This publication provides all the information required to understand the PISA 2003 educational performance database and perform analyses in accordance with the complex methodologies used to collect and process the data. It enables researchers to both reproduce the initial results and to undertake further analyses. The publication includes introductory chapters explaining the statistical theories and concepts required to analyse the PISA data, including full chapters on how to apply replicate weights and undertake analyses using plausible values; worked examples providing full syntax in SAS®; and a comprehensive description of the OECD PISA 2003 international database. The PISA 2003 database includes micro-level data on student educational performance for 41 countries collected in 2003, together with students’ responses to the PISA 2003 questionnaires and the test questions. A similar manual is available for SPSS users.

This formatted dataset (AnalysisDatabaseGBD) originates from raw data files from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD2017) affiliated with the University of Washington. We are volunteer collaborators with IHME and not employed by IHME or the University of Washington.

The population weighted GBD2017 data are on male and female cohorts ages 15-69 years including noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), body mass index (BMI), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and other health outcomes and associated dietary, metabolic, and other risk factors. The purpose of creating this population-weighted, formatted database is to explore the univariate and multiple regression correlations of health outcomes with risk factors. Our research hypothesis is that we can successfully model NCDs, BMI, CVD, and other health outcomes with their attributable risks.

These Global Burden of disease data relate to the preprint: The EAT-Lancet Commission Planetary Health Diet compared with Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation Global Burden of Disease Ecological Data Analysis. The data include the following: 1. Analysis database of population weighted GBD2017 data that includes over 40 health risk factors, noncommunicable disease deaths/100k/year of male and female cohorts ages 15-69 years from 195 countries (the primary outcome variable that includes over 100 types of noncommunicable diseases) and over 20 individual noncommunicable diseases (e.g., ischemic heart disease, colon cancer, etc). 2. A text file to import the analysis database into SAS 3. The SAS code to format the analysis database to be used for analytics 4. SAS code for deriving Tables 1, 2, 3 and Supplementary Tables 5 and 6 5. SAS code for deriving the multiple regression formula in Table 4. 6. SAS code for deriving the multiple regression formula in Table 5 7. SAS code for deriving the multiple regression formula in Supplementary Table 7
8. SAS code for deriving the multiple regression formula in Supplementary Table 8 9. The Excel files that accompanied the above SAS code to produce the tables

For questions, please email davidkcundiff@gmail.com. Thanks.

The OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) surveys collected data on students’ performance in reading, mathematics and science, as well as contextual information on students’ background, home characteristics and school factors which could influence performance. This publication includes detailed information on how to analyse the PISA data, enabling researchers to both reproduce the initial results and to undertake further analyses. In addition to the inclusion of the necessary techniques, the manual also includes a detailed account of the PISA 2006 database. It also includes worked examples providing full syntax in SAS

Exercise data set for the SAS book by Uehlinger. Sample of individual variables and cases from the data set of ZA Study 0757 (political ideology).

Topics: most important political problems of the country; political interest; party inclination; beha

Description of the experiment setting: location, influential climatic conditions, controlled conditions (e.g. temperature, light cycle) In 1986, the Congress enacted Public Laws 99-500 and 99-591, requiring a biennial report on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). In response to these requirements, FNS developed a prototype system that allowed for the routine acquisition of information on WIC participants from WIC State Agencies. Since 1992, State Agencies have provided electronic copies of these data to FNS on a biennial basis. FNS and the National WIC Association (formerly National Association of WIC Directors) agreed on a set of data elements for the transfer of information. In addition, FNS established a minimum standard dataset for reporting participation data. For each biennial reporting cycle, each State Agency is required to submit a participant-level dataset containing standardized information on persons enrolled at local agencies for the reference month of April. The 2016 Participant and Program Characteristics (PC2016) is the thirteenth data submission to be completed using the WIC PC reporting system. In April 2016, there were 90 State agencies: the 50 States, American Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the American Virgin Islands, and 34 Indian tribal organizations. Processing methods and equipment used Specifications on formats (“Guidance for States Providing Participant Data”) were provided to all State agencies in January 2016. This guide specified 20 minimum dataset (MDS) elements and 11 supplemental dataset (SDS) elements to be reported on each WIC participant. Each State Agency was required to submit all 20 MDS items and any SDS items collected by the State agency.   Study date(s) and duration The information for each participant was from the participants’ most current WIC certification as of April 2016. Due to management information constraints, Connecticut provided data for a month other than April 2016, specifically August 16 – September 15, 2016. Study spatial scale (size of replicates and spatial scale of study area) In April 2016, there were 90 State agencies: the 50 States, American Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the American Virgin Islands, and 34 Indian tribal organizations. Level of true replication Unknown Sampling precision (within-replicate sampling or pseudoreplication) State Agency Data Submissions. PC2016 is a participant dataset consisting of 8,815,472 active records. The records, submitted to USDA by the State Agencies, comprise a census of all WIC enrollees, so there is no sampling involved in the collection of this data. PII Analytic Datasets. State agency files were combined to create a national census participant file of approximately 8.8 million records. The census dataset contains potentially personally identifiable information (PII) and is therefore not made available to the public. National Sample Dataset. The public use SAS analytic dataset made available to the public has been constructed from a nationally representative sample drawn from the census of WIC participants, selected by participant category. The nationally representative sample is composed of 60,003 records. The distribution by category is 5,449 pregnant women, 4,661 breastfeeding women, 3,904 postpartum women, 13,999 infants, and 31,990 children. Level of subsampling (number and repeat or within-replicate sampling) The proportionate (or self-weighting) sample was drawn by WIC participant category: pregnant women, breastfeeding women, postpartum women, infants, and children. In this type of sample design, each WIC participant has the same probability of selection across all strata. Sampling weights are not needed when the data are analyzed. In a proportionate stratified sample, the largest stratum accounts for the highest percentage of the analytic sample. Study design (before–after, control–impacts, time series, before–after-control–impacts) None – Non-experimental Description of any data manipulation, modeling, or statistical analysis undertaken Each entry in the dataset contains all MDS and SDS information submitted by the State agency on the sampled WIC participant. In addition, the file contains constructed variables used for analytic purposes. To protect individual privacy, the public use file does not include State agency, local agency, or case identification numbers. Description of any gaps in the data or other limiting factors Due to management information constraints, Connecticut provided data for a month other than April 2016, specifically August 16 – September 15, 2016.   Outcome measurement methods and equipment used None Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: WIC Participant and Program Characteristics 2016. File Name: wicpc_2016_public.csvResource Description: The 2016 Participant and Program Characteristics (PC2016) is the thirteenth data submission to be completed using the WIC PC reporting system. In April 2016, there were 90 State agencies: the 50 States, American Samoa, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the American Virgin Islands, and 34 Indian tribal organizations.Resource Software Recommended: SAS, version 9.4,url: https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/sas9.html Resource Title: WIC Participant and Program Characteristics 2016 Codebook. File Name: WICPC2016_PUBLIC_CODEBOOK.xlsxResource Software Recommended: SAS, version 9.4,url: https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/sas9.html Resource Title: WIC Participant and Program Characteristics 2016 - Zip File with SAS, SPSS and STATA data. File Name: WIC_PC_2016_SAS_SPSS_STATA_Files.zipResource Description: WIC Participant and Program Characteristics 2016 - Zip File with SAS, SPSS and STATA data

Exercise data set for the SAS book by Uehlinger. Sample of individual variables and cases from the data set of ZA Study 0757 (political ideology). Topics: most important political problems of the country; political interest; party inclination; behavior at the polls in the Federal Parliament election 1972; political participation and willingness to participate in political protests. Demography: age; sex; marital status; religious denomination; school education; interest in politics; party preference. Übungsdatensatz zum SAS-Buch von Uehlinger. Auswahl einzelner Variablen und Fälle aus dem Datensatz der ZA-Studie 0757 (Politische Ideologie). Themen: Wichtigste politische Probleme des Landes; politisches Interesse; Parteineigung; Wahlverhalten bei der Bundestagswahl 1972; politische Partizipation und Teilnahmebereitschaft an politischen Protesten. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Familienstand; Konfession; Schulbildung; Politikinteresse; Parteipräferenz. Random selection Zufallsauswahl Oral survey with standardized questionnaire

Summary data for the studies used in the meta-analysis of local adaptation (Table 1 from the publication)This table contains the data used in this published meta-analysis. The data were originally extracted from the publications listed in the table. The file corresponds to Table 1 in the original publication.tb1.xlsSAS script used to perform meta-analysesThis file contains the essential elements of the SAS script used to perform meta-analyses published in Hoeksema & Forde 2008. Multi-factor models were fit to the data using weighted maximum likelihood estimation of parameters in a mixed model framework, using SAS PROC MIXED, in which the species traits and experimental design factors were considered fixed effects, and a random between-studies variance component was estimated. Significance (at alpha = 0.05) of individual factors in these models was determined using randomization procedures with 10,000 iterations (performed with a combination of macros in SAS), in which effect sizes a...

The Data Science Platform market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $10.15 billion in 2025 and exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 23.50% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. The increasing availability and affordability of cloud computing resources are lowering the barrier to entry for organizations of all sizes seeking to leverage data science capabilities. Furthermore, the growing volume and complexity of data generated across various industries necessitates sophisticated platforms for efficient data processing, analysis, and model deployment. The rise of AI and machine learning further fuels demand, as organizations strive to gain competitive advantages through data-driven insights and automation. Strong demand from sectors like IT and Telecom, BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance), and Retail & E-commerce are major contributors to market growth. The preference for cloud-based deployment models over on-premise solutions is also accelerating market expansion, driven by scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. Market segmentation reveals a diverse landscape. While large enterprises are currently major consumers, the increasing adoption of data science by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) represents a significant growth opportunity. The platform offering segment is anticipated to maintain a substantial market share, driven by the need for comprehensive tools that integrate data ingestion, processing, modeling, and deployment capabilities. Geographically, North America and Europe are currently leading the market, but the Asia-Pacific region, particularly China and India, is poised for significant growth due to expanding digital economies and increasing investments in data science initiatives. Competitive intensity is high, with established players like IBM, SAS, and Microsoft competing alongside innovative startups like DataRobot and Databricks. This competitive landscape fosters innovation and further accelerates market expansion. Recent developments include: November 2023 - Stagwell announced a partnership with Google Cloud and SADA, a Google Cloud premier partner, to develop generative AI (gen AI) marketing solutions that support Stagwell agencies, client partners, and product development within the Stagwell Marketing Cloud (SMC). The partnership will help in harnessing data analytics and insights by developing and training a proprietary Stagwell large language model (LLM) purpose-built for Stagwell clients, productizing data assets via APIs to create new digital experiences for brands, and multiplying the value of their first-party data ecosystems to drive new revenue streams using Vertex AI and open source-based models., May 2023 - IBM launched a new AI and data platform, watsonx, it is aimed at allowing businesses to accelerate advanced AI usage with trusted data, speed and governance. IBM also introduced GPU-as-a-service, which is designed to support AI intensive workloads, with an AI dashboard to measure, track and help report on cloud carbon emissions. With watsonx, IBM offers an AI development studio with access to IBMcurated and trained foundation models and open-source models, access to a data store to gather and clean up training and tune data,. Key drivers for this market are: Rapid Increase in Big Data, Emerging Promising Use Cases of Data Science and Machine Learning; Shift of Organizations Toward Data-intensive Approach and Decisions. Potential restraints include: Lack of Skillset in Workforce, Data Security and Reliability Concerns. Notable trends are: Small and Medium Enterprises to Witness Major Growth.

IntroductionA required step for presenting results of clinical studies is the declaration of participants demographic and baseline characteristics as claimed by the FDAAA 801. The common workflow to accomplish this task is to export the clinical data from the used electronic data capture system and import it into statistical software like SAS software or IBM SPSS. This software requires trained users, who have to implement the analysis individually for each item. These expenditures may become an obstacle for small studies. Objective of this work is to design, implement and evaluate an open source application, called ODM Data Analysis, for the semi-automatic analysis of clinical study data.MethodsThe system requires clinical data in the CDISC Operational Data Model format. After uploading the file, its syntax and data type conformity of the collected data is validated. The completeness of the study data is determined and basic statistics, including illustrative charts for each item, are generated. Datasets from four clinical studies have been used to evaluate the application’s performance and functionality.ResultsThe system is implemented as an open source web application (available at https://odmanalysis.uni-muenster.de) and also provided as Docker image which enables an easy distribution and installation on local systems. Study data is only stored in the application as long as the calculations are performed which is compliant with data protection endeavors. Analysis times are below half an hour, even for larger studies with over 6000 subjects.DiscussionMedical experts have ensured the usefulness of this application to grant an overview of their collected study data for monitoring purposes and to generate descriptive statistics without further user interaction. The semi-automatic analysis has its limitations and cannot replace the complex analysis of statisticians, but it can be used as a starting point for their examination and reporting.

analyze the current population survey (cps) annual social and economic supplement (asec) with r the annual march cps-asec has been supplying the statistics for the census bureau's report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage since 1948. wow. the us census bureau and the bureau of labor statistics ( bls) tag-team on this one. until the american community survey (acs) hit the scene in the early aughts (2000s), the current population survey had the largest sample size of all the annual general demographic data sets outside of the decennial census - about two hundred thousand respondents. this provides enough sample to conduct state- and a few large metro area-level analyses. your sample size will vanish if you start investigating subgroups b y state - consider pooling multiple years. county-level is a no-no. despite the american community survey's larger size, the cps-asec contains many more variables related to employment, sources of income, and insurance - and can be trended back to harry truman's presidency. aside from questions specifically asked about an annual experience (like income), many of the questions in this march data set should be t reated as point-in-time statistics. cps-asec generalizes to the united states non-institutional, non-active duty military population. the national bureau of economic research (nber) provides sas, spss, and stata importation scripts to create a rectangular file (rectangular data means only person-level records; household- and family-level information gets attached to each person). to import these files into r, the parse.SAScii function uses nber's sas code to determine how to import the fixed-width file, then RSQLite to put everything into a schnazzy database. you can try reading through the nber march 2012 sas importation code yourself, but it's a bit of a proc freak show. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2005-2012 asec - download all microdata.R down load the fixed-width file containing household, family, and person records import by separating this file into three tables, then merge 'em together at the person-level download the fixed-width file containing the person-level replicate weights merge the rectangular person-level file with the replicate weights, then store it in a sql database create a new variable - one - in the data table 2012 asec - analysis examples.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' progr am create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights perform a boatload of analysis examples replicate census estimates - 2011.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' program create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights match the sas output shown in the png file below 2011 asec replicate weight sas output.png statistic and standard error generated from the replicate-weighted example sas script contained in this census-provided person replicate weights usage instructions document. click here to view these three scripts for more detail about the current population survey - annual social and economic supplement (cps-asec), visit: the census bureau's current population survey page the bureau of labor statistics' current population survey page the current population survey's wikipedia article notes: interviews are conducted in march about experiences during the previous year. the file labeled 2012 includes information (income, work experience, health insurance) pertaining to 2011. when you use the current populat ion survey to talk about america, subract a year from the data file name. as of the 2010 file (the interview focusing on america during 2009), the cps-asec contains exciting new medical out-of-pocket spending variables most useful for supplemental (medical spending-adjusted) poverty research. confidential to sas, spss, stata, sudaan users: why are you still rubbing two sticks together after we've invented the butane lighter? time to transition to r. :D

The raw data for each of the analyses are presented. Baseline severity difference (probands only) (Figure A in S1 Dataset), Repeated measures analysis of change in lesion severity (Figure B in S1 Dataset). Logistic regression of survivorship (Figure C in S1 Dataset). Time to cure (Figure D in S1 Dataset). Each data set is given as a SAS code for the data itself, and the equivalent analysis to that performed in JMP (and reported in the text). Data are presented in SAS format as this is a simple text format. The data and code were generated as direct exports from JMP, and additional SAS code added as needed (for instance, JMP does not export code for post-hoc tests). Note, however, that SAS rounds to less precision than JMP, and can give slightly different results, especially for REML methods. (DOCX)

Multienvironment trials (METs) enable the evaluation of the same genotypes under a v ariety of environments and management conditions. We present META (Multi Environment Trial Analysis), a suite of 31 SAS programs that analyze METs with complete or incomplete block designs, with or without adjustment by a covariate. The entire program is run through a graphical user interface. The program can produce boxplots or histograms for all traits, as well as univariate statistics. It also calculates best linear unbiased estimators (BLUEs) and best linear unbiased predictors for the main response variable and BLUEs for all other traits. For all traits, it calculates variance components by restricted maximum likelihood, least significant difference, coefficient of variation, and broad-sense heritability using PROC MIXED. The program can analyze each location separately, combine the analysis by management conditions, or combine all locations. The flexibility and simplicity of use of this program makes it a valuable tool for analyzing METs in breeding and agronomy. The META program can be used by any researcher who knows only a few fundamental principles of SAS.

In 2020, SAS Institute (short for Statistical Analysis System) generated ** percent of its software revenue in the Americas region. The company's revenue in that year was three billion U.S. dollars, of which SAS reinvested ** percent in research and development. This share is significantly higher than with most other software companies.

SAS is one of the leading analytics software providers

With a share of almost ** percent, SAS Institute is the leading vendor in the global advanced and predictive analytics software market, where SAS competes with IBM, MathWorks, Alteryx, and Microsoft for market share. SAS also holds single to double-digit percentages in all other segments of the overall big data and analytics software market, including BI and analytics tools, artificial intelligence software platforms, analytic data integration and integrity software, and customer relationship analytics applications. The company's share of the overall big data and analytics software market stands at around five percent, putting SAS amongst the top vendors in the market behind Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, IBM, and Salesforce.

90 percent of Fortune *** companies use SAS products

The SAS Institute developed out of a project at the agricultural department at the North Carolina State University in the *****. The company's current CEO James Goodnight and other participants of the project established it as a private company in 1976. As of 2020, the company had ****** employees worldwide, selling and providing its software analytics products and services to customers in *** countries. The company's software is installed at more than ** thousand government, university, and business sites and is used by more than ** percent of the top companies on the 2020 Fortune *** list.

Each attempt was replicated at least three times, and values of three observations for each point were considered for statistical analysis.*indicated the values are significant at p

This dataset is about books. It has 2 rows and is filtered where the book is Survival analysis with interval-censored data : a practical approach with R, SAS and WinBUGS. It features 7 columns including author, publication date, language, and book publisher.

SAS Code for Spatial Optimization of Supply Chain Network for Nitrogen Based Fertilizer in North America, by type, by mode of transportation, per county, for all major crops, using Proc OptModel. the code specifies set of random values to run the mixed integer stochastic spatial optimization model repeatedly and collect results for each simulation that are then compiled and exported to be projected in GIS (geographic information systems). Certain supply nodes (fertilizer plants) are specified to work at either 70 percent of their capacities or more. Capacities for nodes of supply (fertilizer plants), demand (county centroids), transhipment nodes (transfer points-mode may change), and actual distance travelled are specified over arcs.

The GAPs Data Repository provides a comprehensive overview of available qualitative and quantitative data on national return regimes, now accessible through an advanced web interface at https://data.returnmigration.eu/.

This updated guideline outlines the complete process, starting from the initial data collection for the return migration data repository to the development of a comprehensive web-based platform. Through iterative development, participatory approaches, and rigorous quality checks, we have ensured a systematic representation of return migration data at both national and comparative levels.

The Repository organizes data into five main categories, covering diverse aspects and offering a holistic view of return regimes: country profiles, legislation, infrastructure, international cooperation, and descriptive statistics. These categories, further divided into subcategories, are based on insights from a literature review, existing datasets, and empirical data collection from 14 countries. The selection of categories prioritizes relevance for understanding return and readmission policies and practices, data accessibility, reliability, clarity, and comparability. Raw data is meticulously collected by the national experts.

The transition to a web-based interface builds upon the Repository’s original structure, which was initially developed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). It is a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases.The REDCAP ensures systematic data entries and store them on Uppsala University’s servers while significantly improving accessibility and usability as well as data security. It also enables users to export any or all data from the Project when granted full data export privileges. Data can be exported in various ways and formats, including Microsoft Excel, SAS, Stata, R, or SPSS for analysis. At this stage, the Data Repository design team also converted tailored records of available data into public reports accessible to anyone with a unique URL, without the need to log in to REDCap or obtain permission to access the GAPs Project Data Repository. Public reports can be used to share information with stakeholders or external partners without granting them access to the Project or requiring them to set up a personal account. Currently, all public report links inserted in this report are also available on the Repository’s webpage, allowing users to export original data.

This report also includes a detailed codebook to help users understand the structure, variables, and methodologies used in data collection and organization. This addition ensures transparency and provides a comprehensive framework for researchers and practitioners to effectively interpret the data.

The GAPs Data Repository is committed to providing accessible, well-organized, and reliable data by moving to a centralized web platform and incorporating advanced visuals. This Repository aims to contribute inputs for research, policy analysis, and evidence-based decision-making in the return and readmission field.

Explore the GAPs Data Repository at https://data.returnmigration.eu/.

analyze the survey of income and program participation (sipp) with r if the census bureau's budget was gutted and only one complex sample survey survived, pray it's the survey of income and program participation (sipp). it's giant. it's rich with variables. it's monthly. it follows households over three, four, now five year panels. the congressional budget office uses it for their health insurance simulation . analysts read that sipp has person-month files, get scurred, and retreat to inferior options. the american community survey may be the mount everest of survey data, but sipp is most certainly the amazon. questions swing wild and free through the jungle canopy i mean core data dictionary. legend has it that there are still species of topical module variables that scientists like you have yet to analyze. ponce de león would've loved it here. ponce. what a name. what a guy. the sipp 2008 panel data started from a sample of 105,663 individuals in 42,030 households. once the sample gets drawn, the census bureau surveys one-fourth of the respondents every four months, over f our or five years (panel durations vary). you absolutely must read and understand pdf pages 3, 4, and 5 of this document before starting any analysis (start at the header 'waves and rotation groups'). if you don't comprehend what's going on, try their survey design tutorial. since sipp collects information from respondents regarding every month over the duration of the panel, you'll need to be hyper-aware of whether you want your results to be point-in-time, annualized, or specific to some other period. the analysis scripts below provide examples of each. at every four-month interview point, every respondent answers every core question for the previous four months. after that, wave-specific addenda (called topical modules) get asked, but generally only regarding a single prior month. to repeat: core wave files contain four records per person, topical modules contain one. if you stacked every core wave, you would have one record per person per month for the duration o f the panel. mmmassive. ~100,000 respondents x 12 months x ~4 years. have an analysis plan before you start writing code so you extract exactly what you need, nothing more. better yet, modify something of mine. cool? this new github repository contains eight, you read me, eight scripts: 1996 panel - download and create database.R 2001 panel - download and create database.R 2004 panel - download and create database.R 2008 panel - download and create database.R since some variables are character strings in one file and integers in anoth er, initiate an r function to harmonize variable class inconsistencies in the sas importation scripts properly handle the parentheses seen in a few of the sas importation scripts, because the SAScii package currently does not create an rsqlite database, initiate a variant of the read.SAScii function that imports ascii data directly into a sql database (.db) download each microdata file - weights, topical modules, everything - then read 'em into sql 2008 panel - full year analysis examples.R< br /> define which waves and specific variables to pull into ram, based on the year chosen loop through each of twelve months, constructing a single-year temporary table inside the database read that twelve-month file into working memory, then save it for faster loading later if you like read the main and replicate weights columns into working memory too, merge everything construct a few annualized and demographic columns using all twelve months' worth of information construct a replicate-weighted complex sample design with a fay's adjustment factor of one-half, again save it for faster loading later, only if you're so inclined reproduce census-publish ed statistics, not precisely (due to topcoding described here on pdf page 19) 2008 panel - point-in-time analysis examples.R define which wave(s) and specific variables to pull into ram, based on the calendar month chosen read that interview point (srefmon)- or calendar month (rhcalmn)-based file into working memory read the topical module and replicate weights files into working memory too, merge it like you mean it construct a few new, exciting variables using both core and topical module questions construct a replicate-weighted complex sample design with a fay's adjustment factor of one-half reproduce census-published statistics, not exactly cuz the authors of this brief used the generalized variance formula (gvf) to calculate the margin of error - see pdf page 4 for more detail - the friendly statisticians at census recommend using the replicate weights whenever possible. oh hayy, now it is. 2008 panel - median value of household assets.R define which wave(s) and spe cific variables to pull into ram, based on the topical module chosen read the topical module and replicate weights files into working memory too, merge once again construct a replicate-weighted complex sample design with a...

The Situation Awareness System (SAS) market, valued at $23.1 billion in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, driven by increasing demand for enhanced security and operational efficiency across various sectors. A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.6% from 2025 to 2033 indicates a steady expansion, reaching an estimated market size exceeding $35 billion by 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalable and cost-effective SAS deployments, attracting businesses of all sizes. Furthermore, the increasing prevalence of cyber threats and the need for proactive risk management are major catalysts for SAS adoption. Government regulations mandating improved security and surveillance in critical infrastructure further contribute to market expansion. The market is segmented by deployment (cloud, on-premise), application (security, transportation, healthcare), and end-user (government, commercial). Competition is intense, with established players like Microsoft and SAS Institute vying for market share alongside specialized providers like Qognify and Verint. However, the emergence of agile cloud-based solutions from companies such as Tencent Cloud and Huawei Cloud is disrupting the traditional landscape and offering alternative, competitive solutions. The competitive landscape is dynamic, characterized by both established players and emerging technology providers. While legacy companies offer comprehensive solutions with established customer bases, newer entrants bring innovative, cost-effective cloud-based solutions that are particularly attractive to smaller businesses and those seeking rapid deployment. Geographic expansion, particularly in developing economies with growing infrastructure needs, presents significant opportunities for market expansion. However, challenges remain, including the integration complexities of SAS into existing IT infrastructures and the need for skilled personnel to operate and manage these systems effectively. Addressing data privacy concerns and ensuring regulatory compliance will also be crucial for sustained market growth. The market will likely see continued consolidation, with larger players potentially acquiring smaller firms to expand their product portfolios and market reach.

Data in SPSS and syntax codes for SAS for the article: "THC in oral fluid: A rapid review and meta-analysis."