The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey. Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

The annual Retail store data CD-ROM is an easy-to-use tool for quickly discovering retail trade patterns and trends. The current product presents results from the 1999 and 2000 Annual Retail Store and Annual Retail Chain surveys. This product contains numerous cross-classified data tables using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The data tables provide access to a wide range of financial variables, such as revenues, expenses, inventory, sales per square footage (chain stores only) and the number of stores. Most data tables contain detailed information on industry (as low as 5-digit NAICS codes), geography (Canada, provinces and territories) and store type (chains, independents, franchises). The electronic product also contains survey metadata, questionnaires, information on industry codes and definitions, and the list of retail chain store respondents.

With a step-by-step approach, learn to prepare Excel files, data worksheets, and individual data columns for data analysis; practice conditional formatting and creating pivot tables/charts; go over basic principles of Research Data Management as they might apply to an Excel project. Avec une approche étape par étape, apprenez à préparer pour l’analyse des données des fichiers Excel, des feuilles de calcul de données et des colonnes de données individuelles; pratiquez la mise en forme conditionnelle et la création de tableaux croisés dynamiques ou de graphiques; passez en revue les principes de base de la gestion des données de recherche tels qu’ils pourraient s’appliquer à un projet Excel.

In order to test hypotheses about groundwater flow under and into estuaries and the Atlantic Ocean, geophysical surveys, geophysical probing, submarine groundwater sampling, and sediment coring were conducted by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists at Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS) from 2004 through 2006. Coastal resource managers at CCNS and elsewhere are concerned about nutrients that are entering coastal waters via submarine groundwater discharge, which are contributing to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. The research carried out as part of the study described here was designed, in part, to help refine assumptions required by earlier versions of models about the nature of submarine groundwater flow and discharge at CCNS. This study was conducted in four phases, with a variety of field techniques and equipment employed in each phase. Phase 1 consisted of continuous resistivity profiling (CRP) surveys of the entire study area conducted in 2004. Phase 2 consisted of CRP ground-truthing via resistivity probe measurements and submarine groundwater sampling from hydraulically-drive piezometers using a barge in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2005. Phase 3 consisted of supplemental detailed CRP surveys in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2006. Finally, Phase 4 consisted of sediment coring and porewater extraction in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area later in 2006 to supplement the 2005 sampling.

• About Dataset Safa S. Abdul-Jabbar, Alaa k. Farhan

• Context This is the first Dataset for various ordinary patients in Iraq. The Dataset provides the patients’ Cell Blood Count test information that can be used to create a Hematology diagnosis/prediction system. Also, this Data was collected in 2022 from Al-Zahraa Al-Ahly Hospital. These data can be cleaned & analyzed using any programming language because it is provided in an excel file that can be accessed and manipulated easily. The user just needs to understand how rows and columns are arranged because the data was collected as images(CBC images) from the laboratories and then stored the extracted data in an excel file.  Content This Dataset contains 500 rows. For each row (patient information), there are 21 columns containing CBC test features that can be described as follows:

• ID: Patients Identifier

• WBC: White Blood Cell, Normal Ranges: 4.0 to 10.0, Unit: 10^9/L.

• LYMp: Lymphocytes percentage, which is a type of white blood cell, Normal Ranges: 20.0 to 40.0, Unit: %

• MIDp: Indicates the percentage combined value of the other types of white blood cells not classified as lymphocytes or granulocytes, Normal Ranges: 1.0 to 15.0, Unit: %

• NEUTp: Neutrophils are a type of white blood cell (leukocytes); neutrophils percentage, Normal Ranges: 50.0 to 70.0, Unit: %

• LYMn: Lymphocytes number are a type of white blood cell, Normal Ranges: 0.6 to 4.1, Unit: 10^9/L.

• MIDn: Indicates the combined number of other white blood cells not classified as lymphocytes or granulocytes, Normal Ranges: 0.1 to 1.8, Unit: 10^9/L.

• NEUTn: Neutrophils Number, Normal Ranges: 2.0 to 7.8, Unit: 10^9/L.

• RBC: Red Blood Cell, Normal Ranges: 3.50 to 5.50, Unit: 10^12/L

• HGB: Hemoglobin, Normal Ranges: 11.0 to 16.0, Unit: g/dL

• HCT: Hematocrit is the proportion, by volume, of the Blood that consists of red blood cells, Normal Ranges: 36.0 to 48.0, Unit: %

• MCV: Mean Corpuscular Volume, Normal Ranges: 80.0 to 99.0, Unit: fL

• MCH: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin is the average amount of haemoglobin in the average red cell, Normal Ranges: 26.0 to 32.0, Unit: pg

• MCHC: Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, Normal Ranges: 32.0 to 36.0, Unit: g/dL

• RDWSD: Red Blood Cell Distribution Width, Normal Ranges: 37.0 to 54.0, Unit: fL

• RDWCV: Red blood cell distribution width, Normal Ranges: 11.5 to 14.5, Unit: %

• PLT: Platelet Count, Normal Ranges: 100 to 400, Unit: 10^9/L

• MPV: Mean Platelet Volume, Normal Ranges: 7.4 to 10.4, Unit: fL

• PDW: Red Cell Distribution Width, Normal Ranges: 10.0 to 17.0, Unit: %

• PCT: The level of Procalcitonin in the Blood, Normal Ranges: 0.10 to 0.28, Unit: %

• PLCR: Platelet Large Cell Ratio, Normal Ranges: 13.0 to 43.0, Unit: %

• Acknowledgements We thank the entire Al-Zahraa Al-Ahly Hospital Hospital team, especially the hospital manager, for cooperating with us in collecting this data while maintaining patients' confidentiality.

The dataset for the article "The current utilization status of wearable devices in clinical research".Analyses were performed by utilizing the JMP Pro 16.10, Microsoft Excel for Mac version 16 (Microsoft).The file extension "jrp" is a file of the statistical analysis software JMP, which contains both the analysis code and the data set.In case JMP is not available, a "csv" file as a data set and JMP script, the analysis code, are prepared in "rtf" format.The "xlsx" file is a Microsoft Excel file that contains the data set and the data plotted or tabulated using Microsoft Excel functions.Supplementary Figure 1. NCT number duplication frequencyIncludes Excel file used to create the figure (Supplemental Figure 1).・Sfig1_NCT number duplication frequency.xlsxSupplementary Figure 2-5　Simple and annual time series aggregationIncludes Excel file, JMP repo file, csv dataset of JMP repo file and JMP scripts used to create the figure (Supplementary Figures 2-5).・Sfig2-5 Annual time series aggregation.xlsx・Sfig2 Study Type.jrp・Sfig4device type.jrp・Sfig3 Interventions Type.jrp・Sfig5Conditions type.jrp・Sfig2, 3 ,5_database.csv・Sfig2_JMP script_Study type.rtf・Sfig3_JMP script Interventions type.rtf・Sfig5_JMP script Conditions type.rtf・Sfig4_dataset.csv・Sfig4_JMP script_device type.rtfSupplementary Figures 6-11 Mosaic diagram of intervention by conditionSupplementary tables 4-9 Analysis of contingency table for intervention by condition JMP repot files used to create the figures(Supplementary Figures 6-11 ) and tables(Supplementary Tablea 4-9) , including the csv dataset of JMP repot files and JMP scripts.・Sfig6-11 Stable4-9 Intervention devicetype_conditions.jrp・Sfig6-11_Stable4-9_dataset.csv・Sfig6-11_Stable4-9_JMP script.rtfSupplementary Figure 12. Distribution of enrollmentIncludes Excel file, JMP repo file, csv dataset of JMP repo file and JMP scripts used to create the figure (Supplementary Figures 12).・Sfig12_Distribution of enrollment.jrp・Sfig12_Distribution of enrollment.csv・Sfig12_JMP script.rtf

An excel file containing the following data for each lavaka:- Study area (SA) number- Perimeter [m] and area [m²] on satellite image- Year of the satellite image- Perimeter (Shape_Length, [m]) and area (Shape_Area, [m²]) on the 1949 and 1969 image- Total bare surface perimeter (peri, [m]) and area (area, [m²] for all images- Relief [m]: height difference between lavaka edge and outlet [m]- Vertical distance to stream (DZ_SL [m])- Horizontal distance to stream (DXY_SL [m])- Lavaka outlet coordinates (X_OUTL, Y_OUTL)- Flow accumulation at outlet (FA)- Distance to drainage divide (DD_DXY [m])- Drainage Divide order (DD_order)- Lavaka edge coordinates (X_LE, Y_LE)

The open repository consists of two folders; Dataset and Picture. The dataset folder consists file “AWS Dataset Pangandaraan.xlsx”. There are 10 columns with three first columns as time attributes and the other six as atmosphere datasets. Each parameter has 8085 data, and Each parameter has a parameter index at the bottom of the column we added, including mMinimum, mMaximum, and Average values.

For further use, the user can choose one or more parameters for calculating or analyzing. For example, wind data (speed and direction) can be utilized to calculate Waves using the Hindcast method. Furthermore, the user can filter data by using the feature in Excel to extract the exact time range for analyzing various phenomena considered correlated to atmosphere data around Pangandaran, Indonesia.

The second folder, named “Picture,” contains three figures, including the monthly distribution of datasets, temporal data, and wind rose. Furthermore, the user can filter data by using the feature in Excel sheet to extract the exact time range for analyzing various phenomena considered correlated to atmosphere data around Pangandaran, Indonesia

📈 Daily Historical Stock Price Data for Excel Industries Limited (2002–2025)

A clean, ready-to-use dataset containing daily stock prices for Excel Industries Limited from 2002-07-01 to 2025-05-28. This dataset is ideal for use in financial analysis, algorithmic trading, machine learning, and academic research.

  🗂️ Dataset Overview

Company: Excel Industries Limited Ticker Symbol: EXCELINDUS.NS Date Range: 2002-07-01 to 2025-05-28 Frequency: Daily Total Records: 5688… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/khaledxbenali/daily-historical-stock-price-data-for-excel-industries-limited-20022025.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time (FT) and part-time (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Excel. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Excel population, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Employment patterns: Within Excel, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 154 men and 106 women in the workforce. Among them, 106 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 51 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
• Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 0.94% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 23.53% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket.
• Annual income above $100,000: 15.09% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while 11.76% of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket.
• Refer to the research insights for more key observations on more income brackets ( Annual income under $24,999, Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999, Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999, Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999 and Annual income above $100,000) and employment types (full-time year-round and part-time)

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• $1 to $2,499 or loss
• $2,500 to $4,999
• $5,000 to $7,499
• $7,500 to $9,999
• $10,000 to $12,499
• $12,500 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $17,499
• $17,500 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $22,499
• $22,500 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $54,999
• $55,000 to $64,999
• $65,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Bracket: This column showcases 20 income brackets ranging from $1 to $100,000+..
• Full-Time Males: The count of males employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Males: The count of males employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket
• Full-Time Females: The count of females employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Females: The count of females employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket

Employment type classifications include:

• Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
• Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel median household income by race. You can refer the same here

The Alaska Geochemical Database Version 2.0 (AGDB2) contains new geochemical data compilations in which each geologic material sample has one "best value" determination for each analyzed species, greatly improving speed and efficiency of use. Like the Alaska Geochemical Database (AGDB) before it, the AGDB2 was created and designed to compile and integrate geochemical data from Alaska in order to facilitate geologic mapping, petrologic studies, mineral resource assessments, definition of geochemical baseline values and statistics, environmental impact assessments, and studies in medical geology. This relational database, created from the Alaska Geochemical Database (AGDB) that was released in 2011, serves as a data archive in support of present and future Alaskan geologic and geochemical projects, and contains data tables in several different formats describing historical and new quantitative and qualitative geochemical analyses. The analytical results were determined by 85 laboratory and field analytical methods on 264,095 rock, sediment, soil, mineral and heavy-mineral concentrate samples. Most samples were collected by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) personnel and analyzed in USGS laboratories or, under contracts, in commercial analytical laboratories. These data represent analyses of samples collected as part of various USGS programs and projects from 1962 through 2009. In addition, mineralogical data from 18,138 nonmagnetic heavy mineral concentrate samples are included in this database. The AGDB2 includes historical geochemical data originally archived in the USGS Rock Analysis Storage System (RASS) database, used from the mid-1960s through the late 1980s and the USGS PLUTO database used from the mid-1970s through the mid-1990s. All of these data are currently maintained in the National Geochemical Database (NGDB). Retrievals from the NGDB were used to generate most of the AGDB data set. These data were checked for accuracy regarding sample location, sample media type, and analytical methods used. This arduous process of reviewing, verifying and, where necessary, editing all USGS geochemical data resulted in a significantly improved Alaska geochemical dataset. USGS data that were not previously in the NGDB because the data predate the earliest USGS geochemical databases, or were once excluded for programmatic reasons, are included here in the AGDB2 and will be added to the NGDB. The AGDB2 data provided here are the most accurate and complete to date, and should be useful for a wide variety of geochemical studies. The AGDB2 data provided in the linked database may be updated or changed periodically.

This dataset is about book series. It has 1 row and is filtered where the books is Excel 2010 power programming with VBA. It features 10 columns including number of authors, number of books, earliest publication date, and latest publication date.

In order to test hypotheses about groundwater flow under and into estuaries and the Atlantic Ocean, geophysical surveys, geophysical probing, submarine groundwater sampling, and sediment coring were conducted by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists at Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS) from 2004 through 2006. Coastal resource managers at CCNS and elsewhere are concerned about nutrients that are entering coastal waters via submarine groundwater discharge, which are contributing to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. The research carried out as part of the study described here was designed, in part, to help refine assumptions required by earlier versions of models about the nature of submarine groundwater flow and discharge at CCNS. This study was conducted in four phases, with a variety of field techniques and equipment employed in each phase. Phase 1 consisted of continuous resistivity profiling (CRP) surveys of the entire study area conducted in 2004. Phase 2 consisted of CRP ground-truthing via resistivity probe measurements and submarine groundwater sampling from hydraulically-drive piezometers using a barge in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2005. Phase 3 consisted of supplemental detailed CRP surveys in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2006. Finally, Phase 4 consisted of sediment coring and porewater extraction in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area later in 2006 to supplement the 2005 sampling.

1.Introduction

Sales data collection is a crucial aspect of any manufacturing industry as it provides valuable insights about the performance of products, customer behaviour, and market trends. By gathering and analysing this data, manufacturers can make informed decisions about product development, pricing, and marketing strategies in Internet of Things (IoT) business environments like the dairy supply chain.

One of the most important benefits of the sales data collection process is that it allows manufacturers to identify their most successful products and target their efforts towards those areas. For example, if a manufacturer could notice that a particular product is selling well in a certain region, this information could be utilised to develop new products, optimise the supply chain or improve existing ones to meet the changing needs of customers.

This dataset includes information about 7 of MEVGAL’s products [1]. According to the above information the data published will help researchers to understand the dynamics of the dairy market and its consumption patterns, which is creating the fertile ground for synergies between academia and industry and eventually help the industry in making informed decisions regarding product development, pricing and market strategies in the IoT playground. The use of this dataset could also aim to understand the impact of various external factors on the dairy market such as the economic, environmental, and technological factors. It could help in understanding the current state of the dairy industry and identifying potential opportunities for growth and development.

1. Citation

Please cite the following papers when using this dataset:

I. Siniosoglou, K. Xouveroudis, V. Argyriou, T. Lagkas, S. K. Goudos, K. E. Psannis and P. Sarigiannidis, "Evaluating the Effect of Volatile Federated Timeseries on Modern DNNs: Attention over Long/Short Memory," in the 12th International Conference on Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST 2023), April 2023, Accepted

1. Dataset Modalities

The dataset includes data regarding the daily sales of a series of dairy product codes offered by MEVGAL. In particular, the dataset includes information gathered by the logistics division and agencies within the industrial infrastructures overseeing the production of each product code. The products included in this dataset represent the daily sales and logistics of a variety of yogurt-based stock. Each of the different files include the logistics for that product on a daily basis for three years, from 2020 to 2022.

3.1 Data Collection

The process of building this dataset involves several steps to ensure that the data is accurate, comprehensive and relevant.

The first step is to determine the specific data that is needed to support the business objectives of the industry, i.e., in this publication’s case the daily sales data.

Once the data requirements have been identified, the next step is to implement an effective sales data collection method. In MEVGAL’s case this is conducted through direct communication and reports generated each day by representatives & selling points.

It is also important for MEVGAL to ensure that the data collection process conducted is in an ethical and compliant manner, adhering to data privacy laws and regulation. The industry also has a data management plan in place to ensure that the data is securely stored and protected from unauthorised access.

The published dataset is consisted of 13 features providing information about the date and the number of products that have been sold. Finally, the dataset was anonymised in consideration to the privacy requirement of the data owner (MEVGAL).

File

Period

Number of Samples (days)

product 1 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 1 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 1 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 2 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 2 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 2 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 3 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 3 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 3 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 4 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 4 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 4 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

364

product 5 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

363

product 5 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 5 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 6 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

362

product 6 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 6 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

product 7 2020.xlsx

01/01/2020–31/12/2020

362

product 7 2021.xlsx

01/01/2021–31/12/2021

364

product 7 2022.xlsx

01/01/2022–31/12/2022

365

3.2 Dataset Overview

The following table enumerates and explains the features included across all of the included files.

Feature

Description

Unit

Day

day of the month

-

Month

Month

-

Year

Year

-

daily_unit_sales

Daily sales - the amount of products, measured in units, that during that specific day were sold

units

previous_year_daily_unit_sales

Previous Year’s sales - the amount of products, measured in units, that during that specific day were sold the previous year

units

percentage_difference_daily_unit_sales

The percentage difference between the two above values

%

daily_unit_sales_kg

The amount of products, measured in kilograms, that during that specific day were sold

kg

previous_year_daily_unit_sales_kg

Previous Year’s sales - the amount of products, measured in kilograms, that during that specific day were sold, the previous year

kg

percentage_difference_daily_unit_sales_kg

The percentage difference between the two above values

kg

daily_unit_returns_kg

The percentage of the products that were shipped to selling points and were returned

%

previous_year_daily_unit_returns_kg

The percentage of the products that were shipped to selling points and were returned the previous year

%

points_of_distribution

The amount of sales representatives through which the product was sold to the market for this year

previous_year_points_of_distribution

The amount of sales representatives through which the product was sold to the market for the same day for the previous year

Table 1 – Dataset Feature Description

1. Structure and Format

4.1 Dataset Structure

The provided dataset has the following structure:

Where:

Name

Type

Property

Readme.docx

Report

A File that contains the documentation of the Dataset.

product X

Folder

A folder containing the data of a product X.

product X YYYY.xlsx

Data file

An excel file containing the sales data of product X for year YYYY.

Table 2 - Dataset File Description

1. Acknowledgement

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 957406 (TERMINET).

References

[1] MEVGAL is a Greek dairy production company

This dataset is about book series. It has 1 row and is filtered where the books is Financial modeling with Crystal Ball and Excel. It features 10 columns including number of authors, number of books, earliest publication date, and latest publication date.

The dataset includes a total of 2 independent data files, of which (1) text data is an Excel dataset, including 3 Excel files with a total of 486 pieces of data, containing 215 pieces of data on weekly shipment of fresh eggs by provinces (municipalities directly under the central government and autonomous regions) from 2018-2022, annual shipment and year-on-year rate of change of fresh eggs by the whole country and by provinces (municipalities directly under the central government and autonomous regions) from 2018-2022 10 data, and 261 data on weekly fresh egg shipments and year-on-year rate of change in the main marketing areas of fresh eggs nationwide, 2018-2022; (2) the image data is a picture dataset with a total of 109 pictures, including 75 line graphs of changes in weekly fresh egg shipments across the country and 15 provinces (municipalities directly under the central government and autonomous regions), 32 line graphs of yearly fresh egg shipments across the country and 15 provinces (municipalities directly under the central government and autonomous regions) and year-on-year rate of change in fresh egg shipments nationwide.32 line graphs, 2 line graphs of weekly fresh egg shipments and year-on-year change rate in the main marketing areas of the country.

In order to test hypotheses about groundwater flow under and into estuaries and the Atlantic Ocean, geophysical surveys, geophysical probing, submarine groundwater sampling, and sediment coring were conducted by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists at Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS) from 2004 through 2006. Coastal resource managers at CCNS and elsewhere are concerned about nutrients that are entering coastal waters via submarine groundwater discharge, which are contributing to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. The research carried out as part of the study described here was designed, in part, to help refine assumptions required by earlier versions of models about the nature of submarine groundwater flow and discharge at CCNS. This study was conducted in four phases, with a variety of field techniques and equipment employed in each phase. Phase 1 consisted of continuous resistivity profiling (CRP) surveys of the entire study area conducted in 2004. Phase 2 consisted of CRP ground-truthing via resistivity probe measurements and submarine groundwater sampling from hydraulically-drive piezometers using a barge in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2005. Phase 3 consisted of supplemental detailed CRP surveys in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2006. Finally, Phase 4 consisted of sediment coring and porewater extraction in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area later in 2006 to supplement the 2005 sampling.

Dataset accompanying the named paper. Please refer to the associated paper for full details of the experimental methods and parameters used to collect this data. Images are of the whole central cross section taken using an optical microscope. The excel spreadsheet contains both the data from three-point bend testing, and a range of data collected from optical microscope images analysed using thresholding analysis using ImageJ software. In all cases, the sample names beginning JS correspond to YBCO-Ag samples, those with JM-odd correspond to YBCO samples grown without additional liquid-rich powder and JM-even correspond to YBCO samples grown with the stated quantity of liquid-rich powder (growth processes are as referenced in the associated paper). The images in the powerpoint labelled 'fracture surfaces' are images of the fracture surfaces when tested in 3 point bending, as described in the paper.

This is a realistic and structured pizza sales dataset covering the time span from **2024 to 2025. ** Whether you're a beginner in data science, a student working on a machine learning project, or an experienced analyst looking to test out time series forecasting and dashboard building, this dataset is for you.

📁 What’s Inside? The dataset contains rich details from a pizza business including:

✅ Order Dates & Times ✅ Pizza Names & Categories (Veg, Non-Veg, Classic, Gourmet, etc.) ✅ Sizes (Small, Medium, Large, XL) ✅ Prices ✅ Order Quantities ✅ Customer Preferences & Trends

It is neatly organized in Excel format and easy to use with tools like Python (Pandas), Power BI, Excel, or Tableau.

💡** Why Use This Dataset?** This dataset is ideal for:

📈 Sales Analysis & Reporting 🧠 Machine Learning Models (demand forecasting, recommendations) 📅 Time Series Forecasting 📊 Data Visualization Projects 🍽️ Customer Behavior Analysis 🛒 Market Basket Analysis 📦 Inventory Management Simulations

🧠 Perfect For: Data Science Beginners & Learners BI Developers & Dashboard Designers MBA Students (Marketing, Retail, Operations) Hackathons & Case Study Competitions

pizza, sales data, excel dataset, retail analysis, data visualization, business intelligence, forecasting, time series, customer insights, machine learning, pandas, beginner friendly

The same FOI has been successfully fulfilled before for an earlier date range which finishes in 2021. If data is not held for the most recent months, please send the latest data which is held and detail the ending date for that data collection. Please send as an Excel Spreadsheet Date Range: 01/01/2022 to 01/01/2024