54 datasets found
  1. Quality Performance Measures Data Package

    • johnsnowlabs.com
    csv
    Updated Jan 20, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    John Snow Labs (2021). Quality Performance Measures Data Package [Dataset]. https://www.johnsnowlabs.com/marketplace/quality-performance-measures-data-package/
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 20, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    John Snow Labs
    Description

    This data package contains quality measures such as Air Quality, Austin Airport, LBB Performance Report, School Survey, Child Poverty, System International Units, Weight Measures, etc.

  2. Test Data Management Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated May 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Test Data Management Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US and Canada), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), APAC (Australia, China, India, and Japan), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/test-data-management-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 1, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Test Data Management Market Size 2025-2029

    The test data management market size is forecast to increase by USD 727.3 million, at a CAGR of 10.5% between 2024 and 2029.

    The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of automation by enterprises to streamline their testing processes. The automation trend is fueled by the growing consumer spending on technological solutions, as businesses seek to improve efficiency and reduce costs. However, the market faces challenges, including the lack of awareness and standardization in test data management practices. This obstacle hinders the effective implementation of test data management solutions, requiring companies to invest in education and training to ensure successful integration. To capitalize on market opportunities and navigate challenges effectively, businesses must stay informed about emerging trends and best practices in test data management. By doing so, they can optimize their testing processes, reduce risks, and enhance overall quality.

    What will be the Size of the Test Data Management Market during the forecast period?

    Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
    Request Free SampleThe market continues to evolve, driven by the ever-increasing volume and complexity of data. Data exploration and analysis are at the forefront of this dynamic landscape, with data ethics and governance frameworks ensuring data transparency and integrity. Data masking, cleansing, and validation are crucial components of data management, enabling data warehousing, orchestration, and pipeline development. Data security and privacy remain paramount, with encryption, access control, and anonymization key strategies. Data governance, lineage, and cataloging facilitate data management software automation and reporting. Hybrid data management solutions, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, are transforming data insights and analytics. Data regulations and compliance are shaping the market, driving the need for data accountability and stewardship. Data visualization, mining, and reporting provide valuable insights, while data quality management, archiving, and backup ensure data availability and recovery. Data modeling, data integrity, and data transformation are essential for data warehousing and data lake implementations. Data management platforms are seamlessly integrated into these evolving patterns, enabling organizations to effectively manage their data assets and gain valuable insights. Data management services, cloud and on-premise, are essential for organizations to adapt to the continuous changes in the market and effectively leverage their data resources.

    How is this Test Data Management Industry segmented?

    The test data management industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. ApplicationOn-premisesCloud-basedComponentSolutionsServicesEnd-userInformation technologyTelecomBFSIHealthcare and life sciencesOthersSectorLarge enterpriseSMEsGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeFranceGermanyItalyUKAPACAustraliaChinaIndiaJapanRest of World (ROW).

    By Application Insights

    The on-premises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.In the realm of data management, on-premises testing represents a popular approach for businesses seeking control over their infrastructure and testing process. This approach involves establishing testing facilities within an office or data center, necessitating a dedicated team with the necessary skills. The benefits of on-premises testing extend beyond control, as it enables organizations to upgrade and configure hardware and software at their discretion, providing opportunities for exploration testing. Furthermore, data security is a significant concern for many businesses, and on-premises testing alleviates the risk of compromising sensitive information to third-party companies. Data exploration, a crucial aspect of data analysis, can be carried out more effectively with on-premises testing, ensuring data integrity and security. Data masking, cleansing, and validation are essential data preparation techniques that can be executed efficiently in an on-premises environment. Data warehousing, data pipelines, and data orchestration are integral components of data management, and on-premises testing allows for seamless integration and management of these elements. Data governance frameworks, lineage, catalogs, and metadata are essential for maintaining data transparency and compliance. Data security, encryption, and access control are paramount, and on-premises testing offers greater control over these aspects. Data reporting, visualization, and insigh

  3. Supplementary material 3 from: Chapman AD, Belbin L, Zermoglio PF, Wieczorek...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    bin
    Updated Mar 28, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arthur Chapman; Lee Belbin; Paula Zermoglio; John Wieczorek; Paul Morris; Miles Nicholls; Emily Rose Rees; Allan Veiga; Alexander Thompson; Antonio Saraiva; Shelley James; Christian Gendreau; Abigail Benson; Dmitry Schigel; Arthur Chapman; Lee Belbin; Paula Zermoglio; John Wieczorek; Paul Morris; Miles Nicholls; Emily Rose Rees; Allan Veiga; Alexander Thompson; Antonio Saraiva; Shelley James; Christian Gendreau; Abigail Benson; Dmitry Schigel (2020). Supplementary material 3 from: Chapman AD, Belbin L, Zermoglio PF, Wieczorek J, Morris PJ, Nicholls M, Rees ER, Veiga AK, Thompson A, Saraiva AM, James SA, Gendreau C, Benson A, Schigel D (2020) Developing Standards for Improved Data Quality and for Selecting Fit for Use Biodiversity Data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 4: e50889. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.50889 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3897/biss.4.50889.suppl3
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 28, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Arthur Chapman; Lee Belbin; Paula Zermoglio; John Wieczorek; Paul Morris; Miles Nicholls; Emily Rose Rees; Allan Veiga; Alexander Thompson; Antonio Saraiva; Shelley James; Christian Gendreau; Abigail Benson; Dmitry Schigel; Arthur Chapman; Lee Belbin; Paula Zermoglio; John Wieczorek; Paul Morris; Miles Nicholls; Emily Rose Rees; Allan Veiga; Alexander Thompson; Antonio Saraiva; Shelley James; Christian Gendreau; Abigail Benson; Dmitry Schigel
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Counts of occurrence records in 2019-04-15 snapshot of GBIF-mediated data that fit the three categories of expected responses for each of the event date-related validation tests.

  4. Data from: Adapting the Harmonized Data Quality Framework for Ontology...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    bin, mp4, pdf, txt
    Updated Jul 16, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tiffany J Callahan; Tiffany J Callahan; William A Baumgartner Jr.; William A Baumgartner Jr.; Nicolas A Matentzoglu; Nicolas A Matentzoglu; Nicole A Vasilevsky; Nicole A Vasilevsky; Lawrence E Hunter; Lawrence E Hunter; Michael G Kahn; Michael G Kahn (2024). Adapting the Harmonized Data Quality Framework for Ontology Quality Assessment [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6941289
    Explore at:
    mp4, bin, pdf, txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 16, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Tiffany J Callahan; Tiffany J Callahan; William A Baumgartner Jr.; William A Baumgartner Jr.; Nicolas A Matentzoglu; Nicolas A Matentzoglu; Nicole A Vasilevsky; Nicole A Vasilevsky; Lawrence E Hunter; Lawrence E Hunter; Michael G Kahn; Michael G Kahn
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Ontologies play an important role in the representation, standardization, and integration of biomedical data, but are known to have data quality (DQ) issues. We aimed to understand if the Harmonized Data Quality Framework (HDQF), developed to standardize electronic health record DQ assessment strategies, could be used to improve ontology quality assessment. A novel set of 14 ontology checks was developed. These DQ checks were aligned to the HDQF and examined by HDQF developers. The ontology checks were evaluated using 11 Open Biomedical Ontology Foundry ontologies. 85.7% of the ontology checks were successfully aligned to at least 1 HDQF category. Accommodating the unmapped DQ checks (n=2), required modifying an original HDQF category and adding a new Data Dependency category. While all of the ontology checks were mapped to an HDQF category, not all HDQF categories were represented by an ontology check presenting opportunities to strategically develop new ontology checks. The HDQF is a valuable resource and this work demonstrates its ability to categorize ontology quality assessment strategies.

  5. m

    Data from: Improving Behavior-Driven Development Scenarios: Empirical...

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Aug 26, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dillan Wyatt Sears (2025). Improving Behavior-Driven Development Scenarios: Empirical Evaluation of a Quality Assessment Framework [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/vgbw2847h2.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 26, 2025
    Authors
    Dillan Wyatt Sears
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset accompanies the paper evaluating the Quality Attributes-Based Guidelines for Evaluation (QABAGE), a framework designed to support the structured assessment of quality attributes in Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) scenarios. It contains anonymized materials from a multi-modal study that examined both the impact of QABAGE on BDD scenario quality and practitioners’ experiences with the framework. The dataset includes baseline scenarios, scenarios revised with QABAGE, and the evaluation protocol.

  6. R

    Regression Testing Tool Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Oct 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). Regression Testing Tool Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/regression-testing-tool-1988882
    Explore at:
    ppt, pdf, docAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 28, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The global Regression Testing Tool market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach an estimated market size of approximately $750 million in 2025, with a robust Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of around 12% anticipated through 2033. This upward trajectory is primarily fueled by the escalating complexity of software development and the increasing need for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. Businesses across all sectors, from agile startups to large enterprises, are recognizing the indispensable role of regression testing in ensuring software stability, preventing performance degradation, and maintaining a seamless user experience after code changes. The demand for sophisticated automation solutions that can execute comprehensive regression test suites efficiently is driving innovation and adoption of advanced testing tools. Key drivers for this market growth include the proliferation of mobile applications and web services, the growing adoption of cloud-based solutions, and the inherent need to reduce the cost and time associated with manual testing. While the market offers a diverse range of solutions, from on-premises installations to highly scalable cloud-based platforms, the trend leans towards cloud offerings due to their flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and ease of integration. Emerging economies, particularly in the Asia Pacific region, are expected to contribute substantially to market growth, driven by increasing digitalization and a burgeoning software development ecosystem. However, challenges such as the initial investment costs for automation tools and the shortage of skilled testing professionals could pose moderate restraints, though these are likely to be mitigated by the increasing availability of user-friendly, AI-powered solutions and growing training initiatives. This report provides a deep dive into the global Regression Testing Tool market, offering a comprehensive analysis of its current landscape and future trajectory. Spanning the Study Period of 2019-2033, with a Base Year and Estimated Year of 2025, and a Forecast Period from 2025-2033, this study leverages historical data from 2019-2024 to project future market dynamics. We delve into key market segments, influential players, emerging trends, and critical growth drivers and restraints, equipping stakeholders with the insights needed to navigate this rapidly evolving sector.

  7. Data from: Assessing Diffusion and Perception of Test Smells in Scala...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Mar 13, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jonas De Bleser; Dario Di Nucci; Coen De Roover (2019). Assessing Diffusion and Perception of Test Smells in Scala Projects [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7836332.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Jonas De Bleser; Dario Di Nucci; Coen De Roover
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Test smells are, analogously to code smells, defined as the characteristics exhibited by poorly designed unit tests.Their negative impact on test effectiveness, understanding, and maintenance has been demonstrated by several empirical studies. However, the scope of these studies has been limited mostly to Java in combination with the JUnit testing framework. Results for other language and framework combinations are ---despite their prevalence in practice--- few and far between, which might skew our understanding of test smells. The combination of Scala and ScalaTest, for instance, offers more comprehensive means for defining and reusing test fixtures, thereby possibly reducing the diffusion and perception of fixture-related test smells. This paper therefore reports on two empirical studies conducted for this combination. In the first study, we analyse the tests of 164 open-source Scala projects hosted on GitHub for the diffusion of test smells.This required the transposition of their original definition to this new context, and the implementation of a tool (SOCRATES) for their automated detection. In the second study, we assess the perception by and the ability of 14 Scala developers to identify test smells. For this context, our results show (i) that test smells have a low diffusion across test classes, (ii) that the most frequently occurring test smells are LazyTest, EagerTest, and AssertionRoulette, and (iii) that many developers were able to perceive but not to identify the smells.

  8. R

    SQL Unit Testing Platforms Market Research Report 2033

    • researchintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Intelo (2025). SQL Unit Testing Platforms Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://researchintelo.com/report/sql-unit-testing-platforms-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pdf, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Intelo
    License

    https://researchintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://researchintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    SQL Unit Testing Platforms Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the Global SQL Unit Testing Platforms market size was valued at $1.2 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $3.8 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 13.7% during 2024–2033. The rapid digital transformation across industries and the increasing complexity of database environments are primary drivers fueling the demand for robust SQL unit testing platforms globally. Organizations are recognizing the critical need for automated testing solutions to ensure data integrity, reduce deployment risks, and accelerate development cycles, particularly as data volumes and application complexity continue to grow. This surge in adoption is further propelled by the shift towards DevOps and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) practices, making SQL unit testing platforms indispensable for modern software development and quality assurance processes.



    Regional Outlook



    North America currently dominates the SQL Unit Testing Platforms market, holding the largest share with a market value exceeding 40% of the global total in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the region’s mature IT infrastructure, widespread adoption of advanced database technologies, and a high concentration of Fortune 500 enterprises with significant investments in digital transformation. Regulatory frameworks such as SOX and HIPAA further necessitate rigorous data quality assurance, driving demand for SQL unit testing solutions. The presence of leading technology vendors and a thriving ecosystem of software developers and QA professionals also contribute to North America’s commanding market position, facilitating strong innovation and early adoption of cutting-edge testing tools.



    Asia Pacific is projected to be the fastest-growing region in the SQL Unit Testing Platforms market, with a forecasted CAGR of 17.2% from 2024 to 2033. This impressive growth is driven by rapid economic development, expanding IT service sectors, and the proliferation of cloud-based applications across emerging markets such as China, India, and Southeast Asia. Governments in the region are actively promoting digitalization initiatives, leading to increased investments in enterprise software and database management solutions. The rising adoption of DevOps methodologies and the need for scalable, automated testing tools in response to high-volume transaction environments are key factors accelerating market expansion in Asia Pacific.



    In contrast, emerging economies in Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are experiencing gradual adoption of SQL unit testing platforms. While these markets offer significant long-term potential due to increasing digitalization and enterprise IT investments, challenges such as limited skilled workforce, budget constraints, and varying regulatory standards can hinder rapid uptake. Nonetheless, localized demand for data quality assurance in sectors like BFSI and healthcare, combined with efforts to modernize legacy systems, is expected to drive steady growth. Policy reforms aimed at fostering technology innovation and improving IT infrastructure are likely to support broader adoption in these regions over the forecast period.



    Report Scope





    Attributes Details
    Report Title SQL Unit Testing Platforms Market Research Report 2033
    By Component Software, Services
    By Deployment Mode On-Premises, Cloud-Based
    By Organization Size Small and Medium Enterprises, Large Enterprises
    By Application Database Development, Data Quality Assurance, Continuous Integration, Performance Testing, Others
    By End-User BFSI, IT and Telecommunications, Healthcare, Retail and E-commerce, Manufacturing, Othe

  9. G

    Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/robot-data-quality-monitoring-platforms-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms Market Outlook



    As per our latest research, the global Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms market size reached USD 1.92 billion in 2024, reflecting robust adoption across industries striving for improved automation and data integrity. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 17.8% during the forecast period, with the value projected to reach USD 9.21 billion by 2033. This strong growth trajectory is primarily driven by the increasing integration of robotics in industrial processes, a heightened focus on data-driven decision-making, and the need for real-time monitoring and error reduction in automated environments.




    The rapid expansion of robotics across multiple sectors has created an urgent demand for platforms that ensure the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of the data generated and utilized by robots. As robots become more prevalent in manufacturing, healthcare, logistics, and other industries, the volume of data they generate has grown exponentially. This surge in data has highlighted the importance of robust data quality monitoring solutions, as poor data quality can lead to operational inefficiencies, safety risks, and suboptimal decision-making. Organizations are increasingly investing in advanced Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms to address these challenges, leveraging AI-powered analytics, real-time anomaly detection, and automated data cleansing to maintain high standards of data integrity.




    A key growth factor for the Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms market is the rising complexity of robotic systems and their integration with enterprise IT infrastructures. As businesses deploy more sophisticated robots, often working collaboratively with human operators and other machines, the potential for data inconsistencies, duplication, and errors increases. This complexity necessitates advanced monitoring platforms capable of handling diverse data sources, formats, and communication protocols. Furthermore, the adoption of Industry 4.0 principles and the proliferation of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) devices have amplified the need for seamless data quality management, as real-time insights are essential for predictive maintenance, process optimization, and compliance with stringent regulatory standards.




    Another significant driver is the growing emphasis on regulatory compliance and risk management, particularly in sectors such as healthcare, automotive, and manufacturing. Regulatory bodies are imposing stricter requirements on data accuracy, traceability, and auditability, making it imperative for organizations to implement comprehensive data quality monitoring frameworks. Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms offer automated compliance checks, audit trails, and reporting capabilities, enabling businesses to meet regulatory demands while minimizing the risk of costly errors and reputational damage. The convergence of these factors is expected to sustain the market’s momentum over the coming years.




    From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the global market, accounting for a significant share of total revenue in 2024, followed closely by Europe and Asia Pacific. The strong presence of advanced manufacturing hubs, early adoption of automation technologies, and the concentration of leading robotics and software companies have contributed to North America’s dominance. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is witnessing the fastest growth, driven by rapid industrialization, increasing investments in smart factories, and the expanding footprint of multinational corporations in countries such as China, Japan, and South Korea. These regional trends are expected to shape the competitive landscape and innovation trajectory of the Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms market through 2033.





    Component Analysis



    The Robot Data Quality Monitoring Platforms market is segmented by component into Software, Hardware, and Services. The software segment holds the largest market share, as organizations

  10. G

    Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Oct 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/champion-challenger-testing-for-ai-models-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models market size reached USD 1.72 billion in 2024, reflecting robust adoption across diverse industries. The market is set to expand at a CAGR of 22.4% from 2025 to 2033, with projections indicating a market size of USD 12.12 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth trajectory is driven by the imperative need for rigorous model validation and monitoring, especially as enterprises increasingly rely on AI-driven decision-making processes to achieve operational excellence and regulatory compliance.




    The primary driver propelling the Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models market is the escalating complexity and deployment of AI solutions in mission-critical workflows. As organizations leverage AI to automate tasks, optimize customer experiences, and manage financial risk, the margin for error diminishes significantly. Champion-Challenger Testing, which involves comparing a current (champion) model with alternative (challenger) models under real-world scenarios, has become essential for ensuring continuous model improvement and mitigating bias or drift. This approach is particularly crucial in sectors such as BFSI, healthcare, and retail, where model accuracy directly impacts regulatory compliance, customer satisfaction, and organizational profitability. The growing need for transparency, auditability, and explainability in AI models is further fueling the adoption of these testing frameworks, ensuring that organizations can confidently deploy AI at scale.




    Another significant growth factor for the Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models market is the rapid evolution of AI technologies and the increasing volume of data generated by digital transformation initiatives. As enterprises collect and process vast amounts of structured and unstructured data, the risk of model drift and data quality issues rises. Champion-Challenger Testing frameworks enable organizations to systematically evaluate model performance over time, adapt to shifting data distributions, and maintain high levels of predictive accuracy. This is especially relevant in dynamic environments such as fraud detection and marketing analytics, where adversarial tactics and customer behaviors evolve rapidly. The integration of automated testing tools with cloud-native AI platforms is also streamlining the deployment and scaling of Champion-Challenger frameworks, making them accessible to organizations of varying sizes and technical maturity.




    The increasing regulatory scrutiny of AI models, especially in regions such as North America and Europe, is another pivotal factor shaping the Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models market. Governments and regulatory bodies are mandating rigorous model validation and monitoring to prevent unfair outcomes and ensure data privacy. As a result, enterprises are prioritizing the implementation of robust testing frameworks to demonstrate compliance with standards such as GDPR, CCPA, and industry-specific guidelines. This trend is prompting both established corporations and emerging startups to invest in Champion-Challenger Testing solutions, driving market expansion across verticals. Furthermore, the ongoing advancements in explainable AI (XAI) and model governance are reinforcing the need for continuous testing, positioning Champion-Challenger frameworks as a cornerstone of responsible AI deployment.




    Regionally, North America dominates the Champion-Challenger Testing for AI Models market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the region's mature AI ecosystem, high concentration of technology innovators, and stringent regulatory environment. Europe follows closely, driven by strong regulatory mandates and a growing emphasis on ethical AI. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by rapid digital transformation, expanding enterprise AI adoption, and rising investments in AI infrastructure. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually emerging as promising markets, supported by increasing awareness of AI's business value and the proliferation of cloud-based solutions. These regional dynamics collectively underscore the global momentum behind Champion-Challenger Testing as a critical enabler of trustworthy and high-performing AI systems.



    <a href="https://growthmarket

  11. Data from: Test Smell Detection Tools: A Systematic Mapping Study

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    bin, pdf, txt
    Updated Jul 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wajdi Aljedaani; Anthony Peruma; Anthony Peruma; Ahmed Aljohani; Mazen Alotaibi; Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer; Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer; Ali Ouni; Christian D. Newman; Christian D. Newman; Abdullatif Ghallab; Stephanie Ludi; Wajdi Aljedaani; Ahmed Aljohani; Mazen Alotaibi; Ali Ouni; Abdullatif Ghallab; Stephanie Ludi (2024). Test Smell Detection Tools: A Systematic Mapping Study [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4726288
    Explore at:
    txt, pdf, binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Wajdi Aljedaani; Anthony Peruma; Anthony Peruma; Ahmed Aljohani; Mazen Alotaibi; Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer; Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer; Ali Ouni; Christian D. Newman; Christian D. Newman; Abdullatif Ghallab; Stephanie Ludi; Wajdi Aljedaani; Ahmed Aljohani; Mazen Alotaibi; Ali Ouni; Abdullatif Ghallab; Stephanie Ludi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This is the dataset that accompanies the study: "Test Smell Detection Tools: A Systematic Mapping Study." This study has been accepted for publication at 2021 The International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE '21).

    Following is the abstract of the study:

    Test smells are defined as sub-optimal design choices developers make when implementing test cases. Hence, similar to code smells, the research community has produced numerous test smell detection tools to investigate the impact of test smells on the quality and maintenance of test suites. However, little is known about the characteristics, type of smells, target language, and availability of these published tools. In this paper, we provide a detailed catalog of all known, peer-reviewed, test smell detection tools.

    We start with performing a comprehensive search of peer-reviewed scientific publications to construct a catalog of 22 tools. Then, we perform a comparative analysis to identify the smell types detected by each tool and other salient features that include programming language, testing framework support, detection strategy, and adoption, among others. From our findings, we discover tools that detect test smells in Java, Scala, Smalltalk, and C++ test suites, with Java support favored by most tools. These tools are available as command-line and IDE plugins, among others. Our analysis also shows that most tools overlap in detecting specific smell types, such as General Fixture. Further, we encounter four types of techniques these tools utilize to detect smells. We envision our study as a one-stop source for researchers and practitioners in determining the tool appropriate for their needs. Our findings also empower the community with information to guide future tool development.

  12. Reference Knowledge Graphs of STEP and QIF Data for a Three-Part Box...

    • data.nist.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 21, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    William Z. Bernstein (2019). Reference Knowledge Graphs of STEP and QIF Data for a Three-Part Box Assembly [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.18434/M32146
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 21, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Standards and Technologyhttp://www.nist.gov/
    Authors
    William Z. Bernstein
    License

    https://www.nist.gov/open/licensehttps://www.nist.gov/open/license

    Description

    This dataset provides reference ontologies that were translated from product design and inspection data from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Smart Manufacturing Systems (SMS) Test Bed. The examples represents a three-component assembly of a box, machined from Aluminum, and has a technical data package available on the SMS Test Bed website. The use of the ontologies aims to integrate the product lifecycle data of engineering design represented in the STEP AP242 format, which is described in the ISO 10303 series, as well as quality assurance data, representing in the Quality Information Framework (QIF) standard.

  13. Z

    Evaluation datasets and results of the paper "A Framework for Measuring the...

    • data-staging.niaid.nih.gov
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chapela-Campa, David; Benchekroun, Ismail; Baron, Opher; Dumas, Marlon; Krass, Dmitry; Senderovich, Arik (2024). Evaluation datasets and results of the paper "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models" [Dataset]. https://data-staging.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_7761251
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    University of Toronto
    University of Tartu
    York University
    Authors
    Chapela-Campa, David; Benchekroun, Ismail; Baron, Opher; Dumas, Marlon; Krass, Dmitry; Senderovich, Arik
    License

    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

    Description

    Datasets and files used in the evaluation of the publication entitled "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models", where:

    BPS-models/: folder containing the BPS models used in the evaluation (the BPS models discovered by ServiceMiner are not included due to privacy reasons).

    The BPS models discovered by SIMOD are composed of i) a BPMN file with the process model structure, and ii) a JSON file with the parameters of the simulation. These files correspond to the format of Prosimos simulation engine (https://prosimos.cloud.ut.ee/).

    The BPS models of the Loan Application and Procure to Pay processes are composed of a BPMN file with both the process model structure and parameters, corresponding to the format of the BIMP simulator used in APROMORE (https://apromore.com/).

    measures/: folder containing the distance values of each measure reported in the paper.

    original-event-logs/: folder containing the (train and test) event logs used in the evaluation.

    simulated-logs/: folder containing the simulated logs evaluated in the paper (synthetic, SIMOD, and ServiceMiner).

    ComputeLogDistance.py: script to compute the distance measures proposed in the paper.

    To evaluate the distance measures of a set of simulated event logs in the folder simulated_logs/ against the test log test_event_log.csv.gz, run: python ComputeLogDistance.py -cfld test_event_log.csv.gz simulated_logs/

    *The flag -cfld is optional, due to the high computational complexity of the CFLD measure.

    WARNING: set the column names of each log accordingly (where log_1_ids are the IDs of the test log, and log_2_ids the IDs of the simulated logs). Examples:

    Column IDs for the (train/test) real-life logs, and the SIMOD simulated logs.

    EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='resource' )

    Column IDs for the Loan Application and Procure to Pay simulated logs.

    EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='Start_Time', end_time='End_Time', resource='resource' )

    Column IDs for the ServiceMiner simulated logs.

    EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='Activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='Resource' )

  14. D

    Test Data Management As A Service Market Research Report 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 30, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Test Data Management As A Service Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/test-data-management-as-a-service-market
    Explore at:
    pptx, csv, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Test Data Management as a Service Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Test Data Management as a Service market size reached USD 1.23 billion in 2024, with a robust year-on-year growth driven by the increasing complexity of enterprise applications and the demand for efficient data management solutions. The market is forecasted to expand at a CAGR of 13.7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a projected value of USD 4.11 billion by 2033. This significant growth trajectory is primarily attributed to the rising adoption of DevOps and Agile methodologies, stringent data privacy regulations, and the accelerating digital transformation across various industries.




    The growth of the Test Data Management as a Service market is propelled by the escalating need for high-quality test data to support continuous software development and deployment cycles. As organizations increasingly shift towards Agile and DevOps frameworks, the demand for reliable, secure, and scalable test data management solutions is surging. Enterprises are recognizing that effective test data management is critical for minimizing defects, reducing time-to-market, and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. The proliferation of data-intensive applications and the growing emphasis on data security further amplify the need for advanced test data management services, especially in highly regulated sectors such as BFSI and healthcare.




    Another key growth driver is the growing complexity of IT environments and the diversification of data sources. Modern enterprises operate in hybrid and multi-cloud ecosystems, where managing consistent and compliant test data across disparate platforms is a formidable challenge. Test Data Management as a Service offerings provide centralized, automated, and policy-driven solutions that address these challenges by enabling seamless data provisioning, masking, and subsetting. The rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications also necessitates sophisticated test data management to ensure the accuracy and reliability of model training and validation processes. As a result, organizations are increasingly turning to managed service providers to streamline their test data management processes, reduce operational overheads, and enhance business agility.




    The market is also benefiting from the tightening of data privacy regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA, which mandate stringent controls over the use and protection of sensitive data. These regulations are compelling organizations to adopt robust test data management practices, including data masking, encryption, and anonymization, to safeguard personally identifiable information (PII) during software testing. Test Data Management as a Service platforms are uniquely positioned to help enterprises navigate these regulatory complexities by offering automated compliance features, audit trails, and real-time monitoring capabilities. The increasing frequency of data breaches and cyber threats further underscores the importance of secure test data management, driving sustained investment in this market.




    From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the Test Data Management as a Service market, accounting for the largest share in 2024 due to the presence of numerous technology giants, early adoption of cloud-based solutions, and stringent regulatory frameworks. Europe follows closely, with significant growth observed in countries such as the UK, Germany, and France, where data privacy concerns and digital transformation initiatives are fueling demand. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period, driven by rapid digitization, expanding IT infrastructure, and the increasing adoption of cloud services in emerging economies like India and China. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also experiencing steady growth, albeit from a smaller base, as organizations in these regions increasingly recognize the value of efficient test data management in supporting their digital agendas.



    Component Analysis



    The Component segment of the Test Data Management as a Service market is bifurcated into software and services, each playing a pivotal role in shaping the industry landscape. The software sub-segment encompasses a range of test data management tools designed to automate data provisioning, masking, and subsetting processes. These solutions are increasingly integrated with advan

  15. f

    Tailored Site Data Quality Summaries.

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • figshare.com
    Updated Jun 27, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.; Davies, Amy Goodwin; Huang, Yungui; Forrest, Christopher B.; Dickinson, Kimberley; Walters, Kellie; Mendonca, Eneida A.; Hanauer, David; Matthews, Kevin; Bailey, L. Charles; Lehmann, Harold; Denburg, Michelle R.; Rosenman, Marc; Chen, Yong; Taylor, Bradley; Bunnell, H. Timothy; Katsoufis, Chryso; Razzaghi, Hanieh; Morse, Keith; Ilunga, K. T. Sandra; Boss, Samuel; Lemas, Dominick J.; Ranade, Daksha (2024). Tailored Site Data Quality Summaries. [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0001477156
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2024
    Authors
    Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.; Davies, Amy Goodwin; Huang, Yungui; Forrest, Christopher B.; Dickinson, Kimberley; Walters, Kellie; Mendonca, Eneida A.; Hanauer, David; Matthews, Kevin; Bailey, L. Charles; Lehmann, Harold; Denburg, Michelle R.; Rosenman, Marc; Chen, Yong; Taylor, Bradley; Bunnell, H. Timothy; Katsoufis, Chryso; Razzaghi, Hanieh; Morse, Keith; Ilunga, K. T. Sandra; Boss, Samuel; Lemas, Dominick J.; Ranade, Daksha
    Description

    Study-specific data quality testing is an essential part of minimizing analytic errors, particularly for studies making secondary use of clinical data. We applied a systematic and reproducible approach for study-specific data quality testing to the analysis plan for PRESERVE, a 15-site, EHR-based observational study of chronic kidney disease in children. This approach integrated widely adopted data quality concepts with healthcare-specific evaluation methods. We implemented two rounds of data quality assessment. The first produced high-level evaluation using aggregate results from a distributed query, focused on cohort identification and main analytic requirements. The second focused on extended testing of row-level data centralized for analysis. We systematized reporting and cataloguing of data quality issues, providing institutional teams with prioritized issues for resolution. We tracked improvements and documented anomalous data for consideration during analyses. The checks we developed identified 115 and 157 data quality issues in the two rounds, involving completeness, data model conformance, cross-variable concordance, consistency, and plausibility, extending traditional data quality approaches to address more complex stratification and temporal patterns. Resolution efforts focused on higher priority issues, given finite study resources. In many cases, institutional teams were able to correct data extraction errors or obtain additional data, avoiding exclusion of 2 institutions entirely and resolving 123 other gaps. Other results identified complexities in measures of kidney function, bearing on the study’s outcome definition. Where limitations such as these are intrinsic to clinical data, the study team must account for them in conducting analyses. This study rigorously evaluated fitness of data for intended use. The framework is reusable and built on a strong theoretical underpinning. Significant data quality issues that would have otherwise delayed analyses or made data unusable were addressed. This study highlights the need for teams combining subject-matter and informatics expertise to address data quality when working with real world data.

  16. B

    BDD Solutions Report

    • datainsightsmarket.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Jun 17, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data Insights Market (2025). BDD Solutions Report [Dataset]. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/bdd-solutions-1992545
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 17, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Data Insights Market
    License

    https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The BDD Solutions market is booming, projected to reach $6 billion by 2033 with a 15% CAGR. Discover key trends, leading companies (SmartBear, Tricentis, TestRigor), and regional market insights in this comprehensive analysis of Behavior-Driven Development tools.

  17. G

    gRPC Testing Tools Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). gRPC Testing Tools Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/grpc-testing-tools-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    gRPC Testing Tools Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global gRPC Testing Tools market size in 2024 stands at USD 412.6 million, reflecting robust demand and technological advancements in software testing frameworks. The market is demonstrating a strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.2% from 2025 to 2033, driven primarily by the increasing adoption of microservices architectures, API-centric application development, and the need for high-performance, secure communication protocols. By 2033, the global market size is forecasted to reach USD 1,243.7 million, as per our comprehensive industry analysis and projections. This growth is underpinned by the accelerating digital transformation initiatives across multiple industry verticals, as well as the rising complexity and criticality of enterprise-level software integration and testing.




    One of the key growth factors propelling the gRPC Testing Tools market is the widespread adoption of microservices and distributed systems in modern software development. Organizations are increasingly leveraging gRPC as a high-performance, open-source remote procedure call framework to enable seamless communication between services. As businesses migrate towards cloud-native architectures and containerized environments, the need for sophisticated testing tools that can validate, monitor, and secure gRPC-based APIs has become more pronounced. These tools ensure that microservices interact reliably, maintain high performance, and remain secure, thereby minimizing downtime and improving the overall quality of software deployments. The inherent complexity of gRPC communication, including its use of HTTP/2 and Protocol Buffers, necessitates specialized testing solutions, further fueling market expansion.




    Another significant driver is the growing emphasis on software quality assurance and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Enterprises are prioritizing automated testing frameworks to accelerate release cycles, reduce manual intervention, and ensure that applications meet stringent performance and security standards. gRPC Testing Tools play a pivotal role in automating API, performance, and security testing for gRPC endpoints, making them indispensable for DevOps teams and QA engineers. The integration of these tools with popular CI/CD platforms and their ability to simulate real-world scenarios, validate protocol compliance, and detect vulnerabilities are crucial for organizations aiming to maintain a competitive edge in fast-paced digital markets. Furthermore, the proliferation of open-source and commercial gRPC testing solutions is lowering barriers to adoption and fostering innovation within the ecosystem.




    The increasing regulatory scrutiny and data privacy requirements across industries such as BFSI, healthcare, and telecommunications are also boosting demand for comprehensive gRPC Testing Tools. Regulatory frameworks mandate rigorous validation of data integrity, security, and interoperability, especially in sectors handling sensitive information. gRPC Testing Tools enable organizations to conduct thorough security and compliance testing, ensuring adherence to industry standards and reducing the risk of breaches. As a result, enterprises are investing in advanced testing platforms that offer granular control, real-time analytics, and automated reporting capabilities. This trend is expected to continue, particularly as cyber threats evolve and industry regulations become more stringent.



    As organizations continue to embrace microservices and distributed systems, the role of Load Testing Tools becomes increasingly crucial. These tools are essential for evaluating how applications perform under various load conditions, ensuring that they can handle peak traffic without compromising on performance. With the rise of cloud-native architectures, businesses are leveraging Load Testing Tools to simulate real-world scenarios and identify potential bottlenecks before they impact end-users. By integrating these tools into their development pipelines, companies can optimize resource allocation, enhance user experience, and maintain service-level agreements, thereby gaining a competitive advantage in the digital marketplace.




    From a regional perspective, North America continues to do

  18. f

    Data_Sheet_1_The Oceans 2.0/3.0 Data Management and Archival System.ZIP

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    zip
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dwight Owens; Dilumie Abeysirigunawardena; Ben Biffard; Yan Chen; Patrick Conley; Reyna Jenkyns; Shane Kerschtien; Tim Lavallee; Melissa MacArthur; Jina Mousseau; Kim Old; Meghan Paulson; Benoît Pirenne; Martin Scherwath; Michael Thorne (2023). Data_Sheet_1_The Oceans 2.0/3.0 Data Management and Archival System.ZIP [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.806452.s001
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Dwight Owens; Dilumie Abeysirigunawardena; Ben Biffard; Yan Chen; Patrick Conley; Reyna Jenkyns; Shane Kerschtien; Tim Lavallee; Melissa MacArthur; Jina Mousseau; Kim Old; Meghan Paulson; Benoît Pirenne; Martin Scherwath; Michael Thorne
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The advent of large-scale cabled ocean observatories brought about the need to handle large amounts of ocean-based data, continuously recorded at a high sampling rate over many years and made accessible in near-real time to the ocean science community and the public. Ocean Networks Canada (ONC) commenced installing and operating two regional cabled observatories on Canada’s Pacific Coast, VENUS inshore and NEPTUNE offshore in the 2000s, and later expanded to include observatories in the Atlantic and Arctic in the 2010s. The first data streams from the cabled instrument nodes started flowing in February 2006. This paper describes Oceans 2.0 and Oceans 3.0, the comprehensive Data Management and Archival System that ONC developed to capture all data and associated metadata into an ever-expanding dynamic database. Oceans 2.0 was the name for this software system from 2006–2021; in 2022, ONC revised this name to Oceans 3.0, reflecting the system’s many new and planned capabilities aligning with Web 3.0 concepts. Oceans 3.0 comprises both tools to manage the data acquisition and archival of all instrumental assets managed by ONC as well as end-user tools to discover, process, visualize and download the data. Oceans 3.0 rests upon ten foundational pillars: (1) A robust and stable system architecture to serve as the backbone within a context of constant technological progress and evolving needs of the operators and end users; (2) a data acquisition and archival framework for infrastructure management and data recording, including instrument drivers and parsers to capture all data and observatory actions, alongside task management options and support for data versioning; (3) a metadata system tracking all the details necessary to archive Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reproducible (FAIR) data from all scientific and non-scientific sensors; (4) a data Quality Assurance and Quality Control lifecycle with a consistent workflow and automated testing to detect instrument, data and network issues; (5) a data product pipeline ensuring the data are served in a wide variety of standard formats; (6) data discovery and access tools, both generalized and use-specific, allowing users to find and access data of interest; (7) an Application Programming Interface that enables scripted data discovery and access; (8) capabilities for customized and interactive data handling such as annotating videos or ingesting individual campaign-based data sets; (9) a system for generating persistent data identifiers and data citations, which supports interoperability with external data repositories; (10) capabilities to automatically detect and react to emergent events such as earthquakes. With a growing database and advancing technological capabilities, Oceans 3.0 is evolving toward a future in which the old paradigm of downloading packaged data files transitions to the new paradigm of cloud-based environments for data discovery, processing, analysis, and exchange.

  19. Software Testing Services Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029:...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Software Testing Services Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US and Canada), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), APAC (China, India, Japan, and South Korea), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/software-testing-services-market-share-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Software Testing Services Market Size 2025-2029

    The software testing services market size is forecast to increase by USD 24487.3 billion, at a CAGR of 11.4% between 2024 and 2029.

    The global mobile application testing services market continues to evolve in response to the increasing integration of mobile devices into daily digital interactions. A major driver of this momentum is the rising demand for seamless user experiences, which is accelerating the need for cross-platform compatibility and high-performance applications. As mobile applications multiply and user expectations heighten, testing services must ensure consistent functionality, usability, and responsiveness. The growing use of crowdsourced testing is another dynamic factor, enabling organizations to leverage distributed tester communities to accelerate delivery cycles and improve test coverage. This trend reflects the market's shift toward scalable, real-time testing approaches that match the speed of modern development.
    Despite this progress, the availability of free and open-source testing tools presents a direct challenge to commercial service providers by reducing entry barriers and compressing margins. Additionally, the complexity of contemporary software applications and the continuous nature of agile development frameworks create operational strain on service providers, compelling them to continuously refine their offerings. Within this context, providers that prioritize test automation and advanced test data management are better positioned to navigate evolving user demands and retain strategic relevance.
    The market has witnessed a shift from traditional testing frameworks to more agile-compatible models. The emphasis on real-time testing and crowdsourced platforms reflects a substantial behavioral and structural change. Simultaneously, the rise of open-source tools has altered the commercial dynamics, requiring providers to justify value through differentiated service capabilities and specialized expertise.
    

    Major Market Trends & Insights

    North America dominated the market and accounted for a 37% share in 2023
    The market is expected to grow significantly in North America region as well over the forecast period.
    Based on the Product the Functional segment led the market and was valued at USD 17220 billion of the global revenue in 2023
    Based on the End-user the BFSI accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
    

    Market Size & Forecast

    Market Opportunities: USD 156.80 Billion
    Future Opportunities: USD 24487.3 Billion
    CAGR (2024-2029): 11.4%
    North America : Largest market in 2023
    

    What will be the Size of the Software Testing Services Market during the forecast period?

    Request Free Sample

    In today's complex software ecosystem, organizations are leveraging structured test plan development to align with evolving project needs and risk tolerances. Incorporating risk-based testing ensures resource prioritization across high-impact areas, while proven test estimation techniques help allocate effort precisely, especially in static and dynamic analysis testing cycles. As testing advances, test execution monitoring is used to validate ongoing test activities against quality assurance metrics and core software quality attributes. Tools for test coverage analysis, defect analysis reporting, and software vulnerability assessment are essential to identify gaps early, particularly when integrating penetration testing in security-focused pipelines.
    A reliable QA strategy includes robust code review processes, end-to-end understanding of the software development lifecycle, and strict adherence to requirements traceability. Automation in test script development and intelligent test data generation supports repeatability and consistency. Infrastructure components like software configuration management, version control systems, and test environment provisioning form the backbone of scalable QA operations. Testing across platforms demands cloud-based testing, mobile device testing, and cross-browser testing to validate real-world compatibility, supported by a browser compatibility matrix. Operational metrics like performance tuning and scalability testing ensure long-term reliability, while continuous security hardening activities reduce production vulnerabilities.
    

    How is this Software Testing Services Industry segmented?

    The software testing services industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

    Service
    
      Functional
      Digital testing
      Specialized offering
    
    
    End-user
    
      BFSI
      Telecom and media
      Manufacturing
      Retail
      Others
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
        Canada
    
    
      Europe
    
        France
        Germany
        Italy
        UK
    
  20. c

    Water Quality Test Strips

    • data.castco.org
    Updated Oct 29, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Rivers Trust (2025). Water Quality Test Strips [Dataset]. https://data.castco.org/datasets/theriverstrust::mersey-rivers-trust-citizen-science-data?layer=0
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    The Rivers Trust
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    What is being measured (including unit information): Water quality: Phosphate PO4 (ppb), Nitrate NO3 (ppm), Ammonia (ppm), Phosphate PO4-P (ppb), Ammoniacal Nitrogen NH3-N (ppm), Temperature (°C). Outfall safari: Size of the outfall (according to ranking), rank the aesthetics of the outfall, rank the flow of the outfall, and identify any litter, including sewage debris.Training: In-person training using the written procedures and demonstration of all systems. Reinforced by regular group communications and a Citizen Science Hub on Mersey Rivers Trust.Methods and Equipment used: Water Quality: For water blitzes, Mersey Rivers Trust uses Hanna Checkers for Phosphate (HI-713) and Ammoniacal Nitrogen (NH3-N) (HI-715). We are trialling how we use Hanna Checkers with River Guardians, who regularly submit data. For all River Guardians water quality testing, we use LaMotte test strips, Insta-TEST Low Range Phosphate Test Strips, Insta-TEST Nitrate Test Strips, and Insta-TEST Ammonia Test Strips. Outfall safari: One of the significant threats to water quality in urban rivers is misconnected pipes, which pollute our local watercourses and compromise the biodiversity and amenity value of our waterways. This is a citizen science method for systematically inspecting, recording, and mapping the behaviour of outfalls from our local watercourses. This data builds on information gathered from previous surveys conducted by the Environment Agency and the local water company under the Water Framework Directive.Quality Assurance processes: Data gathered via EpiCollect and Cartographer were downloaded and reviewed by the program coordinator; location data were checked; input values were compared to previous readings at the same location; and unusual values were reviewed. Any necessary calculations are performed by the coordinator, not by individual scientists. Monthly report published by program coordinator on the Mersey Rivers Trust and emailed to the Newsletter email list.Timescale: Ongoing. The project started in March 2022. Data from February 2017 – present. This dataset is static at the moment, but we are working on ways to ensure it gets updated on a regular basis. Contact info: riverguardians@merseyrivers.orgA detailed dashbaord view of the Water Quality Test Strips data is viewable here: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4cba569329a1474292535f26aaf2f09e

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
John Snow Labs (2021). Quality Performance Measures Data Package [Dataset]. https://www.johnsnowlabs.com/marketplace/quality-performance-measures-data-package/
Organization logo

Quality Performance Measures Data Package

Weights, Measures, And Other Tests;Availability Of Structural Measures;Hospitals Care For Patients;Quality Measures Reporting;Corporate Plan And Performance Reporting

Explore at:
csvAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jan 20, 2021
Dataset authored and provided by
John Snow Labs
Description

This data package contains quality measures such as Air Quality, Austin Airport, LBB Performance Report, School Survey, Child Poverty, System International Units, Weight Measures, etc.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu