The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing data privacy regulations globally and the rising need for organizations to ensure compliance. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% between 2025 and 2033, reaching approximately $45 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. Firstly, the expanding scope of data privacy laws beyond the EU, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and similar regulations worldwide, necessitates robust GDPR compliance software. Secondly, the increasing volume and sensitivity of data being processed by both large enterprises and SMEs demand sophisticated solutions for data governance, access control, and breach prevention. Thirdly, the cloud-based segment is rapidly gaining traction, offering scalable and cost-effective solutions to organizations of all sizes. The on-premises segment, however, continues to maintain a significant share owing to concerns around data security and control within specific organizational environments. Competition is fierce, with established players like SAP, Oracle, and IBM alongside specialized providers like OneTrust and Informatica vying for market share. The competitive landscape is characterized by continuous innovation, mergers, and acquisitions, driving improvements in functionality, integration, and user experience. The geographical distribution of the GDPR Software market reflects the global nature of data privacy concerns. North America and Europe currently hold the largest market shares, driven by stringent regulations and high levels of digital adoption. However, the Asia-Pacific region is experiencing rapid growth, fueled by increasing digitalization and a rising awareness of data protection. The market segmentation by application (large enterprises and SMEs) showcases a distinct demand from both groups, though larger enterprises typically invest in more comprehensive and integrated solutions. Market restraints include the high cost of implementation and maintenance of GDPR software, particularly for smaller businesses, along with the ongoing evolution of data privacy regulations which necessitates continuous updates and adaptations of existing systems. Despite these challenges, the overall market outlook remains positive, driven by the critical need for robust data protection solutions in an increasingly data-driven world.

SAR Database contains details of staff & ex-staff Data Protection Act (DPA) SARs received by BIS (including predecessor departments BERR and DTI, and relevant Executive Agencies), and DECC.

Between August 2023 and August 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States took law enforcement actions against 20 companies for data privacy and security violations. The latest updated case was with Verkada. The charges were filed by the FTC for failing to secure Videos, Other Personal Data and Violated CAN-SPAM Act.

Between 2020 and 2024, the data protection supervisory authorities in Cyprus had the highest change in budget among the European Union countries, as their authority's budget grew by 130 percent during the measured period. The second-highest increase in budget was recorded at the Austria's data protection authority.

A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is one of the ways to find out what privacy risks people face when information is collected, used, stored, or shared about them. This helps the London Borough of Barnet find issues so that risks can be taken away or lowered to a level that is acceptable. It also cuts down on privacy breaches and complaints that could hurt the Council's reputation or lead to action by the Information Commissioner (the government watchdog). The London Borough of Barnet makes DPIAs public in with its Data Charter and the 2018 Data Protection Act and UK GDPR.

DP (Data Protection Act) / SAR (Subject Access Request) - Out of time

This dataset is about books. It has 2 rows and is filtered where the book is Privacy and data protection law in Ireland. It features 7 columns including author, publication date, language, and book publisher.

This dataset is an abridged version of the Information Management and Security Team Subject Access Requests Log. The log is used to record, track and report on the Subject Access Requests made to the FSA. A subject access request is the name given to a request made by an individual for personal data an organisation holds about them under the Data Protection Act.

DP (Data Protection Act) / SAR (Subject Access Request) - Out of time

We will conduct personal data protection law advocacy seminar related materials

DP (Data Protection Act) / SAR (Subject Access Request) - % In time

DP (Data Protection Act) / SAR (Subject Access Request) - Total Received - (YTD)

Provide a list of central competent authorities that are not public agencies under the Personal Data Protection Act.

🇬🇧 영국

DP (Data Protection Act) / SAR (Subject Access Request) - % In time - (YTD).

The Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) was intended to promote a culture of openness and accountability by giving people the right to access information held by public authorities; to improve public understanding of duties, why decisions are made and how public money is spent.

A Subject Access Request (SAR) is a written request that entitles individuals to find out what personal data is held about them by an organisation, why the organisation is holding it and who their information is disclosed to by that organisation.

🇬🇧 영국

🇬🇧 영국

DP (Data Protection Act) / SAR (Subject Access Request) - % Myöhästynyt aika

The Privacy Act Compilation contains descriptions of Federal agency systems of records maintained on individuals and procedures Federal agencies follow to assist individuals who request information about their records. It contains individual Privacy Act system descriptions and their governing regulations.

Section 4.2 of the Department of Justice Act requires the Minister of Justice to prepare a Charter Statement for every government bill to help inform public and Parliamentary debate on government bills. One of the Minister of Justice’s most important responsibilities is to examine legislation for inconsistency with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [“the Charter”]. By tabling a Charter Statement, the Minister is sharing some of the key considerations that informed the review of a bill for inconsistency with the Charter. A Statement identifies Charter rights and freedoms that may potentially be engaged by a bill and provides a brief explanation of the nature of any engagement, in light of the measures being proposed. A Charter Statement also identifies potential justifications for any limits a bill may impose on Charter rights and freedoms. Section 1 of the Charter provides that rights and freedoms may be subject to reasonable limits if those limits are prescribed by law and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. This means that Parliament may enact laws that limit Charter rights and freedoms. The Charter will be violated only where a limit is not demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society. A Charter Statement is intended to provide legal information to the public and Parliament on a bill’s potential effects on rights and freedoms that are neither trivial nor too speculative. It is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of all conceivable Charter considerations. Additional considerations relevant to the constitutionality of a bill may also arise in the course of Parliamentary study and amendment of a bill. A Statement is not a legal opinion on the constitutionality of a bill.