Recent data on Jail Diversion activities in Massachusetts. Filter by year, demographic information, presenting problem, and diversion type. This data is updated every quarter.

The dataset contains an assortment of Excel analysis files and a Access database of fish information and trapping data from the fish ladder trap for years 1977 to 2008. Data was used to generate escapement counts for all runs of salmon and steelhead and has data on other species passing the Dam. This data and metadata were submitted by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Staff though the Data Management Plan (DMP) framework with the id: DMP000193. For more information, please visit https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/Sci-Data.

A. SUMMARY This dataset includes hospital diversion events declared by San Francisco hospitals. B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED San Francisco hospitals can declare ambulance diversion status, which diverts all ambulance transports away from the hospital of interest except certain specialty calls. This dataset contains number of diversion hours for each hospital. Each record includes the hospital name, the date and time diversion status started, the date and time diversion status ended, and duration of diversion status. C. UPDATE PROCESS The data is updated monthly by San Francisco Emergency Medical Services Agency. D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET Hospitals are allowed to go on diversion for a maximum of 2 hours before they must re-declare diversion. If 4 or more hospitals go on diversion at the same time, diversion is suspended across all hospitals which means that no hospitals can go on diversion for the next 4 hours. The exception is San Francisco General (SFG) hospital. SFG can declare Trauma Override (functionally identical to hospital diversion) while diversion is suspended since it is San Francisco’s only trauma center. Please refer to the Hospital Suspensions dataset for more information on diversion suspension.

This list includes detail information about every Point of Diversion water rights record in the State Water Resources Control Board's "Electronic Water Rights Information Management System" (EWRIMS) database. A Point of Diversion is the geographic area from which water is diverted using infrastructure (works) and put to beneficial use. Examples of works include water storage dams, diversion dams, dugouts, and pump sites along a surface water source. Each row correspond with a unique Point of Diversion ID and its associated data. The list include basic summary information about the Water Right record, such as the type and status, the location of the Points of Diversion, the amount of water allowed (Face Value), and summary data associated with the electronic Water Right record. This file is in flat file format and may not include all information associated to a water right such all uses and seasons or the amounts reported used for every month. That information may be available in the associated flat files for each category.

This feature class is updated every business day using Python scripts and the Permit database. Please disregard the "Date Updated" field as it does not keep in sync with DWR's internal enterprise geodatabase updates. This dataset contains the points of diversion (POD) for water rights based on the coordinate location (XY) provided in the NDWR’s Permit Database. Since there can be multiple permits on the same POD site, this dataset contains duplicate point features where several permits may be stacked on top of each other spatially. The advantage to using this dataset is that all permits in NDWR’s Permit database are available. Use a filter or definition query to restrict the permits needed.Background:NDWR’s Permit Database was created in 1992. Water Right applications are entered into the database with the Township Range and Section (TRS) of the proposed place of use). The Permit Database was designed to automatically create the point of diversion (POD) based on the centroid of the TRS provided.Starting in 2007, the Hydrology section began mapping PODs by the permit application description. Water rights points of diversion are mapped that contain one of the following: coordinate location (XY), bearing/distance based on a monument tie, application map that can be georeferenced, parcel number, or location description that can be identified on a topo map. The workflow for mapping PODs includes updating the auto-generated POD in the Permit Database to the location coordinates derived from mapping the application description. Some older water rights including Vested or Decreed Water Rights may not be mapped due to lack of sufficient location information.The Water Rights Section of NDWR is responsible for reviewing and approving water rights applications, for new appropriations and for changes to existing water rights, as well as evaluating and responding to protests of applications, approving subdivision dedications for water quantity, evaluating domestic well credits and relinquishments, issuing certificates for permitted water rights, conducting field investigations, and processing requests for extensions of time for filing proofs of completion and proofs of beneficial use.Please note that this POD feature class may not contain all water right information on a site or permit. The GIS datasets do not replace the need to review the Permit database and hard copy permit files and are intended for convenience in sharing information on a map, finding a location, seeing spatial patterns, and planning.Code Descriptions:app_status app_status_nameABN ABANDONED (inactive)ABR ABROGATED (inactive)APP APPLICATION (pending)CAN CANCELLED (inactive)CER CERTIFICATE (active)CUR CURTAILED (inactive)DEC DECREED (active)DEN DENIED (inactive)EXP EXPIRED (inactive)FOR FORFEITED (inactive)PER PERMIT (active)REJ REJECTED (inactive)REL RELINQUISHED (inactive)RES RESERVED (pending)RFA READY FOR ACTION (pending)RFP READY FOR ACTION PROTESTED (pending)RLP RELINQUISH A PORTION (active)RSC RESCINDED (inactive)RVK REVOKED (inactive)RVP REVOCABLE PERMIT (active)SUP SUPERSEDED (inactive)SUS SUSPENDED (inactive)VST VESTED RIGHT (pending)WDR WITHDRAWN (inactive)manner of use (mou) use_nameCOM COMMERCIALCON CONSTRUCTIONDEC AS DECREEDDOM DOMESTICDWR DEWATERINGENV ENVIRONMENTALIND INDUSTRIALIRC IRRIGATION-CAREY ACTIRD IRRIGATION-DLEIRR IRRIGATIONMM MINING AND MILLINGMUN MUNICIPALOTH OTHERPWR POWERQM QUASI-MUNICIPALREC RECREATIONALSTK STOCKWATERINGSTO STORAGEUKN UNKNOWNWLD WILDLIFEMMD MINING, MILLING AND DEWATERINGEVP EVAPORATIONsource source_nameEFF EFFLUENTGEO GEOTHERMALLAK LAKEOGW OTHER GROUND WATEROSW OTHER SURFACE WATERRES RESERVOIRSPR SPRINGSTO STORAGESTR STREAMUG UNDERGROUNDDate Field Descriptions:Permit Date—Date the permit was issued.File Date—Date application was filed at the Division.Sent for Publication—Date the notice that the application was filed was sent to the newspaper of record for publication.Last Publication—The last date of publication of said notice in the paper; 30 days from this date is the last day for filing a protest to an application.POC Filed Date—When a Proof of Completion of Work is accepted by this office, it becomes “filed” rather than just received. The filed date is the same as the received date.

These data are derived from a point shapefile created nightly from data in the Utah Division of Water Rights Database. The source data were acquired on October 26, 2005.

A Note from the State's Attorney's Office as of 12/30/2024:

The Cook County State's Attorney's Office believes data transparency is an important accountability and public safety tool and is committed to providing Cook County residents with this critical information. Currently, we are working to make sure that the data we share is valid, accurate, and presented in a format that is useful to the public. Our goal is to have resumed updating the Cook County open data site within the first 100 days of the new administration.

Dataset Description:

The Diversion dataset contains information on defendants who receive a referral to a diversion program, including the type of program and date of referral; each row is a program to which a defendant has been referred. Please use this link for more instructions and data glossary: https://www.cookcountystatesattorney.org/resources/how-read-data

This dataset has a data dictionary that can be downloaded here.The NM Office of the State Engineer (OSE) "Point of Diversions" (POD) layer includes well locations, surface declarations, or surface permits. These data were extracted from the OSE W.A.T.E.R.S. (Water Administration Technical Engineering Resource System) database and geo-located (mapped). These data have varying degrees of accuracy and have not been validated. This message is to alert users of this data to various changes regarding how this POD data is generated and maintained by the NM Office of the State Engineer. In addition, all attribute fields are fully described in the metadata, including descriptions of field codes. Please read the metadata accompanying this GIS data layer for further information. Any questions regarding this GIS data should be directed NM OSE Information Technology Systems Bureau GIS at the contact information given below.Stephen N. HayesNMOSE ITSB GIS Data Manager(505) 827-6321PO Box 25102Santa Fe, NM 87504stephen.hayes@ose.nm.gov

This digital dataset contains the monthly diversions from the surface water network in the updated Central Valley Hydrologic Model (CVHM2) for water years 1922-2019. The volume of water transported by surface-water diversions were updated in the CVHM2 from several sources, including: • The C2VSIM developed by DWR, • The WestSIM model, • Delta Mendota Canal turnout delivery data obtained from SLDMWA, • Delta delivery data obtained from Montgomery Watson. The surface water diversions are simulated through the Streamflow Routing Package (SFR2) using 571 diversion locations providing 564 semi-routed and 7 non-routed diversions. Linkages between SFR2 and the Farm-Process (FMP4) simulate the semi-routed and non-routed deliveries through the stream network from a specified diversion location. The semi-routed deliveries (SRD) are regulated by a diversion limit at each location so that FMP4 can only divert from the stream network up a certain amount, specified in the file, SRD_Diversion_Li ...

Project Overview The purpose of the study was to learn more about the perspectives of criminal justice stakeholders and graduates in prostitution diversion programs over a decade after its implementation and as a follow up to an ethnographic study conducted from 2011-2014, the data of which is also housed in the QDR database. The objective is to identify lessons learned and to develop knowledge about the evolution in graduates and other stakeholders' thinking about prostitution diversion programs and their continued efficacy and ethical legitimacy within an evolving social and legal context. This longitudinal qualitative study consists of semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 24 professional stakeholders and 3 graduates from two prostitution diversion programs. Interviews were conducted virtually via zoom for approximately 45-90 minutes, recorded, and transcribed. Content analysis involved open-coding and consensus by two coders. Data and Data Collection Overview This qualitative study included a sample of 27, comprised of 24 professional stakeholders and 3 former participants (two who successfully graduated and one who did not) from Project Dawn Court and two professional stakeholders from Baltimore’s Specialized Prostitution Diversion Program (formerly the Specialization Prostitution Diversion program). In order to yield a relatively comprehensive variety of perspectives from different time periods, we identified participants from the initial study through publicly available information and snowball sampling to connect with any current or former program stakeholders and program graduates. We contacted respondents via email to determine if they are interested in and willing to participate in the study and, in the case of snowball sampling, followed up in the manner indicated by anyone who agreed to allow the person who referred them to us. We conducted confidential virtual interviews using a semi-structured interview guide, largely tailoring the interviews to the individual respondents. Interviews conducted using the Zoom platform lasted between 45-90 minutes. All but two interviews were recorded, one due to researcher error the other at the request of the respondent. The research team reviewed and corrected all of the automated transcriptions. We requested permission to follow up for purposes of clarification or with follow up questions, which we did as needed. Two of the interviews included multiple participants at the suggestion of the respondents; all other interviews were of individuals. The PI conducted all but one of the interviews which was conducted by research team member and doctoral graduate research assistant Nancy Franke. Some were conducted only by the PI, others included Nancy Franke and, on several occasions, post-doctoral fellow Inbar Cohen, who also asked questions, generally toward the end of the interview. We used open, selective, and axial coding, reaching consensus on coding and later, emerging themes by at least two coders in order to analyze the data. Data were analyzed to build and generate both descriptive analysis (Sandelowski, 2000) and build theory (Charmaz, 2006), rather than beginning with a specific testable hypothesis (Padgett, 2008). We also used a constant comparative method of data analysis to allow us to revise the interview guide, as needed and to test our emerging conceptual frameworks to be examined in interviews with subsequent participants. We used NVIVO qualitative data software to code, analyze, and store the data. In order to protect confidentiality and maximize respondents’ comfort level in sharing candidly, we refer to respondents by their chosen pseudonym; those who had participated in the prior study are referred to by their original pseudonyms. We also did not share with others who consented or declined to participate, even when potential respondents were referred through snowball sampling. We told respondents from the outset that they could review their transcript for confirmation or if they wished to amend or delete anything. Two respondents requested deletion of small portions of their transcript, and another respondent offered a correction. Participation in all cases was voluntary; we reminded respondents of this from the outset and explained that this also related to any question that they chose not to answer and that could discontinue the interview at any time for any reason (or no reason). We also asked respondents to select a private and confidential location for the interview. Diversion program participants received a $25 electronic gift certificate to a vendor of their choice as compensation for their time and effort; legal system and affiliate professional stakeholders received no compensation for participating. Upon agreement to participate in the study, we shared a copy of a letter of explanation which contained all the elements of consent so that respondents could review it prior to the interview. Before the...

Points of Diversion (POD): Depicts the _location of each water right diversion point (POD) and provides basic information about the associated water right. All current and individually held water rights are shown in this data set except for those held by irrigation districts, applications, temporary transfers, instream leases, and limited licenses.Current code definitions at: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/WRDFormsPDF/wris_code_key.pdf.Compilation procedures document at: https://arcgis.wrd.state.or.us/data/OWRD_WR_GIS_procedures.pdf. ----- Places of Use (POU): Depicts the _location of each water right place of use (POU) polygon and provides basic information about the associated water right. All current and individually held water rights are shown in this data set except for those held by irrigation districts, applications, temporary transfers, instream leases, and limited licenses.Current code definitions at: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/WRDFormsPDF/wris_code_key.pdf.Compilation procedures document at: https://arcgis.wrd.state.or.us/data/OWRD_WR_GIS_procedures.pdf.

A. SUMMARY This dataset includes system-wide hospital diversion suspension information. B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED This dataset contains the date and time diversion suspension began and ended. Hospitals can voluntarily declare diversion, which diverts all ambulance transports away from the given hospital excepting specialty care transports. However, when 4 or more hospitals go on diversion at the same time, diversion is suspended system-wide for 4 hours. This is called diversion suspension. C. UPDATE PROCESS The data is updated monthly by San Francisco Emergency Medical Services Agency. D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET When 4 or more San Francisco hospitals declare diversion status, diversion gets suspended for all hospitals. Diversion suspension lasts for 4 hours until it ends and hospitals can declare diversion again. Please refer to the Hospital Diversions dataset for more information on diversion.

BackgroundTherapeutic use and abuse of prescription opioids in the United States increased substantially between 1990 and 2010. The Centers for Disease Control estimated deaths related to pharmaceutical opioids reached nearly 19,000 in 2014. Of prescription opioids sold, 10% are extended release (ER) and 90% immediate release (IR). However, most regulations and interventions have focused on decreasing ER abuse. Our objective was to compare rates of abuse and diversion of ER and IR opioid analgesics over time using multiple surveillance programs.MethodsRates of abuse and diversion of ER and IR opioid formulations were compared using data from four surveillance programs in the Researched Abuse, Diversion and Addiction Related Surveillance (RADARS®) System. Data were evaluated from 2009 through 2015, and Poisson regression used to compare IR and ER opioid cases over time.ResultsFrom 2009 to 2015, IR opioids were prescribed at a rate 12 to 16 times higher than ER. In the Poison Center Program, population-adjusted rates of Intentional Abuse for IR were 4.6 fold higher than ER opioids (p<0.001). In the Drug Diversion Program, population-adjusted rates of diversion were 6.1 fold higher for IR than ER opioids (p<0.001). In the Opioid Treatment Program, population-adjusted rates of endorsements for abuse were 1.6 fold higher for IR opioids than ER (p = 0.002). In the Survey of Key Informants' Patients Program, population-adjusted rates of endorsements for abuse were 1.5 fold higher for IR opioids than ER (p<0.001).ConclusionsBetween 2009 and 2015, IR opioids were prescribed at a much higher rate than ER opioids. Results from four surveillance programs show population-adjusted rates of prescription opioid abuse were markedly higher for IR than ER medications. For the greatest public health benefit, future interventions to decrease prescription opioid abuse should focus on both IR and ER formulations.

The NM Office of the State Engineer (OSE) "Point of Diversions" (POD) layer includes well locations, surface declarations, or surface permits updated on a monthly basis. These data were extracted from the OSE W.A.T.E.R.S. (Water Administration Technical Engineering Resource System) database and geo-located (mapped). These data have varying degrees of accuracy and have not been validated. Data included in this dataset only includes PODs that have coordinates located within the State of New Mexico. This message is to alert users of this data to various changes regarding how this POD data is generated and maintained by the NM Office of the State Engineer. In addition, all attribute fields are fully described in the metadata, including descriptions of field codes. Please read the metadata accompanying this GIS data layer for further information. Any questions regarding this GIS data should be directed NM OSE Information Technology Systems Bureau GIS at the contact information given below.

The Solid Waste Alternatives Program (SWAP) is a financial assistance program with a primary objective of assisting in the reduction of the amount of solid waste generated and the amount of solid waste landfilled in the state of Iowa. To this end, SWAP provides financial support for the development and implementation of Best Practices, Education and Market Development projects that focus on waste reduction and landfill diversion. The database allows for project searches by city name, county name, contract number, organization name (i.e. contractor name), funding round, and project keyword search.

The United States Water Withdrawals Database (USWWD) provides a standardized compilation of user-level water withdrawal data across 42 US states. USWWD provides time series of water withdrawals at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolutions, encompassing 188,857 unique water users, 353,694 points of diversion and use, and 58,439,412 withdrawal volumes included in 7,524,266 records across various sectors. USWWD integrates diverse state-level data sources, standardizing information on water users, withdrawal locations, volumes, source types, and primary water use categories. The withdrawal data combines both direct measurements and various estimation techniques, reflecting the diverse methods utilized by different state agencies in reporting water usage. USWWD addresses significant gaps in national water use data, enabling researchers to conduct detailed analyses of water withdrawal patterns, trends, and drivers across space, time, and sectors. This granular dataset supports a wide range of applications, including water resource management, planning, and policy development. By providing the most detailed national water use data to date, USWWD facilitates new understanding of how society uses water.

This HydroShare data repository contains the complete USWWD dataset, organized by state in individual folders under the Data directory. Each state folder contains two primary files: the Water Use Characteristics file, which includes detailed tabular data on water withdrawal volumes, use sectors, measurement methods, water sources, types, and data flags; and the Water Withdrawal or Use Locations file, which provides location data including latitude and longitude coordinates for water diversion points and users. The repository also houses essential code in the Code directory, featuring Jupyter Notebooks for subclassifying unspecified water use categories, conducting data flagging assessments, and generating visualizations presented in the data descriptor (under review at Nature's Scientific Data) documenting USWWD database creation. Additionally, the repository includes metadata tables and the communication protocol used for communicating with state agencies that provided the source data. The repository also contains USGS five-year water use data products from 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015 that were used for comparison with USWWD data.

Points of Diversion (POD): Depicts the location of each water right diversion point (POD) and provides basic information about the associated water right. All current and individually held water rights are shown in this data set except for those held by irrigation districts, applications, temporary transfers, instream leases, and limited licenses.Current code definitions at: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/WRDFormsPDF/wris_code_key.pdf.Compilation procedures document at: https://arcgis.wrd.state.or.us/data/OWRD_WR_GIS_procedures.pdf. ----- Places of Use (POU): Depicts the location of each water right place of use (POU) polygon and provides basic information about the associated water right. All current and individually held water rights are shown in this data set except for those held by irrigation districts, applications, temporary transfers, instream leases, and limited licenses.Current code definitions at: https://www.oregon.gov/owrd/WRDFormsPDF/wris_code_key.pdf.Compilation procedures document at: https://arcgis.wrd.state.or.us/data/OWRD_WR_GIS_procedures.pdf.

This data release contains an inventory of 1,358 major surface water diversion structures with associated daily time series withdrawal records (1980-2022) for structures within the Upper Colorado River and Little Colorado River Basins. Diversion structures were included in this dataset if they were determined to have the capacity to divert water at rates greater than 10 cubic feet per second. Since those river basins encompasses portions of five states, water use data are dispersed among numerous federal and state agency databases and there is no centralized dataset that documents surface water use within the entire UCOL at a fine spatial and temporal resolution. Diversion structures and locations were identified from a mix of state reports, maps, and satellite imagery. A Python script was developed to automate retrieval of daily time series withdrawal records from multiple state and federal databases. The script was also used to process, filter, and harmonize the diversion recor ...

The CMPD Diversion Program offers first time offenders ages 6 to 17 an opportunity to have their cases diverted from the Juvenile Justice system while maintaining accountability for delinquent acts and providing appropriate supports to redirect behavior. Youth referred to the program are assessed and assigned to an appropriate workshop consisting of 8 hours of interpersonal skills building accompanied by a parent or guardian while the youth can have weekly contacts with their School Resource Officer. The goal is for youth to improve personal decision-making skills and empower the families through education, direction, and guidance. The CMPD Diversion Program helps reduce the use of formal processing and incarceration, improve public safety, avoid wasteful spending, reduce racial and ethnic disparities, and limit the collateral consequences youth encounter through exposure to the juvenile justice system. For more information, please visit http://charlottenc.gov/CMPD/Pages/Resources/OpenData_Source.aspx.

Austin Resource Recovery daily report providing waste collection information based on the following categories: Report Date: The date collections information was recorded. Load Type: The specific type of load that is being collected on that day. Load Weight: The weight (in pounds) collected for each service on the day it was delivered to a diversion facility Drop off Site: The _location where each type of waste is delivered for disposal, recycling or reuse: TDS Landfill indicates the Texas Disposal System landfill located at 12200 Carl Rd, Creedmoor, TX 78610; Balcones Recycling is a recycling facility located at 9301 Johnny Morris Road Austin, TX 78724; MRF is a Materials Recycling Facility (such as Texas Disposal Systems or Balcones Recycling); Hornsby Bend is located at 2210 FM 973, Austin, TX 78725 and accepts food scraps, yard trimmings, food-soiled paper and other materials collected by ARR, and combined with other waste to produce nutrient-rich dillo dirt, used for landscaping. Route Type: The general category of collection service provided by Austin Resource Recovery This information is used to help ARR reach its goals to transform waste into resources while keeping our community clean. For more information, visit www.austintexas.gov/department/austin-resource-recovery