From 2011 to 2022, Sweden had the highest gross domestic product (GDP) of the Nordic countries. In 2022, it was estimated to be at 591 billion U.S. dollars, and is expected to reach almost 720 billion in 2027. Norway had the second highest GDP in this time period, but it dropped significantly after the fall in the oil price in 2014. Denmark has consistently been the third largest Nordic economy in this time. Iceland has the lowest GDP in the region, with just 28 billion U.S. dollars in 2022; around 10 percent the size of Finland's.

Time series data for the data Real Gross Domestic Product - Components - Current Local Curreny Unit (CLU) for the country Denmark. Indicator Definition:Real Private Sector Final Consumption Expenditure, Unadjusted, Domestic CurrencyThe indicator "Real Private Sector Final Consumption Expenditure, Unadjusted, Domestic Currency" stands at 1.03 Trillion Danish Krones as of 6/30/2025, the highest value since 6/30/2023. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an increase of 1.96 percent compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change in percent is 1.96.The 3 year change in percent is -3.64.The 5 year change in percent is 3.00.The 10 year change in percent is 14.99.The Serie's long term average value is 0.884 Trillion Danish Krones. It's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is 16.15 percent higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 3/31/1997, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is +43.40%.The Serie's change in percent from it's maximum value, on 3/31/2022, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is -3.84%.Indicator Definition:Real General Government Final Consumption Expenditure, Unadjusted, Domestic CurrencyThe indicator "Real General Government Final Consumption Expenditure, Unadjusted, Domestic Currency" stands at 0.5373 Trillion Danish Krones as of 6/30/2025. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an increase of 0.2404 percent compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change in percent is 0.2404.The 3 year change in percent is -0.714.The 5 year change in percent is 2.26.The 10 year change in percent is 3.82.The Serie's long term average value is 0.477 Trillion Danish Krones. It's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is 12.61 percent higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 3/31/1997, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is +43.35%.The Serie's change in percent from it's maximum value, on 3/31/2022, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is -1.67%.Indicator Definition:Real Gross Fixed Capital Formation, Unadjusted, Domestic CurrencyThe indicator "Real Gross Fixed Capital Formation, Unadjusted, Domestic Currency" stands at 0.5232 Trillion Danish Krones as of 6/30/2025. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an increase of 3.46 percent compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change in percent is 3.46.The 3 year change in percent is 0.5636.The 5 year change in percent is 18.17.The 10 year change in percent is 41.24.The Serie's long term average value is 0.386 Trillion Danish Krones. It's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is 35.61 percent higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 3/31/1997, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is +95.69%.The Serie's change in percent from it's maximum value, on 9/30/2023, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is -1.91%.Indicator Definition:Real Changes in Inventories, Unadjusted, Domestic CurrencyThe indicator "Real Changes in Inventories, Unadjusted, Domestic Currency" stands at 0.0071 Trillion Danish Krones as of 6/30/2025. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an decrease of -0.0023 Trillion Danish Krones compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change is -0.0023 Trillion Danish Krones.The 3 year change is -0.0371 Trillion Danish Krones.The 5 year change is -0.0027 Trillion Danish Krones.The 10 year change is -0.0045 Trillion Danish Krones.The Serie's long term average value is 0.0153 Trillion Danish Krones. It's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is -0.0081 Trillion Danish Krones lower, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in Danish Krones from it's minimum value, on 12/31/2009, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is +0.0259 Trillion.The Serie's change in Danish Krones from it's maximum value, on 9/30/2022, to it's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is -0.0408 Trillion.Indicator Definition:Net Trade is defined as exports minus imports (measured in local currency units (LCU)).The indicator "Net Trade (Current LCU)" stands at 0.2131 Trillion Danish Krones as of 6/30/2025, the highest value at least since 6/30/1997, the period currently displayed. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an increase of 17.42 percent compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change in percent is 17.42.The 3 year change in percent is 241.91.The 5 year change in percent is 91.16.The 10 year change in percent is 80.23.The Serie's long term average value is 0.117 Trillion Danish Krones. It's latest available value, on 6/30/2025, is 82.27 percent higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 9/30/2021, to it's latest ...

The statistic shows the growth of the real gross domestic product (GDP) in the EU member states in the second quarter 2025 compared to the same quarter of the previous year. GDP is the total value of all goods and services produced in a country in a year. It is considered to be a very important indicator of the economic strength of a country and a positive change in it is a sign of economic growth. In the second quarter of 2025, the real GDP in Denmark increased by 1.2 percent compared to the same quarter of the previous year. The overall EU GDP amounted to around 15.8 trillion euros around the same time. Global economy and the economic crisis The global economy has been slowly recovery after having been devastated by the global financial crisis in 2008. The economic crisis, which hit Greece, Ireland and Portugal, among other countries, severely, marked the beginning of the European sovereign debt crisis which forced these nations to request a bailout between 2013 and 2014. In November 2014, the unemployment rate in Greece amounted to around a desastrous 25 percent, which means one quarter of Greeks who were of working age were out of work. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate average for the whole European Union was at 10 percent. In addition, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Ireland ranked at the top of the list of the nations in the European Union with the largest national debt in relation to the gross domestic product. In the third quarter of 2014, Greece’s national debt amounted to 176 percent of the gross domestic product. Despite the crisis, the global economy is expected to improve. It is estimated that GDP in the European Union will grow by 1.85 percent in 2015 in comparison to the previous year. Also, the national debt in relation to GDP in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Ireland will decrease between 2015 and 2016.

Time series data for the statistic GDP_Per_Capita_PPP_Current_International_USD and country Denmark. Indicator Definition:This statistic provides per capita values for gross domestic product (GDP) expressed in current international dollars converted by purchasing power parity (PPP) conversion factor. GDP is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the country plus any product taxes and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. conversion factor is a spatial price deflator and currency converter that controls for price level differences between countries. Total population is a mid-year population based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship.The statistic "GDP Per Capita PPP Current International USD" stands at 79,514.29 United States Dollars as of 12/31/2024, the highest value at least since 12/31/1991, the period currently displayed. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an increase of 7.83 percent compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change in percent is 7.83.The 3 year change in percent is 14.06.The 5 year change in percent is 31.22.The 10 year change in percent is 66.07.The Serie's long term average value is 40,911.58 United States Dollars. It's latest available value, on 12/31/2024, is 94.36 percent higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 12/31/1990, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2024, is +336.23%.The Serie's change in percent from it's maximum value, on 12/31/2024, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2024, is 0.0%.

Until 2014, Norway's gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was a lot higher than the other Nordic countries'. However, after the fall of the oil price in 2014, Norway's GDP per capita decreased, but is still the highest in the region, and it increased to over ******* U.S. dollars in 2022. Moreover, while Iceland had the lowest GDP per capita together with Finland in 2015, it had the second highest in 2023 ahead of Denmark. The Nordic countries have some of the highest GDPs per capita in the world.

Time series data for the statistic Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%) and country Denmark. Indicator Definition:The ratio of consolidated foreign claims to GDP of the banks that are reporting to BIS. Foreign claims are defined as the sum of cross-border claims plus foreign offices’ local claims in all currencies. In the consolidated banking statistics claims that are granted or extended to nonresidents are referred to as either cross-border claims. In the context of the consolidated banking statistics, local claims refer to claims of domestic banks’ foreign affiliates (branches/subsidiaries) on the residents of the host country (i.e. country of residence of affiliates). Items (A+L from BIS Table 9A). End-of-year data (i.e. December data) are considered for banks claims. GDP is from World Development Indicators.The indicator "Consolidated foreign claims of BIS reporting banks to GDP (%)" stands at 92.90 as of 12/31/2020. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes an increase of 8.69 percent compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change in percent is 8.69.The 3 year change in percent is -0.4977.The 5 year change in percent is -2.83.The 10 year change in percent is -13.04.The Serie's long term average value is 80.05. It's latest available value, on 12/31/2020, is 16.06 percent higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 12/31/1997, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2020, is +68,505.79%.The Serie's change in percent from it's maximum value, on 12/31/2013, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2020, is -15.93%.

Time series data for the statistic Government expenditure on tertiary education as % of GDP (%) and country Denmark. Indicator Definition:Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on tertiary education (current, capital, and transfers), expressed as a percentage of GDP. It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Divide total government expenditure for a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by the GDP, and multiply by 100. A higher percentage of GDP spent on education shows a higher government priority for education, but also a higher capacity of the government to raise revenues for public spending, in relation to the size of the country's economy. When interpreting this indicator however, one should keep in mind in some countries, the private sector and/or households may fund a higher proportion of total funding for education, thus making government expenditure appear lower than in other countries. Limitations: In some instances data on total public expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/The Serie's long term average value is 1.84. It's latest available value, on 12/31/2017, is 33.50 percent higher, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 12/31/1979, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2017, is +164.09%.The Serie's change in percent from it's maximum value, on 12/31/2001, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2017, is -6.96%.

Denmark donated the most significant percentage of its 2021 gross domestic product (GDP) to help Ukraine over the period between January 2022, and June 2025. Denmark contributed 2.89 percent of its GDP in bilateral aid, followed by Estonia with 2.8 percent of GDP. Besides the Nordic and Baltic countries, the Netherlands donated the largest share of GDP. Western countries sent aid to Ukraine in view of the Russian invasion that began in February 2022. Who donated the most to Ukraine? In absolute terms, the largest bilateral aid allocations to Ukraine were made by the United States, at over 114 billion euros as of June 2025. European Union (EU) institutions, such as the European Commission and the European Council, allocated the second-largest amount of assistance, at almost 63.2 billion euros. The United Kingdom (UK) was the fourth-leading source of bilateral aid. EU aid to Ukraine The EU has supported Ukraine with over 69 billion euros in financial assistance as of January 2022. Of them, the largest share of aid has been provided as additional loans from the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Among EU members, Germany allocated the largest amount of bilateral aid to Ukraine from January 24, 2022, at around 22 billion euros, while Estonia allocated the largest share of GDP.

The average for 2023 based on 162 countries was 45.02 percent. The highest value was in Luxembourg: 217.77 percent and the lowest value was in Sudan: 1.11 percent. The indicator is available from 1960 to 2024. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

Time series data for the statistic PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $) and country Denmark. Indicator Definition:Purchasing power parity (PPP) conversion factor is a spatial price deflator and currency converter that controls for price level differences between countries, thereby allowing volume comparisons of gross domestic product (GDP) and its expenditure components. This conversion factor is for household final consumption expenditure.The indicator "PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $)" stands at 7.11 usd as of 12/31/2024, the lowest value at least since 12/31/1991, the period currently displayed. Regarding the One-Year-Change of the series, the current value constitutes a decrease of -4.35 percent compared to the value the year prior.The 1 year change in percent is -4.35.The 3 year change in percent is -2.00.The 5 year change in percent is -6.72.The 10 year change in percent is -14.15.The Serie's long term average value is 8.50 usd. It's latest available value, on 12/31/2024, is 16.36 percent lower, compared to it's long term average value.The Serie's change in percent from it's minimum value, on 12/31/2024, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2024, is +0.0%.The Serie's change in percent from it's maximum value, on 12/31/1990, to it's latest available value, on 12/31/2024, is -23.53%.

Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is a measure of economic production, which takes the entire output of a national economy during a year and divides it by the population of that country. In the European Union, Luxembourg, Ireland, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Austria come out on top as the countries which produced the most per capita in 2024. Europe's richest countries benefit from multinational companies Many criticisms have been made of using GDP per capita as away to judge a country's economic wealth in recent years, as global capital flows have come to distort the statistics and to give a warped impression of different countries' wealth. This is most notably the case for Ireland and for Luxembourg, which while certainly high-income countries, have experienced dramatic booms in their GDP over the past two decades due to the accounting practices of the large multinational corporations which have their European headquarters in these member states, such as Facebook and Apple in Dublin, and Amazon in Luxembourg. Will the poorest countries converge towards the EU average? At the bottom of the list, two of the most recent member states of the EU, Romania and Bulgaria, come last in terms of GDP per capita. Whether these countries will be able to capitalize on their relatively low-wages to spur economic growth and experience the convergence towards the older member states of the union shown by countries such as Estonia, Czechia, and Lithuania, remains a pressing issue for these poorer member states.

In 2025, Luxembourg was the country with the highest gross domestic product per capita in the world. Of the 20 listed countries, 13 are in Europe and five are in Asia, alongside the U.S. and Australia. There are no African or Latin American countries among the top 20. Correlation with high living standards While GDP is a useful indicator for measuring the size or strength of an economy, GDP per capita is much more reflective of living standards. For example, when compared to life expectancy or indices such as the Human Development Index or the World Happiness Report, there is a strong overlap - 14 of the 20 countries on this list are also ranked among the 20 happiest countries in 2024, and all 20 have "very high" HDIs. Misleading metrics? GDP per capita figures, however, can be misleading, and to paint a fuller picture of a country's living standards then one must look at multiple metrics. GDP per capita figures can be skewed by inequalities in wealth distribution, and in countries such as those in the Middle East, a relatively large share of the population lives in poverty while a smaller number live affluent lifestyles.

In the build up to the Second World War, the United States was the major power with the highest gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in the world. In 1938, the United States also had the highest overall GDP in the world, and by a significant margin, however differences in GDP per person were much smaller. Switzerland In terms of countries that played a notable economic role in the war, the neutral country of Switzerland had the highest GDP per capita in the world. A large part of this was due to the strength of Switzerland's financial system. Most major currencies abandoned the gold standard early in the Great Depression, however the Swiss Franc remained tied to it until late 1936. This meant that it was the most stable, freely convertible currency available as the world recovered from the Depression, and other major powers of the time sold large amounts of gold to Swiss banks in order to trade internationally. Switzerland was eventually surrounded on all sides by Axis territories and lived under the constant threat of invasion in the war's early years, however Swiss strategic military planning and economic leverage made an invasion potentially more expensive than it was worth. Switzerland maintained its neutrality throughout the war, trading with both sides, although its financial involvement in the Holocaust remains a point of controversy. Why look at GDP per capita? While overall GDP is a stronger indicator of a state's ability to fund its war effort, GDP per capita is more useful in giving context to a country's economic power in relation to its size and providing an insight into living standards and wealth distribution across societies. For example, Germany and the USSR had fairly similar GDPs in 1938, whereas Germany's per capita GDP was more than double that of the Soviet Union. Germany was much more industrialized and technologically advanced than the USSR, and its citizens generally had a greater quality of life. However these factors did not guarantee victory - the fact that the Soviet Union could better withstand the war of attrition and call upon its larger population to replenish its forces greatly contributed to its eventual victory over Germany in 1945.

Between the Wall Street Crash of 1929 and the end of the Great Depression in the late 1930s, the Soviet Union saw the largest growth in its gross domestic product, growing by more than 70 percent between 1929 and 1937/8. The Great Depression began in 1929 in the United States, following the stock market crash in late October. The inter-connectedness of the global economy, particularly between North America and Europe, then came to the fore as the collapse of the U.S. economy exposed the instabilities of other industrialized countries. In contrast, the economic isolation of the Soviet Union and its detachment from the capitalist system meant that it was relatively shielded from these events. 1929-1932 The Soviet Union was one of just three countries listed that experienced GDP growth during the first three years of the Great Depression, with Bulgaria and Denmark being the other two. Bulgaria experienced the largest GDP growth over these three years, increasing by 27 percent, although it was also the only country to experience a decline in growth over the second period. The majority of other European countries saw their GDP growth fall in the depression's early years. However, none experienced the same level of decline as the United States, which dropped by 28 percent. 1932-1938 In the remaining years before the Second World War, all of the listed countries saw their GDP grow significantly, particularly Germany, the Soviet Union, and the United States. Coincidentally, these were the three most powerful nations during the Second World War. This recovery was primarily driven by industrialization, and, again, the U.S., USSR, and Germany all experienced the highest level of industrial growth between 1932 and 1938.

O Produto Interno Bruto (PIB) da Dinamarca foi de 429,46 bilhões de dólares americanos em 2024, de acordo com dados oficiais do Banco Mundial. O valor do PIB da Dinamarca representa 0,40 por cento da economia mundial. Esta página fornece o valor mais recente reportado para o PIB da Dinamarca, além de lançamentos anteriores, máximos e mínimos históricos, previsão de curto prazo e previsão de longo prazo, calendário econômico, consenso de pesquisa e notícias.

Looking at national tax revenues as a share of the gross domestic product (GDP) in *** countries and territories worldwide, Denmark had the highest revenue as a share of its national GDP, with almost **** of its GDP coming from taxes. In Equatorial Guinea, on the other, on the other hand, only *** percent of the national GDP came from taxes.

During the period from 2017 until 2022, the countries which consistently ranked as the most digitalized in the European Union were Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden. These countries scored highly across all categories measured in the EU's digital economy and society index (DESI) - that is, human capital, connectivity, integration of digital technology, and digital public services.

On the other hand, the member states that came at the bottom of the DESI rankings were mostly newer member states who have joined the EU since 2004. Some countries have made great strides in digitalizing their economy and society over this five year period including Italy, Czechia, and Cyprus.

In 2019, Norway spend with 8.7 percent the largest share of its GDP on health care. Austria and Denmark ranked second and third with 8.3 and 8.2 percent respectively. Latvia, Cyprus, and the Switzerland used the lowest share of their GDP of all European countries for their healthcare system.

In 2022, Finland was the European country with the highest score on the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), ranking first in the human capital component thanks to the advanced digital skills of its citizens. Denmark ranked first for its connectivity. Estonia was the first in digital public services. Greece, Bulgaria, and Romania were the member states with the lowest scores in the digitalization of their economy and society.

The average for 2016 based on 74 countries was 783 thefts per 100,000 people. The highest value was in Denmark: 3949 thefts per 100,000 people and the lowest value was in Senegal: 1 thefts per 100,000 people. The indicator is available from 2003 to 2016. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.