The purpose of data mining analysis is always to find patterns of the data using certain kind of techiques such as classification or regression. It is not always feasible to apply classification algorithms directly to dataset. Before doing any work on the data, the data has to be pre-processed and this process normally involves feature selection and dimensionality reduction. We tried to use clustering as a way to reduce the dimension of the data and create new features. Based on our project, after using clustering prior to classification, the performance has not improved much. The reason why it has not improved could be the features we selected to perform clustering are not well suited for it. Because of the nature of the data, classification tasks are going to provide more information to work with in terms of improving knowledge and overall performance metrics. From the dimensionality reduction perspective: It is different from Principle Component Analysis which guarantees finding the best linear transformation that reduces the number of dimensions with a minimum loss of information. Using clusters as a technique of reducing the data dimension will lose a lot of information since clustering techniques are based a metric of 'distance'. At high dimensions euclidean distance loses pretty much all meaning. Therefore using clustering as a "Reducing" dimensionality by mapping data points to cluster numbers is not always good since you may lose almost all the information. From the creating new features perspective: Clustering analysis creates labels based on the patterns of the data, it brings uncertainties into the data. By using clustering prior to classification, the decision on the number of clusters will highly affect the performance of the clustering, then affect the performance of classification. If the part of features we use clustering techniques on is very suited for it, it might increase the overall performance on classification. For example, if the features we use k-means on are numerical and the dimension is small, the overall classification performance may be better. We did not lock in the clustering outputs using a random_state in the effort to see if they were stable. Our assumption was that if the results vary highly from run to run which they definitely did, maybe the data just does not cluster well with the methods selected at all. Basically, the ramification we saw was that our results are not much better than random when applying clustering to the data preprocessing. Finally, it is important to ensure a feedback loop is in place to continuously collect the same data in the same format from which the models were created. This feedback loop can be used to measure the model real world effectiveness and also to continue to revise the models from time to time as things change.

The SPHERE is students' performance in physics education research dataset. It is presented as a multi-domain learning dataset of students’ performance on physics that has been collected through several research-based assessments (RBAs) established by the physics education research (PER) community. A total of 497 eleventh-grade students were involved from three large and a small public high school located in a suburban district of a high-populated province in Indonesia. Some variables related to demographics, accessibility to literature resources, and students’ physics identity are also investigated. Some RBAs utilized in this data were selected based on concepts learned by the students in the Indonesian physics curriculum. We commenced the survey of students’ understanding on Newtonian mechanics at the end of the first semester using Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE). In the second semester, we assessed the students’ scientific abilities and learning attitude through Scientific Abilities Assessment Rubrics (SAAR) and the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) respectively. The conceptual assessments were continued at the second semester measured through Rotational and Rolling Motion Conceptual Survey (RRMCS), Fluid Mechanics Concept Inventory (FMCI), Mechanical Waves Conceptual Survey (MWCS), Thermal Concept Evaluation (TCE), and Survey of Thermodynamic Processes and First and Second Laws (STPFaSL). We expect SPHERE could be a valuable dataset for supporting the advancement of the PER field particularly in quantitative studies. For example, there is a need to help advance research on using machine learning and data mining techniques in PER that might face challenges due to the unavailable dataset for the specific purpose of PER studies. SPHERE can be reused as a students’ performance dataset on physics specifically dedicated for PER scholars which might be willing to implement machine learning techniques in physics education.

The LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus)

April 2020 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk) Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny MirkesThe data are extracted from the Web of Science [1]. You may not copy or distribute these data in whole or in part without the written consent of Clarivate Analytics.[Version 2] A further cleaning is applied in Data Processing for LSC Abstracts in Version 1*. Details of cleaning procedure are explained in Step 6.* Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v1.Getting StartedThis text provides the information on the LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) and pre-processing steps on abstracts, and describes the structure of files to organise the corpus. This corpus is created to be used in future work on the quantification of the meaning of research texts and make it available for use in Natural Language Processing projects.LSC is a collection of abstracts of articles and proceeding papers published in 2014, and indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) database [1]. The corpus contains only documents in English. Each document in the corpus contains the following parts:1. Authors: The list of authors of the paper2. Title: The title of the paper 3. Abstract: The abstract of the paper 4. Categories: One or more category from the list of categories [2]. Full list of categories is presented in file ‘List_of _Categories.txt’. 5. Research Areas: One or more research area from the list of research areas [3]. Full list of research areas is presented in file ‘List_of_Research_Areas.txt’. 6. Total Times cited: The number of times the paper was cited by other items from all databases within Web of Science platform [4] 7. Times cited in Core Collection: The total number of times the paper was cited by other papers within the WoS Core Collection [4]The corpus was collected in July 2018 online and contains the number of citations from publication date to July 2018. We describe a document as the collection of information (about a paper) listed above. The total number of documents in LSC is 1,673,350.Data ProcessingStep 1: Downloading of the Data Online

The dataset is collected manually by exporting documents as Tab-delimitated files online. All documents are available online.Step 2: Importing the Dataset to R

The LSC was collected as TXT files. All documents are extracted to R.Step 3: Cleaning the Data from Documents with Empty Abstract or without CategoryAs our research is based on the analysis of abstracts and categories, all documents with empty abstracts and documents without categories are removed.Step 4: Identification and Correction of Concatenate Words in AbstractsEspecially medicine-related publications use ‘structured abstracts’. Such type of abstracts are divided into sections with distinct headings such as introduction, aim, objective, method, result, conclusion etc. Used tool for extracting abstracts leads concatenate words of section headings with the first word of the section. For instance, we observe words such as ConclusionHigher and ConclusionsRT etc. The detection and identification of such words is done by sampling of medicine-related publications with human intervention. Detected concatenate words are split into two words. For instance, the word ‘ConclusionHigher’ is split into ‘Conclusion’ and ‘Higher’.The section headings in such abstracts are listed below:

Background Method(s) Design Theoretical Measurement(s) Location Aim(s) Methodology Process Abstract Population Approach Objective(s) Purpose(s) Subject(s) Introduction Implication(s) Patient(s) Procedure(s) Hypothesis Measure(s) Setting(s) Limitation(s) Discussion Conclusion(s) Result(s) Finding(s) Material (s) Rationale(s) Implications for health and nursing policyStep 5: Extracting (Sub-setting) the Data Based on Lengths of AbstractsAfter correction, the lengths of abstracts are calculated. ‘Length’ indicates the total number of words in the text, calculated by the same rule as for Microsoft Word ‘word count’ [5].According to APA style manual [6], an abstract should contain between 150 to 250 words. In LSC, we decided to limit length of abstracts from 30 to 500 words in order to study documents with abstracts of typical length ranges and to avoid the effect of the length to the analysis.

Step 6: [Version 2] Cleaning Copyright Notices, Permission polices, Journal Names and Conference Names from LSC Abstracts in Version 1Publications can include a footer of copyright notice, permission policy, journal name, licence, author’s right or conference name below the text of abstract by conferences and journals. Used tool for extracting and processing abstracts in WoS database leads to attached such footers to the text. For example, our casual observation yields that copyright notices such as ‘Published by Elsevier ltd.’ is placed in many texts. To avoid abnormal appearances of words in further analysis of words such as bias in frequency calculation, we performed a cleaning procedure on such sentences and phrases in abstracts of LSC version 1. We removed copyright notices, names of conferences, names of journals, authors’ rights, licenses and permission policies identified by sampling of abstracts.Step 7: [Version 2] Re-extracting (Sub-setting) the Data Based on Lengths of AbstractsThe cleaning procedure described in previous step leaded to some abstracts having less than our minimum length criteria (30 words). 474 texts were removed.Step 8: Saving the Dataset into CSV FormatDocuments are saved into 34 CSV files. In CSV files, the information is organised with one record on each line and parts of abstract, title, list of authors, list of categories, list of research areas, and times cited is recorded in fields.To access the LSC for research purposes, please email to ns433@le.ac.uk.References[1]Web of Science. (15 July). Available: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/ [2]WoS Subject Categories. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS56B5/help/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.html [3]Research Areas in WoS. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca.html [4]Times Cited in WoS Core Collection. (15 July). Available: https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Web-of-Science-Times-Cited-accessibility-and-variation?language=en_US [5]Word Count. Available: https://support.office.com/en-us/article/show-word-count-3c9e6a11-a04d-43b4-977c-563a0e0d5da3 [6]A. P. Association, Publication manual. American Psychological Association Washington, DC, 1983.

LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary)April 2020 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk/suzenneslihan@hotmail.com)Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny Mirkes[Version 3] The third version of LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary) is created from the updated LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) - Version 2*. All pre-processing steps applied to build the new version of the dictionary are the same as in Version 2** and can be found in description of Version 2 below. We did not repeat the explanation. After pre-processing steps, the total number of unique words in the new version of the dictionary is 972,060. The files provided with this description are also same as described as for LScD Version 2 below.* Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v2** Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9746900.v2[Version 2] Getting StartedThis document provides the pre-processing steps for creating an ordered list of words from the LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) [1] and the description of LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary). This dictionary is created to be used in future work on the quantification of the meaning of research texts. R code for producing the dictionary from LSC and instructions for usage of the code are available in [2]. The code can be also used for list of texts from other sources, amendments to the code may be required.LSC is a collection of abstracts of articles and proceeding papers published in 2014 and indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) database [3]. Each document contains title, list of authors, list of categories, list of research areas, and times cited. The corpus contains only documents in English. The corpus was collected in July 2018 and contains the number of citations from publication date to July 2018. The total number of documents in LSC is 1,673,824.LScD is an ordered list of words from texts of abstracts in LSC.The dictionary stores 974,238 unique words, is sorted by the number of documents containing the word in descending order. All words in the LScD are in stemmed form of words. The LScD contains the following information:1.Unique words in abstracts2.Number of documents containing each word3.Number of appearance of a word in the entire corpusProcessing the LSCStep 1.Downloading the LSC Online: Use of the LSC is subject to acceptance of request of the link by email. To access the LSC for research purposes, please email to ns433@le.ac.uk. The data are extracted from Web of Science [3]. You may not copy or distribute these data in whole or in part without the written consent of Clarivate Analytics.Step 2.Importing the Corpus to R: The full R code for processing the corpus can be found in the GitHub [2].All following steps can be applied for arbitrary list of texts from any source with changes of parameter. The structure of the corpus such as file format and names (also the position) of fields should be taken into account to apply our code. The organisation of CSV files of LSC is described in README file for LSC [1].Step 3.Extracting Abstracts and Saving Metadata: Metadata that include all fields in a document excluding abstracts and the field of abstracts are separated. Metadata are then saved as MetaData.R. Fields of metadata are: List_of_Authors, Title, Categories, Research_Areas, Total_Times_Cited and Times_cited_in_Core_Collection.Step 4.Text Pre-processing Steps on the Collection of Abstracts: In this section, we presented our approaches to pre-process abstracts of the LSC.1.Removing punctuations and special characters: This is the process of substitution of all non-alphanumeric characters by space. We did not substitute the character “-” in this step, because we need to keep words like “z-score”, “non-payment” and “pre-processing” in order not to lose the actual meaning of such words. A processing of uniting prefixes with words are performed in later steps of pre-processing.2.Lowercasing the text data: Lowercasing is performed to avoid considering same words like “Corpus”, “corpus” and “CORPUS” differently. Entire collection of texts are converted to lowercase.3.Uniting prefixes of words: Words containing prefixes joined with character “-” are united as a word. The list of prefixes united for this research are listed in the file “list_of_prefixes.csv”. The most of prefixes are extracted from [4]. We also added commonly used prefixes: ‘e’, ‘extra’, ‘per’, ‘self’ and ‘ultra’.4.Substitution of words: Some of words joined with “-” in the abstracts of the LSC require an additional process of substitution to avoid losing the meaning of the word before removing the character “-”. Some examples of such words are “z-test”, “well-known” and “chi-square”. These words have been substituted to “ztest”, “wellknown” and “chisquare”. Identification of such words is done by sampling of abstracts form LSC. The full list of such words and decision taken for substitution are presented in the file “list_of_substitution.csv”.5.Removing the character “-”: All remaining character “-” are replaced by space.6.Removing numbers: All digits which are not included in a word are replaced by space. All words that contain digits and letters are kept because alphanumeric characters such as chemical formula might be important for our analysis. Some examples are “co2”, “h2o” and “21st”.7.Stemming: Stemming is the process of converting inflected words into their word stem. This step results in uniting several forms of words with similar meaning into one form and also saving memory space and time [5]. All words in the LScD are stemmed to their word stem.8.Stop words removal: Stop words are words that are extreme common but provide little value in a language. Some common stop words in English are ‘I’, ‘the’, ‘a’ etc. We used ‘tm’ package in R to remove stop words [6]. There are 174 English stop words listed in the package.Step 5.Writing the LScD into CSV Format: There are 1,673,824 plain processed texts for further analysis. All unique words in the corpus are extracted and written in the file “LScD.csv”.The Organisation of the LScDThe total number of words in the file “LScD.csv” is 974,238. Each field is described below:Word: It contains unique words from the corpus. All words are in lowercase and their stem forms. The field is sorted by the number of documents that contain words in descending order.Number of Documents Containing the Word: In this content, binary calculation is used: if a word exists in an abstract then there is a count of 1. If the word exits more than once in a document, the count is still 1. Total number of document containing the word is counted as the sum of 1s in the entire corpus.Number of Appearance in Corpus: It contains how many times a word occurs in the corpus when the corpus is considered as one large document.Instructions for R CodeLScD_Creation.R is an R script for processing the LSC to create an ordered list of words from the corpus [2]. Outputs of the code are saved as RData file and in CSV format. Outputs of the code are:Metadata File: It includes all fields in a document excluding abstracts. Fields are List_of_Authors, Title, Categories, Research_Areas, Total_Times_Cited and Times_cited_in_Core_Collection.File of Abstracts: It contains all abstracts after pre-processing steps defined in the step 4.DTM: It is the Document Term Matrix constructed from the LSC[6]. Each entry of the matrix is the number of times the word occurs in the corresponding document.LScD: An ordered list of words from LSC as defined in the previous section.The code can be used by:1.Download the folder ‘LSC’, ‘list_of_prefixes.csv’ and ‘list_of_substitution.csv’2.Open LScD_Creation.R script3.Change parameters in the script: replace with the full path of the directory with source files and the full path of the directory to write output files4.Run the full code.References[1]N. Suzen. (2019). LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) [Dataset]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v1[2]N. Suzen. (2019). LScD-LEICESTER SCIENTIFIC DICTIONARY CREATION. Available: https://github.com/neslihansuzen/LScD-LEICESTER-SCIENTIFIC-DICTIONARY-CREATION[3]Web of Science. (15 July). Available: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/[4]A. Thomas, "Common Prefixes, Suffixes and Roots," Center for Development and Learning, 2013.[5]C. Ramasubramanian and R. Ramya, "Effective pre-processing activities in text mining using improved porter’s stemming algorithm," International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 4536-4538, 2013.[6]I. Feinerer, "Introduction to the tm Package Text Mining in R," Accessible en ligne: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tm/vignettes/tm.pdf, 2013.

Audio examples for my master's thesis.

The complete dataset used in the analysis comprises 36 samples, each described by 11 numeric features and 1 target. The attributes considered were caspase 3/7 activity, Mitotracker red CMXRos area and intensity (3 h and 24 h incubations with both compounds), Mitosox oxidation (3 h incubation with the referred compounds) and oxidation rate, DCFDA fluorescence (3 h and 24 h incubations with either compound) and oxidation rate, and DQ BSA hydrolysis. The target of each instance corresponds to one of the 9 possible classes (4 samples per class): Control, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µM for 6-OHDA and 0.03, 0.06, 0.125 and 0.25 µM for rotenone. The dataset is balanced, it does not contain any missing values and data was standardized across features. The small number of samples prevented a full and strong statistical analysis of the results. Nevertheless, it allowed the identification of relevant hidden patterns and trends.

Exploratory data analysis, information gain, hierarchical clustering, and supervised predictive modeling were performed using Orange Data Mining version 3.25.1 [41]. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the Euclidean distance metric and weighted linkage. Cluster maps were plotted to relate the features with higher mutual information (in rows) with instances (in columns), with the color of each cell representing the normalized level of a particular feature in a specific instance. The information is grouped both in rows and in columns by a two-way hierarchical clustering method using the Euclidean distances and average linkage. Stratified cross-validation was used to train the supervised decision tree. A set of preliminary empirical experiments were performed to choose the best parameters for each algorithm, and we verified that, within moderate variations, there were no significant changes in the outcome. The following settings were adopted for the decision tree algorithm: minimum number of samples in leaves: 2; minimum number of samples required to split an internal node: 5; stop splitting when majority reaches: 95%; criterion: gain ratio. The performance of the supervised model was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure and area under the ROC curve (AUC) metrics.

Complete list of features selected in the training set with raw and ratio data by applying Elastic Smoothly Clipped Absolute Deviation (SCAD) Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF) with Boruta feature selection method and Prediction Analysis for Microarrays (PAM) on bootstrap samples. (XLS 114Â kb)

In the current cybersecurity landscape, Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks have become a prevalent form of cybercrime. These attacks are relatively easy to execute but can cause significant disruption and damage to targeted systems and networks. Generally, attackers perform it to make reprisal but sometimes this issue can be authentic also. In this paper basically conversed about some deep learning models that will hand over a descent accuracy in prediction of DDoS attacks. This study evaluates various models, including Vanilla LSTM, Stacked LSTM, Deep Neural Networks (DNN), and other machine learning models such as Random Forest, AdaBoost, and Gaussian Naive Bayes to determine the DDoS attack along with comparing these approaches as well as perceiving which one is about to give elegant outcomes in prediction. The rationale for selecting Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for evaluation in our study is based on their proven effectiveness in modeling sequential and time-series data, which are inherent characteristics of network traffic and cybersecurity data. Here, a benchmark dataset named CICDDoS2019 is used that contains 88 features from which a handful (22) convenient features are extracted further deep learning models are applied. The result that is acquired here is significantly better than available techniques those are attainable in this context by using Machine Learning models, data mining techniques and some IOT based approaches. It’s not possible to completely avoid your server from these threats but by applying discussed techniques in the present juncture, these attacks can be prevented to an extent and it will also help to server to fulfil the genuine requests instead of sticking in the accomplishing the requests created by the unauthentic user.

Market Basket Analysis

Market basket analysis with Apriori algorithm

The retailer wants to target customers with suggestions on itemset that a customer is most likely to purchase .I was given dataset contains data of a retailer; the transaction data provides data around all the transactions that have happened over a period of time. Retailer will use result to grove in his industry and provide for customer suggestions on itemset, we be able increase customer engagement and improve customer experience and identify customer behavior. I will solve this problem with use Association Rules type of unsupervised learning technique that checks for the dependency of one data item on another data item.

Introduction

Association Rule is most used when you are planning to build association in different objects in a set. It works when you are planning to find frequent patterns in a transaction database. It can tell you what items do customers frequently buy together and it allows retailer to identify relationships between the items.

An Example of Association Rules

Assume there are 100 customers, 10 of them bought Computer Mouth, 9 bought Mat for Mouse and 8 bought both of them. - bought Computer Mouth => bought Mat for Mouse - support = P(Mouth & Mat) = 8/100 = 0.08 - confidence = support/P(Mat for Mouse) = 0.08/0.09 = 0.89 - lift = confidence/P(Computer Mouth) = 0.89/0.10 = 8.9 This just simple example. In practice, a rule needs the support of several hundred transactions, before it can be considered statistically significant, and datasets often contain thousands or millions of transactions.

Strategy

• Data Import
• Data Understanding and Exploration
• Transformation of the data – so that is ready to be consumed by the association rules algorithm
• Running association rules
• Exploring the rules generated
• Filtering the generated rules
• Visualization of Rule

Dataset Description

• File name: Assignment-1_Data
• List name: retaildata
• File format: . xlsx
• Number of Row: 522065

• Number of Attributes: 7

  • BillNo: 6-digit number assigned to each transaction. Nominal.
  • Itemname: Product name. Nominal.
  • Quantity: The quantities of each product per transaction. Numeric.
  • Date: The day and time when each transaction was generated. Numeric.
  • Price: Product price. Numeric.
  • CustomerID: 5-digit number assigned to each customer. Nominal.
  • Country: Name of the country where each customer resides. Nominal.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270162-fc53e5a3-4ad1-4d06-b0e0-228aabcf6b70.png">

Libraries in R

First, we need to load required libraries. Shortly I describe all libraries.

• arules - Provides the infrastructure for representing, manipulating and analyzing transaction data and patterns (frequent itemsets and association rules).
• arulesViz - Extends package 'arules' with various visualization. techniques for association rules and item-sets. The package also includes several interactive visualizations for rule exploration.
• tidyverse - The tidyverse is an opinionated collection of R packages designed for data science.
• readxl - Read Excel Files in R.
• plyr - Tools for Splitting, Applying and Combining Data.
• ggplot2 - A system for 'declaratively' creating graphics, based on "The Grammar of Graphics". You provide the data, tell 'ggplot2' how to map variables to aesthetics, what graphical primitives to use, and it takes care of the details.
• knitr - Dynamic Report generation in R.
• magrittr- Provides a mechanism for chaining commands with a new forward-pipe operator, %>%. This operator will forward a value, or the result of an expression, into the next function call/expression. There is flexible support for the type of right-hand side expressions.
• dplyr - A fast, consistent tool for working with data frame like objects, both in memory and out of memory.
• tidyverse - This package is designed to make it easy to install and load multiple 'tidyverse' packages in a single step.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270210-49c8e1aa-9753-431b-a8d5-99601bc76cb5.png">

Data Pre-processing

Next, we need to upload Assignment-1_Data. xlsx to R to read the dataset.Now we can see our data in R.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270229-514f0983-3bbb-4cd3-be64-980e92656a02.png"> https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270251-6f6f6472-8817-435c-a995-9bc4bfef10d1.png">

After we will clear our data frame, will remove missing values.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270286-05854e1a-2b6c-490e-ab30-9e99e731eacb.png">

To apply Association Rule mining, we need to convert dataframe into transaction data to make all items that are bought together in one invoice will be in ...

R codes for implementing the described analyses (sample processing, data pre-processing, class comparison and class prediction). Caliper matching was implemented using the nonrandom package; the t- and the AD tests were implemented using the stats package and the adk package, respectively. Notice that the updated package for implementing the AD test is kSamples. As regards the bootstrap selection and the egg-shaped plot, we respectively modified the doBS and the importance igraph functions, both included in the bootfs package. For the SVM model we used the e1071 package. (R 12Â kb)

The data was generated randomly, based on different combinations of possible actions in the dynamic simulator K-Spice from Kongsberg Digital. In case study 1, the aim was to increase +10 % of the oil production with respect to the initial condition value. In case study 2, the aim was to decrease -10 % of the gas production with respect to the initial condition value. The data show examples of possible correct and incorrect paths that a trainee could follow trying to solve the scenarios.

This thesis lays the ground work for enabling scalable data mining in massively parallel dataflow systems, using large datasets. Such datasets have become ubiquitous. We illustrate common fallacies with respect to scalable data mining: It is in no way sufficient to naively implement textbook algorithms on parallel systems; bottlenecks on all layers of the stack prevent the scalability of such naive implementations. We argue that scalability in data mining is a multi-leveled problem and must therefore be approached on the interplay of algorithms, systems, and applications. We therefore discuss a selection of scalability problems on these different levels. We investigate algorithm-specific scalability aspects of collaborative filtering algorithms for computing recommendations, a popular data mining use case with many industry deployments. We show how to efficiently execute the two most common approaches, namely neighborhood methods and latent factor models on MapReduce, and describe a specialized architecture for scaling collaborative filtering to extremely large datasets which we implemented at Twitter. We turn to system-specific scalability aspects, where we improve system performance during the distributed execution of a special class of iterative algorithms by drastically reducing the overhead required for guaranteeing fault tolerance. Therefore we propose a novel optimistic approach to fault-tolerance which exploits the robust convergence properties of a large class of fixpoint algorithms and does not incur measurable overhead in failure-free cases. Finally, we present work on an application-specific scalability aspect of scalable data mining. A common problem when deploying machine learning applications in real-world scenarios is that the prediction quality of ML models heavily depends on hyperparameters that have to be chosen in advance. We propose an algorithmic framework for an important subproblem occuring during hyperparameter search at scale: efficiently generating samples from block-partitioned matrices in a shared-nothing environment. For every selected problem, we show how to execute the resulting computation automatically in a parallel and scalable manner, and evaluate our proposed solution on large datasets with billions of datapoints.

In response to NASA SBIR topic A1.05, "Data Mining for Integrated Vehicle Health Management", Michigan Aerospace Corporation (MAC) asserts that our unique SPADE (Sparse Processing Applied to Data Exploitation) technology meets a significant fraction of the stated criteria and has functionality that enables it to handle many applications within the aircraft lifecycle. SPADE distills input data into highly quantized features and uses MAC's novel techniques for constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees to develop extremely accurate diagnostic/prognostic models for classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection and semi-supervised learning tasks. These techniques are currently being employed to do Threat Assessment for satellites in conjunction with researchers at the Air Force Research Lab. Significant advantages to this approach include: 1) completely data driven; 2) training and evaluation are faster than conventional methods; 3) operates effectively on huge datasets (> billion samples X > million features), 4) proven to be as accurate as state-of-the-art techniques in many significant real-world applications. The specific goals for Phase 1 will be to work with domain experts at NASA and with our partners Boeing, SpaceX and GMV Space Systems to delineate a subset of problems that are particularly well-suited to this approach and to determine requirements for deploying algorithms on platforms of opportunity.

SPARQL query example 1. This text file contains the SPARQL query we apply on our PGx linked data to obtain the data graph represented in Fig. 3. This query includes the definition of prefixes mentioned in Figs. 2 and 3. This query takes about 30 s on our https://pgxlod.loria.fr server. (TXT 2 kb)

SPARQL query example 2. This text file contains an example of SPARQL query that enable to explore the vicinity of an entity. This particular query returns the RDF graph surrounding, within a lenght of 4, the node pharmgkb:PA451906 that represents the warfarin, an anticoagulant drug. (TXT 392 bytes)

Snapshot img

Data Science Platform Market Size 2025-2029

The data science platform market size is valued to increase USD 763.9 million, at a CAGR of 40.2% from 2024 to 2029. Integration of AI and ML technologies with data science platforms will drive the data science platform market.

Major Market Trends & Insights

North America dominated the market and accounted for a 48% growth during the forecast period.
By Deployment - On-premises segment was valued at USD 38.70 million in 2023
By Component - Platform segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023

Market Size & Forecast

Market Opportunities: USD 1.00 million
Market Future Opportunities: USD 763.90 million
CAGR : 40.2%
North America: Largest market in 2023

Market Summary

The market represents a dynamic and continually evolving landscape, underpinned by advancements in core technologies and applications. Key technologies, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, are increasingly integrated into data science platforms to enhance predictive analytics and automate data processing. Additionally, the emergence of containerization and microservices in data science platforms enables greater flexibility and scalability. However, the market also faces challenges, including data privacy and security risks, which necessitate robust compliance with regulations.
According to recent estimates, the market is expected to account for over 30% of the overall big data analytics market by 2025, underscoring its growing importance in the data-driven business landscape.

What will be the Size of the Data Science Platform Market during the forecast period?

Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

How is the Data Science Platform Market Segmented and what are the key trends of market segmentation?

The data science platform industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Deployment

  On-premises
  Cloud


Component

  Platform
  Services


End-user

  BFSI
  Retail and e-commerce
  Manufacturing
  Media and entertainment
  Others


Sector

  Large enterprises
  SMEs


Application

  Data Preparation
  Data Visualization
  Machine Learning
  Predictive Analytics
  Data Governance
  Others


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    UK


  Middle East and Africa

    UAE


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan


  South America

    Brazil


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Deployment Insights

The on-premises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

In the dynamic and evolving the market, big data processing is a key focus, enabling advanced model accuracy metrics through various data mining methods. Distributed computing and algorithm optimization are integral components, ensuring efficient handling of large datasets. Data governance policies are crucial for managing data security protocols and ensuring data lineage tracking. Software development kits, model versioning, and anomaly detection systems facilitate seamless development, deployment, and monitoring of predictive modeling techniques, including machine learning algorithms, regression analysis, and statistical modeling. Real-time data streaming and parallelized algorithms enable real-time insights, while predictive modeling techniques and machine learning algorithms drive business intelligence and decision-making.

Cloud computing infrastructure, data visualization tools, high-performance computing, and database management systems support scalable data solutions and efficient data warehousing. ETL processes and data integration pipelines ensure data quality assessment and feature engineering techniques. Clustering techniques and natural language processing are essential for advanced data analysis. The market is witnessing significant growth, with adoption increasing by 18.7% in the past year, and industry experts anticipate a further expansion of 21.6% in the upcoming period. Companies across various sectors are recognizing the potential of data science platforms, leading to a surge in demand for scalable, secure, and efficient solutions.

API integration services and deep learning frameworks are gaining traction, offering advanced capabilities and seamless integration with existing systems. Data security protocols and model explainability methods are becoming increasingly important, ensuring transparency and trust in data-driven decision-making. The market is expected to continue unfolding, with ongoing advancements in technology and evolving business needs shaping its future trajectory.

Request Free Sample

The On-premises segment was valued at USD 38.70 million in 2019 and showed

Averaged performance of rule classifiers for supervised discretisation with transformations of the test sets based on discrete data models obtained for the training samples [%].

Hotel customer dataset with 31 variables describing a total of 83,590 instances (customers). It comprehends three full years of customer behavioral data. In addition to personal and behavioral information, the dataset also contains demographic and geographical information. This dataset contributes to reducing the lack of real-world business data that can be used for educational and research purposes. The dataset can be used in data mining, machine learning, and other analytical field problems in the scope of data science. Due to its unit of analysis, it is a dataset especially suitable for building customer segmentation models, including clustering and RFM (Recency, Frequency, and Monetary value) models, but also be used in classification and regression problems.

This dataset contains transactional data collected for market basket analysis. Each row represents a single transaction with items purchased together. It is ideal for implementing association rule mining techniques such as Apriori, FP-Growth, and other machine learning algorithms.

Key Features:

• Transactions: Lists of items purchased together in a single transaction.
• Applications: Perfect for studying customer purchase patterns, building recommendation systems, and identifying frequent item sets.
• Usage: Use this dataset to practice generating actionable insights for retailers and e-commerce platforms.

Format:

• Rows: Each row represents a transaction.
• Columns: Each column corresponds to an item in the transaction.

Examples of Potential Use Cases:

• Find combinations of items frequently purchased together.
• Predict the likelihood of items being bought together.
• Build AI-powered marketing strategies based on association rules.

Credits:

• This dataset is formatted for educational and research purposes. Feel free to use it to explore and enhance your skills in data mining and machine learning!

Image classification features and examples of statistical results for the data mining approach using a one-versus-one strategy to implement a SVM (support vector machine) multi-class classifier. Data published in: Fefilatyev, S., K. Kramer, L. Hall, D. Goldgof, R. Kasturi, A. Remsen, K. Daly. 2011. Detection of Anomalous Particles from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Using the SIPPER3 Underwater Imaging Platform. Proceedings of International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, p. 741-748. Awarded Data Mining Practice Prize at the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), Vancouver, Canada, December 11-14, 2011. DOI 10.1109/ICDMW.2011.65.