In this seminar, you will learn about ArcGIS Data Reviewer tools that allow you to automate, centrally manage, and improve your GIS data quality control processes.This seminar was developed to support the following:ArcGIS 10.0 For Desktop (ArcView, ArcEditor, Or ArcInfo)ArcGIS Data Reviewer for Desktop

How do you ensure your data is free of errors? While you may already leverage ArcGIS Data Reviewer for its automated validation capabilities, you might ocassionally encounter problems with certain challenging subsets of features. For example, think about a situation in which you expected an automated data check to return a certain error but it did not. You tried configuring the check over and over again, but did not figure out a method of automatically detecting the error.Visual review can help. Manually reviewing your data provides a way to find errors that are difficult to detect using automated methods, such as features that are missing, misplaced, miscoded, or redundant.The following graphic shows the topics that will be covered throughout the course. You will learn the associated workflows that take advantage of ArcGIS Data Reviewer functionality.After completing this course, you will be able to:Determine situations in which visual review is appropriate.Analyze a statistically significant sample.Create a QC grid and perform a systematic visual review.Indicate missing, misplaced, miscoded, or redundant features.Recognize how to find changes between versions.

Context

This Dataset is an updated version of the Amazon review dataset released in 2014. As in the previous version, this dataset includes reviews (ratings, text, helpfulness votes), product metadata (descriptions, category information, price, brand, and image features), and links (also viewed/also bought graphs). In addition, this version provides the following features:

• More reviews:

  • The total number of reviews is 233.1 million (142.8 million in 2014).

• New reviews:

  • Current data includes reviews in the range May 1996 - Oct 2018.

• Metadata: - We have added transaction metadata for each review shown on the review page.

  • Added more detailed metadata of the product landing page.

Acknowledgements

If you publish articles based on this dataset, please cite the following paper:

• Jianmo Ni, Jiacheng Li, Julian McAuley. Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fined-grained aspects. EMNLP, 2019.

Amazon Review 2023 is an updated version of the Amazon Review 2018 dataset. This dataset mainly includes reviews (ratings, text) and item metadata (desc- riptions, category information, price, brand, and images). Compared to the pre- vious versions, the 2023 version features larger size, newer reviews (up to Sep 2023), richer and cleaner meta data, and finer-grained timestamps (from day to milli-second).

You can analyze the Yelp's data the OpenWeb Ninja API provides to gain insights into the business world. This includes looking at market trends, identifying popular business categories, reading customer reviews and ratings, and understanding the factors that contribute to business success or failure.

The dataset includes all key business listings data & consumer review data:

Business Type, Description, Categories, Location, Consumer Review Data, Review Rating, Review Reactions, Review Author Information, Licenses, Highlights, and more!

For peer review purpose only.

Thank you very much.

Utilize our Amazon reviews dataset for diverse applications to enrich business strategies and market insights. Analyzing this dataset can aid in understanding customer behavior, product performance, and market trends, empowering organizations to refine their product and marketing strategies. Access the entire dataset or tailor a subset to fit your requirements. Popular use cases include: Product Performance Analysis: Analyze Amazon reviews to assess product performance, uncovering customer satisfaction levels, common issues, and highly praised features to inform product improvements and marketing messages. Customer Behavior Insights: Gain insights into customer behavior, purchasing patterns, and preferences, enabling more personalized marketing and product recommendations. Demand Forecasting: Leverage Amazon reviews to predict future product demand by analyzing historical review data and identifying trends, helping to optimize inventory management and sales strategies. Accessing and analyzing the Amazon reviews dataset supports market strategy optimization by leveraging insights to analyze key market trends and customer preferences, enhancing overall business decision-making.

Amazon Customer Reviews (a.k.a. Product Reviews) is one of Amazons iconic products. In a period of over two decades since the first review in 1995, millions of Amazon customers have contributed over a hundred million reviews to express opinions and describe their experiences regarding products on the Amazon.com website. This makes Amazon Customer Reviews a rich source of information for academic researchers in the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP), Information Retrieval (IR), and Machine Learning (ML), amongst others. Accordingly, we are releasing this data to further research in multiple disciplines related to understanding customer product experiences. Specifically, this dataset was constructed to represent a sample of customer evaluations and opinions, variation in the perception of a product across geographical regions, and promotional intent or bias in reviews.

Over 130+ million customer reviews are available to researchers as part of this release. The data is available in TSV files in the amazon-reviews-pds S3 bucket in AWS US East Region. Each line in the data files corresponds to an individual review (tab delimited, with no quote and escape characters).

Each Dataset contains the following columns:

• marketplace: 2 letter country code of the marketplace where the review was written.
• customer_id: Random identifier that can be used to aggregate reviews written by a single author.
• review_id: The unique ID of the review.
• product_id: The unique Product ID the review pertains to. In the multilingual dataset the reviews for the same product in different countries can be grouped by the same product_id.
• product_parent: Random identifier that can be used to aggregate reviews for the same product.
• product_title: Title of the product.
• product_category: Broad product category that can be used to group reviews (also used to group the dataset into coherent parts).
• star_rating: The 1-5 star rating of the review.
• helpful_votes: Number of helpful votes.
• total_votes: Number of total votes the review received.
• vine: Review was written as part of the Vine program.
• verified_purchase: The review is on a verified purchase.
• review_headline: The title of the review.
• review_body: The review text.
• review_date: The date the review was written.

Abstract: With the e-commerce growth, more people are buying products over the internet. To increase customer satisfaction, merchants provide spaces for product and service reviews. Products with positive reviews attract customers, while products with negative reviews lose customers. Following this idea, some individuals and corporations write fake reviews to promote their products and services or defame their competitors. The difficulty for finding these reviews was in the large amount of information available. One solution is to use data mining techniques and tools, such as the classification function. Exploring this situation, the present work evaluates classification techniques to identify fake reviews about products and services on the Internet. The research also presents a literature systematic review on fake reviews. The research used 8 classification algorithms. The algorithms were trained and tested with a hotels database. The CONCENSO algorithm presented the best result, with 88% in the precision indicator. After the first test, the algorithms classified reviews on another hotels database. To compare the results of this new classification, the Review Skeptic algorithm was used. The SVM and GLMNET algorithms presented the highest convergence with the Review Skeptic algorithm, classifying 83% of reviews with the same result. The research contributes by demonstrating the algorithms ability to understand consumers’ real reviews to products and services on the Internet. Another contribution is to be the pioneer in the investigation of fake reviews in Brazil and in production engineering.

This csv file contains a descriptive dataset of 617 scholarly journals that make use of a form of Open Peer Review (OPR) based on Open Reports and/or Open Reviewer Identities. The data file contains the following fields:

Journal Title

Year of First Identified OPR Occurrence (2001-2019)

High Level Discipline of the Journal (Humanities, Medical and Health Sciences, Multidisciplinary, Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, Technology)

Journal URL

Journal Publisher

Publisher Country

Use of Open Reports (Decided by Author, Decided by Editor, Mandated by Journal, None)

Use of Open Reviewer Identities (Decided by Reviewer, Mandated, None)

Notes that provide additional information about the journal

Have you ever assessed the quality of your data? Just as you would run spell check before publishing an important document, it is also beneficial to perform a quality control (QC) review before delivering data or map products. This course gives you the opportunity to learn how you can use ArcGIS Data Reviewer to manage and automate the quality control review process. While exploring the fundamental concepts of QC, you will gain hands-on experience configuring and running automated data checks. You will also practice organizing data review and building a comprehensive quality control model. You can easily modify and reuse this QC model over time as your organizational requirements change.After completing this course, you will be able to:Explain the importance of data quality.Select data checks to find specific errors.Apply a workflow to run individual data checks.Build a batch job to run cumulative data checks.

Yearly data of Quality Review ratings from 2005 to 2017

Air travel is one of the most used ways of transit in our daily lives. So it's no wonder that more and more people are sharing their experiences with airlines and airports using web-based online surveys. This dataset aims to do topic modeling and sentiment analysis on Skytrax (airlinequality.com) and Tripadvisor (tripadvisor.com) postings where there is a lot of interest and engagement from people who have used it or want to use it for airlines.

Access our Trustpilot Reviews Data in CSV Format, offering a comprehensive collection of customer reviews from Trustpilot.

This dataset includes detailed reviews, ratings, and feedback across various industries and businesses. Available in a convenient CSV format, it is ideal for market research, sentiment analysis, and competitive benchmarking.

Leverage this data to gain insights into customer satisfaction, identify trends, and enhance your business strategies. Whether you're analyzing consumer sentiment or conducting competitive analysis, this dataset provides valuable information to support your needs.

This dataset offers a listing of plan reviews performed by the City of Norfolk. It encompasses various review types, including Building Code, CBPA Review, Stormwater, Floodplain Review, Surveys, Design Review, Reservoir Review, Environmental Review, and others. This dataset provides valuable insights into the status and outcomes of these reviews. This dataset will be updated daily on weekdays.

Background: There is concern in the academic publishing community that it is becoming more difficult to secure reviews for peer-reviewed manuscripts, but much of this concern stems from anecdotal and rhetorical evidence. Methods: We examined the proportion of review requests that led to a completed review over a 6-year period (2009–2015) in a mid-tier biology journal (Molecular Ecology). We also re-analyzed previously published data from four other mid-tier ecology journals (Functional Ecology, Journal of Ecology, Journal of Animal Ecology, and Journal of Applied Ecology), looking at the same proportion over the period 2003 to 2010. Results: The data from Molecular Ecology showed no significant decrease through time in the proportion of requests that led to a review (proportion in 2009 = 0.47 (95 % CI = 0.43 to 0.52), proportion in 2015 = 0.44 (95 % CI = 0.40 to 0.48)). This proportion did decrease for three of the other ecology journals (changes in proportions from 2003 to 2010 = −0.10...

The IMDb Movie Reviews dataset is a binary sentiment analysis dataset consisting of 50,000 reviews from the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) labeled as positive or negative. The dataset contains an even number of positive and negative reviews. Only highly polarizing reviews are considered. A negative review has a score ≤ 4 out of 10, and a positive review has a score ≥ 7 out of 10. No more than 30 reviews are included per movie. The dataset contains additional unlabeled data.

This dataset contain video transcript from a limited number of youtubers who post Their review on iPhone 15, 15 plus , pro and pro max model . These are the videos used for the videos. Video Credits are owned by respective creators.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13244501%2Fc3bf6524f3ddfa376794de29f97651a1%2F_results_14_0.png?generation=1695205189424943&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13244501%2F645638973f5f8f5782cc8720ac4214c1%2F_results_15_0.png?generation=1695205202162850&alt=media" alt="">

For more check Here

Large Movie Review Dataset. This is a dataset for binary sentiment classification containing substantially more data than previous benchmark datasets. We provide a set of 25,000 highly polar movie reviews for training, and 25,000 for testing. There is additional unlabeled data for use as well.

To use this dataset:

import tensorflow_datasets as tfds

ds = tfds.load('imdb_reviews', split='train')
for ex in ds.take(4):
 print(ex)

See the guide for more informations on tensorflow_datasets.

This dataset contains a curated sample of 20,000 English-language user reviews sourced exclusively from Trustpilot.com. It is a representative subset of our larger collection containing over 1 million Trustpilot reviews across various industries and companies.

🗂️ Dataset Overview Source: Trustpilot Total Records: 20,000 Language: English