This data deposit documents additional analyses performed by Barnas et al. (2024) Global Change Biology, in response to the published paper Dickie et al. (2024) Global Change Biology. This data deposit contains the original data used by Dickie et al., and for further information on the raw data and details on collection, users should reference the original paper. The main file of interest in this deposit is the file of R code containing the additional analyses making up the main part of our response: FinalManuscriptCode_Barnas_et_al_scale_exploration.Rmd

pone.0267385.t001 - The effects of population management on wild ungulates: A systematic map of evidence for UK species

A ubiquitous interaction operates at the base of food webs in many terrestrial ecosystems of the world, creating the foundation for bottom-up regulation of consumers. This interaction plays out as follows. Populations of herbivores deplete plant biomass by foraging. Increasing herbivore population size intensifies this depletion, which in turn, creates a negative feedback regulating herbivore population growth. Large herbivores and the plants they consume offer a useful system for studying this interaction because populations of large herbivores are often regulated by density dependence, defined as the reduction in the per-capita growth rate that occurs as populations grow. Diminished body mass of individuals has been repeatedly observed in high-density populations, implicating plant-mediated, diminished nutrition as the primary cause of density dependence. However, there is no general explanation for why these nutritional deficiencies occur. The data deposited here were used to demonstrate fit new model of the feedbacks from plant biomass to herbivores. The model shows how reduced nutrition of herbivores can result from increased dilution of metabolizable energy in the plant tissue they consume as populations grow even when a large fraction of the consumable plant biomass remains uneaten. This result provides a tidy, mechanistic explanation for bottom-up control of population dynamics of primary consumers in a “green world.” Methods Methods and sampling design are described in: S. J. Wagoner, L. A. Shipley, R. C. Cook, and L. Hardesty. Spring cattle grazing and mule deer nutrition in a bluebunch wheatgrass community. Journal of Wildlife Management, 77(5):897–907, 2013. A. C. Ulappa, L. A. Shipley, R. C. Cook, J. G. Cook, and M. E. Swanson. Silvicultural herbicides and forest succession influence understory vegetation and nutritional ecology of black-tailed deer in managed forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 470, 2020. I. T. Hull, L. A. Shipley, S. L. Berry, C. Loggers, and T. R. Johnson. Effects of fuel reduction timber harvests on forage resources for deer in northeastern Washington. Forest Ecology and Management, 458, 2020. N. T. Hobbs, in press. A general, resource-based explanation for density dependence in populations of large herbivores. Ecological Monographs.

Outcomes are categorised and assigned to a broad outcome class.