In 2023, almost one out of three ever-partnered Turkish women had experienced domestic violence. In comparison, only 12 percent of women living in Switzerland had experienced domestic violence in their lifetime.

In late March of 2020, many governments in Latin America imposed lockdowns in order to avoid the further spread of the virus SARS-CoV-2. As a result of the isolation, a steep rise of gender violence and family abuse cases was identified in several countries in the region. For instance, Mexico's domestic violence reports increased 25 percent in March 2020, in comparison to the same month of the previous year. In Argentina, a hotline for sexual violence victims received more than two thirds more phone calls in April 2020, compared to a year earlier. Argentina is one of the Latin American countries with the highest number of femicide victims.

The main purpose of the EU survey on gender-based violence against women and other forms of inter-personal violence (EU-GBV) is to assess the prevalence of violence in order to address the requirements of the Istanbul Convention. The survey covers psychological, physical and sexual violence by intimate partner, physical and sexual violence by non-partner, sexual harassment at work, violence experienced in childhood and stalking by any perpetrator.

The data collection for the first wave (year 2021) was conducted in voluntary bases and took place between September 2020 and March 2024 in the EU countries, based on their national timetables. Eurostat coordinated data collection in 18 Member States (BE, BG, DK, EE, EL, ES, FR, HR, LV, LT, MT, NL, AT, PL, PT, SI, SK, FI). Additionally, Italy agreed to share data from their national survey on violence against women, but the implementation of the survey was postponed from 2022 to 2024 due to administrative difficulties. The indicators disseminated for Italy are based on the last national survey conducted in 2014, given that the prevalence of gender-based violence is not expected to differ significantly over time, specifically for prevalence of lifetime violence, and the indicators will be updated when 2024 survey results will be available. Moreover, indicators on sexual harassment at work disseminated for Italy are based on the national victimisation survey of 2022-2023. To cover the full EU, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) launched a joint data collection in the eight Member States not covered by Eurostat (CZ, DE, IE, CY, LU, HU, RO, SE) following the EU-GBV manual. Accordingly, data disseminated for wave 2021 and estimated EU-average is based on a joint data collection by Eurostat, FRA and EIGE.

The disseminated indicators focus on violence by perpetrator, disaggregated by type of violence, by time of occurrence, by age and by personal characteristics of the respondent; and on frequency, severity, seriousness and reporting of the experienced violence.

However, it is necessary to point out that survey data might only be a close proxy to real prevalence as survey data depends on the willingness of the respondent to disclose any violence experienced. Therefore, to understand the prevalence of violence and disclosure rates by survey respondents, it is important to take into account the extent to which violence is tolerated in the wider community. For example, in cultures where people are ready to talk about their painful experiences, their answers may reflect more accurately their own experiences rather than community norms. To provide some background on country specific context, few indicators on commonness and awareness of support services are disseminated.

It is essential to avoid using sensitive terms that could cause anxiety or concern when introducing the survey. Accordingly, the general recommendation was that the survey name should be neutral when contacting the respondents. The aim was to avoid alerting any perpetrators of domestic violence to the nature of the survey or frightening off any victims of violence, in order to minimise non-response, as some respondents might be discouraged from taking part if the name of the survey included terms like ‘assault’, ‘sexual violence’, or ‘gender-based violence’.

Majority of countries have followed this recommendation and the title of the survey was translated as survey on health, safety or security and well-being or living conditions; quality of life or relationship survey. Only few countries (BG, SK) used gender-based violence in the title of the survey during data collection and explained that this decision was taken as no issue appeared during testing the survey using the word “violence”, or the word "violence" was used in order to avoid misunderstanding regarding the aim of the survey and to reduce non-response due to the fact that respondents were not aware of the real theme of the survey.

However, the pilot survey results indicate that respondents understood the rationale for the choice of neutral survey name once they had been given an explanation, and agreed that it was right. Due to the sensitivity of the topic, the participating countries were strongly encouraged to include experts on violence against women and/or gender-based violence as well as psychologists and psychotherapists in every step of the survey - from the preparation, through the field work to the data dissemination.

Majority of countries included experts on the topic in the project team: gender statisticians, gender-based violence or violence against women researchers, policy experts, psychologists, social workers, experts working on victim support or NGOs, experts on victimization surveys. External experts were included in the preparation of the survey, training of the interviewers and in order to provide support to the interviewers.

Few countries (MT, FI) established the focus group or expert group consisting of different experts in the field and providing the support to the survey during all phases.

In the CEE region, Slovenia recorded the highest proportion of women who experienced physical or sexual violence from their partners. The lowest percentage was recorded in Croatia and Poland in 2018. Slovenia and Poland were also the countries who recorded the highest percentage of women reporting domestic violence to the police.

Anti-social behaviour (ASB) outcomes for disabled people in England and Wales aged 16 and over, with analysis by disability status, country, sex, age, impairment type, type of ASB. Domestic abuse and sexual assault outcomes for disabled people in England and Wales aged 16 to 59 years, with analysis by disability status, age, sex, impairment type, impairment severity, country and region. All outcomes using the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) data.

Domestic Abuse Geofence Alert Programs Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the Global Domestic Abuse Geofence Alert Programs market size was valued at $1.2 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $4.3 billion by 2033, expanding at a robust CAGR of 15.8% during 2024–2033. This remarkable growth trajectory is primarily driven by the increasing integration of advanced geolocation technologies and artificial intelligence within public safety frameworks, coupled with a global surge in legislative and policy initiatives aimed at combating domestic abuse. As awareness of domestic violence issues rises, both government and non-governmental organizations are rapidly adopting geofence alert programs to provide real-time protection and intervention for at-risk individuals, thereby fueling market expansion across multiple sectors and regions.

Regional Outlook

North America currently holds the largest share of the Domestic Abuse Geofence Alert Programs market, accounting for over 38% of the global value in 2024. This dominance is attributed to the region’s mature technological infrastructure, widespread adoption of digital safety solutions, and proactive public safety policies. The United States, in particular, has witnessed significant investments in software and hardware for geofencing applications, driven by strong collaboration between law enforcement, healthcare providers, and social services. Furthermore, ongoing government funding and the presence of leading technology vendors have accelerated innovation and deployment rates, making North America a pivotal hub for market development.

Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, projected to register a CAGR of 19.2% through 2033. Several factors underpin this rapid expansion, including increased digitalization of public safety systems, rising awareness of domestic violence, and significant investments from both public and private sectors. Countries such as India, China, and Australia are actively piloting and scaling geofence alert programs, often supported by international NGOs and local government initiatives. The growing penetration of smartphones, coupled with the expansion of cloud-based deployment models, is making these solutions more accessible and affordable, thereby driving adoption across diverse urban and rural landscapes.

In contrast, emerging economies in Latin America and the Middle East & Africa face unique adoption challenges, such as limited digital infrastructure, varying levels of policy enforcement, and budgetary constraints. However, localized demand for domestic abuse prevention tools is gradually increasing, supported by targeted policy reforms and awareness campaigns. In these regions, NGOs and community organizations play a critical role in advocating for and implementing geofence alert programs, often adapting solutions to suit local cultural and regulatory contexts. While growth rates are currently moderate, the potential for future expansion remains significant as digital transformation initiatives gain momentum and international partnerships proliferate.

Report Scope

In 2022, an estimated ***** femicides were reported in ******, making it the European country with the highest number of such crimes. Femicides, defined as the gender-based killing of women and girls, represent the most extreme form of violence against women. That same year, Turkey, and the United Kingdom ranked second and third, with *** and *** cases, respectively.

Sample size of Demographic and health surveys and prevalence of intimate-partner violence across 30 Sub-Saharan African countries.

This statistic presents public perception on frequency of domestic violence against women in the European Union (EU) in 2016. In total, ** percent of those surveyed believed that domestic violence against women was common in their country. By contrast, only *** percent of respondents thought it was not at all common.

The main purpose of the EU survey on gender-based violence against women and other forms of inter-personal violence (EU-GBV) is to assess the prevalence of violence in order to address the requirements of the Istanbul Convention. The survey covers psychological, physical and sexual violence by intimate partner, physical and sexual violence by non-partner, sexual harassment at work, violence experienced in childhood and stalking by any perpetrator.

The data collection for the first wave (year 2021) was conducted in voluntary bases and took place between September 2020 and March 2024 in the EU countries, based on their national timetables. Eurostat coordinated data collection in 18 Member States (BE, BG, DK, EE, EL, ES, FR, HR, LV, LT, MT, NL, AT, PL, PT, SI, SK, FI). Additionally, Italy agreed to share data from their national survey on violence against women, but the implementation of the survey was postponed from 2022 to 2024 due to administrative difficulties. The indicators disseminated for Italy are based on the last national survey conducted in 2014, given that the prevalence of gender-based violence is not expected to differ significantly over time, specifically for prevalence of lifetime violence, and the indicators will be updated when 2024 survey results will be available. Moreover, indicators on sexual harassment at work disseminated for Italy are based on the national victimisation survey of 2022-2023. To cover the full EU, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) launched a joint data collection in the eight Member States not covered by Eurostat (CZ, DE, IE, CY, LU, HU, RO, SE) following the EU-GBV manual. Accordingly, data disseminated for wave 2021 and estimated EU-average is based on a joint data collection by Eurostat, FRA and EIGE.

The disseminated indicators focus on violence by perpetrator, disaggregated by type of violence, by time of occurrence, by age and by personal characteristics of the respondent; and on frequency, severity, seriousness and reporting of the experienced violence.

However, it is necessary to point out that survey data might only be a close proxy to real prevalence as survey data depends on the willingness of the respondent to disclose any violence experienced. Therefore, to understand the prevalence of violence and disclosure rates by survey respondents, it is important to take into account the extent to which violence is tolerated in the wider community. For example, in cultures where people are ready to talk about their painful experiences, their answers may reflect more accurately their own experiences rather than community norms. To provide some background on country specific context, few indicators on commonness and awareness of support services are disseminated.

It is essential to avoid using sensitive terms that could cause anxiety or concern when introducing the survey. Accordingly, the general recommendation was that the survey name should be neutral when contacting the respondents. The aim was to avoid alerting any perpetrators of domestic violence to the nature of the survey or frightening off any victims of violence, in order to minimise non-response, as some respondents might be discouraged from taking part if the name of the survey included terms like ‘assault’, ‘sexual violence’, or ‘gender-based violence’.

Majority of countries have followed this recommendation and the title of the survey was translated as survey on health, safety or security and well-being or living conditions; quality of life or relationship survey. Only few countries (BG, SK) used gender-based violence in the title of the survey during data collection and explained that this decision was taken as no issue appeared during testing the survey using the word “violence”, or the word "violence" was used in order to avoid misunderstanding regarding the aim of the survey and to reduce non-response due to the fact that respondents were not aware of the real theme of the survey.

However, the pilot survey results indicate that respondents understood the rationale for the choice of neutral survey name once they had been given an explanation, and agreed that it was right. Due to the sensitivity of the topic, the participating countries were strongly encouraged to include experts on violence against women and/or gender-based violence as well as psychologists and psychotherapists in every step of the survey - from the preparation, through the field work to the data dissemination.

Majority of countries included experts on the topic in the project team: gender statisticians, gender-based violence or violence against women researchers, policy experts, psychologists, social workers, experts working on victim support or NGOs, experts on victimization surveys. External experts were included in the preparation of the survey, training of the interviewers and in order to provide support to the interviewers.

Few countries (MT, FI) established the focus group or expert group consisting of different experts in the field and providing the support to the survey during all phases.

The bi-variable and multivariable Gompertz gamma shared frailty model for predictors of the first Intimate partner violence in SSA.

Human Trafficking Statistics: Human trafficking remains a pervasive global issue, with millions of individuals subjected to exploitation and abuse each year. According to recent statistics, an estimated 25 million people worldwide are victims of human trafficking, with the majority being women and children. This lucrative criminal industry generates profits of over $150 billion annually, making it one of the most profitable illegal trades globally. As market research analysts, it's imperative to understand the scale and impact of human trafficking to develop effective strategies for prevention and intervention. Efforts to combat human trafficking have intensified in recent years, driven by increased awareness and advocacy. However, despite these efforts, the problem persists, with trafficking networks adapting to evade law enforcement and exploit vulnerabilities in communities. Through comprehensive data analysis and research, we can uncover trends, identify high-risk areas, and develop targeted interventions to disrupt trafficking networks and support survivors. In this context, understanding human trafficking statistics is crucial for informing policy decisions, resource allocation, and collaborative efforts to combat this grave violation of human rights. Editor’s Choice Every year, approximately 4.5 billion people become victims of forced sex trafficking. Two out of three immigrants become victims of human trafficking, regardless of their international travel method. There are 5.4 victims of modern slavery for every 1000 people worldwide. An estimated 40.3 million individuals are trapped in modern-day slavery, with 24.9 million in forced labor and 15.4 million in forced marriage. Around 16.55 million reported human trafficking cases have occurred in the Asia Pacific region. Out of 40 million human trafficking victims worldwide, 25% are children. The highest proportion of forced labor trafficking cases occurs in domestic work, accounting for 30%. The illicit earnings from human trafficking amount to approximately USD 150 billion annually. The sex trafficking industry globally exceeds the size of the worldwide cocaine market. Only 0.4% of survivors of human trafficking cases are detected. Currently, there are 49.6 million people in modern slavery worldwide, with 35% being children. Sex trafficking is the most common type of trafficking in the U.S. In 2022, there were 88 million child sexual abuse material (CSAM) files reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) tip line. Child sex trafficking has been reported in all 50 U.S. states. Human trafficking is a USD 150 billion industry globally. It ranks as the second most profitable illegal industry in the United States. 25 million people worldwide are denied their fundamental right to freedom. 30% of global human trafficking victims are children. Women constitute 49% of all victims of global trafficking. In 2019, 62% of victims in the US were identified as sex trafficking victims. In the same year, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grantees reported that 68% of clients served were victims of labor trafficking. Human traffickers in the US face a maximum statutory penalty of 20 years in prison. In France, 74% of exploited victims in 2018 were victims of sex trafficking. You May Also Like To Read Domestic Violence Statistics Sexual Assault Statistics Crime Statistics FBI Crime Statistics Referral Marketing Statistics Prison Statistics GDPR Statistics Piracy Statistics Notable Ransomware Statistics DDoS Statistics Divorce Statistics

Abstract

Violence against women (VAW), in its many forms and manifestations, and across all settings, is a violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Around the world, many women experience violence regardless of age, class, race and ethnicity. Most of this violence is driven by the fact that they are women, and related to gender roles in society. Violence against women is predominately perpetrated by men, and most often by intimate partners. According to most recent global estimates, 35% of women aged 15 years or older globally have experienced physical and/or sexual violence during their lifetime (Devries et al., 2013; WHO, 2013). Intimate partner violence is the leading cause of homicide in women globally (Stockl et al., 2013) and has many other major short- and long-term health consequences (WHO, 2013). The economic and social costs associated with VAW are significant, and global evidence shows that violence consistently undermines development efforts at various levels, affecting physical, human and social capital (WHO, 2005). In Cambodia, the state of research on violence against women points toward widespread experiences of violence across the country (CDHS, 2012; Fulu et al., 21013). Women of all cultures and classes are subjected to many forms of physical, psychological, sexual and economic violence. This includes, but is not limited to intimate partner violence (IPV), rape and sexual assault, sexual harassment, acid violence and trafficking (MoWA, 2008). The Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) has made a strong commitment to addressing violence against women by introducing a number of legislative and policy reforms including domestic violence legislation and a national action plan. Cambodia has demonstrated its strong commitment to promoting gender equality and ending VAW by ratifying several core international human rights conventions. In addition, there is widespread recognition among Cambodian government leaders that having quality data on the prevalence and health and other consequences of different forms of VAW is essential to increase awareness, inform evidencebased programming and policies, including the NAPVAW, and to monitor progress in the implementations of such interventions. Between 2014-2015, to fill the identified knowledge gaps, the Royal Government of Cambodia with support from the World Health Organization (WHO) and UN Women conducted a national prevalence study using the WHO multicountry study methodology. This methodology was selected because it has been widely used and is known to produce reliable data, that can be used for cross-country comparisons, and it adheres to internationally recognized ethical and safety standards.

Specific Objectives: Among specific objectives, the following deserve special mention:

ESTIMATE THE PREVALENCE AND FREQUENCY of different forms of VAW: physical, sexual, emotional and economic violence against women by intimate partners, as well as sexual and physical violence by perpetrators other than partners (in this document also referred to as ‘nonpartners’) since the age of 15, and sexual violence before the age of 15;

DETERMINE THE ASSOCIATION of physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence with a range of health and other outcomes;

IDENTIFY FACTORS that may be associated with either reducing (protective factors) or increasing (risk factors) women’s risk of hysical and/or sexual intimate partner violence; DOCUMENT THE STRATEGIES and services that women use to cope with violence by an intimate partner.

INCREASE NATIONAL CAPACITY and collaboration among researchers and women’s organisations working on domestic violence;

INCREASE AWARENESS about and sensitivity to partner violence among researchers, policymakers and health care providers;

CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT of a network of people committed to addressing

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

• Households
• Individuals

Universe

All resident households in Cambodia

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

• The survey sample design was developed by the NIS in the Ministry of Planning. A multi-stage sampling strategy was used based on a sampling frame that took into consideration the 24 provinces in the country delineated into a total of 225 districts for a total of 14,172 "villages" or 28,701 enumeration areas (EAs) in the country. The sample is self-weighted at the household level.

• The results achieved on VAW 2015 sampling design is already completed and describes as follows: a.Two level of survey results will be produces as: first at National level and second sub-national (Urban and Rural) b.Survey methods of VAW 2015 were designed bases on the three- stage stratified cluster sampling. b1. First stage: selected the sample Enumeration area consisting of 200 sample EAs b2. Second stage: selected the sample households consisting of 4,000 households b3. Selected the sample Women consisting of 4,000 eligible women

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Cleaning operations

The questionnaire was programmed into electronic format using CAPI software, which allowed interviewers to enter the responses to questions directly into the electronic devises that were uploaded on a daily basis. Data entry was therefore not required. The software directly checked internal consistency, range and error checking, and skip patterns of the responses at the point of entering the answers during the interview. The uploaded files were aggregated at a central level and were immediately available for data analysis.

Response rate

Eligible woman response rate: 98% Household response rate: 99.5% Household refused: 0.5%

Sampling error estimates

Sample size calculations: Z (95% Confidence Interval), the value of 1.96 P = 30%. In many countries were data are available, lifetime intimate partner sexual violence often reaches 25-30% and lifetime intimate partner physical violence is 65-70%. In a normal distribution the highest variance for a factor would be at the 50% level (resulting in needing a very large sample) and the lowest variance would be at the extremes (needing the smallest sample). We compromise at 30% which is identical to assuming 70% so the resulting sample size is large, but not unmanageable. DEFF = 2. We have used this value for all the national surveys, to date. E = 0.02291. We calculate the sample size using margin of error 2.291%.

The sample size results are as follow: Confidence Level :1.96 Margin of Error (MOE): 0.02291 Baseline levels of the indicator: 0.3 Design effect (Deff): 2 Sample size (n) - Female: 3,074

The number of family violence crimes in Russia reached **** thousand in 2021, falling by nearly one thousand compared to the previous year. The indicator decreased sharply between 2016 and 2017, when the country's laws decriminalized non-aggravated battery and battery within a family that resulted in no serious harm, unless it took place repeatedly. In total, over **** people became victims of domestic violence crimes in Russia in 2021.

Between 2012 and 2022, there were more men than women among the victims of abuse in Sweden. In 2022, there were 84,000 abuse victims in the country, which was slightly more than the year before. Of these, more than 45,000 were men.

The 2008 National Demographic and Health Survey (2008 NDHS) is a nationally representative survey of 13,594 women age 15-49 from 12,469 households successfully interviewed, covering 794 enumeration areas (clusters) throughout the Philippines. This survey is the ninth in a series of demographic and health surveys conducted to assess the demographic and health situation in the country. The survey obtained detailed information on fertility levels, marriage, fertility preferences, awareness and use of family planning methods, breastfeeding practices, nutritional status of women and young children, childhood mortality, maternal and child health, and knowledge and attitudes regarding HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. Also, for the first time, the Philippines NDHS gathered information on violence against women.

The 2008 NDHS was conducted by the Philippine National Statistics Office (NSO). Technical assistance was provided by ICF Macro through the MEASURE DHS program. Funding for the survey was mainly provided by the Government of the Philippines. Financial support for some preparatory and processing phases of the survey was provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

Like previous Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in the Philippines, the 2008 National Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) was primarily designed to provide information on population, family planning, and health to be used in evaluating and designing policies, programs, and strategies for improving health and family planning services in the country. The 2008 NDHS also included questions on domestic violence. Specifically, the 2008 NDHS had the following objectives:

- Collect data at the national level that will allow the estimation of demographic rates, particularly, fertility rates by urban-rural residence and region, and under-five mortality rates at the national level.
- Analyze the direct and indirect factors which determine the levels and patterns of fertility.
- Measure the level of contraceptive knowledge and practice by method, urban-rural residence, and region.
- Collect data on family health: immunizations, prenatal and postnatal checkups, assistance at delivery, breastfeeding, and prevalence and treatment of diarrhea, fever, and acute respiratory infections among children under five years.
- Collect data on environmental health, utilization of health facilities, prevalence of common noncommunicable and infectious diseases, and membership in health insurance plans.
- Collect data on awareness of tuberculosis.
- Determine women's knowledge about HIV/AIDS and access to HIV testing.
- Determine the extent of violence against women.

MAIN RESULTS

FERTILITY

Fertility Levels and Trends. There has been a steady decline in fertility in the Philippines in the past 36 years. From 6.0 children per woman in 1970, the total fertility rate (TFR) in the Philippines declined to 3.3 children per woman in 2006. The current fertility level in the country is relatively high compared with other countries in Southeast Asia, such as Thailand, Singapore and Indonesia, where the TFR is below 2 children per woman.

Fertility Differentials. Fertility varies substantially across subgroups of women. Urban women have, on average, 2.8 children compared with 3.8 children per woman in rural areas. The level of fertility has a negative relationship with education; the fertility rate of women who have attended college (2.3 children per woman) is about half that of women who have been to elementary school (4.5 children per woman). Fertility also decreases with household wealth: women in wealthier households have fewer children than those in poorer households.

FAMILY PLANNING

Knowledge of Contraception. Knowledge of family planning is universal in the Philippines- almost all women know at least one method of fam-ily planning. At least 90 percent of currently married women have heard of the pill, male condoms, injectables, and female sterilization, while 87 percent know about the IUD and 68 percent know about male sterilization. On average, currently married women know eight methods of family planning.

Unmet Need for Family Planning. Unmet need for family planning is defined as the percentage of currently married women who either do not want any more children or want to wait before having their next birth, but are not using any method of family planning. The 2008 NDHS data show that the total unmet need for family planning in the Philippines is 22 percent, of which 13 percent is limiting and 9 percent is for spacing. The level of unmet need has increased from 17 percent in 2003.

Overall, the total demand for family planning in the Philippines is 73 percent, of which 69 percent has been satisfied. If all of need were satisfied, a contraceptive prevalence rate of about 73 percent could, theoretically, be expected. Comparison with the 2003 NDHS indicates that the percentage of demand satisfied has declined from 75 percent.

MATERNAL HEALTH

Antenatal Care. Nine in ten Filipino mothers received some antenatal care (ANC) from a medical professional, either a nurse or midwife (52 percent) or a doctor (39 percent). Most women have at least four antenatal care visits. More than half (54 percent) of women had an antenatal care visit during the first trimester of pregnancy, as recommended. While more than 90 percent of women who received antenatal care had their blood pressure monitored and weight measured, only 54 percent had their urine sample taken and 47 percent had their blood sample taken. About seven in ten women were informed of pregnancy complications. Three in four births in the Philippines are protected against neonatal tetanus.

Delivery and Postnatal Care. Only 44 percent of births in the Philippines occur in health facilities-27 percent in a public facility and 18 percent in a private facility. More than half (56 percent) of births are still delivered at home. Sixty-two percent of births are assisted by a health professional-35 percent by a doctor and 27 percent by a midwife or nurse. Thirty-six percent are assisted by a traditional birth attendant or hilot. About 10 percent of births are delivered by C-section.

The Department of Health (DOH) recommends that mothers receive a postpartum check within 48 hours of delivery. A majority of women (77 percent) had a postnatal checkup within two days of delivery; 14 percent had a postnatal checkup 3 to 41 days after delivery.

CHILD HEALTH

Childhood Mortality. Childhood mortality continues to decline in the Philippines. Currently, about one in every 30 children in the Philippines dies before his or her fifth birthday. The infant mortality rate for the five years before the survey (roughly 2004-2008) is 25 deaths per 1,000 live births and the under-five mortality rate is 34 deaths per 1,000 live births. This is lower than the rates of 29 and 40 reported in 2003, respectively. The neonatal mortality rate, representing death in the first month of life, is 16 deaths per 1,000 live births. Under-five mortality decreases as household wealth increases; children from the poorest families are three times more likely to die before the age of five as those from the wealthiest families.

There is a strong association between under-five mortality and mother's education. It ranges from 47 deaths per 1,000 live births among children of women with elementary education to 18 deaths per 1,000 live births among children of women who attended college. As in the 2003 NDHS, the highest level of under-five mortality is observed in ARMM (94 deaths per 1,000 live births), while the lowest is observed in NCR (24 deaths per 1,000 live births).

NUTRITION

Breastfeeding Practices. Eighty-eight percent of children born in the Philippines are breastfed. There has been no change in this practice since 1993. In addition, the median durations of any breastfeeding and of exclusive breastfeeding have remained at 14 months and less than one month, respectively. Although it is recommended that infants should not be given anything other than breast milk until six months of age, only one-third of Filipino children under six months are exclusively breastfed. Complementary foods should be introduced when a child is six months old to reduce the risk of malnutrition. More than half of children ages 6-9 months are eating complementary foods in addition to being breastfed.

The Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) guidelines contain specific recommendations for the number of times that young children in various age groups should be fed each day as well as the number of food groups from which they should be fed. NDHS data indicate that just over half of children age 6-23 months (55 percent) were fed according to the IYCF guidelines.

HIV/AIDS

Awareness of HIV/AIDS. While over 94 percent of women have heard of AIDS, only 53 percent know the two major methods for preventing transmission of HIV (using condoms and limiting sex to one uninfected partner). Only 45 percent of young women age 15-49 know these two methods for preventing HIV transmission. Knowledge of prevention methods is higher in urban areas than in rural areas and increases dramatically with education and wealth. For example, only 16 percent of women with no education know that using condoms limits the risk of HIV infection compared with 69 percent of those who have attended college.

TUBERCULOSIS

Knowledge of TB. While awareness of tuberculosis (TB) is high, knowledge of its causes and symptoms is less common. Only 1 in 4 women know that TB is caused by microbes, germs or bacteria. Instead, respondents tend to say that TB is caused by smoking or drinking alcohol, or that it is inherited. Symptoms associated

Abstract

The National Study on Gender-based Violence in Mongolia consisted of two separate components: a quantitative study based on the methodology developed for the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women; and a qualitative study based on the methodologies adapted from other countries. The use of qualitative and quantitative components was to seek results that cross-checked and complemented each other.

THE STUDY SOUGHT TO: - Obtain information about reliable estimates of the prevalence and incidence of different forms of violence against women (including the estimation of the United Nations VAW indicators and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators 5.2.1. and 5.2.2.) in a way that is comparable with other studies around the world using the WHO methodology; - Assess the extent to which intimate partner violence is associated with a range of health and other outcomes; - Identify factors that may either protect or put women at risk of partner violence; and - Document and compare the strategies and services that women use to deal with partner violence.

Although the study focuses on collecting data on physical and sexual violence by a current or former intimate partner, it also explores aspects of emotional, economic and other abuse by intimate partners and sexual and physical violence by perpetrators other than partners, including sexual abuse before the age of 15. The study also aimed to obtain these results for national and regional levels, for urban and rural areas, as well as age groups, educational levels and socioeconomic status.

Geographic coverage

National coverage

Analysis unit

Household and only woman members

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Sample Design The sample design was done by the NSO Sampling and Analysis Division. A multi-stage sampling strategy was used and the initial target size of the sample was 7,145 households. Considering the probability of non-response due the sensitive nature of the survey, the sample size was increased to 7,860 households, assuming a non-response rate of 10 per cent.

The sample size was designed to produce reliable estimates at national level and with margins of error less than 10 per cent at urban/rural level, and less than 20 per cent at province level.

The sampling frame includes units from all 21 provinces and nine districts of the capital city. Khesegs (parts of sub-districts in the capital city) and baghs (the smallest administrative unit in provinces) were selected as Primary Sampling Units (PSUs). Data was collected from a total of 524 PSUs covering 104 khesegs and 420 baghs, and 15 households were selected from each PSUs.

Stratification The population was divided into a total of 29 strata. Twenty one provinces and eight districts of the capital city were considered as separate strata (the outskirts districts of Baganuur and Bagakhangai in Ulaanbaatar were merged to become one stratum).

First stage - Selection of Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) Twenty clusters (PSUs) in each of the 21 provinces (420 total) and 13 in each of the Ulaanbaatar districts were selected (104 total). Within each stratum, the clusters were selected with a probability proportional to size (PPS).

Second stage - Household selection After selecting the PSUs, the list of households belonging to each PSU was prepared. Fifteen households were selected from each PSU based on a systematic random sampling method.

Third stage - Only one woman was chosen from each household as a respondent Eligible women were those aged between 15 and 64 years and either a resident of the household (living there for more than four weeks) or lives with the family for five out of seven days of the week. In cases where there was more than one woman eligible for participation, the Kish grid method was used to randomly select one of them.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The survey questionnaire, questionnaire rules and other process guidelines were developed based on the WHO standards and methodology. The work to adapt, translate and approve the survey questionnaire and guidelines was done by the members of the Advisory Panel, international advisors and the NSO's survey team. Prior to the finalization of the questionnaire, the quality of materials and the software to be used in the field were checked through pilot testing. Initial pilot testing took place in February 2017 involving 36 households from Ulaanbaatar's Songinokhaikhan and Bayanzurkh duuregs. Another pilot was undertaken in Dundgovi and Orkhon provinces in March 2017, involving 60 households in Gurvansaikhan, Saintsagaan, Bayan-Undur and Jargalant districts.

Based on the results of the pilot tests, the questionnaire was updated by adding new questions, improving the wording and ensuring the questions flowed logically. The survey workplan was also modified. The questionnaire was then circulated among stakeholders, including relevant Ministries, international organizations, civil society organizations and Advisory Panel members, and their suggestions incorporated to finalize the questionnaire. The pilot testing and stakeholder review also helped determine the average time needed to complete an interview and work out a practical daily workload for enumerators.

The survey questionnaire consisted of the following five parts: 1. General questionnaire 2. Household selection form 3. Household questionnaire 4. Woman's consent form 5. Woman's questionnaire

Cleaning operations

Data validation began in July 2017, including manual checking of unit records, data compilation, checking for any logical and entry errors, and calculation of weights. CSPro software had been used to design the data entry system for use on tablets. The final consolidated database was then exported to SPSS and STATA formats for data analysis. Standard variables and tables were derived, and the main outputs reviewed by UNFPA international advisors. Preliminary estimates at national level were produced and shared with stakeholders for discussion and validation between August and October 2017.

Abstract

Violence against children under 18 years of age is a major human rights violation and social and health problem throughout the world. Generally, child abuse is divided into three major categories: physical, emotional, and sexual, all of which can have significant short- and long-term health consequences for children. These include injury, sexual and reproductive health problems, unintended pregnancy, increased risk of HIV, mental health issues, alcohol and drug abuse, social ostracism, and increased incidence of chronic disease in adulthood. Those who have experienced childhood violence are more likely to engage in risk behaviors as adolescents and adults, and may be more likely to become perpetrators themselves.

The key objectives of Cambodia VACS are:

• To estimate the national prevalence of physical, emotional and sexual violence perpetrated against boys and girls, including touching without permission, attempted sexual intercourse, physically forced sexual intercourse, and pressured sexual intercourse perpetrated against boys and girls prior to turning age 18 and more recently;

• To identify risk and protective factors for physical, emotional and sexual violence against children to inform stakeholders and guide prevention efforts;

• To identify the health and social consequences associated with violence against children;

• To assess the knowledge and utilization of medical, psychosocial, legal, and protective services available for children who have experienced sexual, emotional and physical violence;

• To identify areas for further research; and

• To make recommendations to the Government of Cambodia and international and local partners on developing, improving and enhancing prevention and response strategies to address violence against children as part of a larger, comprehensive, multi-sectoral approach to child protection.

Geographic coverage

National Urban and rural areas Twenty (20) domains:

1. Banteay Meanchey
2. Battambang
3. Kampong Cham
4. Kampong Chhnang
5. Kampong Speu
6. Kampong Thom
7. Kampot
8. Kandal
9. Kratie
10. Phnom Penh
11. Preah Vihear
12. Prey Veng
13. Pursat
14. Ratanak Kiri
15. Siem Reap
16. Sihanoukville
17. Stung Treng
18. Svay Rieng
19. Takeo
20. Oddar Meanchey

Analysis unit

Household Individual (Eligible from 13-24 years old)

Universe

Children aged 13-24 years old, male and female, who have been victims of physical, emotional, and sexual violence

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

VACS 2013 makes use of a four-stage cluster sample survey design. In the first stage, a total of 225 villages were selected using probability proportional to size with an allocation by urbanization (27% urban/ 73% rural). In stage 2, enumeration areas known as EAs - the primary sampling units based on geographical subdivisions in Cambodia determined by the department of demographic statistics, censuses and surveys - were selected. The 225 sample EAs were gendered (106 female and 119 male EAs) and one EA was randomly selected from each of the 225 sampled villages. In stage 3, a fixed number of 25 households were selected by equal probability systematic sampling from each selected EA. In stage 4, one eligible respondent (female or male depending on the EA) was randomly selected from the list of all eligible respondents (females or males) 13-24 years of age in each household.

The sampling frame was originally compiled by the National Institute of Statistics for the national population census in 2013. In preparation for several national surveys, the sampling frame was updated in 2012 and takes into account the 2011 reclassification of urban areas in Cambodia.

To calculate separate male and female prevalence estimates for violence victimization, a split sample was used. This means that the survey for females was conducted in different EAs than the survey for males. The split sample approach serves to protect the confidentiality of respondents, and eliminates the chance that a male perpetrator of a sexual assault and the female who was the victim of his sexual assault in the same community would both be interviewed. The design also eliminates the chance that a female perpetrator and a male victim of sexual violence from the same community would both be interviewed.

Prior to the implementation of the survey, a mapping and listing team, primarily composed of supervisors identified for the actual survey, visited all of the randomly selected EAs from the second stage of sampling. It was necessary to map and list all structures within each EA. After the list was constructed, a cluster of 25 households, based on sample size estimates, were selected using either simple random selection, or systematic selection with a random start.

During survey implementation, 25 households were randomly selected in each EA. Upon entering a randomly selected household, interviewers were tasked to identify the head of household or the person representing the head of household in order to introduce the study and complete a household list to determine eligibility of household members to participate in the study. The head of household were requested to participate in a short (15 minute) survey to assess the socio-economic conditions of the household (Appendices W/AA). When there was more than one eligible participant, the interviewer randomly selected one respondent using the Kish Method. If there was no eligible participant, the household was still requested to participate in the household questionnaire. In the case that the head of household is a female or male 13-24 years old, she or he was included in the household listing and may be selected as the respondent. In this case, she or he completed the household questionnaire and the respondent questionnaire. If the selected respondent was not available after three attempts or refused to participate, the household was skipped regardless of whether another eligible respondent existed in the household, thus, the household was not replaced.

For more details please refer to the technical document IRB Protocol VACS Cambodia Final.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The development of a standardized global questionnaire was led by CDC scientists with extensive external consultation. A broad range of academic background and subject-matter expertise is represented in the team at CDC and among the external consultants who developed this tool. The questionnaire draws questions and definitions from a number of well-respected survey tools which has the benefit of (a) being able to compare data on various measures with other studies as a useful validation and an interesting comparison and (b) using measures that have already been field tested in other studies. In addition, the questionnaire has been previously implemented in five other countries (i.e. Swaziland, Tanzania, Kenya, Zimbabwe and Haiti) after being adapted based on vital country-level review by stakeholders.

The following international and violence surveys helped to inform the questionnaire: - Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey (CDHS) - National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Surveillance System (NISVSS) - The Child Sexual Assault Survey (CSA) - Longitudinal Studies of Child Abuse and Neglect (LONGSCAN) - ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool (ICAST) - HIV/AIDS/STD Behavioral Surveillance Surveys (BSS) - Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) - National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) - World Health Organization (WHO) Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women - Behavioral Risk Fact Surveillance System (BRFSS) - Hopkins Symptoms Checklist - ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool (ICAST)

The questionnaire has been further adapted for Cambodia (Appendices W/AA, X/BB, Y/CC). Consultation with key informants from Cambodia and input from stakeholders participating in the Technical Working Group on Questionnaire Development (part of the Steering Committee), who are familiar with the problem of violence against children, child protection, and the cultural context, helped to further adapt the questionnaire and survey protocol for Cambodia.

The questionnaire includes the following topics: demographics; parental relations, family, friends and community support, school experiences, sexual behavior and practices; physical, emotional, and sexual violence; perpetration of sexual violence, health outcomes associated with exposure to violence; and utilization and barriers to health services. The background characteristics of the study respondents and the head of household survey include questions that assess age, socio-economic status, marital status, work status, education, and living situation. The sexual behavior and HIV/AIDS component utilizes questions from the CDHS, BSS, and WHO Multi-country study. Sexual behavior questions are divided among the following topics: sexual behavior, including sex in exchange for money or goods, pregnancy, and HIV/AIDS testing. The sexual violence module, the primary focus of the study, includes questions on the types of sexual violence experienced and important information on the circumstances of these incidents, such as the settings where sexual violence occurred and the relationship between the victim and perpetrator. This information will be collected on the first and most recent incidents of sexual violence, which will include a question on whether sexual violence occurred within the past 12-months. In addition, we developed several questions assessing potential risk and protective factors, including attitudes around sexual violence. Some of these questions were based on DHS, YRBS, and Add Health. We also ask

The 2008-09 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) is a population and health survey that Kenya conducts every five years. It was designed to provide data to monitor the population and health situation in Kenya and also to be used as a follow-up to the previous KDHS surveys in 1989, 1993, 1998, and 2003. From the current survey, information was collected on fertility levels; marriage; sexual activity; fertility preferences; awareness and use of family planning methods; breastfeeding practices; nutritional status of women and young children; childhood and maternal mortality; maternal and child health; and awareness and behaviour regarding HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections. The 2008-09 KDHS is the second survey to collect data on malaria and the use of mosquito nets, domestic violence, and HIV testing of adults. The specific objectives of the 2008-09 KDHS were to: Provide data, at the national and provincial levels, that allow the derivation of demographic rates, particularly fertility and childhood mortality rates, to be used to evaluate the achievements of the current national population policy for sustainable development Measure changes in fertility and contraceptive prevalence use and study the factors that affect these changes, such as marriage patterns, desire for children, availability of contraception, breastfeeding habits, and other important social and economic factors Examine the basic indicators of maternal and child health in Kenya, including nutritional status, use of antenatal and maternity services, treatment of recent episodes of childhood illness, use of immunisation services, use of mosquito nets, and treatment of children and pregnant women for malaria Describe the patterns of knowledge and behaviour related to the transmission of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections Estimate adult and maternal mortality ratios at the national level Ascertain the extent and pattern of domestic violence and female genital cutting in the country Estimate the prevalence of HIV infection at the national and provincial levels and by urban-rural residence, and use the data to corroborate the rates from the sentinel surveillance system The 2008-09 KDHS information provides data to assist policymakers and programme implementers as they monitor and evaluate existing programmes and design new strategies for demographic, social, and health policies in Kenya. The data will be useful in many ways, including the monitoring of the country’s achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. As in 2003, the 2008-09 KDHS survey was designed to cover the entire country, including the arid and semi-arid districts, and especially those areas in the northern part of the country that were not covered in the earlier KDHS surveys. The survey collected information on demographic and health issues from a sample of women at the reproductive age of 15-49 and from a sample of men age 15-54 years in a one-in-two subsample of households.

This statistic presents public perception on frequency of domestic violence against men in the European Union (EU) in 2016. In total, ** percent of those surveyed believed that domestic violence against men was common in their country. By contrast, ** percent of respondents thought it was not at all common.