Image Data Labeling Service Market Outlook

The global image data labeling service market size was valued at approximately USD 1.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 6.1 billion by 2032, exhibiting a robust CAGR of 17.1% during the forecast period. The exponential growth of this market is driven by the increasing demand for high-quality labeled data for machine learning and artificial intelligence applications across various industries.

One of the primary growth factors of the image data labeling service market is the surge in the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies across multiple sectors. Organizations are increasingly relying on AI and ML to enhance operational efficiency, improve customer experience, and gain competitive advantages. As a result, there is a rising need for accurately labeled data to train these AI and ML models, driving the demand for image data labeling services. Furthermore, advancements in computer vision technology have expanded the scope of image data labeling, making it essential for applications such as autonomous vehicles, facial recognition, and medical imaging.

Another significant factor contributing to market growth is the proliferation of big data. The massive volume of data generated from various sources, including social media, surveillance cameras, and IoT devices, necessitates the need for effective data labeling solutions. Companies are leveraging image data labeling services to manage and analyze these vast datasets efficiently. Additionally, the growing focus on personalized customer experiences in sectors like retail and e-commerce is fueling the demand for labeled data, which helps in understanding customer preferences and behaviors.

Investment in research and development (R&D) activities by key players in the market is also a crucial growth driver. Companies are continuously innovating and developing new techniques to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of image data labeling processes. These advancements not only improve the quality of labeled data but also reduce the time and cost associated with manual labeling. The integration of AI and machine learning algorithms in the labeling process is further boosting the market growth by automating repetitive tasks and minimizing human errors.

From a regional perspective, North America holds the largest market share due to early adoption of advanced technologies and the presence of major AI and ML companies. The region is expected to maintain its dominance during the forecast period, driven by continuous technological advancements and substantial investments in AI research. Asia Pacific is anticipated to witness the highest growth rate due to the rising adoption of AI technologies in countries like China, Japan, and India. The increasing focus on digital transformation and government initiatives to promote AI adoption are significant factors contributing to the regional market growth.

Type Analysis

The image data labeling service market is segmented into three primary types: manual labeling, semi-automatic labeling, and automatic labeling. Manual labeling, which involves human annotators tagging images, is essential for ensuring high accuracy, especially in complex tasks. Despite being time-consuming and labor-intensive, manual labeling is widely used in applications where nuanced understanding and precision are paramount. This segment continues to hold a significant market share due to the reliability it offers. However, the cost and time constraints associated with manual labeling are driving the growth of more advanced labeling techniques.

Semi-automatic labeling combines human intervention with automated processes, providing a balance between accuracy and efficiency. In this approach, algorithms perform initial labeling, and human annotators refine and validate the results. This method significantly reduces the time required for data labeling while maintaining high accuracy levels. The semi-automatic labeling segment is gaining traction as it offers a scalable and cost-effective solution, particularly beneficial for industries dealing with large volumes of data, such as retail and IT.

Automatic labeling, driven by AI and machine learning algorithms, represents the most advanced segment of the market. This approach leverages sophisticated models to autonomously label image data with minimal human intervention. The continuous improvement in AI algorithms, along with the availability of large datasets for training, has enhanced the accuracy and reliability of automatic lab

Global Data Collection and Labeling Market size & share value expected to touch USD 30.49 billion by 2032, to grow at a CAGR of 28.6% during the forecast period.

In House Data Labeling Market Outlook

The global in-house data labeling market size is projected to grow significantly, reaching approximately USD 10 billion by 2023 and forecasted to expand to nearly USD 25 billion by 2032, reflecting a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11%. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for high-quality labeled data required for training machine learning models and artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The advent of advanced AI and machine learning technologies has made precise data labeling more crucial than ever, propelling the market forward.

A major growth factor for the in-house data labeling market is the exponential increase in the volume of data generated across various industries. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the importance of data-driven decision-making, which necessitates accurately labeled datasets to train machine learning models. The proliferation of IoT devices, social media platforms, and digital transactions has contributed to this data surge, creating a pressing need for meticulous data labeling processes. As companies strive to harness the full potential of their data, the demand for in-house data labeling solutions is expected to rise.

Another significant driver is the growing adoption of AI and machine learning across diverse sectors such as healthcare, automotive, and retail. AI applications, ranging from autonomous vehicles to personalized marketing strategies, rely heavily on high-quality labeled data for training purposes. In-house data labeling ensures the accuracy and relevance of the labeled data, giving organizations greater control over the quality and security of their datasets. This trend is anticipated to fuel the market's growth as more industries integrate AI technologies into their operations.

Moreover, the increasing focus on data privacy and security is propelling the growth of the in-house data labeling market. Organizations are becoming increasingly wary of outsourcing data labeling tasks to third-party vendors due to concerns over data breaches and confidentiality. In-house data labeling allows companies to maintain stringent control over their data, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and safeguarding sensitive information. This heightened emphasis on data security is expected to drive the adoption of in-house data labeling solutions.

Regionally, North America is poised to dominate the in-house data labeling market, attributed to the region's advanced technological infrastructure and the early adoption of AI and machine learning technologies. The presence of key market players and a strong focus on research and development further bolster North America's leading position. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by the rapid digitization, increasing investments in AI technologies, and the burgeoning e-commerce sector in countries like China and India. Europe and Latin America are also anticipated to contribute significantly to the market's growth, with a steady increase in AI adoption across various industries.

Data Type Analysis

The in-house data labeling market can be segmented by data type into text, image, video, and audio. Each data type requires specific labeling techniques and presents unique challenges and opportunities. Text data labeling involves annotating text files with metadata, tags, and labels necessary for natural language processing (NLP) tasks. The rise of conversational AI, chatbots, and sentiment analysis applications has surged the demand for accurately labeled text data. Companies focusing on NLP projects are investing heavily in in-house text data labeling to ensure the precision and context of the labeled data, which is crucial for training effective NLP models.

Image data labeling, on the other hand, is pivotal for various AI applications, including facial recognition, object detection, and medical imaging. In-house image data labeling allows organizations to maintain high standards of accuracy and confidentiality, particularly in sensitive sectors like healthcare. With the growing emphasis on automated diagnostic tools and smart surveillance systems, the demand for meticulously labeled image data is anticipated to grow exponentially. The control over labeling quality and data security provided by in-house processes makes it a preferred choice for companies dealing

As per Cognitive Market Research's latest published report, the Global Data Collection and Labeling market size was USD 2.41 Billion in 2022 and it is forecasted to reach USD 18.60 Billion by 2030. Data Collection and Labeling Industry's Compound Annual Growth Rate will be 29.1% from 2023 to 2030. What are the key driving factors for the Data Collection and Labeling Market?

As machine learning and artificial intelligence become more prevalent, the demand for high-quality training data is increasing. This is because algorithms need accurate and well-labeled data to learn and make accurate predictions. This factor is accelerating the growth of the Data Collection and Labeling Market. Moreover, the advancement in technology is one of the major factors contributing to the market growth. Technological advancements have made data collection and labeling more efficient and accurate. For example, computer vision algorithms can now label images and videos automatically, reducing the need for manual labeling. Similarly, the growing need for data in various industries and data collection and labeling is critical in industries such as healthcare, finance, retail, and automotive. As these industries become more data-driven, the need for accurate and well-labeled data is increasing, which is driving the market’s growth.

Growing use of AI and machine learning is creating demand for high-quality labelled data sets across sectors.

High-quality labelled data sets across sectors are needed due to growing use of AI and machine learning. More companies are now seeking to train AI models to do things like autonomous cars, medical diagnosis or natural language processing, and data annotation is getting in the way. Automated and AI-based data labelling technologies have streamlined the process, which in turn has minimized manual labelling cost and time. Concurrently, the accelerated expansion of e-commerce, social media, and customer analytics industries is also fueling an unquenchable thirst for copious amounts of labelled data. Cloud-based platforms enabled organizations to embrace scalable solutions for real-time data labelling, which will support faster market growth.

Key Restraint of Market.

Data privacy laws, high expense, and inefficient manual labelling can restraint the market.

While it is slowly being adopted, we are inevitably going to encounter non-trivial issues with data collection, data labelling, data privacy, data security, and compliance. Laws such as GDPR and CCPA have a genuine effect on what you can do with user data, and the amount of usable high-quality datasets available is few and far between. While manual tagging has proven to be time-consuming and error-filled, reducing accuracy and scalability. High costs of skilled annotators and advanced AI-powered tagging technologies may be unaffordable for small-to-mid-sized entities. Bias data and its impact on the AI decision-making process is another ethical problem that significantly holds back the digital workforce, which compels entities to follow transparent data labelling practices properly, according to the information they want.

Key Opportunity of Market.

AI-powered automation and self-supervised learning improve scalability and precision in data labeling.

The increasing penetration of AI-powered automation in data labeling, along with the vast scale, provides profitable growth opportunities in the market. The latency will decrease, and the costs will be less due to the integration of AI-powered annotation tools with a human-in-the-loop model that offers a trade-off between the accuracy and costs. Self-supervised and semi-supervised learning expands the potential of an AI model to tag data with minimal or no human intervention but offers robust scalability. New uses in healthcare, robotics, and autonomous systems open up new use cases by the day. Additionally, increased growth in edge computing and IoT devices organically generates large amounts of unstructured data, providing a pathway for AI-based data-labeling solutions to help improve real-time processing and analysis. What is Data Collection and Labeling?

Data collection and labeling is the process of gathering and organizing data and adding metadata to it for better analysis and understanding. This process is critical in machine learning and artificial intelligence, as it provides the found...

Our dataset is composed of information about 7,769 posts on Instagram. The data collection was done over a two-week period in July 2017 using an InstaLooter API. We searched for posts mentioning 62 internationally renowned fashion brand names as hashtag.

The dataset includes responses from approximately 550 participants to survey questions about trust in images labeled with AI-related tags, compared to other images found online. The questions also explore how the type of label influences their trust.

Our fashion dataset is composed of information about 24,752 posts by 13,350 people on Instagram. The data collection was done over a month period in January, 2015. We searched for posts mentioning 48 internationally renowned fashion brand names as hashtag. Our data contain information about hashtags as well as image features based on deep learning (Convolutional Neural Network or CNN). The list of learned features include selfies, body snaps, marketing shots, non-fashion, faces, logo, etc. Please refer to our paper for the full description of how we built our deep learning model.

Data Labeling Software Market Outlook

In 2023, the global market size for data labeling software was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion and is projected to reach USD 6.5 billion by 2032, with a CAGR of 21% during the forecast period. The primary growth factor driving this market is the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies across various industry verticals, necessitating high-quality labeled data for model training and validation.

The surge in AI and ML applications is a significant growth driver for the data labeling software market. As businesses increasingly harness these advanced technologies to gain insights, optimize operations, and innovate products and services, the demand for accurately labeled data has skyrocketed. This trend is particularly pronounced in sectors such as healthcare, automotive, and finance, where AI and ML applications are critical for advancements like predictive analytics, autonomous driving, and fraud detection. The growing reliance on AI and ML is propelling the market forward, as labeled data forms the backbone of effective AI model development.

Another crucial growth factor is the proliferation of big data. With the explosion of data generated from various sources, including social media, IoT devices, and enterprise systems, organizations are seeking efficient ways to manage and utilize this vast amount of information. Data labeling software enables companies to systematically organize and annotate large datasets, making them usable for AI and ML applications. The ability to handle diverse data types, including text, images, and audio, further amplifies the demand for these solutions, facilitating more comprehensive data analysis and better decision-making.

The increasing emphasis on data privacy and security is also driving the growth of the data labeling software market. With stringent regulations such as GDPR and CCPA coming into play, companies are under pressure to ensure that their data handling practices comply with legal standards. Data labeling software helps in anonymizing and protecting sensitive information during the labeling process, thus providing a layer of security and compliance. This has become particularly important as data breaches and cyber threats continue to rise, making secure data management a top priority for organizations worldwide.

Regionally, North America holds a significant share of the data labeling software market due to early adoption of AI and ML technologies, substantial investments in tech startups, and advanced IT infrastructure. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period. This growth is driven by the rapid digital transformation in countries like China and India, increasing investments in AI research, and the expansion of IT services. Europe and Latin America also present substantial growth opportunities, supported by technological advancements and increasing regulatory compliance needs.

Component Analysis

The data labeling software market can be segmented by component into software and services. The software segment encompasses various platforms and tools designed to label data efficiently. These software solutions offer features such as automation, integration with other AI tools, and scalability, which are critical for handling large datasets. The growing demand for automated data labeling solutions is a significant trend in this segment, driven by the need for faster and more accurate data annotation processes.

In contrast, the services segment includes human-in-the-loop solutions, consulting, and managed services. These services are essential for ensuring the quality and accuracy of labeled data, especially for complex tasks that require human judgment. Companies often turn to service providers for their expertise in specific domains, such as healthcare or automotive, where domain knowledge is crucial for effective data labeling. The services segment is also seeing growth due to the increasing need for customized solutions tailored to specific business requirements.

Moreover, hybrid approaches that combine software and human expertise are gaining traction. These solutions leverage the scalability and speed of automated software while incorporating human oversight for quality assurance. This combination is particularly useful in scenarios where data quality is paramount, such as in medical imaging or autonomous vehicle training. The hybrid model is expected to grow as companies seek to balance efficiency with accuracy in their

The increasing multimodality (e.g., images, videos, links) of social media data presents opportunities and challenges. But text-as-data methods continue to dominate as modes of classification, as multimodal social media data are costly to collect and label. Researchers who face a budget constraint may need to make informed decisions regarding whether to collect and label only the textual content of social media data, or their full multimodal content. In this article, we develop five measures and an experimental framework to assist with these decisions. We propose five performance metrics to measure the costs and benefits of multimodal labeling: average time per post, average time per valid response, valid response rate, inter-coder agreement, and classifier's predictive power. To estimate these measures, we introduce an experimental framework to evaluate coders' performance under text-only and multimodal labeling conditions. We illustrate the method with a tweet labeling experiment.

The prevalence of bias in the news media has become a critical issue, affecting public perception on a range of important topics such as political views, health, insurance, resource distributions, religion, race, age, gender, occupation, and climate change. The media has a moral responsibility to ensure accurate information dissemination and to increase awareness about important issues and the potential risks associated with them. This highlights the need for a solution that can help mitigate against the spread of false or misleading information and restore public trust in the media.Data description: This is a dataset for news media bias covering different dimensions of the biases: political, hate speech, political, toxicity, sexism, ageism, gender identity, gender discrimination, race/ethnicity, climate change, occupation, spirituality, which makes it a unique contribution. The dataset used for this project does not contain any personally identifiable information (PII).The data structure is tabulated as follows:Text: The main content.Dimension: Descriptive category of the text.Biased_Words: A compilation of words regarded as biased.Aspect: Specific sub-topic within the main content.Label: Indicates the presence (True) or absence (False) of bias. The label is ternary - highly biased, slightly biased and neutralToxicity: Indicates the presence (True) or absence (False) of bias.Identity_mention: Mention of any identity based on words match.Annotation SchemeThe labels and annotations in the dataset are generated through a system of Active Learning, cycling through:Manual LabelingSemi-Supervised LearningHuman VerificationThe scheme comprises:Bias Label: Specifies the degree of bias (e.g., no bias, mild, or strong).Words/Phrases Level Biases: Pinpoints specific biased terms or phrases.Subjective Bias (Aspect): Highlights biases pertinent to content dimensions.Due to the nuances of semantic match algorithms, certain labels such as 'identity' and 'aspect' may appear distinctively different.List of datasets used : We curated different news categories like Climate crisis news summaries , occupational, spiritual/faith/ general using RSS to capture different dimensions of the news media biases. The annotation is performed using active learning to label the sentence (either neural/ slightly biased/ highly biased) and to pick biased words from the news.We also utilize publicly available data from the following links. Our Attribution to others.MBIC (media bias): Spinde, Timo, Lada Rudnitckaia, Kanishka Sinha, Felix Hamborg, Bela Gipp, and Karsten Donnay. "MBIC--A Media Bias Annotation Dataset Including Annotator Characteristics." arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11910 (2021). https://zenodo.org/records/4474336Hyperpartisan news: Kiesel, Johannes, Maria Mestre, Rishabh Shukla, Emmanuel Vincent, Payam Adineh, David Corney, Benno Stein, and Martin Potthast. "Semeval-2019 task 4: Hyperpartisan news detection." In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 829-839. 2019. https://huggingface.co/datasets/hyperpartisan_news_detectionToxic comment classification: Adams, C.J., Jeffrey Sorensen, Julia Elliott, Lucas Dixon, Mark McDonald, Nithum, and Will Cukierski. 2017. "Toxic Comment Classification Challenge." Kaggle. https://kaggle.com/competitions/jigsaw-toxic-comment-classification-challenge.Jigsaw Unintended Bias: Adams, C.J., Daniel Borkan, Inversion, Jeffrey Sorensen, Lucas Dixon, Lucy Vasserman, and Nithum. 2019. "Jigsaw Unintended Bias in Toxicity Classification." Kaggle. https://kaggle.com/competitions/jigsaw-unintended-bias-in-toxicity-classification.Age Bias : Díaz, Mark, Isaac Johnson, Amanda Lazar, Anne Marie Piper, and Darren Gergle. "Addressing age-related bias in sentiment analysis." In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, pp. 1-14. 2018. Age Bias Training and Testing Data - Age Bias and Sentiment Analysis Dataverse (harvard.edu)Multi-dimensional news Ukraine: Färber, Michael, Victoria Burkard, Adam Jatowt, and Sora Lim. "A multidimensional dataset based on crowdsourcing for analyzing and detecting news bias." In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 3007-3014. 2020. https://zenodo.org/records/3885351#.ZF0KoxHMLtVSocial biases: Sap, Maarten, Saadia Gabriel, Lianhui Qin, Dan Jurafsky, Noah A. Smith, and Yejin Choi. "Social bias frames: Reasoning about social and power implications of language." arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03891 (2019). https://maartensap.com/social-bias-frames/Goal of this dataset :We want to offer open and free access to dataset, ensuring a wide reach to researchers and AI practitioners across the world. The dataset should be user-friendly to use and uploading and accessing data should be straightforward, to facilitate usage.If you use this dataset, please cite us.Navigating News Narratives: A Media Bias Analysis Dataset © 2023 by Shaina Raza, Vector Institute is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0

Attachments include replication data, replication code, and a short document explaining the dataset with variable descriptions for the paper: "An Investigation of Social Media Labeling Decisions Preceding the 2020 U.S. Election" by Samantha Bradshaw, Shelby Grossman, and Miles McCain.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Ai Training Data market size is USD 1865.2 million in 2023 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23.50% from 2023 to 2030.

The demand for Ai Training Data is rising due to the rising demand for labelled data and diversification of AI applications.
Demand for Image/Video remains higher in the Ai Training Data market.
The Healthcare category held the highest Ai Training Data market revenue share in 2023.
North American Ai Training Data will continue to lead, whereas the Asia-Pacific Ai Training Data market will experience the most substantial growth until 2030.

Market Dynamics of AI Training Data Market

Key Drivers of AI Training Data Market

Rising Demand for Industry-Specific Datasets to Provide Viable Market Output

A key driver in the AI Training Data market is the escalating demand for industry-specific datasets. As businesses across sectors increasingly adopt AI applications, the need for highly specialized and domain-specific training data becomes critical. Industries such as healthcare, finance, and automotive require datasets that reflect the nuances and complexities unique to their domains. This demand fuels the growth of providers offering curated datasets tailored to specific industries, ensuring that AI models are trained with relevant and representative data, leading to enhanced performance and accuracy in diverse applications.

In July 2021, Amazon and Hugging Face, a provider of open-source natural language processing (NLP) technologies, have collaborated. The objective of this partnership was to accelerate the deployment of sophisticated NLP capabilities while making it easier for businesses to use cutting-edge machine-learning models. Following this partnership, Hugging Face will suggest Amazon Web Services as a cloud service provider for its clients.

(Source: about:blank)

Advancements in Data Labelling Technologies to Propel Market Growth

The continuous advancements in data labelling technologies serve as another significant driver for the AI Training Data market. Efficient and accurate labelling is essential for training robust AI models. Innovations in automated and semi-automated labelling tools, leveraging techniques like computer vision and natural language processing, streamline the data annotation process. These technologies not only improve the speed and scalability of dataset preparation but also contribute to the overall quality and consistency of labelled data. The adoption of advanced labelling solutions addresses industry challenges related to data annotation, driving the market forward amidst the increasing demand for high-quality training data.

In June 2021, Scale AI and MIT Media Lab, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology research centre, began working together. To help doctors treat patients more effectively, this cooperation attempted to utilize ML in healthcare.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325854/

Restraint Factors Of AI Training Data Market

Data Privacy and Security Concerns to Restrict Market Growth

A significant restraint in the AI Training Data market is the growing concern over data privacy and security. As the demand for diverse and expansive datasets rises, so does the need for sensitive information. However, the collection and utilization of personal or proprietary data raise ethical and privacy issues. Companies and data providers face challenges in ensuring compliance with regulations and safeguarding against unauthorized access or misuse of sensitive information. Addressing these concerns becomes imperative to gain user trust and navigate the evolving landscape of data protection laws, which, in turn, poses a restraint on the smooth progression of the AI Training Data market.

How did COVID–19 impact the Ai Training Data market?

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a multifaceted impact on the AI Training Data market. While the demand for AI solutions has accelerated across industries, the availability and collection of training data faced challenges. The pandemic disrupted traditional data collection methods, leading to a slowdown in the generation of labeled datasets due to restrictions on physical operations. Simultaneously, the surge in remote work and the increased reliance on AI-driven technologies for various applications fueled the need for diverse and relevant training data. This duali...

These guidelines are intended to help you comply with federal laws and to ensure that universally recognized principles, such as patient safety and accessibility, are respected when distributing information through an electronic platform linked to a prescription drug label.

The M-pox dataset is from May 1st to Sep 5th, 2022.

These guidelines are intended to help you comply with federal laws and to ensure that universally recognized principles, such as patient safety and accessibility, are respected when distributing information through an electronic platform linked to a prescription drug label.

Outsourced Data Labeling Market Outlook

The global outsourced data labeling market size was valued at approximately USD 1.6 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 10.2 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22.3% during the forecast period. This significant growth is driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies across various industries, which has necessitated the need for high-quality annotated data to train these advanced systems.

One of the primary growth factors for the outsourced data labeling market is the burgeoning demand for AI-driven solutions in industries such as healthcare, automotive, and retail. As companies strive to leverage AI for enhancing operational efficiency, customer experience, and decision-making processes, the need for accurately labeled data sets has become paramount. This has led to a surge in demand for outsourced data labeling services, as organizations often lack the resources to manage data annotation internally.

Additionally, the proliferation of big data is another crucial factor propelling the market. The exponential increase in data generation from various sources, including social media, IoT devices, and digital transactions, has created a massive repository of data that needs to be processed and labeled for meaningful insights. Outsourced data labeling provides a viable solution for handling large volumes of data efficiently, enabling companies to focus on their core competencies while leveraging expert services for data annotation.

The rise of autonomous vehicles and advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) is also a significant contributor to the market’s growth. The automotive sector is heavily reliant on precise data labeling to train AI models for object detection, lane recognition, and other critical functionalities. Outsourcing these tasks to specialized vendors ensures high-quality annotations, speeds up the development process, and reduces the overall time-to-market for new technologies.

Regionally, North America is expected to hold a significant share of the outsourced data labeling market. This can be attributed to the presence of numerous tech giants and startups focusing on AI and machine learning in the region. Furthermore, the robust infrastructure, government support, and availability of skilled professionals make North America a favorable market for outsourced data labeling services. Asia Pacific is also anticipated to witness substantial growth due to the increasing adoption of AI technologies in countries like China, Japan, and India.

Data Type Analysis

The outsourced data labeling market is segmented by data type into text, image, video, and audio. Text data labeling is one of the most prevalent segments due to its wide application across various industries. Annotated text is essential for natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as sentiment analysis, chatbots, and machine translation. The increasing adoption of AI-driven customer service applications and sentiment analysis tools is driving the demand for outsourced text data labeling services.

Image data labeling is another critical segment, primarily driven by the requirements of computer vision applications. This includes facial recognition, object detection, and medical image analysis. The healthcare sector significantly benefits from image annotation as it aids in the diagnosis and treatment planning by providing accurately labeled medical images. As AI continues to revolutionize the healthcare industry, the demand for image data labeling is expected to rise substantially.

Video data labeling is gaining traction due to its application in autonomous vehicles, security surveillance, and entertainment. In the automotive industry, video annotation is crucial for developing self-driving vehicles, where labeled video data is used to train models for detecting obstacles, recognizing traffic signs, and predicting pedestrian movements. The growing investments in autonomous vehicle technology are expected to drive the demand for video data labeling services.

Audio data labeling is essential for speech recognition and voice-controlled applications. With the increasing popularity of virtual assistants like Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple's Siri, the need for accurate

Global Data Collection Labeling market was valued at USD 2.23 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 8.23 Billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 24.12% during the forecast period.

445 Global import shipment records of Media Labels with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

Dataset Introduction TFH_Annotated_Dataset is an annotated patent dataset pertaining to thin film head technology in hard-disk. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second labeled patent dataset public available in technology management domain that annotates both entities and the semantic relations between entities, the first one is 1.

The well-crafted information schema used for patent annotation contains 17 types of entities and 15 types of semantic relations as shown below.

Table 1 The specification of entity types

Table 2 The specification of relation types

There are 1010 patent abstracts with 3,986 sentences in this corpus . We use a web-based annotation tool named Brat2 for data labeling, and the annotated data is saved in '.ann' format. The benefit of 'ann' is that you can display and manipulate the annotated data once the TFH_Annotated_Dataset.zip is unzipped under corresponding repository of Brat.

TFH_Annotated_Dataset contains 22,833 entity mentions and 17,412 semantic relation mentions. With TFH_Annotated_Dataset, we run two tasks of information extraction including named entity recognition with BiLSTM-CRF[3] and semantic relation extractionand with BiGRU-2ATTENTION[4]. For improving semantic representation of patent language, the word embeddings are trained with the abstract of 46,302 patents regarding magnetic head in hard disk drive, which turn out to improve the performance of named entity recognition by 0.3% and semantic relation extraction by about 2% in weighted average F1, compared to GloVe and the patent word embedding provided by Risch et al[5].

For named entity recognition, the weighted-average precision, recall, F1-value of BiLSTM-CRF on entity-level for the test set are 78.5%, 78.0%, and 78.2%, respectively. Although such performance is acceptable, it is still lower than its performance on general-purpose dataset by more than 10% in F1-value. The main reason is the limited amount of labeled dataset.

The precision, recall, and F1-value for each type of entity is shown in Fig. 4. As to relation extraction, the weighted-average precision, recall, F1-value of BiGRU-2ATTENTION for the test set are 89.7%, 87.9%, and 88.6% with no_edge relations, and 32.3%, 41.5%, 36.3% without no_edge relations.

Academic citing Chen, L., Xu, S*., Zhu, L. et al. A deep learning based method for extracting semantic information from patent documents. Scientometrics 125, 289–312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03634-y

Paper link https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-020-03634-y

REFERENCE 1 Pérez-Pérez, M., Pérez-Rodríguez, G., Vazquez, M., Fdez-Riverola, F., Oyarzabal, J., Oyarzabal, J., Valencia,A., Lourenço, A., & Krallinger, M. (2017). Evaluation of chemical and gene/protein entity recognition systems at BioCreative V.5: The CEMP and GPRO patents tracks. In Proceedings of the Bio-Creative V.5 challenge evaluation workshop, pp. 11–18.

2 Stenetorp, P., Pyysalo, S., Topić, G., Ohta, T., Ananiadou, S., & Tsujii, J. I. (2012). BRAT: a web-based tool for NLP-assisted text annotation. In Proceedings of the Demonstrations at the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 102-107)

[3] Huang, Z., Xu, W., &Yu, K. (2015). Bidirectional LSTM-CRF models for sequence tagging. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.01991

[4] Han,X., Gao,T., Yao,Y., Ye,D., Liu,Z., Sun, M.(2019). OpenNRE: An Open and Extensible Toolkit for Neural Relation Extraction. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1301.3781

[5] Risch, J., & Krestel, R. (2019). Domain-specific word embeddings for patent classification. Data Technologies and Applications, 53(1), 108–122.

This guidance document describes Health Canada’s expectations for distributing information about a prescription drug product using an electronic platform linked to that product’s label.