Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Odds ratios of being digitally excluded by various characteristics in January to March 2020, using data from the Labour Force Survey with geographical coverage of the UK.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This study challenges the current ‘utopian’ discourse in digital inclusion rhetoric by providing insights into the complexity of digital inclusion initiative provision as a multilevel phenomenon, against a backdrop of digitalisation and digital-by-default policy. The aim of this study is to investigate digital inclusion initiative provision in the context of UK rural communities. Underpinned by the philosophy of critical realism, the study employs an exploratory qualitative case study that provides a critical discussion of digital inclusion initiative provision and a granular analysis of the dynamics, processes, experiences, and behaviours of those involved in the phenomenon. More specifically the study explores digital inclusion initiative provision from a multilevel perspective, from digital inclusion stakeholders that operate nationally across the UK; intermediaries delivering digital inclusion training and support in three specific rural regions of the UK with populations at increased risk of digital exclusion; and individuals who have received digital inclusion support within those three specific rural locations. Data collection involved semi-structured interviews, focus groups, observations, complemented by a brief document review. Activity Theory was utilised as an analytical framework to provide guidance from data collection through to empirical data analysis to help investigate digital inclusion initiative provision as a multilevel phenomenon. Key findings reveal digital inclusion initiative provision is a complicated process that is fraught with challenges and contradictions, that hamper the realisation of the digital inclusion agenda. Digital inclusion training and support is provided to individuals from ‘all walks of life’, not just the digitally excluded, and not everyone has beneficial outcomes. Importantly, the study reveals the bridging role of human intermediation, and the need for rural communities to be considered in UK government digital policy. Contributions of this study include new insights into the understanding digital inclusion initiative provision and the inherent challenges in that process, the usefulness of Activity Theory to help unravel the complexity of digital inclusion initiatives as a multilevel phenomenon; and recommendations for change in the provision of digital inclusion initiatives that have implications for policy and practice.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundThe covid-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of digital tools within health and social care services. However, for a range of different reasons, across the UK there continue to be people who are digitally excluded. People living with a disability have been identified as being more likely to be digitally excluded and many of these people, including people with severe mental illness (SMI) already experience health inequalities. Therefore, understanding the perceived impact digital exclusion has on health and potential facilitators of increased inclusion is an important area for research. This study had two aims: 1. To understand experiences of digital exclusion and the impact on health in people with SMI. 2. To explore the influences and mechanisms which would increase engagement with digital health tools.MethodsThis was an observational qualitative study, conducting focus groups (with the option of a 1:1 interview for those uncomfortable in groups) with nine people with severe mental illness.ResultsParticipant’s responses were themed in to four key areas in relation to digital exclusion and impact on health: 1. Reduced social connectedness, 2. The impact on wider determinants of health 3. Negative perception of self, 4. Disempowerment. Key facilitators for increased engagement with digital tools included, local digital skills support with mental health lived experience involvement in the delivery, digitally engaged social referents, access to digital tools and data, personalised and straightforward digital tools. In addition, increasing health and social care staff’s awareness of digital exclusion was also viewed as important in promoting inclusion.ConclusionThe research findings suggest that digital inclusion should be viewed as a wider determinant of health. Many of the identified consequences of exclusion are particularly important in relation to mental health and mental health recovery. This research suggests that identifying and addressing digital exclusion should be viewed as a priority for mental health services.
In today’s interconnected world, internet access is often considered critical for accessing work. However, reliance on the internet also poses challenges for some disabled people, who may be vulnerable to digital exclusion. This innovative project delivered by an interprofessional team of social scientists, voluntary sector organisations, vocational rehabilitation practitioners, disability researchers, disabled people, and digital engagement specialists examined digital inclusion of disabled adults in voluntary work.
The project aimed to: (1) advance understanding of how digital inclusion of disabled individuals fosters social inclusion in online and offline voluntary work; and (2) identify effective principles to boost participation, inclusivity, and leverage the potential of digital technologies in the voluntary sector organisations.
A mixed-methods approach is adopted for a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem. This included qualitative interviews and analysis that will provide deeper understanding and explanations for these patterns through analysis of the lived experiences of disabled adults and survey data analysis.
The key findings included: • Link Between Digital Inclusion and Volunteering: For disabled adults, being included in online and offline volunteering depends on how well they can access and use digital technology in general. The same devices, technologies, social support, and skills used in employment and other areas of life are often applied to volunteering. Because disabled adults often have less access to devices and the internet and use them less than non-disabled adults, they are more likely to miss out on volunteering opportunities that require it. • Digital Access and Divide: Most disabled adults in the UK are connected digitally, but the digital divide persists. Disabled adults face greater digital challenges and exclusion compared to non-disabled adults, with the disability digital gap remaining largely unchanged since 2018. • Digital exclusion: Nearly one million disabled adults don’t have Internet at home, 1.4 million don’t use the Internet, and about two million don’t own a smartphone or computer. • Frequency of Use and Online Exclusion: Disabled adults use the Internet less often than non-disabled adults and they are more likely to be left out of common online activities like browsing, emailing, social media, online banking, and streaming videos. • Double Disadvantage and Additional Challenges: Disabled people often come from groups that with already more limited access to the Internet and devices, such as older adults, those with low incomes, benefit recipients, renters from local authorities, people with less education and those living alone. On top of these existing barriers, being disabled means facing even more difficulties in accessing and using digital technology. • Individual Nature of Disability Experience with Digital Tools: Disabled adults’ experiences with digital tools are highly individual, shaped by factors such as impairment type, severity, presence of multiple impairments, and their social context. • Double-Edged Sword of Digital Technology and Online Volunteering: Digital technology is crucial for inclusion but can also be source of exclusion for those struggling with technology. Disabled adults are more inclined to engage in online volunteering, because of its accessibility. However, online volunteering also presents challenges that may deter some disabled volunteers. Despite some digital barriers, disabled adults show higher interest in online volunteering compared to non-disabled adults. • Importance of Internet Access for Engaging in Volunteering: Internet access and usage are crucial for enabling disabled individuals to engage in volunteering, including both online and in-person opportunities. Those who use the Internet more frequently are more likely to volunteer, even after considering their socioeconomic background. • Internet Access, Use, Devices and Volunteering Hours and Frequency: For disabled individuals, owning devices does not affect the number of volunteer hours. More frequent Internet use is linked to volunteering more hours, with exception of frequent Internet users (daily or weekly) who volunteer fewer hours. Device ownership and Internet use do not impact the frequency of volunteering. • Digital Barriers and Enablers of Volunteering: o Technology over-reliance: Over-reliance on technology can complicate volunteer journeys, especially when IT systems or support is unavailable or inadequate. o Technological assumptions: Organisations often assume people understand how to use technology and devices and may not recognise the need for support or training. o Variation in suitability of assistive devices: The effectiveness of assistive devices can facilitate or hinder participation, depending on their suitability and the level of support provided. Malfunctioning or unsuitable assistive devices can exacerbate challenges for disabled individuals. Disabled adults can experience a mismatched between requirements and devices available or provided that can lead to exclusion form volunteering opportunities. o Reliance of support networks: To be effective, use of assistive devices draws on the skills and experience of informal support networks. Organisations should remain attuned to prioritising supporting people rather than supporting technology. o Organisational culture: Organisations should encourage a culture of listening and providing empathetic support to address the specific needs of disabled volunteers and reduce digital barriers to volunteering. Support structures should be inclusive and allow volunteers to discuss their needs, ensuring parity with paid staff support. • Volunteering and Employment: Our findings suggest that, rather than volunteering serving as a direct path to paid work, employment helps disabled individuals overcome digital barriers to volunteering. The confidence, skills and resources acquired through paid employment, as well as the social capital that often comes from being part of being a part of more diverse networks that includes work colleagues as well as more personal relationships, means that those in employment might be better able to navigate some of the barriers to securing volunteering roles. Such resources are less easily initiated in volunteer roles - we heard frustrations that the Access to Work scheme, which supports paid employment, does not cover voluntary work. • Discrimination and Volunteering. Disabled people continue to experience indirect and direct discrimination. For some, the lack of appropriate devices, limited training, and organisational cultures that make people reluctant to seek support all imply a level of discrimination that makes it difficult for those in volunteering roles to always excel. Such discrimination was not always so indirect. There is evidence to indicate that those who have been in successful volunteering positions for some time suggested they are being denied employment opportunities because they are disabled.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
File built in order to explore access to banking channels in the UK (February 2019)
The report "Exploratory Spatial Analysis of Access to Physical and Digital Retail Banking Channels in the UK" has been published by Think Forward Initiative in October 2019. You can download the full report from here: https://www.thinkforwardinitiative.com/research/exploratory-spatial-analysis-of-access-to-physical-and-digital-retail-banking-channels-in-the-uk
Related code: andrasonea/TFI_AccessToBanking
This statistic shows the share of digital tech investments in regional clusters in the United Kingdom (UK) excluding London, from 2012 till 2016. ** percent of the total UK digital tech investments were in regions beyond London in 2016.
In June 2023, GVA of reported DCMS sectors increased at a greater rate than the UK as a whole. GVA of the included DCMS Sectors grew by around 1.0% compared to May 2023, while the UK as a whole grew by 0.5%. This followed a 0.1% estimated growth in DCMS Sectors in April (up 0.2% in the whole UK economy) and a 0.9% estimated increase in May (0.1% decrease for the whole UK economy).
GVA of reported DCMS Sectors (excluding Tourism) in June 2023 was 10% above February 2020 levels, which was the most recent month prior to pandemic measures being introduced in the UK. By comparison, GVA for the whole UK economy was 0.8% higher than in February 2020.
In June 2023, Digital Sector GVA grew by around 1% from May 2023, while GVA for the UK economy grew by less (0.5%). This increase followed a 0.9% increase for the Digital Sector in April (up 0.2% for the whole UK economy) and a 0.2% estimated increase in May (0.1% decrease for the whole UK economy).
GVA by the Digital Sector in March 2023 was 15% above February 2020 levels, which was the most recent month prior to pandemic measures being introduced in the UK. By comparison, GVA for the whole UK economy was 0.8% higher than in February 2020.
16 August 2023
The DCMS Sector total reported here includes Civil Society, Creative Industries, Cultural Sector, Gambling and Sport. Tourism is not included as the data is not yet available (see note in data table). Figures for the Digital Sector and Telecoms are presented separately as responsibility for these policy areas now sits with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.
These Economic Estimates are Official Statistics used to provide an estimate of the economic contribution of DCMS Sectors, and of the Digital Sector, in terms of gross value added (GVA), for the period January 2019 to June 2023. This current release contains new figures for April to June 2023.
Estimates are in chained volume measures (i.e. have been adjusted for inflation), at 2019 prices, and are seasonally adjusted. These latest monthly estimates should only be used to illustrate general trends, not used as definitive figures.
You can use these estimates to:
You should not use these estimates to:
The findings are calculated based on published ONS data sources including the Index of Services and Index of Production.
These data sources provide an estimate of the monthly change in GVA for all UK industries. However, the data is only available for broader industry groups, whereas DCMS sectors, and the Digital Sector, are respectively defined at a more detailed industrial level. For example, GVA for ‘Cultural education’ (a sub-sector of the Cultural Sector within the DCMS Sectors) is estimated based on the trend for all education. Sectors such as ‘Cultural education’ may have been affected differently by COVID-19 compared to education in general. These estimates are also based on the composition of the economy in 2019. Overall, this means the accuracy of monthly GVA for DCMS sectors is likely to be lower for months in 2020 and 2021.
The technical guidance contains further information about data sources, methodology, and the validation and accuracy of these estimates. The latest version of this guidance was published in November 2022. The only significant change since then is that figures for the Digital Sector and Telecoms are now presented separately as responsibility for these policy areas now sits with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.
These statistics cover the contributions of the following sectors to the UK economy.
Users should note that there is overlap between DCMS sector definitions
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A table to download the data will be made available on: http://research.mlabs.org.uk/blog/data-poverty/ .
https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
UK, India, and Mexico EdTech Market size was valued at USD 23,669.18 Million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 83,500.42 Million by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 17.45% from 2024 to 2031.
UK, India, and Mexico EdTech Market Drivers
Rising Education Expenditure: Governments in these countries are investing more in education, leading to increased spending on EdTech solutions [1, 2, 3]. Growing Internet Penetration: The widespread availability and affordability of internet access are enabling online learning and digital education resources [2, 4]. Demand for Personalized Learning: EdTech solutions offer personalized learning experiences tailored to individual student needs, improving learning outcomes [3, 5].
UK, India, and Mexico EdTech Market Restraints
Digital Divide: Unequal access to technology and the internet can limit the reach of EdTech solutions, particularly in rural areas [1, 3]. Teacher Training and Adoption: Ensuring teachers are equipped with the skills to effectively use EdTech tools can be a challenge [2, 4].
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
IntroductionThis paper aims to theoretically and empirically investigate the concept of digital capital in the Italian context. Digital Capital can be conceived as independent individual capital whose lack within a population can be a cause of digital inequality. Our paper draws from recent works that have measured the Digital Capital as a combination of digital access and digital competences, and have tested this operational definition through an online survey on a UK sample. The results of such research proved the construct validity of the operational definition, thus showing that Digital Capital could be empirically measured. However, a measurement model needs to be tested and validated over time and in different socio-cultural contexts in order to be refined and strengthened, and eventually disseminated on a large scale.MethodThis is the reason why this paper will show the results of a funded research project (named DigiCapItaly) carried out to test the validity of the Digital Capital measure in a different country, i.e., Italy. The data were collected with an online survey using a representative sample (by age, gender and geographical area) of individuals living in Italy aged 18 years or more. The creation of a composite index to measure Digital Capital followed a two-stage Principal Component Analysis approach.ResultsFirst, the paper provides a methodological framework for facing challenges and pitfalls in operationalizing and assessing a complex concept in social research. Secondly, results show that Digital Capital operational definition works in Italy as well as in the UK, thus legitimizing its recognition as an independent capital.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Innovation Labs in cultural heritage institutions emerged in the last years as specialized units which help researchers, artists, entrepreneurs, educators, innovators and any interested citizens and communities to use digital collections in innovative ways. These labs answer two major needs, helping discovery in vast digital collections, and applying new analytic/visualization tools by a wider user base, a process which stirs creative use and reuse of collections and innovation.Most active innovation labs are located in Europe and North America.This dataset was compiled using published reports on innovation labs and internet sources from the public domain between May 2019 and July 2019 by Fidelity Phiri, a visiting researcher at UCL Qatar for projects coordinated by Dr Milena Dobreva. The dataset helps to understand the cultural heritage innovation labs landscape in Africa. While at the time of publishing (20 August 2020) there are no active innovation labs in cultural heritage institutions, one library (Bibliotheca Alexandrina, Egypt) and one museum (Livingstone museum, Zambia) are planning to open such labs. Within this specific setting, the research on Africa aimed to identify stakeholders which can support the setting of innovation labs in cultural heritage institutions. Innovation centres, business incubators and fablabs can play such a role. The rationale for including these institutions is that they could be instrumental for setting up cultural heritage labs on a continent where more work is needed to overcome the digital divide.This map illustrates the dataset. https://www.mapcustomizer.com/map/Innovation labs in Africa
This statistic presents the usage of MP3 /MP4 digital music/digital video players (excluding mobile phones) in Great Britain from 2013 to 2017, by product feature. In 2017, an estimated 3.3 million people used the radio feature.
Satellite Internet Market Size 2025-2029
The satellite internet market size is forecast to increase by USD 7.61 billion at a CAGR of 19.7% between 2024 and 2029.
The market is experiencing significant growth driven by the increasing number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and the ongoing deployment of 5G networks. The proliferation of IoT devices is expanding the scope of connectivity beyond traditional terrestrial networks, creating a demand for satellite internet solutions in remote and hard-to-reach areas. Furthermore, the integration of satellite internet with 5G networks is enabling seamless connectivity and enhancing the overall performance of these systems. However, the market is not without challenges. Weather conditions, particularly heavy rain and snow, can significantly impact satellite signal quality and disrupt service. To mitigate this issue, companies are investing in advanced technologies such as adaptive modulation and error correction to improve satellite internet reliability in adverse weather conditions. These investments, along with ongoing technological advancements, present opportunities for companies to capitalize on the growing demand for satellite internet and navigate the challenges effectively. Companies seeking to capitalize on these opportunities should focus on developing and reliable satellite internet solutions, while also addressing the impact of weather conditions on their services.
What will be the Size of the Satellite Internet Market during the forecast period?
Request Free SampleThe market encompasses the provision of high-speed connection networks through geostationary satellites, addressing the global connectivity needs of various industries and communities. This market continues to expand, driven by the digital divide and the growing demand for reliable communication capabilities in remote and underserved areas. With increasing bandwidth capabilities, satellite internet is becoming a viable alternative for businesses and individuals in regions with infrastructure challenges. The market is witnessing significant activity, with satellite operators investing in network management systems and international coordination to enhance service delivery. The satellite communication industry is also responding to the evolving needs of sectors such as education, healthcare, economic development, and social inclusion. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, including the impact of natural disasters on satellite infrastructure and the ongoing efforts to improve affordability and accessibility. Overall, the market is poised for continued growth, offering valuable solutions for enhancing global communication and connectivity.
How is this Satellite Internet Industry segmented?
The satellite internet industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. TypeK-bandX-bandL-bandC-bandEnd-userCommercialNon-commercialGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeFranceGermanyRussiaUKAPACChinaIndiaJapanSouth AmericaBrazilMiddle East and Africa
By Type Insights
The k-band segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.The K-band segment leads The market due to its extensive usage in defense, broadcasting, and security applications. The adoption of K-band monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) technology, which facilitates the production of low-noise amplifiers and K-band power amplifiers at a large scale, with cost efficiency and high durability, is fueling market growth. K-band frequency is primarily utilized for wireless broadband access in remote locations, including local-multipoint distribution systems (LMDS), fixed satellites, and digital point-to-point radio services. This technology addresses the connectivity needs of underserved regions and contributes to bridging the digital divide. The advancements in satellite technology, such as high-capacity satellite constellations and bandwidth capabilities, further boost the market's expansion. Satellite infrastructure plays a crucial role in disaster management, emergency response scenarios, and the delivery of digital services like healthcare and education in remote areas. Ensuring seamless connectivity, high-speed network connectivity, and coverage range are essential factors driving the demand for satellite internet. Additionally, satellite telecommunications providers are continually enhancing their network management systems, international coordination, and service offerings to cater to the evolving needs of businesses and communities.
Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample
The K-band segment was valued at USD 919.00 billion in 2019 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.
R
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Odds ratios of being digitally excluded by various characteristics in January to March 2020, using data from the Labour Force Survey with geographical coverage of the UK.