74 datasets found
  1. Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]

    • data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Jun 17, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2021). Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209] [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/ecosystem-restoration-program-ds209
    Explore at:
    kml, zip, geojson, csv, arcgis geoservices rest api, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 17, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This layer contains the locations of ongoing and completed habitat restoration projects funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program, and contained as a subset of the California Habitat Restoration Project Database (CHRPD). Project locations are georeferenced by heads-up digitizing in as much detail as possible based on maps submitted by grant recipients. A background layer of 1:24,000 DRG Quads was used to locate the projects precisely. WHAT EACH RECORD REPRESENTS: The records represent individual project sites of a completed or ongoing restoration project funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program through 2008. Many of the projects have multiple sites. Each site is represented by a center point. A separate shapefile records the entire footprint of those sites in this shapefile that occur over a larger area, and is available on request.

  2. A

    GIS dataset of candidate terrestrial ecological restoration areas for the...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 24, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States (2022). GIS dataset of candidate terrestrial ecological restoration areas for the United States [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.23719/1375934
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 24, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    United States
    License

    https://pasteur.epa.gov/license/sciencehub-license.htmlhttps://pasteur.epa.gov/license/sciencehub-license.html

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    A vector GIS dataset of candidate areas for terrestrial ecological restoration based on landscape context. The dataset was created using NLCD 2011 (www.mrlc.gov) and morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) (http://forest.jrc.ec.europa.eu/download/software/guidos/mspa/). There are 13 attributes for the polygons in the dataset, including presence and length of roads, candidate area size, size of surround contiguous natural areas, soil productivity, presence and length of road, areas suitable for wetland restoration, and others.

    This dataset is associated with the following publication: Wickham, J., K. Riiters, P. Vogt, J. Costanza, and A. Neale. An inventory of continental U.S. terrestrial candidate ecological restoration areas based on landscape context. RESTORATION ECOLOGY. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA, 25(6): 894-902, (2017).

  3. Documenting Habitat Restoration through Acoustic Monitoring - Dataset - NFWF...

    • resiliencedata.nfwf.org
    Updated May 23, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    resiliencedata.nfwf.org (2023). Documenting Habitat Restoration through Acoustic Monitoring - Dataset - NFWF Coastal Resilience Open Data Platform [Dataset]. https://resiliencedata.nfwf.org/dataset/documenting-habitat-restoration-through-acoustic-monitoring
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundationhttp://www.nfwf.org/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Results obtained from monitoring activities using acoustic monitoring on forest restoration at HLENR.

  4. A

    ‘Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]’ analyzed by Analyst-2

    • analyst-2.ai
    Updated Jan 26, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com) (2022). ‘Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]’ analyzed by Analyst-2 [Dataset]. https://analyst-2.ai/analysis/data-gov-ecosystem-restoration-program-ds209-cc92/04562093/?iid=009-749&v=presentation
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 26, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com)
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Analysis of ‘Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/d504404e-48dd-4d5d-91da-ccb797c9b89e on 26 January 2022.

    --- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

    This layer contains the locations of ongoing and completed habitat restoration projects funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program, and contained as a subset of the California Habitat Restoration Project Database (CHRPD). Project locations are georeferenced by heads-up digitizing in as much detail as possible based on maps submitted by grant recipients. A background layer of 1:24,000 DRG Quads was used to locate the projects precisely. WHAT EACH RECORD REPRESENTS: The records represent individual project sites of a completed or ongoing restoration project funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program through 2008. Many of the projects have multiple sites. Each site is represented by a center point. A separate shapefile records the entire footprint of those sites in this shapefile that occur over a larger area, and is available on request.

    --- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

  5. Northern Tablelands Koala Habitat Restoration Project

    • gbif.org
    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT - Environment and Heritage (2025). Northern Tablelands Koala Habitat Restoration Project [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15468/ushbmp
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Global Biodiversity Information Facilityhttps://www.gbif.org/
    DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT - Environment and Heritage
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Northern Tablelands region of New South Wales has a long history of vegetation restoration programs. However, there is no central repository for documenting these efforts. This project has been established to address that need. The format and content were developed by experienced ecological restoration practitioners. Data acquired on the location and characteristics of restoration sites, the work undertaken at the sites and the outcomes achieved create an information base for coordinating and planning large-scale restoration programs, and provide data for summarising and analysing restoration work at different spatial and temporal scales. Data is entered into standard forms. The Site Information and Work Details form captures characteristics of work sites and details the on-ground restoration activities conducted at the sites. A second data form, currently in development, will log the results of site monitoring programs. The data entry templates developed for this project are available to ALA BioCollect Ecoscience Projects in other regions and with other vegetation restoration goals. Assistance with navigating the project and entering data is available in the User Guide which can be found in the Resources page. The project is funded by the NSW Koala Strategy.

  6. d

    Yakima Spring Chinook redds - Assessing the efficacy of acclimation sites...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • fisheries.noaa.gov
    • +2more
    Updated May 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (Point of Contact, Custodian) (2025). Yakima Spring Chinook redds - Assessing the efficacy of acclimation sites and habitat quality and quantity for supplementation success: tradeoffs between homing and spawning site selection [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/yakima-spring-chinook-redds-assessing-the-efficacy-of-acclimation-sites-and-habitat-quality-and2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    (Point of Contact, Custodian)
    Description

    The Federal Columbia River Power Supply (FCRPS) Biological Opinion (BiOp) calls for studies that estimate ecological and genetic impacts of hatchery fish on wild populations, and evaluate the effectiveness of hatchery supplementation measures to reduce potentially harmful effects of artificial production to aid recovery through hatchery reform. The FCRPS BiOp further explicitly calls for studies that examine the appropriate role of supplementation and the relationship between supplementation and habitat actions in salmon recovery. A basic premise of supplementation is that artificially produced fish will help develop self-sustaining spawning populations both by increasing current natural production and reestablishing populations in underutilized and recovered habitats. One hatchery reform measure that has been incorporated into many supplementation programs throughout the Columbia River Basin is the use of satellite acclimation facilities to repopulate underutilized habitat. However, the efficacy of these facilities in re-establishing naturally spawning populations and minimizing negative interactions between wild spawners and supplemented fish has not been established. Our studies have involved comprehensive carcass and redd mapping surveys and radio telemetry to examine the role of acclimation sites in homing and spawning of spring Chinook salmon released as part of the Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project (YKFP) supplementation program. In addition, we are examining the complex linkages between habitat quality and spawning site selection in supplemented Columbia River populations. These studies involve mapping and assessing habitat distribution and quality relative to supplementation rearing and release facilities, and coupling these findings to ongoing analysis of homing and spawning patterns. Our results have provided unique insights into the process of homing, straying, and spawning site selection, interactions and success of hatchery and wild spawners, and the efficacy of supplementation and acclimation sites in salmon recovery. These studies will help identify appropriate locations for recovery-related supplementation rearing and release facilities (acclimation sites), and ultimately allow us to develop scenario models predicting the spatial distribution of spawning relative to proposed supplementation facilities and available habitat (including future habitat restoration sites). The work is being conducted by Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC) scientists collaborating with the University of Washington, Yakima Nation, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Products for this project include annual reports, peer-reviewed publications, presentation of results at local and national meetings, and consultation with the Northwest Regional Office (NWR) and supplementation managers. Comprehensive GIS data of Yakima River Spring Chinook redds.

  7. Data from: Structure and function of restored and natural salt marshes:...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • search.dataone.org
    • +2more
    zip
    Updated Aug 29, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sarah Crosby; David Hudson; Randall A. Hughes; Anna Bartholet; Kasey Burns; Mary Donato; Devan Healy; Rebha Raviraj; Katherine Sperry; Nicole Spiller; Justin Susarchick (2024). Structure and function of restored and natural salt marshes: Implications for ecosystem resilience and adaptive potential [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rjdfn2zmd
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 29, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Northeastern University
    The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk
    HDR
    Harbor Watch at Earthplace
    Remote Ecologist
    Authors
    Sarah Crosby; David Hudson; Randall A. Hughes; Anna Bartholet; Kasey Burns; Mary Donato; Devan Healy; Rebha Raviraj; Katherine Sperry; Nicole Spiller; Justin Susarchick
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Description

    Salt marshes have ecological and economic value, but shoreline development, the increasing rate of sea-level rise, and other human impacts have caused significant loss of salt marshes. As a result, restoration of these ecosystems is widespread. For restoration and management to be effective, it is imperative to improve our understanding of marsh-building plants that serve as the ecological foundation of these habitats. Given the observed differences in characteristics between populations of smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora, restoration plantings may impact the biodiversity and resilience of restored ecosystems. Understanding differences in the structural and functional outcomes of active planting of restoration sites will enable the long-term success of restoration efforts to be improved. Natural and restored salt marshes in Long Island Sound were studied in 2021–2022 for S. alterniflora genetics, biomass, stem morphology, and faunal community composition. The average genotypic diversity of S. alterniflora was more than 4 times higher in restored than in natural marshes, and differentiation between each restored site and natural sites decreased with time. No difference was observed in live S. alterniflora belowground biomass; however, mean dead belowground biomass in natural marshes was more than 3 times greater than in restored marshes. Marsh platform invertebrates differed between the restored and natural sites, with natural marsh edge habitats having 9 times higher density of Geukensia demissa and 3 times as many crab burrows than in restored marshes, but there was no detected difference in species richness or abundance of nekton at high tide. With restoration practitioners seeking resilient, self-sustaining ecosystems, it is important to evaluate whether restored marsh characteristics are consistent with those goals and modify restoration planning accordingly to incorporate genetics, structure, and function. Methods Please see publication for full methodology: "Structure and function of restored and natural salt marshes: implications for ecosystem resilience and adaptive potential" (Estuaries and Coasts).

  8. Northern Rivers Koala Habitat Restoration Project

    • gbif.org
    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Jul 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT - Environment and Heritage (2025). Northern Rivers Koala Habitat Restoration Project [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15468/ckgeye
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Global Biodiversity Information Facilityhttps://www.gbif.org/
    DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT - Environment and Heritage
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Northern Rivers region of New South Wales has a long history of active and innovative vegetation restoration programs. However, there is no central repository for documenting these efforts. Participants in the Northern Rivers Koala Habitat Restoration Webinar in 2020 identified standardised data capture for restoration works as a priority action. This project has been developed to address that need. The format and content were developed by experienced ecological restoration practitioners. Data acquired on the location and characteristics of restoration sites, the work undertaken at the sites and the outcomes achieved create an information base for coordinating and planning large-scale restoration programs, and provide data for summarising and analysing restoration work at different spatial and temporal scales. Data is entered into standard forms. The Site Information and Work Details form captures characteristics of the work site and details the on-ground restoration activities conducted at the site. A second data form, currently in development, will log the results of site monitoring programs. The data entry templates developed for this project are available to ALA BioCollect Ecoscience Projects in other regions and with other vegetation restoration goals. Assistance with navigating the project and entering data is available in the User Guide which can be found in the Resources page. The project is jointly funded by American National Science Foundation Grant CNH-L: Dynamics of zoonotic systems: human-bat-pathogen interactions and the NSW Koala Strategy.

  9. Hunter Koala Habitat Restoration Project

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated May 16, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    BioCollect (2025). Hunter Koala Habitat Restoration Project [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/hunter-koala-habitat-restoration-project/2858208
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 16, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Atlas of Living Australiahttp://www.ala.org.au/
    Authors
    BioCollect
    Description

    The Hunter region of New South Wales has a history of active vegetation restoration programs. However, there is no central repository for documenting these efforts. This BioCollect project has been developed to address that need. The format and content were developed by experienced ecological restoration practitioners. Data acquired on the location and characteristics of restoration sites, the work undertaken at the sites and the outcomes achieved create an information base for coordinating and planning large-scale restoration programs, and provide data for summarising and analysing restoration work at different spatial and temporal scales. Data is entered into standard forms. The Site Information and Work Details form captures characteristics of the work site and details the on-ground restoration activities conducted at the site. Additional data forms log the progress of restoration work on individual sites and results of site monitoring programs. The data entry templates developed for this project are available to ALA BioCollect Ecoscience Projects in other regions and with other vegetation restoration goals. Assistance with navigating the project and entering data is available in the User Guide and associated documents which can be found in the Resources page. The project is funded by the NSW Koala Strategy.

  10. A

    ‘Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]’ analyzed by Analyst-2

    • analyst-2.ai
    Updated Jan 27, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com) (2022). ‘Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]’ analyzed by Analyst-2 [Dataset]. https://analyst-2.ai/analysis/data-gov-ecosystem-restoration-program-ds209-1efd/47379c0e/?iid=009-742&v=presentation
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 27, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com)
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Analysis of ‘Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/a5dc0b23-40a3-45a8-a285-dcbb0e4310eb on 27 January 2022.

    --- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

    This layer contains the locations of ongoing and completed habitat restoration projects funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program, and contained as a subset of the California Habitat Restoration Project Database (CHRPD). Project locations are georeferenced by heads-up digitizing in as much detail as possible based on maps submitted by grant recipients. A background layer of 1:24,000 DRG Quads was used to locate the projects precisely. WHAT EACH RECORD REPRESENTS: The records represent individual project sites of a completed or ongoing restoration project funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program through 2008. Many of the projects have multiple sites. Each site is represented by a center point. A separate shapefile records the entire footprint of those sites in this shapefile that occur over a larger area, and is available on request.

    --- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

  11. d

    Salmonid habitat use monitoring used to determine effectiveness of habitat...

    • search.dataone.org
    • portal.edirepository.org
    Updated Apr 17, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Amanda Banet (2021). Salmonid habitat use monitoring used to determine effectiveness of habitat improvement projects in the Sacramento River, CA [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/https%3A%2F%2Fpasta.lternet.edu%2Fpackage%2Fmetadata%2Feml%2Fedi%2F749%2F1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 17, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Environmental Data Initiative
    Authors
    Amanda Banet
    Time period covered
    Dec 8, 2015 - Jul 2, 2020
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    Sum, atu, date, days, flow, time, length, diptera, exuvium, habitat, and 62 more
    Description

    Overview The Central Valley Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) funds habitat improvement work in the Central Valley of California to increase salmonid populations in furtherance of meeting CVPIA fish doubling goals. This data package contains five datasets. Enclosure Study – Growth Data This dataset covers enclosure studies that examined salmonid growth rates in the Sacramento River and focused on assessing effectiveness of salmonid habitat improvement projects. Data was collected in July and August 2019 from project sites, constructed habitat project sites, and control sites where no treatment is planned. Six enclosures with juvenile Fall Run Chinook salmon from Coleman National Fish Hatchery were placed in each habitat type. Fish growth was tracked for approximately 6.5 weeks. Annual reports summarize the survey findings. Enclosure Study – Gut Contents Data This dataset covers enclosure studies that examined salmonid growth rates in the Sacramento River and focused on assessing effectiveness of salmonid habitat improvement projects. Data was collected in July and August 2019 from project sites, constructed habitat project sites, and control sites where no treatment is planned. Six enclosures with juvenile Fall Run Chinook salmon from Coleman National Fish Hatchery were placed in each habitat type. Enclosures remained in the river for approximately 6.5 weeks. At the end of the study, fish were euthanized, and we dissected their guts and enumerated the taxa found. Annual reports summarize the survey findings. Microhabitat Use Data This dataset covers salmonid microhabitat use conducted in the Sacramento River and focused on assessing effectiveness of salmonid habitat improvement projects. Surveys are conducted roughly monthly and include pre-project sites, constructed habitat project sites, and control sites where no treatment is planned. Based upon habitat inventory data, annually identify which habitat units within each side channel will be selected for the collection of habitat-use data. Habitats are randomly selected but stratified to include the full range of available habitat types to capture the range in depths and velocities present, at approximately equal surface areas each. Habitat selection attempts to capture the full range of microhabitat cover types identified from microhabitat mapping efforts. Snorkel surveys are conducted to achieve an abundance index, with the addition that when a selected habitat unit is encountered, the location of fish observed is marked with a weighted flag on the stream bottom. The species / run, and size of juvenile(s) and numbers observed at that location is recorded. After the selected habitat unit has been completely surveyed, flagged locations are revisited, and we collect habitat data specific to each of those sample points. Seining Data This dataset covers salmonid lengths, weights, and conditions collected via seining in the Sacramento River and focuses on assessing effectiveness of salmonid habitat improvement projects. Surveys are conducted roughly monthly and include pre-project sites, constructed habitat project sites, and control sites where no treatment is planned. Wandering pole seine and/or simple arc set beach seine methods were used to capture juvenile salmonids. Randomized sample locations within side channels for wandering pole seining were stratified by habitat type so that the range of available habitat type and quality were sampled. Beach seining methods were implemented at fixed sites. Mainstem sites were selected far enough away from side channels so that juvenile fish are not likely to be using both habitats. Snorkel Index Data This dataset covers salmonid observations conducted in the Sacramento River and focused on assessing effectiveness of salmonid habitat improvement projects. Surveys are conducted roughly every other week and include pre-project sites, constructed habitat project sites, and control sites where no treatment is planned. Sites are snorkeled by a crew of two to three people and all salmonids are counted by size category within pre-set survey reaches. Snorkelers record data on dive slates and then transcribe to paper data sheets and computer files. Annual reports summarize the survey findings.

  12. NSW Flying-Fox Habitat Restoration Program

    • gbif.org
    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Local Government NSW (2025). NSW Flying-Fox Habitat Restoration Program [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15468/q6zhh6
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Global Biodiversity Information Facilityhttps://www.gbif.org/
    Local Government NSW
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    New South Wales
    Description

    This project has been developed to provide a repository for documenting actions that restore and enhance camp and foraging habitat for flying-foxes under the LGNSW Flying-fox Habitat Restoration Program (FFHRP) at project sites across New South Wales. The format and content of the project and survey forms were developed by experienced ecological restoration practitioners in collaboration with the Atlas of Living Australia.

    Data acquired on the location and characteristics of restoration sites funded under the FFHRP, the work undertaken at the sites and the outcomes achieved create an information base for documenting and describing contributions to flying-fox conservation and management made by the FFHRP. As part of the NSW Habitat Restoration HUB, the data will assist with coordinating and planning large-scale restoration programs and provide data for summarising and analysing restoration work at different spatial and temporal scales. The Site Information and Work Details survey form captures characteristics of the work site and details the primary on-ground restoration activities conducted at the site. A second data form, currently in development, will log the results of site monitoring surveys. Assistance with navigating the project and entering data is available in the User Guide which can be found in the Resources page. The FFHRP has been assisted by the New South Wales Government through its Environmental Trust.

  13. a

    Restoring at Scale - Klamath River Restoration

    • klamath-data-management-platform-klamath.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 18, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Klamath River Restoration Project (2023). Restoring at Scale - Klamath River Restoration [Dataset]. https://klamath-data-management-platform-klamath.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/restoring-at-scale-klamath-river-restoration
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 18, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Klamath River Restoration Project
    Area covered
    Klamath River
    Description

    The Klamath River and its tributaries were once home to the third-largest salmon population in the West. Restoration follows the removal of four dams that will reopen access to more than 400 stream miles of historical anadromous fish habitat. Salmon and steelhead will once again have access to not only the Klamath, but also the Sprague, Williamson, and Wood Rivers of southern Oregon.RES will directly restore the areas in and around the four reservoir footprints. At the same time, we’ll be monitoring the river’s recovery over a much larger geographic area, reaching from the uppermost reservoir, created by the JC Boyle Dam in Oregon, all the way to the mouth of the Klamath River on the California coast.RES will revegetate thousands of acres of the former reservoir footprints. We’ll also restore several miles of high-priority tributaries, fully reopening a critical part of historical salmon and steelhead spawning habitats.RES is leading this restorative effort in close collaboration with state and federal agencies, conservation groups, and the Yurok, Klamath, Karuk, Hoopa, and other indigenous tribes who have stewarded this ecosystem for millennia.

  14. NE NSW Grey-headed Flying-fox Habitat Restoration Project

    • gbif.org
    • researchdata.edu.au
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GBIF (2025). NE NSW Grey-headed Flying-fox Habitat Restoration Project [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15468/ffb9q6
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Global Biodiversity Information Facilityhttps://www.gbif.org/
    Griffith University - Griffith Centre for Coastal Management
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The project has been developed to provide a repository for documenting actions that restore and enhance habitat critical for grey-headed flying-foxes in north-east New South Wales. The format and content were developed by experienced ecological restoration practitioners in collaboration with CSIRO Atlas of Living Australia. Data acquired on the location and characteristics of restoration sites, the work undertaken at the sites and the outcomes achieved create an information base for coordinating and planning large-scale restoration programs, and provide data for summarising and analysing restoration work at different spatial and temporal scales. Data is entered into standard forms. The Site Information and Work Details form captures characteristics of individual work sites and details ofs the primary on-ground restoration activities conducted at the sites. A second data form, currently in development, will log the results of site monitoring surveys. The data entry templates developed for this project are available to ALA BioCollect Ecoscience Projects in other regions and with other vegetation restoration goals. Assistance with navigating the project and entering data is available in the User Guide which can be found in the Resources page. The project is jointly funded by a Commonwealth Multiregional Bushfire Recovery Grant MSSPI000037, and an American National Science Foundation Grant CNH-L: Dynamics of zoonotic systems: human-bat-pathogen interactions. Those wishing to become members of this project and enter data should contact the Administrator.

  15. Solar Farm Habitat Restoration Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jul 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Solar Farm Habitat Restoration Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/solar-farm-habitat-restoration-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, csv, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Solar Farm Habitat Restoration Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global solar farm habitat restoration market size was valued at USD 1.34 billion in 2024, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.7% projected from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to reach USD 3.12 billion, reflecting the increasing integration of ecological restoration practices within the renewable energy sector. The market's growth is primarily driven by the growing realization among stakeholders regarding the dual benefits of solar energy production and ecological conservation, supported by evolving regulatory frameworks and heightened environmental awareness.




    One of the most significant growth factors propelling the solar farm habitat restoration market is the rising emphasis on biodiversity enhancement and ecosystem services. As solar installations continue to proliferate globally, concerns regarding their ecological footprint have intensified. This has led to a paradigm shift, with solar developers and utility companies prioritizing the restoration of native vegetation, pollinator habitats, and overall ecological balance on and around solar farms. Government policies and incentives aimed at promoting sustainable land management further amplify this trend, as agencies increasingly require or encourage habitat restoration as part of solar project permitting processes. The integration of habitat restoration not only mitigates negative environmental impacts but also enhances public acceptance and long-term land value, making it a strategic imperative for project developers.




    Technological advancements and innovative service offerings are also catalyzing the expansion of the solar farm habitat restoration market. The adoption of precision site assessment tools, drone-based monitoring, and data-driven restoration planning has significantly improved the efficiency and effectiveness of habitat restoration services. Companies are leveraging ecological expertise and digital platforms to tailor restoration strategies that are site-specific, cost-effective, and aligned with both environmental and energy production goals. These innovations are enabling stakeholders to maximize land use, optimize solar panel performance through microclimate management, and create measurable ecological outcomes. As a result, the market is witnessing increased participation from specialized service providers, ecological consulting firms, and technology-driven startups, further fueling competitive dynamics and service differentiation.




    A third major growth driver is the increasing involvement of diverse end-users, including NGOs, government agencies, and community groups, in the solar farm habitat restoration ecosystem. These stakeholders are not only advocating for more sustainable solar development practices but are also actively participating in restoration projects through funding, partnerships, and stewardship programs. The collaborative approach between solar developers, utilities, conservation organizations, and local communities is fostering knowledge exchange, resource pooling, and the establishment of best practices. This multi-stakeholder engagement is instrumental in scaling up restoration efforts, ensuring regulatory compliance, and achieving broader landscape-level conservation objectives. The growing alignment of corporate sustainability goals with habitat restoration initiatives is also encouraging private sector investment and innovation in this rapidly evolving market.




    Regionally, the solar farm habitat restoration market is characterized by varying levels of maturity, regulatory support, and ecological priorities. North America and Europe currently lead the market, driven by stringent environmental regulations, strong policy incentives, and a high degree of public awareness regarding biodiversity conservation. The Asia Pacific region, while still emerging, is witnessing rapid growth due to expanding solar capacity, increasing governmental focus on sustainable development, and large-scale land availability. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa present significant untapped potential, with growing investments in renewable energy infrastructure and rising interest in integrating ecological restoration into solar project planning. The regional dynamics are expected to evolve further as global climate and biodiversity commitments shape national and local policies, creating new opportunities and challenges for market participants.

  16. Ecological Monitoring - Fish - Dataset - NFWF Coastal Resilience Open Data...

    • resiliencedata.nfwf.org
    Updated Feb 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    resiliencedata.nfwf.org (2023). Ecological Monitoring - Fish - Dataset - NFWF Coastal Resilience Open Data Platform [Dataset]. https://resiliencedata.nfwf.org/dataset/ecological-monitoring-fish
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundationhttp://www.nfwf.org/
    Description

    This data was collected under National Fish & Wildlife Foundation Grant 0318.20.069532 awarded to The Nature Conservancy's U.S. Virgin Islands division. The project is titled 'Strengthening Coastal Resilience through Coral Reef Restoration (VI)'. The data contributes to ecological goal-based metrics outlined in the project's Implentation and Monitoring Plan. More specifically, this data was collected to measure the following metrics related to fish communities within defined reef habitats (reef crest and forereef) within and around the 50 acre restoration site: fish species richness, fish species diversity, fish species evenness, fish biomass by trophic group. This data was collected within the East End Marine Park on the northeastern side of the island of St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands. For each timepoint, data was collected at 12 random points (6 points in each habitat type) within the restoration area (restore sites) and 6 random points (3 points in each reef type) outside of the restoration area (control sites). Data was collected between 2022 and 2025. Timepoints represent pre-restoration conditions (2022), and post-restoration conditions (2024 and 2025). Data was collected using the methodologies described in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's 'National Coral Reef Monitoring Program (NCRMP) Reef Visual Census (RVC) Fish Survey Protocols U.S. Atlantic: Florida, Flower Garden Banks, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands 2022' authored by the Coral Reef Conservation Program (U.S.) (https://doi.org/10.25923/1baa-5g44)

  17. d

    Habitat data from grassland, moorland and woodland restoration sites in...

    • data.gov.uk
    • cloud.csiss.gmu.edu
    • +4more
    zip
    Updated Feb 16, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Environmental Information Data Centre (2023). Habitat data from grassland, moorland and woodland restoration sites in South West England in 2014 [Dataset]. https://www.data.gov.uk/dataset/243bcc85-b5e9-44fc-967b-add7905343b7/habitat-data-from-grassland-moorland-and-woodland-restoration-sites-in-south-west-england-in-2014
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 16, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Environmental Information Data Centre
    License

    https://www.data.gov.uk/dataset/243bcc85-b5e9-44fc-967b-add7905343b7/habitat-data-from-grassland-moorland-and-woodland-restoration-sites-in-south-west-england-in-2014#licence-infohttps://www.data.gov.uk/dataset/243bcc85-b5e9-44fc-967b-add7905343b7/habitat-data-from-grassland-moorland-and-woodland-restoration-sites-in-south-west-england-in-2014#licence-info

    Area covered
    South West England, South West, England
    Description

    This dataset contains vegetation abundance data and sward height data from a number of plots across a restoration gradient within South West England. The restoration gradient covered intensive land use (referred to in the data as reference or control), restoring and pristine habitats. Data were collected between April and July in 2014. Vegetation abundance was recorded as percentage cover of species within a 1m x 1m quadrat. Five quadrats were recorded per plot. Sward height was recorded using two methods: drop disc or direct measure. Five height measurements were taken using both methods at each site. To protect the anonymity of private landholders, details of sampling plot location is not provided with this dataset. The data were collected by the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology as part of the Tellus South West project. Full details about this dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5285/110199cf-245e-4fa8-a9ca-386657b5fe20

  18. d

    Data from: Bee communities along a prairie restoration chronosequence:...

    • datadryad.org
    • search.dataone.org
    • +2more
    zip
    Updated Dec 1, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rebecca K. Tonietto; John S. Ascher; Daniel J. Larkin (2016). Bee communities along a prairie restoration chronosequence: similar abundance and diversity, distinct composition [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.34n83
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad
    Authors
    Rebecca K. Tonietto; John S. Ascher; Daniel J. Larkin
    Time period covered
    Nov 30, 2016
    Area covered
    USA, Illinois
    Description

    Site ListA list of sites from which we collected data 2010 - 2012. Site name, the restoration stage and habitat type, county and locality information as well as total preserve size (each site was 1-ha designated within the larger preserves) and any management history information known my land managers is included.siteList.csvBee species by collection eventList of total number of individuals per bee species collected at each site; split per visit. Each site was visited 3x per year, except those designated in the Site List file as new additions in 2011. Contact Rebecca Tonietto if more descriptive data (e.g., by collection type) is requested.beeCommSiteYearVisit.csvBlooming plant cover and ground coverRaw data of ground cover and blooming plant cover per collection event date. Sites described in "Site list" file.forbsGroundCover.csv

  19. A

    2011-2013 Habitat Restoration and Reforestation at Overton Bottoms South

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    doc
    Updated Dec 10, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States (2013). 2011-2013 Habitat Restoration and Reforestation at Overton Bottoms South [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/groups/2011-2013-habitat-restoration-and-reforestation-at-overton-bottoms-south
    Explore at:
    docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 10, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    United States
    Description

    Brief summary of habitat restoration and reforestation work undertaken at Overton Bottoms South unit of Big Muddy NFWR.

  20. SHARP Wetland Baseline Data - Dataset - NFWF Coastal Resilience Open Data...

    • resiliencedata.nfwf.org
    Updated Mar 14, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    resiliencedata.nfwf.org (2024). SHARP Wetland Baseline Data - Dataset - NFWF Coastal Resilience Open Data Platform [Dataset]. https://resiliencedata.nfwf.org/dataset/sharp-wetland-baseline-data
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    National Fish and Wildlife Foundationhttp://www.nfwf.org/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Saltmarsh Habitat and Avian Research Program (SHARP) has assembled a large collection of historical and contemporary measures of plant and bird communities in tidal marshes from Virginia to Maine. In the current project, we used this platform to begin to assess the efficacy of restoration activities and to provide planning guidance to enhance the future resiliency of natural coastal assets. Our primary focus was to collected elevation, vegetation, and bird data to quantify baseline conditions at National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) funded Hurricane Sandy resiliency sites throughout the Northeast and mid-Atlantic states and at paired control sites. These data have been combined with similar data collected at Department of the Interior-funded resiliency sites across the same region into a common database, and will form the basis for long-term investigations into the efficacy of coastal restoration and management work.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2021). Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209] [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/ecosystem-restoration-program-ds209
Organization logo

Ecosystem Restoration Program [ds209]

Explore at:
kml, zip, geojson, csv, arcgis geoservices rest api, htmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 17, 2021
Dataset authored and provided by
California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

This layer contains the locations of ongoing and completed habitat restoration projects funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program, and contained as a subset of the California Habitat Restoration Project Database (CHRPD). Project locations are georeferenced by heads-up digitizing in as much detail as possible based on maps submitted by grant recipients. A background layer of 1:24,000 DRG Quads was used to locate the projects precisely. WHAT EACH RECORD REPRESENTS: The records represent individual project sites of a completed or ongoing restoration project funded by the Ecosystem Restoration Program through 2008. Many of the projects have multiple sites. Each site is represented by a center point. A separate shapefile records the entire footprint of those sites in this shapefile that occur over a larger area, and is available on request.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu