Data Privacy in Education Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Data Privacy in Education market size reached USD 6.2 billion in 2024, reflecting the sector’s rapid response to escalating data security concerns across the education ecosystem. The market is expected to expand at a robust CAGR of 15.8% during the forecast period, with projections indicating a value of USD 24.2 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth is driven by the increasing digitization of educational processes, the proliferation of online learning platforms, and stringent regulatory requirements surrounding student and faculty data protection worldwide.

The surge in digital transformation within educational institutions is a primary growth driver for the Data Privacy in Education market. As schools, universities, and training centers accelerate the adoption of learning management systems (LMS), cloud-based collaboration tools, and digital assessment platforms, the volume and sensitivity of data generated have increased exponentially. This includes personal identification details, academic records, behavioral analytics, and even biometric data. The rising frequency of cyberattacks targeting educational databases, coupled with high-profile incidents of data breaches, has heightened the urgency for robust privacy solutions. Educational stakeholders are now prioritizing investments in advanced data privacy software, secure hardware, and managed services to ensure compliance with global standards such as FERPA, GDPR, and CCPA, further fueling market expansion.

Another significant growth factor is the evolving regulatory landscape. Governments and educational authorities worldwide are enacting stricter data protection laws, compelling institutions to implement comprehensive privacy frameworks. The introduction of region-specific regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States, has forced educational entities to reassess their data handling and storage practices. This has resulted in a surge in demand for tailored privacy solutions that can be seamlessly integrated with legacy systems while ensuring transparency and accountability. The need for continuous monitoring, real-time threat detection, and incident response capabilities is driving the adoption of both on-premises and cloud-based privacy technologies across all education segments.

The continued expansion of remote and hybrid learning models post-pandemic has further amplified the need for data privacy in the education sector. Online learning platforms, virtual classrooms, and digital content providers are now central to educational delivery, exposing a broader range of users—students, teachers, administrators, and parents—to potential data vulnerabilities. The shift towards personalized learning and data-driven instruction has also increased the collection and analysis of student data, necessitating more sophisticated privacy controls. As educational institutions strive to balance innovation with compliance, the Data Privacy in Education market is witnessing strong demand for solutions that offer scalability, user-centric privacy management, and integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain.

Regionally, North America continues to dominate the market, driven by high digital adoption rates, strong regulatory enforcement, and significant investments in EdTech infrastructure. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, propelled by government-led digital education initiatives, rapid urbanization, and increasing awareness of data privacy risks. Europe remains a key market due to its stringent regulatory framework, while Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are witnessing steady growth as educational institutions modernize and prioritize data security. The global landscape is characterized by a diverse set of challenges and opportunities, with regional nuances shaping the adoption and evolution of data privacy solutions in education.

Component Analysis

The Component segment of the Data Privacy in Education market is divided into software, services, and hardware. Software solutions constitute the largest share, accounting for nearly 52% of the market in 2024. These include identity and access management (IAM), data encryption, data loss prevention (DLP), and privacy management platforms tai

Data Security in Education Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global data security in education market size reached USD 4.2 billion in 2024, propelled by a growing focus on protecting sensitive student and institutional data. The market is experiencing robust momentum, with a projected CAGR of 13.7% from 2025 to 2033. By 2033, the data security in education market is forecasted to reach USD 13.3 billion, reflecting the urgent demand for comprehensive cybersecurity solutions in educational environments worldwide. This growth is primarily driven by the proliferation of digital learning platforms, rising cyber threats, and increasing regulatory requirements for data privacy and protection in the education sector.

One of the most significant growth factors influencing the data security in education market is the rapid digital transformation sweeping across educational institutions globally. The adoption of e-learning platforms, cloud-based management systems, and digital assessment tools has expanded the digital footprint of schools, colleges, and universities. This digital expansion has created an urgent need for robust data security frameworks to safeguard sensitive information such as student records, financial data, and intellectual property. As educational institutions increasingly rely on technology for both teaching and administration, the attack surface for cybercriminals grows, necessitating advanced security measures such as encryption, identity and access management, and real-time threat monitoring. The integration of advanced technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning into security solutions is further enhancing the ability of institutions to detect and mitigate sophisticated cyber threats, thereby fueling market growth.

Another critical driver for the data security in education market is the evolving regulatory landscape governing data privacy and protection. Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are enacting stringent data protection laws, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States. These regulations mandate rigorous standards for the collection, storage, and processing of student and staff data, compelling educational institutions to invest heavily in compliant security solutions. Failure to adhere to these regulations can result in severe financial penalties and reputational damage, making regulatory compliance a top priority for educational organizations. Consequently, there is a growing demand for security solutions that not only protect data but also ensure compliance with local and international regulations, driving sustained investment in the market.

The increasing sophistication and frequency of cyberattacks targeting the education sector is another major growth catalyst. Educational institutions have become attractive targets for cybercriminals due to the vast amounts of personally identifiable information (PII) they store and the often limited cybersecurity resources at their disposal. High-profile incidents involving ransomware, phishing, and data breaches have highlighted the vulnerabilities within the sector and underscored the need for comprehensive security strategies. In response, educational institutions are prioritizing investments in cybersecurity training, incident response planning, and advanced security technologies to strengthen their defenses. This heightened awareness and proactive approach to cybersecurity are expected to continue driving the expansion of the data security in education market in the coming years.

From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the global data security in education market, driven by the early adoption of digital learning technologies and stringent regulatory frameworks. Europe follows closely, benefiting from robust data protection laws and significant investments in educational technology infrastructure. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by rapid digitalization in emerging economies, government initiatives to modernize education, and increasing awareness of cybersecurity risks. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also experiencing steady growth, albeit at a slower pace, as educational institutions in these regions gradually embrace digital transformation and prioritize data security investments. Overall, the global market is characterized by strong demand across all regions, with varying growth rates influenced by local tech

Data Privacy in Education Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Data Privacy in Education market size reached USD 3.2 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust expansion driven by the increasing digitization of educational environments. With a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.6% from 2025 to 2033, the market is forecasted to reach USD 9.4 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily fueled by escalating concerns over student and institutional data security, regulatory compliance requirements, and the widespread adoption of digital learning tools across K-12, higher education, and EdTech platforms. As per our latest research, the sector is witnessing a significant transformation as educational institutions and technology providers prioritize robust data privacy solutions to safeguard sensitive information and ensure trust within the educational ecosystem.

The rapid digital transformation within the education sector is one of the most significant growth drivers for the Data Privacy in Education market. The proliferation of online learning platforms, virtual classrooms, and digital administrative processes has led to an exponential increase in the volume and complexity of data generated and shared. This trend has made educational institutions increasingly vulnerable to cyber threats, data breaches, and unauthorized access to sensitive information. Consequently, schools, universities, and EdTech companies are investing heavily in advanced data privacy solutions, including encryption, access controls, and secure cloud storage, to protect student records, academic performance, financial data, and personal identifiers. The need to maintain compliance with global and regional data protection regulations, such as FERPA in the United States and GDPR in Europe, further accelerates the adoption of comprehensive data privacy frameworks across the education landscape.

Another pivotal factor propelling the Data Privacy in Education market is the evolving threat landscape and the growing sophistication of cyberattacks targeting educational institutions. Hackers increasingly view schools and universities as lucrative targets due to the vast amounts of personally identifiable information (PII) and intellectual property they hold. High-profile data breaches in recent years have heightened awareness among stakeholders about the critical importance of data privacy. This has led to a surge in demand for specialized software, services, and hardware designed to detect, prevent, and respond to cybersecurity incidents. Moreover, the rise of remote and hybrid learning models—accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic—has expanded the attack surface, necessitating robust endpoint security, secure communication tools, and comprehensive privacy policies tailored to digital education environments.

The Data Privacy in Education market is also buoyed by increasing governmental and institutional initiatives aimed at enhancing data governance and privacy awareness. Regulatory bodies worldwide are enacting stricter data protection laws and guidelines, compelling educational institutions to implement rigorous data management practices. In addition to legal compliance, there is a growing emphasis on fostering a culture of privacy among students, teachers, and administrators, with training programs and awareness campaigns becoming an integral part of institutional strategies. The integration of privacy-by-design principles in the development of EdTech solutions and learning management systems further underscores the sector’s commitment to safeguarding educational data. These efforts collectively contribute to a more resilient and privacy-conscious educational ecosystem, driving sustained market growth.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the Data Privacy in Education market due to the presence of stringent regulatory frameworks, advanced technological infrastructure, and high digital adoption rates among educational institutions. Europe follows closely, propelled by robust data protection standards and proactive government initiatives. Asia Pacific is emerging as a significant growth region, fueled by rapid digitization in education, increasing investments in EdTech, and rising awareness of data privacy risks. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing notable progress, albeit at a relatively slower pace, as governments and institutions in these regions enhance their focus on digital education and data security. The global landscape is th

This study is to understand how perceptions and the organization of school safety and security are associated with the level and type of law enforcement engagement in rural schools. A triangulation mixed methods design was used to collect and examine individual, school, and community level quantitative and qualitative data. The social-ecological theory of violence prevention guides the research by predicting that an interplay of factors at multiple levels influences the type and level of law enforcement engagement in rural schools. Specifically, it was predicted that the more organized and coordinated a school is in the area of safety and security, the more likely it is to be formally engaged with law enforcement. Formal engagement is defined as use of some version of the school resource officer (SRO) model or defined roles and responsibilities for law enforcement in schools that are articulated in documents such as a memorandum of agreement or understanding.

EdTech Privacy Compliance Tools Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global EdTech Privacy Compliance Tools market size reached USD 1.26 billion in 2024, driven by increasing regulatory scrutiny and the surge in digital learning platforms. The market is expected to expand at a robust CAGR of 15.8% during the forecast period, reaching USD 4.49 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth is primarily fueled by the proliferation of data privacy laws, heightened awareness about student data protection, and the rapid adoption of digital education technologies across the globe. As per our 2025 research, the EdTech Privacy Compliance Tools market is poised to become a cornerstone of the digital education infrastructure, ensuring that educational institutions and technology providers remain compliant and secure in an evolving regulatory landscape.

The primary growth driver for the EdTech Privacy Compliance Tools market is the global escalation of data privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States, and similar frameworks emerging in Asia Pacific and Latin America. Educational institutions and EdTech companies face increasing pressure to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of student and employee data. This regulatory environment compels organizations to invest in specialized privacy compliance solutions, which automate policy enforcement, data mapping, consent management, and breach notification processes. The rising number of high-profile data breaches within the education sector has further heightened the demand for robust compliance tools, making privacy management a top priority for educational stakeholders worldwide.

Another significant factor propelling the EdTech Privacy Compliance Tools market is the exponential growth of digital learning environments. The shift to online and blended learning models, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent normalization of remote education, has resulted in massive volumes of sensitive data being generated, stored, and shared across various platforms. As EdTech platforms integrate advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and cloud computing, the complexity of managing and securing personal data increases. Consequently, educational institutions and corporate training providers are increasingly adopting privacy compliance tools to mitigate risks, streamline compliance workflows, and foster trust among students, parents, and employees. These tools not only help organizations meet legal requirements but also enhance their reputational standing and competitive edge in the digital education market.

The integration of privacy compliance tools into existing EdTech ecosystems is further supported by the growing emphasis on ethical data practices and digital citizenship. Educational institutions are recognizing the importance of fostering a culture of privacy awareness among students, staff, and administrators. This cultural shift is reflected in institutional policies, staff training programs, and student curricula, all of which are underpinned by privacy compliance technologies. Additionally, the increasing collaboration between EdTech vendors and educational institutions to co-develop tailored compliance solutions is driving innovation and customization in the market. As privacy compliance becomes a critical differentiator for EdTech providers, the market is witnessing a surge in partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions aimed at expanding product portfolios and enhancing service capabilities.

From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the EdTech Privacy Compliance Tools market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The United States, in particular, has seen a surge in privacy-related litigation and regulatory enforcement, prompting schools and EdTech companies to prioritize compliance investments. Europe’s stringent data protection regulations and proactive regulatory environment have also contributed to substantial market growth. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is experiencing the fastest growth rate, driven by rapid digitalization of education, increasing government initiatives, and rising awareness of data privacy issues. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging markets, with growing adoption of EdTech solutions and a gradual increase in regulatory activities related to data protection.<br

Overall attendance data include students in Districts 1-32 and 75 (Special Education). Students in District 79 (Alternative Schools & Programs), charter schools, home schooling, and home and hospital instruction are excluded. Pre-K data do not include NYC Early Education Centers or District Pre-K Centers; therefore, Pre-K data are limited to those who attend K-12 schools that offer Pre-K. Transfer schools are included in citywide, borough, and district counts but removed from school-level files. Attendance is attributed to the school the student attended at the time. If a student attends multiple schools in a school year, the student will contribute data towards multiple schools. Starting in 2020-21, the NYC DOE transitioned to NYSED's definition of chronic absenteeism. Students are considered chronically absent if they have an attendance of 90 percent or less (i.e. students who are absent 10 percent or more of the total days). In order to be included in chronic absenteeism calculations, students must be enrolled for at least 10 days (regardless of whether present or absent) and must have been present for at least 1 day. The NYSED chronic absenteeism definition is applied to all prior years in the report. School-level chronic absenteeism data reflect chronic absenteeism at a particular school. In order to eliminate double-counting students in chronic absenteeism counts, calculations at the district, borough, and citywide levels include all attendance data that contribute to the given geographic category. For example, if a student was chronically absent at one school but not at another, the student would only be counted once in the citywide calculation. For this reason, chronic absenteeism counts will not align across files. All demographic data are based on a student's most recent record in a given year. Students With Disabilities (SWD) data do not include Pre-K students since Pre-K students are screened for IEPs only at the parents' request. English language learner (ELL) data do not include Pre-K students since the New York State Education Department only begins administering assessments to be identified as an ELL in Kindergarten. Only grades PK-12 are shown, but calculations for "All Grades" also include students missing a grade level, so PK-12 may not add up to "All Grades". Data include students missing a gender, but are not shown due to small cell counts. Data for Asian students include Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders . Multi-racial and Native American students, as well as students missing ethnicity/race data are included in the "Other" ethnicity category. In order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) regulations on public reporting of education outcomes, rows with five or fewer students are suppressed, and have been replaced with an "s". Using total days of attendance as a proxy , rows with 900 or fewer total days are suppressed. In addition, other rows have been replaced with an "s" when they could reveal, through addition or subtraction, the underlying numbers that have been redacted. Chronic absenteeism values are suppressed, regardless of total days, if the number of students who contribute at least 20 days is five or fewer. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting shift to remote learning in March 2020, 2019-20 attendance data was only available for September 2019 through March 13, 2020. Interactions data from the spring of 2020 are reported on a separate tab. Interactions were reported by schools during remote learning, from April 6 2020 through June 26 2020 (a total of 57 instructional days, excluding special professional development days of June 4 and June 9). Schools were required to indicate any student from their roster that did not have an interaction on a given day. Schools were able to define interactions in a way that made sense for their students and families. Definitions of an interaction included: • Student submission of an assignment or completion of an

Student Data Consent Management Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Student Data Consent Management market size reached USD 1.12 billion in 2024, reflecting the sector’s growing importance in the education technology landscape. The market is projected to expand at a robust CAGR of 14.8% from 2025 to 2033, with an estimated value of USD 3.65 billion by 2033. The surge in demand for digital learning solutions, coupled with increasingly stringent data privacy regulations, is a key growth factor propelling the adoption of robust student data consent management platforms worldwide.

The primary growth driver for the Student Data Consent Management market is the proliferation of digital learning environments and the corresponding rise in the collection and processing of student data. As educational institutions transition from traditional classrooms to hybrid and fully online models, the volume and sensitivity of student data collected has increased exponentially. This digital transformation necessitates secure, transparent, and compliant mechanisms for managing parental and student consent regarding data usage. Additionally, the growing awareness among parents, students, and educators about data privacy rights has heightened the demand for solutions that can efficiently manage, track, and audit consent processes in real time. The integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain further enhances the capabilities of these platforms, providing automated workflows and immutable audit trails that support regulatory compliance and build trust among stakeholders.

Another significant factor fueling market growth is the global tightening of data protection regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States, and emerging mandates in Asia Pacific and Latin America. These regulations impose strict requirements on educational institutions and EdTech providers to obtain clear, informed consent from students and guardians before collecting, processing, or sharing educational data. Non-compliance can result in severe penalties and reputational damage, prompting institutions to invest in sophisticated consent management solutions. The increasing collaboration between educational entities and third-party technology providers also intensifies the need for standardized consent management frameworks, further driving market expansion.

The rapid adoption of cloud-based learning platforms and the rise of remote and hybrid education models have also contributed significantly to market growth. Cloud deployment enables scalable, centralized, and accessible consent management operations that can support large, distributed student populations. As educational institutions expand their digital footprints and partner with a diverse array of EdTech vendors, the need for interoperable and flexible consent management systems becomes paramount. This trend is particularly pronounced in regions with high rates of digital adoption and government-led digital education initiatives. The evolution of user-friendly interfaces and mobile-first consent management solutions is also enhancing user engagement and streamlining compliance processes, making it easier for institutions to navigate complex regulatory landscapes.

Regionally, North America currently leads the Student Data Consent Management market, driven by a mature EdTech ecosystem, robust regulatory frameworks, and significant investments in digital education infrastructure. Europe follows closely, with strict GDPR compliance requirements accelerating adoption across both K-12 and higher education segments. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth over the forecast period, fueled by large student populations, expanding digital access, and increasing government focus on data privacy in education. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also emerging as key markets, propelled by digital transformation in education and growing awareness of data protection imperatives. These regional dynamics are shaping the competitive landscape and influencing product innovation and localization strategies among leading market players.

Component Analysis

The Student Data Consent Management market by component is segmented into software and services, each playing a vital role in facilitating secure and compliant consent management processes.

The Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC), formerly administered as the Elementary and Secondary School Civil Rights Survey, is an important part of the U.S. Department of Education's (Department) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) strategy for administering and enforcing civil rights laws in the nation’s public school districts and schools. The CRDC collects a variety of information including student access to rigorous courses, programs, resources, instructional and other school staff, and school climate factors such as student discipline and harassment and bullying. Much of the data is disaggregated by race/ethnicity, sex, disability and whether students are English Learners.Since the 2011–12 school year, OCR has collected data from all public districts and their schools in the 50 states and Washington, DC. Over time the CRDC’s collection universe has grown to include long-term secure justice facilities, charter schools, alternative schools, and special education schools that focus primarily on serving students with disabilities. OCR added the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to the CRDC, beginning with the 2017-18 CRDC. From 1968 to 2010, civil rights data were collected from a sample of public districts and their schools, except for the 1976 and 2000 collections, which included data from all public schools and districts.The purpose of the CRDC Archival Download Tool (Archival Tool) is to make the Department’s civil rights data from 1968 to 1998 publicly available. The Archival Tool organizes civil rights data by year, and provides users with access to the data, survey forms, and other relevant documentation. The tool also includes documentation on key historical CRDC data changes from 1968 to 1998. Users may extract district-level civil rights data.Important Consideration: Past collections and publicly released reports may contain some terms that readers may consider obsolete, offensive and/or inappropriate. As part of the Department’s goal to be open and transparent with the public, we are providing access to all civil rights data in its original format.Privacy notice:The Department of Education’s Disclosure Review Board determined that the CRDC files for 1968-1998 are safe for public “re-release” under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99).

1) Register is as of reporting date 2) Only includes schools and programs in Districts 1-32 and District 75 3) NYCEECs and District PreK Centers are excluded 4) District 75 Home and Hospital Instruction programs and students are excluded 5) Percents are of active students ages 5 and up, not of all students (any four year olds are exluded as they are not yet eligible for vaccination) 1) Enrollment as of last day of reporting period 2) Only schools and programs in Districts 1-32 and District 75 3) NYCEECs and District PreK Centers are excluded 4) District 75 Home and Hospital Instruction programs and students are excluded 5) For consent and consent withdrawal, only Covid-19 testing eligible students are included (Grades 1-12) 6) For unvaccinated population, only students aged 5 or above as of the day before the beginning of the reporting period are included "7) Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), educational agencies and institutions reporting or releasing data derived from education records are responsible for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in their reports from disclosure. a) If a cell is ≤ 5 the value is suppressed (""S""), and the next highest value in that row is also suppressed (""S""). b) If a cell is within 5 of the total number of students for the subgroup, the value is suppressed (""T""), and the next highest value in that row is also suppressed (""T""). This is necessary, because it is a FERPA violation to disclose that no students in a subgroup were vaccinated. This report includes counts of unvaccinated students, therefore data suppression is necessary on the maximum values also." 8) An empty cell indicates that there are no students for that grade or subgroup

This is a current list of approved security guard schools. The Security Guard Act of 1992 requires registration and training of security guards in New York State. The Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) approves the private security training schools and provides administrative oversight for mandated security training.

Splitgraph serves as an HTTP API that lets you run SQL queries directly on this data to power Web applications. For example:

See the Splitgraph documentation for more information.

ChildrenÂ’s Privacy Tech Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global ChildrenÂ’s Privacy Tech market size reached USD 2.1 billion in 2024 and is expected to grow at a robust CAGR of 16.3% during the forecast period, reaching approximately USD 9.8 billion by 2033. The primary growth driver for this market is the increasing regulatory focus on childrenÂ’s online privacy and the surge in digital adoption among children worldwide. As per our analysis, the combination of stricter data protection laws and the growing awareness among parents and institutions is significantly bolstering market expansion.

One of the most prominent growth factors for the ChildrenÂ’s Privacy Tech market is the global proliferation of digital platforms tailored for children, including educational apps, online games, and social media. As childrenÂ’s online engagement intensifies, so does the risk of data breaches and unauthorized data collection. In response, governments and regulatory bodies are enacting stringent laws such as the ChildrenÂ’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in the United States and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, which have compelled technology providers to innovate and implement advanced privacy solutions. These regulations mandate explicit parental consent and robust data anonymization protocols, fostering the adoption of privacy tech solutions across educational institutions, entertainment platforms, and social networks. The increasing digital literacy among parents and educators further accelerates the demand for privacy-centric technologies, ensuring childrenÂ’s safety in an ever-evolving digital landscape.

In addition to regulatory drivers, technological advancements in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and blockchain are transforming the capabilities of childrenÂ’s privacy tech solutions. AI-powered monitoring tools, real-time content filtering, and advanced encryption techniques are now integral to safeguarding childrenÂ’s digital interactions. The integration of privacy tech with existing digital platforms is becoming seamless, offering user-friendly interfaces and customizable controls for parents, educators, and enterprises. This technological evolution is not only enhancing the efficacy of privacy solutions but also broadening their applicability across diverse sectors, from e-learning and entertainment to online gaming and e-commerce. The convergence of technology and privacy is thus enabling a proactive approach to data protection, which is critical in an age where childrenÂ’s digital footprints are expanding at an unprecedented rate.

Another significant growth factor is the increasing collaboration between public and private sectors to promote childrenÂ’s digital safety. Governments are partnering with technology companies, non-profits, and educational institutions to develop comprehensive privacy frameworks and awareness campaigns. These collective efforts are driving the adoption of privacy tech solutions at scale, particularly in regions where digital infrastructure is rapidly developing. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift towards online learning and remote activities, further underscoring the need for robust privacy protection for children. As digital ecosystems evolve, the market for childrenÂ’s privacy tech is expected to witness sustained growth, supported by continuous innovation and cross-sectoral partnerships.

Data Privacy in Education is becoming increasingly critical as educational institutions transition to digital platforms. With the rise of e-learning and online classrooms, schools are handling vast amounts of student data, which necessitates robust privacy measures. Ensuring data privacy in education involves implementing secure data storage solutions, encryption, and access controls to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access. Educational institutions are also required to comply with regulations like FERPA and GDPR, which mandate stringent data protection standards. By prioritizing data privacy, schools can foster a safe learning environment that respects students' rights and builds trust among parents and educators.

From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the ChildrenÂ’s Privacy Tech market due to its advanced regulat

The purpose of this research was to develop an accurate description of the current involvement of law enforcement in schools. The researchers administered a school survey (Part 1) as well as a law enforcement survey (Part 2 and Part 3). The school survey was designed specifically for this research, but did incorporate items from previous surveys, particularly the School Survey on Crime and Safety and the National Assessment of School Resource Officer Programs Survey of School Principals. The school surveys were then sent out to a total of 3,156 school principals between January 2002 and May 2002. The researchers followed Dillman's mail survey design and received a total of 1,387 completed surveys. Surveys sent to the schools requested that each school identify their primary and secondary law enforcement providers. Surveys were then sent to those identified primary law enforcement agencies (Part 2) and secondary law enforcement agencies (Part 3) in August 2002. Part 2 and Part 3 each contain 3,156 cases which matches the original sample size of schools. For Part 2 and Part 3, a total of 1,508 law enforcement surveys were sent to both primary and secondary law enforcement agencies. The researchers received 1,060 completed surveys from the primary law enforcement agencies (Part 2) and 86 completed surveys from the secondary law enforcement agencies (Part 3). Part 1, School Survey Data, included a total of 309 variables pertaining to school characteristics, type of law enforcement relied on by the schools, school resource officers, frequency of public law enforcement activities, teaching activities of law enforcement officers, frequency of private security activities, safety plans and meetings with law enforcement, and crime/disorder in schools. Part 2, Primarily Relied Upon Law Enforcement Agency Survey Data, and Part 3, Secondarily Relied Upon Law Enforcement Agency Survey Data, each contain 161 variables relating to school resource officers, frequency of public law enforcement activities, teaching activities of law enforcement agencies, safety plans and meetings with schools, and crime/disorder in schools reported to police according to primary/secondary law enforcement.

Total enrollment count for students whose learning preference is remote or blended or missing and who have attended school in person at least once since September 16, 2020. Students attending charter schools, students receiving home or hospital instruction, pre-K students (3-K) attending New York City Early Education Centers (NYCEECs), and students attending some District 79 programs are not included. In order to comply with regulations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) on public reporting of education outcomes, data for groups with 5 or fewer students enrolled are suppressed with an “s”. In addition, corresponding groups with the next lowest number of students enrolled are suppressed when they could reveal, through addition or subtraction, the underlying numbers that have been redacted.

Interested parties can now request extracts of data from the NPD using an improved application process accessed through the following website; GOV.UK The first version of the NPD, including information from the first pupil level School Census matched to attainment information, was produced in 2002. The NPD is one of the richest education datasets in the world holding a wide range of information about pupils and students and has provided invaluable evidence on educational performance to inform independent research, as well as analysis carried out or commissioned by the department. There are a range of data sources in the NPD providing information about children’s education at different phases. The data includes detailed information about pupils’ test and exam results, prior attainment and progression at each key stage for all state schools in England. The department also holds attainment data for pupils and students in non-maintained special schools, sixth form and further education colleges and (where available) independent schools. The NPD also includes information about the characteristics of pupils in the state sector and non-maintained special schools such as their gender, ethnicity, first language, eligibility for free school meals, awarding of bursary funding for 16-19 year olds, information about special educational needs and detailed information about any absences and exclusions. Extracts of the data from NPD can be shared (under strict terms and conditions) with named bodies and third parties who, for the purpose of promoting the education or well-being of children in England, are:- • Conducting research or analysis • Producing statistics; or • Providing information, advice or guidance. The department wants to encourage more third parties to use the data for these purposes and produce secondary analysis of the data. All applications go through a robust approval process and those granted access are subject to strict terms and conditions on the security, handling and use of the data, including compliance with the Data Protection Act. Anyone requesting access to the most sensitive data will also be required to submit a business case. More information on the application process including the User Guide, Application Form, Security Questionnaire and a full list of data items available can be found from the NPD web page at:- https://www.gov.uk/national-pupil-database-apply-for-a-data-extract

School Cybersecurity Managed Services Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global School Cybersecurity Managed Services market size reached USD 2.8 billion in 2024, driven by the escalating frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks targeting educational institutions worldwide. The market is poised for substantial expansion, with a projected CAGR of 13.2% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to attain a value of approximately USD 8.5 billion. This rapid growth is attributed to increasing digitalization across schools, the proliferation of e-learning platforms, and the urgent need to safeguard sensitive student and institutional data from cyber threats.

The primary growth factor fueling the School Cybersecurity Managed Services market is the dramatic rise in cyberattacks on educational institutions. Schools, both K-12 and higher education, have become prime targets for ransomware, phishing, and data breach incidents due to their often limited cybersecurity resources and the vast amount of sensitive data they manage. The transition to cloud-based learning environments, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has further widened the attack surface, making robust cybersecurity solutions not just a necessity but a critical operational requirement. As a result, educational institutions are increasingly turning to managed service providers (MSPs) to bridge their internal security gaps, seeking comprehensive and cost-effective solutions that can adapt to evolving threat landscapes.

Another significant driver is the growing regulatory pressure and compliance requirements imposed on educational institutions. Governments worldwide are introducing stringent data protection laws, such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, mandating schools to implement robust cybersecurity measures. Non-compliance can lead to severe penalties, reputational damage, and loss of funding, prompting schools to adopt managed cybersecurity services to ensure adherence to these regulations. Additionally, the increasing adoption of digital learning tools, IoT devices, and cloud-based administrative systems further necessitates the deployment of advanced cybersecurity frameworks, fueling the demand for specialized managed services.

The market is also benefiting from heightened awareness among educational stakeholders regarding the importance of cybersecurity. School administrators, IT departments, and even parents are now more cognizant of the potential risks and consequences of cyber incidents, including identity theft, data loss, and educational disruption. This awareness is translating into higher budget allocations for cybersecurity initiatives and a willingness to invest in third-party expertise for proactive threat management. Furthermore, the ongoing shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals in the education sector makes managed services an attractive proposition, as they offer access to specialized talent, cutting-edge technologies, and continuous monitoring capabilities that are often beyond the reach of individual schools.

Regionally, North America continues to dominate the School Cybersecurity Managed Services market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed closely by Europe and Asia Pacific. The advanced digital infrastructure, high internet penetration rates, and proactive regulatory frameworks in North America have accelerated the adoption of managed cybersecurity services across educational institutions. Meanwhile, Europe is witnessing robust growth due to increasing investments in digital education and strict data privacy regulations. The Asia Pacific region, although still emerging, is expected to register the fastest CAGR over the forecast period, driven by rapid digital transformation in schools, government-led cybersecurity initiatives, and rising awareness about cyber threats in the education sector.

Service Type Analysis

The School Cyber

The National Pupil Database (NPD) is one of the richest education datasets in the world. It is a longitudinal database which links pupil characteristics to information about attainment for those who attend schools and colleges in England.

There are a range of data sources in the NPD providing detailed information about children's education at different stages (pre-school, primary and secondary education and further education).

Pupil level information was first collected in January 2002 as part of the Pupil Level Annual Schools Census (PLASC). The School Census replaced the PLASC in 2006 for secondary schools and in 2007 for nursery, primary and special schools. The School Census is carried out three times a year in the spring, summer and autumn terms (January, May and October respectively) and provides the Department for Education with both pupil and school-level data.

The NPD is available through the UK Data Archive in three tiers. Tiers two and three are the most sensitive and must be accessed via the Archive's safe room, whereas tier four can be accessed remotely through the Archive's Secure Lab.

Tier two contains individual pupil level data which is identifiable and sensitive. Individual pupil level extracts include sensitive information about pupils and their characteristics, including items described as 'sensitive personal data' within the UK Data Protection Act 1998 which have been recoded to become less sensitive. Examples of sensitive data items include ethnic group major, ethnic group minor, language group major, language group minor, Special Educational Needs and eligibility for Free School Meals.

Tier three represents aggregated school level data which is identifiable and sensitive. Included are aggregated extracts of school level data from the Department of Education's School Level Database which include items described as 'sensitive personal data' within the Data Protection Act 1998 and could include small numbers and single counts. For example, there is 1 white boy eligible for Free School Meals in school x who did not achieve level 4 in English and maths at Key Stage 2.

Tier four represents less sensitive data than tiers two and three. Included are individual pupil level extracts that do not contain information about pupils and their characteristics which are considered to be identifying or described as sensitive personal data within the Data Protection Act 1998. For example, the extracts may include information about pupil attainment, prior attainment, progression and pupil absences but do not include any identifying data items like names and addresses and any information about pupil characteristics other than gender.

Extracts from the NPD are also available directly from the Department of Education through GOV.UK's National pupil database: apply for a data extract web page.

The fourth edition (September 2017) includes a data file and documentation for the year 2016.

Student Data Privacy Auditing Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global student data privacy auditing market size reached USD 1.37 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust demand for privacy compliance solutions in the education sector. The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 14.2% from 2025 to 2033, culminating in a forecasted value of USD 4.65 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth is primarily driven by the escalating volume of student data, increasing regulatory scrutiny, and the widespread adoption of digital learning platforms across educational institutions worldwide.

One of the most significant growth factors in the student data privacy auditing market is the intensification of global privacy regulations. Legislation such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States, and similar frameworks in Asia Pacific and Latin America have compelled educational institutions to implement stringent data protection measures. These regulations not only mandate the secure handling of student information but also require regular audits to ensure compliance. As educational environments become more digitized, the complexity of managing student data privacy increases, thereby amplifying the demand for comprehensive auditing solutions that can identify vulnerabilities, track compliance, and mitigate the risk of data breaches.

Another crucial driver is the rapid digital transformation witnessed in both K-12 and higher education sectors. The widespread integration of cloud-based learning management systems, virtual classrooms, and EdTech solutions has exponentially increased the volume of sensitive student data being processed and stored online. This digital shift, while enhancing learning outcomes, also introduces new privacy risks and potential avenues for cyberattacks. Institutions are now prioritizing the implementation of advanced auditing tools and services to monitor data flows, detect unauthorized access, and ensure that third-party vendors adhere to privacy standards. The growing sophistication of cyber threats targeting educational data further underscores the necessity for ongoing audits, making privacy auditing an indispensable component of institutional risk management strategies.

Furthermore, the rising awareness among stakeholders—including parents, educators, and policymakers—about the long-term implications of student data misuse is fueling market growth. High-profile data breaches and incidents of unauthorized data sharing have heightened concerns regarding student privacy, prompting a proactive approach to data governance. Educational institutions are increasingly transparent about their data handling practices and are investing in privacy auditing as a means to build trust and demonstrate accountability. The trend towards third-party audits and certifications is also gaining traction, as it provides an independent assessment of institutional compliance and helps reassure stakeholders about the integrity of data protection measures.

Regionally, North America continues to dominate the student data privacy auditing market due to its advanced digital infrastructure, strong regulatory environment, and high penetration of EdTech solutions. Europe follows closely, driven by stringent data protection laws and a proactive approach to privacy compliance. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, supported by government initiatives to modernize education systems and increasing investments in digital learning technologies. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also emerging as important markets, albeit at a slower pace, as awareness and regulatory frameworks around student data privacy continue to evolve.

Component Analysis

The component segment of the student data privacy auditing market is primarily divided into software and services. The software sub-segment comprises a range of solutions designed to automate auditing processes, monitor data access, and generate compliance reports. These tools are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to detect anomalies, identify risk patterns, and provide actionable insights in real time. As educational institutions grapple with the sheer volume and diversity of student data, the demand for robust, scalable, and user-friendly software solutions has surged. These platforms are often

Device Management in Education Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global device management in education market size reached USD 7.5 billion in 2024, reflecting robust adoption across educational institutions worldwide. The market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 13.2% from 2025 to 2033, with the market size projected to reach USD 22.6 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing digitalization of education, rising deployment of student devices, and the critical need for secure, centralized management of these assets within educational ecosystems.

The surge in digital learning platforms and the proliferation of connected devices in classrooms have significantly contributed to the evolution of the device management in education market. Educational institutions are increasingly integrating laptops, tablets, and smartphones into their teaching methodologies, necessitating advanced device management solutions to ensure seamless operation, security, and compliance. The COVID-19 pandemic further accelerated this trend, with remote and hybrid learning models demanding robust device management frameworks to support distributed learning environments. As a result, schools and universities are prioritizing investments in device management software and services to enhance student engagement, streamline IT operations, and safeguard sensitive academic data.

Another critical growth factor is the heightened focus on cybersecurity and data privacy within educational settings. With the growth in device usage comes an increased risk of cyber threats, data breaches, and unauthorized access to student information. Device management solutions are now being designed with advanced security features, such as remote wipe, encryption, and multi-factor authentication, to mitigate these risks. Furthermore, regulatory frameworks such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are compelling educational institutions to adopt comprehensive device management strategies that ensure compliance and protect stakeholder interests. This regulatory pressure is expected to sustain demand for device management platforms over the forecast period.

The ongoing advancement in cloud technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) is also reshaping the device management landscape in education. Cloud-based device management platforms offer scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, making them increasingly attractive to schools and universities with limited IT resources. AI-powered analytics and automation are enhancing device monitoring, predictive maintenance, and personalized learning experiences. These technological innovations are enabling educational institutions to optimize device usage, reduce operational costs, and deliver superior educational outcomes. The integration of device management solutions with learning management systems (LMS) and other educational technologies further amplifies their value proposition, driving widespread adoption across diverse educational segments.

Regionally, North America dominates the device management in education market due to its early adoption of digital learning tools, robust IT infrastructure, and significant investments in educational technology. Europe follows closely, driven by strong governmental support for digital education and stringent data protection regulations. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by rapid urbanization, expanding internet penetration, and increasing government initiatives to modernize educational infrastructure. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also experiencing steady adoption, albeit at a slower pace, as they overcome infrastructural and economic challenges. Overall, the global landscape is characterized by dynamic growth, with regional nuances shaping market trajectories.

Component Analysis

The component segment of the device management in education market encompasses software, h

Abstract

The WORLD Legislative Repository for Education Laws 2023 provides the full-text legal documents used to code the WORLD Education Laws 2023 dataset. The collection includes education acts, child protection legislation, disability rights acts, gender equality acts, anti-discrimination legislation, and non-legislative policy and government commitments governing tuition-free and compulsory education from pre-primary through completion of secondary, disability rights in education, and gender equality in education. All laws and policies in effect as of January 2023 are included, whether they were recently passed or are decades old laws that were still in force.

Analysis unit

Laws

Kind of data

Legislation

Mode of data collection

Other

School Network Security Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global school network security market size reached USD 2.85 billion in 2024, reflecting the increasing prioritization of cybersecurity in educational institutions. The market is poised to grow at a robust CAGR of 10.7% during the forecast period, with the market value projected to reach USD 7.01 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily driven by the rising frequency and sophistication of cyberattacks targeting schools, the proliferation of digital learning platforms, and the stringent regulatory mandates for student data protection.

A key growth factor for the school network security market is the exponential rise in cyber threats specifically targeting the education sector. Schools and higher education institutions have become prime targets for ransomware, phishing, and data breaches due to their vast repositories of sensitive student and staff data, often with limited cybersecurity infrastructure. High-profile incidents in recent years have underscored the vulnerability of school networks, prompting administrators and policymakers to allocate larger budgets for cybersecurity solutions. The digital transformation of educational environments, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has further exposed schools to new vectors of attack, making robust network security an operational imperative.

Another significant driver is the rapid adoption of cloud-based learning management systems, digital classrooms, and online assessment tools. As schools increasingly leverage cloud technologies for remote and hybrid education, the need for advanced network security measures has become paramount. Cloud deployments, while offering scalability and flexibility, introduce unique security challenges such as unauthorized access, data leakage, and compliance risks. Consequently, schools are investing in multi-layered security architectures, including firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and identity management solutions, to safeguard cloud environments. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into security platforms is also enhancing threat detection and response capabilities, supporting market expansion.

Regulatory compliance and data privacy mandates are further catalyzing the adoption of network security solutions in the education sector. Governments across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific are enacting stringent regulations such as FERPA, GDPR, and local data protection laws, which require educational institutions to implement comprehensive security controls to protect student information. Non-compliance can result in substantial financial penalties and reputational damage, compelling schools to prioritize security investments. Additionally, increasing awareness among parents, educators, and students about the importance of cybersecurity is fostering a culture of vigilance, driving demand for robust security frameworks.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the school network security market, supported by high technology adoption rates, substantial cybersecurity budgets, and a proactive regulatory environment. Europe follows closely, driven by strict data protection laws and government initiatives to modernize educational infrastructure. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by large student populations, expanding internet penetration, and significant investments in digital education. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging markets, with increasing awareness and gradual adoption of network security solutions as digital learning gains traction.

Component Analysis

The component segment of the school network security market is broadly classified into hardware, software, and services, each playing a vital role in the overall security ecosystem. Hardware components, such as firewalls, routers, and network appliances, form the first line of defense against external threats. Schools are increasingly deploying next-generation firewalls and unified threat management appliances to provide comprehensive protection against malware, ransomware, and unauthorized access. The demand for hardware-based security solutions is particularly strong in large educational institutions and higher education campuses, where network complexity and traffic volumes are significant.

Software solutions are a critical pillar of the school network security market, offering