100+ datasets found
  1. U.S. House of Representatives members 2001-2023, by race and ethnicity

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. House of Representatives members 2001-2023, by race and ethnicity [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198437/representatives-in-the-us-congress-by-ethnic-group-since-1975/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    There are 435 members of the House of Representatives in any congressional sitting. In the 118th Congress which began in January 2023, there were 58 Black members, 16 Asian American members, 54 Hispanic members.

  2. U.S. Congress monthly public approval rating 2022-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. Congress monthly public approval rating 2022-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/207579/public-approval-rating-of-the-us-congress/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Dec 2022 - Dec 2024
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The most recent polling data from February 2025 puts the approval rating of the United States Congress at 29 percent, reflecting a significant increase from January. The approval rating remained low throughout the 118th Congress cycle, which began in January 2025. Congressional approval Congressional approval, particularly over the past few years, has not been high. Americans tend to see Congress as a group of ineffectual politicians who are out of touch with their constituents. The 118th Congress began in 2023 with a rocky start. The Democratic Party maintains control of the Senate, but Republicans took back control of the House of Representatives after the 2022 midterm elections. The House caught media attention from its first days with a contentious fight for the position of Speaker of the House. Representative Kevin McCarthy was eventually sworn in as Speaker after a historic fifteen rounds of voting. Despite the current Congress having a historic share of women and being the most diverse Congress in American history, very little has been done to improve the opinion of Americans regarding its central lawmaking body. Ye of little faith However, Americans tend not to have much confidence in many of the institutions in the United States. Additionally, public confidence in the ability of the Republican and Democratic parties to work together has decreased drastically between 2008 and 2022, with nearly 60 percent of Americans having no confidence the parties can govern in a bipartisan way.

  3. d

    Replication Data for: Different Rules, Different Legislators?: Direct and...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 8, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sievert, Joel (2023). Replication Data for: Different Rules, Different Legislators?: Direct and Indirect Elections to the U.S. Congress [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256%3Ae11ee95b0f197b78544998bc114759bbf728bfe27f7df0791ed8f36f6329194a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Sievert, Joel
    Description

    I examine whether indirect and direct elections lead to the selection of different types of legislators. My research design, which compares senators to representatives who were elected from statewide districts, takes advantage of two unique features of the nineteenth century congressional districting process. First, some states elected their entire congressional delegation in at-large districts. Second, many states that gained a seat during reapportionment would elect the new representative in a statewide contest rather than redrawing district lines. As a result, there are not only more representatives elected statewide, but they also come from a more diverse set of states than in contemporary elections. Overall, I find that indirectly elected legislators were more comparable to directly elected legislators on some dimensions than prior studies suggest.

  4. U.S. Congressional members share of religion 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. Congressional members share of religion 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/952921/religious-affiliation-us-congress/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The U.S. Congress has become increasingly diverse over the years, though remains predominantly Protestant and Catholic. In 2023, 56.7 percent of Congress identified as Protestant, and 0.6 percent of Congress identified as Muslim.

  5. N

    Congress, OH Non-Hispanic Population Breakdown By Race Dataset: Non-Hispanic...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 21, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). Congress, OH Non-Hispanic Population Breakdown By Race Dataset: Non-Hispanic Population Counts and Percentages for 7 Racial Categories as Identified by the US Census Bureau // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/research/datasets/99d756ab-ef82-11ef-9e71-3860777c1fe6/
    Explore at:
    csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 21, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Congress
    Variables measured
    Non-Hispanic Asian Population, Non-Hispanic Black Population, Non-Hispanic White Population, Non-Hispanic Some other race Population, Non-Hispanic Two or more races Population, Non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native Population, Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Population, Non-Hispanic Asian Population as Percent of Total Non-Hispanic Population, Non-Hispanic Black Population as Percent of Total Non-Hispanic Population, Non-Hispanic White Population as Percent of Total Non-Hispanic Population, and 4 more
    Measurement technique
    The data presented in this dataset is derived from the latest U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. To measure the two variables, namely (a) Non-Hispanic population and (b) population as a percentage of the total Non-Hispanic population, we initially analyzed and categorized the data for each of the racial categories idetified by the US Census Bureau. It is ensured that the population estimates used in this dataset pertain exclusively to the identified racial categories, and are part of Non-Hispanic classification. For further information regarding these estimates, please feel free to reach out to us via email at research@neilsberg.com.
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    The dataset tabulates the Non-Hispanic population of Congress by race. It includes the distribution of the Non-Hispanic population of Congress across various race categories as identified by the Census Bureau. The dataset can be utilized to understand the Non-Hispanic population distribution of Congress across relevant racial categories.

    Key observations

    With a zero Hispanic population, Congress is 100% Non-Hispanic. Among the Non-Hispanic population, the largest racial group is White alone with a population of 83 (96.51% of the total Non-Hispanic population).

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

    Racial categories include:

    • White
    • Black or African American
    • American Indian and Alaska Native
    • Asian
    • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
    • Some other race
    • Two or more races (multiracial)

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Race: This column displays the racial categories (for Non-Hispanic) for the Congress
    • Population: The population of the racial category (for Non-Hispanic) in the Congress is shown in this column.
    • % of Total Population: This column displays the percentage distribution of each race as a proportion of Congress total Non-Hispanic population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

    Recommended for further research

    This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Congress Population by Race & Ethnicity. You can refer the same here

  6. 118th Congressional Districts

    • gisnation-sdi.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Feb 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets (2024). 118th Congressional Districts [Dataset]. https://gisnation-sdi.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/fedmaps::118th-congressional-districts
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Esri U.S. Federal Datasets
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Pacific Ocean, North Pacific Ocean
    Description

    This feature layer, utilizing National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) data from the U.S. Census Bureau (USCB), displays Districts of the 118th Congress. Per USCB, "Congressional districts are the 435 areas from which people are elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. After the apportionment of congressional seats among the states based on census population counts, each state is responsible for establishing congressional districts for the purpose of electing representatives. Each congressional district is to be as equal in population to all other congressional districts in a state as practicable."118th Congressional District 12Data currency: This cached Esri federal service is checked weekly for updates from its enterprise federal source (118th Congressional Districts) and will support mapping, analysis, data exports and OGC API – Feature access.NGDAID: 57 (Series Information for 118th Congressional District State-based TIGER/Line Shapefiles, Current)OGC API Features Link: (118th Congressional Districts) copy this link to embed it in OGC Compliant viewersFor more information, please visit: About Congressional DistrictsFor feedback, please contact: Esri_US_Federal_Data@esri.comNGDA Data SetThis data set is part of the NGDA Governmental Units, and Administrative and Statistical Boundaries Theme Community. Per the Federal Geospatial Data Committee (FGDC), this theme is defined as the "boundaries that delineate geographic areas for uses such as governance and the general provision of services (e.g., states, American Indian reservations, counties, cities, towns, etc.), administration and/or for a specific purpose (e.g., congressional districts, school districts, fire districts, Alaska Native Regional Corporations, etc.), and/or provision of statistical data (census tracts, census blocks, metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas, etc.). Boundaries for these various types of geographic areas are either defined through a documented legal description or through criteria and guidelines. Other boundaries may include international limits, those of federal land ownership, the extent of administrative regions for various federal agencies, as well as the jurisdictional offshore limits of U.S. sovereignty. Boundaries associated solely with natural resources and/or cultural entities are excluded from this theme and are included in the appropriate subject themes."For other NGDA Content: Esri Federal Datasets

  7. d

    Congressional Correspondence

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.wu.ac.at
    Updated Feb 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of IG (2025). Congressional Correspondence [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/congressional-correspondence
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Office of IG
    Description

    Requests and Responses to Member of Congress for various information

  8. f

    Table_1_Representation in sea turtle science: Slow progress towards gender...

    • figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nathan J. Robinson; Sophie Mills; Laura St.Andrews; Allegra Sundstrom; Jadyn Thibodeau; Adam Yaney-Keller; Christopher R. Gatto (2023). Table_1_Representation in sea turtle science: Slow progress towards gender equity and globalization revealed from thirty years of symposium abstracts.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.943056.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Nathan J. Robinson; Sophie Mills; Laura St.Andrews; Allegra Sundstrom; Jadyn Thibodeau; Adam Yaney-Keller; Christopher R. Gatto
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Sea turtles are a circumglobal taxon that receive considerable research and conservation attention; however, there is little published information about patterns of representation for people working with these species. To assess long-term trends in gender, geographic, and institutional representation within the sea turtle community, we quantified information from 7041 abstracts presented at the International Sea Turtle Symposium (ISTS) between 1988–2018. We report several key findings. (1) The number of authors per abstract doubled over the study period, suggesting greater acknowledgment of contributing individuals. (2) The proportion of female first and last authors has increased over time and at the end of the study period female first authors were in a slight majority (53%) even though last authors remained predominantly (64%) male. (3) Most researchers were from North America (45%) but representation from other continents has increased over time. (4) It was common for authors from North America (34%) and Europe (42%) to conducted research in other continents. This was far less common (

  9. U.S. Congress average age of members 2009-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. Congress average age of members 2009-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1357207/congress-members-average-age-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 3, 2015 - Jan 3, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    While the average age of members of Congress in the United States has gradually risen in recent years, this number decreased slightly with the beginning of the 119th Congress in 2025. This Congress first convened on January 3rd, 2025, and will end on January 3, 2027. In this Congress, the average age in the House of Representatives was 57 years, and the average age in the Senate was 64 years.

  10. O

    CT Congressional Districts

    • data.ct.gov
    • geodata.ct.gov
    • +1more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Jan 29, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office of Policy and Management (2025). CT Congressional Districts [Dataset]. https://data.ct.gov/Government/CT-Congressional-Districts/mesj-45sp/data
    Explore at:
    csv, application/rdfxml, application/rssxml, tsv, xml, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 29, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Office of Policy and Management
    Area covered
    Connecticut
    Description

    This feature layer represents the boundaries of Connecticut's congressional districts based on the latest redistricting process following the 2020 Census. More information about the 2021 Redistricting Project can be found here.

    The dataset includes the five congressional districts with fields identifying the current U.S. House Representative and their associated political party for each district. The geometry is derived from the published data from the Connecticut General Assembly.

    The CT Congressional Representations are as described here.

    Collection of CT Legislative District published feature layers:

    Attributes

    District

    Congressional district number (text/string)

    DistrictN

    Congressional district number (number/integer)

    Party

    Representative’s political party (Democratic or Republican)

    First Name

    Representative’s first name

    Last Name

    Representative’s last name

    Full Name

    Representative’s full name

    Full Name + Party

    Representative’s full name, plus political party

    Term

    The two-year term during which the representative serves in their elected role

    Adjacent Color ID

    An ID for the purpose of symbolization, so that each polygon receives a different color than the polygon adjacent to it.

  11. Dynamic Model of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Dec 3, 1996
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.; Lin, Tse-Min (1996). Dynamic Model of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01120.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 1996
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.; Lin, Tse-Min
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/1120/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/1120/terms

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In contrast to conventional studies on campaign finance, which focus on the aggregate effect of money on the vote, we propose a more general dynamic model based on temporally disaggregated data. The model is supported by the substantive understanding that at different stages of the campaign process candidates have different goals, and their expenditures should have different effects on the final election outcome. Using Achen's (1986) framework of quasi-experiments, the model includes dynamic "assignment equations" and "outcome equations," which address the problem of nonrandom assignment. A final vote equation is derived in which the coefficients of period-specific incumbent expenditures are constrained by an Almon polynomial. Empirical estimation provide evidence for a three-stage dynamic process.

  12. d

    Replication Data for: Senate Responsiveness in an Era of Inequality: The...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hayes, Thomas (2023). Replication Data for: Senate Responsiveness in an Era of Inequality: The Case of the U.S. Senate\" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EZ6YT1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Hayes, Thomas
    Description

    To what extent do members of Congress respond unequally to people in different economic situations? How does partisan control of the agenda change the way in which Senators respond to the poor? Using data from the 2004 National Annenberg Election Survey, and multiple roll call votes, I examine Senate responsiveness for the 107th through 111th Congresses. The results show consistent responsiveness toward upper income constituents. Moreover, Republicans are more responsive than Democrats to middle-income constituents in the 109th Congress, and a case study of the 107th Senate reveals that responsiveness toward the wealthy increases once Democrats take control of the chamber.

  13. T

    Data from: Congressional Districts

    • opendata.sandag.org
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Oct 3, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Congressional Districts [Dataset]. https://opendata.sandag.org/dataset/Congressional-Districts/emmi-sfe4
    Explore at:
    tsv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxml, csv, xml, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 3, 2022
    Description

    California State Congressional boundaries adopted for the June 2012 primary elections. Districts located within the County of San Diego were extracted and reprojected into SanGIS standard projection.Every 10 years, after the federal census, California must redraw the boundaries of its Congressional, State Senate, State Assembly, and State Board of Equalization districts, to reflect the new population data. Now those lines are drawn by the Commission. California voters authorized the creation of the Commission when they passed the Voters First Act, which appeared as Proposition 11 on the November 2008 general election ballot. Under the Act, the Commission is charged with drawing the boundaries of California’s Congressional, Senate, Assembly and Board of Equalization electoral districts.The commission has14 members from varied ethnic backgrounds and geographic locations in the state and includes five Democrats, five Republicans, and four Decline to State.http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov/

  14. U.S. Senators in Congress 1975-2025, by gender

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. Senators in Congress 1975-2025, by gender [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198423/senators-in-the-us-congress-by-gender-since-1975/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The 119th Congress began in January 2025. In this Congress, there were 26 women serving as Senators, and 74 men. The number of women has increased since the 1975 when there were no women in the Senate. The first female Senator was Rebecca Felton of Georgia who was sworn in 1922. A breakdown of women Senators by party can be found here.

  15. a

    Congressional District Boundaries 2019-2021

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • indianamap.org
    • +2more
    Updated Feb 17, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    IndianaMap (2020). Congressional District Boundaries 2019-2021 [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/INMap::congressional-district-boundaries-2019-2021
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 17, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    IndianaMap
    Area covered
    Description

    This data set shows Indiana's nine district boundaries (redistricted boundaries were adopted in May 2011 until 2021) for the 116th U.S. Congress and provides the name, party affiliation, and additional contact information for each of the representatives. The 116th U.S. Congress, Session I began on January 3, 2019. NOTE: A new Congress begins at noon January 3 of each odd-numbered year following a general election, unless it designates a different day by law. A Congress lasts for two years, with each year constituting a separate session. NOTE: Redistricting of all Indiana legislative boundaries were adopted in May 2011, and will be used from 2011 through 2021. Republicans who controlled the Indiana House and Senate from the 117th General Assembly oversaw the drawing of new maps in the Spring of 2011 for all 100 state house and 50 state senate districts and Indiana's nine congressional seats. New political districts are drawn every 10 years to incorporate information from the latest U.S. Census.

  16. g

    CBS News/New York Times October Foreign Policy/Congressional Scandal Poll,...

    • search.gesis.org
    Updated Feb 28, 2011
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (2011). CBS News/New York Times October Foreign Policy/Congressional Scandal Poll, October 5-7, 1991 - Version 1 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09803.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 28, 2011
    Dataset provided by
    ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research
    GESIS search
    License

    https://search.gesis.org/research_data/datasearch-httpwww-da-ra-deoaip--oaioai-da-ra-de457331https://search.gesis.org/research_data/datasearch-httpwww-da-ra-deoaip--oaioai-da-ra-de457331

    Description

    Abstract (en): This survey dealt primarily with foreign policy issues and the congressional check-writing scandal. Respondents were asked whether President George Bush had been spending too much of his time on foreign policy, whether the United States was in decline as a world power, how closely they followed news about foreign policy issues, which part of the world the president should focus his attention on and whether it was important enough to warrant taking attention away from problems at home, whether the United States was more respected in the world than it was ten years ago, if any country posed a serious military threat to the United States, how likely nuclear war was within the next ten years, and which country would be the number one economic power in the world in the next century. The survey also explored other foreign policy issues, including United States-Soviet relations in light of the break-up of the Soviet Union into different republics with separate governments, the war against Iraq, the involvement of the United States in establishing democracy in other countries, federal spending on military and defense programs, the nature of the changes in East-West relations brought about by recent world events, the relevance of a strong United States military and the maintenance of NATO, United States military intervention in trouble spots around the world, the funding and role of the Central Intelligence Agency, the future of nuclear weapons policy involving the United States and Soviet Union, circumstances under which the United States should give economic aid to the Soviet Union, the number of American troops stationed in Europe, United States relations with China, Israeli settlements on the West Bank, and the influence of Israel and Saudi Arabia on United States foreign policy. Respondents were also asked about the amount of attention they had given to the news of United States representatives writing bad checks, whether they thought the bad checks were written deliberately or by mistake, whether the congressional representative from the respondent's own district had knowingly written bad checks, if the respondent would vote for someone else if his/her congressman had knowingly written bad checks or had been slow in paying large bills at the congressional restaurant, and whether respondents considered the various free services received by members of Congress to be mostly unjustifiable privileges. ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Created variable labels and/or value labels.. Adult population of the United States aged 18 and over living in households with telephones. A variation of random digit dialing using primary sampling units (PSUs) was employed, consisting of blocks of 100 telephone numbers identical through the eighth digit and stratified by geographic region, area code, and size of place. Within households, respondents were selected using a method developed by Leslie Kish and modified by Charles Backstrom and Gerald Hursh (see Backstrom and Hursh, SURVEY RESEARCH [Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1963]). 2011-02-28 SAS, SPSS, and Stata setups have been added to this data collection. A weight variable has been included that must be used in any analysis. Telephone exchanges have been recoded to "999" and names of respondents have been blanked for reasons of confidentiality.

  17. Data from: Congressional Districts

    • fisheries.noaa.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated May 25, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Congressional Districts [Dataset]. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/56122
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 25, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Office for Coastal Management
    Time period covered
    May 16, 2019
    Area covered
    Pacific Ocean, North Pacific Ocean, Outer Continental Shelf, Territorial Sea, Exclusive Economic Zone, United States, United States
    Description

    These data depict the 117th Congressional Districts and their representatives for the United States. Congressional districts are the 435 areas from which members are elected to the U.S. House of Representatives. After the apportionment of congressional seats among the states, which is based on decennial census population counts, each state with multiple seats is responsible for establishing con...

  18. U.S. Congress members annual salary 1990-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. Congress members annual salary 1990-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1362153/congressional-salaries-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The annual salary received by members of the United States Congress in 2025 is 174,000 U.S. dollars. This has been the case since 2009. The Government Ethics Reform Act of 1989 provides an automatic cost of living adjustment increase in line with the

  19. f

    Data from: S1 Dataset -

    • plos.figshare.com
    csv
    Updated Nov 25, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Claudia Calderon; Tania C. Aburto; Carolina Batis; Alejandra Contreras-Manzano; Simón Barquera (2024). S1 Dataset - [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314040.s001
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Claudia Calderon; Tania C. Aburto; Carolina Batis; Alejandra Contreras-Manzano; Simón Barquera
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In 2020, Mexico’s Congress mandated front-of-package warning labels (FOPWL) and two cautionary legends; one of which for non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) with a statement “Contains NNS. Avoid in children”. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of the “excess in sugar” warning label (WL) and NNS cautionary legend on preference and healthfulness perception of fruit-based beverages among parents of 5–10 year-olds. Also, to test if parents’ preferences and perceptions differed by nutrition knowledge and previous knowledge on NNS. Data from the EPHA niñ@s (Study of the Perception and Dietary Habits in Children, for its acronym in Spanish) cohort were analyzed (n = 844). Parents were asked to choose between 100% juice and nectar with added sugars above the cut-off point, and between the latter and nectar with NNS marketed as “light”, and to rate how healthy they considered each product at two different timepoints. At time 1, products were shown without the FOPWL; at time 2, nectar with excess sugar had the “excess sugar” WL and nectar with NNS had the cautionary legend on NNS. General Linearized Models (GLM) were used to assess changes in preference and perceived healthiness. Interaction terms assessed the impact of nutrition knowledge and NNS awareness. The study found that FOPWL significantly shifted parental preferences towards 100% juice over nectar with “excess sugar” (15.4% increase, p

  20. U.S. House of Representatives seat distribution 2025, by state

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. House of Representatives seat distribution 2025, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1356977/house-representatives-seats-state-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    There are 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, of which 52 are allocated to the state of California. Seats in the House are allocated based on the population of each state. To ensure proportional and dynamic representation, congressional apportionment is reevaluated every 10 years based on census population data. After the 2020 census, six states gained a seat - Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina, and Oregon. The states of California, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia lost a seat.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). U.S. House of Representatives members 2001-2023, by race and ethnicity [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198437/representatives-in-the-us-congress-by-ethnic-group-since-1975/
Organization logo

U.S. House of Representatives members 2001-2023, by race and ethnicity

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Feb 25, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

There are 435 members of the House of Representatives in any congressional sitting. In the 118th Congress which began in January 2023, there were 58 Black members, 16 Asian American members, 54 Hispanic members.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu