Key information about Australia Debt Service Ratio: Households

• Australia Debt Service Ratio: Households was reported at 17.500 % in Sep 2024
• This records an increase from the previous number of 17.400 % for Jun 2024
• Australia Debt Service Ratio: Households data is updated quarterly, averaging 15.300 % from Mar 1999 to Sep 2024, with 103 observations
• The data reached an all-time high of 18.200 % in Jun 2008 and a record low of 10.000 % in Mar 1999
• Australia Debt Service Ratio: Households data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank for International Settlements
• The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Banking Sector – Table RC.BIS.DSR: G2 Households (HH) and Non-Profit Institution Serving Households (NPISHs): Quarterly

Key information about Australia Debt Service Ratio: Private Non-Financial Sector

• Australia Debt Service Ratio: Private Non-Financial Sector was reported at 21.500 % in Sep 2024
• This records an increase from the previous number of 21.400 % for Jun 2024
• Australia Debt Service Ratio: Private Non-Financial Sector data is updated quarterly, averaging 20.200 % from Mar 1999 to Sep 2024, with 103 observations
• The data reached an all-time high of 25.000 % in Jun 2008 and a record low of 16.400 % in Mar 2002
• Australia Debt Service Ratio: Private Non-Financial Sector data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank for International Settlements
• The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Banking Sector – Table RC.BIS.DSR: G1 Private Non-Financial Sector (PNF): Quarterly

Australia - Debt service ratio Households & NPISHs

Debt service ratios for private non-financial sector in Australia, December, 2024 The most recent value is 21.7 percent as of Q4 2024, an increase compared to the previous value of 21.5 percent. Historically, the average for Australia from Q1 2000 to Q4 2024 is 20.07 percent. The minimum of 16.4 percent was recorded in Q1 2002, while the maximum of 25 percent was reached in Q2 2008. | TheGlobalEconomy.com

Australiens Debt Service Ratio: Haushalte belief sich im 2024-09 auf 17.500 %. Dies stellt einen Anstieg im Vergleich zu den vorherigen Zahlen von 17.400 % für 2024-06 dar. Australiens Debt Service Ratio: Haushalte werden vierteljährlich aktualisiert, mit einem Durchschnitt von 15.300 % von 1999-03 bis 2024-09, mit 103 Beobachtungen. Die Daten erreichten ein Allzeithoch in Höhe von 18.200 % im 2008-06 und ein Rekordtief in Höhe von 10.000 % im 1999-03. Australiens Debt Service Ratio: Haushalte Daten behalten den Aktiv-Status in CEIC und werden von Bank for International Settlements gemeldet. Die Daten werden unter World Trend Pluss Association: Banking Sector – Table RC.BIS.DSR: G2 Households (HH) and Non-Profit Institution Serving Households (NPISHs): Quarterly kategorisiert.

Debt service ratios for private non-financial sector in Australie, décembre, 2024 Pour cet indicateur, Bank for International Settlements (BIS) fournit des données pour la Australie de Q1 2000 à Q4 2024. La valeur moyenne pour Australie pendant cette période était de 20.07 pour cent avec un minimum de 16.4 pour cent en Q1 2002 et un maximum de 25 pour cent en Q2 2008. | TheGlobalEconomy.com

Overview
This report presents the detailed financial performance estimates of dairy farmers in 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, and discusses incomes, investment, farm debt, and costs of production in a historical context. The report draws on data from the ABARES annual Australian Dairy Industry Survey (ADIS).

This report is a collation of chapters that have been previously published online.

Farm financial performance (published 18 May 2017) This chapter presents estimates of the incomes, profits, costs and rates of return for dairy farms. Key Issues
Average farm cash income of Australian dairy farms is projected to decrease by around 18 per cent in 2016-17 to $105,000 per farm. Farm cash income in 2016-17 is projected to be an estimated 8 per cent lower than the average between 2000-01 and 2015-16 (in real terms*). The expected decrease in incomes is a result of reduced milk production per farm and lower milk receipts due to low prices.

• Note: real dollar values are adjusted to remove the effect of inflation.

Farm debt and equity (published 12 July 2017) This chapter presents estimates of the debt, equity, and debt-servicing capacity for dairy farms. Key Issues
Average farm debt of Australian dairy farms is estimate to have increased by around 2 per cent to $956,000 in 2015-16 (in 2016–17 dollars). Average dairy farm debt is projected to decrease by around 6 per cent in 2016-17. The average equity ratio of dairy farms at the national level declined from 85 per cent in 2004-05 to an estimated 79 per cent in 2015-16. The proportion of farm receipts needed to fund interest payments is projected to fall to just under 7 per cent in 2016-17.

Farm capital and investment (published 8 August 2017) This chapter presents estimates of farm capital and farm investment for dairy farms. Key Issues
The total value of capital for Australian dairy farms increased by 40 per cent in real terms from 2000-01 to 2015-16. On a per farm basis, total capital increased by 133 per cent to around $4.5 million per farm in 2015-16. The average value of land and fixed improvements per hectare for dairy farms increased by 76 per cent from 2000-01 to 2015-16, with an average annual return on land appreciation of 3.9 per cent.

Physical characteristics (published 9 November 2017) This chapter presents estimates of physical characteristics for dairy farms. Key Issues
From 2000-01 to 2015-16 the number of Australian dairy farms fell by 45 per cent. Although most of this decline was in Victoria, the largest percentage decline was in Queensland. The concentration of Australian milk production among the states has shifted considerably, with Victoria and Tasmania expanding their milk production and all other states contracting since 2000-01. Total milk production increased in Tasmania from 2000-01 to 2015-16 but decline in all other states.

As of November 2024, the average owner-occupier home loan interest rate was the highest in the Australian state of Western Australia, with an average rate of around **** percent. In comparison, the average mortgage interest rate in Victoria was at around **** percent.

Overview
This report presents the detailed financial performance of beef cattle producing farms in 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, and discusses incomes, investment, farm debt, and costs of beef production in a historical context. The report draws on data from the ABARES annual Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey (AAGIS). The report was commissioned by Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA)

This report is a collation of chapters that have been previously published online.

Farm financial performance (published 18 May 2017) This chapter presents estimates of the incomes, profits, costs and rates of return for beef farms. Key Issues
Average farm cash income of Australian beef farms is projected to increase by around 10 per cent in 2016-17 to $204,000 per farm. Farm cash income in 2016-17 is projected to be the highest in over 20 years, an estimated 108 per cent higher than the average between 2000-01 and 2015-16 (in real terms*). The expected increase in incomes is a result of higher beef cattle prices.

• Note: real dollar values are adjusted to remove the effect of inflation.

Farm debt and equity (published 12 July 2017) This chapter presents estimates of the debt, equity, and debt-servicing capacity for beef farms. Key Issues
Average farm debt of Australian beef farms is estimated to have increased by around 9 per cent to $497,000 in 2015-16 (in 2016-17 dollars). Average farm debt for beef farms is projected to decrease slightly in 2016-17. The average equity ratio of beef farms has remained steady at around 90 per cent from 2000-01 to 2015-16. The proportion of farm receipts needed to fund interest payments is projected to be around 6 per cent in 2016-17.

Farm capital and investment (published 8 August 2017) This chapter presents estimates of farm capital and farm investment for beef farms. Key Issues
The total value of capital for Australian beef farms increased by around 55 per cent in real terms from 2000-01 to 2015-16. On a per farm basis, total capital increased by 98 per cent to an estimated $5.4 million per farm in 2015-16. The average value of land and fixed improvements per hectare for beef farms increased by 105 per cent from 2000-01 to 2015-16, with an average annual return on land appreciation of 5.2 per cent.

Physical characteristics (published 9 November 2017) This chapter presents estimates of physical characteristics for beef farms. Key Issues
From 2000-01 to 2015-16 the total number of Australian beef farms fell by 22 per cent. Most of the decline was in the Southern region with the number of beef farms in the Northern region remaining relatively unchanged. Over the period, the total number of beef cattle in the Northern region increased while the number of cattle in the Southern region remained relatively steady.

Cost of production (published 28 September 2017) This chapter presents and discusses cost of production estimates for beef farms. Key Issues
Over the three years to 2015-16 the average total cost of beef production was similar in northern and southern Australia, at 193 cents per kilogram live weight in northern Australia and 199 cents in southern Australia. The on-farm per kilogram live weight cost of beef production increased between 2013-14 and 2015-16. Higher beef cattle prices in 2014-15 and 2015-16 resulted in operating margins increasing relative to the very low margins recorded in 2013-14. Total costs of production per kilogram in southern and northern Australia declined as herd size increased. Small beef farms (with less than 400 beef cattle) generally covered their cash operating costs. However, most did not cover capital depreciation or the value of unpaid owner-manager, partner and family labour.

Average on-farm per kilogram live weight cost of beef production declined over the three years to 2016–17.

Overview
This report presents the detailed financial performance estimates of grain farmers in 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, and discusses incomes, investment, farm debt, and costs of production in a historical context. The report draws on data from the ABARES annual Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey (AAGIS).

This report is a collation of chapters that have been previously published online.

Farm financial performance (published 18 May 2017) This chapter presents estimates of the incomes, profits, costs and rates of return for grain farms. Key Issues
Average farm cash income of Australian grain farms is projected to increase by around 27 per cent in 2016-17 to $290,000 per farm. Farm cash income in 2016-17 is projected to be the highest in over 20 years, an estimated 85 per cent higher than the average between 2000-01 and 2015-16 (in real terms*). The expected increase in incomes is a result of increased production of wheat, barley and oilseeds.

• Note: real dollar values are adjusted to remove the effect of inflation.

Farm debt and equity (published 12 July 2017) This chapter presents estimates of the debt, equity, and debt-servicing capacity for grain farms. Key Issues
Average farm debt of Australian grain farms is estimated to have increased by around 2 per cent to around $853,000 in 2015-16 (in 2016-17 dollars). Average grain farm debt is projected to increase a further 3 per cent in 2016-17. From 2000-01 to 2015-16 the average equity ratio of grain farms has fluctuated around 85 per cent. The average proportion of farm receipts needed to fund interest payments is projected to fall to just under 6 per cent in 2016-17.

Farm capital and investment (published 8 August 2017) This chapter presents estimates of farm capital and farm investment for grain farms. Key Issues
The total value of capital for Australian grain farms increased by 77 per cent in real terms from 2000-01 to 2015-16. On a per farm basis, total capital more than doubled to around $5.9 million per farm. The average value of land and fixed improvements per hectare of grain farms doubled from 2000-01 to 2015-16, with an average annual return on land appreciation of 5.2 per cent.

Physical characteristics (published 9 November 2017) This chapter presents estimates of physical characteristics for grain farms. Key Issues
From 2000–01 to 2015–16 the number of Australian farms sowing at least 40 hectares sown to grains, oilseeds or pulses fell by 27 per cent. The number of grain farms planting more than 1,200 hectares of grains increased with these larger farms accounting for an increased share of total output of grains, pulses and oilseeds. Total Australian grain production in 2015–16 was higher than in 2000–01 despite fewer grain farms and seasonal variations in production.

Overview \r This report presents the detailed financial performance estimates of grain farmers in 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17, and discusses incomes, investment, farm debt, and costs of production in a historical context. The report draws on data from the ABARES annual Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey (AAGIS). \r \r This report is a collation of chapters that have been previously published online. \r \r Farm financial performance (published 18 May 2017) \r This chapter presents estimates of the incomes, profits, costs and rates of return for grain farms. \r Key Issues \r Average farm cash income of Australian grain farms is projected to increase by around 27 per cent in 2016-17 to $290,000 per farm. Farm cash income in 2016-17 is projected to be the highest in over 20 years, an estimated 85 per cent higher than the average between 2000-01 and 2015-16 (in real terms*). The expected increase in incomes is a result of increased production of wheat, barley and oilseeds. \r \r * Note: real dollar values are adjusted to remove the effect of inflation. \r \r Farm debt and equity (published 12 July 2017) \r This chapter presents estimates of the debt, equity, and debt-servicing capacity for grain farms. \r Key Issues \r Average farm debt of Australian grain farms is estimated to have increased by around 2 per cent to around $853,000 in 2015-16 (in 2016-17 dollars). Average grain farm debt is projected to increase a further 3 per cent in 2016-17. From 2000-01 to 2015-16 the average equity ratio of grain farms has fluctuated around 85 per cent. The average proportion of farm receipts needed to fund interest payments is projected to fall to just under 6 per cent in 2016-17. \r \r Farm capital and investment (published 8 August 2017) \r This chapter presents estimates of farm capital and farm investment for grain farms. \r Key Issues \r The total value of capital for Australian grain farms increased by 77 per cent in real terms from 2000-01 to 2015-16. On a per farm basis, total capital more than doubled to around $5.9 million per farm. The average value of land and fixed improvements per hectare of grain farms doubled from 2000-01 to 2015-16, with an average annual return on land appreciation of 5.2 per cent. \r \r Physical characteristics (published 9 November 2017) \r This chapter presents estimates of physical characteristics for grain farms. \r Key Issues \r From 2000–01 to 2015–16 the number of Australian farms sowing at least 40 hectares sown to grains, oilseeds or pulses fell by 27 per cent. The number of grain farms planting more than 1,200 hectares of grains increased with these larger farms accounting for an increased share of total output of grains, pulses and oilseeds. Total Australian grain production in 2015–16 was higher than in 2000–01 despite fewer grain farms and seasonal variations in production. \r

This report presents detailed financial performance of slaughter lamb producing farms in 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15 and discusses productivity in a historical context. The report was commissioned by Meat & Livestock Australia (MLA) and expands on results that were published in Agricultural Commodities (March quarter 2015) and the Australian farm survey results 2012-13 to 2014-15 report released in March 2015.

Key Issues
• Most farms producing lambs for slaughter are mixed enterprises, deriving receipts from cropping, beef cattle, sheep and wool and from the sale of slaughter lambs. • Farm cash income of specialist slaughter lamb producing farms, those farms most reliant on lamb production, is estimated to have increased from an average of $80 900 a farm in 2013-14 to $98 300 a farm in 2014-15. This increase was mainly a result of higher prices for lambs and sheep. • Farm cash incomes and business profit of all slaughter lamb producers are estimated to have fallen in 2014-15 compared with 2013-14. Reduced grain production in 2014-15 is estimated to have resulted in lower average total receipts of slaughter lamb producing farms despite an increase in sheep and lamb receipts mainly a result of increased prices. Average farm cash income of slaughter lamb producers is estimated to have declined by 8 per cent from an average of $180 100 a farm in 2013-14 to $166 000 a farm in 2014-15, in real terms. • Farm debt of slaughter lamb producing farms averaged $649 577 a farm in 2013-14, slightly more than that in 2012-13 ($641 400). Farm debt is estimated to have reduced in 2014-15 compared with 2013-14 as a result of loan repayment and reductions in new borrowings. • Asset values and new investment remain high for slaughter lamb producing farms and while debt is also high, equity ratios and debt servicing are in line with long-term averages.

호주의 부채 비율 : 민간 비 금융 부문은 2024-09에 21.500 %로 보고 되었습니다. 이는 2024-06에 21.400 %라는 이전 수치에 비 해상승한 기록입니다.호주의 부채 비율 : 민간 비 금융 부문 데이터는 계간지마다 업데이트 되며,103개의 관측으로 1999-03부터 2024-09사이에 평균 20.200 %입니다. 이 데이터는2008-06에 25.000 %라는사상 최고치를, 2002-03에 16.400 %라는 최저치를 기록했습니다. 호주’의 부채 비율 : 민간 비 금융 부문 데이터는 CEIC에 활성 상태로 남아 있으며Bank for International Settlements에 의해 보고되는 정보입니다. 본 데이터는 World Trend Plus의 Association: Banking Sector - Table RC.BIS.DSR: G1 Private Non-Financial Sector (PNF): Quarterly하에 분류 됩니다.

Australiens Debt Service Ratio: Private Non-Financial Sector belief sich im 2024-09 auf 21.500 %. Dies stellt einen Anstieg im Vergleich zu den vorherigen Zahlen von 21.400 % für 2024-06 dar. Australiens Debt Service Ratio: Private Non-Financial Sector werden vierteljährlich aktualisiert, mit einem Durchschnitt von 20.200 % von 1999-03 bis 2024-09, mit 103 Beobachtungen. Die Daten erreichten ein Allzeithoch in Höhe von 25.000 % im 2008-06 und ein Rekordtief in Höhe von 16.400 % im 2002-03. Australiens Debt Service Ratio: Private Non-Financial Sector Daten behalten den Aktiv-Status in CEIC und werden von Bank for International Settlements gemeldet. Die Daten werden unter World Trend Pluss Association: Banking Sector – Table RC.BIS.DSR: G1 Private Non-Financial Sector (PNF): Quarterly kategorisiert.

호주의 부채 비율 : 가구은 2024-09에 17.500 %로 보고 되었습니다. 이는 2024-06에 17.400 %라는 이전 수치에 비 해상승한 기록입니다.호주의 부채 비율 : 가구 데이터는 계간지마다 업데이트 되며,103개의 관측으로 1999-03부터 2024-09사이에 평균 15.300 %입니다. 이 데이터는2008-06에 18.200 %라는사상 최고치를, 1999-03에 10.000 %라는 최저치를 기록했습니다. 호주’의 부채 비율 : 가구 데이터는 CEIC에 활성 상태로 남아 있으며Bank for International Settlements에 의해 보고되는 정보입니다. 본 데이터는 World Trend Plus의 Association: Banking Sector - Table RC.BIS.DSR: G2 Households (HH) and Non-Profit Institution Serving Households (NPISHs): Quarterly하에 분류 됩니다.

Snapshot img

Payday Loans Market Size 2025-2029

The payday loans market size is forecast to increase by USD 9.9 billion, at a CAGR of 4.5% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is characterized by growing awareness among the youth demographic and an increasing number of lenders offering these services. Simultaneously, payday loans face criticism for being perceived as predatory due to their high interest rates and potential for debt trap situations. These trends present both opportunities and challenges for market participants. On one hand, the expanding awareness and acceptance of payday loans among younger generations signify a potential customer base ripe for growth. Moreover, the increasing competition among payday lenders fosters innovation and improved customer service, potentially enhancing the overall market appeal. On the other hand, the negative perception surrounding payday loans poses a significant challenge.
The predatory nature of these loans can lead to long-term financial hardships for borrowers, prompting regulatory scrutiny and potential restrictions. As such, market players must navigate this delicate balance between meeting consumer demand and addressing concerns regarding ethical lending practices. To capitalize on market opportunities and effectively manage challenges, companies must focus on transparency, responsible lending practices, and effective communication with their customer base.

What will be the Size of the Payday Loans Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The market continues to evolve, shaped by a complex interplay of factors including responsible lending practices, financial hardship, and the growing prevalence of online lending. Cash advances and payday loans serve as crucial financial solutions for individuals facing economic hardship, yet concerns around predatory lending, fraud prevention, and ethical considerations persist. Credit counseling and debt relief options have emerged as essential components of the market, offering debt management and financial planning resources to borrowers. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are increasingly utilized for loan origination and risk assessment, enhancing the application process and improving risk management. Prepayment penalties, interest rates, and financial literacy remain key areas of focus, with consumers demanding greater transparency and affordability.

Compliance management and government regulation are critical in ensuring fair lending practices and protecting consumers from identity theft and data security breaches. Third-party lenders and direct lenders have expanded their offerings, providing alternatives to traditional banking services such as overdraft protection and loan consolidation. Debt consolidation and income inequality have fueled the growth of alternative lending solutions, while the use of big data and credit scores streamlines the loan origination process. Financial education and consumer finance play a vital role in fostering financial inclusion and breaking the debt cycle. Repayment schedules, loan terms, and late fees are subjects of ongoing debate, with legal frameworks and public policy shaping the market's future trajectory.

The market's continuous dynamism underscores the importance of staying informed and adaptive to the evolving landscape. From credit checks and loan terms to risk management and ethical considerations, the industry's ongoing transformation offers opportunities and challenges for all stakeholders.

How is this Payday Loans Industry segmented?

The payday loans industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Type

  Storefront payday loans
  Online payday loans


Consumer

  Single
  Married


Age Group

  31-40
  21-30
  51 and above
  41-50
  Less than 21


Loan Type

  Small (U$500)
  Medium (U$500-U$1500)
  Large (U$1500)


Consumer Segment

  Individual
  Small Businesses


Geography

  North America

    US
    Mexico


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    Italy
    UK


  Middle East and Africa

    UAE


  APAC

    Australia
    China
    India
    Japan
    South Korea


  South America

    Brazil


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Type Insights

The storefront payday loans segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The market encompasses various entities, including online lending, responsible lending, financial hardship, cash advance, payday advance, credit counseling, debt relief, economic hardship, debt management, artificial intelligence, legal frameworks, social welfare, data security, predatory

オーストラリアの債務返済率:家計は、2024-09に17.500 %を記録しました。前期2024-06の 17.400 %と比べると上昇の結果となりました。オーストラリアの債務返済率:家計は四半期で更新され、1999-03から2024-09の103つの値で平均は 15.300 %。最高値は2008-06の18.200 %、最低値は1999-03の10.000 %。債務返済率:家計はActiveステータスデータであり、Bank for International Settlementsが発表元です。当データは、World Trend PlusのAssociation: Banking Sector – Table RC.BIS.DSR: G2 Households (HH) and Non-Profit Institution Serving Households (NPISHs): Quarterlyに格納されています。

Rasio Layanan Utang: Rumah Tangga Australia dilaporkan sebesar 17.500 % pada 2024-09. Rekor ini naik dibanding sebelumnya yaitu 17.400 % untuk 2024-06. Data Rasio Layanan Utang: Rumah Tangga Australia diperbarui triwulanan, dengan rata-rata 15.300 % dari 1999-03 sampai 2024-09, dengan 103 observasi. Data ini mencapai angka tertinggi sebesar 18.200 % pada 2008-06 dan rekor terendah sebesar 10.000 % pada 1999-03. Data Rasio Layanan Utang: Rumah Tangga Australia tetap berstatus aktif di CEIC dan dilaporkan oleh Bank for International Settlements. Data dikategorikan dalam Association: Banking Sector World Trend Plus – Table RC.BIS.DSR: G2 Households (HH) and Non-Profit Institution Serving Households (NPISHs): Quarterly.

澳大利亚的债务比率：私人非金融部门在09-01-2024达21.500%，相较于06-01-2024的21.400%有所增长。澳大利亚债务比率：私人非金融部门数据按季更新，03-01-1999至09-01-2024期间平均值为20.200%，共103份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于06-01-2008，达25.000%，而历史最低值则出现于03-01-2002，为16.400%。CEIC提供的澳大利亚债务比率：私人非金融部门数据处于定期更新的状态，数据来源于Bank for International Settlements，数据归类于世界趋势数据库的机构：银行业 – 表 RC.BIS.DSR：G1私营非金融部门（PNF）：季度。

Os dados de Rácio de serviço da dívida: famílias da Austrália foram registrados em 17.500 % em 2024-09. Este é um registro de um aumento com relação aos números anteriores de 17.400 % em 2024-06. Os dados de Rácio de serviço da dívida: famílias da Austrália são atualizados trimestral, com uma média de 15.300 % em 1999-03 até 2024-09, com 103 observações. Os dados alcançaram um alto recorde de 18.200 % em 2008-06 e um baixo recorde de 10.000 % em 1999-03. Os dados de Rácio de serviço da dívida: famílias da Austrália permanecem com status ativo na CEIC e são reportados pela fonte: Bank for International Settlements. Os dados são classificados sob o World Trend Plus’ Association: Banking Sector – Table RC.BIS.DSR: G2 Households (HH) and Non-Profit Institution Serving Households (NPISHs): Quarterly.