The purpose of data mining analysis is always to find patterns of the data using certain kind of techiques such as classification or regression. It is not always feasible to apply classification algorithms directly to dataset. Before doing any work on the data, the data has to be pre-processed and this process normally involves feature selection and dimensionality reduction. We tried to use clustering as a way to reduce the dimension of the data and create new features. Based on our project, after using clustering prior to classification, the performance has not improved much. The reason why it has not improved could be the features we selected to perform clustering are not well suited for it. Because of the nature of the data, classification tasks are going to provide more information to work with in terms of improving knowledge and overall performance metrics. From the dimensionality reduction perspective: It is different from Principle Component Analysis which guarantees finding the best linear transformation that reduces the number of dimensions with a minimum loss of information. Using clusters as a technique of reducing the data dimension will lose a lot of information since clustering techniques are based a metric of 'distance'. At high dimensions euclidean distance loses pretty much all meaning. Therefore using clustering as a "Reducing" dimensionality by mapping data points to cluster numbers is not always good since you may lose almost all the information. From the creating new features perspective: Clustering analysis creates labels based on the patterns of the data, it brings uncertainties into the data. By using clustering prior to classification, the decision on the number of clusters will highly affect the performance of the clustering, then affect the performance of classification. If the part of features we use clustering techniques on is very suited for it, it might increase the overall performance on classification. For example, if the features we use k-means on are numerical and the dimension is small, the overall classification performance may be better. We did not lock in the clustering outputs using a random_state in the effort to see if they were stable. Our assumption was that if the results vary highly from run to run which they definitely did, maybe the data just does not cluster well with the methods selected at all. Basically, the ramification we saw was that our results are not much better than random when applying clustering to the data preprocessing. Finally, it is important to ensure a feedback loop is in place to continuously collect the same data in the same format from which the models were created. This feedback loop can be used to measure the model real world effectiveness and also to continue to revise the models from time to time as things change.

Context

To make this a seamless process, I cleaned the data and delete many variables that I thought were not important to our dataset. I then uploaded all of those files to Kaggle for each of you to download. The rideshare_data has both lyft and uber but it is still a cleaned version from the dataset we downloaded from Kaggle.

Use of Data Files

You can easily subset the data into the car types that you will be modeling by first loading the csv into R, here is the code for how you do this:

This loads the file into R

df<-read.csv('uber.csv')

The next codes is to subset the data into specific car types. The example below only has Uber 'Black' car types.

df_black<-subset(uber_df, uber_df$name == 'Black')

This next portion of code will be to load it into R. First, we must write this dataframe into a csv file on our computer in order to load it into R.

write.csv(df_black, "nameofthefileyouwanttosaveas.csv")

The file will appear in you working directory. If you are not familiar with your working directory. Run this code:

getwd()

The output will be the file path to your working directory. You will find the file you just created in that folder.

Inspiration

Your data will be in front of the world's largest data science community. What questions do you want to see answered?

Full title: Mining Distance-Based Outliers in Near Linear Time with Randomization and a Simple Pruning Rule Abstract: Defining outliers by their distance to neighboring examples is a popular approach to finding unusual examples in a data set. Recently, much work has been conducted with the goal of finding fast algorithms for this task. We show that a simple nested loop algorithm that in the worst case is quadratic can give near linear time performance when the data is in random order and a simple pruning rule is used. We test our algorithm on real high-dimensional data sets with millions of examples and show that the near linear scaling holds over several orders of magnitude. Our average case analysis suggests that much of the efficiency is because the time to process non-outliers, which are the majority of examples, does not depend on the size of the data set.

Market Basket Analysis

Market basket analysis with Apriori algorithm

The retailer wants to target customers with suggestions on itemset that a customer is most likely to purchase .I was given dataset contains data of a retailer; the transaction data provides data around all the transactions that have happened over a period of time. Retailer will use result to grove in his industry and provide for customer suggestions on itemset, we be able increase customer engagement and improve customer experience and identify customer behavior. I will solve this problem with use Association Rules type of unsupervised learning technique that checks for the dependency of one data item on another data item.

Introduction

Association Rule is most used when you are planning to build association in different objects in a set. It works when you are planning to find frequent patterns in a transaction database. It can tell you what items do customers frequently buy together and it allows retailer to identify relationships between the items.

An Example of Association Rules

Assume there are 100 customers, 10 of them bought Computer Mouth, 9 bought Mat for Mouse and 8 bought both of them. - bought Computer Mouth => bought Mat for Mouse - support = P(Mouth & Mat) = 8/100 = 0.08 - confidence = support/P(Mat for Mouse) = 0.08/0.09 = 0.89 - lift = confidence/P(Computer Mouth) = 0.89/0.10 = 8.9 This just simple example. In practice, a rule needs the support of several hundred transactions, before it can be considered statistically significant, and datasets often contain thousands or millions of transactions.

Strategy

• Data Import
• Data Understanding and Exploration
• Transformation of the data – so that is ready to be consumed by the association rules algorithm
• Running association rules
• Exploring the rules generated
• Filtering the generated rules
• Visualization of Rule

Dataset Description

• File name: Assignment-1_Data
• List name: retaildata
• File format: . xlsx
• Number of Row: 522065

• Number of Attributes: 7

  • BillNo: 6-digit number assigned to each transaction. Nominal.
  • Itemname: Product name. Nominal.
  • Quantity: The quantities of each product per transaction. Numeric.
  • Date: The day and time when each transaction was generated. Numeric.
  • Price: Product price. Numeric.
  • CustomerID: 5-digit number assigned to each customer. Nominal.
  • Country: Name of the country where each customer resides. Nominal.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270162-fc53e5a3-4ad1-4d06-b0e0-228aabcf6b70.png">

Libraries in R

First, we need to load required libraries. Shortly I describe all libraries.

• arules - Provides the infrastructure for representing, manipulating and analyzing transaction data and patterns (frequent itemsets and association rules).
• arulesViz - Extends package 'arules' with various visualization. techniques for association rules and item-sets. The package also includes several interactive visualizations for rule exploration.
• tidyverse - The tidyverse is an opinionated collection of R packages designed for data science.
• readxl - Read Excel Files in R.
• plyr - Tools for Splitting, Applying and Combining Data.
• ggplot2 - A system for 'declaratively' creating graphics, based on "The Grammar of Graphics". You provide the data, tell 'ggplot2' how to map variables to aesthetics, what graphical primitives to use, and it takes care of the details.
• knitr - Dynamic Report generation in R.
• magrittr- Provides a mechanism for chaining commands with a new forward-pipe operator, %>%. This operator will forward a value, or the result of an expression, into the next function call/expression. There is flexible support for the type of right-hand side expressions.
• dplyr - A fast, consistent tool for working with data frame like objects, both in memory and out of memory.
• tidyverse - This package is designed to make it easy to install and load multiple 'tidyverse' packages in a single step.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270210-49c8e1aa-9753-431b-a8d5-99601bc76cb5.png">

Data Pre-processing

Next, we need to upload Assignment-1_Data. xlsx to R to read the dataset.Now we can see our data in R.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270229-514f0983-3bbb-4cd3-be64-980e92656a02.png"> https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270251-6f6f6472-8817-435c-a995-9bc4bfef10d1.png">

After we will clear our data frame, will remove missing values.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/91852182/145270286-05854e1a-2b6c-490e-ab30-9e99e731eacb.png">

To apply Association Rule mining, we need to convert dataframe into transaction data to make all items that are bought together in one invoice will be in ...

This file includes all synthetic data examples in this manuscript. (ZIP)

The complete dataset used in the analysis comprises 36 samples, each described by 11 numeric features and 1 target. The attributes considered were caspase 3/7 activity, Mitotracker red CMXRos area and intensity (3 h and 24 h incubations with both compounds), Mitosox oxidation (3 h incubation with the referred compounds) and oxidation rate, DCFDA fluorescence (3 h and 24 h incubations with either compound) and oxidation rate, and DQ BSA hydrolysis. The target of each instance corresponds to one of the 9 possible classes (4 samples per class): Control, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µM for 6-OHDA and 0.03, 0.06, 0.125 and 0.25 µM for rotenone. The dataset is balanced, it does not contain any missing values and data was standardized across features. The small number of samples prevented a full and strong statistical analysis of the results. Nevertheless, it allowed the identification of relevant hidden patterns and trends.

Exploratory data analysis, information gain, hierarchical clustering, and supervised predictive modeling were performed using Orange Data Mining version 3.25.1 [41]. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the Euclidean distance metric and weighted linkage. Cluster maps were plotted to relate the features with higher mutual information (in rows) with instances (in columns), with the color of each cell representing the normalized level of a particular feature in a specific instance. The information is grouped both in rows and in columns by a two-way hierarchical clustering method using the Euclidean distances and average linkage. Stratified cross-validation was used to train the supervised decision tree. A set of preliminary empirical experiments were performed to choose the best parameters for each algorithm, and we verified that, within moderate variations, there were no significant changes in the outcome. The following settings were adopted for the decision tree algorithm: minimum number of samples in leaves: 2; minimum number of samples required to split an internal node: 5; stop splitting when majority reaches: 95%; criterion: gain ratio. The performance of the supervised model was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure and area under the ROC curve (AUC) metrics.

The SPHERE is students' performance in physics education research dataset. It is presented as a multi-domain learning dataset of students’ performance on physics that has been collected through several research-based assessments (RBAs) established by the physics education research (PER) community. A total of 497 eleventh-grade students were involved from three large and a small public high school located in a suburban district of a high-populated province in Indonesia. Some variables related to demographics, accessibility to literature resources, and students’ physics identity are also investigated. Some RBAs utilized in this data were selected based on concepts learned by the students in the Indonesian physics curriculum. We commenced the survey of students’ understanding on Newtonian mechanics at the end of the first semester using Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation (FMCE). In the second semester, we assessed the students’ scientific abilities and learning attitude through Scientific Abilities Assessment Rubrics (SAAR) and the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) respectively. The conceptual assessments were continued at the second semester measured through Rotational and Rolling Motion Conceptual Survey (RRMCS), Fluid Mechanics Concept Inventory (FMCI), Mechanical Waves Conceptual Survey (MWCS), Thermal Concept Evaluation (TCE), and Survey of Thermodynamic Processes and First and Second Laws (STPFaSL). We expect SPHERE could be a valuable dataset for supporting the advancement of the PER field particularly in quantitative studies. For example, there is a need to help advance research on using machine learning and data mining techniques in PER that might face challenges due to the unavailable dataset for the specific purpose of PER studies. SPHERE can be reused as a students’ performance dataset on physics specifically dedicated for PER scholars which might be willing to implement machine learning techniques in physics education.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Data Mining Software market size will be USD XX million in 2025. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of XX% from 2025 to 2031.

North America held the major market share for more than XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Europe accounted for a market share of over XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Asia Pacific held a market share of around XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Latin America had a market share of more than XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Middle East and Africa had a market share of around XX% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. KEY DRIVERS

Increasing Focus on Customer Satisfaction to Drive Data Mining Software Market Growth

In today’s hyper-competitive and digitally connected marketplace, customer satisfaction has emerged as a critical factor for business sustainability and growth. The growing focus on enhancing customer satisfaction is proving to be a significant driver in the expansion of the data mining software market. Organizations are increasingly leveraging data mining tools to sift through vast volumes of customer data—ranging from transactional records and website activity to social media engagement and call center logs—to uncover insights that directly influence customer experience strategies. Data mining software empowers companies to analyze customer behavior patterns, identify dissatisfaction triggers, and predict future preferences. Through techniques such as classification, clustering, and association rule mining, businesses can break down large datasets to understand what customers want, what they are likely to purchase next, and how they feel about the brand. These insights not only help in refining customer service but also in shaping product development, pricing strategies, and promotional campaigns. For instance, Netflix uses data mining to recommend personalized content by analyzing a user's viewing history, ratings, and preferences. This has led to increased user engagement and retention, highlighting how a deep understanding of customer preferences—made possible through data mining—can translate into competitive advantage. Moreover, companies are increasingly using these tools to create highly targeted and customer-specific marketing campaigns. By mining data from e-commerce transactions, browsing behavior, and demographic profiles, brands can tailor their offerings and communications to suit individual customer segments. For Instance Amazon continuously mines customer purchasing and browsing data to deliver personalized product recommendations, tailored promotions, and timely follow-ups. This not only enhances customer satisfaction but also significantly boosts conversion rates and average order value. According to a report by McKinsey, personalization can deliver five to eight times the ROI on marketing spend and lift sales by 10% or more—a powerful incentive for companies to adopt data mining software as part of their customer experience toolkit. (Source: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/personalizing-at-scale#/) The utility of data mining tools extends beyond e-commerce and streaming platforms. In the banking and financial services industry, for example, institutions use data mining to analyze customer feedback, call center transcripts, and usage data to detect pain points and improve service delivery. Bank of America, for instance, utilizes data mining and predictive analytics to monitor customer interactions and provide proactive service suggestions or fraud alerts, significantly improving user satisfaction and trust. (Source: https://futuredigitalfinance.wbresearch.com/blog/bank-of-americas-erica-client-interactions-future-ai-in-banking) Similarly, telecom companies like Vodafone use data mining to understand customer churn behavior and implement retention strategies based on insights drawn from service usage patterns and complaint histories. In addition to p...

Performance of the “Training Data Set” using the classification algorithm J48.

The LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus)

April 2020 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk) Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny MirkesThe data are extracted from the Web of Science [1]. You may not copy or distribute these data in whole or in part without the written consent of Clarivate Analytics.[Version 2] A further cleaning is applied in Data Processing for LSC Abstracts in Version 1*. Details of cleaning procedure are explained in Step 6.* Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v1.Getting StartedThis text provides the information on the LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) and pre-processing steps on abstracts, and describes the structure of files to organise the corpus. This corpus is created to be used in future work on the quantification of the meaning of research texts and make it available for use in Natural Language Processing projects.LSC is a collection of abstracts of articles and proceeding papers published in 2014, and indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) database [1]. The corpus contains only documents in English. Each document in the corpus contains the following parts:1. Authors: The list of authors of the paper2. Title: The title of the paper 3. Abstract: The abstract of the paper 4. Categories: One or more category from the list of categories [2]. Full list of categories is presented in file ‘List_of _Categories.txt’. 5. Research Areas: One or more research area from the list of research areas [3]. Full list of research areas is presented in file ‘List_of_Research_Areas.txt’. 6. Total Times cited: The number of times the paper was cited by other items from all databases within Web of Science platform [4] 7. Times cited in Core Collection: The total number of times the paper was cited by other papers within the WoS Core Collection [4]The corpus was collected in July 2018 online and contains the number of citations from publication date to July 2018. We describe a document as the collection of information (about a paper) listed above. The total number of documents in LSC is 1,673,350.Data ProcessingStep 1: Downloading of the Data Online

The dataset is collected manually by exporting documents as Tab-delimitated files online. All documents are available online.Step 2: Importing the Dataset to R

The LSC was collected as TXT files. All documents are extracted to R.Step 3: Cleaning the Data from Documents with Empty Abstract or without CategoryAs our research is based on the analysis of abstracts and categories, all documents with empty abstracts and documents without categories are removed.Step 4: Identification and Correction of Concatenate Words in AbstractsEspecially medicine-related publications use ‘structured abstracts’. Such type of abstracts are divided into sections with distinct headings such as introduction, aim, objective, method, result, conclusion etc. Used tool for extracting abstracts leads concatenate words of section headings with the first word of the section. For instance, we observe words such as ConclusionHigher and ConclusionsRT etc. The detection and identification of such words is done by sampling of medicine-related publications with human intervention. Detected concatenate words are split into two words. For instance, the word ‘ConclusionHigher’ is split into ‘Conclusion’ and ‘Higher’.The section headings in such abstracts are listed below:

Background Method(s) Design Theoretical Measurement(s) Location Aim(s) Methodology Process Abstract Population Approach Objective(s) Purpose(s) Subject(s) Introduction Implication(s) Patient(s) Procedure(s) Hypothesis Measure(s) Setting(s) Limitation(s) Discussion Conclusion(s) Result(s) Finding(s) Material (s) Rationale(s) Implications for health and nursing policyStep 5: Extracting (Sub-setting) the Data Based on Lengths of AbstractsAfter correction, the lengths of abstracts are calculated. ‘Length’ indicates the total number of words in the text, calculated by the same rule as for Microsoft Word ‘word count’ [5].According to APA style manual [6], an abstract should contain between 150 to 250 words. In LSC, we decided to limit length of abstracts from 30 to 500 words in order to study documents with abstracts of typical length ranges and to avoid the effect of the length to the analysis.

Step 6: [Version 2] Cleaning Copyright Notices, Permission polices, Journal Names and Conference Names from LSC Abstracts in Version 1Publications can include a footer of copyright notice, permission policy, journal name, licence, author’s right or conference name below the text of abstract by conferences and journals. Used tool for extracting and processing abstracts in WoS database leads to attached such footers to the text. For example, our casual observation yields that copyright notices such as ‘Published by Elsevier ltd.’ is placed in many texts. To avoid abnormal appearances of words in further analysis of words such as bias in frequency calculation, we performed a cleaning procedure on such sentences and phrases in abstracts of LSC version 1. We removed copyright notices, names of conferences, names of journals, authors’ rights, licenses and permission policies identified by sampling of abstracts.Step 7: [Version 2] Re-extracting (Sub-setting) the Data Based on Lengths of AbstractsThe cleaning procedure described in previous step leaded to some abstracts having less than our minimum length criteria (30 words). 474 texts were removed.Step 8: Saving the Dataset into CSV FormatDocuments are saved into 34 CSV files. In CSV files, the information is organised with one record on each line and parts of abstract, title, list of authors, list of categories, list of research areas, and times cited is recorded in fields.To access the LSC for research purposes, please email to ns433@le.ac.uk.References[1]Web of Science. (15 July). Available: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/ [2]WoS Subject Categories. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS56B5/help/WOS/hp_subject_category_terms_tasca.html [3]Research Areas in WoS. Available: https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca.html [4]Times Cited in WoS Core Collection. (15 July). Available: https://support.clarivate.com/ScientificandAcademicResearch/s/article/Web-of-Science-Times-Cited-accessibility-and-variation?language=en_US [5]Word Count. Available: https://support.office.com/en-us/article/show-word-count-3c9e6a11-a04d-43b4-977c-563a0e0d5da3 [6]A. P. Association, Publication manual. American Psychological Association Washington, DC, 1983.

This is the dataset for the paper "Fast and Accurate Data-Driven Goal Recognition Using Process Mining Techniques." Including a running example, evaluation dataset for synthetic domains, and real-world business logs.

The dataset consists of three folders:Systems: Three public event logs: Sepsis Cases, RTFMS, and BPIC 2012.Logs: Clean and noisy logs derived from the base systems.From each base log, we created samples of seven sizes (1000, 2000, 4000, 10000, 20000, 40000, 100000 traces) using sampling with replacement, yielding 21 clean logs.Noise was then added using $\snip$ across seven intensity levels (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.4%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 4.0%, 10.0%) and five noise types (absence, insertion, ordering, substitution, mixed). Percentages refer to the number of trace-level injections.Each configuration was repeated five times, producing 3,675 noisy logs and a total of 3,696 logs.Models: Contains discovered models for all clean logs and a random subset of noisy logs (incomplete), using the Alpha, Heuristics, and Inductive miners.

this graph was created in Loocker studio,PowerBi and Tableau:

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2Ff35dd0bdb2f87ea2badf1ea1d57086bc%2Fgraph1.jpg?generation=1718398785729815&alt=media" alt=""> https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F52689afbe7380af61e578767366ac925%2Fgraph2.jpg?generation=1718398791128270&alt=media" alt=""> https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F992bd2cc851499b2f8f0bcb34732fab7%2Fgraph3.png?generation=1718398796130065&alt=media" alt="">

Abstract We propose a data mining approach to predict human wine taste preferences that is based on easily available analytical tests at the certification step. A large dataset (when compared to other studies in this domain) is considered, with white and red vinho verde samples (from Portugal). Three regression techniques were applied, under a computationally efficient procedure that performs simultaneous variable and model selection. The support vector machine achieved promising results, outperforming the multiple regression and neural network methods. Such model is useful to support the oenologist wine tasting evaluations and improve wine production. Furthermore, similar techniques can help in target marketing by modeling consumer tastes from niche markets.

Introduction Once viewed as a luxury good, nowadays wine is increasingly enjoyed by a wider range of consumers. Portugal is a top ten wine exporting country, with 3.17% of the market share in 2005 [11]. Exports of its vinho verde wine (from the northwest region) have increased by 36% from 1997 to 2007 [8]. To support its growth, the wine industry is investing in new technologies for both wine making and selling processes. Wine certification and quality assessment are key elements within this context. Certification prevents the illegal adulteration of wines (to safeguard human health) and assures quality for the wine market. Quality evaluation is often part of the certification process and can be used to improve wine making (by identifying the most influential factors) and to stratify wines such as premium brands (useful for setting prices).

Journal of Computational Design and Engineering Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Journal of Computational Design and Engineering is an international journal that aims to provide academia and industry with a venue for rapid publication of research papers reporting innovative computational methods and applications to achieve a major breakthrough, practical improvements, and bold new research directions within a wide range of design and engineering: Theory and its progress in computational advancement for design and engineering Development of computational framework to support large scale design and engineering Interaction issues among human, designed artifacts, and systems Knowledge-intensive technologies for intelligent and sustainable systems Emerging technology and convergence of technology fields presented with convincing design examples Educational issues for academia, practitioners, and future generation Proposal on new research directions as well as survey and retrospectives on mature field. Examples of relevant topics include traditional and emerging issues in design and engineering but are not limited to: Field specific issues in mechanical, aerospace, shipbuilding, industrial, architectural, plant, and civil engineering as well as industrial design Geometric modeling and processing, solid and heterogeneous modeling, computational geometry, features, and virtual prototyping Computer graphics, virtual and augmented reality, and scientific visualization Human modeling and engineering, user interaction and experience, HCI, HMI, human-vehicle interaction(HVI), cognitive engineering, and human factors and ergonomics with computers Knowledge-based engineering, intelligent CAD, AI and machine learning in design, and ontology Product data exchange and management, PDM/PLM/CPC, PDX/PDQ, interoperability, data mining, and database issues Design theory and methodology, sustainable design and engineering, concurrent engineering, and collaborative engineering Digital/virtual manufacturing, rapid prototyping and tooling, and CNC machining Computer aided inspection, geometric and engineering tolerancing, and reverse engineering Finite element analysis, optimization, meshes and discretization, and virtual engineering Bio-CAD, Nano-CAD, and medical applications Industrial design, aesthetic design, new media, and design education Survey and benchmark reports

The comma separated value dataset contains process data from a production process, including data on cases, activities, resources, timestamps and more data fields.

Full title: Mining Distance-Based Outliers in Near Linear Time with Randomization and a Simple Pruning Rule Abstract: Defining outliers by their distance to neighboring examples is a popular approach to finding unusual examples in a data set. Recently, much work has been conducted with the goal of finding fast algorithms for this task. We show that a simple nested loop algorithm that in the worst case is quadratic can give near linear time performance when the data is in random order and a simple pruning rule is used. We test our algorithm on real high-dimensional data sets with millions of examples and show that the near linear scaling holds over several orders of magnitude. Our average case analysis suggests that much of the efficiency is because the time to process non-outliers, which are the majority of examples, does not depend on the size of the data set.

Data The input data will be given:

Archive with task data; train.csv - training images annotations; train_images / - folder with training images; 5_15_2_vocab.json - decoding of the attributes at the 5_15_2 sign.

The annotations contain fields:

filename - path to the signed image; label - the class label for the sign on the image. Note! The characters 3_24, 3_25, 5_15_2, 5_31 and 6_2 have separate attributes. These attributes in the label field are separated by a "+" character, for example, 3_24 + 100. For sign 5_15_2, the attribute is the direction of the arrow, for the remaining signs, the attribute is the numbers on the sign.

This dataset was created to investigate the impact of data collection modes and pre-processing techniques on the quality of free comment data related to consumers' sensory perceptions. A total of 200 consumers were recruited and divided into two groups of 100. Each group evaluated six madeleine samples (five distinct samples and one replicate) in a controlled sensory analysis laboratory, using different free comment data collection modes. Consumers in the first group provided only words or short expressions, while those in the second group used complete sentences. Additionally, participants reported their liking for each sample.

LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary)April 2020 by Neslihan Suzen, PhD student at the University of Leicester (ns433@leicester.ac.uk/suzenneslihan@hotmail.com)Supervised by Prof Alexander Gorban and Dr Evgeny Mirkes[Version 3] The third version of LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary) is created from the updated LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) - Version 2*. All pre-processing steps applied to build the new version of the dictionary are the same as in Version 2** and can be found in description of Version 2 below. We did not repeat the explanation. After pre-processing steps, the total number of unique words in the new version of the dictionary is 972,060. The files provided with this description are also same as described as for LScD Version 2 below.* Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v2** Suzen, Neslihan (2019): LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary). figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9746900.v2[Version 2] Getting StartedThis document provides the pre-processing steps for creating an ordered list of words from the LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) [1] and the description of LScD (Leicester Scientific Dictionary). This dictionary is created to be used in future work on the quantification of the meaning of research texts. R code for producing the dictionary from LSC and instructions for usage of the code are available in [2]. The code can be also used for list of texts from other sources, amendments to the code may be required.LSC is a collection of abstracts of articles and proceeding papers published in 2014 and indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) database [3]. Each document contains title, list of authors, list of categories, list of research areas, and times cited. The corpus contains only documents in English. The corpus was collected in July 2018 and contains the number of citations from publication date to July 2018. The total number of documents in LSC is 1,673,824.LScD is an ordered list of words from texts of abstracts in LSC.The dictionary stores 974,238 unique words, is sorted by the number of documents containing the word in descending order. All words in the LScD are in stemmed form of words. The LScD contains the following information:1.Unique words in abstracts2.Number of documents containing each word3.Number of appearance of a word in the entire corpusProcessing the LSCStep 1.Downloading the LSC Online: Use of the LSC is subject to acceptance of request of the link by email. To access the LSC for research purposes, please email to ns433@le.ac.uk. The data are extracted from Web of Science [3]. You may not copy or distribute these data in whole or in part without the written consent of Clarivate Analytics.Step 2.Importing the Corpus to R: The full R code for processing the corpus can be found in the GitHub [2].All following steps can be applied for arbitrary list of texts from any source with changes of parameter. The structure of the corpus such as file format and names (also the position) of fields should be taken into account to apply our code. The organisation of CSV files of LSC is described in README file for LSC [1].Step 3.Extracting Abstracts and Saving Metadata: Metadata that include all fields in a document excluding abstracts and the field of abstracts are separated. Metadata are then saved as MetaData.R. Fields of metadata are: List_of_Authors, Title, Categories, Research_Areas, Total_Times_Cited and Times_cited_in_Core_Collection.Step 4.Text Pre-processing Steps on the Collection of Abstracts: In this section, we presented our approaches to pre-process abstracts of the LSC.1.Removing punctuations and special characters: This is the process of substitution of all non-alphanumeric characters by space. We did not substitute the character “-” in this step, because we need to keep words like “z-score”, “non-payment” and “pre-processing” in order not to lose the actual meaning of such words. A processing of uniting prefixes with words are performed in later steps of pre-processing.2.Lowercasing the text data: Lowercasing is performed to avoid considering same words like “Corpus”, “corpus” and “CORPUS” differently. Entire collection of texts are converted to lowercase.3.Uniting prefixes of words: Words containing prefixes joined with character “-” are united as a word. The list of prefixes united for this research are listed in the file “list_of_prefixes.csv”. The most of prefixes are extracted from [4]. We also added commonly used prefixes: ‘e’, ‘extra’, ‘per’, ‘self’ and ‘ultra’.4.Substitution of words: Some of words joined with “-” in the abstracts of the LSC require an additional process of substitution to avoid losing the meaning of the word before removing the character “-”. Some examples of such words are “z-test”, “well-known” and “chi-square”. These words have been substituted to “ztest”, “wellknown” and “chisquare”. Identification of such words is done by sampling of abstracts form LSC. The full list of such words and decision taken for substitution are presented in the file “list_of_substitution.csv”.5.Removing the character “-”: All remaining character “-” are replaced by space.6.Removing numbers: All digits which are not included in a word are replaced by space. All words that contain digits and letters are kept because alphanumeric characters such as chemical formula might be important for our analysis. Some examples are “co2”, “h2o” and “21st”.7.Stemming: Stemming is the process of converting inflected words into their word stem. This step results in uniting several forms of words with similar meaning into one form and also saving memory space and time [5]. All words in the LScD are stemmed to their word stem.8.Stop words removal: Stop words are words that are extreme common but provide little value in a language. Some common stop words in English are ‘I’, ‘the’, ‘a’ etc. We used ‘tm’ package in R to remove stop words [6]. There are 174 English stop words listed in the package.Step 5.Writing the LScD into CSV Format: There are 1,673,824 plain processed texts for further analysis. All unique words in the corpus are extracted and written in the file “LScD.csv”.The Organisation of the LScDThe total number of words in the file “LScD.csv” is 974,238. Each field is described below:Word: It contains unique words from the corpus. All words are in lowercase and their stem forms. The field is sorted by the number of documents that contain words in descending order.Number of Documents Containing the Word: In this content, binary calculation is used: if a word exists in an abstract then there is a count of 1. If the word exits more than once in a document, the count is still 1. Total number of document containing the word is counted as the sum of 1s in the entire corpus.Number of Appearance in Corpus: It contains how many times a word occurs in the corpus when the corpus is considered as one large document.Instructions for R CodeLScD_Creation.R is an R script for processing the LSC to create an ordered list of words from the corpus [2]. Outputs of the code are saved as RData file and in CSV format. Outputs of the code are:Metadata File: It includes all fields in a document excluding abstracts. Fields are List_of_Authors, Title, Categories, Research_Areas, Total_Times_Cited and Times_cited_in_Core_Collection.File of Abstracts: It contains all abstracts after pre-processing steps defined in the step 4.DTM: It is the Document Term Matrix constructed from the LSC[6]. Each entry of the matrix is the number of times the word occurs in the corresponding document.LScD: An ordered list of words from LSC as defined in the previous section.The code can be used by:1.Download the folder ‘LSC’, ‘list_of_prefixes.csv’ and ‘list_of_substitution.csv’2.Open LScD_Creation.R script3.Change parameters in the script: replace with the full path of the directory with source files and the full path of the directory to write output files4.Run the full code.References[1]N. Suzen. (2019). LSC (Leicester Scientific Corpus) [Dataset]. Available: https://doi.org/10.25392/leicester.data.9449639.v1[2]N. Suzen. (2019). LScD-LEICESTER SCIENTIFIC DICTIONARY CREATION. Available: https://github.com/neslihansuzen/LScD-LEICESTER-SCIENTIFIC-DICTIONARY-CREATION[3]Web of Science. (15 July). Available: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/[4]A. Thomas, "Common Prefixes, Suffixes and Roots," Center for Development and Learning, 2013.[5]C. Ramasubramanian and R. Ramya, "Effective pre-processing activities in text mining using improved porter’s stemming algorithm," International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 4536-4538, 2013.[6]I. Feinerer, "Introduction to the tm Package Text Mining in R," Accessible en ligne: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tm/vignettes/tm.pdf, 2013.

In response to NASA SBIR topic A1.05, "Data Mining for Integrated Vehicle Health Management", Michigan Aerospace Corporation (MAC) asserts that our unique SPADE (Sparse Processing Applied to Data Exploitation) technology meets a significant fraction of the stated criteria and has functionality that enables it to handle many applications within the aircraft lifecycle. SPADE distills input data into highly quantized features and uses MAC's novel techniques for constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees to develop extremely accurate diagnostic/prognostic models for classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection and semi-supervised learning tasks. These techniques are currently being employed to do Threat Assessment for satellites in conjunction with researchers at the Air Force Research Lab. Significant advantages to this approach include: 1) completely data driven; 2) training and evaluation are faster than conventional methods; 3) operates effectively on huge datasets (> billion samples X > million features), 4) proven to be as accurate as state-of-the-art techniques in many significant real-world applications. The specific goals for Phase 1 will be to work with domain experts at NASA and with our partners Boeing, SpaceX and GMV Space Systems to delineate a subset of problems that are particularly well-suited to this approach and to determine requirements for deploying algorithms on platforms of opportunity.