Data - Quality assessment table

These data contain concentrations of major and trace elements in quality-assurance samples.These are the machine-readable versions of Tables 2–5 from the U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, Distribution of Mining Related Trace Elements in Streambed and Floodplain Sediment along the Middle Big River and Tributaries in the Southeast Missouri Barite District, 2012-15 (Smith and Schumacher, 2018).

This data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Long Term Development Statement dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on 31st March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality; to demonstrate our progress we conduct annual assessments of our data quality in line with the dataset refresh rate. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks.We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.DisclaimerThe data quality assessment may not represent the quality of the current dataset that is published on the Open Data Portal. Please check the date of the latest quality assessment and compare to the 'Modified' date of the corresponding dataset. The data quality assessments will be updated on either a quarterly or annual basis, dependent on the update frequency of the dataset. This information can be found in the dataset metadata, within the Information tab. If you require a more up to date quality assessment, please contact the Open Data Team at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk and a member of the team will be in contact.

Blockchain-based applications are becoming more and more widespread in business operations. In view of the shortcomings of existing enterprise blockchain evaluation methods, this paper proposes a multi-source heterogeneous blockchain data quality evaluation model for enterprise business activities, so as to achieve efficient evaluation of business activity information consistency, credibility and value. This paper proposes a multi-source heterogeneous blockchain data quality assessment method for enterprise business activities, aiming at the problems that most of the data in enterprise business activities come from different data sources, information representation is inconsistent, information ambiguity between the same block chain is serious, and it is difficult to evaluate the consistency, credibility and value of information. The method firstly proposes an entity information representation method based on the Representation learning for fusing entity category information (CEKGRL) model, which introduces the triad structure of related entities in blockchain, then associates them with enterprise business activity categories, and carries out similarity calculation through contextual information to achieve blockchain information consistency assessment. After that, a trustworthiness characterization method is proposed based on information sources, information comments, and information contents, to obtain the trustworthiness assessment of the business. Finally, based on the information trustworthiness characterization, a value assessment method is introduced to assess the total value of business activity information in the blockchain, and a blockchain quality assessment model is constructed. The experimental results show that the proposed model has great advantages over existing methods in assessing inter-block consistency, intra-block activity information trustworthiness and the value of blockchain.

This dataset includes information on quality control and data management of researchers and data curators from a social science organization. Four data curators and 24 researchers provided responses for the study. Data collection techniques, data processing strategies, data storage and preservation, metadata standards, data sharing procedures, and the perceived significance of quality control and data quality assurance are the main areas of focus. The dataset attempts to provide insight on the RDM procedures that are being used by a social science organization as well as the difficulties that researchers and data curators encounter in upholding high standards of data quality. The goal of the study is to encourage more investigations aimed at enhancing scientific community data management practices and guidelines.

For more up to date quality metadata, please visit https://w3id.org/lodquator

This dataset is a collection of TRiG files with quality metadata for different datasets on the LOD cloud. Each dataset was assessed for

1. The length of URIs
2. Usage of RDF primitives
3. Re-use of existing terms
4. Usage of undefined terms
5. Usage of blank nodes
6. Indication for different serialisation formats
7. Usage of multiple languages

This data dump is part of the empirical study conducted for the paper "Are LOD Cloud Datasets Well Represented? A Data Representation Quality Survey."

For more information visit http://jerdeb.github.io/lodqa

This data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Curtailment dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on the 31st of March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality. To demonstrate our progress we conduct, at a minimum, bi-annual assessments of our data quality - for datasets that are refreshed more frequently than this, please note that the quality assessment may be based on an earlier version of the dataset. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks. We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.

Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) geospatial data sets containing information on Data Quality Assessment Areas (USACE IENC).

Under the Open Government Action Plan, and related National Action Plan, the FGP is required to report on its commitments related to: supporting a user-friendly open government platform; improving the quality of open data available on open.canada.ca; and reviewing additional geospatial datasets to assess their quality. This report summarizes the FGP’s action on meeting these commitments.

A key aim of the FNS-Cloud project (grant agreement no. 863059) was to overcome fragmentation within food, nutrition and health data through development of tools and services facilitating matching and merging of data to promote increased reuse. However, in an era of increasing data reuse, it is imperative that the scientific quality of data analysis is maintained. Whilst it is true that many datasets can be reused, questions remain regarding whether they should be, thus, there is a need to support researchers making such a decision. This paper describes the development and evaluation of the FNS-Cloud data quality assessment tool for dietary intake datasets. Markers of quality were identified from the literature for dietary intake, lifestyle, demographic, anthropometric, and consumer behavior data at all levels of data generation (data collection, underlying data sources used, dataset management and data analysis). These markers informed the development of a quality assessment framework, which comprised of decision trees and feedback messages relating to each quality parameter. These fed into a report provided to the researcher on completion of the assessment, with considerations to support them in deciding whether the dataset is appropriate for reuse. This quality assessment framework was transformed into an online tool and a user evaluation study undertaken. Participants recruited from three centres (N = 13) were observed and interviewed while using the tool to assess the quality of a dataset they were familiar with. Participants positively rated the assessment format and feedback messages in helping them assess the quality of a dataset. Several participants quoted the tool as being potentially useful in training students and inexperienced researchers in the use of secondary datasets. This quality assessment tool, deployed within FNS-Cloud, is openly accessible to users as one of the first steps in identifying datasets suitable for use in their specific analyses. It is intended to support researchers in their decision-making process of whether previously collected datasets under consideration for reuse are fit their new intended research purposes. While it has been developed and evaluated, further testing and refinement of this resource would improve its applicability to a broader range of users.

🇺🇸 미국

The EOSC-A FAIR Metrics and Data Quality Task Force (TF) supported the European Open Science Cloud Association (EOSC-A) by providing strategic directions on FAIRness (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) and data quality. The Task Force conducted a survey using the EUsurvey tool between 15.11.2022 and 18.01.2023, targeting both developers and users of FAIR assessment tools. The survey aimed at supporting the harmonisation of FAIR assessments, in terms of what it evaluated and how, across existing (and future) tools and services, as well as explore if and how a community-driven governance on these FAIR assessments would look like. The survey received 78 responses, mainly from academia, representing various domains and organisational roles. This is the anonymised survey dataset in csv format; most open-ended answers have been dropped. The codebook contains variable names, labels, and frequencies.

This is a coverage of the boundaries and codes used for the U.S. Geological Survey's National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program Study-Unit investigations in the conterminous United States, excluding the High Plains Regional Ground-Water Study. The data set represents the areas studied during the first decade of the NAWQA Program, from 1991-2001 ("cycle 1").

This resource provides files used for a quality assessment of an RDF social media archive where quality information is described using the Data Quality Vocabulary (DQV)and linked to RDF validation rules expressed in W3C SHACL.The actual quality assessment is then performed as SPARQL query on these sources.The research activities were supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BELSPO) BRAIN 2.0 Research Project BESOCIAL, Ghent University, imec.More information in the file README.md

Explore the data quality of the 2014-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) Public Use Files (PUFs) and its comparability with the NSDUH Restricted Use Files (RUFs). This report demonstrates the overall quality of the NSDUH PUFs and the statistical disclosure control techniques used to create them.Chapters:Describes NSDUH and lays out the objective of the report.Presents an overview of the NSDUH disclosure concerns, briefly discusses the disclosure technique known as Micro Agglomeration, Substitution, Subsampling, and Calibration (MASSC), and provides a summary of this study’s quality assessment and research methods.Discusses how some of the detailed tables based on RUF data were selected and replicated using PUF data.Describes the data quality assessment results and findings.Summarizes the conclusions.There are also five appendices that support the analysis further.Aprevious reportanalyzed the PUF data from 2002-2013.

This data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Operational Forecasting dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on the 31st of March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality. To demonstrate our progress we conduct, at a minimum, bi-annual assessments of our data quality - for datasets that are refreshed more frequently than this, please note that the quality assessment may be based on an earlier version of the dataset. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks. We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.

Land Quality Assessment

This dataset includes laboratory instrument detection limit data associated with laboratory instruments used in the analysis of surface water samples collected as part of the USGS - Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Council collaborative water quality monitoring project.

QUT Research Data Respository Dataset Resource available for download

This data table provides the detailed data quality assessment scores for the Single Digital View dataset. The quality assessment was carried out on the 31st of March. At SPEN, we are dedicated to sharing high-quality data with our stakeholders and being transparent about its' quality. This is why we openly share the results of our data quality assessments. We collaborate closely with Data Owners to address any identified issues and enhance our overall data quality. To demonstrate our progress we conduct, at a minimum, bi-annual assessments of our data quality - for datasets that are refreshed more frequently than this, please note that the quality assessment may be based on an earlier version of the dataset. To learn more about our approach to how we assess data quality, visit Data Quality - SP Energy Networks. We welcome feedback and questions from our stakeholders regarding this process. Our Open Data Team is available to answer any enquiries or receive feedback on the assessments. You can contact them via our Open Data mailbox at opendata@spenergynetworks.co.uk.The first phase of our comprehensive data quality assessment measures the quality of our datasets across three dimensions. Please refer to the data table schema for the definitions of these dimensions. We are now in the process of expanding our quality assessments to include additional dimensions to provide a more comprehensive evaluation and will update the data tables with the results when available.