Compiled count of database access for all branches, by month, by fiscal year. Numbers represent “any action performed by the user in relation to a content item," i.e., number of times databases were used to access materials such as articles, videos, PDFs, abstracts etc. Updated annually.
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37085/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37085/terms
The Performing Arts Databases page contains database and catalog resources in the performing arts areas of research. The databases are stand-alone resources that are not integrated with the rest of the Library's digital collections or catalogs. These databases are managed by the Library of Congress's Music Division; the Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division; and the American Folklife Center. Databases available via the Performing Arts Databases include the following resources: Chasanoff/Elozua "Amazing Grace" Collection It's Showtime! Sheet Music from Stage and Screen Jazz on the Screen Filmography Show Music on Record Silent Feature Film Tap Dance in America Traditional Music & Spoken Word U.S. ISMN Public Archive
https://www.ibisworld.com/about/termsofuse/https://www.ibisworld.com/about/termsofuse/
Libraries have a long and storied history, dating back thousands of years to the legendary Library of Alexandria. Even in today's digital age, they act as vital public institutions that provide free access to costly information and resources, contributing significantly to community development and literacy. Since library benefits are distributed as externalities across the community, funding for libraries primarily comes from local government sources, such as property taxes. However, budgets are often under pressure due to shifting priorities. Libraries have sought alternative funding sources like grants, donations and partnerships with private entities. Despite diverse funding, libraries struggle with underutilization and competition from substitutes. Over the past five years, industry revenue growth has wavered, dipping at a CAGR of 2.1% to a total of $2.5 billion in 2024, with inflation burning any excess profit down to 3.4% and revenue falling 3.0% in the most recent twelve months. Libraries serve a diverse market, including students, researchers, entrepreneurs and the general public, disproportionately benefitting financially challenged communities. They offer services beyond book lending, like access to digital resources, educational programs and community events. The emergence and surge in popularity of digital technology have also expanded the library's role. It now provides access to e-books, online databases and physical technology like desktops and mobile hotspots. Cultural shifts toward rapid digital information consumption pose challenges and opportunities for libraries. Intellectual property laws affect how libraries can provide access to copyrighted materials. In response to this challenge, libraries have advocated for fair use policies and open access initiatives, particularly after COVID shut down access to physical book lending. Libraries are also adapting by investing in digital infrastructure and enhancing their online presence, often partnering with private companies to build online platforms and taking pages from entertainment competitors like Netflix and Audible. Some libraries are evolving into community hubs or maker (3d printing) spaces. Still, the high cost of these transitions is challenging, and revenue is poised to continue its downward trend, sliding at a CAGR of 2.1% to $2.2 billion through the end of 2029.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The Chinese ebook database market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach a market size of $329.3 million in 2025, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.2% from 2019 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The increasing digital literacy and smartphone penetration within China, coupled with a rising demand for convenient and accessible learning resources across educational institutions (Universities, Research Institutes, Public Libraries) and various professional sectors (Arts, Business, Engineering, Medicine, Sciences), are primary drivers. Government initiatives promoting digitalization and online learning further bolster market growth. The segment encompassing educational institutions is a significant contributor, reflecting the growing adoption of digital learning materials. While specific market share data for individual segments and regions is not explicitly provided, logical inferences can be made regarding strong growth within China, considering the domestic focus of companies like CEPIEC and Beijing Zhongke. International players may hold a smaller market share in comparison, though North America and Europe are likely to experience moderate growth due to increasing demand for Chinese language resources and scholarly publications. Competitive factors among leading database providers, including China National Sci-Tech Information and China International Book Trading Corporation, create a dynamic market landscape. Future market growth may be tempered by factors such as data security concerns and the ongoing evolution of digital learning technologies. The forecast period (2025-2033) anticipates sustained growth driven by continuing improvements in internet infrastructure, expanding digital content availability, and increasing investments in research and development within educational and professional sectors. The expansion of ebook databases is further facilitated by the ongoing integration of advanced features like AI-powered search functionalities and personalized learning experiences, improving user engagement and broadening market appeal. However, challenges including maintaining data accuracy, copyright issues, and the potential for market saturation in certain niche segments warrant monitoring. The market's trajectory indicates a promising outlook for companies involved in providing and enhancing Chinese ebook databases, with potential for further expansion through strategic partnerships and technological innovation.
A complete listing of subscription databases provided by the Stephen B. Thacker CDC Library.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Endnote xml file of complete search results - not de-duplicated.
Search query (cannabis based medicines, endocannabinoid system modulators and cannabinoids tested in animal models of pathological or injury-related persistent pain) conducted on 9 April 2019.
Searched databases: Web of Science, Embase and PubMed
The citations retrieved from the searches of each database have been merged together, there is a total of 15216 citations.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Natural products and semi-synthetic compounds continue to be a significant source of drug candidates for a broad range of diseases, including the current pandemic caused by COVID-19. Besides being attractive sources of bioactive compounds for further development or optimization, natural products are excellent candidates of unique substructures for fragment-based drug discovery inspired on natural products. To this end, fragment libraries are required that can be incorporated into automated drug design pipelines. However, it is still scarce to have public fragment libraries based on extensive collections of natural products. Herein we report the generation and analysis of a fragment library of natural products derived from a database with more than 400,000 compounds. We also report fragment libraries of food chemical databases and other compound data sets of interest in drug discovery, including compound libraries relevant for COVID-19 drug discovery. The fragment libraries were characterized in terms of contents and diversity.Sopporting information contains: COCONUT_COMPOUNDS.csv, FooDB_COMPOUNDS.csv, DCM_COMPOUNDS.csv, CAS_COMPOUNDS.csv, 3CLP_COMPOUNDS.csv. All datasets contain the curated structures and the following information: identicator number (ID), simplified molecular input line entry system (Smiles), Average Molecular Weight (AMW), number of carbons, oxygens, nitrogens, heavy atoms, aliphatic rings, aromatic rings, heterocycles, bridgehead atoms, fraction of sp3 carbon atoms and chiral carbons, and a list of fragments generated from each compound. FRAGMENTS_COCONUT.csv, FRAGMENTS_FooDB.csv, FRAGMENTS_DCM.csv, FRAGMENTS_CAS.csv, FRAGMENTS_3CLP.csv. All libraries contain structures generated (Fragments) from each compound library (Dataset) and the following information: number of compounds that contain that fragment in a dataset (Count) and fraction of them (Proportion), average Molecular Weight (AMW), number of carbons, oxygens, nitrogens, heavy atoms, aliphatic rings, aromatic rings, heterocycles, bridgehead atoms, fraction of sp3 carbon atoms and chiral carbons.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
รายละเอียดข้อมูลบทความที่เผยแพร่ในวารสารวิจัย สมาคมห้องสมุดแห่งประเทศไทยฯ ตั้งแต่ พ.ศ. 2551-2562TLA Research Journal, Journal of the Thai Library Association
This dataset tracks the updates made on the dataset "CDC Library Subscription Databases" as a repository for previous versions of the data and metadata.
LinkOut is a service that allows you to link directly from PubMed and other NCBI databases to a wide range of information and services beyond the NCBI systems. LinkOut aims to facilitate access to relevant online resources in order to extend, clarify, and supplement information found in NCBI databases. Third parties can link directly from PubMed and other Entrez database records to relevant Web-accessible resources beyond the Entrez system. Includes full-text publications, biological databases, consumer health information and research tools.
https://data.gov.tw/licensehttps://data.gov.tw/license
Library name, service population, book collection, non-book materials, online databases, CD databases, other types of databases, annual count of borrowed books and periodicals, annual count of borrowed volumes, annual count of visitors, annual count of other visitors, total number of library card applications, annual total of library card applications.
https://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The Chinese ebook database market presents a significant opportunity, exhibiting robust growth. While the exact CAGR isn't provided, considering the global growth in digital content and the substantial Chinese market, a conservative estimate of the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for the period 2025-2033 would be around 15%. This projection factors in increased internet penetration, rising smartphone usage, government initiatives promoting digital literacy, and the increasing demand for accessible educational and research resources. With a 2025 market size of $502.3 million, this CAGR suggests a substantial market expansion by 2033. Key drivers include the rising popularity of e-readers and tablets, the increasing adoption of online learning platforms, and the growing need for efficient information retrieval in academic and research settings. The market is segmented by application (university, research institute, public library) and type (arts, business, engineering, medicine, sciences), reflecting the diverse needs of various user groups. Leading companies like CEPIEC, Beijing Zhongke, and China National Sci-Tech Information are capitalizing on these trends, though competition is intensifying as new players enter the market. Growth will likely be influenced by factors such as government regulations regarding digital content, technological advancements, and the ongoing evolution of user preferences. The segmentation of the Chinese ebook database market allows for a nuanced understanding of market dynamics. The academic and research segments are expected to drive substantial growth, fueled by the expanding higher education sector and the increasing reliance on digital resources for research. The public library segment also presents a promising avenue for growth, with ongoing digitization efforts and increasing accessibility initiatives. The diverse subject categories within the "type" segmentation (arts, business, engineering, etc.) highlight the breadth of content available and the specific demands of various user groups. Market restraints might include concerns about copyright infringement, the need for improved digital infrastructure in certain regions, and potential challenges in managing the vast amount of digital content effectively. However, the overall market outlook remains positive, driven by the fundamental shift towards digital information consumption in China and the inherent advantages of ebook databases over traditional print materials.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The German Library Statistics (DBS) is the national statistics of the German library system and contains statistical key figures. It includes public libraries, scientific libraries, as well as specialized scientific libraries. More information can be found at DBS. This dataset contains the following information about scientific libraries in Bavaria in 2005: ... of which: Estate series - departure, ... of which: Estate Series - Expenditures, ... of which: Estate Series - Access, ... including: Estate series - inventory, ... of which: Databases, on data carriers - inventory, ... of which: Databases, on data carriers - outgoing, ... of which: Databases, on data carriers - editions, ... of which: Databases, on data carriers - access, ... of which: Databases, as network version - inventory, ... of which: Databases, as network version - exit, ... of which: Databases, as network version - editions, ... of which: Databases, as network version - access, ... of which: Individual digital documents - inventory, ... of which: single digital documents - departure, ... of which: Individual digital documents - issues, ... ... of which: on data carriers - stock, ... ... of which: on data carriers - exit, ... ... of which: on data carriers - expenditure, ... ... of which: on data carriers - access, ... ... of which: as network version - stock, ... ... of which: as net version - exit, ... ... of which: as a network version - editions, ... ... of which: as network version - access, ... of which: Digital Single Documents - Access
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Hyperspectral libraries for unvarnished oil paints on canvas. The oil colours and mixtures selected as swatches were based on materials that Edvard Munch (1863-1944) is suspected to have used on his Aula paintings (1909-1916) situated at the University of Oslo's festive hall in Norway's capital.
A total of seven files are included, which may be classified as:
The first set of reference canvases (Library (1)) was made in 2009 at the Conservation Studies department (UiO). Pigments in powder form were ground in linseed oil and applied by brush, with increasing amounts of white spirits. This library served as a reference for unvarnished, handmade oil paints in linseed oil, and was scanned after 11 years of natural ageing. Captured in four swathes in the VNIR range (400-1000 nm) - each canvas is comprised of two swathes (001 and 002; 003 and 004).
Files:
(*) sub-structure for "002-004" mirrors that for "001"
The second set of reference canvases (Library (2)) was made in 2021 using prefabricated tube paints containing pigments in linseed oil, as produced in the Classic Oil Colour series by Old Holland (Netherlands). The paint applications by brush were made both neat and diluted in white spirits (0–10% w/v), and selected swatches per colour/mixture were varnished (both single and double applications) with gum dammar and Laropal A81 (10% w/v in Shellsol A and B, with Tinuvin 251 UV stabiliser). Captured in six swathes in the VNIR range (400-1000 nm) and six swathes in the SWIR range (1000-2500 nm) - each canvas is comprised of three swathes (001-003; 004-006).
Files:
(*) sub-structure for "002-006" mirrors that for "001"
Library shares with other academic libraries commitment to intellectual freedom and access to information. This commitment is reflected in open stacks, active interlibrary loan service, online catalog, and Web site linked efficiently to other sites and databases. Has partnerships with libraries at other University of California campuses, local California State Universities, community colleges, and public libraries. Has active participation in California Digital Library.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Monthly usage figures for online resources including databases and e-book platforms when available, for January 2005 to present.
Blank means no data available
Resources included : description {minimum dates of subscription} What the figure is
19th Century British Library Newspapers : digital newspaper archive {May 2007 - present} Number of sessions
Access to Research : online journals {April 2014 - present} Number of pages viewed
Ancestry : family history {October 2008 - present} Number of sessions until May 2015; number of content pages viewed from June 2015
Britannica Online : encyclopedia {January 2005? - present} Number of searches conducted, until June 2014; number of sessions from July 2014
British Standards {March 2005 - April 2017; November 2017 - present} Number of content pages viewed
British Way of Life : information to help asylum seekers, refugees and migrants in getting settled in the UK {October 2016 - present} Number of sessions
Citizens Advice Notes : UK law made understandable {March 2007 - March 2016} Number of pages viewed
COBRA : business information fact sheets and business sector profiles {October 2005 - present} Number of pages viewed
Corporate researcher / Market IQ : company information database {January 2008 - 2015} Number of "reports viewed"
EISODOS : information for foreigners coming to live in the UK {October 2008 - October 2013} Information on meaning of figure lost
Enquire : "ask a librarian" online chat service {2005 - March 2016} Number of chats started by users in the Newcastle area
Find my past : family history {April 2011 - present} Number of sessions (or so we seem to remember when we had access to usage figures)
IBISWorld : market research {January 2017 - present} Number of pages viewed
Key Note : company information and market research {April 2011 - October 2018} Number of reports viewed
Kompass : business information {2006 - July 2011} Information on meaning of figure lost
Know UK : current reference information {January 2007 - June 2011} Information on meaning of figure lost
Life in Great Britain : self-learn course to prepare for the Life in the UK citizenship test {January 2010 - present} Number of sessions
Local Data Online : business (retail sector) information {November 2013 - July 2015?} Information on meaning of figure lost
Mint UK & Mint Global : company information databases {March 2014 - 2015} Information on meaning of figure lost
Mintel : market reports {2006? - April 2010; June 2013 - present} Number of reports viewed
Newsstand : online newspapers {January 2011 - March 2014} Information on meaning of figure lost
Onesource / Avention : company information database (changed name over the years) {March 2012 - October 2013; July 2015 - present} Number of searches conducted
News UK : newspaper articles {January 2007 - October 2010?} Information on meaning of figure lost Oxford English Dictionary {May 2006 - present} Number of sessions
Oxford Art Online {March 2006 - present} Number of sessions
Oxford Dictionaries {February 2015 - present} Number of sessions
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography {January 2006 - present} Number of sessions
Oxford Music Online {March 2006 - present} Number of sessions
Oxford Reference Online {March 2006 - present} Number of sessions
Safari Select : online books (to read online, as opposed to the e-books you can download and read offline) {May 2009 - March 2014} Number of books viewed
Times Digital Archive : digitised newspapers {January 2005 - present} Number of sessions
Theory Test Pro : practice questions for the driving theory test {August 2010 - present} Number of sessions
Transparent language online / Byki : language courses {January 2011 - November 2012} Number of courses accessed
Universal Skills : learn basic computer skills and how to use Universal Job Match {November 2014 - present} Number of users
Newcastle Library App (devices) : number of devices the app is on {2013 - present}
Newcastle Library App (launches) : number of times the app has been used {2013 - present}
Bibliotheca Cloud Library : e-books and e-audiobooks {February 2016 - March 2018} Number of items borrowed
Bolinda : e-audiobooks collection {2012 - February 2016} Number of items borrowed (figures only from April 2015)
Bolinda BorrowBox e-books {February 2018 - present} Number of items borrowed
Bolinda BorrowBox e-audiobooks {February 2018 - present} Number of items borrowed
ComicsPlus : e-comic books {March 2017 - present} Number of items borrowed
OneClick / RB Digital (e-audiobooks) : e-audiobooks collection (became RB Digital in... 2017?) {May 2015 - present} Number of items borrowed
Overdrive (e-audiobooks) {2011 - May 2016} Number of items borrowed (figures only from April 2015)
Overdrive (e-books) {2011 - May 2016} Number of items borrowed (figures only from April 2015)
Public Library Online : e-books collection {April 2016 - February 2018} Number of items borrowed
Zinio / RB Digital (magazines) : digital magazines (the Zinio service became integrated with the other RB Digital content in 2017) {May 2015 - present} Number of magazines downloaded (figures only from January 2016)
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The German Library Statistics (DBS) is the national statistics of the German library system and contains statistical key figures. It includes public libraries, scientific libraries, as well as specialized scientific libraries. More information can be found at DBS. This dataset contains the following information on public libraries in Bavaria in 2023: Media as a whole - physical inventory, media as a whole - borrowings, 1. Physical media as a whole - borrowings, media in free-hand compilation all in all. - Inventory, media in free-hand position or in 'direct access' in total. - Borrowings, stock of magazines - Print media and non-print media in physical units, total print media - Stock, total print media - Borrowings, ... including: Children's and Youth Literature - Collection, ... including: Children's and Youth Literature - Borrowings, Non-Prints and Miscellaneous - Stock, Non-Prints and Miscellaneous - Borrowings, E-Media in own stock, 1. E-media in association, E-media - borrowings, access to media units, 1. ... of which: Number of media donated, Licensed virtual platforms, services and databases, Current newspaper and magazine subscriptions in print, Current newspaper and magazine subscriptions in electronic form, 1. Do you use exchange, block stocks?, orders in taking (passive) loan traffic, orders in giving (active) loan traffic
United States agricultural researchers have many options for making their data available online. This dataset aggregates the primary sources of ag-related data and determines where researchers are likely to deposit their agricultural data. These data serve as both a current landscape analysis and also as a baseline for future studies of ag research data. Purpose As sources of agricultural data become more numerous and disparate, and collaboration and open data become more expected if not required, this research provides a landscape inventory of online sources of open agricultural data. An inventory of current agricultural data sharing options will help assess how the Ag Data Commons, a platform for USDA-funded data cataloging and publication, can best support data-intensive and multi-disciplinary research. It will also help agricultural librarians assist their researchers in data management and publication. The goals of this study were to establish where agricultural researchers in the United States-- land grant and USDA researchers, primarily ARS, NRCS, USFS and other agencies -- currently publish their data, including general research data repositories, domain-specific databases, and the top journals compare how much data is in institutional vs. domain-specific vs. federal platforms determine which repositories are recommended by top journals that require or recommend the publication of supporting data ascertain where researchers not affiliated with funding or initiatives possessing a designated open data repository can publish data Approach The National Agricultural Library team focused on Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and United States Forest Service (USFS) style research data, rather than ag economics, statistics, and social sciences data. To find domain-specific, general, institutional, and federal agency repositories and databases that are open to US research submissions and have some amount of ag data, resources including re3data, libguides, and ARS lists were analysed. Primarily environmental or public health databases were not included, but places where ag grantees would publish data were considered. Search methods We first compiled a list of known domain specific USDA / ARS datasets / databases that are represented in the Ag Data Commons, including ARS Image Gallery, ARS Nutrition Databases (sub-components), SoyBase, PeanutBase, National Fungus Collection, i5K Workspace @ NAL, and GRIN. We then searched using search engines such as Bing and Google for non-USDA / federal ag databases, using Boolean variations of “agricultural data” /“ag data” / “scientific data” + NOT + USDA (to filter out the federal / USDA results). Most of these results were domain specific, though some contained a mix of data subjects. We then used search engines such as Bing and Google to find top agricultural university repositories using variations of “agriculture”, “ag data” and “university” to find schools with agriculture programs. Using that list of universities, we searched each university web site to see if their institution had a repository for their unique, independent research data if not apparent in the initial web browser search. We found both ag specific university repositories and general university repositories that housed a portion of agricultural data. Ag specific university repositories are included in the list of domain-specific repositories. Results included Columbia University – International Research Institute for Climate and Society, UC Davis – Cover Crops Database, etc. If a general university repository existed, we determined whether that repository could filter to include only data results after our chosen ag search terms were applied. General university databases that contain ag data included Colorado State University Digital Collections, University of Michigan ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), and University of Minnesota DRUM (Digital Repository of the University of Minnesota). We then split out NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) repositories. Next we searched the internet for open general data repositories using a variety of search engines, and repositories containing a mix of data, journals, books, and other types of records were tested to determine whether that repository could filter for data results after search terms were applied. General subject data repositories include Figshare, Open Science Framework, PANGEA, Protein Data Bank, and Zenodo. Finally, we compared scholarly journal suggestions for data repositories against our list to fill in any missing repositories that might contain agricultural data. Extensive lists of journals were compiled, in which USDA published in 2012 and 2016, combining search results in ARIS, Scopus, and the Forest Service's TreeSearch, plus the USDA web sites Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Rural Development (RD), and Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The top 50 journals' author instructions were consulted to see if they (a) ask or require submitters to provide supplemental data, or (b) require submitters to submit data to open repositories. Data are provided for Journals based on a 2012 and 2016 study of where USDA employees publish their research studies, ranked by number of articles, including 2015/2016 Impact Factor, Author guidelines, Supplemental Data?, Supplemental Data reviewed?, Open Data (Supplemental or in Repository) Required? and Recommended data repositories, as provided in the online author guidelines for each the top 50 journals. Evaluation We ran a series of searches on all resulting general subject databases with the designated search terms. From the results, we noted the total number of datasets in the repository, type of resource searched (datasets, data, images, components, etc.), percentage of the total database that each term comprised, any dataset with a search term that comprised at least 1% and 5% of the total collection, and any search term that returned greater than 100 and greater than 500 results. We compared domain-specific databases and repositories based on parent organization, type of institution, and whether data submissions were dependent on conditions such as funding or affiliation of some kind. Results A summary of the major findings from our data review: Over half of the top 50 ag-related journals from our profile require or encourage open data for their published authors. There are few general repositories that are both large AND contain a significant portion of ag data in their collection. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), ICPSR, and ORNL DAAC were among those that had over 500 datasets returned with at least one ag search term and had that result comprise at least 5% of the total collection. Not even one quarter of the domain-specific repositories and datasets reviewed allow open submission by any researcher regardless of funding or affiliation. See included README file for descriptions of each individual data file in this dataset. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Journals. File Name: Journals.csvResource Title: Journals - Recommended repositories. File Name: Repos_from_journals.csvResource Title: TDWG presentation. File Name: TDWG_Presentation.pptxResource Title: Domain Specific ag data sources. File Name: domain_specific_ag_databases.csvResource Title: Data Dictionary for Ag Data Repository Inventory. File Name: Ag_Data_Repo_DD.csvResource Title: General repositories containing ag data. File Name: general_repos_1.csvResource Title: README and file inventory. File Name: README_InventoryPublicDBandREepAgData.txt
The State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) are part of the family of databases and software tools developed for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). SEDD captures discharge information on all emergency department visits that do not result in an admission.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The top 10 journals having FOC-related publications (N = 743).
Compiled count of database access for all branches, by month, by fiscal year. Numbers represent “any action performed by the user in relation to a content item," i.e., number of times databases were used to access materials such as articles, videos, PDFs, abstracts etc. Updated annually.