As high-throughput methods become more common, training undergraduates to analyze data must include having them generate informative summaries of large datasets. This flexible case study provides an opportunity for undergraduate students to become familiar with the capabilities of R programming in the context of high-throughput evolutionary data collected using macroarrays. The story line introduces a recent graduate hired at a biotech firm and tasked with analysis and visualization of changes in gene expression from 20,000 generations of the Lenski Lab’s Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE). Our main character is not familiar with R and is guided by a coworker to learn about this platform. Initially this involves a step-by-step analysis of the small Iris dataset built into R which includes sepal and petal length of three species of irises. Practice calculating summary statistics and correlations, and making histograms and scatter plots, prepares the protagonist to perform similar analyses with the LTEE dataset. In the LTEE module, students analyze gene expression data from the long-term evolutionary experiments, developing their skills in manipulating and interpreting large scientific datasets through visualizations and statistical analysis. Prerequisite knowledge is basic statistics, the Central Dogma, and basic evolutionary principles. The Iris module provides hands-on experience using R programming to explore and visualize a simple dataset; it can be used independently as an introduction to R for biological data or skipped if students already have some experience with R. Both modules emphasize understanding the utility of R, rather than creation of original code. Pilot testing showed the case study was well-received by students and faculty, who described it as a clear introduction to R and appreciated the value of R for visualizing and analyzing large datasets.

ABOUT DATASET

This is the R markdown notebook. It contains step by step guide for working on Data Analysis with R. It helps you with installing the relevant packages and how to load them. it also provides a detailed summary of the "dplyr" commands that you can use to manipulate your data in the R environment.

Anyone new to R and wish to carry out some data analysis on R can check it out!

This dataset is about books. It has 1 row and is filtered where the book is An introduction to data analysis in R : hands-on coding, data mining, visualization and statistics from scratch. It features 7 columns including author, publication date, language, and book publisher.

Each R script replicates all of the example code from one chapter from the book. All required data for each script are also uploaded, as are all data used in the practice problems at the end of each chapter. The data are drawn from a wide array of sources, so please cite the original work if you ever use any of these data sets for research purposes.

This book is written for statisticians, data analysts, programmers, researchers, teachers, students, professionals, and general consumers on how to perform different types of statistical data analysis for research purposes using the R programming language. R is an open-source software and object-oriented programming language with a development environment (IDE) called RStudio for computing statistics and graphical displays through data manipulation, modelling, and calculation. R packages and supported libraries provides a wide range of functions for programming and analyzing of data. Unlike many of the existing statistical softwares, R has the added benefit of allowing the users to write more efficient codes by using command-line scripting and vectors. It has several built-in functions and libraries that are extensible and allows the users to define their own (customized) functions on how they expect the program to behave while handling the data, which can also be stored in the simple object system.For all intents and purposes, this book serves as both textbook and manual for R statistics particularly in academic research, data analytics, and computer programming targeted to help inform and guide the work of the R users or statisticians. It provides information about different types of statistical data analysis and methods, and the best scenarios for use of each case in R. It gives a hands-on step-by-step practical guide on how to identify and conduct the different parametric and non-parametric procedures. This includes a description of the different conditions or assumptions that are necessary for performing the various statistical methods or tests, and how to understand the results of the methods. The book also covers the different data formats and sources, and how to test for reliability and validity of the available datasets. Different research experiments, case scenarios and examples are explained in this book. It is the first book to provide a comprehensive description and step-by-step practical hands-on guide to carrying out the different types of statistical analysis in R particularly for research purposes with examples. Ranging from how to import and store datasets in R as Objects, how to code and call the methods or functions for manipulating the datasets or objects, factorization, and vectorization, to better reasoning, interpretation, and storage of the results for future use, and graphical visualizations and representations. Thus, congruence of Statistics and Computer programming for Research.

In the last decade, a plethora of algorithms have been developed for spatial ecology studies. In our case, we use some of these codes for underwater research work in applied ecology analysis of threatened endemic fishes and their natural habitat. For this, we developed codes in Rstudio® script environment to run spatial and statistical analyses for ecological response and spatial distribution models (e.g., Hijmans & Elith, 2017; Den Burg et al., 2020). The employed R packages are as follows: caret (Kuhn et al., 2020), corrplot (Wei & Simko, 2017), devtools (Wickham, 2015), dismo (Hijmans & Elith, 2017), gbm (Freund & Schapire, 1997; Friedman, 2002), ggplot2 (Wickham et al., 2019), lattice (Sarkar, 2008), lattice (Musa & Mansor, 2021), maptools (Hijmans & Elith, 2017), modelmetrics (Hvitfeldt & Silge, 2021), pander (Wickham, 2015), plyr (Wickham & Wickham, 2015), pROC (Robin et al., 2011), raster (Hijmans & Elith, 2017), RColorBrewer (Neuwirth, 2014), Rcpp (Eddelbeuttel & Balamura, 2018), rgdal (Verzani, 2011), sdm (Naimi & Araujo, 2016), sf (e.g., Zainuddin, 2023), sp (Pebesma, 2020) and usethis (Gladstone, 2022).

It is important to follow all the codes in order to obtain results from the ecological response and spatial distribution models. In particular, for the ecological scenario, we selected the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and for the geographic scenario we selected DOMAIN, also known as Gower's metric (Carpenter et al., 1993). We selected this regression method and this distance similarity metric because of its adequacy and robustness for studies with endemic or threatened species (e.g., Naoki et al., 2006). Next, we explain the statistical parameterization for the codes immersed in the GLM and DOMAIN running:

In the first instance, we generated the background points and extracted the values of the variables (Code2_Extract_values_DWp_SC.R). Barbet-Massin et al. (2012) recommend the use of 10,000 background points when using regression methods (e.g., Generalized Linear Model) or distance-based models (e.g., DOMAIN). However, we considered important some factors such as the extent of the area and the type of study species for the correct selection of the number of points (Pers. Obs.). Then, we extracted the values of predictor variables (e.g., bioclimatic, topographic, demographic, habitat) in function of presence and background points (e.g., Hijmans and Elith, 2017).

Subsequently, we subdivide both the presence and background point groups into 75% training data and 25% test data, each group, following the method of Soberón & Nakamura (2009) and Hijmans & Elith (2017). For a training control, the 10-fold (cross-validation) method is selected, where the response variable presence is assigned as a factor. In case that some other variable would be important for the study species, it should also be assigned as a factor (Kim, 2009).

After that, we ran the code for the GBM method (Gradient Boost Machine; Code3_GBM_Relative_contribution.R and Code4_Relative_contribution.R), where we obtained the relative contribution of the variables used in the model. We parameterized the code with a Gaussian distribution and cross iteration of 5,000 repetitions (e.g., Friedman, 2002; kim, 2009; Hijmans and Elith, 2017). In addition, we considered selecting a validation interval of 4 random training points (Personal test). The obtained plots were the partial dependence blocks, in function of each predictor variable.

Subsequently, the correlation of the variables is run by Pearson's method (Code5_Pearson_Correlation.R) to evaluate multicollinearity between variables (Guisan & Hofer, 2003). It is recommended to consider a bivariate correlation ± 0.70 to discard highly correlated variables (e.g., Awan et al., 2021).

Once the above codes were run, we uploaded the same subgroups (i.e., presence and background groups with 75% training and 25% testing) (Code6_Presence&backgrounds.R) for the GLM method code (Code7_GLM_model.R). Here, we first ran the GLM models per variable to obtain the p-significance value of each variable (alpha ≤ 0.05); we selected the value one (i.e., presence) as the likelihood factor. The generated models are of polynomial degree to obtain linear and quadratic response (e.g., Fielding and Bell, 1997; Allouche et al., 2006). From these results, we ran ecological response curve models, where the resulting plots included the probability of occurrence and values for continuous variables or categories for discrete variables. The points of the presence and background training group are also included.

On the other hand, a global GLM was also run, from which the generalized model is evaluated by means of a 2 x 2 contingency matrix, including both observed and predicted records. A representation of this is shown in Table 1 (adapted from Allouche et al., 2006). In this process we select an arbitrary boundary of 0.5 to obtain better modeling performance and avoid high percentage of bias in type I (omission) or II (commission) errors (e.g., Carpenter et al., 1993; Fielding and Bell, 1997; Allouche et al., 2006; Kim, 2009; Hijmans and Elith, 2017).

Table 1. Example of 2 x 2 contingency matrix for calculating performance metrics for GLM models. A represents true presence records (true positives), B represents false presence records (false positives - error of commission), C represents true background points (true negatives) and D represents false backgrounds (false negatives - errors of omission).

We then calculated the Overall and True Skill Statistics (TSS) metrics. The first is used to assess the proportion of correctly predicted cases, while the second metric assesses the prevalence of correctly predicted cases (Olden and Jackson, 2002). This metric also gives equal importance to the prevalence of presence prediction as to the random performance correction (Fielding and Bell, 1997; Allouche et al., 2006).

The last code (i.e., Code8_DOMAIN_SuitHab_model.R) is for species distribution modelling using the DOMAIN algorithm (Carpenter et al., 1993). Here, we loaded the variable stack and the presence and background group subdivided into 75% training and 25% test, each. We only included the presence training subset and the predictor variables stack in the calculation of the DOMAIN metric, as well as in the evaluation and validation of the model.

Regarding the model evaluation and estimation, we selected the following estimators:

1) partial ROC, which evaluates the approach between the curves of positive (i.e., correctly predicted presence) and negative (i.e., correctly predicted absence) cases. As farther apart these curves are, the model has a better prediction performance for the correct spatial distribution of the species (Manzanilla-Quiñones, 2020).

2) ROC/AUC curve for model validation, where an optimal performance threshold is estimated to have an expected confidence of 75% to 99% probability (De Long et al., 1988).

Abstract \r

\r The dataset was derived by the Bioregional Assessment Programme from multiple source datasets. The source datasets are identified in the Lineage field in this metadata statement. The processes undertaken to produce this derived dataset are described in the History field in this metadata statement.\r \r \r \r There are 4 csv files here:\r \r BAWAP_P_annual_BA_SYB_GLO.csv\r \r Desc: Time series mean annual BAWAP rainfall from 1900 - 2012.\r \r Source data: annual BILO rainfall on \\wron\Project\BA\BA_N_Sydney\Working\li036_Lingtao_LI\Grids\BILO_Rain_Ann\\r \r \r \r P_PET_monthly_BA_SYB_GLO.csv\r \r long term average BAWAP rainfall and Penman PET from 198101 - 201212 for each month\r \r \r \r Climatology_Trend_BA_SYB_GLO.csv\r \r Values calculated over the years 1981 - 2012 (inclusive), for 17 time periods (i.e., annual, 4 seasons and 12 months) for the following 8 meteorological variables: (i) BAWAP_P; (ii) Penman ETp; (iii) Tavg; (iv) Tmax; (v) Tmin; (vi) VPD; (vii) Rn; and (viii) Wind speed. For each of the 17 time periods for each of the 8 meteorological variables have calculated the: (a) average; (b) maximum; (c) minimum; (d) average plus standard deviation (stddev); (e) average minus stddev; (f) stddev; and (g) trend\r \r \r \r Risbey_Remote_Rainfall_Drivers_Corr_Coeffs_BA_NSB_GLO.csv\r \r Correlation coefficients (-1 to 1) between rainfall and 4 remote rainfall drivers between 1957-2006 for the four seasons. The data and methodology are described in Risbey et al. (2009). All data used in this analysis came directly from James Risbey, CMAR, Hobart. As described in the Risbey et al. (2009) paper, the rainfall was from 0.05 degree gridded data described in Jeffrey et al. (2001 - known as the SILO datasets); sea surface temperature was from the Hadley Centre Sea Ice and Sea Surface Temperature dataset (HadISST) on a 1 degree grid. BLK=Blocking; DMI=Dipole Mode Index; SAM=Southern Annular Mode; SOI=Southern Oscillation Index; DJF=December, January, February; MAM=March, April, May; JJA=June, July, August; SON=September, October, November. The analysis is a summary of Fig. 15 of Risbey et al. (2009).\r \r

Dataset History \r

\r Dataset was created from various BILO source data, including Monthly BILO rainfall, Tmax, Tmin, VPD, etc, and other source data including monthly Penman PET (calculated by Randall Donohue), Correlation coefficient data from James Risbey\r \r

Dataset Citation \r

\r Bioregional Assessment Programme (XXXX) SYD ALL climate data statistics summary. Bioregional Assessment Derived Dataset. Viewed 13 March 2019, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/b0a6ccf1-395d-430e-adf1-5068f8371dea.\r \r

Dataset Ancestors \r

\r * Derived From BILO Gridded Climate Data: Daily Climate Data for each year from 1900 to 2012\r \r

Supplementary files for the "Running a Confirmatory Factor Analysis in R: a step-by-step tutorial" consist of an R script and data needed to run the analysis.

This archive contains code and data for reproducing the analysis for “Replication Data for Revisiting ‘The Rise and Decline’ in a Population of Peer Production Projects”. Depending on what you hope to do with the data you probabbly do not want to download all of the files. Depending on your computation resources you may not be able to run all stages of the analysis. The code for all stages of the analysis, including typesetting the manuscript and running the analysis, is in code.tar. If you only want to run the final analysis or to play with datasets used in the analysis of the paper, you want intermediate_data.7z or the uncompressed tab and csv files. The data files are created in a four-stage process. The first stage uses the program “wikiq” to parse mediawiki xml dumps and create tsv files that have edit data for each wiki. The second stage generates all.edits.RDS file which combines these tsvs into a dataset of edits from all the wikis. This file is expensive to generate and at 1.5GB is pretty big. The third stage builds smaller intermediate files that contain the analytical variables from these tsv files. The fourth stage uses the intermediate files to generate smaller RDS files that contain the results. Finally, knitr and latex typeset the manuscript. A stage will only run if the outputs from the previous stages do not exist. So if the intermediate files exist they will not be regenerated. Only the final analysis will run. The exception is that stage 4, fitting models and generating plots, always runs. If you only want to replicate from the second stage onward, you want wikiq_tsvs.7z. If you want to replicate everything, you want wikia_mediawiki_xml_dumps.7z.001 wikia_mediawiki_xml_dumps.7z.002, and wikia_mediawiki_xml_dumps.7z.003. These instructions work backwards from building the manuscript using knitr, loading the datasets, running the analysis, to building the intermediate datasets. Building the manuscript using knitr This requires working latex, latexmk, and knitr installations. Depending on your operating system you might install these packages in different ways. On Debian Linux you can run apt install r-cran-knitr latexmk texlive-latex-extra. Alternatively, you can upload the necessary files to a project on Overleaf.com. Download code.tar. This has everything you need to typeset the manuscript. Unpack the tar archive. On a unix system this can be done by running tar xf code.tar. Navigate to code/paper_source. Install R dependencies. In R. run install.packages(c("data.table","scales","ggplot2","lubridate","texreg")) On a unix system you should be able to run make to build the manuscript generalizable_wiki.pdf. Otherwise you should try uploading all of the files (including the tables, figure, and knitr folders) to a new project on Overleaf.com. Loading intermediate datasets The intermediate datasets are found in the intermediate_data.7z archive. They can be extracted on a unix system using the command 7z x intermediate_data.7z. The files are 95MB uncompressed. These are RDS (R data set) files and can be loaded in R using the readRDS. For example newcomer.ds <- readRDS("newcomers.RDS"). If you wish to work with these datasets using a tool other than R, you might prefer to work with the .tab files. Running the analysis Fitting the models may not work on machines with less than 32GB of RAM. If you have trouble, you may find the functions in lib-01-sample-datasets.R useful to create stratified samples of data for fitting models. See line 89 of 02_model_newcomer_survival.R for an example. Download code.tar and intermediate_data.7z to your working folder and extract both archives. On a unix system this can be done with the command tar xf code.tar && 7z x intermediate_data.7z. Install R dependencies. install.packages(c("data.table","ggplot2","urltools","texreg","optimx","lme4","bootstrap","scales","effects","lubridate","devtools","roxygen2")). On a unix system you can simply run regen.all.sh to fit the models, build the plots and create the RDS files. Generating datasets Building the intermediate files The intermediate files are generated from all.edits.RDS. This process requires about 20GB of memory. Download all.edits.RDS, userroles_data.7z,selected.wikis.csv, and code.tar. Unpack code.tar and userroles_data.7z. On a unix system this can be done using tar xf code.tar && 7z x userroles_data.7z. Install R dependencies. In R run install.packages(c("data.table","ggplot2","urltools","texreg","optimx","lme4","bootstrap","scales","effects","lubridate","devtools","roxygen2")). Run 01_build_datasets.R. Building all.edits.RDS The intermediate RDS files used in the analysis are created from all.edits.RDS. To replicate building all.edits.RDS, you only need to run 01_build_datasets.R when the int... Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3Acfa4980c107154267d8eb6dc0753ed0fde655a73a062c0c2f5af33f237da3437 for complete metadata about this dataset.

A major objective of biometrical genetics is to explore the nature of gene action in determining quantitative traits. This also includes determination of the number of major genetic factors or genes responsible for the traits. Diallel Mating Designs have been designed to deal with the type of genetic experiments that help assess variability in observed quantitative traits arising from genetic factors, environmental factors, and their interactions. Some Diallel Mating Designs are North Carolina Designs, Line by Tester Designs and Diallel designs. AGD-R is a set of R programs that performs statistical analyses to calculate Diallel, Line by Tester, North Carolina. AGD-R contains a graphical JAVA interface that helps the user to easily choose input files, which analysis to implement, and which variables to analyze.

CTD - Bottle Summary
CTD Bottle Data - avg, stdev,min and max values at bottle firings for various parameters

Taking place at the Leeds Institute for Data Analytics on April 27th as part of the Leeds Digital Festival, the aim of the Vision Zero Innovation Lab is to explore ways to reduce the number of road casualties to zero in Leeds. If you would like to get involved or find out more, check out the event on eventbrite.Student Data Labs runs data-driven Innovation Labs for university students to learn practical data skills whilst working on civic problems. In the past, we have held Labs that tackle Type 2 Diabetes and health inequalities in Leeds. Student Data Labs works with an interdisciplinary team of students, data scientists, designers, researchers and software developers. We also aim to connect our Data Lab Volunteers with local employers who may be interested in employing them upon graduation. Visit our website, Twitter or Facebook for more info.The Vision Zero Innovation Lab is split into two sections - a Learning Lab and a Innovation Lab. The Learning Lab helps students learn real-world data skills - getting them up and running with tools like R as well as common data science problems as part of a team. The Innovation Lab is more experimental, where the aim is to develop ideas and data-driven tools to take on wicked problems.

analyze the current population survey (cps) annual social and economic supplement (asec) with r the annual march cps-asec has been supplying the statistics for the census bureau's report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage since 1948. wow. the us census bureau and the bureau of labor statistics ( bls) tag-team on this one. until the american community survey (acs) hit the scene in the early aughts (2000s), the current population survey had the largest sample size of all the annual general demographic data sets outside of the decennial census - about two hundred thousand respondents. this provides enough sample to conduct state- and a few large metro area-level analyses. your sample size will vanish if you start investigating subgroups b y state - consider pooling multiple years. county-level is a no-no. despite the american community survey's larger size, the cps-asec contains many more variables related to employment, sources of income, and insurance - and can be trended back to harry truman's presidency. aside from questions specifically asked about an annual experience (like income), many of the questions in this march data set should be t reated as point-in-time statistics. cps-asec generalizes to the united states non-institutional, non-active duty military population. the national bureau of economic research (nber) provides sas, spss, and stata importation scripts to create a rectangular file (rectangular data means only person-level records; household- and family-level information gets attached to each person). to import these files into r, the parse.SAScii function uses nber's sas code to determine how to import the fixed-width file, then RSQLite to put everything into a schnazzy database. you can try reading through the nber march 2012 sas importation code yourself, but it's a bit of a proc freak show. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2005-2012 asec - download all microdata.R down load the fixed-width file containing household, family, and person records import by separating this file into three tables, then merge 'em together at the person-level download the fixed-width file containing the person-level replicate weights merge the rectangular person-level file with the replicate weights, then store it in a sql database create a new variable - one - in the data table 2012 asec - analysis examples.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' progr am create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights perform a boatload of analysis examples replicate census estimates - 2011.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' program create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights match the sas output shown in the png file below 2011 asec replicate weight sas output.png statistic and standard error generated from the replicate-weighted example sas script contained in this census-provided person replicate weights usage instructions document. click here to view these three scripts for more detail about the current population survey - annual social and economic supplement (cps-asec), visit: the census bureau's current population survey page the bureau of labor statistics' current population survey page the current population survey's wikipedia article notes: interviews are conducted in march about experiences during the previous year. the file labeled 2012 includes information (income, work experience, health insurance) pertaining to 2011. when you use the current populat ion survey to talk about america, subract a year from the data file name. as of the 2010 file (the interview focusing on america during 2009), the cps-asec contains exciting new medical out-of-pocket spending variables most useful for supplemental (medical spending-adjusted) poverty research. confidential to sas, spss, stata, sudaan users: why are you still rubbing two sticks together after we've invented the butane lighter? time to transition to r. :D

R scripts in this fileset are those used in the PLOS ONE publication "A snapshot of translational research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH): A case study using behavioral and social science research awards and Clinical and Translational Science Awards funded publications." The article can be accessed here: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196545This consists of all R scripts used for data cleaning, data manipulation, and statistical analysis used in the publication.There are eleven files in total:1. "Step1a.bBSSR.format.grants.and.publications.data.R" combines all bBSSR 2008-2014 grant award data and associated publications downloaded from NIH Reporter. 2. "Step1b.BSSR.format.grants.and.publications.data.R" combines all BSSR-only 2008-2014 grant award data and associated publications downloaded from NIH Reporter. 3. "Step2a.bBSSR.get.pubdates.transl.and.all.grants.R" queries PubMed and downloads associated bBSSR publication data.4. "Step2b.BSSR.get.pubdates.transl.and.all.grants.R" queries PubMed and downloads associated BSSR-only publication data.5. "Step3.summary.stats.R" performs summary statistics6. "Step4.time.to.first.publication.R" performs time to first publication analysis.7. "Step5.time.to.citation.analysis.R" performs time to first citation and time to overall citation analyses.8. "Step6.combine.NIH.iCite.data.R" combines NIH iCite citation data.9. "Step7.iCite.data.analysis.R" performs citation analysis on combined iCite data.10. "Step8.MeSH.descriptors.R" queries PubMed and pulls down all MeSH descriptors for all publications11. "Step9.CTSA.publications.R" compares the percent of translational publications among bBSSR, BSSR-only, and CTSA publications.

analyze the consumer expenditure survey (ce) with r the consumer expenditure survey (ce) is the primo data source to understand how americans spend money. participating households keep a running diary about every little purchase over the year. those diaries are then summed up into precise expenditure categories. how else are you gonna know that the average american household spent $34 (±2) on bacon, $826 (±17) on cellular phones, and $13 (±2) on digital e-readers in 2011? an integral component of the market basket calculation in the consumer price index, this survey recently became available as public-use microdata and they're slowly releasing historical files back to 1996. hooray! for a t aste of what's possible with ce data, look at the quick tables listed on their main page - these tables contain approximately a bazillion different expenditure categories broken down by demographic groups. guess what? i just learned that americans living in households with $5,000 to $9,999 of annual income spent an average of $283 (±90) on pets, toys, hobbies, and playground equipment (pdf page 3). you can often get close to your statistic of interest from these web tables. but say you wanted to look at domestic pet expenditure among only households with children between 12 and 17 years old. another one of the thirteen web tables - the consumer unit composition table - shows a few different breakouts of households with kids, but none matching that exact population of interest. the bureau of labor statistics (bls) (the survey's designers) and the census bureau (the survey's administrators) have provided plenty of the major statistics and breakouts for you, but they're not psychic. if you want to comb through this data for specific expenditure categories broken out by a you-defined segment of the united states' population, then let a little r into your life. fun starts now. fair warning: only analyze t he consumer expenditure survey if you are nerd to the core. the microdata ship with two different survey types (interview and diary), each containing five or six quarterly table formats that need to be stacked, merged, and manipulated prior to a methodologically-correct analysis. the scripts in this repository contain examples to prepare 'em all, just be advised that magnificent data like this will never be no-assembly-required. the folks at bls have posted an excellent summary of what's av ailable - read it before anything else. after that, read the getting started guide. don't skim. a few of the descriptions below refer to sas programs provided by the bureau of labor statistics. you'll find these in the C:\My Directory\CES\2011\docs directory after you run the download program. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2010-2011 - download all microdata.R lo op through every year and download every file hosted on the bls's ce ftp site import each of the comma-separated value files into r with read.csv depending on user-settings, save each table as an r data file (.rda) or stat a-readable file (.dta) 2011 fmly intrvw - analysis examples.R load the r data files (.rda) necessary to create the 'fmly' table shown in the ce macros program documentation.doc file construct that 'fmly' table, using five quarters of interviews (q1 2011 thru q1 2012) initiate a replicate-weighted survey design object perform some lovely li'l analysis examples replicate the %mean_variance() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of calculating descriptive statistics using unimputed variables replicate the %compare_groups() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of performing t -tests using unimputed variables create an rsqlite database (to minimize ram usage) containing the five imputed variable files, after identifying which variables were imputed based on pdf page 3 of the user's guide to income imputation initiate a replicate-weighted, database-backed, multiply-imputed survey design object perform a few additional analyses that highlight the modified syntax required for multiply-imputed survey designs replicate the %mean_variance() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of calculating descriptive statistics using imputed variables repl icate the %compare_groups() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of performing t-tests using imputed variables replicate the %proc_reg() and %proc_logistic() macros found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of regressions and logistic regressions using both unimputed and imputed variables replicate integrated mean and se.R match each step in the bls-provided sas program "integr ated mean and se.sas" but with r instead of sas create an rsqlite database when the expenditure table gets too large for older computers to handle in ram export a table "2011 integrated mean and se.csv" that exactly matches the contents of the sas-produced "2011 integrated mean and se.lst" text file click here to view these three scripts for...

Abstract

This dataset was created within the Bioregional Assessment Programme. Data has not been derived from any source datasets. Metadata has been compiled by the Bioregional Assessment Programme.

This dataset contains a set of generic R scripts that are used in the propagation of uncertainty through numerical models.

Dataset History

The dataset contains a set of R scripts that are loaded as a library. The R scripts are used to carry out the propagation of uncertainty through numerical models. The scripts contain the functions to create the statistical emulators and do the necessary data transformations and backtransformations. The scripts are self-documenting and created by Dan Pagendam (CSIRO) and Warren Jin (CSIRO).

Dataset Citation

Bioregional Assessment Programme (2016) R-scripts for uncertainty analysis v01. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 13 March 2019, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/322c38ef-272f-4e77-964c-a14259abe9cf.

Thorium isotope data summaries from AMLR and NBP cruises to the Antarctic in 2006

Particulate organic Carbon (POC) flux was determined through measuring Thorium (234Th) reported in dpm/kg .

Cruises

AMLR (Antarctic Marine Living Resources) R/V Yuzhmorgeologiya Jan2006:
The research program was focused in the southern Drake Passage
along the Shackelton Shelf located near the Bransfield Strait.
Samples were obtained from the R/V Yuzhmorgeologiya and inflatables
that were taken to island locations.
Lat/Lon Bounding Box
-62.2538Lat, -62.9966Lon
-63.2335Lat, -59.0332Lon
-59.9964Lat, -55.7612Lon
-61.4995Lat, -53.9996Lon

NBP (Nathaniel B. Palmer) R/V Nathaniel B. Palmer July2006:
The research was conducted in the same region of the Drake Passage as the AMLR cruise.
Samples were obtained aboard the R/V Nathaniel B. Palmer
Lat/Lon bounding box
-60.4991Lat, -58.5613Lon
-62.3599Lat, -58.0392Lon
-60.2783Lat, -57.4509Lon
-61.2683Lat, -54.2852Lon

Associated Publications

Brzezinski, M.A., Nelson, D.M., Franck, V.M. and Sigmon, D.E., 2001. "Silicon dynamics within an intense open-ocean diatom bloom in the pacific sector of the southern ocean." Deep-Sea Research Part II 48, pp. 3997-4018

Michiel Rutgers van der Loeff, Manmohan M. Sarin, Mark Baskaran, Claudia Benitez-Nelson, Ken O. Buesseler, Matt Charette, Minhan Dai, Örjan Gustafsson, Pere Masque, Paul J. Morris, Kent Orlandini, Alessia Rodriguez y Baena, Nicolas Savoye, Sabine Schmidt, Robert Turnewitsch, Ingrid Vöge, James T. Waples. "A review of present techniques and methodological advances in analyzing 234Th in aquatic systems" Marine Chemistry, Volume 100, Issues 3-4, 1 August 2006, Pages 190-212

Pike, S.M., K.O. Buesseler, J. Andrews and N. Savoye, 2005. "Quantification of 234Th recovery in small volume sea water samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry." (PDF) Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 263(2): 355-360.

Willard S. Moore and Ralph Arnold (1996). "Measurement of 223Ra and 224Ra in coastal waters using a delayed coincidence counter." Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 101, no. c1, pages 1321-1329, January 15, 1996.

Time series analysis of climate data using R

This data set contains two files both of which contain R objects.

chr19_snpdata_hm3only.RDS : A data frame with snp information

evd_list_chr19_hm3.RDS : A list of eigen decomposition of the SNP correlation matrix spanning chromosome 19

These data contain only SNPs in both 1k Genomes and HapMap3. Correlation matrices were estimated using LD Shrink. These data were built for use with the causeSims R package found here: https://github.com/jean997/causeSims

BackgroundPhysical activity (PA) is important for students in secondary school, however, trends in PA among secondary school students have shown a significant decline. There is a need to understand the PA of middle school students.ObjectiveThe first objective is to identify the PA levels and screen time of students in middle school. The second objective of the study is to examine the PA levels and screen time among students of different genders.MethodsParticipants from four consecutive two-year cycles of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2011–2012, 2013–2014, 2015–2016, and 2017–2018) were included in this study. Spearman correlation model was used to identify the correlation between participants’ demographics, PA, and screen time data. Negative binomial regression model was used to describe students’ PA and screen time (Dependent variable) in different grades (Independent variables). Gender and Age were taken as control variables.ResultsAfter the data preprocessing, 2516 participants were included in this study. A significant correlation has been found between grade and PA, instead of screen time. Negative binomial regression shows that students have the lowest PA in their transition year grade 6, and their screen time decreased with the grade increased. Significant differences can be found across gender. Future efforts should focus on developing school transition support programs designed to improve PA.