This is the unadjusted lower quartile house priced for residential property sales (transactions) in the area for a 12 month period with April in the middle (year-ending September). These figures have been produced by the ONS (Office for National Statistics) using the Land Registry (LR) Price Paid data on residential dwelling transactions.

The LR Price Paid data are comprehensive in that they capture changes of ownership for individual residential properties which have sold for full market value and covers both cash sales and those involving a mortgage.

The lower quartile is the value determined by putting all the house sales for a given year, area and type in order of price and then selecting the price of the house sale which falls three quarters of the way down the list, such that 75Percentage of transactions lie above and 25Percentage lie below that value. These are particularly useful for assessing housing affordability when viewed alongside average and lower quartile income for given areas.

Note that a transaction occurs when a change of freeholder or leaseholder takes place regardless of the amount of money involved and a property can transact more than once in the time period.

The LR records the actual price for which the property changed hands. This will usually be an accurate reflection of the market value for the individual property, but it is not always the case. In order to generate statistics that more accurately reflect market values, the LR has excluded records of houses that were not sold at market value from the dataset. The remaining data are considered a good reflection of market values at the time of the transaction. For full details of exclusions and more information on the methodology used to produce these statistics please see http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/housing/qmis/housepricestatisticsforsmallareasqmi

The LR Price Paid data are not adjusted to reflect the mix of houses in a given area. Fluctuations in the types of house that are sold in that area can cause differences between the lower quartile transactional value of houses and the overall market value of houses.

If, for a given year, for house type and area there were fewer than 5 sales records in the LR Price Paid data, the house price statistics are not reported." Data is Powered by LG Inform Plus and automatically checked for new data on the 3rd of each month.

Updated for 2013-17: US Census American Community Survey data table for: Housing subject area. Provides information about: UPPER VALUE QUARTILE (DOLLARS) for the universe of: Owner-occupied housing units. These data are extrapolated estimates only, based on sampling; they are not actual complete counts. The data is based on 2010 Census Tracts. Table ACS_B25078_UPPERVALUEQUARTILE contains both the Estimate value in the E item for the census topic and an adjacent M item which defines the Margin of Error for the value. The Margin of Error (MOE) is the plus/minus range for the item estimate value, where the range between the Estimate minus the Margin of Error and the Estimate plus the Margin of Error defines the 90% confidence interval of the item value. Many of the Margin of Error values are significant relative to the size of the Estimate value. This table contains 1 item(s) extracted from a larger sequence table. This extracted subset represents that portion of the sequence that is considered high priority. Other portions of this sequence that are not included can be identified in the data dictionary information provided in the Supplemental Information section below. This table information is also provided as a customized layer file: B25078_AREA_UPPERVALUEQUARTILE.lyr where the table information is joined to the 2010 TRACTS_AREA census geography on the GEOID item. Both the table and customized lyr file name do not contain the year descriptor (i.e. 2012-2016) for the current ACS series. This is intentional in order to maintain the same table name in each successive ACS update. The alias of each item's (E)stimate and (M)easure of Error value stores this year date information as beginning YY and ending YY, i.e., 'E1216' and 'M1216' followed by the rest of the alias description. In this way users of the data tables or lyr files that support field aliases can determine which ACS series is being represented by the current table contents.

Measurement of network speed, specifically bandwidth, has long been used as a key performance indicator for home broadband. Not only has it become a tool for detecting and diagnosing poor performance, but also for making investment decisions and measuring the quality of experience. However, current tools employ traditional techniques that consider wired measurements as the most accurate. Unfortunately, home users rarely have the capability to conduct reliable wired tests, instead being only able to measure using Wi-Fi. In particular, home wireless is often viewed as an unreliable indicator of network speed, leaving home users with little recourse to challenge the quality of broadband speed that is actually delivered.

In this thesis, we investigate the extent to which Wi-Fi-based tests are actually unreliable, and more importantly, to understand if one can accurately determine if the result was indicative of broadband as a bottleneck or if the measurement was limited by Wi-Fi. We also examine whether the accuracy of the tool is determined by the congestion control algorithm (CCA) and robust against specific use cases.

The results demonstrate that such a determination is eminently possible regardless of the CCA, and that it can be done drawing only on the feature and groups of features already reported by iPerf. We show through extensive experiments that goodness (the test was indicative of broadband speeds) or badness (the test was not `indicative of broadband speeds) can be captured with a precision of 92.4%, drawing only the median throughput and interquartile range with second-by-second windowing reported by iPerf. Finally, we illustrate that the classifier is robust against cross-traffic.

The ranges of the plasma lactate quartiles were determined using specimens from the weighted random cohort sample.†Represents the maximum number of participants in each category. Actual number may vary due to missing data.‡Plasma lactate mg/dL may be converted to mmol/L by multiplying by 0.111.§P-trend evaluated with linear or logistic regression using the median lactate value for each quartile as an ordinal variable.∧There were no participants with coronary heart disease in quartile 1. SE not calculated due to small sample size.*Represents geometric mean and interquartile range.Note: LDL represents low density lipoprotein. HDL represents high density lipoprotein.

Annual descriptive price statistics for each calendar year 2005 – 2020 for 462 electoral wards within 11 Local Government Districts.

The statistics include:

• Minimum sale price

• Lower quartile sale price

• Median sale price

• Simple Mean sale price

• Upper Quartile sale price

• Maximum sale price

• Number of verified sales

Prices are available where at least 30 sales were recorded in the area within the calendar year which could be included in the regression model i.e. the following sales are excluded:

• Non Arms-Length sales

• sales of properties where the habitable space are less than 30m2 or greater than 1000m2

• sales less than £20,000.

Annual median or simple mean prices should not be used to calculate the property price change over time.
The quality (where quality refers to the combination of all characteristics of a residential property, both physical and locational) of the properties that are sold may differ from one time period to another. For example, sales in one quarter could be disproportionately skewed towards low-quality properties, therefore producing a biased estimate of average price. The median and simple mean prices are not ‘standardised’ and so the varying mix of properties sold in each quarter could give a false impression of the actual change in prices. In order to calculate the pure property price change over time it is necessary to compare like with like, and this can only be achieved if the ‘characteristics-mix’ of properties traded is standardised. To calculate pure property change over time please use the standardised prices in the NI House Price Index Detailed Statistics file.

We propose a novel use for polygenic risk scores (PRS). This will explore an observed epidemiological result that mothers with high BMI are more likely to have offspring with autism or developmental delays (from very large Scandinavian registry studies). 1) Determine quartiles of maternal PRS to define potential subgroups of inherited background risk 2) Then study de novo sequence variants in autistic probands of these mothers. Filter to include only sequence variants with likely functional consequences; aggregate these into gene pathways a. Can we see de novo pathways within these subsets because we have a more homogeneous subset? b. Do de novos interact with genetic background? (enhanced/suppressed effects) Genome- wide inherited polygenic risk and de novo variants may interact to produce outcomes 3) Determine what we would expect for de novo pathway enrichment using random selections of quartiles. Run de novo pathway enrichment on 10,000 random quartiles. Correct for multiple testing. Remove pathways with significant enrichment in 10,000 random quartiles. 4) Remove de novo pathways enriched in other quartiles, as follows: a. Lowest quartile of maternal PRS for BMI (tests specificity of HIGH maternal BMI rather than an overall maternal metabolic risk) b. High quartile for proband PRS for BMI (tests that this is a parental effect rather then an effect of background BMI polygenic risk just within the progand) c. High quartile for paternal PRS for BMI (tests this is specifically a maternal effect) d. Enrichment in siblings of high quartile BMI moms (test specificity for autism outcome) Practical considerations e. PRS subsets must be large enough to allow us to see effects: hence the choice of quartiles f. De Novos must be aggregated into pathways because single variants would be too rare to detect enrichment

Apply to Simons Simplex Collection families. Replicate in other Simons cohorts (requires either whole genome sequence, or genome-wide array data plus exome sequence data; requires mom, dad, proband, sib).

Additional File 8: Table 7. Genes with increasing expression from ECs to FSCs and/or FSCs to FCs. Average normalized expression value for each cluster is listed in columns I-N for each groupand weighted values used to calculate expression among ECsand FCs. Fractional changes relative to the larger number were calculated for transitions from ECs to FSCs, FSCs to FCs, group 5 to group 1and group 1 to group 4. The resulting values in those four columns were classified into quartiles, with the first quartile colored dark brown for an increase or dark blue for a decrease, the second quartile colored light brown for an increase or light blue for a decrease, and the third quartile colored very light brown for an increase or very light blue for a decrease. Gene order was determined according to quartiles, first prioritizing genes that increased for both transitions, then genes increased only for the EC to FSC transition, listing first quartile genes first in each group. Horizontal green lines separate different categories and gene numbering begins at 1 for each category. Additional File 5: Table 4 lists all genes with latter columns in the same format as in this spreadsheet, regardless of the magnitude of changes from ECs to FSCs or FSCs to FCs.

Administrative disposable income is a third pillar of the income statistics that Statbel publishes, alongside "\2" and poverty indicators based on "\2", and allows answering other types of questions than SILC and tax statistics.

SILC uses "\2" at the household level as a concept of income, cumulating the incomes of all household members. In the next step, this disposable income is converted into equivalised disposable income to take into account the composition of the household. Based on the SILC, at-risk-of-poverty figures are published up to the provincial level. However, the sample size does not allow for analyses at a more detailed geographical level. However, statistics based on tax revenues are available up to the level of the statistical sector, but are limited to taxable income in the context of personal income tax returns. Non-taxable income is not taken into account and there is also no correction according to the composition of the household.

The variable "administrative equivalised disposable income" responds to a growing demand for income and poverty figures at the communal level. It uses an income concept based on administrative sources that tries to correspond as much as possible to that of SILC. For the population as a whole, both taxable and non-taxable income are taken into account. They are added together for all members of the household in order to obtain an administrative disposable income for the household. After adjusting for the composition of the household, the variable "administrative equivalised disposable income" is established. This can be used to calculate income and poverty figures at the communal level.

Indicators are not disseminated for an entity and a category when there are at least 15% of people whose equivalent administrative disposable income is missing or when there are less than 100 people with a valid income.

More information on the page "\2" of Statbel

Updated for 2013-17: US Census American Community Survey data table for: Housing subject area. Provides information about: UPPER CONTRACT RENT QUARTILE (DOLLARS) for the universe of: Renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent. These data are extrapolated estimates only, based on sampling; they are not actual complete counts. The data is based on 2010 Census Tracts. Table ACS_B25059_UPPERCONTRACTRENTQUARTILE contains both the Estimate value in the E item for the census topic and an adjacent M item which defines the Margin of Error for the value. The Margin of Error (MOE) is the plus/minus range for the item estimate value, where the range between the Estimate minus the Margin of Error and the Estimate plus the Margin of Error defines the 90% confidence interval of the item value. Many of the Margin of Error values are significant relative to the size of the Estimate value. This table contains 1 item(s) extracted from a larger sequence table. This extracted subset represents that portion of the sequence that is considered high priority. Other portions of this sequence that are not included can be identified in the data dictionary information provided in the Supplemental Information section below. This table information is also provided as a customized layer file: B25059_AREA_UPPERCONTRACTRENTQUARTILE.lyr where the table information is joined to the 2010 TRACTS_AREA census geography on the GEOID item. Both the table and customized lyr file name do not contain the year descriptor (i.e. 2012-2016) for the current ACS series. This is intentional in order to maintain the same table name in each successive ACS update. The alias of each item's (E)stimate and (M)easure of Error value stores this year date information as beginning YY and ending YY, i.e., 'E1216' and 'M1216' followed by the rest of the alias description. In this way users of the data tables or lyr files that support field aliases can determine which ACS series is being represented by the current table contents.

Administrative disposable income is a third pillar of the income statistics that Statbel publishes, alongside "\2" and poverty indicators based on "\2", and allows answering other types of questions than SILC and tax statistics.

SILC uses "\2" at the household level as a concept of income, cumulating the incomes of all household members. In the next step, this disposable income is converted into equivalised disposable income to take into account the composition of the household. Based on the SILC, at-risk-of-poverty figures are published up to the provincial level. However, the sample size does not allow for analyses at a more detailed geographical level. However, statistics based on tax revenues are available up to the level of the statistical sector, but are limited to taxable income in the context of personal income tax returns. Non-taxable income is not taken into account and there is also no correction according to the composition of the household.

The variable "administrative equivalised disposable income" responds to a growing demand for income and poverty figures at the communal level. It uses an income concept based on administrative sources that tries to correspond as much as possible to that of SILC. For the population as a whole, both taxable and non-taxable income are taken into account. They are added together for all members of the household in order to obtain an administrative disposable income for the household. After adjusting for the composition of the household, the variable "administrative equivalised disposable income" is established. This can be used to calculate income and poverty figures at the communal level.

Indicators are not disseminated for an entity and a category when there are at least 15% of people whose equivalent administrative disposable income is missing or when there are less than 100 people with a valid income.

More information on the page "\2" of Statbel

Administrative disposable income is a third pillar of the income statistics that Statbel publishes, alongside "\2" and poverty indicators based on "\2", and allows answering other types of questions than SILC and tax statistics.

SILC uses "\2" at the household level as a concept of income, cumulating the incomes of all household members. In the next step, this disposable income is converted into equivalised disposable income to take into account the composition of the household. Based on the SILC, at-risk-of-poverty figures are published up to the provincial level. However, the sample size does not allow for analyses at a more detailed geographical level. However, statistics based on tax revenues are available up to the level of the statistical sector, but are limited to taxable income in the context of personal income tax returns. Non-taxable income is not taken into account and there is also no correction according to the composition of the household.

The variable "administrative equivalised disposable income" responds to a growing demand for income and poverty figures at the communal level. It uses an income concept based on administrative sources that tries to correspond as much as possible to that of SILC. For the population as a whole, both taxable and non-taxable income are taken into account. They are added together for all members of the household in order to obtain an administrative disposable income for the household. After adjusting for the composition of the household, the variable "administrative equivalised disposable income" is established. This can be used to calculate income and poverty figures at the communal level.

Indicators are not disseminated for an entity and a category when there are at least 15% of people whose equivalent administrative disposable income is missing or when there are less than 100 people with a valid income.

More information on the page "\2" of Statbel

Annual descriptive price statistics for each calendar year 2005 – 2023 for 11 Local Government Districts in Northern Ireland. The statistics include: • Minimum sale price • Lower quartile sale price • Median sale price • Simple Mean sale price • Upper Quartile sale price • Maximum sale price • Number of verified sales Prices are available where at least 30 sales were recorded in the area within the calendar year which could be included in the regression model i.e. the following sales are excluded: • Non Arms-Length sales • sales of properties where the habitable space are less than 30m2 or greater than 1000m2 • sales less than £20,000. Annual median or simple mean prices should not be used to calculate the property price change over time. The quality (where quality refers to the combination of all characteristics of a residential property, both physical and locational) of the properties that are sold may differ from one time period to another. For example, sales in one quarter could be disproportionately skewed towards low-quality properties, therefore producing a biased estimate of average price. The median and simple mean prices are not ‘standardised’ and so the varying mix of properties sold in each quarter could give a false impression of the actual change in prices. In order to calculate the pure property price change over time it is necessary to compare like with like, and this can only be achieved if the ‘characteristics-mix’ of properties traded is standardised. To calculate pure property change over time please use the standardised prices in the NI House Price Index Detailed Statistics file.

Note: In these datasets, a person is defined as up to date if they have received at least one dose of an updated COVID-19 vaccine. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that certain groups, including adults ages 65 years and older, receive additional doses.

Starting on July 13, 2022, the denominator for calculating vaccine coverage has been changed from age 5+ to all ages to reflect new vaccine eligibility criteria. Previously the denominator was changed from age 16+ to age 12+ on May 18, 2021, then changed from age 12+ to age 5+ on November 10, 2021, to reflect previous changes in vaccine eligibility criteria. The previous datasets based on age 12+ and age 5+ denominators have been uploaded as archived tables.

Starting June 30, 2021, the dataset has been reconfigured so that all updates are appended to one dataset to make it easier for API and other interfaces. In addition, historical data has been extended back to January 5, 2021.

This dataset shows full, partial, and at least 1 dose coverage rates by zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) for the state of California. Data sources include the California Immunization Registry and the American Community Survey’s 2015-2019 5-Year data.

This is the data table for the LHJ Vaccine Equity Performance dashboard. However, this data table also includes ZTCAs that do not have a VEM score.

This dataset also includes Vaccine Equity Metric score quartiles (when applicable), which combine the Public Health Alliance of Southern California’s Healthy Places Index (HPI) measure with CDPH-derived scores to estimate factors that impact health, like income, education, and access to health care. ZTCAs range from less healthy community conditions in Quartile 1 to more healthy community conditions in Quartile 4.

The Vaccine Equity Metric is for weekly vaccination allocation and reporting purposes only. CDPH-derived quartiles should not be considered as indicative of the HPI score for these zip codes. CDPH-derived quartiles were assigned to zip codes excluded from the HPI score produced by the Public Health Alliance of Southern California due to concerns with statistical reliability and validity in populations smaller than 1,500 or where more than 50% of the population resides in a group setting.

These data do not include doses administered by the following federal agencies who received vaccine allocated directly from CDC: Indian Health Service, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Defense, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

For some ZTCAs, vaccination coverage may exceed 100%. This may be a result of many people from outside the county coming to that ZTCA to get their vaccine and providers reporting the county of administration as the county of residence, and/or the DOF estimates of the population in that ZTCA are too low. Please note that population numbers provided by DOF are projections and so may not be accurate, especially given unprecedented shifts in population as a result of the pandemic.

This dataset presents information from 2016 at the household level; the percentage of households within each Index of Household Advantage and Disadvantage (IHAD) quartile for Local Government Area (LGA) 2017 boundaries.

The IHAD is an experimental analytical index developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that provides a summary measure of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage for households. It utilises information from the 2016 Census of Population and Housing.

IHAD quartiles: All households are ordered from lowest to highest disadvantage, the lowest 25% of households are given a quartile number of 1, the next lowest 25% of households are given a quartile number of 2 and so on, up to the highest 25% of households which are given a quartile number of 4. This means that households are divided up into four groups, depending on their score.

This data is ABS data (catalogue number: 4198.0) used with permission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

For more information please visit the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Please note:

• AURIN has generated this dataset through aggregating the original SA1 level data (with calculated number of households/quartile) to LGA level.

• Aggregation was achieved through calculating the centroid for each SA1 and assigning it to the LGA it fell within.

• The number of occupied private dwellings, and number of households in each of the IHAD quartiles were calculated for each LGA by aggregating the peviously assigned SA1 values of each of those specified columns from the SA1 dataset. Percentages of households in each of the IHAD quartiles were calculated for each LGA from these aggregated totals.

• A household is defined as one or more persons, at least one of whom is at least 15 years of age, usually resident in the same private dwelling. All occupants of a dwelling form a household. For Census purposes, the total number of households is equal to the total number of occupied private dwellings (Census of Population and Housing: Census Dictionary, 2016 cat. no. 2901.0).

• IHAD output has been confidentialised to meet ABS requirements. In line with standard ABS procedures to minimise the risk of identifying individuals, a technique has been applied to randomly adjust cell values of the output tables. These adjustments may cause the sum of rows or columns to differ by small amounts from table totals.

This table shows the average House Price/Earnings ratio, which is an important indicator of housing affordability. Ratios are calculated by dividing house price by the median earnings of a borough.

The Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) is based on a 1 per cent sample of employee jobs. Information on earnings and hours is obtained in confidence from employers. It does not cover the self-employed nor does it cover employees not paid during the reference period. Information is as at April each year. The statistics used are workplace based full-time individual earnings.

Pre-2013 Land Registry housing data are for the first half of the year only, so that they are comparable to the ASHE data which are as at April. This is no longer the case from 2013 onwards as this data uses house price data from the ONS House Price Statistics for Small Areas statistical release. Prior to 2006 data are not available for Inner and Outer London.

The lowest 25 per cent of prices are below the lower quartile; the highest 75 per cent are above the lower quartile.
The "lower quartile" property price/income is determined by ranking all property prices/incomes in ascending order.
The 'median' property price/income is determined by ranking all property prices/incomes in ascending order. The point at which one half of the values are above and one half are below is the median.

Regional data has not been published by DCLG since 2012. Data for regions has been calculated by the GLA. Data since 2014 has been calculated by the GLA using Land Registry house prices and ONS Earnings data.

Link to DCLG Live Tables

An interactive map showing the affordability ratios by local authority for 2013, 2014 and 2015 is also available.

Context

Our target was to predict gender, age and emotion from audio. We found audio labeled datasets on Mozilla and RAVDESS. So by using R programming language 20 statistical features were extracted and then after adding the labels these datasets were formed. Audio files were collected from "Mozilla Common Voice" and “Ryerson AudioVisual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS)”.

Content

Datasets contains 20 feature columns and 1 column for denoting the label. The 20 statistical features were extracted through the Frequency Spectrum Analysis using R programming Language. They are: 1) meanfreq - The mean frequency (in kHz) is a pitch measure, that assesses the center of the distribution of power across frequencies. 2) sd - The standard deviation of frequency is a statistical measure that describes a dataset’s dispersion relative to its mean and is calculated as the variance’s square root. 3) median - The median frequency (in kHz) is the middle number in the sorted, ascending, or descending list of numbers. 4) Q25 - The first quartile (in kHz), referred to as Q1, is the median of the lower half of the data set. This means that about 25 percent of the data set numbers are below Q1, and about 75 percent are above Q1. 5) Q75 - The third quartile (in kHz), referred to as Q3, is the central point between the median and the highest distributions. 6) IQR - The interquartile range (in kHz) is a measure of statistical dispersion, equal to the difference between 75th and 25th percentiles or between upper and lower quartiles. 7) skew - The skewness is the degree of distortion from the normal distribution. It measures the lack of symmetry in the data distribution. 8) kurt - The kurtosis is a statistical measure that determines how much the tails of distribution vary from the tails of a normal distribution. It is actually the measure of outliers present in the data distribution. 9) sp.ent - The spectral entropy is a measure of signal irregularity that sums up the normalized signal’s spectral power. 10) sfm - The spectral flatness or tonality coefficient, also known as Wiener entropy, is a measure used for digital signal processing to characterize an audio spectrum. Spectral flatness is usually measured in decibels, which, instead of being noise-like, offers a way to calculate how tone-like a sound is. 11) mode - The mode frequency is the most frequently observed value in a data set. 12) centroid - The spectral centroid is a metric used to describe a spectrum in digital signal processing. It means where the spectrum’s center of mass is centered. 13) meanfun - The meanfun is the average of the fundamental frequency measured across the acoustic signal. 14) minfun - The minfun is the minimum fundamental frequency measured across the acoustic signal 15) maxfun - The maxfun is the maximum fundamental frequency measured across the acoustic signal. 16) meandom - The meandom is the average of dominant frequency measured across the acoustic signal. 17) mindom - The mindom is the minimum of dominant frequency measured across the acoustic signal. 18) maxdom - The maxdom is the maximum of dominant frequency measured across the acoustic signal 19) dfrange - The dfrange is the range of dominant frequency measured across the acoustic signal. 20) modindx - the modindx is the modulation index, which calculates the degree of frequency modulation expressed numerically as the ratio of the frequency deviation to the frequency of the modulating signal for a pure tone modulation.

Acknowledgements

Gender and Age Audio Data Souce: Link: https://commonvoice.mozilla.org/en Emotion Audio Data Souce: Link : https://smartlaboratory.org/ravdess/

This table summarizes the income of people in the Caribbean Netherlands; the islands of Bonaire, St. Eustatius, and Saba. Persons are differentiated according to sex, age, socio-economic category, position in the household and income level. The income level quartile groups are determined per island, since the income differences between the islands make a classification for the Caribbean Netherlands as a total difficult to interpret.

Population: The population consists of the people in private households with income observed. The reference date is December 31 of the year under review.

Data is available starting from 2011.

Status of the figures: The figures for the years 2011 to 2015 are final. The figures for 2016 are provisional.

Changes March 15, 2019 The underlying coding of classifications (Sex, Caribbean Netherlands, Characteristics) used in this table has been adjusted. It is now in line with the standard encoding defined by CBS. The structure and data of the table have not been adjusted.

Changes July 16, 2018 The provisional figures for 2016 have been added. The figures for 2015 are finalized.

Changes September 29, 2017: The figures for the income quartiles for the Caribbean Netherlands as total were abusively presented for the years 2011 to 2014. The provisional figures for 2015 have been added. The figures for 2014 are finalized.

If there are new figures? New figures are expected in September 2019.

Consolidated tax declaration and determination should be filed with a 2D barcode for the number of taxpayers who should pay and receive refunds, and the amount of money in the 5 percentile statistical table for declaration. Unit: Amount (thousand yuan)

Number of minutes logged on during the rotation period and the probability of being in better grades quartiles.

These data are used to position a company’s financial ratios to a cohort of similar firms, based on a comparison by industry, turnover and year of year. Each line of this data source allows you to consult the percentiles of each sector ratio, calculated on a cohort of selected balance sheets (50 minimum) based on their sector of activity, turnover and year of year. The distribution of percentiles is carried out on a sample sorted in ascending order. The percentiles are calculated using a continuous percentile method, following a linear regression (see PostgreSQL percentile_cont method). The values q10/q25/q50/q75/q90 mean the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th percentiles of the distribution: - Q10 represents the value below which is 10 % of the data. If this value does not exist exactly in the data, it will be determined by linear interpolation. - Q25, or the first quartile, represents the value below which is 25 % of the data. - Q50, or median, is the value that divides the data into two equal halves, i.e. 50 % of the data is less than this value. - Q75, or the third quartile, is the value below which is 75 % of the data. - Q90 is the value below which is 90 % of the data. Sectoral ratios from INPI/ECB financial indicators