In 2023, about **** percent of the estimated number of homeless individuals in the United States were male, compared to ** percent who were female.

In 2023, there were about ******* homeless people estimated to be living in the United States, the highest number of homeless people recorded within the provided time period. In comparison, the second-highest number of homeless people living in the U.S. within this time period was in 2007, at *******. How is homelessness calculated? Calculating homelessness is complicated for several different reasons. For one, it is challenging to determine how many people are homeless as there is no direct definition for homelessness. Additionally, it is difficult to try and find every single homeless person that exists. Sometimes they cannot be reached, leaving people unaccounted for. In the United States, the Department of Housing and Urban Development calculates the homeless population by counting the number of people on the streets and the number of people in homeless shelters on one night each year. According to this count, Los Angeles City and New York City are the cities with the most homeless people in the United States. Homelessness in the United States Between 2022 and 2023, New Hampshire saw the highest increase in the number of homeless people. However, California was the state with the highest number of homeless people, followed by New York and Florida. The vast amount of homelessness in California is a result of multiple factors, one of them being the extreme high cost of living, as well as opposition to mandatory mental health counseling and drug addiction. However, the District of Columbia had the highest estimated rate of homelessness per 10,000 people in 2023. This was followed by New York, Vermont, and Oregon.

In 2023, there were an estimated ******* white homeless people in the United States, the most out of any ethnicity. In comparison, there were around ******* Black or African American homeless people in the U.S. How homelessness is counted The actual number of homeless individuals in the U.S. is difficult to measure. The Department of Housing and Urban Development uses point-in-time estimates, where employees and volunteers count both sheltered and unsheltered homeless people during the last 10 days of January. However, it is very likely that the actual number of homeless individuals is much higher than the estimates, which makes it difficult to say just how many homeless there are in the United States. Unsheltered homeless in the United States California is well-known in the U.S. for having a high homeless population, and Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego all have high proportions of unsheltered homeless people. While in many states, the Department of Housing and Urban Development says that there are more sheltered homeless people than unsheltered, this estimate is most likely in relation to the method of estimation.

When analyzing the ratio of homelessness to state population, New York, Vermont, and Oregon had the highest rates in 2023. However, Washington, D.C. had an estimated ** homeless individuals per 10,000 people, which was significantly higher than any of the 50 states. Homeless people by race The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development performs homeless counts at the end of January each year, which includes people in both sheltered and unsheltered locations. The estimated number of homeless people increased to ******* in 2023 – the highest level since 2007. However, the true figure is likely to be much higher, as some individuals prefer to stay with family or friends - making it challenging to count the actual number of homeless people living in the country. In 2023, nearly half of the people experiencing homelessness were white, while the number of Black homeless people exceeded *******. How many veterans are homeless in America? The  number of homeless veterans in the United States has halved since 2010. The state of California, which is currently suffering a homeless crisis, accounted for the highest number of homeless veterans in 2022. There are many causes of homelessness among veterans of the U.S. military, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance abuse problems, and a lack of affordable housing.

The graph displays the top 15 states by an estimated number of homeless people in the United States for the year 2025. The x-axis represents U.S. states, while the y-axis shows the number of homeless individuals in each state. California has the highest homeless population with 187,084 individuals, followed by New York with 158,019, while Hawaii places last in this dataset with 11,637. This bar graph highlights significant differences across states, with some states like California and New York showing notably higher counts compared to others, indicating regional disparities in homelessness levels across the country.

Transitional Housing Services Market size was valued at USD 100 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 342.6 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 15.2% during the forecast period 2024-2031.

Global Transitional Housing Services Market Drivers

The market drivers for the Transitional Housing Services Market can be influenced by various factors. These may include:

Increasing Homelessness Rates: The rising rates of homelessness globally are a significant market driver for transitional housing services. Factors such as economic instability, lack of affordable housing, and social issues contribute to this increasing trend. Many cities report surges in homelessness, prompting governments and NGOs to seek robust solutions. Transitional housing serves as an intermediary step, offering individuals and families temporary support while they work towards permanent housing solutions.

The number of people left homeless due to wildfires in 2023 amounted to **, a considerable decrease when compared to the figures of 2022 and 2021, when ***** and ***** people lost their homes due to such disasters.

This layer contains detailed Point in Time counts of homeless populations from 2018, 2013, and 2008. A 2019 version is now available!Layer is symbolized to show the count of the overall homeless population in 2018, with overall counts from 2008 and 2013 in the pop-up, as well as a pie chart of breakdown of type of shelter. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. The Point-in-Time (PIT) count is a count of sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons on a single night in January. HUD requires that Continuums of Care Areas (CoCs) conduct an annual count of homeless persons who are sheltered in emergency shelter, transitional housing, and Safe Havens on a single night. CoCs also must conduct a count of unsheltered homeless persons every other year (odd numbered years). Each count is planned, coordinated, and carried out locally.The Point-in-Time values were retrieved from HUD's Historical Data site. The 2018, 2013, and 2008 sheets within the "2007 - 2018 PIT Counts within CoCs.xlsx" (downloaded on 2/7/2019) file were combined and joined to the CoC boundaries available from HUD's Open Data site. As noted in the "Mergers" sheet in the PIT Excel file, some CoC Areas have merged over the years. Use caution when comparing numbers in these CoCs across years. Data note: MO-604 covers territory in both Missouri and Kansas. The record described in this file represents the CoC's total territory, the sum of the point-in-time estimates the CoC separately reported for the portions of its territory in MO and in KS.For more information and attributes on the CoC Areas themselves, including contact information, see this accompanying layer.Suggested Citation: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)'s Point in Time (PIT) counts for Continuum of Care Grantee Areas, accessed via ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World on (date).

The global market for Community Food, Housing, and Relief Services is a significant and rapidly growing sector, driven by increasing income inequality, natural disasters, and global conflicts. While precise market sizing data is unavailable, considering the substantial involvement of numerous large NGOs (like Feeding America, World Food Programme, and others) alongside regional and local organizations, a reasonable estimation places the 2025 market value at approximately $500 billion USD. This represents a substantial increase from previous years, reflecting the growing need for these services worldwide. The Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) is difficult to pinpoint precisely without detailed financial data from all participating organizations. However, considering factors like population growth, increasing poverty levels in many regions, and the escalating frequency and severity of climate-related disasters, a conservative estimate would place the CAGR for the forecast period (2025-2033) at around 5-7%. This growth is further fueled by evolving societal attitudes towards social responsibility and corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, which increasingly include support for community relief efforts. Key market segments include emergency relief, long-term housing assistance, food security programs, and support services for vulnerable populations (children, the elderly, disabled individuals). While numerous organizations contribute, the market is characterized by a diverse range of players, from large international NGOs to smaller, local charities. Challenges facing the sector include securing sustainable funding, coordinating resources effectively across various organizations, and ensuring equitable access to services for all those in need. Future growth will depend on addressing these challenges, promoting greater collaboration among stakeholders, and leveraging technological advancements to improve efficiency and outreach. Effective advocacy and public awareness campaigns are also critical to ensuring sustained support for these vital services.

BackgroundSubstance use contributes to poor health and increases the risk of mortality in the homeless population. This study assessed the prevalence and risk levels of substance use and associated factors among adults experiencing homelessness in Accra, Ghana.Methods305 adults currently experiencing sheltered and unsheltered homelessness in Accra aged ≥ 18 years were recruited. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) was used to assess substance use risk levels. Association of high-risk substance use with sociodemographic, migration, homelessness, and health characteristics were assessed using logistic regression.ResultsNearly three-quarters (71%, n = 216) of the sample had ever used a substance, almost all of whom engaged in ASSIST-defined moderate-risk (55%) or high-risk (40%) use. Survivors of physical or emotional violence (AOR = 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.89–6.65, p

Study criteria (Population, Concept, Context and Evidence sources).

This round of Eurobarometer surveys diverged from the Standard Eurobarometer measures and queried respondents on the following major areas of focus: (1) poverty and social exclusion, (2) social services, (3) climate change, and (4) the national economic situation and statistics. For the first major focus, poverty and social exclusion, respondents were queried about their own definition of poverty, the extent of poverty in their area, trends in the growth or decline of poverty in their area and in the world, social and personal causes of poverty and homelessness, and negative effects of poverty. Questions also included the risk of poverty for themselves and others, the importance of governmental wealth redistribution, social tension between groups, trust in individual people, trust in and reliability of institutions in fighting poverty, minimal acceptable living standards, and the level of homelessness in their area. In addition, respondents were queried on their ability to keep their job, the relationship between their job and their family, their own personal aid to help the poor, access to financial services, the respondents' satisfaction with life, and the respondents' own living conditions and income. For the second major focus, social services, respondents were asked about such services as long term care, childcare, public employment, social housing, and social assistance. Questions focused on how much they or others around them use social services, the quality and affordability of social services, preferences for elderly care and childcare, the prioritization of group assistance, and the financing of social services. For the third major focus, climate change, respondents were asked about the seriousness of climate change, governmental attempts to fight climate change, personal actions taken to fight climate change, and the relationship between environmental protection and economic growth. Finally, for the fourth major focus, the national economic situation and statistics, respondents were asked to estimate their country's official growth rate, inflation rate, and unemployment rate, and were asked to give their opinions on the importance and trustworthiness of economic statistics. Respondents were also queried on the employment and economic situations in their country. Demographic and other background information includes left-right political placement, occupation, age, gender, marital status, age at completion of full-time education, household composition, ownership of a fixed or a mobile telephone and other durable goods, internet usage, financial situation, level in society, minority group affiliation, region of residence, type and size of locality, and language of interview (in select countries).

Abstract

IPUMS-International is an effort to inventory, preserve, harmonize, and disseminate census microdata from around the world. The project has collected the world's largest archive of publicly available census samples. The data are coded and documented consistently across countries and over time to facillitate comparative research. IPUMS-International makes these data available to qualified researchers free of charge through a web dissemination system.

The IPUMS project is a collaboration of the Minnesota Population Center, National Statistical Offices, and international data archives. Major funding is provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Demographic and Behavioral Sciences Branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Additional support is provided by the University of Minnesota Office of the Vice President for Research, the Minnesota Population Center, and Sun Microsystems.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

Household

UNITS IDENTIFIED: - Dwellings: No - Vacant units: No - Households: Yes - Individuals: Yes - Group quarters: Yes - Special populations: Homeless; nomads

UNIT DESCRIPTIONS: - Households: A standard household is a person or a group of people related or not, living in the same housing unit, often taking their meals together and working together on the other essential needs. This group generally recognizes the authority of one person who is called the Head of Household. - Group quarters: This is a group of people, who for non-family reasons which are mainly related to profession, health, school, denomination, or detention, live together in a specialized establishment or institution like a workers camp, military barracks, dormitories, a hospital with rooms, a convent, an orphanage, a prison.

Universe

All persons present in Cameroon at the time of the census, including visitors from other countries.

Kind of data

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure

MICRODATA SOURCE: Central Bureau of Census and Population Studies

SAMPLE DESIGN: Systematic sample of every 10th dwelling with a random start, drawn by MPC

SAMPLE FRACTION: 10%

SAMPLE UNIVERSE: Systematic sample of every 10th dwelling with a random start, drawn by MPC

SAMPLE SIZE (person records): 1,772,359

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Four forms: Standard household questionnaire, communal household questionnaire, nomad questionnaire, and homeless questionnaire

Response rate

UNDERCOUNT: No available estimate

Summary of key findings and future recommendations from included studies.

Abstract

IPUMS-International is an effort to inventory, preserve, harmonize, and disseminate census microdata from around the world. The project has collected the world's largest archive of publicly available census samples. The data are coded and documented consistently across countries and over time to facillitate comparative research. IPUMS-International makes these data available to qualified researchers free of charge through a web dissemination system.

The IPUMS project is a collaboration of the Minnesota Population Center, National Statistical Offices, and international data archives. Major funding is provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Demographic and Behavioral Sciences Branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Additional support is provided by the University of Minnesota Office of the Vice President for Research, the Minnesota Population Center, and Sun Microsystems.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

Household

UNITS IDENTIFIED: - Dwellings: No - Vacant units: No - Households: Yes - Individuals: Yes - Group quarters: Yes (institutional) - Special populations: Homeless, boat people

UNIT DESCRIPTIONS: - Dwellings: Not available - Households: An individual or group of people who inhabit part or all of the physical or census building and usually live together and eat together from one kitchen. One kitchen means that the daily needs are managed and combined into one. - Group quarters: An institutional household includes people living in a dormitory, barracks, or insitution where everyday needs are managed by an institution or foundation. Also includes groups of 10 or more people in lodging houses or buildings.

Universe

All population, Indonesian and foreign, residing in the territorial area of Indonesia, regardless of residence status. Includes homeless, refugees, ship crews, and people in inaccessible areas. Diplomats and their families residing in Indonesia were excluded.

Kind of data

Census/enumeration data [cen]

Sampling procedure

MICRODATA SOURCE: Statistics Indonesia

SAMPLE DESIGN: Geographically stratified systematic sample (drawn by MPC).

SAMPLE UNIT: Household

SAMPLE FRACTION: 10%

SAMPLE SIZE (person records): 22,928,795

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Three questionnaires: C1 to enumerate regular households living in areas covered in the census mappling; C2 for the population living in areas not included in the mapping, such as remote areas; and L2 for the homeless, boat people, and tribes.

Example search string from PsychoInfo and Medline databases on the OVID platform.

This map shows the percent of population who are veterans. This pattern is shown by states, counties, and tracts. The data is from the most current American Community Survey (ACS) data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Veterans are men and women who have served (even for a short time), but are not currently serving, on active duty in the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or the Coast Guard, or who served in the U.S. Merchant Marine during World War II. People who served in the National Guard or Reserves are classified as veterans only if they were ever called or ordered to active duty.The pop-up highlights the breakdown of veterans by gender.Zoom to any area in the country to see a local or regional pattern, or use one of the bookmarks to see distinct patterns of poverty through the US. Data is available for the 50 states plus Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico.The data comes from this ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World layer, which is part of a wider collection of layers that contain the most up-to-date ACS data from the Census. The layers are updated annually when the ACS releases their most current 5-year estimates. Visit the layer for more information about the data source, vintage, and download date for the data.

The Mexican residential real estate market, valued at $14.51 billion in 2025, exhibits a promising growth trajectory with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 4.14% projected from 2025 to 2033. This robust expansion is fueled by several key drivers. A growing middle class with increasing disposable income is a significant factor, alongside government initiatives promoting affordable housing and infrastructure development. Urbanization continues to drive demand, particularly in major metropolitan areas like Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey. Furthermore, the tourism sector's influence on secondary housing markets in coastal and resort regions contributes significantly to the overall market dynamism. However, challenges exist; fluctuations in the Mexican Peso against the US dollar can affect investment sentiment, and interest rate changes impact mortgage accessibility. Regulatory hurdles and bureaucratic processes related to land ownership and construction permits sometimes impede development. The market is segmented by property type, with apartments and condominiums likely holding the largest share, followed by landed houses and villas, reflecting diverse consumer preferences and housing needs. Competition is intense, with a mix of both large national developers like Grupo Lar and Grupo Sordo Madaleno, alongside smaller regional players vying for market share. The market's future success depends on navigating these challenges effectively while capitalizing on the underlying growth opportunities. The projected market expansion will likely see a more pronounced increase in higher-value segments (landed houses and villas) as rising incomes fuel demand for luxury properties. Geographical variations are expected; while urban centers will experience sustained growth, resort areas might see more volatile fluctuations influenced by tourism trends. The market's resilience will be tested by its ability to adapt to potential economic shifts and effectively address regulatory constraints. Continuous investment in infrastructure and supportive government policies will be pivotal in fostering sustainable and inclusive growth across all market segments within the forecast period. The presence of both large and small players ensures a competitive landscape, promoting innovation and diversification within the industry. Recent developments include: June 2023: Habi, a prominent real estate technology platform, is set to receive a substantial financial boost of USD 15 million from IDB Invest. This funding, spread over four years, aims to fuel Habi's expansion plans in Mexico. While the structured loan has the potential to reach USD 50 million, its primary focus is to cater to Habi's working capital needs. IDB Invest's strategic move is not just about bolstering Habi's growth; it also aims to leverage technology to enhance liquidity and agility in Mexico's secondary real estate markets. By addressing the housing gap in Mexico, this funding initiative is poised to elevate market efficiency, bolster transparency, encourage local contractors for home renovations, and expand Habi's corridor network., June 2023: Celaya Tequila, a premium tequila brand crafted in small batches and co-founded by brothers Matt & Ryan Kalil, is forging a philanthropic alliance with New Story, a non-profit dedicated to eradicating global homelessness. In a groundbreaking move, Celaya Tequila pledges to contribute a percentage of sales from every bottle towards an affordable housing endeavor in Jalisco, Mexico. This endeavor aims to empower underprivileged families in Jalisco by enhancing their access to homes and land ownership.. Key drivers for this market are: 4., Increasing Residential Real Estate Demand by Young People4.; Increase in Average Housing Price in Mexico. Potential restraints include: 4., Increasing Residential Real Estate Demand by Young People4.; Increase in Average Housing Price in Mexico. Notable trends are: Demand for Residential Real Estate Witnessing Notable Surge, Primarily Driven by Young Homebuyers.

BackgroundHomelessness staff often experience high job demands, limited resources, and significant emotional strains; with high levels of burnout, stress, and trauma being common within the workforce. Despite growing recognition of these issues, limited literature exists on interventions to address them. This study aims to conduct a systematic scoping review to map and identify interventions aimed at improving well-being and reducing burnout among homelessness staff.MethodsAll eligible studies needed to include an intervention addressing burnout and/or well-being in homelessness staff, published in English with primary data. Evidence sources were left open with no data restrictions. Following protocol registration, a systematic search of five electronic databases (Medline, APA PsychInfo, Global Health, ASSIA, CINAHL) and Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were double-screened for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.ResultsOf the 5,775 screened studies, six met the inclusion criteria: two peer-reviewed and four non-peer-reviewed publications. No studies were retrieved from Google Scholar. The included studies comprised four quantitative non-randomised designs, one randomised controlled trial, and one mixed-methods study. All included studies were complex interventions. Three were therapy-based, two included supervision, and two were one-time educational sessions. Most were conducted in the United States (n = 4), with two in the United Kingdom. The total pooled sample was 347 participants, though four studies were missing demographic data (age and gender). The studies used heterogenous measures and outcomes. Limitations included restrictions to English-only publications, potential gaps in capturing well-being measures, and a limited grey literature scope.ConclusionThere is a lack of research on well-being and burnout interventions in frontline homelessness staff. Identified studies were generally low quality, using heterogenous measures and outcomes to assess well-being and burnout, limiting the generalisability of findings. Future research should employ more robust study designs with standardised measures and outcomes.

The Covid-19 disease is resurging across the United States and vaccine hesitancy remains a major obstacle to reaching the expected threshold for herd immunity. Using the nationally representative cross sectional Household Pulse Survey (HPS) Data published by the U.S. Census Bureau, this study identified demographic, socio-economic, and medical-psychological determinants of Covid-19 vaccination. Results revealed significant differences in Covid-19 vaccine uptake due to age, sex, sexual orientation, race or ethnicity, marital status, education, income, employment form, housing and living condition, physical illness, mental illness, Covid-19 illness, distrust of vaccines and beliefs about the efficacy of vaccines. Government policymakers need to be cognizant of these determinants of vaccine hesitancy when formulating policies to increase vaccine uptake and control the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings of this study suggest that segmented solutions to reach vulnerable groups like racial minorities and homeless people are needed to win the trust and optimize vaccine uptake.