Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 12/22/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: This plan was officially adopted on December 22, 2021 as the official Congressional Final Draft Map. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

The Government’s Housing For All – A New Housing Plan for Ireland proposed a new tax to activate vacant land for residential purposes as a part of the Pathway to Increasing New Housing Supply. The Residential Zoned Land Tax was introduced by the Finance Act 2021.

The dataset contains the land identified as being considered liable for the tax in 2026 from all of the local authorities in the state. The available datasets will comprise the annual draft maps, published on 1 February 2025. Previous datasets relating to the mapping process so far are also available, including the draft map dataset published 1 November 2022; supplemental map dataset published 1 May 2023; final map published 1 December 2023, annual draft map for 2025 published 1 February 2024 and final map for 2025 published 31 January 2025.

The final map represents the most recent dataset of land liable to the tax, while the annual draft map for 2026 indicates existing liable land, new land considered to be liable in 2026 and land which is now considered to be out of liability and which will be removed from the next final map in 2026.


Certain settlements will not be identified due to lack of capacity or services or due to out of date zonings.

The dataset contains data which will allow identification of the amount in hectares of zoned serviced land within settlements.

Terms of use:

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ [creativecommons.org]

The Amber Map responds to the direction of the Independent Redistricting Commission to create a draft map that has a high level of continuity with the existing council district boundaries and includes changes only as needed to meet the six universal map criteria. The universal criteria are: Maximum of 10% population deviation; Contiguous districts; Maintain Communities of Interest and Neighborhoods; Use major arterial streets as boundaries where possible; Correct the features of the 2010 map that accounted for prior Councilmember residences; and Include at least one compact student district in every map.Version two of the Amber Map also responds to the Commission direction to adjust the border between District 3 and District 8 near Ashby BART.The Amber Map follows the Commission direction by making the following noteworthy modifications:Move the border between District 3 and District 8 east from Adeline Street to Shattuck Avenue to include the Ed Roberts Campus, the Ashby BART east lot, and St. Paul AME Church in District 3.Unify the Westbrae Neighborhood in District 1;Unify the Poets Corner Neighborhood in District 2;Unify the LeConte Neighborhood in District 3;Unify the Lorin Neighborhood in District 3;Unify the Halcyon Neighborhood in District 8;Unify the Bateman Neighborhood in District 8;Unify the Willard Neighborhood in District 8;Unify Lower Spruce/Arch Street with the Northside Neighborhood in District 6;Move the census block that contains the International House from District 8 to the existing student district (District 7);Correct map features for prior Councilmember residences in District 4 and District 7;Maximize the use of the major arterials, University Avenue, Telegraph Avenue, Sacramento Street, Spruce Street, Oxford Street, and Cedar Street, as council district boundaries;Commission direction on topography/wildfire risk/transit access is reflected in higher elevation neighborhoods contained in two council districts (6, 8).

The Government’s Housing For All – A New Housing Plan for Ireland proposed a new tax to activate vacant land for residential purposes as a part of the Pathway to Increasing New Housing Supply. The Residential Zoned Land Tax was introduced by the Finance Act 2021. The dataset contains the land identified as being considered liable for the tax in 2026 from all of the local authorities in the state. The available datasets will comprise the annual draft maps, published on 1 February 2025. Previous datasets relating to the mapping process so far are also available, including the draft map dataset published 1 November 2022; supplemental map dataset published 1 May 2023; final map published 1 December 2023, annual draft map for 2025 published 1 February 2024 and final map for 2025 published 31 January 2025. The final map represents the most recent dataset of land liable to the tax, while the annual draft map for 2026 indicates existing liable land, new land considered to be liable in 2026 and land which is now considered to be out of liability and which will be removed from the next final map in 2026. Certain settlements will not be identified due to lack of capacity or services or due to out of date zonings. The dataset contains data which will allow identification of the amount in hectares of zoned serviced land within settlements. Terms of use: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ [creativecommons.org]

The UAS Facility Maps are designed to identify permissible altitudes (above ground level) at which UAS, operating under the Small UAS Rule (14 CFR 107), can be authorized to fly within the surface areas of controlled airspace. These altitude parameters, provided by the respective air traffic control facilities, are criteria used to evaluate airspace authorization requests (14 CFR 107.41), submitted via FAA.GOV/UAS. Airspace authorization requests for altitudes in excess of the predetermined map parameters will require a lengthy coordination process. This dataset will be continually updated and expanded to include UAS Facility Maps for all controlled airspace by Fall 2017. This map is not updated in real time. Neither the map nor the information provided herein is guaranteed to be current or accurate. Reliance on this map constitutes neither FAA authorization to operate nor evidence of compliance with applicable aviation regulations in or during enforcement proceedings before the National Transportation Safety Board or any other forum. Disclaimer of Liability. The United States government will not be liable to you in respect of any claim, demand, or action—irrespective of the nature or cause of the claim, demand, or action—alleging any loss, injury, or damages, direct or indirect, that may result from the use or possession of any of the information in this draft map or any loss of profit, revenue, contracts, or savings or any other direct, indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages arising out of any use of or reliance upon any of the information in this draft map, whether in an action in contract or tort or based on a warranty, even if the FAA has been advised of the possibility of such damages. The FAA’s total aggregate liability with respect to its obligations under this agreement or otherwise with respect to the use of this draft map or any information herein will not exceed $0. Some States, Territories, and Countries do not allow certain liability exclusions or damages limitations; to the extent of such disallowance and only to that extent, the paragraph above may not apply to you. In the event that you reside in a State, Territory, or Country that does not allow certain liability exclusions or damages limitations, you assume all risks attendant to the use of any of the information in this draft map in consideration for the provision of such information. Export Control. You agree not to export from anywhere any of the information in this draft map except in compliance with, and with all licenses and approvals required under, applicable export laws, rules, and regulations. Indemnity. You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold free and harmless the United States government from and against any liability, loss, injury (including injuries resulting in death), demand, action, cost, expense, or claim of any kind or character, including but not limited to attorney’s fees, arising out of or in connection with any use or possession by you of this draft map or the information herein. Governing Law. The above terms and conditions will be governed by the laws of each and every state within the United States, without giving effect to that state’s conflict-of-laws provisions. You agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the state or territory in which the relevant use of any of the information in this draft map occurred for any and all disputes, claims, and actions arising from or in connection with this draft map or the information herein.

The Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) Database depicts flood risk information and supporting data used to develop the risk data. The primary risk classifications used are the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event, the 0.2-percent-annual-chance flood event, and areas of minimal flood risk. The DFIRM Database is derived from Flood Insurance Studies (FISs), previously published Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), flood hazard analyses performed in support of the FISs and FIRMs, and new mapping data, where available. The FISs and FIRMs are published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The file is georeferenced to earth's surface using the State Plane projection and coordinate system. The specifications for the horizontal control of DFIRM data files are consistent with those required for mapping at a scale of 1:12,000.

Abstract for the final talk in the earthquake hazard map session planned for the 2011 AEES meeting.

These data were collected on the SIPEX II voyage of the Aurora Australis in 2012.

These data are floe-scale maps of Antarctic sea ice draft (m). These were collected using a multibeam instrument attached to an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). This AUV was the WHOI 'SeaBED-class' vehicle named 'Jaguar'. Details on the deployment and processing of this data can be found in Williams, Maksym and Wilkinson et al., 2014 (Nature Geoscience).

Data are provided for SIPEX-II stations 3, 4 and 6.

Station 3: October 3 2012, located at 121.03E 64.95S

Station 4: October 9 2012, located at 120.87E 65.13S

Station 6: October 12 2012, located at 120.02E 65.25S

Data are provided on grids with 50cm horizontal spatial resolution. For each station, the mean and variance of the sea ice draft, along with the number of observations in each grid cell, are provided. Data are provided in ESRI ASCII grid format and comma-separated (CSV) text files. CSV files do not include grid cells with no observations.

Ocean circulation beneath ice shelves and associated rates of melting and freezing are influenced strongly by water column thickness and depth. The shape of the cavity beneath the Amery Ice Shelf is important for our understanding of ice shelf stability and freshwater input to the ocean and their dependence on climate. New seismic surveys of the centre region of the Amery Ice Shelf and ice-draft data taken at the grounding line has provided a considerable amount of new water-column thickness and bathymetry data. The data is adjusted in the unknown region south of 71 degrees 35 minutes S by comparing the complex error between simulated tides against in situ GPS observations. A finite element, hydrodynamic ocean tide model is used to simulate the 4 major constituents (S2, M2, K1 and O1). The new data differs from a previous bathymetry map in a number of places. Significantly, there is channel that leads from the Prydz bay depression into the deepest part of the AIS cavity in the south through a series of depressions. This technique has particular application when the water column beneath ice shelves is inaccessible and in situ GPS data is available.

Transpower New Zealand transmission lines by voltage and type. Transmission Lines is a polyline dataset representing the power lines that are used to transmit electric power across NZ, usually from a power generating station to main substations that make up the National Grid. They are comprised of overhead and underground conducting lines of either copper or aluminium. In NZ these High Voltage (HV) transmission lines operate at kiloVoltages (kV) of 33, 66, 110, 220 AC and 350 DC. (Transmission Line is not a topological network.) (Spans are a sub-set of the Transmission Lines data set. Spans record the structure from / to and the length between the structures). The Transmission Lines dataset is updated ad-hocly.

Vegetation mapping of the Putty Valley. For more information see: DECC (2008) The Native Vegetation of the Putty Valley. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW, Hurstville. This report describes and maps the native vegetation communities of the Putty Valley, situated on the northern border of the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment. It aims to provide the technical information and supporting mapping resources to assist the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment Management Authority (HNCMA) to meet biodiversity targets under the Catchment Action Plan. In particular the results of this mapping project will assist both HNCMA and DECC in guiding recovery planning efforts under the NSW Threatened Species Priorities Action Statement for a number of endangered ecological communities and species. The provision of detailed vegetation mapping data in the Putty Valley area contributes to the establishment of a consistent catchment wide vegetation. It is the first time the native vegetation of the study area has been surveyed and described in detail. Classification and mapping work completed for this project extends the extensive survey and mapping efforts DECC has undertaken in the surrounding reserve system. Together with other work, these data will form the basis for a consistent catchment wide vegetation map and resource. The Putty Valley study area comprises almost 40 000 hectares of private, State Forest and crown land tenures. This study has undertaken detailed survey involving over 50 systematic field sites and detailed mapping and traverse using 1:25 000 scale aerial photography. Field survey recorded over 500 native species, of which one, Rutidosis heterogama, is listed under the NSW Threatened Species Act, 1995. Analysis of data identified 20 native vegetation communities in the study area. Three endangered ecological communities listed under the NSW Threatened Species Act, 1995 were also identified. Each are associated with the alluvial valleys of the study area and include River-flat eucalypt forest, Swamp Sclerophyll Forest and Freshwater Wetlands on coastal floodplains of the NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin Forest and South East Corner Bioregions. VIS_ID 4174

Plan submitted by: redistrictadmin on 10/28/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: This plan was officially adopted on October 28, 2021 as the official Congressional Draft Map. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: N/A

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. James W. Sewall Company developed a complete GIS coverage for the park and revised the preliminary vegetation map classes to better match the results from the cluster analysis and NMS ordination. Polygons representing vegetation stands were digitized on-screen in ArcGIS 8.3, and later in ArcMap 9.1 and 9.2, using lines drawn on the acetate overlays, base layers of 1:8,000 CIR aerial photography, orthorectified photo composite image, and plot location and data. The minimum map unit used was 0.5 ha (1.24 ac). Stereo pairs were used to double check stand signatures during the digitizing process. Photo interpretation and polygon digitization extended outside the NPS boundary, especially where vegetation units were arbitrarily truncated by the boundary. Each polygon was attributed with the name of a vegetation map class or an Anderson Level II land use category based on plot data, field observations, aerial photography signatures, and topographic maps. Data fields identifying the USNVC association inclusions within the vegetation map class were attributed to the vegetation polygons in the shapefile. The GIS coverages and shapefiles were projected to Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Zone 19 North American Datum 1983 (NAD83). FGDC compliant metadata (FGDC 1998a) were created with the NPS-MP ESRI extension and included with the vegetation map shapefile. A photointerpretation key to the map classes for the 2006 draft vegetation map is included as Appendix A. The composite vegetation coverage was clipped to the NPS 2002 MIMA boundary shapefile for accuracy assessment (AA). After the 2006 vegetation map was completed, the thematic accuracy of this map was assessed.

Geoscience Australia is currently drafting a new Australian Earthquake Hazard Map (or more correctly a series of maps) using modern methods and models. Among other applications, the map is a key component of Australia’s earthquake loading code AS1170.4. In this paper we provide a brief history of national earthquake hazard models in Australia, with a focus on the map used in AS1170.4, and provide an overview of the proposed changes for the new maps. The revision takes advantage of significant improvements in both the data sets and models used for earthquake hazard assessment in Australia since the original map was produced. These include:  Earthquake observations up to and including 2010  Improved methods of declustering earthquake catalogues and calculating earthquake recurrence  Ground-motion prediction equations (i.e. attenuation equations) based on response spectral acceleration rather than peak ground velocity, peak ground acceleration or intensity-based relations.  Revised earthquake source zones  Improved maximum magnitude earthquake estimates based on palaeoseismology  The use of open source software for undertaking probabilistic seismic hazard assessment which promotes testability and repeatability The following papers in this series will address in more detail the changes to the earthquake catalogue, earthquake recurrence and ground motion prediction equations proposed for use in the draft map. The draft hazard maps themselves are presented in the final paper.

This service shows the draft MS 4 Basin Data as provided by San Bernardino County Dept. of Public Works.

This is spatial data illustrating the draft proposed extent and location of Settlement Area Boundary Expansions (SABEs) that are required to accommodate the Region’s population and employment forecasts to 2051. Please note: The urban boundary expansions depicted on this mapping do not represent a staff recommendation or a Council position, and have no Planning Act status.

The files linked to this reference are the geospatial data created as part of the completion of the baseline vegetation inventory project for the NPS park unit. Current format is ArcGIS file geodatabase but older formats may exist as shapefiles. To produce the digital map, a combination of 1:12,000-scale ortho imagery acquired in 2003, 2004, and 2005 and all of the GPS-referenced ground data were used to interpret the complex patterns of vegetation and land-use. All imagery was acquired from the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Farm Service Agency’s Aerial Photography Field Office and the National Agriculture Imagery Program. In the end, 32 map units (13 vegetated and 19 land-use) were developed and directly cross-walked or matched to corresponding plant associations and land-use classes. All of the interpreted and remotely sensed data were converted to Geographic Information System (GIS) databases using ArcGIS© software. Draft maps were printed, field tested, reviewed, and revised. One hundred-twenty four accuracy assessment (AA) data points were collected in 2006 and used to determine the map’s accuracy. After final revisions, the accuracy assessment revealed an overall thematic accuracy of 89%. Project Size = 6,784 acres San Antonio Missions National Historical Park = 844 acres Map Classes = 32 13 Vegetated 19 Non-vegetated Minimum Mapping Unit = ½ hectare is the program standard but this was modified at SAAN to ¼ acre. Total Size = 1,122 Polygons Average Polygon Size = 6 acres Overall Thematic Accuracy = 89%

State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality staff have developed this draft map to graphically display the waterbody assessments in the proposed 2024 Integrated Report. The Integrated Report combines the Clean Water Act section 305(b) water quality assessment and the section 303(d) list of impaired waters into one report that describes the water quality of California’s lakes, rivers, beaches, and other aquatic ecosystems. This draft map shows assessments for 305(b) categorization, including waterbody-pollutant combinations proposed for placement on the 303(d) list of impaired waters. The map also shows assessments from the 2020-2022 Integrated Report, which has been approved by U.S. EPA and is California’s current Integrated Report. This draft 2024 map will be finalized once the 2024 Integrated Report has been approved by U.S. EPA.

Note, this web application and associated layers should be used for informational purposes only.

Map Layers:

2024 Integrated Report Lines: Spatial representation of the assessed linear waterbodies in California, such as streams, rivers, and beaches. 2024 Integrated Report Polygons: Spatial representation of the non-linear (polygon) waterbodies in California, such as bays, lakes, and reservoirs.

Download Shapefiles at the following links:Draft 2024 Integrated Report LinesDraft 2024 Integrated Report Polygons

Pop Up Description:

Waterbody ID: Unique identifier for each mapped waterbody in the Integrated Report. Waterbody Name: Name of the waterbody. Waterbody Type: Type of water (river, lake, estuary, etc.) Regional Board: The Regional Water Quality Control Board with jurisdiction over the waterbody. WB Size: Approximate size of the waterbody and the corresponding unit of measurement. WB Category: Integrated Report Category for the waterbody, as proposed for the 2024 Integrated Report. County: County where waterbody is located. Listing Status: Waterbodies with one or more 303(d) listings in the proposed 2024 Integrated Report are noted as "listed." Waterbodies with no 303(d) listings in the proposed 2024 Integrated Report are notes as "not listed." Proposed 2024 New Listings: Pollutants proposed for the listing on the 303(d) list for the 2024 Integrated Report. The Decision ID in parentheses corresponds to the Decision ID in the linked Waterbody Fact Sheet (below). Proposed 2024 New Delistings: Pollutants proposed for delisting from the 303(d) list for the 2024 Integrated Report. The Decision ID in parentheses corresponds to the Decision ID in the linked Waterbody Fact Sheet. 2020-2022 Pollutants Listed: Pollutants listed on the 303(d) list of the 2020-2022 Integrated Report. Waterbody Fact Sheet: Link to the complete waterbody fact sheet with assessment details, including Decisions and Lines of Evidence (LOEs).

This is the FEMA draft flood hazard layer for Tompkins County. This layer differs from the existing Q3 100-Year flood zone and 500-year flood zone, in that they were developed in the 1970s and 1980s as paper maps. Those paper maps were digitized in 1996 and as such the depicted data may be inaccurate. Further, the Q3 flood zone maps are based on a vertical datum (base measurement points from which elevations are determined) called NGVD29 which is no longer utilized. This draft flood layer now utilizes a more accurate datum, NAVD88.

(Note: Updated inundation maps for 1:2 to 1:1000 floods are available from Alberta Environment and Parks (2020). The new draft maps can be viewed here: https://floods.alberta.ca/?app_code=FI&mapType=Draft) These inundation maps show whether a property is at risk for various sized river floods. The size of flood shown on this map has a 1/35 or a 2.9% chance of occurring in any year. The three distinct types of inundation shown on the maps are: o Inundation - Area flooded overland due to riverbank overtopping. o Isolated - Low lying areas that will not be wet from riverbank overtopping, but may experience groundwater seepage or stormwater backup. o Protected - Area protected by a permanent flood barrier. The flood areas shown are based on Alberta Environment and Parks most recent (2020) inundation maps. There is uncertainty inherent in predicting the effects of flood events, and this uncertainty increases for floods with less than a 1% chance of occurrence in any year. Any use of this data must recognizing the uncertainty with regards to the exact location and extent of flooding. More information on flood mapping for Calgary is available at https://calgary.ca/flood For Calgary's River Flood story, see: https://maps.calgary.ca/RiverFlooding/