The Alternative Data Vendor market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing demand for non-traditional data sources to enhance investment strategies and business decision-making. The market's expansion is fueled by the proliferation of digital data, advancements in data analytics, and a growing need for more comprehensive and nuanced insights across various sectors. The BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance) sector remains a significant driver, leveraging alternative data for credit scoring, fraud detection, and risk management. However, growth is also witnessed in industrial, IT and telecommunications, and retail and logistics sectors as businesses seek competitive advantages through data-driven decision-making. The diverse types of alternative data, including credit card transactions, web data, sentiment analysis, and public data, cater to a wide range of applications. While data privacy and regulatory concerns pose challenges, the market is overcoming these hurdles through robust data anonymization and compliance strategies. The competitive landscape features both established players like S&P Global and Bloomberg, along with emerging technology-driven companies, fostering innovation and market expansion. We project a steady compound annual growth rate (CAGR) resulting in a substantial market expansion over the next decade. This growth is expected to be distributed across regions, with North America and Europe maintaining leading positions due to early adoption and developed data infrastructure. The forecast period from 2025 to 2033 anticipates continued market expansion, propelled by factors such as increasing data availability from IoT devices, refined analytical techniques, and expanding applications across new sectors. The market's segmentation by application and data type is expected to further evolve, with niche players focusing on specific data sets and industries. This specialized approach allows for deeper insights and catering to specific client needs. Geographic expansion will continue, with growth in Asia-Pacific particularly driven by the increasing adoption of digital technologies and expanding economic activity. Strategic partnerships and mergers and acquisitions will likely shape the competitive landscape, fostering consolidation and further innovation in alternative data solutions. Despite challenges related to data quality, security, and ethical considerations, the overall outlook for the Alternative Data Vendor market remains highly positive, with substantial growth opportunities over the long term.

The San Francisco Controller's Office maintains a database of payments made to vendors from fiscal year 2007 forward. This data is presented on the Vendor Payments report hosted at http://openbook.sfgov.org, and is also available in this dataset in CSV format, which represents summary data by purchase order. We have removed sensitive information from this data – this is intended to show payments made to entities providing goods and services to the City and County and to protect individuals. For example, we have removed payments to employees (reimbursements, garnishments) and jury members, revenue refunds, payments for judgments and claims, witnesses, relocation and rehousing, and a variety of human services payments. New data is added on a weekly basis.

This statistic shows the leading vendors of big data and analytics software from 2015 to 2017. In 2017, Splunk was the largest big data and analytics software provider with 11 percent of the market.

Data Description: This data set contains all records of payments made to vendors by the City of Cincinnati from fiscal year 2014 to present. It includes information such as the department who paid for the service, the reason for payment, and vendor name.

Data Creation: This data is pulled directly from the City's financial software; which centralizes all department financial transactions city wide.

Data Created By: The Cincinnati Financial System (CFS)

Refresh Frequency: Weekly

Data Dictionary: A data dictionary providing definitions of columns and attributes is available as an attachment to this data set.

Processing: The City of Cincinnati is committed to providing the most granular and accurate data possible. In that pursuit the Office of Performance and Data Analytics facilitates standard processing to most raw data prior to publication. Processing includes but is not limited: address verification, geocoding, decoding attributes, and addition of administrative areas (i.e. Census, neighborhoods, police districts, etc.).

Data Usage: For directions on downloading and using open data please visit our How-to Guide: https://data.cincinnati-oh.gov/dataset/Open-Data-How-To-Guide/gdr9-g3ad

The Alternative Data Provider market, currently valued at $1.252 billion (2025), is experiencing robust growth, projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. Firstly, the increasing demand for more granular and timely insights across various sectors – BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance), industrial, IT and telecommunications, retail and logistics – fuels the adoption of alternative data sources beyond traditional financial data. Secondly, the sophistication of analytical techniques and AI/ML-powered solutions allows for more effective processing and interpretation of diverse data types, including credit card transactions, web data, sentiment analysis, and public records. This enables businesses to make more informed, data-driven decisions. Finally, the emergence of specialized providers catering to niche needs within these sectors has created a competitive yet innovative marketplace. While regulatory hurdles and data privacy concerns pose challenges, the overall market trajectory remains positive, indicating strong potential for future growth and investment. The market segmentation reveals a diverse landscape. Application-wise, BFSI currently holds a significant share due to the sector's reliance on real-time insights for risk management and investment strategies. However, the IT and telecommunications and Retail and Logistics sectors are exhibiting strong growth potential, driving demand for alternative data solutions to improve operational efficiency and customer understanding. Regarding data types, credit card transactions and web data are currently dominant, but sentiment and public data are gaining traction due to their ability to provide nuanced understanding of market trends and consumer behavior. Leading companies such as Preqin, Dataminr, and others are constantly innovating their offerings, focusing on the development of advanced analytics and data integration capabilities to capture a larger market share in this dynamic space. Geographical expansion, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region driven by increasing digital adoption and economic growth, presents significant opportunities for future market expansion.

Market Size statistics on the Financial Data Service Providers industry in the US

This dataset contains information of a site-specific vendor's license which is required if an individual sells or offers to sell goods or services from a stationary location. Update Frequency : Daily

The vendor payment dataset contains payments made by state agencies and institutions of higher education that are processed through the Office of Management and Enterprise Services. These payments reflect disbursements from a state fund for the purchase of goods received, services performed, reimbursements, and payments to other governments. Travel reimbursements include the zip code of the State Capitol and not the individual’s address. For security and privacy reasons, payments related to “confidential matters” are included in the dataset; however, the payee name is replaced with “Protected Information” and the address is changed to the State Capitol address. Also, some state agencies are authorized to make payments outside of the Office of Management and Enterprise Services from certain authorized funds. In these cases, the agency reports only the total amount of the expenditures to the Office of Management and Enterprise Services but does not report the detailed vendor payment information. Therefore, these payment details are not included in the dataset.

The vendor payment dataset contains payments made by state agencies and institutions of higher education that are processed through the Office of Management and Enterprise Services. These payments reflect disbursements from a state fund for the purchase of goods received, services performed, reimbursements, and payments to other governments. Travel reimbursements include the ZIP Code of the State Capitol and not the individual’s address. For security and privacy reasons, payments related to “confidential matters” are included in the dataset; however, the payee name is replaced with “Protected Information” and the address is changed to the State Capitol address. Also, some state agencies are authorized to make payments outside of the Office of Management and Enterprise Services from certain authorized funds. In these cases, the agency reports only the total amount of the expenditures to the Office of Management and Enterprise Services but does not report the detailed vendor payment information. Therefore, these payment details are not included in the dataset.

Purchasing represents the procurement from vendors of goods and services that are recorded in the State’s purchasing system and for which payment must be made amounts already spent, amounts the State is obligated to pay to a specific vendor as a result of an order or contract, and amounts that are set aside for imminent purchases are included in purchasing data. The summary purchasing data may fluctuate until all underlying transactions in the reporting period have been finalized by the buying agency. The purchasing system records purchases for all three branches of State government: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Authority purchasing data is not available at this time. Additional information is in the attached dataset summary PDF (available on the [About] tab under "Attachments".)

Most U.S. consumers are open to sharing information with insurance providers, although a 2019 survey finds that this willingness quickly decreases the more personal the information becomes. According to the survey, around ********** of consumers would be willing to share driving and claims history. However, just ** percent of respondents are willing to share social media information, and only ** percent are comfortable sharing mobile phone data.

This dataset provides the public with the value of individual payments made to vendors for Professional Services or Construction contacts, by State Contract number. Data includes individual payments recorded in the specified time frame to vendors for the County in which the work was performed. Statewide payments are also included that are not County specific.

Hungary Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: Vestel data was reported at 0.000 % in 28 Sep 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 % for 27 Sep 2023. Hungary Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: Vestel data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 % from Sep 2023 (Median) to 28 Sep 2023, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.040 % in 24 Sep 2023 and a record low of 0.000 % in 28 Sep 2023. Hungary Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: Vestel data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statcounter Global Stats. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hungary – Table HU.SC.IU: Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share.

The Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary (PSPS) data provides a summary of calendar year Medicare Part B carrier and durable medical equipment fee-for-service (FFS) claims. The file is organized by carrier, pricing locality, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code, HCPCS modifier, provider specialty, type of service, and place of service. The summarized fields are total submitted services and charges, total allowed services and charges, total denied services and charges, and total payment amounts. This dataset is produced annually and is typically available in July (i.e., data for CY2015 is usually available in July 2016). Note: This full dataset contains more records than most spreadsheet programs can handle, which will result in an incomplete load of data. Use of a database or statistical software is required.

Market Analysis The global Vendor Risk Management (VRM) industry is projected to reach a market size of $11.98 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 12.50%. This growth is attributed to the rising adoption of third-party vendors and the increasing complexity of supply chains. Additionally, regulatory compliance mandates and the need to mitigate vendor-related risks are driving demand for VRM solutions. The market is segmented based on type (solutions, services), deployment type (on-premises, cloud), organization size (SMEs, large enterprises), and industry vertical (BFSI, manufacturing, government, healthcare). Key industry trends include the adoption of AI and machine learning to automate VRM processes, the growing popularity of cloud-based solutions, and the emergence of managed VRM services. However, concerns about data privacy and security, as well as the lack of skilled professionals, pose challenges to the industry. Major players in the VRM market include Quantivate, IBM, LockPath, Rapid Ratings International, SAI Global, and MetricStream. North America currently dominates the market, but Asia Pacific is expected to witness significant growth in the coming years. Recent developments include: September 2023 - Certa, a third-party management platform, has raised USD 35 million to invest in artificial intelligence that takes text-based policies around everything from ESG and legal to compliance and procurement and converts them into controlled workflows that integrate with third-party tools. Using artificial intelligence will allow customers to reduce the size of their vendor management team and onboard third-party providers more quickly., May 2023 - Vanta, a SaaS-based security and compliance solution provider, launched a Vendor Risk Management (VRM) offering focused on helping customers streamline third-party security with automated workflows for vendor security reviews and compliance. It is designed to combine the entire vendor management process within a single, automated workflow with necessary integrations with third-party applications, identity providers, and database systems.. Key drivers for this market are: Need for the Efficient Management of Complex Vendor Ecosystems, View the Risk Levels Associated With Various Tasks. Potential restraints include: Dependence on Non-Formal and Manual Processes By Many Organizations. Notable trends are: BFSI is Expected to Witness Significant Growth.

View LSEG's ICE Data Pricing and Reference Data, and find real-time market data, time-sensitive pricing, and reference data for securities trading.

Amazon S3 led the global enterprise data storage software industry in 2024 with a market share of ***** percent, followed by Pure and NetApp, which accounted for ***** and **** percent shares, respectively. Amazon S3, also known as Amazon Simple Storage Service, was launched in 2006 by Amazon Web Services (AWS).

Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: TCL data was reported at 0.000 % in 16 Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.010 % for 15 Mar 2025. Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: TCL data is updated daily, averaging 0.010 % from Mar 2025 (Median) to 16 Mar 2025, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.030 % in 14 Mar 2025 and a record low of 0.000 % in 16 Mar 2025. Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share: Tablet: TCL data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Statcounter Global Stats. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Australia – Table AU.SC.IU: Internet Usage: Device Vendor Market Share.

The vendor payment dataset contains payments made by state agencies and institutions of higher education that are processed through the Office of Management and Enterprise Services. These payments reflect disbursements from a state fund for the purchase of goods received, services performed, reimbursements, and payments to other governments. Travel reimbursements include the zip code of the State Capitol and not the individual’s address. For security and privacy reasons, payments related to “confidential matters” are included in the dataset; however, the payee name is replaced with “Protected Information” and the address is changed to the State Capitol address. Also, some state agencies are authorized to make payments outside of the Office of Management and Enterprise Services from certain authorized funds. In these cases, the agency reports only the total amount of the expenditures to the Office of Management and Enterprise Services but does not report the detailed vendor payment information. Therefore, these payment details are not included in the dataset.

Comprehensive dataset of 4,669 Seed suppliers in United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.