In 2023, there were 10,603 female organ donors in the United States. Organ donation can be given through both a deceased and living donor if blood and oxygen are flowing through the organs until the time of recovery to ensure viability. There are over 100,000 people in the country waiting for an organ transplant. This statistic displays the number of organ donors in the United States by gender, from 1988 to 2024.

Consumer Donation Data. With over 30 years of expertise in political and charitable fundraising, this dataset represents an invaluable resource for organizations seeking to engage donors who demonstrate exceptional responsiveness and loyalty. Focused primarily on Democratic political fundraising, the data captures the behavior and preferences of telemarketing donors, who are widely recognized as the most versatile and high-performing contributors across multiple fundraising channels.

Telemarketing donors stand out for their robust engagement, transitioning effectively to direct mail and digital campaigns while maintaining higher retention and giving levels compared to donors acquired solely through other channels. This dataset highlights donor behavior patterns, including frequency of contributions, average gift size, and long-term engagement metrics, offering insights into donor lifetime value and campaign effectiveness.

Beyond political applications, this data is equally valuable for charitable organizations looking to optimize their outreach strategies and improve donor acquisition and retention. By leveraging these insights, organizations can identify key demographic and psychographic trends, refine messaging, and maximize ROI on fundraising efforts.

Ideal for Democratic campaigns, political action committees, nonprofit organizations, and analytics teams, this dataset provides actionable intelligence to elevate fundraising initiatives, strengthen donor relationships, and drive meaningful impact. Whether for identifying high-value donors or building targeted campaigns, this data is a proven cornerstone for effective fundraising strategies.

Pursuant to the Affiliated Not-for-Profits Law, found in Chapter 9 of Title 3 of the New York City Administrative Code, a not-for-profit organization affiliated with an elected official must report to COIB annually information about certain donations received. Specifically, “restricted" organizations (that is, organizations that spend at least 10% of their expenditures on communications featuring the name, voice, or likeness of the affiliated elected official) are required to report information about any donation from the household of a person listed in the City’s Doing Business Database, as well as any other donation of $1,000 or more. All other "unrestricted" organizations are required to report information about donations of $5,000 or more. This dataset includes the names of donors; the value of the donation; the date of the donation; and a description of the donation.

The statistic shows the percentage donors giving online from 2007 to 2010. In 2009, 14 percent of first time donors donated online.

Trust Fund is a financing arrangement set up with contributions from one or more external donor(s), and/or World Bank Group and disburses funds to the recipients or to the Bank to support development related activities. The World Bank Group is normally responsible for all financial and programmatic functions of a Trust Fund, including oversight of the operational use of the funding. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the World Bank as Administrator/Trustee complies with relevant agreement entered into with the donors and internal policies applicable to the World Bank Group. The TF resources are used to support the Bank’s own work program through Bank-executed trust funds (BETFs) and funds are also provided to third party executing agencies through Recipient-executed trust funds (RETFs). Financial Intermediary Funds (FIFs) comprise of trust funds not covered by either the BETFs or RETFs categories in which the Bank provides specific administrative or financial services with a limited fiduciary or operational role. The dataset provided information on the Contribution paid-in by a Donor to a Trust Fund, as specified in the Administration Agreement/ Arrangement, or in the Instrument of Commitment. The information is available by fiscal year from 2012 onwards.

Individual charitable donors; Average and median charitable donations of tax filers by age (preliminary T1 Family File; T1FF)

Direct Marketing Data. With over 30 years of expertise in political and charitable fundraising, this dataset represents an invaluable resource for organizations seeking to engage donors who demonstrate exceptional responsiveness and loyalty. Focused primarily on Democratic political fundraising, the data captures the behavior and preferences of telemarketing donors, who are widely recognized as the most versatile and high-performing contributors across multiple fundraising channels.

Telemarketing donors stand out for their robust engagement, transitioning effectively to direct mail and digital campaigns while maintaining higher retention and giving levels compared to donors acquired solely through other channels. This dataset highlights donor behavior patterns, including frequency of contributions, average gift size, and long-term engagement metrics, offering insights into donor lifetime value and campaign effectiveness.

Beyond political applications, this data is equally valuable for charitable organizations looking to optimize their outreach strategies and improve donor acquisition and retention. By leveraging these insights, organizations can identify key demographic and psychographic trends, refine messaging, and maximize ROI on fundraising efforts.

Ideal for Democratic campaigns, political action committees, nonprofit organizations, and analytics teams, this dataset provides actionable intelligence to elevate fundraising initiatives, strengthen donor relationships, and drive meaningful impact. Whether for identifying high-value donors or building targeted campaigns, this data is a proven cornerstone for effective fundraising strategies.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Donors Inc.

Donation Management Software Market size is growing at a faster pace with substantial growth rates over the last few years and is estimated that the market will grow significantly in the forecasted period i.e. 2024 to 2031.

Donation Management Software Market Drivers

Growing Adoption of Digital Solutions in Nonprofits: Nonprofit organizations are increasingly adopting digital tools to streamline their operations and enhance their fundraising efforts. Donation management software helps these organizations efficiently manage donations, donor relationships, and fundraising campaigns, driving market growth.

Rising Demand for Efficient Fundraising: As competition for donor funds intensifies, nonprofits are seeking more effective ways to manage and optimize their fundraising strategies. Donation management software provides advanced features like donor segmentation, automated communication, and detailed analytics, which improve fundraising efficiency and effectiveness.

Increasing Focus on Transparency and Accountability: Donors today expect greater transparency and accountability from nonprofit organizations. Donation management software enables organizations to track and report on donations more accurately, providing donors with confidence in how their contributions are being used, which enhances trust and encourages more giving.

Individuals are the single largest source of campaign contributions, yet we know little about their motivations. For instance, the existing literature questions whether individual contributors sophisticatedly differentiate among candidates according to policy positions, particularly among same-party candidates. We analyze this issue by combining data from a new survey of over 2,800 in- and out-of-state donors associated with the 2012 Senate elections, FEC data on contributors’ professions, and legislative records. Three major findings emerge. First, policy agreement between a donor’s positions and senator’s roll calls significantly influences the likelihood of giving, even for same-party contributors. Second, there is a significant effect of committee membership corresponding to a donor’s occupation; this holds even for donors who claim that other motivations dominate, but does not appear to be motivated by an expectation of access. Third, conditional upon a donation occurring, its size is determined by factors outside a legislator’s control.

The states with the highest donor designation rates include Colorado, Michigan, and Arkansas. This statistic shows the estimated donor designation rate of select U.S. states. For example, it is estimated that 69 percent of the adult population in Colorado say "yes" to donation when given the opportunity during a motor vehicle department transaction.

Organ donors in the U.S.

In total, in 2018, there were around 17,569 organ donors in the U.S. Organs can be donated from living and deceased donors depending on the organ. Commonly transplanted organs include the liver, kidney, heart, and lungs. In recent years, there have been more organ donations from men than women, but donations from both sexes have increased over the past few decades.

The waiting list

Although the number of organ donations has increased there are still over 112,000 candidates waiting for organ transplants in the U.S. Over 94,700 of these candidates are waiting for a kidney transplant, making it by far the most needed organ. The age group with the largest number of individuals on the waiting list for a transplant is those aged 50 to 64 years, with younger people in much less need for transplants.

anumber of epitopes recognized by the donor.bnd, not done.

Postmortem human brain donor characteristics.

Pursuant to the City's Legal Defense Trusts Law, found in Chapter 11 of Title 3 of the New York City Administrative Code, a public servant (or someone acting on behalf of a public servant) may set up a legal defense trust to raise funds to pay for certain legal bills and expenses connected with the public servant’s City employment. This dataset lists information about donations made to legal defense trusts in accordance with the City's Legal Defense Trusts Law. Specifically, it includes the names and addresses of all persons who made a donation of $100 or more; the date of the donation; the value of the donation; and, if applicable, a description of an in-kind donation or pro bono assistance. For more information about legal defense trusts and the laws that govern them, visit https://www.nyc.gov/site/coib/the-law/legal-defense-trusts-law.page.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) in World was reported at 11827180004 USD in 2022, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. World - Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on March of 2025.

The survey shows the distribution of new U.S. donors in 2010 by channel. In that year, 16 percent of new donors joined online.

Palau PW: Net Bilateral Aid Flows from Development Assistance Committee Donors: Germany data was reported at 0.010 USD mn in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.070 USD mn for 2015. Palau PW: Net Bilateral Aid Flows from Development Assistance Committee Donors: Germany data is updated yearly, averaging 0.080 USD mn from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.340 USD mn in 1994 and a record low of 0.010 USD mn in 2016. Palau PW: Net Bilateral Aid Flows from Development Assistance Committee Donors: Germany data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Palau – Table PW.World Bank.WDI: Defense and Official Development Assistance. Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.; ; Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, and International Development Statistics database. Data are available online at: www.oecd.org/dac/stats/idsonline.; Sum;

While delegation to international organizations has received substantial attention in the international relations literature, the issues of institutional choice and delegation levels remain understudied. Existing research examines donor countries' decision to distribute aid bilaterally or turn to a multilateral organization; this article shifts the focus toward a closely related, but often overlooked, decision that donors need to make—that is, they select an agent from a range of international organizations and determine the level of delegation to a given agent. I argue that in their delegation decisions, donors are guided not only by standard calculations of delegation costs and benefits, but also by policies that international development agencies adopt and implement. These policies are shaped by member governments' preferences, and a donor country will delegate more to the organizations whose members have foreign policy preferences more in line with the donor country's own preferences, ceteris paribus. The article presents a set of empirical tests that lend support to this argument. Cross-country data on European development aid given during the period 1960–2000 are used in the analyses.

This is the replication data for a replication paper on "More Donors, More Democracy?"

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) in Georgia was reported at 59610001 USD in 2022, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Georgia - Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on March of 2025.