Facebook
TwitterProduct contains one data file (.csv format) for each year from 2006-2022. Records provide information about family demographics, dwelling characteristics, home value, income, years in residence & detailed geographic identifiers. Note: These data files are large (9-14GB each) and cannot be delivered through the Borealis platform. Please contact the Map and Data Library to arrange access: https://mdl.library.utoronto.ca/about/contact-form.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36801/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36801/terms
The 2015 American Housing Survey marks the first release of a newly integrated national sample and independent metropolitan area samples. The 2015 release features many variable name revisions, as well as the integration of an AHS Codebook Interactive Tool available on the U.S. Census Bureau We site. This data collection provides information on the characteristics of a national sample of housing units in 2015, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, and vacant housing units. Data from the 15 largest metropolitan areas in the United States are included in the national sample survey (the AHS 2015 Metropolitan Data are also available as ICPSR 36805). The data are presented in three separate parts: Part 1, Household Record (Main Record), Part 2, Person Record, and Part 3, Project Record. Household Record data includes questions about household occupancy and tenure, household exterior and interior structural features, household equipment and appliances, housing problems, housing costs, home improvement, neighborhood features, recent moving information, income, and basic demographic information. The household record data also features four rotating topical modules: Arts and Culture, Food Security, Housing Counseling, and Healthy Homes. Person Record data includes questions about personal disabilities, income, and basic demographic information. Finally, the Project Record data includes questions about home improvement projects. Specific questions were asked about the types of projects, costs, funding sources, and year of completion.
Facebook
TwitterThis map uses a two-color thematic shading to emphasize where areas experience the least to the most affordable housing across the US. This web map is part of the How Affordable is the American Dream story map.
Esri’s Housing Affordability Index (HAI) is a powerful tool to analyze local real estate markets. Esri’s housing affordability index measures the financial ability of a typical household to purchase an existing home in an area. A HAI of 100 represents an area that on average has sufficient household income to qualify for a loan on a home valued at the median home price. An index greater than 100 suggests homes are easily afforded by the average area resident. A HAI less than 100 suggests that homes are less affordable. The housing affordability index is not applicable in areas with no households or in predominantly rental markets . Esri’s home value estimates cover owner-occupied homes only. For a full demographic analysis of US growth refer to Esri's Trending in 2017: The Selectivity of Growth.
The pop-up is configured to show the following 2017 demographics for each County and ZIP Code:
Total Households 2010-17 Annual Pop Change Median Age Percent Owner-Occupied Housing Units Median Household Income Median Home Value Housing Affordability Index Share of Income to Mortgage
Facebook
TwitterData on resident buyers who are persons that purchased a residential property in a market sale and filed their T1 tax return form: number of and incomes of residential property buyers, sale price, price-to-income ratio by the number of buyers as part of a sale, age groups, first-time home buyer status, buyer characteristics (sex, family type, immigration status, period of immigration, admission category).
Facebook
TwitterComprehensive demographic dataset for Acres Home, Houston, TX, US including population statistics, household income, housing units, education levels, employment data, and transportation with year-over-year changes.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/4204/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/4204/terms
This is a special extract of the 2000 Census 5-Percent Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) created by the National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging (NACDA). The file combines the individual 5-percent state files for all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico as released by the United States Census Bureau into a single analysis file. The file contains information on all households that contain at least one person aged 65 years or more in residence as of the 2000 Census enumeration. The file contains individual records on all persons aged 65 and older living in households as well as individual records for all other members residing in each of these households. Consequently, this file can be used to examine both the characteristics of the elderly in the United States as well as the characteristics of individuals who co-reside with persons aged 65 and older as of the year 2000. All household variables from the household-specific "Household record" of the 2000 PUMS are appended to the end of each individual level record. This file is not a special product of the Census Bureau and is not a resample of the PUMS data specific to the elderly population. While it is comparable to the 1990 release CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1990: [UNITED STATES]: PUBLIC USE MICRODATA SAMPLE: 3-PERCENT ELDERLY SAMPLE (ICPSR 6219), the sampling procedures and weights for the 2000 file reflect the methodology that applies to the 5-percent PUMS release CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 2000 [UNITED STATES]: PUBLIC USE MICRODATA SAMPLE: 5-PERCENT SAMPLE (ICPSR 13568). Person variables cover age, sex, relationship to householder, educational attainment, school enrollment, race, Hispanic origin, ancestry, language spoken at home, citizenship, place of birth, year of immigration, place of residence in 1985, marital status, number of children ever born, military service, mobility and personal care limitation, work limitation status, employment status, occupation, industry, class of worker, hours worked last week, weeks worked in 1989, usual hours worked per week, temporary absence from work, place of work, time of departure for work, travel time to work, means of transportation to work, total earnings, total income, wages and salary income, farm and nonfarm self-employment income, Social Security income, public assistance income, retirement income, and rent, dividends, and net rental income. Housing variables include area type, state and area of residence, farm/nonfarm status, type of structure, year structure was built, vacancy and boarded-up status, number of rooms and bedrooms, presence or absence of a telephone, presence or absence of complete kitchen and plumbing facilities, type of sewage facilities, type of water source, type of heating fuel used, property value, tenure, year moved into house/apartment, type of household/family, type of group quarters, household language, number of persons in the household, number of persons and workers in the family, status of mortgage, second mortgage, and home equity loan, number of vehicles available, household income, sales of agricultural products, payments for rent, mortgage and property tax, condominium fees, mobile home costs, and cost of electricity, water, heating fuel, and flood/fire/hazard insurance.
Facebook
TwitterExplore the dataset and potentially gain valuable insight into your data science project through interesting features. The dataset was developed for a portfolio optimization graduate project I was working on. The goal was to the monetize risk of company deleveraging by associated with changes in economic data. Applications of the dataset may include. To see the data in action visit my analytics page. Analytics Page & Dashboard and to access all 295,000+ records click here.
For any questions, you may reach us at research_development@goldenoakresearch.com. For immediate assistance, you may reach me on at 585-626-2965. Please Note: the number is my personal number and email is preferred
Note: in total there are 75 fields the following are just themes the fields fall under Home Owner Costs: Sum of utilities, property taxes.
2012-2016 ACS 5-Year Documentation was provided by the U.S. Census Reports. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from
Providing you the potential to monetize risk and optimize your investment portfolio through quality economic features at unbeatable price. Access all 295,000+ records on an incredibly small scale, see links below for more details:
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/6497/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/6497/terms
This dataset, prepared by the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, comprises 2 percent of the cases in the second release of CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1990 [UNITED STATES]: PUBLIC USE MICRODATA SAMPLE: 5-PERCENT SAMPLE (ICPSR 9952). As 2 percent of the 5-percent Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), it constitutes a 1-in-1,000 sample, and contains all housing and population variables in the original 5-percent PUMS. Housing variables include area type, state and area of residence, farm/nonfarm status, type of structure, year structure was built, vacancy and boarded-up status, number of rooms and bedrooms, presence or absence of a telephone, presence or absence of complete kitchen and plumbing facilities, type of sewage, water source, and heating fuel used, property value, tenure, year moved into housing unit, type of household/family, type of group quarters, household language, number of persons, related children, own/adopted children, and stepchildren in the household, number of persons and workers in the family, status of mortgage, second mortgage, and home equity loan, number of vehicles available, household income, sales of agricultural products, payments for rent, mortgage, and property tax, condominium fees, mobile home costs, and cost of electricity, water, heating fuel, and flood/fire/hazard insurance. Person variables cover age, sex, relationship to householder, educational attainment, school enrollment, race, Hispanic origin, ancestry, language spoken at home, citizenship, place of birth, year of immigration, place of residence in 1985, marital status, number of children ever born, presence and age of own children, military service, mobility and personal care limitation, work limitation status, employment status, employment status of parents, occupation, industry, class of worker, hours worked last week, weeks worked in 1989, usual hours worked per week, temporary absence from work, place of work, time of departure for work, travel time to work, means of transportation to work, number of occupants in vehicle during ride to work, total earnings, total income, wages and salary income, farm and nonfarm self-employment income, Social Security income, public assistance income, retirement income, and rent, dividends, and net rental income.
Facebook
TwitterA computerized data set of demographic, economic and social data for 227 countries of the world. Information presented includes population, health, nutrition, mortality, fertility, family planning and contraceptive use, literacy, housing, and economic activity data. Tabular data are broken down by such variables as age, sex, and urban/rural residence. Data are organized as a series of statistical tables identified by country and table number. Each record consists of the data values associated with a single row of a given table. There are 105 tables with data for 208 countries. The second file is a note file, containing text of notes associated with various tables. These notes provide information such as definitions of categories (i.e. urban/rural) and how various values were calculated. The IDB was created in the U.S. Census Bureau''s International Programs Center (IPC) to help IPC staff meet the needs of organizations that sponsor IPC research. The IDB provides quick access to specialized information, with emphasis on demographic measures, for individual countries or groups of countries. The IDB combines data from country sources (typically censuses and surveys) with IPC estimates and projections to provide information dating back as far as 1950 and as far ahead as 2050. Because the IDB is maintained as a research tool for IPC sponsor requirements, the amount of information available may vary by country. As funding and research activity permit, the IPC updates and expands the data base content. Types of data include: * Population by age and sex * Vital rates, infant mortality, and life tables * Fertility and child survivorship * Migration * Marital status * Family planning Data characteristics: * Temporal: Selected years, 1950present, projected demographic data to 2050. * Spatial: 227 countries and areas. * Resolution: National population, selected data by urban/rural * residence, selected data by age and sex. Sources of data include: * U.S. Census Bureau * International projects (e.g., the Demographic and Health Survey) * United Nations agencies Links: * ICPSR: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/08490
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9693/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9693/terms
This extraction of data from 1980 decennial Census files (CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING, 1980 [UNITED STATES]: SUMMARY TAPE FILES 3A AND 3B [ICPSR 8071, 8318]) was designed to provide a set of contextual variables to be matched to any survey dataset that has been coded for the geographic location of respondents, such as the PANEL STUDY OF INCOME DYNAMICS, 1968-1988 (ICPSR 7439). This geographic area data can also be analyzed independently with neighborhoods, labor market areas, etc., as the units of analysis. Over 120 variables were selected from the original Census sources, and more than 100 variables were derived from those component variables. The variables characterize geographic areas in terms of population counts, ethnicity, family structure, income and poverty, education, residential mobility, labor force activity, and housing. The geographic areas range from neighborhoods, through intermediate levels of geography, through large economic areas, and beyond to large regions. These variables were selected from the Census data for their relevance to problems associated with poverty and income determination, and 80 percent were present in comparable form in both the 1970 and 1980 Census datasets.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/6219/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/6219/terms
These data from the 1990 Census comprise a sample of households with at least one person 60 years and older, plus a sample of persons 60 years and older in group quarters. The data are grouped into housing variables and person variables. Housing variables include area type, state and area of residence, farm/nonfarm status, type of structure, year structure was built, vacancy and boarded-up status, number of rooms and bedrooms, presence or absence of a telephone, presence or absence of complete kitchen and plumbing facilities, type of sewage facilities, type of water source, type of heating fuel used, property value, tenure, year moved into house/apartment, type of household/family, type of group quarters, household language, number of persons in the household, number of persons and workers in the family, status of mortgage, second mortgage, and home equity loan, number of vehicles available, household income, sales of agricultural products, payments for rent, mortgage and property tax, condominium fees, mobile home costs, and cost of electricity, water, heating fuel, and flood/fire/hazard insurance. Person variables cover age, sex, relationship to householder, educational attainment, school enrollment, race, Hispanic origin, ancestry, language spoken at home, citizenship, place of birth, year of immigration, place of residence in 1985, marital status, number of children ever born, military service, mobility and personal care limitation, work limitation status, employment status, occupation, industry, class of worker, hours worked last week, weeks worked in 1989, usual hours worked per week, temporary absence from work, place of work, time of departure for work, travel time to work, means of transportation to work, total earnings, total income, wages and salary income, farm and nonfarm self-employment income, Social Security income, public assistance income, retirement income, and rent, dividends, and net rental income.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents the median household income across different racial categories in Mountain Home. It portrays the median household income of the head of household across racial categories (excluding ethnicity) as identified by the Census Bureau. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into economic disparities and trends and explore the variations in median houshold income for diverse racial categories.
Key observations
Based on our analysis of the distribution of Mountain Home population by race & ethnicity, the population is predominantly White. This particular racial category constitutes the majority, accounting for 79.86% of the total residents in Mountain Home. Notably, the median household income for White households is $52,558. Interestingly, despite the White population being the most populous, it is worth noting that Asian households actually reports the highest median household income, with a median income of $91,938. This reveals that, while Whites may be the most numerous in Mountain Home, Asian households experience greater economic prosperity in terms of median household income.
https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/mountain-home-id-median-household-income-by-race.jpeg" alt="Mountain Home median household income diversity across racial categories">
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.
Racial categories include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Mountain Home median household income by race. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterComprehensive demographic dataset for Home Park, Atlanta, GA, US including population statistics, household income, housing units, education levels, employment data, and transportation with year-over-year changes.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents the median household income across different racial categories in Sweet Home. It portrays the median household income of the head of household across racial categories (excluding ethnicity) as identified by the Census Bureau. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into economic disparities and trends and explore the variations in median houshold income for diverse racial categories.
Key observations
Based on our analysis of the distribution of Sweet Home population by race & ethnicity, the population is predominantly White. This particular racial category constitutes the majority, accounting for 86.57% of the total residents in Sweet Home. Notably, the median household income for White households is $58,553. Interestingly, despite the White population being the most populous, it is worth noting that Two or More Races households actually reports the highest median household income, with a median income of $110,347. This reveals that, while Whites may be the most numerous in Sweet Home, Two or More Races households experience greater economic prosperity in terms of median household income.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.
Racial categories include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Sweet Home median household income by race. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterThis web map shows a comparison of owner occupied housing and the median home value for counties, tracts, and block groups in the US in 2018. Yellow areas have over 50% of households occupied by the home owner. A large symbol denotes a larger median home value. The popup is configured to show the following:% Owner occupied housingCount of owner occupied housesCount of renter occupied housesTotal householdsMedian home valueHousehold income by rangeThe source of the data is Esri's 2018 demographic estimates. For more information about Esri's demographic data, visit the Updated Demographics documentation.
Facebook
TwitterHow does your organization use this dataset? What other NYSERDA or energy-related datasets would you like to see on Open NY? Let us know by emailing OpenNY@nyserda.ny.gov. The Low- to Moderate-Income (LMI) New York State (NYS) Census Population Analysis dataset is resultant from the LMI market database designed by APPRISE as part of the NYSERDA LMI Market Characterization Study (https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/lmi-tool). All data are derived from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 1-year Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) files for 2013, 2014, and 2015. Each row in the LMI dataset is an individual record for a household that responded to the survey and each column is a variable of interest for analyzing the low- to moderate-income population. The LMI dataset includes: county/county group, households with elderly, households with children, economic development region, income groups, percent of poverty level, low- to moderate-income groups, household type, non-elderly disabled indicator, race/ethnicity, linguistic isolation, housing unit type, owner-renter status, main heating fuel type, home energy payment method, housing vintage, LMI study region, LMI population segment, mortgage indicator, time in home, head of household education level, head of household age, and household weight. The LMI NYS Census Population Analysis dataset is intended for users who want to explore the underlying data that supports the LMI Analysis Tool. The majority of those interested in LMI statistics and generating custom charts should use the interactive LMI Analysis Tool at https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/lmi-tool. This underlying LMI dataset is intended for users with experience working with survey data files and producing weighted survey estimates using statistical software packages (such as SAS, SPSS, or Stata).
Facebook
TwitterThe National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure (ENIGH) aims to provide a statistical overview of the behavior of household income and expenditure in terms of its amount, origin and distribution. In addition, it offers information on the occupational and sociodemographic characteristics of the members of the household, as well as the characteristics of the housing infrastructure and household equipment.
The ENIGH is part of the Information System of National Interest (IIN), which means that the results obtained from this project are mandatory for the Federation, the states and the municipalities, in order to contribute to national development.
In 1984, a trend began to broaden the objectives and homogenize the methodology, taking into account international recommendations and the information requirements of the different users, taking care of historical comparability.
Periodicity: Since 1992 it has been carried out biennially (every two years) with the exception of 2005 when an extraordinary survey was carried out.
Target population: It is made up of the households of nationals or foreigners, who usually reside in private homes within the national territory.
Selection Unit: Private home. The dwellings are chosen through a meticulous statistical process that guarantees that the results obtained from only a part of the population (sample) can be generalized to the total.
Sampling Frame: INEGI's multi-purpose framework is made up of demographic and cartographic information obtained from the 2010 Population and Housing Census.
Observation unit: The home.
Unit of analysis: The household, the dwelling and the members of the household.
Thematic coverage:
Characteristics of the house. Residents and identification of households in the dwelling. Sociodemographic characteristics of the residents of the dwelling. Home equipment, services. Activity condition and occupational characteristics of household members aged 12 and over. Total current income (monetary and non-monetary) of households. Financial and capital perceptions of households and their members. Current monetary expenditure of households. Financial and capital expenditures of households.
The different concepts of the ENIGH are governed by recommendations agreed upon in international conventions, for example:
The resolutions and reports of the 18 International Conferences on Labour Statistics, of the International Labour Organization (ILO).
The final report and recommendations of the Canberra Group, an expert group on "Household Income Statistics".
Manual of Household Surveys. Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, Bureau of Statistics. United Nations, New York, 1987.
They are also articulated with the CNational Accounts and with the Household Surveys carried out by the INEGI.
Sample size: At the national level, including the ten-one, there are 93,186 private homes.
Survey period: The collection of information will take place between August 11 and November 18 of this year. Throughout this period, ten cuts are made, each organized in ten days; Therefore, each of these cuts will be known as tens (see calendar in the annex).
Workload: According to the meticulousness in the recording of information in this project, a load of six interviews in private homes per dozen has been defined for each interviewer. The number of interviews may decrease or increase according to several factors: non-response, recovery from non-response, or additional households.
National and at the state level - Urban: localities with 2,500 or more inhabitants - Rural: localities with less than 2,500 inhabitants
The household, the dwelling and the members of the household.
The survey is aimed at households in the national territory.
Probabilistic household survey
The design of the exhibition for ENIGH-2018 is characterized by being probabilistic; consequently, the results obtained from the survey are generalized to the entire population of the study domain; in turn, it is two-stage, stratified and by clusters, where the ultimate unit of selection is the dwelling and the unit of observation is the household.
The ENIGH-2018 subsample was selected from the 2012 INEGI master sample, this master sample was designed and selected from the 2012 Master Sampling Framework (Marco Maestro de Muestreo (MMM)) which was made up of housing clusters called Primary Sampling Units (PSU), built from the cartographic and demographic information obtained from the 2010 Population and Housing Census. The master sample allows the selection of subsamples for all housing surveys carried out by INEGI; Its design is probabilistic, stratified, single-stage and by clusters, since it is in them that the dwellings that make up the subsamples of the different surveys were selected in a second stage. The design of the MMM was built as follows:
Formation of the primary sampling units (PSU)
First, the set of PSUs that will cover the national territory is built.
The primary sampling units are made up of groups of dwellings with differentiated characteristics depending on the area to which they belong, as specified below:
a) In high urban areas
The minimum size of a PSU is 80 inhabited dwellings and the maximum is 160. They can be made up of:
• A block. • The union of two or more contiguous blocks of the same AGEB. • The union of two or more contiguous blocks of different AGEBs in the same locality. • The union of two or more contiguous blocks from different localities, which belong to the same size of locality.
b) In urban complement: The minimum size of a PSU is 160 inhabited dwellings and the maximum is 300. They can be made up of:
• A block. • The union of two or more contiguous blocks of the same AGEB. • The union of two or more contiguous blocks of different AGEBs in the same locality. • The union of two or more contiguous blocks from different AGEBs and localities, but from the same municipality.
c) In rural areas: The minimum size of a PSU is 160 inhabited dwellings and the maximum is 300. They can be made up of:
• An AGEB. • Part of an AGEB. • The union of two or more adjoining AGEBs in the same municipality. • The union of an AGEB with a part of another adjoining AGEB in the same municipality.
The total number of PSUs formed was 240,912.
Stratification
Once the set of PSUs has been constructed, those with similar characteristics are grouped, that is, they are stratified.
The political division of the country and the formation of localities differentiated by their size, naturally form a geographical stratification.
In each federal entity there are three areas, divided into zones.
High urban, Zone 01 to 09, Cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants.
Urban complement, Zone 25, 35, 45 and 55, From 50,000 to 99,999 inhabitants, 15,000 to 49,999 inhabitants, 5,000 to 14,999 inhabitants, 2,500 to 4,999 inhabitants.
Rural, Zone 60, Localities with less than 2,500 inhabitants.
At the same time, four sociodemographic strata were formed in which all the PSUs in the country were grouped, this stratification considers the sociodemographic characteristics of the inhabitants of the dwellings, as well as the physical characteristics and equipment of the same, expressed through 34 indicators built with information from the 2010 Population and Housing Census*, for which multivariate statistical methods were used.
In this way, each PSU was classified into a single geographical and a sociodemographic stratum.
As a result, there are a total of 683 strata throughout the country.
Selection of the PSUs of the master sample The PSUs of the master sample were selected by means of a sampling with probability proportional to the size.
Sample size For the calculation of the sample size of the ENIGH-2018, the average total current income per household was considered as a reference variable.
As a result of the sum of the 87,826 homes selected and 1,312 additional homes that were found in those homes, the total amounted to 89,138 households.
Face-to-face [f2f]
Six collection instruments will be used to collect information in each household, four of which concentrate information on the household as a whole.
These are:
In the other three, individual information is recorded for people:
Capture activities
The capture consisted of transferring the information from the questionnaires that were fully answered to electronic means through IKTAN, in accordance with the procedures established for the capture process of the ENIGH 2018.
The Person in Charge of Capture and Validation, together with his work team, began the capture of the questionnaires collected by each Interviewer, organized by packages of questionnaires of each page with the result of a complete interview, following the established order:
• Household and housing questionnaire. • Questionnaires for people under 12 years of age. • Questionnaires for people aged 12 and over. • Questionnaires for home businesses. • Household expenditure questionnaire. • Daily expenses booklet.
In addition, the IKTAN made it possible to record and know the progress or conclusion of workloads.
Validation activities
In parallel to the capture, the state coordination
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents the median household income across different racial categories in Prairie Home. It portrays the median household income of the head of household across racial categories (excluding ethnicity) as identified by the Census Bureau. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into economic disparities and trends and explore the variations in median houshold income for diverse racial categories.
Key observations
Based on our analysis of the distribution of Prairie Home population by race & ethnicity, the population is predominantly White. This particular racial category constitutes the majority, accounting for 92.99% of the total residents in Prairie Home. Notably, the median household income for White households is $44,792. Interestingly, despite the White population being the most populous, it is worth noting that Two or More Races households actually reports the highest median household income, with a median income of $64,107. This reveals that, while Whites may be the most numerous in Prairie Home, Two or More Races households experience greater economic prosperity in terms of median household income.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.
Racial categories include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Prairie Home median household income by race. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterFrequency: OccasionalTable: 46-10-0038-01Release date: 2022-04-12Geography: Province or territory, Census subdivision, Census metropolitan area, Census agglomeration, Census metropolitan area part, Census agglomeration partSymbol legend:.. / not available for a specific reference periodx / suppressed to meet the confidentiality requirements of the Statistics Act A / data quality: excellentThe footnotes in the table are represented in brackets.1) The universe of this table is restricted to individual resident owners who occupy a residential property. An owner's geographic location is determined by the location of the occupied property for both single- and multiple-property owners. A residential property refers to all land and structures intended for private occupancy whether on a permanent or a temporary basis.2) The geographic boundaries used in this table are the 2016 census subdivisions boundaries.3) Previous reference period estimates are subject to revision.4) The Composite Quality Indicator (CQI) shown in this table is created by combining many individual quality indicators, each one representing the quality of different Canadian Housing Statistics Program (CHSP) data processing steps (for example: coding, geocoding, linkage and imputation) and includes the following values: A - Excellent: All domain variables and the variable of interest are of excellent quality. B - Very good: All domain variables and the variable of interest are of very good to excellent quality. C - Good: The quality of some of the domain variables or the variable of interest is considered good while all the other variables are of very good to excellent quality. D - Acceptable: The quality of some of the domain variables or the variable of interest is considered acceptable while all the other variables are of good to excellent quality. E - Use with caution: Several domain variables or the variable of interest are of poor quality. F - Too unreliable to be published. The CQIs are available starting with the reference period of 2020, except for the Northwest Territories where they are available from 2019 reference period.5) Property type" refers to property characteristics and/or dwelling configuration on which there can be one or more residential structures. Property types include single-detached houses semi-detached houses condominium apartments mobile homes other property types properties with multiple residential units and vacant land."6) Estimates by property type in Newfoundland and Labrador are only available in the census subdivision of St. John’s.7) Estimates by property type in Northwest Territories are not available.8) Estimates by property type in Nunavut are not available.9) The number of properties owned by the property owner is limited to residential properties that are within a given province.10) Newfoundland and Labrador estimates are not available at the provincial level and for the category “Outside of census metropolitan areas (CMAs) and census agglomerations (CAs)”.11) Northwest Territories estimates are only available in the census agglomeration of Yellowknife.12) Counts undergo random rounding, a process that transforms all raw counts into randomly rounded counts. This reduces the possibility of identifying individuals in the tabulations. All percentages are derived from rounded counts, subtotals and totals may not exactly equal the sum of components due to system rounding.13) The number of property owners estimates are not available for the 2018 reference period.14) The number of owners should be used with caution outside of census metropolitan areas (CMAs) and census agglomerations (CAs), as well as the proportion of owners by geography. This note does not apply to Nunavut.15) Assessment value" refers to the assessed value of the property for the purposes of determining property taxes. It is important to note that the assessed value does not necessarily represent the market value. Given that different provinces and territories have their own assessment periods and duration of the valuation roll it is difficult to make accurate comparisons of similar properties from one province or territory to another. For properties that are being utilized for both residential and non-residential purposes only the residential portion's value has been taken into account. The reference years of the assessment values by province or territory are available here: Canadian Housing Statistics Program (CHSP)."16) For Nunavut, the property use indicator is not available, the universe of this table includes all individual resident owners. For owners with multiple properties, the geographic location and type of property are from the residential property with the highest assessment value.17) Averages and medians are calculated using values greater than zero for the variables of interest.18) Total assessment value" represents the sum of the assessment values of all residential properties owned by an owner within a given province."19) Total income of person" refers to the total income of an individual before deductions for income taxes during the previous year. This income measure is the sum of market income and government transfers. Market income includes employment income, investment income, private retirement income and other income from market sources during the previous year. Government transfers refer to all cash benefits received from federal, provincial, territorial or municipal governments during the previous year."Cite: Statistics Canada. Table 46-10-0038-01 Single and multiple residential property owners: demographic data and value of properties ownedhttps://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=4610003801
Facebook
TwitterComprehensive demographic dataset for Beverly Hills, CA, US including population statistics, household income, housing units, education levels, employment data, and transportation with year-over-year changes.
Facebook
TwitterProduct contains one data file (.csv format) for each year from 2006-2022. Records provide information about family demographics, dwelling characteristics, home value, income, years in residence & detailed geographic identifiers. Note: These data files are large (9-14GB each) and cannot be delivered through the Borealis platform. Please contact the Map and Data Library to arrange access: https://mdl.library.utoronto.ca/about/contact-form.