Facebook
TwitterACF Agency Wide resource
Metadata-only record linking to the original dataset. Open original dataset below.
Facebook
TwitterA list of Sixth Judicial Agent emails for report disbursement.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
Market Overview The global wireless doc camera market is projected to exhibit significant growth, driven by the increasing demand for advanced visual presentation solutions in educational institutions, corporate offices, and public spaces. The market size was valued at USD XXX million in 2023 and is expected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, growing at a CAGR of XX%. The adoption of wireless doc cameras is fueled by their ease of use, portability, and ability to enhance collaboration and engagement during presentations and training sessions. Market Drivers and Restraints The growth of the wireless doc camera market is attributed to several key factors. Firstly, the increasing investment in educational technology is driving the demand for innovative solutions that enhance the learning process. Secondly, the growing trend of remote work and hybrid learning is creating a need for flexible and portable presentation equipment that can support collaboration across multiple locations. However, the high cost of wireless doc cameras and concerns over security and data privacy pose challenges to the market's growth.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Doc management software market size was USD 7215.5 million in 2024. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.20% from 2024 to 2031.
The adoption of cloud computing and storage solutions is propelling growth in the document management software market. Cloud-based platforms offer businesses scalable and cost-effective solutions for storing and managing vast amounts of data without the need for substantial on-premises infrastructure. These solutions enable easy access to documents from any location, supporting remote work and collaboration. Enhanced security features, data backup, and compliance capabilities further attract organizations to cloud-based options. The flexibility and integration with other business tools streamline workflows and increase productivity. Additionally, cloud providers’ continuous innovation, such as AI-powered document search and analysis, boosts overall system efficiency. This trend underscores the strong drive in market growth toward digital transformation. For instance, in May 2024, Noventiq unveiled its innovative uDMS, a smart, serverless document management system (DMS) aimed at optimizing operational efficiency and flexibility for businesses. Built on AWS using advanced serverless architecture, uDMS transformed document management by eliminating traditional server needs, reducing IT overhead, and enhancing scalability.
The rise in digital transformation initiatives across various industries fuels the growth of the document management software market. Businesses are increasingly adopting these solutions to streamline operations, enhance productivity, and reduce dependence on paper-based processes. The shift to digital platforms allows for better data organization, faster access, and improved compliance with regulatory requirements. Sectors such as healthcare, finance, and legal are seeing significant adoption as they aim to manage vast amounts of data securely and efficiently. Additionally, the integration of AI and machine learning into document management systems enhances automation and data extraction capabilities. This trend highlights the importance of digital tools in modernizing document workflows and boosting overall efficiency.
Compatibility issues with different file formats and software present a significant challenge in the document management software market. Organizations often work with a variety of file types, and ensuring seamless integration across multiple systems can be challenging. This limitation complicates the adoption of document management solutions, especially for businesses reliant on legacy systems or specialized for...
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global Template Manager for Docs market size in 2024 stands at USD 1.12 billion, with a notable compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.5% projected from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to reach USD 3.41 billion. This rapid expansion is primarily driven by the increasing demand for automation and standardization in document management processes across various industries, aiming to enhance productivity, ensure compliance, and reduce operational costs. As per our latest research, the Template Manager for Docs market is poised for robust growth, fueled by technological advancements and the rising adoption of digital documentation solutions worldwide.
One of the primary growth drivers for the Template Manager for Docs market is the accelerated digital transformation initiatives across organizations of all sizes. Enterprises are increasingly seeking efficient solutions to manage, standardize, and automate their document creation processes. The proliferation of remote and hybrid work environments has intensified the need for centralized template management systems, ensuring consistency and compliance in documentation regardless of the user’s location. Moreover, as businesses expand globally, the necessity to maintain brand consistency and adhere to regulatory requirements across geographies has become more critical. This has led to a surge in the adoption of sophisticated template management software, which not only streamlines document workflows but also integrates seamlessly with other enterprise systems such as CRM, ERP, and collaboration platforms. The shift towards cloud-based solutions further amplifies this trend, offering scalability, accessibility, and real-time collaboration capabilities, thus fueling market growth.
Another significant factor contributing to the growth of the Template Manager for Docs market is the increasing focus on data security and compliance. With stringent regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and others being enforced across various sectors, organizations are under immense pressure to ensure that all documents adhere to prescribed standards and are securely managed. Template managers offer robust permission controls, audit trails, and version management features that help mitigate risks associated with unauthorized access or non-compliance. The BFSI and healthcare sectors, in particular, are witnessing heightened adoption rates due to their sensitive nature of data and the critical need for accurate, compliant documentation. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into template management solutions is revolutionizing the way templates are created, updated, and managed, further enhancing efficiency and reducing manual intervention.
Furthermore, the rise of industry-specific use cases is propelling the Template Manager for Docs market forward. In sectors such as education, government, and retail, the volume and diversity of documents generated daily necessitate robust template management systems. Educational institutions are leveraging these solutions to standardize syllabi, certificates, and administrative documents, while government agencies utilize them to ensure uniformity in official communications and policy documents. Retailers, on the other hand, benefit from template managers by maintaining consistency in marketing materials, invoices, and contracts across multiple outlets. The growing trend of integrating template management with business intelligence and analytics platforms is also enabling organizations to gain actionable insights into document usage patterns, further optimizing their operations and driving market growth.
From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the Template Manager for Docs market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the region’s advanced IT infrastructure, high adoption rates of cloud-based solutions, and the presence of major industry players. Europe follows closely, driven by stringent regulatory frameworks and a strong focus on digital transformation across industries. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period, fueled by rapid economic development, increasing internet penetration, and the rising adoption of enterprise software solutions in emerging economies such as China and India. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are al
Facebook
TwitterThis accession contains multiple entries of Microfiche data that was provided by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Panama City. Following is a list of data report number and the title of the microfiche entry.
Data Report 14 is entitled "Hydrographic Observations of Tampa Bay, Florida, and Adjacent Gulf of Mexico - 1963". The authors are J.H. Finucane and A. Dragovich. (2/2 microfiche).
Data Report 4 is entitled "Hydrographic Observations of tampa bay, florida and Adjacent Waters, August 1961 through December 1962". The authors are Carl H. Saloman, John H. Finucane and John A. Kelly, Jr. (6/6 microfiche).
Data Report 13 is entitled "Oceanographic Observations of Tampa Bay, Charlotte Harbor, Pine Island Sound, Florida, and Adjacent Waters of the Gulf of Mexico, February 1964 through February 1965". The authors are A. Dragovich, J.A. Kelly and J.H. Finucane. (2/2 microfiche).
Data Report 84 is entitled "Hydrographic and Meteorolgical Observations from Tampa Bay and Adjacent Waters - 1971". The author is C.H. Saloman (9/9 microfiche).
Data Report 55 is entitled "Hydrographic Observations in Tampa Bay, Florida and Adjacent Gulf of Mexico 1967". The authors are C.H. Saloman and J. L. Taylor, April 1971. (2/2 microfiche).
Data Report 24 is entitled "Hydrographic Observations of Tampa Bay, Florida and Adjacent Gulf of Mexico, 1965 - 1966". The authors are C.H Saloman and J.L. Taylor. (6/6 microfiche).
Data Report 63 is entitled "Hydrographic Observations of Tampa Bay, Florida and Adjacent Gulf of Mexico 1968". The authors are C.H Saloman and J.L. Taylor. (4/4 microfiche).
Data Report 63 is entitled "Hydrographic Observations of Tampa Bay, Florida and Adjacent Waters, May 1971 through April 1973". The authors are L.A. Collins and J. H. Finucane. (3/3 microfiche).
A publication from DOC/NOAA/NMFS Data Report 90 is entitled "Hydrographic Observations in Tampa Bay and Adjacent Waters 1972" by C.H. Saloman and L.A. Collins. This report includes hydrographic data, chlorophyll and primary productivity data. This report covers monthly observations during 1972.
A publication from DOC/NOAA/NMFS Data Report 77 entitled "Hydrographic Observations in Tampa Bay, Florida 1970" by C.H. Saloman. This report includes hydrographic data, chlorophyll and primary productivity data, and measurements for rainfall, wind direction and velocity. This report covers monthly observations during 1970.
Facebook
TwitterThe latest estimates from the 2010/11 Taking Part adult survey produced by DCMS were released on 30 June 2011 according to the arrangements approved by the UK Statistics Authority.
30 June 2011
**
April 2010 to April 2011
**
National and Regional level data for England.
**
Further analysis of the 2010/11 adult dataset and data for child participation will be published on 18 August 2011.
The latest data from the 2010/11 Taking Part survey provides reliable national estimates of adult engagement with sport, libraries, the arts, heritage and museums & galleries. This release also presents analysis on volunteering and digital participation in our sectors and a look at cycling and swimming proficiency in England. The Taking Part survey is a continuous annual survey of adults and children living in private households in England, and carries the National Statistics badge, meaning that it meets the highest standards of statistical quality.
These spreadsheets contain the data and sample sizes for each sector included in the survey:
The previous Taking Part release was published on 31 March 2011 and can be found online.
This release is published in accordance with the Code of Practice for Official Statistics (2009), as produced by the http://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/">UK Statistics Authority (UKSA). The UKSA has the overall objective of promoting and safeguarding the production and publication of official statistics that serve the public good. It monitors and reports on all official statistics, and promotes good practice in this area.
The document below contains a list of Ministers and Officials who have received privileged early access to this release of Taking Part data. In line with best practice, the list has been kept to a minimum and those given access for briefing purposes had a maximum of 24 hours.
The responsible statistician for this release is Neil Wilson. For any queries please contact the Taking Part team on 020 7211 6968 or takingpart@culture.gsi.gov.uk.
Facebook
TwitterThe Flash report provides monthly performance data on key ACS child welfare, child care, and juvenile justice functions such as children using vouchers for child care, child protective caseloads, and the number of admissions to detention. Each row of data in the Excel file posted to Open Data is a distinct measure in the Flash Report.The columns are the month of the data. Data are updated semiannually in September and April using data from queries of administrative data systems and data provided directly from program areas. A graphic version of the Flash Report is posted monthly to the ACS internet webpage https://www1.nyc.gov/site/acs/about/flashindicators.page
For the User Guide, please follow this link.
For the Data Dictionary, please follow this link.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 73 verified Doc Popcorn locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://data.mfe.govt.nz/license/attribution-3-0-new-zealand/https://data.mfe.govt.nz/license/attribution-3-0-new-zealand/
New Zealand’s four million km2 marine environment is diverse, with a range of coastal habitats and offshore seabed environments. There are also many marine species unique to New Zealand. Marine protected areas conserve or manage some of these unique habitats and species, while a range of other tools also provide marine protection. We report on the area covered by these tools as an indirect measure to understand the state of the marine environment. Marine mammal sanctuaries are one of the marine protection tools used. They are designed to protect New Zealand’s unique range of marine mammals by reducing harmful human impacts, particularly in vulnerable areas such as migratory routes and breeding grounds. Each marine mammal sanctuary has a specific set of restrictions based on the species that occupy, or pass through that particular area.
Facebook
TwitterReports prepared by the Departments and Agencies on status of NEPA progress for activities and projects funded under Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Facebook
TwitterThe USA-PRC Joint Program on Air-Sea Interaction Studies in the Tropical Western Pacific is a component of the Protocol on Cooperation in the Field of Marine and Fishery Science and Technology signed by the State Oceanic Administration (SOA), the People's Republic of China and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the United State of America. This program is also a part of the Tropical Ocean and Global Atmosphere Program (TOGA).
The second cruise of the USA-PRC Joint Program was conducted by the R/V Xiangyanghong No.5 of the SOA, PRC from November 15, 1968 through March 5, 1987.
Some of the investigation data are published in the form of "quick look" data set. Owing to the time limitation, part of the data has not been processed under strict quality control.
There are four reports in the publication:
Preliminary CTD Data Report Nutrient, Chlorophyll a and Primary Production Preliminary Report Marine Meteorology Data Report Precipitation Data Report
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The Document Management Software (DMS) market is booming, projected to reach $45 billion by 2033 with a 12% CAGR. Discover key trends, driving factors, and leading companies shaping this rapidly evolving industry. Explore regional market shares and insights into cloud-based vs. mobile DMS solutions.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This repository contains the datasets and code underpinning Chapter 3 "Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of Plan S" of the report "Galvanising the Open Access Community: A Study on the Impact of Plan S" commissioned by the cOAlition S to scidecode science consulting.
Two categories of files are part of this repository:
1. Datasets
The 21 CSV source files contain the subsets of publications funded by the funding agencies that are part of this study. These files have been provided by OA.Works, with whom scidecode has collaborated for the data collection process. Data sources and collection and processing workflows applied by OA.Works are described on their website and specifically at https://about.oa.report/docs/data.
The file "plan_s.dta" is the aggregated data file stored in the format ".dta", which can be accessed with STATA by default or with plenty of programming languages using the respective packages, e.g., R or Python.
2. Code files
The associated code files that have been used to process the data files are:
- data_prep_and_analysis_script.do
- coef_plots_script.R
The first file has been used to process the CSV data files above for data preparation and analysis purposes. Here, data aggregation and data preprocessing is executed. Furthermore, all statistical regressions for the ounterfactual impact evaluation are listed in this code file. The second code file "coef_plots_script.R" uses the computed results of the counterfactual impact evaluation to create the final graphic plots using the ggplot2 package.
The first ".do" file has to be run in STATA, the second one (".R") requires the use of an integrated development environment for R.
Further Information are avilable in the final report and via the followng URLs:https://www.coalition-s.org/ https://scidecode.com/ https://oa.works/ https://openalex.org/
https://sites.google.com/view/wbschmal
Facebook
Twitter2011 Annual Report Docs Sent To ASCLD LAB
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Version 10 release notes:Changes release notes description, does not change data.Version 9 release notes:Adds 2019 data.Version 8 release notes:Adds 2018 data.Changes source of data for years 1985-2018 to be directly from the FBI. 2018 data was received via email from the FBI, 2016-2017 is from the FBI who mailed me a DVD, and 1985-2015 data is from the FBI's Crime Data Explorer site (https://crime-data-explorer.fr.cloud.gov/downloads-and-docs).Adds .csv version of the data.Makes minor changes to value labels for consistency and to fix grammar. Version 7 release notes:Changes project name to avoid confusing this data for the ones done by NACJD.Version 6 release notes:Adds 2017 data.Version 5 release notes:Adds 2016 data.Standardizes the "group" column which categorizes cities and counties by population.Arrange rows in descending order by year and ascending order by ORI. Version 4 release notes: Fix bug where Philadelphia Police Department had incorrect FIPS county code. Version 3 Release Notes:Merges data with LEAIC data to add FIPS codes, census codes, agency type variables, and ORI9 variable.Change column names for relationship variables from offender_n_relation_to_victim_1 to victim_1_relation_to_offender_n to better indicate that all relationship are victim 1's relationship to each offender. Reorder columns.This is a single file containing all data from the Supplementary Homicide Reports from 1976 to 2018. The Supplementary Homicide Report provides detailed information about the victim, offender, and circumstances of the murder. Details include victim and offender age, sex, race, ethnicity (Hispanic/not Hispanic), the weapon used, circumstances of the incident, and the number of both offenders and victims. Years 1976-1984 were downloaded from NACJD, while more recent years are from the FBI. All files came as ASCII+SPSS Setup files and were cleaned using R. The "cleaning" just means that column names were standardized (different years have slightly different spellings for many columns). Standardization of column names is necessary to stack multiple years together. Categorical variables (e.g. state) were also standardized (i.e. fix spelling errors, have terminology be the same across years). The following is the summary of the Supplementary Homicide Report copied from ICPSR's 2015 page for the data.The Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) provide detailed information on criminal homicides reported to the police. These homicides consist of murders; non-negligent killings also called non-negligent manslaughter; and justifiable homicides. UCR Program contributors compile and submit their crime data by one of two means: either directly to the FBI or through their State UCR Programs. State UCR Programs frequently impose mandatory reporting requirements which have been effective in increasing both the number of reporting agencies as well as the number and accuracy of each participating agency's reports. Each agency may be identified by its numeric state code, alpha-numeric agency ("ORI") code, jurisdiction population, and population group. In addition, each homicide incident is identified by month of occurrence and situation type, allowing flexibility in creating aggregations and subsets.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Department of Social Services (DSS) is the Australian Government’s preeminent source of advice on social policy and works in partnership with other government and non-government organisations to manage a diverse range of programs and services designed to support and improve the lives of Australians. DSS has whole of government responsibility
Families and Children
Housing Support
Seniors
Communities and Vulnerable People
Disability and Carers
Women's Safety
Mental Health
Settlement and Multicultural Affairs
Ageing and Aged Care
Review of Australia’s Welfare System
This statistical overview presents information about income support payments and customers administered by a number of Australian Government departments.
Unless otherwise indicated, the statistics relate to the relevant pay periods closest to 30 June. These periods will generally be within a fortnight either side of that date.
Key sections of the overview are:
payments for older people,
people with disability and
those caring for people with disability, severe medical conditions,
or those who are frail aged
student and labour market related payments
family assistance
other payments and services
pensioners paid overseas.
Payment and allowance information, including eligibility criteria, are included within each section. When The Department of Social Services was formed in September 2013 the publishing of the Statistical Paper series ceased. The DSS Payments Demographic Data Set is updated quarterly and covers the majority of the information contained in the Statistical Paper series. Please contact the Data Requests team if you have any questions in relation to this publication or the DSS Payment Demographic Data Set.
Further information to assist with the interpretation of statistics is available from the DSS and Human Services websites:
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset lists the total population 18 years and older by census block in Connecticut before and after population adjustments were made pursuant to Public Act 21-13. PA 21-13 creates a process to adjust the U.S. Census Bureau population data to allow for most individuals who are incarcerated to be counted at their address before incarceration. Prior to enactment of the act, these inmates were counted at their correctional facility address.
The act requires the CT Office of Policy and Management (OPM) to prepare and publish the adjusted and unadjusted data by July 1 in the year after the U.S. census is taken or 30 days after the U.S. Census Bureau’s publication of the state’s data.
A report documenting the population adjustment process was prepared by a team at OPM composed of the Criminal Justice Policy and Planning Division (OPM CJPPD) and the Data and Policy Analytics (DAPA) unit. The report is available here: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/OPM/CJPPD/CjAbout/SAC-Documents-from-2021-2022/PA21-13_OPM_Summary_Report_20210921.pdf
Note: On September 21, 2021, following the initial publication of the report, OPM and DOC revised the count of juveniles, reallocating 65 eighteen-year-old individuals who were incorrectly designated as being under age 18. After the DOC released the updated data to OPM, the report and this dataset were updated to reflect the revision.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-orderhttps://www.statsndata.org/how-to-order
The document camera, often referred to as a Doc Camera, has become an essential tool in various sectors, particularly education and business, where the ability to display and project documents, objects, and images in real-time can significantly enhance communication and collaboration. As more educators and professio
Facebook
TwitterLicence Ouverte / Open Licence 1.0https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Open_Licence.pdf
License information was derived automatically
Management Report 2010
Facebook
TwitterACF Agency Wide resource
Metadata-only record linking to the original dataset. Open original dataset below.