The dataset contains risk-adjusted mortality rates, quality ratings, and number of deaths and cases for 6 medical conditions treated (Acute Stroke, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Hip Fracture and Pneumonia) and 3 procedures performed (Carotid Endarterectomy, Pancreatic Resection, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) in California hospitals. The 2023 IMIs were generated using AHRQ Version 2024, while previous years' IMIs were generated with older versions of AHRQ software (2022 IMIs by Version 2023, 2021 IMIs by Version 2022, 2020 IMIs by Version 2021, 2019 IMIs by Version 2020, 2016-2018 IMIs by Version 2019, 2014 and 2015 IMIs by Version 5.0, and 2012 and 2013 IMIs by Version 4.5). The differences in the statistical method employed and inclusion and exclusion criteria using different versions can lead to different results. Users should not compare trends of mortality rates over time. However, many hospitals showed consistent performance over years; “better” performing hospitals may perform better and “worse” performing hospitals may perform worse consistently across years. This dataset does not include conditions treated or procedures performed in outpatient settings. Please refer to statewide table for California overall rates: https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/california-hospital-inpatient-mortality-rates-and-quality-ratings/resource/af88090e-b6f5-4f65-a7ea-d613e6569d96
https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
This publication of the SHMI relates to discharges in the reporting period February 2024 - January 2025. The SHMI is the ratio between the actual number of patients who die following hospitalisation at the trust and the number that would be expected to die on the basis of average England figures, given the characteristics of the patients treated there. The SHMI covers patients admitted to hospitals in England who died either while in hospital or within 30 days of being discharged. To help users of the data understand the SHMI, trusts have been categorised into bandings indicating whether a trust's SHMI is 'higher than expected', 'as expected' or 'lower than expected'. For any given number of expected deaths, a range of observed deaths is considered to be 'as expected'. If the observed number of deaths falls outside of this range, the trust in question is considered to have a higher or lower SHMI than expected. The expected number of deaths is a statistical construct and is not a count of patients. The difference between the number of observed deaths and the number of expected deaths cannot be interpreted as the number of avoidable deaths or excess deaths for the trust. The SHMI is not a measure of quality of care. A higher than expected number of deaths should not immediately be interpreted as indicating poor performance and instead should be viewed as a 'smoke alarm' which requires further investigation. Similarly, an 'as expected' or 'lower than expected' SHMI should not immediately be interpreted as indicating satisfactory or good performance. Trusts may be located at multiple sites and may be responsible for 1 or more hospitals. A breakdown of the data by site of treatment is also provided, as well as a breakdown of the data by diagnosis group. Further background information and supporting documents, including information on how to interpret the SHMI, are available on the SHMI homepage (see Related Links).
This statistic shows the improvement in mortality rates 2007-2009 amongst all hospitals in the United States, sorted by mortality rates for inhospital care as well as 30 and 180 days following hospitalization. In addition to presenting information on improvement in the United States overall, this graph includes further data on hospitals of differing quality ratings. In the United States overall, mortality rates improved by 8.2 percent, but in five-star hospitals, mortality rates improved by 9.81 percent.
Number and percentage of deaths, by place of death (in hospital or non-hospital), 1991 to most recent year.
This statistic depicts the 30-day mortality rate for patients with select conditions in U.S. hospitals who were discharged, between 2010 and 2016. Among heart attack, stroke, heart failure and pneumonia patients, the 30-day mortality rate for discharged patients averaged 14.1 percent between 2013 and 2016.
These mortality indicators provide information to help the National Health Service (NHS) monitor success in preventing potentially avoidable deaths following hospital treatment.
The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) have, over many years, consistently shown that some deaths are associated with shortcomings in health care. The NHS may be helped to prevent such potentially avoidable deaths by seeing comparative figures and learning lessons from the confidential enquiries, and from the experience of hospitals with low death rates.
The indicators presented measure mortality rates for patients, admitted for certain conditions or procedures, where death occurred either in hospital or within 30 days post discharge.
There are five ‘deaths within 30 days’ indicators:
Operative procedures:
Emergency admissions :
Data are presented for the 10-year period 2005/06 to 2014/15 , and in separate breakdowns for females, males and persons. The indicators are presented at the local government geographies and by individual institution.
These indicators were previously published in the Compendium of Clinical and Health Indicators and are now published on the Health and Social Care Information Centre’s (HSCIC) Indicator Portal as part of the continuing release of this indicator set.
Data, along with indicator specifications providing details of indicator construction, statistical methods and interpretation considerations, can be accessed by visiting the HSCIC’s Indicator Portal and using the menu to navigate to Compendium of population health indicators > Hospital care > Outcomes > Deaths.
https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
Notes:
U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains the number of cases, number of in hospital/30 day deaths, observed, expected and risk- adjusted mortality rates for cardiac surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) by hospital. Regions represent where the hospitals are located. The initial Health Data NY dataset includes patients discharged between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010. Analyses of risk-adjusted mortality rates and associated risk factors are provided for 2010 and for the three-year period from 2008 through 2010. For PCI, analyses of all cases, non-emergency cases (which represent the majority of procedures) and emergency cases are included. Subsequent year reports data will be appended to this dataset. For more information check out: http://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/consumer_information/cardiac_surgery/ or go to the “About” tab.
The dataset contains risk-adjusted mortality rates, and number of deaths and cases for 6 medical conditions treated (Acute Stroke, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Hip Fracture and Pneumonia) and 6 procedures performed (Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair, Carotid Endarterectomy, Craniotomy, Esophageal Resection, Pancreatic Resection, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) in California hospitals. The 2014 and 2015 IMIs were generated using AHRQ Version 5.0, while the 2012 and 2013 IMIs were generated using AHRQ Version 4.5. The differences in the statistical method employed and inclusion and exclusion criteria using different versions can lead to different results. Users should not compare trends of mortality rates over time. However, many hospitals showed consistent performance over years; “better” performing hospitals may perform better and “worse” performing hospitals may perform worse consistently across years. This dataset does not include conditions treated or procedures performed in outpatient settings. Please refer to hospital table for hospital rates: https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/california-hospital-inpatient-mortality-rates-and-quality-ratings
This dataset contains Mortality Statistics for years 2015 and 2016 from Quality Based Reimbursement (QBR) Program for hospitals in Maryland. It includes Hospital ID, Hospital Name, Mortality Rate, Ratio of Observed to Predicted Mortality Rate, Risk Adjusted Mortality and Survival Rates, Number of Dead and time period covered for the data collected.
In 2018, over 1.5 million people died due to poor quality of care in hospitals in the south Asian country of India. Furthermore, over 838 people died due to insufficient access to healthcare in the country during that time.
https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
Notes:
In 2019, the crude mortality rate per thousand inhabitants in Dubai amounted to 2.98. In the same year, the total number of deaths inside the hospitals in Dubai amounted to about 1.5 thousand deaths taking place in private and governmental hospitals.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This scatter chart displays death rate (per 1,000 people) against hospital beds (per 1,000 people). The data is about regions.
By Health [source]
This dataset contains detailed information about 30-day readmission and mortality rates of U.S. hospitals. It is an essential tool for stakeholders aiming to identify opportunities for improving healthcare quality and performance across the country. Providers benefit by having access to comprehensive data regarding readmission, mortality rate, score, measure start/end dates, compared average to national as well as other pertinent metrics like zip codes, phone numbers and county names. Use this data set to conduct evaluations of how hospitals are meeting industry standards from a quality and outcomes perspective in order to make more informed decisions when designing patient care strategies and policies
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
This dataset provides data on 30-day readmission and mortality rates of U.S. hospitals, useful in understanding the quality of healthcare being provided. This data can provide insight into the effectiveness of treatments, patient care, and staff performance at different healthcare facilities throughout the country.
In order to use this dataset effectively, it is important to understand each column and how best to interpret them. The ‘Hospital Name’ column displays the name of the facility; ‘Address’ lists a street address for the hospital; ‘City’ indicates its geographic location; ‘State’ specifies a two-letter abbreviation for that state; ‘ZIP Code’ provides each facility's 5 digit zip code address; 'County Name' specifies what county that particular hospital resides in; 'Phone number' lists a phone contact for any given facility ;'Measure Name' identifies which measure is being recorded (for instance: Elective Delivery Before 39 Weeks); 'Score' value reflects an average score based on patient feedback surveys taken over time frame listed under ' Measure Start Date.' Then there are also columns tracking both lower estimates ('Lower Estimate') as well as higher estimates ('Higher Estimate'); these create variability that can be tracked by researchers seeking further answers or formulating future studies on this topic or field.; Lastly there is one more measure oissociated with this set: ' Footnote,' which may highlight any addional important details pertinent to analysis such as numbers outlying National averages etc..
This data set can be used by hospitals, research facilities and other interested parties in providing inciteful information when making decisions about patient care standards throughout America . It can help find patterns about readmitis/mortality along county lines or answer questions about preformance fluctuations between different hospital locations over an extended amount of time. So if you are ever curious about 30 days readmitted within US Hospitals don't hesitate to dive into this insightful dataset!
- Comparing hospitals on a regional or national basis to measure the quality of care provided for readmission and mortality rates.
- Analyzing the effects of technological advancements such as telemedicine, virtual visits, and AI on readmission and mortality rates at different hospitals.
- Using measures such as Lower Estimate Higher Estimate scores to identify systematic problems in readmissions or mortality rate management at hospitals and informing public health care policy
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.
File: Readmissions_and_Deaths_-_Hospital.csv | Column name | Description | |:-------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Hospital Name ...
In 2023, the hospital mortality rate totaled 4.1 percent in Hungary, marking a decrease from the previous year. The highest figure was recorded in 2021 at 6.1 percent.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This scatter chart displays hospital beds (per 1,000 people) against death rate (per 1,000 people) in the Americas. The data is about regions.
As of 2021, there were 20.5 deaths per 100 hospital admissions for stroke among those aged 45 years and older in Latvia. The statistic shows the thirty-day mortality after admission to hospital for ischaemic stroke in selected OECD countries as of 2021, per 100 admissions among adults aged 45 years and older.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This scatter chart displays hospital beds (per 1,000 people) against death rate (per 1,000 people). The data is about regions.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This scatter chart displays hospital beds (per 1,000 people) against death rate (per 1,000 people) in Oceania. The data is about countries.
The dataset contains risk-adjusted mortality rates, quality ratings, and number of deaths and cases for 6 medical conditions treated (Acute Stroke, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Hip Fracture and Pneumonia) and 3 procedures performed (Carotid Endarterectomy, Pancreatic Resection, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) in California hospitals. The 2023 IMIs were generated using AHRQ Version 2024, while previous years' IMIs were generated with older versions of AHRQ software (2022 IMIs by Version 2023, 2021 IMIs by Version 2022, 2020 IMIs by Version 2021, 2019 IMIs by Version 2020, 2016-2018 IMIs by Version 2019, 2014 and 2015 IMIs by Version 5.0, and 2012 and 2013 IMIs by Version 4.5). The differences in the statistical method employed and inclusion and exclusion criteria using different versions can lead to different results. Users should not compare trends of mortality rates over time. However, many hospitals showed consistent performance over years; “better” performing hospitals may perform better and “worse” performing hospitals may perform worse consistently across years. This dataset does not include conditions treated or procedures performed in outpatient settings. Please refer to statewide table for California overall rates: https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/california-hospital-inpatient-mortality-rates-and-quality-ratings/resource/af88090e-b6f5-4f65-a7ea-d613e6569d96