Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the Hart's Location town population by age cohorts (Children: Under 18 years; Working population: 18-64 years; Senior population: 65 years or more). It lists the population in each age cohort group along with its percentage relative to the total population of Hart's Location town. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution across children, working population and senior population for dependency ratio, housing requirements, ageing, migration patterns etc.
Key observations
The largest age group was 65 years and over with a poulation of 25 (51.02% of the total population). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.
Age cohorts:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Hart's Location town Population by Age. You can refer the same here
Welcome to Apiscrapy, your ultimate destination for comprehensive location-based intelligence. As an AI-driven web scraping and automation platform, Apiscrapy excels in converting raw web data into polished, ready-to-use data APIs. With a unique capability to collect Google Address Data, Google Address API, Google Location API, Google Map, and Google Location Data with 100% accuracy, we redefine possibilities in location intelligence.
Key Features:
Unparalleled Data Variety: Apiscrapy offers a diverse range of address-related datasets, including Google Address Data and Google Location Data. Whether you seek B2B address data or detailed insights for various industries, we cover it all.
Integration with Google Address API: Seamlessly integrate our datasets with the powerful Google Address API. This collaboration ensures not just accessibility but a robust combination that amplifies the precision of your location-based insights.
Business Location Precision: Experience a new level of precision in business decision-making with our address data. Apiscrapy delivers accurate and up-to-date business locations, enhancing your strategic planning and expansion efforts.
Tailored B2B Marketing: Customize your B2B marketing strategies with precision using our detailed B2B address data. Target specific geographic areas, refine your approach, and maximize the impact of your marketing efforts.
Use Cases:
Location-Based Services: Companies use Google Address Data to provide location-based services such as navigation, local search, and location-aware advertisements.
Logistics and Transportation: Logistics companies utilize Google Address Data for route optimization, fleet management, and delivery tracking.
E-commerce: Online retailers integrate address autocomplete features powered by Google Address Data to simplify the checkout process and ensure accurate delivery addresses.
Real Estate: Real estate agents and property websites leverage Google Address Data to provide accurate property listings, neighborhood information, and proximity to amenities.
Urban Planning and Development: City planners and developers utilize Google Address Data to analyze population density, traffic patterns, and infrastructure needs for urban planning and development projects.
Market Analysis: Businesses use Google Address Data for market analysis, including identifying target demographics, analyzing competitor locations, and selecting optimal locations for new stores or offices.
Geographic Information Systems (GIS): GIS professionals use Google Address Data as a foundational layer for mapping and spatial analysis in fields such as environmental science, public health, and natural resource management.
Government Services: Government agencies utilize Google Address Data for census enumeration, voter registration, tax assessment, and planning public infrastructure projects.
Tourism and Hospitality: Travel agencies, hotels, and tourism websites incorporate Google Address Data to provide location-based recommendations, itinerary planning, and booking services for travelers.
Discover the difference with Apiscrapy – where accuracy meets diversity in address-related datasets, including Google Address Data, Google Address API, Google Location API, and more. Redefine your approach to location intelligence and make data-driven decisions with confidence. Revolutionize your business strategies today!
This layer shows the age statistics in Tucson by neighborhood, aggregated from block level data, between 2010-2019. For questions, contact GIS_IT@tucsonaz.gov. The data shown is from Esri's 2019 Updated Demographic estimates.Esri's U.S. Updated Demographic (2019/2024) Data - Population, age, income, sex, race, home value, and marital status are among the variables included in the database. Each year, Esri's Data Development team employs its proven methodologies to update more than 2,000 demographic variables for a variety of U.S. geographies.Additional Esri Resources:Esri DemographicsU.S. 2019/2024 Esri Updated DemographicsEssential demographic vocabularyPermitted use of this data is covered in the DATA section of the Esri Master Agreement (E204CW) and these supplemental terms.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
All cities with a population > 1000 or seats of adm div (ca 80.000)Sources and ContributionsSources : GeoNames is aggregating over hundred different data sources. Ambassadors : GeoNames Ambassadors help in many countries. Wiki : A wiki allows to view the data and quickly fix error and add missing places. Donations and Sponsoring : Costs for running GeoNames are covered by donations and sponsoring.Enrichment:add country name
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domainhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain
This dataset contains information about the demographics of all US cities and census-designated places with a population greater or equal to 65,000. This data comes from the US Census Bureau's 2015 American Community Survey. This product uses the Census Bureau Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the Census Bureau.
https://www.spotzi.com/en/about/terms-of-service/https://www.spotzi.com/en/about/terms-of-service/
Our Population Density Grid Dataset for South America offers detailed, grid-based insights into the distribution of population across cities, towns, and rural areas. Free to explore and visualize, this dataset provides an invaluable resource for businesses and researchers looking to understand demographic patterns and optimize their location-based strategies.
By creating an account, you gain access to advanced tools for leveraging this data in geomarketing applications. Perfect for OOH advertising, retail planning, and more, our platform allows you to integrate population insights with your business intelligence, enabling you to make data-driven decisions for your marketing and expansion strategies.
Population is the sum of births plus in-migration, and it signifies the total market size possible in the area. This is an important metric for economic developers to measure their economic health and investment attraction. Businesses also use this as a metric for market size when evaluating startup, expansion or relocation decisions.
The 2002 Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey (VNDHS 2002) is a nationally representative sample survey of 5,665 ever-married women age 15-49 selected from 205 sample points (clusters) throughout Vietnam. It provides information on levels of fertility, family planning knowledge and use, infant and child mortality, and indicators of maternal and child health. The survey included a Community/ Health Facility Questionnaire that was implemented in each of the sample clusters.
The survey was designed to measure change in reproductive health indicators over the five years since the VNDHS 1997, especially in the 18 provinces that were targeted in the Population and Family Health Project of the Committee for Population, Family and Children. Consequently, all provinces were separated into “project” and “nonproject” groups to permit separate estimates for each. Data collection for the survey took place from 1 October to 21 December 2002.
The Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey 2002 (VNDHS 2002) was the third DHS in Vietnam, with prior surveys implemented in 1988 and 1997. The VNDHS 2002 was carried out in the framework of the activities of the Population and Family Health Project of the Committee for Population, Family and Children (previously the National Committee for Population and Family Planning).
The main objectives of the VNDHS 2002 were to collect up-to-date information on family planning, childhood mortality, and health issues such as breastfeeding practices, pregnancy care, vaccination of children, treatment of common childhood illnesses, and HIV/AIDS, as well as utilization of health and family planning services. The primary objectives of the survey were to estimate changes in family planning use in comparison with the results of the VNDHS 1997, especially on issues in the scope of the project of the Committee for Population, Family and Children.
VNDHS 2002 data confirm the pattern of rapidly declining fertility that was observed in the VNDHS 1997. It also shows a sharp decline in child mortality, as well as a modest increase in contraceptive use. Differences between project and non-project provinces are generally small.
The 2002 Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey (VNDHS 2002) is a nationally representative sample survey. The VNDHS 1997 was designed to provide separate estimates for the whole country, urban and rural areas, for 18 project provinces and the remaining nonproject provinces as well. Project provinces refer to 18 focus provinces targeted for the strengthening of their primary health care systems by the Government's Population and Family Health Project to be implemented over a period of seven years, from 1996 to 2002 (At the outset of this project there were 15 focus provinces, which became 18 by the creation of 3 new provinces from the initial set of 15). These provinces were selected according to criteria based on relatively low health and family planning status, no substantial family planning donor presence, and regional spread. These criteria resulted in the selection of the country's poorer provinces. Nine of these provinces have significant proportions of ethnic minorities among their population.
The population covered by the 2002 VNDHS is defined as the universe of all women age 15-49 in Vietnam.
Sample survey data
The sample for the VNDHS 2002 was based on that used in the VNDHS 1997, which in turn was a subsample of the 1996 Multi-Round Demographic Survey (MRS), a semi-annual survey of about 243,000 households undertaken regularly by GSO. The MRS sample consisted of 1,590 sample areas known as enumeration areas (EAs) spread throughout the 53 provinces/cities of Vietnam, with 30 EAs in each province. On average, an EA comprises about 150 households. For the VNDHS 1997, a subsample of 205 EAs was selected, with 26 households in each urban EA and 39 households for each rural EA. A total of 7,150 households was selected for the survey. The VNDHS 1997 was designed to provide separate estimates for the whole country, urban and rural areas, for 18 project provinces and the remaining nonproject provinces as well. Because the main objective of the VNDHS 2002 was to measure change in reproductive health indicators over the five years since the VNDHS 1997, the sample design for the VNDHS 2002 was as similar as possible to that of the VNDHS 1997.
Although it would have been ideal to have returned to the same households or at least the same sample points as were selected for the VNDHS 1997, several factors made this undesirable. Revisiting the same households would have held the sample artificially rigid over time and would not allow for newly formed households. This would have conflicted with the other major survey objective, which was to provide up-to-date, representative data for the whole of Vietnam. Revisiting the same sample points that were covered in 1997 was complicated by the fact that the country had conducted a population census in 1999, which allowed for a more representative sample frame.
In order to balance the two main objectives of measuring change and providing representative data, it was decided to select enumeration areas from the 1999 Population Census, but to cover the same communes that were sampled in the VNDHS 1997 and attempt to obtain a sample point as close as possible to that selected in 1997. Consequently, the VNDHS 2002 sample also consisted of 205 sample points and reflects the oversampling in the 20 provinces that fall in the World Bank-supported Population and Family Health Project. The sample was designed to produce about 7,000 completed household interviews and 5,600 completed interviews with ever-married women age 15-49.
Face-to-face
As in the VNDHS 1997, three types of questionnaires were used in the 2002 survey: the Household Questionnaire, the Individual Woman's Questionnaire, and the Community/Health Facility Questionnaire. The first two questionnaires were based on the DHS Model A Questionnaire, with additions and modifications made during an ORC Macro staff visit in July 2002. The questionnaires were pretested in two clusters in Hanoi (one in a rural area and another in an urban area). After the pretest and consultation with ORC Macro, the drafts were revised for use in the main survey.
a) The Household Questionnaire was used to enumerate all usual members and visitors in selected households and to collect information on age, sex, education, marital status, and relationship to the head of household. The main purpose of the Household Questionnaire was to identify persons who were eligible for individual interview (i.e. ever-married women age 15-49). In addition, the Household Questionnaire collected information on characteristics of the household such as water source, type of toilet facilities, material used for the floor and roof, and ownership of various durable goods.
b) The Individual Questionnaire was used to collect information on ever-married women aged 15-49 in surveyed households. These women were interviewed on the following topics:
- Respondent's background characteristics (education, residential history, etc.);
- Reproductive history;
- Contraceptive knowledge and use;
- Antenatal and delivery care;
- Infant feeding practices;
- Child immunization;
- Fertility preferences and attitudes about family planning;
- Husband's background characteristics;
- Women's work information; and
- Knowledge of AIDS.
c) The Community/Health Facility Questionnaire was used to collect information on all communes in which the interviewed women lived and on services offered at the nearest health stations. The Community/Health Facility Questionnaire consisted of four sections. The first two sections collected information from community informants on some characteristics such as the major economic activities of residents, distance from people's residence to civic services and the location of the nearest sources of health care. The last two sections involved visiting the nearest commune health centers and intercommune health centers, if these centers were located within 30 kilometers from the surveyed cluster. For each visited health center, information was collected on the type of health services offered and the number of days services were offered per week; the number of assigned staff and their training; medical equipment and medicines available at the time of the visit.
The first stage of data editing was implemented by the field editors soon after each interview. Field editors and team leaders checked the completeness and consistency of all items in the questionnaires. The completed questionnaires were sent to the GSO headquarters in Hanoi by post for data processing. The editing staff of the GSO first checked the questionnaires for completeness. The data were then entered into microcomputers and edited using a software program specially developed for the DHS program, the Census and Survey Processing System, or CSPro. Data were verified on a 100 percent basis, i.e., the data were entered separately twice and the two results were compared and corrected. The data processing and editing staff of the GSO were trained and supervised for two weeks by a data processing specialist from ORC Macro. Office editing and processing activities were initiated immediately after the beginning of the fieldwork and were completed in late December 2002.
The results of the household and individual
Premium B2C Consumer Database - 269+ Million US Records
Supercharge your B2C marketing campaigns with comprehensive consumer database, featuring over 269 million verified US consumer records. Our 20+ year data expertise delivers higher quality and more extensive coverage than competitors.
Core Database Statistics
Consumer Records: Over 269 million
Email Addresses: Over 160 million (verified and deliverable)
Phone Numbers: Over 76 million (mobile and landline)
Mailing Addresses: Over 116,000,000 (NCOA processed)
Geographic Coverage: Complete US (all 50 states)
Compliance Status: CCPA compliant with consent management
Targeting Categories Available
Demographics: Age ranges, education levels, occupation types, household composition, marital status, presence of children, income brackets, and gender (where legally permitted)
Geographic: Nationwide, state-level, MSA (Metropolitan Service Area), zip code radius, city, county, and SCF range targeting options
Property & Dwelling: Home ownership status, estimated home value, years in residence, property type (single-family, condo, apartment), and dwelling characteristics
Financial Indicators: Income levels, investment activity, mortgage information, credit indicators, and wealth markers for premium audience targeting
Lifestyle & Interests: Purchase history, donation patterns, political preferences, health interests, recreational activities, and hobby-based targeting
Behavioral Data: Shopping preferences, brand affinities, online activity patterns, and purchase timing behaviors
Multi-Channel Campaign Applications
Deploy across all major marketing channels:
Email marketing and automation
Social media advertising
Search and display advertising (Google, YouTube)
Direct mail and print campaigns
Telemarketing and SMS campaigns
Programmatic advertising platforms
Data Quality & Sources
Our consumer data aggregates from multiple verified sources:
Public records and government databases
Opt-in subscription services and registrations
Purchase transaction data from retail partners
Survey participation and research studies
Online behavioral data (privacy compliant)
Technical Delivery Options
File Formats: CSV, Excel, JSON, XML formats available
Delivery Methods: Secure FTP, API integration, direct download
Processing: Real-time NCOA, email validation, phone verification
Custom Selections: 1,000+ selectable demographic and behavioral attributes
Minimum Orders: Flexible based on targeting complexity
Unique Value Propositions
Dual Spouse Targeting: Reach both household decision-makers for maximum impact
Cross-Platform Integration: Seamless deployment to major ad platforms
Real-Time Updates: Monthly data refreshes ensure maximum accuracy
Advanced Segmentation: Combine multiple targeting criteria for precision campaigns
Compliance Management: Built-in opt-out and suppression list management
Ideal Customer Profiles
E-commerce retailers seeking customer acquisition
Financial services companies targeting specific demographics
Healthcare organizations with compliant marketing needs
Automotive dealers and service providers
Home improvement and real estate professionals
Insurance companies and agents
Subscription services and SaaS providers
Performance Optimization Features
Lookalike Modeling: Create audiences similar to your best customers
Predictive Scoring: Identify high-value prospects using AI algorithms
Campaign Attribution: Track performance across multiple touchpoints
A/B Testing Support: Split audiences for campaign optimization
Suppression Management: Automatic opt-out and DNC compliance
Pricing & Volume Options
Flexible pricing structures accommodate businesses of all sizes:
Pay-per-record for small campaigns
Volume discounts for large deployments
Subscription models for ongoing campaigns
Custom enterprise pricing for high-volume users
Data Compliance & Privacy
VIA.tools maintains industry-leading compliance standards:
CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) compliant
CAN-SPAM Act adherence for email marketing
TCPA compliance for phone and SMS campaigns
Regular privacy audits and data governance reviews
Transparent opt-out and data deletion processes
Getting Started
Our data specialists work with you to:
Define your target audience criteria
Recommend optimal data selections
Provide sample data for testing
Configure delivery methods and formats
Implement ongoing campaign optimization
Why We Lead the Industry
With over two decades of data industry experience, we combine extensive database coverage with advanced targeting capabilities. Our commitment to data quality, compliance, and customer success has made us the preferred choice for businesses seeking superior B2C marketing performance.
Contact our team to discuss your specific targeting requirements and receive custom pricing for your marketing objectives.
To provide a snapshot of citywide student enrollment and demographic information across multiple years. Data is collected using multiple data sources, including DOE's Audited Register, biographic data from Automate The Schools (ATS) system and the Location Code Generation and Management System (LCGMS). Data can be used to view citywide demographic and enrollment trends over time. Enrollment counts are based on the October 31 Audited Register for each school year. Please note that October 31 enrollment is not audited for charter schools or Pre-K Early Education Centers(NYCEECs). Charter schools are required to submit enrollment as of BEDS Day the first Wednesday in October to the New York State Education Department of Education. Enrollment counts will exceed operational enrollment counts due the fact that long term absence (LTA) students are excluded for funding purposes.
This map service displays demographic data used in EJSCREEN. All demographic data were derived from American Community Survey 2006-2010 estimates. EJSCREEN is an environmental justice screening tool that provides EPA with a nationally consistent approach to screening for potential areas of EJ concern that may warrant further investigation. The EJ indexes are block group level results that combine multiple demographic factors with a single environmental variable (such as proximity to traffic) that can be used to help identify communities living with the greatest potential for negative environmental and health effects. The EJSCREEN tool is currently for internal EPA use only. It is anticipated that as users become accustomed to this new tool, individual programs within the Agency will develop program use guidelines and a community of practice will develop around them within the EPA Geoplatform. Users should keep in mind that screening tools are subject to substantial uncertainty in their demographic and environmental data, particularly when looking at small geographic areas, such as Census block groups. Data on the full range of environmental impacts and demographic factors in any given location are almost certainly not available directly through this tool, and its initial results should be supplemented with additional information and local knowledge before making any judgments about potential areas of EJ concern.
By Health [source]
The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) offers an expansive collection of data on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) from 1993 to 2010. Over this time period, the Health-Related Quality of Life dataset consists of a comprehensive survey reflecting the health and well-being of non-institutionalized US adults aged 18 years or older. The data collected can help track and identify unmet population health needs, recognize trends, identify disparities in healthcare, determine determinants of public health, inform decision making and policy development, as well as evaluate programs within public healthcare services.
The HRQOL surveillance system has developed a compact set of HRQOL measures such as a summary measure indicating unhealthy days which have been validated for population health surveillance purposes and have been widely implemented in practice since 1993. Within this study's dataset you will be able to access information such as year recorded, location abbreviations & descriptions, category & topic overviews, questions asked in surveys and much more detailed information including types & units regarding data values retrieved from respondents along with their sample sizes & geographical locations involved!
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
This dataset tracks the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) from 1993 to 2010 using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This dataset includes information on the year, location abbreviation, location description, type and unit of data value, sample size, category and topic of survey questions.
Using this dataset on BRFSS: HRQOL data between 1993-2010 will allow for a variety of analyses related to population health needs. The compact set of HRQOL measures can be used to identify trends in population health needs as well as determine disparities among various locations. Additionally, responses to survey questions can be used to inform decision making and program and policy development in public health initiatives.
- Analyzing trends in HRQOL over the years by location to identify disparities in health outcomes between different populations and develop targeted policy interventions.
- Developing new models for predicting HRQOL indicators at a regional level, and using this information to inform medical practice and public health implementation efforts.
- Using the data to understand differences between states in terms of their HRQOL scores and establish best practices for healthcare provision based on that understanding, including areas such as access to care, preventative care services availability, etc
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
See the dataset description for more information.
File: rows.csv | Column name | Description | |:-------------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------| | Year | Year of survey. (Integer) | | LocationAbbr | Abbreviation of location. (String) | | LocationDesc | Description of location. (String) | | Category | Category of survey. (String) | | Topic | Topic of survey. (String) | | Question | Question asked in survey. (String) | | DataSource | Source of data. (String) | | Data_Value_Unit | Unit of data value. (String) | | Data_Value_Type | Type of data value. (String) | | Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol | Footnote symbol for data value. (String) | | Data_Value_Std_Err | Standard error of the data value. (Float) | | Sample_Size | Sample size used in sample. (Integer) | | Break_Out | Break out categories used. (String) | | Break_Out_Category | Type break out assessed. (String) | | **GeoLocation*...
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
De facto population by difference between the location at the moment of census and permanentplace of residence.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Demographic statistical domains – DeSO is a national classification created by Statistics Sweden that came into force in January 2018. DeSO divides Sweden into 5,984 areas with between 700 and 2,700 inhabitants at the start. The division follows the county and municipal boundaries. DeSO does not have names or names but is described by a code with nine unique positions. The first four consist of the county and municipality code and indicate the county and municipality in which the area is located. The fifth position indicates which category the area belongs to A, B or C. A are areas that are mostly outside major population concentrations or agglomerations. B are areas which are mostly in population concentrations or urban agglomerations but which are not a central location. Category C is the area that is mostly located in the municipality's central city. The three subsequent positions consist of a sequential number that sorts the areas geographically. This sorting is based on the categories and starts in the south and continues north. The last position is a reserve that will be used in case a DeSO needs to be split up in the future. A DeSO can only occur in one location.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer contains WorldPop's 100m resolution annual estimates of population density from the year 2000 to 2020. Usage notes: This layer is configured to be viewed only at a scale range for large-scale maps, i.e., zoomed into small areas of the world. Because the underlying data for this layer is relatively large and because raster pyramids cannot accurately represent aggregated population density, there are no pyramids. Thus, this layer may at times require 10 to 15 seconds to draw. We recommend using this layer in conjunction with WorldPop's 1-km resolution Population Density layer to create web maps that allow users to pan and zoom to wider areas; this web map contains an example of this combination. The population estimates in this layer are derived WorldPop's total population data, which use a Top-down unconstrained method which estimates the total population for each cell with a Random Forest-based dasymetric model (Stevens, F. R., Gaughan, A. E., Linard, C., & Tatem, A. J. (2015). Disaggregating census data for population mapping using random forests with remotely-sensed and ancillary data. PloS one, 10(2), e0107042) and converts these values to population density by dividing the number of people in each pixel by the pixel surface area. This diagram visually describes this model that uses known populated locations to analyze imagery to find similarly populated locations. The DOI for the original WorldPop.org total population population data is 10.5258/SOTON/WP00645.Recommended Citation: WorldPop (www.worldpop.org - School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton; Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of Louisville; Departement de Geographie, Universite de Namur) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University (2018). Global High Resolution Population Denominators Project - Funded by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Accessed from https://worldpop.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/WorldPop_Total_Population_100m/ImageServer, which was acquired from WorldPop in December 2021.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the Fidelity population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Fidelity. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Fidelity by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Fidelity.
Key observations
The largest age group in Fidelity, MO was for the group of age 25-29 years with a population of 62 (16.67%), according to the 2021 American Community Survey. At the same time, the smallest age group in Fidelity, MO was the 75-79 years with a population of 3 (0.81%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.
Age groups:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Fidelity Population by Age. You can refer the same here
Table from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series on age and gender related topics for City of Seattle Council Districts, Comprehensive Plan Growth Areas and Community Reporting Areas. Table includes B01001 Sex by Age, B01002 Median Age by Sex. Data is pulled from block group tables for the most recent ACS vintage and summarized to the neighborhoods based on block group assignment.Table created for and used in the Neighborhood Profiles application.Vintages: 2023ACS Table(s): B01001, B01002Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's Explore Census Data The United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estima
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9453/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9453/terms
Designed to facilitate analysis of the status of Blacks around the turn of the century, this oversample of Black-headed households in the United States was drawn from the 1910 manuscript census schedules. The sample complements the 1/250 Public Use Sample of the 1910 census manuscripts collected by Samuel H. Preston at the University of Pennsylvania: CENSUS OF POPULATION, 1910 [UNITED STATES]: PUBLIC USE SAMPLE (ICPSR 9166). Part 1, Household Records, contains a record for each household selected in the sample and supplies variables describing the location, type, and composition of the households. Part 2, Individual Records, contains a record for each individual residing in the sampled households and includes information on demographic characteristics, occupation, literacy, nativity, ethnicity, and fertility.
This point shapefile represents the prefecture city locations, with 2000 population census data, for the Jiangsu Sheng province of China for 2000. These data are represented at 1:1,000,000 scale. This layer is part of the China 2000 township population census dataset.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The most significant cohorts of users on Instagram are aged 18 – 24.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset tabulates the Hart's Location town population by age cohorts (Children: Under 18 years; Working population: 18-64 years; Senior population: 65 years or more). It lists the population in each age cohort group along with its percentage relative to the total population of Hart's Location town. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution across children, working population and senior population for dependency ratio, housing requirements, ageing, migration patterns etc.
Key observations
The largest age group was 65 years and over with a poulation of 25 (51.02% of the total population). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.
Age cohorts:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Hart's Location town Population by Age. You can refer the same here