The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey. Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

In order to test hypotheses about groundwater flow under and into estuaries and the Atlantic Ocean, geophysical surveys, geophysical probing, submarine groundwater sampling, and sediment coring were conducted by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists at Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS) from 2004 through 2006. Coastal resource managers at CCNS and elsewhere are concerned about nutrients that are entering coastal waters via submarine groundwater discharge, which are contributing to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. The research carried out as part of the study described here was designed, in part, to help refine assumptions required by earlier versions of models about the nature of submarine groundwater flow and discharge at CCNS. This study was conducted in four phases, with a variety of field techniques and equipment employed in each phase. Phase 1 consisted of continuous resistivity profiling (CRP) surveys of the entire study area conducted in 2004. Phase 2 consisted of CRP ground-truthing via resistivity probe measurements and submarine groundwater sampling from hydraulically-drive piezometers using a barge in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2005. Phase 3 consisted of supplemental detailed CRP surveys in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2006. Finally, Phase 4 consisted of sediment coring and porewater extraction in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area later in 2006 to supplement the 2005 sampling.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time (FT) and part-time (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Excel. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Excel population, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Employment patterns: Within Excel, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 154 men and 106 women in the workforce. Among them, 106 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 51 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
• Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 0.94% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 23.53% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket.
• Annual income above $100,000: 15.09% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while 11.76% of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket.
• Refer to the research insights for more key observations on more income brackets ( Annual income under $24,999, Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999, Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999, Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999 and Annual income above $100,000) and employment types (full-time year-round and part-time)

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• $1 to $2,499 or loss
• $2,500 to $4,999
• $5,000 to $7,499
• $7,500 to $9,999
• $10,000 to $12,499
• $12,500 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $17,499
• $17,500 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $22,499
• $22,500 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $54,999
• $55,000 to $64,999
• $65,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Income Bracket: This column showcases 20 income brackets ranging from $1 to $100,000+..
• Full-Time Males: The count of males employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Males: The count of males employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket
• Full-Time Females: The count of females employed full-time year-round and earning within a specified income bracket
• Part-Time Females: The count of females employed part-time and earning within a specified income bracket

Employment type classifications include:

• Full-time, year-round: A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked full time (35 or more hours per week) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year.
• Part-time: A part-time worker is a person who worked less than 35 hours per week during the previous calendar year.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel median household income by race. You can refer the same here

The annual Retail store data CD-ROM is an easy-to-use tool for quickly discovering retail trade patterns and trends. The current product presents results from the 1999 and 2000 Annual Retail Store and Annual Retail Chain surveys. This product contains numerous cross-classified data tables using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The data tables provide access to a wide range of financial variables, such as revenues, expenses, inventory, sales per square footage (chain stores only) and the number of stores. Most data tables contain detailed information on industry (as low as 5-digit NAICS codes), geography (Canada, provinces and territories) and store type (chains, independents, franchises). The electronic product also contains survey metadata, questionnaires, information on industry codes and definitions, and the list of retail chain store respondents.

Spatial analysis and statistical summaries of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) provide land managers and decision makers with a general assessment of management intent for biodiversity protection, natural resource management, and recreation access across the nation. The PAD-US 3.0 Combined Fee, Designation, Easement feature class (with Military Lands and Tribal Areas from the Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries feature class) was modified to remove overlaps, avoiding overestimation in protected area statistics and to support user needs. A Python scripted process ("PADUS3_0_CreateVectorAnalysisFileScript.zip") associated with this data release prioritized overlapping designations (e.g. Wilderness within a National Forest) based upon their relative biodiversity conservation status (e.g. GAP Status Code 1 over 2), public access values (in the order of Closed, Restricted, Open, Unknown), and geodatabase load order (records are deliberately organized in the PAD-US full inventory with fee owned lands loaded before overlapping management designations, and easements). The Vector Analysis File ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics ( https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ) was clipped to the Census state boundary file to define the extent and serve as a common denominator for statistical summaries. Boundaries of interest to stakeholders (State, Department of the Interior Region, Congressional District, County, EcoRegions I-IV, Urban Areas, Landscape Conservation Cooperative) were incorporated into separate geodatabase feature classes to support various data summaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip") and Comma-separated Value (CSV) tables ("PADUS3_0SummaryStatistics_TabularData_CSV.zip") summarizing "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.zip" are provided as an alternative format and enable users to explore and download summary statistics of interest (Comma-separated Table [CSV], Microsoft Excel Workbook [.XLSX], Portable Document Format [.PDF] Report) from the PAD-US Lands and Inland Water Statistics Dashboard ( https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/pad-us-statistics ). In addition, a "flattened" version of the PAD-US 3.0 combined file without other extent boundaries ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFile_ClipCensus.zip") allow for other applications that require a representation of overall protection status without overlapping designation boundaries. The "PADUS3_0VectorAnalysis_State_Clip_CENSUS2020" feature class ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.gdb") is the source of the PAD-US 3.0 raster files (associated item of PAD-US 3.0 Spatial Analysis and Statistics, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9KLBB5D ). Note, the PAD-US inventory is now considered functionally complete with the vast majority of land protection types represented in some manner, while work continues to maintain updates and improve data quality (see inventory completeness estimates at: http://www.protectedlands.net/data-stewards/ ). In addition, changes in protected area status between versions of the PAD-US may be attributed to improving the completeness and accuracy of the spatial data more than actual management actions or new acquisitions. USGS provides no legal warranty for the use of this data. While PAD-US is the official aggregation of protected areas ( https://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html ), agencies are the best source of their lands data.

The ITEX experiment at Audkuluheidi was started in 1996 when control and OTC plots 1-5 were set up. In 1997 Control and OTC plots 6-10 were set up in the protected area (No Graze). Also in 1997, 10 control plots were set up in the adjacent grazed area (Graze). In 2000, all plots were sampled again. This dataset is in excel format. For more information, please see the readme file.

In order to test hypotheses about groundwater flow under and into estuaries and the Atlantic Ocean, geophysical surveys, geophysical probing, submarine groundwater sampling, and sediment coring were conducted by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists at Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS) from 2004 through 2006. Coastal resource managers at CCNS and elsewhere are concerned about nutrients that are entering coastal waters via submarine groundwater discharge, which are contributing to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. The research carried out as part of the study described here was designed, in part, to help refine assumptions required by earlier versions of models about the nature of submarine groundwater flow and discharge at CCNS. This study was conducted in four phases, with a variety of field techniques and equipment employed in each phase. Phase 1 consisted of continuous resistivity profiling (CRP) surveys of the entire study area conducted in 2004. Phase 2 consisted of CRP ground-truthing via resistivity probe measurements and submarine groundwater sampling from hydraulically-drive piezometers using a barge in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2005. Phase 3 consisted of supplemental detailed CRP surveys in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2006. Finally, Phase 4 consisted of sediment coring and porewater extraction in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area later in 2006 to supplement the 2005 sampling.

An Excel workbook containing tables of historical census data for a range of indicators dating back to 1961. Available in Excel 2003 (csv download) and Excel 2007-10 (excel download) formats.

Abstract

The documentation covers Enterprise Survey panel datasets that were collected in Slovenia in 2009, 2013 and 2019.

The Slovenia ES 2009 was conducted between 2008 and 2009. The Slovenia ES 2013 was conducted between March 2013 and September 2013. Finally, the Slovenia ES 2019 was conducted between December 2018 and November 2019. The objective of the Enterprise Survey is to gain an understanding of what firms experience in the private sector.

As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must take its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

Universe

As it is standard for the ES, the Slovenia ES was based on the following size stratification: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The sample for Slovenia ES 2009, 2013, 2019 were selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Manual for Slovenia 2009 ES and for Slovenia 2013 ES, and in the Sampling Note for 2019 Slovenia ES.

Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and oblast (region). The original sample designs with specific information of the industries and regions chosen are included in the attached Excel file (Sampling Report.xls.) for Slovenia 2009 ES. For Slovenia 2013 and 2019 ES, specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in the "The Slovenia 2013 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" and "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" reports respectively, Appendix E.

For the Slovenia 2009 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into manufacturing industries, services industries, and one residual (core) sector as defined in the sampling manual. Each industry had a target of 90 interviews. For the manufacturing industries sample sizes were inflated by about 17% to account for potential non-response cases when requesting sensitive financial data and also because of likely attrition in future surveys that would affect the construction of a panel. For the other industries (residuals) sample sizes were inflated by about 12% to account for under sampling in firms in service industries.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into one manufacturing industry, and two service industries (retail, and other services).

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. The original sample design with specific information of the industries and regions chosen is described in "The Slovenia 2019 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" report, Appendix C. Industry stratification was done as follows: Manufacturing – combining all the relevant activities (ISIC Rev. 4.0 codes 10-33), Retail (ISIC 47), and Other Services (ISIC 41-43, 45, 46, 49-53, 55, 56, 58, 61, 62, 79, 95).

For Slovenia 2009 and 2013 ES, size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

For Slovenia 2009 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions. These regions are Vzhodna Slovenija and Zahodna Slovenija. The Slovenia sample contains panel data. The wave 1 panel “Investment Climate Private Enterprise Survey implemented in Slovenia” consisted of 223 establishments interviewed in 2005. A total of 57 establishments have been re-interviewed in the 2008 Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey.

For Slovenia 2013 ES, regional stratification was defined in 2 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Slovenia.

Finally, for Slovenia 2019 ES, regional stratification was done across two regions: Eastern Slovenia (NUTS code SI03) and Western Slovenia (SI04).

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

Research instrument

Questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

Response rate

Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as (-8). b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary. However, there were clear cases of low response.

For 2009 and 2013 Slovenia ES, the survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Up to 4 attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals. Further research is needed on survey non-response in the Enterprise Surveys regarding potential introduction of bias.

For 2009, the number of contacted establishments per realized interview was 6.18. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The relatively low ratio of contacted establishments per realized interview (6.18) suggests that the main source of error in estimates in the Slovenia may be selection bias and not frame inaccuracy.

For 2013, the number of realized interviews per contacted establishment was 25%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 44%.

Finally, for 2019, the number of interviews per contacted establishments was 9.7%. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The share of rejections per contact was 75.2%.

What is IPGOD? The Intellectual Property Government Open Data (IPGOD) includes over 100 years of registry data on all intellectual property (IP) rights administered by IP Australia. It also has …Show full descriptionWhat is IPGOD? The Intellectual Property Government Open Data (IPGOD) includes over 100 years of registry data on all intellectual property (IP) rights administered by IP Australia. It also has derived information about the applicants who filed these IP rights, to allow for research and analysis at the regional, business and individual level. This is the 2019 release of IPGOD. How do I use IPGOD? IPGOD is large, with millions of data points across up to 40 tables, making them too large to open with Microsoft Excel. Furthermore, analysis often requires information from separate tables which would need specialised software for merging. We recommend that advanced users interact with the IPGOD data using the right tools with enough memory and compute power. This includes a wide range of programming and statistical software such as Tableau, Power BI, Stata, SAS, R, Python, and Scalar. IP Data Platform IP Australia is also providing free trials to a cloud-based analytics platform with the capabilities to enable working with large intellectual property datasets, such as the IPGOD, through the web browser, without any installation of software. IP Data Platform References The following pages can help you gain the understanding of the intellectual property administration and processes in Australia to help your analysis on the dataset. Patents Trade Marks Designs Plant Breeder’s Rights Updates Tables and columns Due to the changes in our systems, some tables have been affected. We have added IPGOD 225 and IPGOD 325 to the dataset! The IPGOD 206 table is not available this year. Many tables have been re-built, and as a result may have different columns or different possible values. Please check the data dictionary for each table before use. Data quality improvements Data quality has been improved across all tables. Null values are simply empty rather than '31/12/9999'. All date columns are now in ISO format 'yyyy-mm-dd'. All indicator columns have been converted to Boolean data type (True/False) rather than Yes/No, Y/N, or 1/0. All tables are encoded in UTF-8. All tables use the backslash \ as the escape character. The applicant name cleaning and matching algorithms have been updated. We believe that this year's method improves the accuracy of the matches. Please note that the "ipa_id" generated in IPGOD 2019 will not match with those in previous releases of IPGOD.

This excel contains results from the 2017 State of Narragansett Bay and Its Watershed Technical Report (nbep.org), Chapter 4: "Population." The methods for analyzing population were developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency ORD Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division in collaboration with the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program and other partners. Population rasters were generated using the USGS dasymetric mapping tool (see http://geography.wr.usgs.gov/science/dasymetric/index.htm) which uses land use data to distribute population data more accurately than simply within a census mapping unit. The 1990, 2000, and 2010 10m cell population density rasters were produced using Rhode Island state land use data, Massachusetts state land use, Connecticut NLCD land use data, and U.S. Census data. To generate a population estimate (number of persons) for any given area within the boundaries of this raster, NBEP used the the Zonal Statistics as Table tool to sum the 10m cell density values within a given zone dataset (e.g., watershed polygon layer). Results presented include population estimates (1990, 2000, 2010) as well as calculation of percent change (1990-2000;2000-2010;1990-2010).

** RD DATASET ** RD dataset was created by the images from the melanoma community on the internet (https://reddit.com/r/melanoma). Consecutive images were included using a python library (https://github.com/aliparlakci/bulk-downloader-for-reddit) from Jan 25, 2020, to July 30, 2021. The ground truth was voted by four dermatologists and one plastic surgeon while referring to the chief complaint and brief history. A total of 1,282 images (1,201 cases) were finally included. Because of the deleted cases by users, the links of 860 cases are valid in July 2021.

1. RD_RAW.xlsx The download links and ground truth of the RD dataset are included in this excel file. In addition, the raw data of the AI (Model Dermatology Build2021 - https://modelderm.com) and 32 laypersons were included.

2. v1_public.zip "v1_public.zip" includes the 1,282 lesional images (full-size). The 24 images that were excluded from the study are also available.

3. v1_private.zip is not available here. Wide field images are not available here. If the archive is needed for research purpose, please email to Dr. Han Seung Seog (whria78@gmail.com) or Dr Cristian Navarrete-Dechent (ctnavarr@gmail.com).

References - The Degradation of Performance of a State-of-the-art Skin Image Classifier When Applied to Patient-driven Internet Search - Scientific Report (in-press)

** Background normal test with the ISIC images ** ISIC dataset (https://www.isic-archive.com; Gallery -> 2018 JID Editorial images; 99 images; ISIC_0024262 and ISIC_0024261 are identical images and ISIC_0024262 was skipped) was used for the background normal test. We defined 10% area rectangle crop to “specialist-size crop”, and 5% area rectangle crop to “layperson-size crop” a) S-crops.zip: specialist-size crops Format: CROPNO_AGE(0~99)_GENDER(1=male,0=female)[m]_FILENAME.png b) L-crops.zip: layperson-size crops Format: CROPNO_AGE(0~99)_GENDER(1=male,0=female)[m]_FILENAME.png c) result_S.zip: Background normal test result using the specialist-size crops d) result_L.zip; Background normal test result using the layperson-size crops

Reference - Automated Dermatological Diagnosis: Hype or Reality? - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2018.04.040 - Multiclass Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: Progress but Still Room for Improvement - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.06.040

Description

This dataset contains the different measurement data that were obtained during and in the wake of the anomalous selenium-75 (Se-75) emission from the Belgian Reactor 2 (BR2) in 2019. These data were analysed by Frankemölle et al (2022), who showed that they paint a consistent picture of the Se-75 emission on both the time scale of the initial puff as well as on the time scale of the residual release. In the first tab of the Excel file, the different data included in the rest of the excel file are briefly discussed.

Included data

• On-site meteorological data
• In-stack measurements of Se-75 source term
• On-site measurements of ambient dose equivalent rates
• On-site deposition measurements
• On-site concentration measurements

Original publication

Frankemölle, J.P.K.W., Camps, J., De Meutter, P., Antoine, P., Delcloo, A.W., Vermeersch, F. and Meyers, J. (2022) 'Near-range atmospheric dispersion of an anomalous selenium-75 emission', Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 255*,* pp. 107012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107012

The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Frequency data summarizes health status indicators for active residents currently in nursing homes. The MDS is part of the Federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Care Area Assessments (CAAs) are part of this process, and provide the foundation upon which a resident's individual care plan is formulated. MDS assessments are completed for all residents in certified nursing homes, regardless of source of payment for the individual resident. MDS assessments are required for residents on admission to the nursing facility, periodically, and on discharge. All assessments are completed within specific guidelines and time frames. In most cases, participants in the assessment process are licensed health care professionals employed by the nursing home. MDS information is transmitted electronically by nursing homes to the national MDS database at CMS. When reviewing the MDS 3.0 Frequency files, some common software programs e.g., ‘Microsoft Excel’ might inaccurately strip leading zeros from designated code values (i.e., "01" becomes "1") or misinterpret code ranges as dates (i.e., O0600 ranges such as 02-04 are misread as 04-Feb). As each piece of software is unique, if you encounter an issue when reading the CSV file of Frequency data, please open the file in a plain text editor such as ‘Notepad’ or ‘TextPad’ to review the underlying data, before reaching out to CMS for assistance.

Identification of study species

We identified 40 marine species with documented shifts in range limits along the coastline (<15 km from shore) of North America, including plants, invertebrates, fish, a protist, and a bird. Of these, 26 species were compiled by Sorte et al. (2010), and we added 14 species from an updated literature review. We searched Google Scholar (on 08/20/2019) using this search string: marine "range expansion" species "range shift". We reviewed titles and, when appropriate, abstracts and text of the first 600 results, identifying 12 additional species from eight papers. We added two species (Brachidontes adamsianus and Mexacanthina lugubris) from our literature files and personal observations. We excluded migratory or pelagic species with large biogeographic ranges, for which it was difficult to confirm historical native ranges.

Review of published impacts

Evidence of species’ impacts was compiled from online database searches an...

A range of quarterly Excel spreadsheets and SuperTABLE datacubes. The spreadsheets contain broad level data covering all the major items of the Labour Force Survey in time series format, including seasonally adjusted and trend estimates. The datacubes contain more detailed and cross classified original data than the spreadsheets.

Data set for: Yamashita T, Vavladeli A, Pala A, Galan K, Crochet S, Petersen SSA, Petersen CCH (2018) Diverse long-range axonal projections of excitatory layer 2/3 neurons in mouse barrel cortex. Front Neuroanat 12: 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2018.00033

There are 25 files in this data upload:

1. '2018_Yamashita_FrontNeuroanat.pdf' - this a pdf version of the online publication.

2. 'Yamashita_Figure2_Quantification.xlsx' - this is a Microsoft Excel file giving the locations of high density axonal projections from layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons in the mouse C2 barrel column in the coordinate frame of Paxinos & Franklin (2001) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press. The data are plotted in Figure 2 of Yamashita et al., 2018.

3. 'Yamashita_Figure7_Quantification.xlsx' - this is a Microsoft Excel file giving the dendritic length, number of dendrites, number of dendritic nodes and total axonal length, as well as the axonal length in the different projection zones for each reconstructed neuron. The data are plotted in Figure 7 of Yamashita et al., 2018.

4. 'Yamashita_SupMov1_S2P_AP049.mov' - this is a QuickTime video file, showing the 3D structure of neuron AP049 featured in Figure 3 of Yamashita et al., 2018.

5. 'Yamashita_SupMov2_M1P_TY308.mov' - this is a QuickTime video file, showing the 3D structure of neuron TY308 featured in Figure 5 of Yamashita et al., 2018.

6. 'AV198.zip' - this zipped folder contains data relating to mouse AV198: a) 'AV198_stack.tif' the z-stack of whole-brain fluorescence images from expression of tdTomato in layer 2/3 neurons of the C2 barrel column of mouse AV198. b) 'AV198_ROI_Box.zip' can be loaded into FIJI (https://fiji.sc) and indicates projection regions by a box. c) 'AV198_ROI_Point.zip' can be loaded into FIJI (https://fiji.sc) and indicates projection regions by a point. d) 'AV198_Paxinos' is a folder showing the coronal fluorescent brain sections in pdf format overlaid on the equivalent drawing from Paxinos & Franklin (2001) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press.

7. 'AV199.zip' - same as 'AV198.zip' but for mouse AV199.

8. 'AV201.zip' - same as 'AV198.zip' but for mouse AV201.

9. 'AV202.zip' - same as 'AV198.zip' but for mouse AV202.

10. 'AV203.zip' - same as 'AV198.zip' but for mouse AV203.

11. 'AP042.ASC' - Neurolucida (http://www.mbfbioscience.com/neurolucida) data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse AP042. Brain contours are also traced.

12. 'AP044.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse AP044. Brain contours are also traced.

13. 'AP046.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse AP046. Brain contours are also traced.

14. 'AP047.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse AP047. Brain contours are also traced.

15. 'AP049.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse AP049. Brain contours are also traced.

16. 'TY220.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY220. Brain contours are also traced.

17. 'TY288.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY288. Brain contours are also traced.

18. 'TY300.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY300. Brain contours are also traced.

19. 'TY302.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY302. Brain contours are also traced.

20. 'TY308.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY308. Brain contours are also traced.

21. 'TY310.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY310. Brain contours are also traced.

22. 'TY337.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY337. Brain contours are also traced.

23. 'TY345.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY345. Brain contours are also traced.

24. 'TY367.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY367. Brain contours are also traced.

25. 'TY369.ASC' - Neurolucida data file of the 3D reconstruction of axon and dendrite from the single neuron labelled in mouse TY369. Brain contours are also traced.

This is a compilation of logs and data from Well 52-21 in the Roosevelt Hot Springs area in Utah. This well is also in the Utah FORGE study area. The file is in a compressed .zip format and there is a data inventory table (Excel spreadsheet) in the root folder that is a guide to the data that is accessible in subfolders.

description: In order to test hypotheses about groundwater flow under and into estuaries and the Atlantic Ocean, geophysical surveys, geophysical probing, submarine groundwater sampling, and sediment coring were conducted by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists at Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS) from 2004 through 2006. Coastal resource managers at CCNS and elsewhere are concerned about nutrients that are entering coastal waters via submarine groundwater discharge, which are contributing to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. The research carried out as part of the study described here was designed, in part, to help refine assumptions required by earlier versions of models about the nature of submarine groundwater flow and discharge at CCNS. This study was conducted in four phases, with a variety of field techniques and equipment employed in each phase. Phase 1 consisted of continuous resistivity profiling (CRP) surveys of the entire study area conducted in 2004. Phase 2 consisted of CRP ground-truthing via resistivity probe measurements and submarine groundwater sampling from hydraulically-drive piezometers using a barge in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2005. Phase 3 consisted of supplemental detailed CRP surveys in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2006. Finally, Phase 4 consisted of sediment coring and porewater extraction in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area later in 2006 to supplement the 2005 sampling.; abstract: In order to test hypotheses about groundwater flow under and into estuaries and the Atlantic Ocean, geophysical surveys, geophysical probing, submarine groundwater sampling, and sediment coring were conducted by U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists at Cape Cod National Seashore (CCNS) from 2004 through 2006. Coastal resource managers at CCNS and elsewhere are concerned about nutrients that are entering coastal waters via submarine groundwater discharge, which are contributing to eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. The research carried out as part of the study described here was designed, in part, to help refine assumptions required by earlier versions of models about the nature of submarine groundwater flow and discharge at CCNS. This study was conducted in four phases, with a variety of field techniques and equipment employed in each phase. Phase 1 consisted of continuous resistivity profiling (CRP) surveys of the entire study area conducted in 2004. Phase 2 consisted of CRP ground-truthing via resistivity probe measurements and submarine groundwater sampling from hydraulically-drive piezometers using a barge in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2005. Phase 3 consisted of supplemental detailed CRP surveys in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area in 2006. Finally, Phase 4 consisted of sediment coring and porewater extraction in the Salt Pond/Nauset Marsh area later in 2006 to supplement the 2005 sampling.

Abstract The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement. This dataset consists of an MS-Excel spreadsheet which contains worksheets for both NSW and QLD which provide summaries for the results of aquifer assignment. Dataset History Two worksheets …Show full descriptionAbstract The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement. This dataset consists of an MS-Excel spreadsheet which contains worksheets for both NSW and QLD which provide summaries for the results of aquifer assignment. Dataset History Two worksheets were created for Queensland and NSW to summarise the number of bores with different screen codes, respectively. A depth column was added in the summary table to present the depth range of all bores that are screened in a specific aquifer. Dataset Citation Bioregional Assessment Programme (2014) CLM - Bore assignments NSW and QLD summary tables. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 28 September 2017, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/f92af83d-3db0-4053-b766-4915609db12b. Dataset Ancestors Derived From CLM - Bore assignments QLD Derived From QLD Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, Groundwater Entitlements 20131204 Derived From QLD Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, Groundwater Entitlements linked to bores and NGIS v4 28072014 Derived From CLM - Bore assignments NSW Derived From QLD Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, Groundwater Entitlements linked to bores v3 03122014 Derived From NSW Office of Water - National Groundwater Information System 20140701 Derived From National Groundwater Information System (NGIS) v1.1