train set, ~3.7k have manually-verified ground truth annotations and ~5.8k have non-verified annotations. The non-verified annotations of the train set have a quality estimate of at least 65-70% in each category. Checkout the Data labeling process section below for more information about this aspect.

• Non-verified annotations in the train set are properly flagged in train.csv so that participants can opt to use this information during the development of their systems.

• The test set is composed of 1.6k samples with manually-verified annotations and with a similar category distribution than that of the train set. The total duration of the test set is roughly 2h.

• All audio samples in this dataset have a single label (i.e. are only annotated with one label). Checkout the Data labeling process section below for more information about this aspect. A single label should be predicted for each file in the test set.

Data labeling process

The data labeling process started from a manual mapping between Freesound tags and AudioSet Ontology categories (or labels), which was carried out by researchers at the Music Technology Group, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona. Using this mapping, a number of Freesound audio samples were automatically annotated with labels from the AudioSet Ontology. These annotations can be understood as weak labels since they express the presence of a sound category in an audio sample.

Then, a data validation process was carried out in which a number of participants did listen to the annotated sounds and manually assessed the presence/absence of an automatically assigned sound category, according to the AudioSet category description.

Audio samples in FSDKaggle2018 are only annotated with a single ground truth label (see train.csv). A total of 3,710 annotations included in the train set of FSDKaggle2018 are annotations that have been manually validated as present and predominant (some with inter-annotator agreement but not all of them). This means that in most cases there is no additional acoustic material other than the labeled category. In few cases there may be some additional sound events, but these additional events won't belong to any of the 41 categories of FSDKaggle2018.

The rest of the annotations have not been manually validated and therefore some of them could be inaccurate. Nonetheless, we have estimated that at least 65-70% of the non-verified annotations per category in the train set are indeed correct. It can happen that some of these non-verified audio samples present several sound sources even though only one label is provided as ground truth. These additional sources are typically out of the set of the 41 categories, but in a few cases they could be within.

More details about the data labeling process can be found in [3].

License

FSDKaggle2018 has licenses at two different levels, as explained next.

All sounds in Freesound are released under Creative Commons (CC) licenses, and each audio clip has its own license as defined by the audio clip uploader in Freesound. For attribution purposes and to facilitate attribution of these files to third parties, we include a relation of the audio clips included in FSDKaggle2018 and their corresponding license. The licenses are specified in the files train_post_competition.csv and test_post_competition_scoring_clips.csv.

In addition, FSDKaggle2018 as a whole is the result of a curation process and it has an additional license. FSDKaggle2018 is released under CC-BY. This license is specified in the LICENSE-DATASET file downloaded with the FSDKaggle2018.doc zip file.

Files

FSDKaggle2018 can be downloaded as a series of zip files with the following directory structure:

root
│

└───FSDKaggle2018.audio_train/            Audio clips in the train set
│

└───FSDKaggle2018.audio_test/            Audio clips in the test set
│

└───FSDKaggle2018.meta/               Files for evaluation setup
│  │

│  └───train_post_competition.csv          Data split and ground truth for the train set
│  │

│  └───test_post_competition_scoring_clips.csv   Ground truth for the test set

│

└───FSDKaggle2018.doc/
  │

  └───README.md                  The dataset description file you are reading
  │

  └───LICENSE-DATASET             

Market Overview The global Data Annotation and Labeling (DAL) solutions market is projected to reach a value of XXX million by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of XX% over the forecast period 2025-2033. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across various industries. AI and ML models require large amounts of labeled data to train, and DAL solutions streamline this process, making them essential for data-intensive applications. Segmentation and Trends The DAL market is segmented based on type, application, and region. By type, the video data segment holds the largest market share due to its广泛的applications in sectors such as autonomous vehicles and video surveillance. By application, the healthcare segment is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period due to the increasing integration of AI in medical diagnostics and drug development. Geographically, North America currently dominates the market, but Asia Pacific is expected to emerge as a significant growth region owing to the rapid digitization of the region and the increasing adoption of AI in various industries.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Ai Training Data market size is USD 1865.2 million in 2023 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.50% from 2023 to 2030.

The demand for Ai Training Data is rising due to the rising demand for labelled data and diversification of AI applications.
Demand for Image/Video remains higher in the Ai Training Data market.
The Healthcare category held the highest Ai Training Data market revenue share in 2023.
North American Ai Training Data will continue to lead, whereas the Asia-Pacific Ai Training Data market will experience the most substantial growth until 2030.

Market Dynamics of AI Training Data Market

Key Drivers of AI Training Data Market

Rising Demand for Industry-Specific Datasets to Provide Viable Market Output

A key driver in the AI Training Data market is the escalating demand for industry-specific datasets. As businesses across sectors increasingly adopt AI applications, the need for highly specialized and domain-specific training data becomes critical. Industries such as healthcare, finance, and automotive require datasets that reflect the nuances and complexities unique to their domains. This demand fuels the growth of providers offering curated datasets tailored to specific industries, ensuring that AI models are trained with relevant and representative data, leading to enhanced performance and accuracy in diverse applications.

In July 2021, Amazon and Hugging Face, a provider of open-source natural language processing (NLP) technologies, have collaborated. The objective of this partnership was to accelerate the deployment of sophisticated NLP capabilities while making it easier for businesses to use cutting-edge machine-learning models. Following this partnership, Hugging Face will suggest Amazon Web Services as a cloud service provider for its clients.

(Source: about:blank)

Advancements in Data Labelling Technologies to Propel Market Growth

The continuous advancements in data labelling technologies serve as another significant driver for the AI Training Data market. Efficient and accurate labelling is essential for training robust AI models. Innovations in automated and semi-automated labelling tools, leveraging techniques like computer vision and natural language processing, streamline the data annotation process. These technologies not only improve the speed and scalability of dataset preparation but also contribute to the overall quality and consistency of labelled data. The adoption of advanced labelling solutions addresses industry challenges related to data annotation, driving the market forward amidst the increasing demand for high-quality training data.

In June 2021, Scale AI and MIT Media Lab, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology research centre, began working together. To help doctors treat patients more effectively, this cooperation attempted to utilize ML in healthcare.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325854/

Restraint Factors Of AI Training Data Market

Data Privacy and Security Concerns to Restrict Market Growth

A significant restraint in the AI Training Data market is the growing concern over data privacy and security. As the demand for diverse and expansive datasets rises, so does the need for sensitive information. However, the collection and utilization of personal or proprietary data raise ethical and privacy issues. Companies and data providers face challenges in ensuring compliance with regulations and safeguarding against unauthorized access or misuse of sensitive information. Addressing these concerns becomes imperative to gain user trust and navigate the evolving landscape of data protection laws, which, in turn, poses a restraint on the smooth progression of the AI Training Data market.

How did COVID–19 impact the Ai Training Data market?

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a multifaceted impact on the AI Training Data market. While the demand for AI solutions has accelerated across industries, the availability and collection of training data faced challenges. The pandemic disrupted traditional data collection methods, leading to a slowdown in the generation of labeled datasets due to restrictions on physical operations. Simultaneously, the surge in remote work and the increased reliance on AI-driven technologies for various applications fueled the need for diverse and relevant training data. This duali...

Context: Exception handling (EH) bugs stem from incorrect usage of exception handling mechanisms (EHMs) and often incur severe consequences (e.g., system downtime, data loss, and security risk). Tracking EH bugs is particularly relevant for contemporary systems (e.g., cloud- and AI-based systems), in which the software's sophisticated logic is an additional threat to the correct use of the EHM. On top of that, bug reporters seldom can tag EH bugs --- since it may require an encompassing knowledge of the software's EH strategy. Surprisingly, to the best of our knowledge, there is no automated procedure to identify EH bugs from report descriptions.Objective: First, we aim to evaluate the extent to which Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) can be used to reliably label EH bugs using the text fields from bug reports (e.g., summary, description, and comments). Second, we aim to provide a reliably labeled dataset that the community can use in future endeavors. Overall, we expect our work to raise the community's awareness regarding the importance of EH bugs.Method: We manually analyzed 4,516 bug reports from the four main components of Apache’s Hadoop project, out of which we labeled ~20% (943) as EH bugs. We also labeled 2,584 non-EH bugs analyzing their bug-fixing code and creating a dataset composed of 7,100 bug reports. Then, we used word embedding techniques (Bag-of-Words and TF-IDF) to summarize the textual fields of bug reports. Subsequently, we used these embeddings to fit five classes of ML methods and evaluate them on unseen data. We also evaluated a pre-trained transformer-based model using the complete textual fields. We have also evaluated whether considering only EH keywords is enough to achieve high predictive performance.Results: Our results show that using a pre-trained DistilBERT with a linear layer trained with our proposed dataset can reasonably label EH bugs, achieving ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.88. The combination of NLP and ML traditional techniques achieved ROC-AUC scores of up to 0.74 and recall up to 0.56. As a sanity check, we also evaluate methods using embeddings extracted solely from keywords. Considering ROC-AUC as the primary concern, for the majority of ML methods tested, the analysis suggests that keywords alone are not sufficient to characterize reports of EH bugs, although this can change based on other metrics (such as recall and precision) or ML methods (e.g., Random Forest).Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the problem of automatic labeling of EH bugs. Based on our results, we can conclude that the use of ML techniques, specially transformer-base models, sounds promising to automate the task of labeling EH bugs. Overall, we hope (i) that our work will contribute towards raising awareness around EH bugs; and (ii) that our (publicly available) dataset will serve as a benchmarking dataset, paving the way for follow-up works. Additionally, our findings can be used to build tools that help maintainers flesh out EH bugs during the triage process.

Snapshot img

Enterprise Labeling Software Market Size 2024-2028

The enterprise labeling software market size is forecast to increase by USD 133.9 mn at a CAGR of 6.59% between 2023 and 2028.

The market is witnessing significant growth due to several key trends. The adoption of enterprise labeling solutions is increasing as businesses seek to streamline their labeling processes and improve efficiency. Dynamic labeling, which allows for real-time updates to labels, is gaining popularity as it enables companies to quickly respond to changing regulations or product information. The market is experiencing growth as companies leverage data integration and analytics to streamline labeling processes, ensuring greater accuracy, compliance, and operational efficiency. Moreover, stringent government regulations mandating accurate and compliant labeling are driving the need for enterprise labeling software. These factors are expected to fuel market growth In the coming years. The market landscape is constantly evolving, and staying abreast of these trends is essential for businesses looking to remain competitive.

What will be the Size of the Enterprise Labeling Software Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market encompasses solutions designed for creating, managing, and printing labels in various industries. Compliance with regulations and ensuring labeling accuracy are key drivers for this market. Real-time updates and customizable templates enable businesses to maintain consistency and adapt to changing requirements. Integration capabilities with enterprise systems, data management planning, and the printing process are essential for streamlining workflows and improving efficiency. Innovative technology, such as automation and machine learning, enhances labeling quality and speed, providing a competitive edge.
A user-friendly interface and economic conditions influence market demand. Urbanization and the growing need for packaging solutions, branding, and on-premises-based software further expand the market's reach. Overall, the market continues to grow, offering significant benefits to businesses seeking to optimize their labeling processes.

How is this Enterprise Labeling Software Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

The industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Deployment

  On-premise
  Cloud


End-user

  FMCG
  Retail and e-commerce
  Healthcare
  Warehousing and logistics
  Others


Geography

  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan


  North America

    US


  Europe

    Germany


  Middle East and Africa



  South America

By Deployment Insights

The on-premise segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The market is driven by the need for compliance, creation, management, printing, and real-time updates of labels in various industries. Large enterprises require unique labeling solutions to meet diverse industry standards and traceability regulations, ensuring product quality and customer satisfaction. On-premise and cloud-based enterprise labeling software offer agility, scalability, and flexibility, optimizing operations and enhancing resilience and adaptability. Compliance management, seamless collaboration, contactless processes, safety measures, and predictive analytics are key features. Driving factors include digitalization, automation, and evolving challenges in logistics and e-commerce. However, varying industry standards, implementation costs, legacy systems, and integration challenges pose restraining factors. Enterprise labeling software solutions offer customizable templates, integration capabilities, and language support, catering to the economic condition, urbanization, and packaging solutions.

Brands prioritize a data-driven approach and regulatory requirements In their labeling strategy. The market is expected to grow, with key players catering to enterprise sizes and time to market.

Get a glance at the Enterprise Labeling Software Industry report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

The On-premise segment was valued at USD 163.80 mn in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Analysis

APAC is estimated to contribute 41% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.

Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

For more insights on the market share of various regions, Request Free Sample

The market in APAC is projected to experience significant growth due to the increasing number of end-users in sectors such as food and beverage, personal care products, and pharmaceuticals.

In 2020, more than 80 percent of the revenue of data annotation market were generated from English speaking regions, including the United States and the United Kingdom. The estimated data annotation market size serviced by India was around 250 million U.S. dollars in the same year. Data annotation is the process of labeling data in text, video, image, and other digital file formats.

Traffic camera images from the New York State Department of Transportation (511ny.org) are used to create a hand-labeled dataset of images classified into to one of six road surface conditions: 1) severe snow, 2) snow, 3) wet, 4) dry, 5) poor visibility, or 6) obstructed. Six labelers (authors Sutter, Wirz, Przybylo, Cains, Radford, and Evans) went through a series of four labeling trials where reliability across all six labelers were assessed using the Krippendorff’s alpha (KA) metric (Krippendorff, 2007). The online tool by Dr. Freelon (Freelon, 2013; Freelon, 2010) was used to calculate reliability metrics after each trial, and the group achieved inter-coder reliability with KA of 0.888 on the 4th trial. This process is known as quantitative content analysis, and three pieces of data used in this process are shared, including: 1) a PDF of the codebook which serves as a set of rules for labeling images, 2) images from each of the four labeling trials, including the use of New York State Mesonet weather observation data (Brotzge et al., 2020), and 3) an Excel spreadsheet including the calculated inter-coder reliability metrics and other summaries used to asses reliability after each trial.

The broader purpose of this work is that the six human labelers, after achieving inter-coder reliability, can then label large sets of images independently, each contributing to the creation of larger labeled dataset used for training supervised machine learning models to predict road surface conditions from camera images. The xCITE lab (xCITE, 2023) is used to store camera images from 511ny.org, and the lab provides computing resources for training machine learning models.

Remote cameras (“trail cameras”) are a popular tool for non-invasive, continuous wildlife monitoring, and as they become more prevalent in wildlife research, machine learning (ML) is increasingly used to automate or accelerate the labor-intensive process of labelling (i.e., tagging) photos. Human-machine hybrid tagging approaches have been shown to greatly increase tagging efficiency (i.e., time to tag a single image). However, those potential increases hinge on the extent to which an ML model makes correct vs. incorrect predictions. We performed an experiment using a ML model that produces bounding boxes around animals, people, and vehicles in remote camera imagery (MegaDetector), to consider the impact of a ML model’s performance on its ability to accelerate human labeling. Six participants tagged trail camera images collected from 12 sites in Vermont and Maine, USA (January-September 2022) using three tagging methods (one with ML bounding box assistance and two without assistance).

1. Overview This dataset is a collection of 6,000+ images of mixed race human face with various expressions & emotions that are ready to use for optimizing the accuracy of computer vision models. All of the contents is sourced from PIXTA's stock library of 100M+ Asian-featured images and videos. PIXTA is the largest platform of visual materials in the Asia Pacific region offering fully-managed services, high quality contents and data, and powerful tools for businesses & organisations to enable their creative and machine learning projects.

2. The data set This dataset contains 6,000+ images of face emotion. Each data set is supported by both AI and human review process to ensure labelling consistency and accuracy. Contact us for more custom datasets.

3. About PIXTA PIXTASTOCK is the largest Asian-featured stock platform providing data, contents, tools and services since 2005. PIXTA experiences 15 years of integrating advanced AI technology in managing, curating, processing over 100M visual materials and serving global leading brands for their creative and data demands. Visit us at https://www.pixta.ai/ or contact via our email contact@pixta.ai."

The open dataset, software, and other files accompanying the manuscript "An Open Combinatorial Diffraction Dataset Including Consensus Human and Machine Learning Labels with Quantified Uncertainty for Training New Machine Learning Models," submitted for publication to Integrated Materials and Manufacturing Innovations. Machine learning and autonomy are increasingly prevalent in materials science, but existing models are often trained or tuned using idealized data as absolute ground truths. In actual materials science, "ground truth" is often a matter of interpretation and is more readily determined by consensus. Here we present the data, software, and other files for a study using as-obtained diffraction data as a test case for evaluating the performance of machine learning models in the presence of differing expert opinions. We demonstrate that experts with similar backgrounds can disagree greatly even for something as intuitive as using diffraction to identify the start and end of a phase transformation. We then use a logarithmic likelihood method to evaluate the performance of machine learning models in relation to the consensus expert labels and their variance. We further illustrate this method's efficacy in ranking a number of state-of-the-art phase mapping algorithms. We propose a materials data challenge centered around the problem of evaluating models based on consensus with uncertainty. The data, labels, and code used in this study are all available online at data.gov, and the interested reader is encouraged to replicate and improve the existing models or to propose alternative methods for evaluating algorithmic performance.

In 2020, the estimated data annotation market size serviced by India was around 250 million U.S. dollars. It was a huge increase of more than 300 percent in comparison to 2018. Data annotation is the process of labeling data in text, video, image, and other digital file formats.

1. Overview This dataset is a collection of high view traffic images in multiple scenes, backgrounds and lighting conditions that are ready to use for optimizing the accuracy of computer vision models. All of the contents is sourced from PIXTA's stock library of 100M+ Asian-featured images and videos. PIXTA is the largest platform of visual materials in the Asia Pacific region offering fully-managed services, high quality contents and data, and powerful tools for businesses & organisations to enable their creative and machine learning projects.

2. Use case This dataset is used for AI solutions training & testing in various cases: Traffic monitoring, Traffic camera system, Vehicle flow estimation,... Each data set is supported by both AI and human review process to ensure labelling consistency and accuracy. Contact us for more custom datasets.

3. About PIXTA PIXTASTOCK is the largest Asian-featured stock platform providing data, contents, tools and services since 2005. PIXTA experiences 15 years of integrating advanced AI technology in managing, curating, processing over 100M visual materials and serving global leading brands for their creative and data demands. Visit us at https://www.pixta.ai/ for more details.