7 datasets found
  1. U.S. political nonprofit spending 2000-2024, by group

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. political nonprofit spending 2000-2024, by group [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1557336/political-nonprofit-spending-group-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2012, social welfare organizations spent over *** million dollars on U.S. elections. In comparison, social welfare organizations spent almost ** million U.S. dollars on U.S. elections in 2024, significantly less than years prior.

  2. g

    Einstellung zur Volkszählung (Panelstudie)

    • search.gesis.org
    • da-ra.de
    Updated Apr 13, 2010
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gräf, Lorenz; Kühnel, Steffen M.; Scheuch, Erwin K. (2010). Einstellung zur Volkszählung (Panelstudie) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.1592
    Explore at:
    application/x-stata-dta(1911986), application/x-spss-por(3636208), application/x-spss-sav(1966972)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 13, 2010
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS Data Archive
    GESIS search
    Authors
    Gräf, Lorenz; Kühnel, Steffen M.; Scheuch, Erwin K.
    License

    https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

    Variables measured
    IDNR -, LFDNR -, P1001 -, P1002 -, P1003 -, P1004 -, P1005 -, P1006 -, P1007 -, P1008 -, and 647 more
    Description

    Attitude of the Federal German population and census critics to the census on 31. May 1987.

    Summary of three data sets archived and described under ZA Study Nos. 1588 to 1590.

    Topics: 1. From the first wave of 1987: political interest; satisfaction with democracy in the Federal Republic; feeling of political effectiveness and degree of representation by politicians and parties; orientation of government policies on special interests or public welfare; attitude to the census; intent of members of household and respondent to participate; willingness to participate after notice of threat of fine; filling out the survey form oneself or by another person in household; conversations about the census in social surroundings and time of last conversation; attitude to the census in circle of friends and acquaintances as well as their willingness to participate; importance of political attitudes in social surroundings and visibility of one´s own views; knowledge about contents of the census survey (scale); assumed difficulty in filling out survey form; preference for filling out the form in the presence of the canvasser or alone; misgivings about canvasser in residence; difficulties in carrying out official matters; frequency of contact and ability to establish contacts; trust in institutions and organizations; self-assessment on a left-right continuum; assumed position of the majority of the population on a left-right continuum; postmaterialism; sympathy scale for political parties; frequency of use of television news broadcasts as well as the local part and political part of a daily newspaper; time of last noticed media reports about the census and content tendency of these programs; assumed attitude of the population to the census; living together with a partner and his attitude to the census; assumed participation of partner in the census; response or boycott conduct in the census survey; attitude to government statistics; attitude to punishment of census boycotters and preferred governmental behavior regarding refusal; personal fears regarding misuse of personal census data; trust in observance of data protection; sympathies regarding social movements as well as personal membership; party preference; perceived fears and their causes; attitude to technology; attitude to computers and scientific innovations; attitude to government dealing with data; assessment of census refusers as system opponents; attitude to storage of personal data; importance of data protection and trust in observance of the data protection regulation; judgement on quality of data protection; earlier participation in a survey and type of survey; attitude to selected infringements and crimes as well as other illegal actions (scale); religiousness; union membership; self-assessment of social class; possession of a telephone; willingness to participate in a re-interview.

    The following additional questions were posed to persons with strong or very strong political interest: demographic information on circle of close friends (ego-centered network); agreement with respondent regarding party preference and attitude to the census; willingness of friends to participate in the census; familiarity of friends among each other; personal willingness to participate in selected political forms of protest (scale); personal fears regarding misuse of personal data by selected institutions and public offices.

    Demography: month of birth; year of birth; sex; marital status; number of children; ages of children (classified); frequency of church attendance; school education; vocational training; occupation; occupational position; employment; monthly net income of respondent and household altogether; number of persons contributing to household income; size of household; position of respondent in household; characteristics of head of household; number of persons eligible to vote in household; persons in household who do not have German citizenship; self-assessment of social class; union membership of respondent and other members of household; possession of a telephone.

    Interviewer rating: presence of third persons during interview and person desiring this presence; intervention of others in interview and person introducing the intervention; attitude to the census of persons additionally present during interview; presence of further persons in other rooms; willingness to cooperate and reliability of respondent.

    Also encoded was: length of interview; date of interview; ident...

  3. g

    Einstellung zur Volkszählung (Panel: 1. Welle, April-Mai 1987)

    • search.gesis.org
    • da-ra.de
    Updated Apr 13, 2010
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gräf, Lorenz; Kühnel, Steffen M.; Scheuch, Erwin K. (2010). Einstellung zur Volkszählung (Panel: 1. Welle, April-Mai 1987) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.1588
    Explore at:
    application/x-spss-por(1495727), application/x-stata-dta(795093), application/x-spss-sav(843328)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 13, 2010
    Dataset provided by
    GESIS Data Archive
    GESIS search
    Authors
    Gräf, Lorenz; Kühnel, Steffen M.; Scheuch, Erwin K.
    License

    https://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-termshttps://www.gesis.org/en/institute/data-usage-terms

    Description

    Attitude of the German population and of census critics to the census before census day, 31 May 1987. Political attitudes.

    Topics: political interest; satisfaction with democracy in the Federal Republic; feeling of political effectiveness and degree of representation by politicians and parties; orientation of government policies on personal interest or public welfare; attitude to the census; intent to participate of members of household and respondent; willingness to participate after reference to threat of fine; filling out the survey questionnaire oneself or by another person in household; conversations about the census in social surroundings and time of last conversation; attitude to the census in circle of friends and acquaintances as well as their willingness to participate; importance of political attitudes in social surroundings and visibility of one´s own views; knowledge about contents of the census survey (scale); assumed difficulty of filling out the survey questionnaire; preference for filling it out in the presence of the canvasser or alone; misgivings about canvassers in residence; difficulties in taking care of official matters; frequency of contact and ability to establish contacts; trust in institutions and organizations; self-assessment on a left-right continuum; assumed position of the majority of the population on a left-right continuum; postmaterialism; sympathy scale for political parties; frequency of use of television news broadcasts as well as local news and political part of a daily newspaper; time of last noticed media reports about the census and tendency of content of these articles; assumed attitude of the population to the census; living together with a partner and his attitude to the census; assumed participation of partner in the census; response or boycott behavior during the census survey; attitude to government statistics; attitude to punishment of census boycotters and preferred government behavior regarding refusals; personal concerns regarding misuse of personal census data; trust in observance of data protection; sympathy regarding social movements as well as personal membership; party preference; perceived fears and their causes; attitude to technology; attitude to computers and to scientific innovations; attitude to government behavior with data; assessment of census refusers as system opponents; attitude to storing personal data; importance of data protection and trust in observance of the data protection regulation; judgement on the quality of data protection; earlier participation in a survey and type of survey; attitude to selected infringements of law and crimes as well as other illegal actions (scale); religiousness; union membership; self-assessment of social class; possession of a telephone; willingness to participate in a re-interview.

    The following additional questions were posed to persons with strong or very strong political interest: demographic information on close circle of friends (ego-centered network); agreement with the respondent regarding party preference and attitude to the census; willingness of friends to participate in the census; familiarity of friends with each other; personal willingness to participate in selected political forms of protest (scale); personal concerns regarding misuse of personal data by selected institutions and government offices.

    Demography: month of birth; year of birth; sex; marital status; number of children; ages of children (classified); religious denomination; frequency of church attendance; school education; vocational training; occupation; occupational position; employment; monthly gross income of respondent and household altogether; number of persons contributing to household income; size of household; position of respondent in household; characteristics of head of household; number of persons eligible to vote in household; persons in household who do not have German citizenship; self-assessment of social class; union membership of respondent and other members of household; possession of a telephone.

    Interviewer rating: presence of third persons during interview and person desiring this presence; intervention of others in interview and person introducing this intervention; attitude to the census of additional persons present during interview; presence of further persons in other rooms; willingness to cooperate and reliability of respondent.

    Also encoded was: length of interview; date of interview; identification of ...

  4. Perception of discrimination due to disability when exercising civil and...

    • datos.gob.es
    Updated Feb 7, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2023). Perception of discrimination due to disability when exercising civil and political rights, by gender and disability group. Population aged 18 and over with a disability. . (API identifier: 51780) [Dataset]. https://datos.gob.es/en/catalogo/ea0010587-percepcion-de-discriminacion-por-motivo-de-su-discapacidad-a-la-hora-de-ejercer-derechos-civiles-y-politicos-por-sexo-y-grupo-de-discapacidad-poblacion-de-18-y-mas-anos-con-discapacidad-identificador-api-51780
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    National Statistics Institutehttp://www.ine.es/
    Authors
    Instituto Nacional de Estadística
    License

    https://www.ine.es/aviso_legalhttps://www.ine.es/aviso_legal

    Description

    Table of INEBase Perception of discrimination due to disability when exercising civil and political rights, by gender and disability group. Population aged 18 and over with a disability. . National. Disability, Independence and Dependency Situations Survey

  5. Political party most apt at tackling unemployment in GB in 2017, by age

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Political party most apt at tackling unemployment in GB in 2017, by age [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/713825/political-party-best-suited-for-handling-employment-issues-age/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 5, 2017 - Jun 7, 2017
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    This statistics shows the most suitable political parties for dealing with issues concerning unemployment in the United Kingdom according to an opinion poll among adults in Great Britain in June 2017, broken-down by age group. Of respondents between the ages of 18-24, ** percent reported they believed the Labour Party to be the most able at handling unemployment, compared with ** percent of respondents aged 65 and older. ** percent of respondents over the age of ** were sure the Conservative Party would be best at dealing with issues facing unemployment, while ** percent of respondents aged 18-24 believed in the ability of the Conservative Party.

  6. Political party most apt at tackling unemployment in GB in 2017, by gender

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 10, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Political party most apt at tackling unemployment in GB in 2017, by gender [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/713821/political-party-best-for-handling-employment-issues-gender/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 5, 2017 - Jun 7, 2017
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    This statistic shows the most suitable political parties for dealing with issues concerning unemployment in Great Britain according to an opinion poll among adults in Great Britain in *********, broken down by gender. Of female respondents, ** percent reported they believed the Labour Party to be the most able at handling unemployment, compared with ** percent of male respondents. ** percent of male respondents were sure the Conservative Party would be best at dealing with issues facing unemployment, while ** percent of female respondents were unsure which party they could put their trust in.

  7. Number of food bank parcels distributed in the UK 2014-2025

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Number of food bank parcels distributed in the UK 2014-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/382695/uk-foodbank-users/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    In 2024/25, approximately 2.9 million emergency food parcels were distributed from Trussell Trust food banks in the United Kingdom, compared with 3.1 million in 2023/24. There has been a steep rise in food bank usage in the UK, with a threefold increase in the number of parcels distributed in 2023/24, compared with 2014/15. As of the most recent year, there were over 1,700 Trussell Trust food bank distribution centers in the UK, compared with 1,500 in 2018/19. Cost of Living crisis continues Since late 2021, UK households have had to grapple with a steep rise in the cost of living. This crisis appeared to have peaked in 2022, when around 90 percent of households were reporting monthly increases to their living costs, and inflation reached a 40-year high of 11.1 percent in October 2022. Although inflation subsequently came down and wages began to outpace inflation from 2023 onward, prices remain far higher than before the crisis began. Furthermore, the first half of 2025 has seen an uptick in inflation, which, although expected to subside towards the end of the year, has piled further misery on struggling UK households. Growing discontent with political mainstream After one year in power, the current Labour government is almost as unpopular as the Conservative government they replaced, which suffered one of their worst results in their history at the last election. To deal with the UK's precarious public finances without significant tax rises, Labour have attempted to make reforms to welfare, such as cutting the winter fuel allowances for all but the poorest pensioners. This cut in particular was so unpopular that Labour reinstated it for most pensioners, with further attempts at welfare reform also hitting a roadblock. These events, along with a stuttering economy, have seen Labour fall significantly at the polls, especially at the expense of the right-wing Reform Party, who have generally led the polls since the start of the year.

  8. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). U.S. political nonprofit spending 2000-2024, by group [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1557336/political-nonprofit-spending-group-us/
Organization logo

U.S. political nonprofit spending 2000-2024, by group

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 18, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

In 2012, social welfare organizations spent over *** million dollars on U.S. elections. In comparison, social welfare organizations spent almost ** million U.S. dollars on U.S. elections in 2024, significantly less than years prior.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu