The goal of this research is to examine direct answers in Google web search engine. Dataset was collected using Senuto (https://www.senuto.com/). Senuto is as an online tool, that extracts data on websites visibility from Google search engine.

Dataset contains the following elements:

keyword,

number of monthly searches,

featured domain,

featured main domain,

featured position,

featured type,

featured url,

content,

content length.

Dataset with visibility structure has 743 798 keywords that were resulting in SERPs with direct answer.

The COVID-19 Search Trends symptoms dataset shows aggregated, anonymized trends in Google searches for a broad set of health symptoms, signs, and conditions. The dataset provides a daily or weekly time series for each region showing the relative volume of searches for each symptom. This dataset is intended to help researchers to better understand the impact of COVID-19. It shouldn't be used for medical diagnostic, prognostic, or treatment purposes. It also isn't intended to be used for guidance on personal travel plans. To learn more about the dataset, how we generate it and preserve privacy, read the data documentation . To visualize the data, try exploring these interactive charts and map of symptom search trends . As of Dec. 15, 2020, the dataset was expanded to include trends for Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. This expanded data is available in new tables that provide data at country and two subregional levels. We will not be updating existing state/county tables going forward. All bytes processed in queries against this dataset will be zeroed out, making this part of the query free. Data joined with the dataset will be billed at the normal rate to prevent abuse. After September 15, queries over these datasets will revert to the normal billing rate. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data was reported at 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 24 Dec 2024 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Laos – Table LA.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

This represents the top 10 searches that visitors have conducted on via Google Search. The data represents the most recent one-month period. *Note: On July 1, 2023, standard Universal Analytics properties will stop processing data.

500k User Session Collection This collection is distributed for NON-COMMERCIAL RESEARCH USE ONLY. Any application of this collection for commercial purposes is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. #### Brief description: This collection consists of ~20M web queries collected from ~650k users over three months. The data is sorted by anonymous user ID and sequentially arranged. The goal of this collection is to provide real query log data that is based on real users. It could be used for personalization, query reformulation or other types of search research. The data set includes AnonID, Query, QueryTime, ItemRank, ClickURL. AnonID - an anonymous user ID number. Query - the query issued by the user, case shifted with most punctuation removed. QueryTime - the time at which the query was submitted for search. ItemRank - if the user clicked on a search result, the rank of the item on which they clicked is listed. ClickURL - if the user clicked on a search result, the domain portion of the URL i

China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data was reported at 8.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 8.000 Score for 13 May 2025. China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 70.000 Score in 22 Jan 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 02 May 2025. China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s China – Table CN.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

Global Google Trends Internet Search Data 2022 to 2024 [RSVs] for fasting, diet, nutrition, liver, GLP-1 RAs

Search for a business by name. You can obtain business information and then proceed to purchase a certificate of good standing or other documents. The purpose of this search is simply to determine whether a company/entity exists and to provide basic information on the company/entity.

Minute-by-minute updated keyword database from Google, featuring 3 trending search terms

Google Search Trends: Travel & Accommodations: Booking.com data was reported at 2.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Travel & Accommodations: Booking.com data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 19.000 Score in 21 Apr 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 02 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Travel & Accommodations: Booking.com data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s China – Table CN.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

In January 2025, Google remained by far the most popular search engine in the UK, holding a market share of ***** percent across all devices. That month, Bing had a market share of approximately **** percent in second place, followed by Yahoo! with approximately **** percent. The EU vs Google Despite Google’s dominance of the search engine market, maintaining its position at the top has not been a smooth ride. Google’s market share saw a decline in the summer of 2018, plummeting to an all-time-low in July. The search engine experienced a similar dip in June and July 2017. These two low points coincided with the European Commission’s antitrust charges against the company, both of which were unprecedented in the now decade-long duel between both parties. As skepticism towards search engine platforms grows in line with public concern regarding censorship and data privacy, alternative services like Duckduckgo offer users both information protection and unfiltered results. Despite this, it still held less than *** percent of the industry’s market share as of June 2021. Perception of fake news in the UK According to a questionnaire conducted in the United Kingdom in 2018, **** percent of respondents had come across inaccurate news on social media at least once before. Rising concerns over fake news, or information which has been manipulated to influence the public has been a hot topic in recent years. The younger generation however, remains skeptical with nearly **** of Generation Z claiming to be either unconcerned about fake news, or believed that it did not exist altogether.

Search engines, which collect, organize and display knowledge of the internet, are the backbone of the information age and have helped popularize the ad-supported attention economy that prevails throughout the internet. From 2019 to 2024, spending on internet advertising has maintained strong momentum as consumer demand for internet access continued to surge, driven by the adoption of LTE, 5G and unlimited mobile data plans. Despite COVID-19 depressing total advertising expenditure, digital advertising continued to grow as consumers practically lived online while stay-at-home orders were in place. As a result, search engine revenue from advertising is slated to mount at a CAGR of 10.4% to $287.5 billion, including an anticipated hike of 8.4% in 2024, with profit at 18.7%. The search engine industry is fundamentally differentiated from the rest of the economy by its advertising sales framework, market aggregation and high interconnection with other industries. While search is a consumer product, search revenue comes from a platform's desirability to advertisers, not users. Search platforms must balance providing the best search experience while integrating as many advertisements as possible. This difficult balance is challenging to achieve because advertising dollars tend to scale best on the leading search platform, increasing aggregation forces for search providers. The market leaders in search, Google and Microsoft, have met this balance by using advertising revenue to grow a suite of services designed to collect extensive behavior information on and off the search website. This data then targets ads to hyper-specific markets, funding the search business model. As the number of hours spent on the internet continues to mount, search engine revenue is poised to climb at a CAGR of 7.1% to $404.9 billion through the end of 2029. Advertisers will rely increasingly on search engine marketing due to its cost-effectiveness and efficiency advantages over traditional media. With proper analytics software installed, marketers can track which terms, advertisements and websites are the most effective, enabling incremental real-time tweaks and improvements in advertising campaigns. Artificial intelligence has promised to change the purpose of search from navigation to finding answers, which will change the structure of the internet, just as search engine providers have done many times before.

Success.ai’s Education Industry Data provides access to comprehensive profiles of global professionals in the education sector. Sourced from over 700 million verified LinkedIn profiles, this dataset includes actionable insights and verified contact details for teachers, school administrators, university leaders, and other decision-makers. Whether your goal is to collaborate with educational institutions, market innovative solutions, or recruit top talent, Success.ai ensures your efforts are supported by accurate, enriched, and continuously updated data.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Education Industry Data? 1. Comprehensive Professional Profiles Access verified LinkedIn profiles of teachers, school principals, university administrators, curriculum developers, and education consultants. AI-validated profiles ensure 99% accuracy, reducing bounce rates and enabling effective communication. 2. Global Coverage Across Education Sectors Includes professionals from public schools, private institutions, higher education, and educational NGOs. Covers markets across North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Africa for a truly global reach. 3. Continuously Updated Dataset Real-time updates reflect changes in roles, organizations, and industry trends, ensuring your outreach remains relevant and effective. 4. Tailored for Educational Insights Enriched profiles include work histories, academic expertise, subject specializations, and leadership roles for a deeper understanding of the education sector.

Data Highlights: 700M+ Verified LinkedIn Profiles: Access a global network of education professionals. 100M+ Work Emails: Direct communication with teachers, administrators, and decision-makers. Enriched Professional Histories: Gain insights into career trajectories, institutional affiliations, and areas of expertise. Industry-Specific Segmentation: Target professionals in K-12 education, higher education, vocational training, and educational technology.

Key Features of the Dataset: 1. Education Sector Profiles Identify and connect with teachers, professors, academic deans, school counselors, and education technologists. Engage with individuals shaping curricula, institutional policies, and student success initiatives. 2. Detailed Institutional Insights Leverage data on school sizes, student demographics, geographic locations, and areas of focus. Tailor outreach to align with institutional goals and challenges. 3. Advanced Filters for Precision Targeting Refine searches by region, subject specialty, institution type, or leadership role. Customize campaigns to address specific needs, such as professional development or technology adoption. 4. AI-Driven Enrichment Enhanced datasets include actionable details for personalized messaging and targeted engagement. Highlight educational milestones, professional certifications, and key achievements.

Strategic Use Cases: 1. Product Marketing and Outreach Promote educational technology, learning platforms, or training resources to teachers and administrators. Engage with decision-makers driving procurement and curriculum development. 2. Collaboration and Partnerships Identify institutions for collaborations on research, workshops, or pilot programs. Build relationships with educators and administrators passionate about innovative teaching methods. 3. Talent Acquisition and Recruitment Target HR professionals and academic leaders seeking faculty, administrative staff, or educational consultants. Support hiring efforts for institutions looking to attract top talent in the education sector. 4. Market Research and Strategy Analyze trends in education systems, curriculum development, and technology integration to inform business decisions. Use insights to adapt products and services to evolving educational needs.

Why Choose Success.ai? 1. Best Price Guarantee Access industry-leading Education Industry Data at unmatched pricing for cost-effective campaigns and strategies. 2. Seamless Integration Easily integrate verified data into CRMs, recruitment platforms, or marketing systems using downloadable formats or APIs. 3. AI-Validated Accuracy Depend on 99% accurate data to reduce wasted outreach and maximize engagement rates. 4. Customizable Solutions Tailor datasets to specific educational fields, geographic regions, or institutional types to meet your objectives.

Strategic APIs for Enhanced Campaigns: 1. Data Enrichment API Enrich existing records with verified education professional profiles to enhance engagement and targeting. 2. Lead Generation API Automate lead generation for a consistent pipeline of qualified professionals in the education sector. Success.ai’s Education Industry Data enables you to connect with educators, administrators, and decision-makers transforming global...

Brand performance data collected from AI search platforms for the query "combine facebook and google ads data".

Brand performance data collected from AI search platforms for the query "Google Discover traffic best practices".

The transition from analog to digital archives and the recent explosion of online content offers researchers novel ways of engaging with data. The crucial question for ensuring a balance between the supply and demand-side of data, is whether this trend connects to existing scholarly practices and to the average search skills of researchers. To gain insight into this process a survey was conducted among nearly three hundred (N= 288) humanities scholars in the Netherlands and Belgium with the aim of finding answers to the following questions: 1) To what extent are digital databases and archives used? 2) What are the preferences in search functionalities 3) Are there differences in search strategies between novices and experts of information retrieval? Our results show that while scholars actively engage in research online they mainly search for text and images. General search systems such as Google and JSTOR are predominant, while large-scale collections such as Europeana are rarely consulted. Searching with keywords is the dominant search strategy and advanced search options are rarely used. When comparing novice and more experienced searchers, the first tend to have a more narrow selection of search engines, and mostly use keywords. Our overall findings indicate that Google is the key player among available search engines. This dominant use illustrates the paradoxical attitude of scholars toward Google: while transparency of provenance and selection are deemed key academic requirements, the workings of the Google algorithm remain unclear. We conclude that Google introduces a black box into digital scholarly practices, indicating scholars will become increasingly dependent on such black boxed algorithms. This calls for a reconsideration of the academic principles of provenance and context.

I. Hall

This dataset includes the detailed values and scripts used to study behavioral aspects of users searching online for Art and Culture by analyzing quantitative data collected by the Art Boulevard search engine using machine learning techniques. This dataset is part of the core methodology, results and discussion sections of the research paper entitled "Investigating Online Art Search through Quantitative Behavioral Data and Machine Learning Techniques"

Brand performance data collected from AI search platforms for the query "how to speed up analytics queries".

Data used for searching on sorted data benchmark.