Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data was reported at 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 24 Dec 2024 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Laos – Table LA.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

500k User Session Collection This collection is distributed for NON-COMMERCIAL RESEARCH USE ONLY. Any application of this collection for commercial purposes is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. #### Brief description: This collection consists of ~20M web queries collected from ~650k users over three months. The data is sorted by anonymous user ID and sequentially arranged. The goal of this collection is to provide real query log data that is based on real users. It could be used for personalization, query reformulation or other types of search research. The data set includes AnonID, Query, QueryTime, ItemRank, ClickURL. AnonID - an anonymous user ID number. Query - the query issued by the user, case shifted with most punctuation removed. QueryTime - the time at which the query was submitted for search. ItemRank - if the user clicked on a search result, the rank of the item on which they clicked is listed. ClickURL - if the user clicked on a search result, the domain portion of the URL i

The goal of this research is to examine direct answers in Google web search engine. Dataset was collected using Senuto (https://www.senuto.com/). Senuto is as an online tool, that extracts data on websites visibility from Google search engine.

Dataset contains the following elements:

keyword,

number of monthly searches,

featured domain,

featured main domain,

featured position,

featured type,

featured url,

content,

content length.

Dataset with visibility structure has 743 798 keywords that were resulting in SERPs with direct answer.

Data from the Interactive Social Book Search Track Series 2014-2016

Data used for searching on sorted data benchmark.

The COVID-19 Search Trends symptoms dataset shows aggregated, anonymized trends in Google searches for a broad set of health symptoms, signs, and conditions. The dataset provides a daily or weekly time series for each region showing the relative volume of searches for each symptom. This dataset is intended to help researchers to better understand the impact of COVID-19. It shouldn't be used for medical diagnostic, prognostic, or treatment purposes. It also isn't intended to be used for guidance on personal travel plans. To learn more about the dataset, how we generate it and preserve privacy, read the data documentation . To visualize the data, try exploring these interactive charts and map of symptom search trends . As of Dec. 15, 2020, the dataset was expanded to include trends for Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. This expanded data is available in new tables that provide data at country and two subregional levels. We will not be updating existing state/county tables going forward. All bytes processed in queries against this dataset will be zeroed out, making this part of the query free. Data joined with the dataset will be billed at the normal rate to prevent abuse. After September 15, queries over these datasets will revert to the normal billing rate. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

Google Search Trends: Jobs Searching: LinkedIn data was reported at 0.000 Score in 15 May 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.000 Score for 14 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Jobs Searching: LinkedIn data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 15 May 2025, with 1262 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 19 Mar 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 15 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Jobs Searching: LinkedIn data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Antigua and Barbuda – Table AG.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

Search for a business by name. You can obtain business information and then proceed to purchase a certificate of good standing or other documents. The purpose of this search is simply to determine whether a company/entity exists and to provide basic information on the company/entity.

The transition from analog to digital archives and the recent explosion of online content offers researchers novel ways of engaging with data. The crucial question for ensuring a balance between the supply and demand-side of data, is whether this trend connects to existing scholarly practices and to the average search skills of researchers. To gain insight into this process a survey was conducted among nearly three hundred (N= 288) humanities scholars in the Netherlands and Belgium with the aim of finding answers to the following questions: 1) To what extent are digital databases and archives used? 2) What are the preferences in search functionalities 3) Are there differences in search strategies between novices and experts of information retrieval? Our results show that while scholars actively engage in research online they mainly search for text and images. General search systems such as Google and JSTOR are predominant, while large-scale collections such as Europeana are rarely consulted. Searching with keywords is the dominant search strategy and advanced search options are rarely used. When comparing novice and more experienced searchers, the first tend to have a more narrow selection of search engines, and mostly use keywords. Our overall findings indicate that Google is the key player among available search engines. This dominant use illustrates the paradoxical attitude of scholars toward Google: while transparency of provenance and selection are deemed key academic requirements, the workings of the Google algorithm remain unclear. We conclude that Google introduces a black box into digital scholarly practices, indicating scholars will become increasingly dependent on such black boxed algorithms. This calls for a reconsideration of the academic principles of provenance and context.

This represents the top 10 searches that visitors have conducted on via Google Search. The data represents the most recent one-month period. *Note: On July 1, 2023, standard Universal Analytics properties will stop processing data.

This dataset includes the detailed values and scripts used to study behavioral aspects of users searching online for Art and Culture by analyzing quantitative data collected by the Art Boulevard search engine using machine learning techniques. This dataset is part of the core methodology, results and discussion sections of the research paper entitled "Investigating Online Art Search through Quantitative Behavioral Data and Machine Learning Techniques"

This interface joins the Kepler Target Catalog (KTC) with other tables to allow users to access the Kepler data archive. Observed Kepler targets are included with their associated data set names. Since most of the Kepler light curve data is still proprietary, public data can be found by searching for release dates earlier than todays date.

Google Search Trends: Computer & Electronics: Samsung Electronics data was reported at 17.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 17.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Computer & Electronics: Samsung Electronics data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 09 Apr 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 02 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Computer & Electronics: Samsung Electronics data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Saint Lucia – Table LC.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

withpi/search-query-optimizer-companies-case-data-v01_single_st_tokenized_32k_111 dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community

I. Hall

withpi/search-query-optimizer-companies-case-data-v01-formatted dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community

The HDoutliers algorithm is a powerful unsupervised algorithm for detecting anomalies in high-dimensional data, with a strong theoretical foundation. However, it suffers from some limitations that significantly hinder its performance level, under certain circumstances. In this article, we propose an algorithm that addresses these limitations. We define an anomaly as an observation where its k-nearest neighbor distance with the maximum gap is significantly different from what we would expect if the distribution of k-nearest neighbors with the maximum gap is in the maximum domain of attraction of the Gumbel distribution. An approach based on extreme value theory is used for the anomalous threshold calculation. Using various synthetic and real datasets, we demonstrate the wide applicability and usefulness of our algorithm, which we call the stray algorithm. We also demonstrate how this algorithm can assist in detecting anomalies present in other data structures using feature engineering. We show the situations where the stray algorithm outperforms the HDoutliers algorithm both in accuracy and computational time. This framework is implemented in the open source R package stray. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Search engines, which collect, organize and display knowledge of the internet, are the backbone of the information age and have helped popularize the ad-supported attention economy that prevails throughout the internet. From 2019 to 2024, spending on internet advertising has maintained strong momentum as consumer demand for internet access continued to surge, driven by the adoption of LTE, 5G and unlimited mobile data plans. Despite COVID-19 depressing total advertising expenditure, digital advertising continued to grow as consumers practically lived online while stay-at-home orders were in place. As a result, search engine revenue from advertising is slated to mount at a CAGR of 10.4% to $287.5 billion, including an anticipated hike of 8.4% in 2024, with profit at 18.7%. The search engine industry is fundamentally differentiated from the rest of the economy by its advertising sales framework, market aggregation and high interconnection with other industries. While search is a consumer product, search revenue comes from a platform's desirability to advertisers, not users. Search platforms must balance providing the best search experience while integrating as many advertisements as possible. This difficult balance is challenging to achieve because advertising dollars tend to scale best on the leading search platform, increasing aggregation forces for search providers. The market leaders in search, Google and Microsoft, have met this balance by using advertising revenue to grow a suite of services designed to collect extensive behavior information on and off the search website. This data then targets ads to hyper-specific markets, funding the search business model. As the number of hours spent on the internet continues to mount, search engine revenue is poised to climb at a CAGR of 7.1% to $404.9 billion through the end of 2029. Advertisers will rely increasingly on search engine marketing due to its cost-effectiveness and efficiency advantages over traditional media. With proper analytics software installed, marketers can track which terms, advertisements and websites are the most effective, enabling incremental real-time tweaks and improvements in advertising campaigns. Artificial intelligence has promised to change the purpose of search from navigation to finding answers, which will change the structure of the internet, just as search engine providers have done many times before.

Explore real-time online search and web trends with Success.ai’s comprehensive data on search engines and B2B intent. Uncover actionable insights for competitive intelligence and targeted marketing. Guaranteed best price and quality.

Multivariate Time-Series (MTS) are ubiquitous, and are generated in areas as disparate as sensor recordings in aerospace systems, music and video streams, medical monitoring, and financial systems. Domain experts are often interested in searching for interesting multivariate patterns from these MTS databases which can contain up to several gigabytes of data. Surprisingly, research on MTS search is very limited. Most existing work only supports queries with the same length of data, or queries on a fixed set of variables. In this paper, we propose an efficient and flexible subsequence search framework for massive MTS databases, that, for the first time, enables querying on any subset of variables with arbitrary time delays between them. We propose two provably correct algorithms to solve this problem (1) an R-tree Based Search (RBS) which uses Minimum Bounding Rectangles (MBR) to organize the subsequences, and (2) a List Based Search (LBS) algorithm which uses sorted lists for indexing. We demonstrate the performance of these algorithms using two large MTS databases from the aviation domain, each containing several millions of observations. Both these tests show that our algorithms have very high prune rates (>95%) thus needing actual disk access for only less than 5% of the observations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first flexible MTS search algorithm capable of subsequence search on any subset of variables. Moreover, MTS subsequence search has never been attempted on datasets of the size we have used in this paper.