New York State registered water well drillers are required to submit completion reports documenting where wells have been drilled, the specifications of those wells, and any subsequent work performed on those wells. Data regarding water wells has been collected since April 2000 as required by ECL 15-1525. Completion reports for the wells are added as they become available. Historical wells are added as the wells are mapped. Well locations are generally accurate to the parcel scale but may not represent the exact location on the property.Service layer is updated annually, and last updated 02/18/2025.For more information see https://dec.ny.gov/environmental-protection/water/water-quantity/water-well-contractor-program1. The NYS DEC asks to be credited in derived products.2. Secondary Distribution of the data is not allowed.3. Any documentation provided is an integral part of the data set. Failure to use the documentation in conjunction with the digital data constitutes misuse of the data.4. Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information, errors may be reflected in the data supplied. The user must be aware of data conditions and bear responsibility for the appropriate use of the information with respect to possible errors, original map scale, collection methodology, currency of data, and other conditions.

This dataset provides information submitted by well contractors as prescribed by Regulation 903, and is stored in the Water Well Information System (WWIS). Spatial information for all of the well records reported in Ontario are also provided. Well record map *[WWIS]: Water Well Information System This data is related to: * Well records * Map: Well records * Topic: Drinking water * Law: Reg. 903: Wells Related data: * Petroleum wells

This is the 2022 version of the Aquifer Risk Map. The 2021 version of the Aquifer Risk Map is available here.This aquifer risk map is developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing raw source groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding. This is the final 2022 map based upon feedback received from the 2021 map. A summary of methodology updates to the 2022 map can be found here.This map displays raw source groundwater quality risk per square mile section. The water quality data is based on depth-filtered, declustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells. The process used to create this map is described in the 2022 Aquifer Risk Map Methodology document. Data processing scripts are available on GitHub. Download/export links are provided in this app under the Data Download widget.This draft version was last updated December 1, 2021. Water quality risk: This layer contains summarized water quality risk per square mile section and well point. The section water quality risk is determined by analyzing the long-tern (20-year) section average and the maximum recent (within 5 years) result for all sampled contaminants. These values are compared to the MCL and sections with values above the MCL are “high risk”, sections with values within 80%-100% of the MCL are “medium risk” and sections with values below 80% of the MCL are “low risk”. The specific contaminants above or close to the MCL are listed as well. The water quality data is based on depth-filtered, de-clustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells.Individual contaminants: This layer shows de-clustered water quality data for arsenic, nitrate, 1,2,3-trichloropropane, uranium, and hexavalent chromium per square mile section. Domestic Well Density: This layer shows the count of domestic well records per square mile. The domestic well density per square mile is based on well completion report data from the Department of Water Resources Online System for Well Completion Reports, with records drilled prior to 1970 removed and records of “destruction” removed.State Small Water Systems: This layer displays point locations for state small water systems based on location data from the Division of Drinking Water.Public Water System Boundaries: This layer displays the approximate service boundaries for public water systems based on location data from the Division of Drinking Water.Reference layers: This layer contains several reference boundaries, including boundaries of CV-SALTS basins with their priority status, Groundwater Sustainability Agency boundaries, census block group boundaries, county boundaries, and groundwater unit boundaries. ArcGIS Web Application

This data set represents predicted nitrate concentration in ground water used for drinking, in milligrams per liter, in the conterminous United States, and was generated by a national nonlinear regression model based on 14 input parameters. Nolan and Hitt (2006) developed two national models to predict contamination of ground water by nonpoint sources of nitrate. The nonlinear approach to national-scale Ground-WAter Vulnerability Assessment (GWAVA) uses components representing nitrogen (N) sources, transport, and attenuation. One model (GWAVA-S) predicts nitrate contamination of shallow (typically less than 5 meters deep), recently recharged ground water, which may or may not be used for drinking. The other (GWAVA-DW) predicts ambient nitrate concentration in deeper supplies used for drinking. This data set is a national map of nitrate concentration (in milligrams per liter) in U.S ground water used for drinking as predicted by the GWAVA-DW model. The data set is one of 14 spatial data sets (1 output data set and 13 input data sets) associated with the GWAVA-DW model. Full details of the model development are in Nolan and Hitt (2006). This data set represents the model output, which is depicted in figure 3 of Nolan and Hitt (2006) that shows predicted nitrate concentration in milligrams per liter in ground water used for drinking. The model results can be used to indicate areas of the Nation that may be vulnerable to nitrate contamination. For inputs to the model, spatial attributes representing 13 nitrogen loading and transport and attenuation factors were compiled as raster data sets (1-km by 1-km grid cell size) for the conterminous United States (see table 1). >Table 1.-- Parameters of nonlinear regression model for > nitrate in ground water used for drinking (GWAVA-DW) > and corresponding input spatial data sets. > [kg, kilograms; km2, square kilometers.] > >Nitrogen Source Factors Data Set Name > 1 farm fertilizer (kg/hectare) gwava-dw_ffer > 2 confined manure (kg/hectare) gwava-dw_conf > 3 orchards/vineyards (percent) gwava-dw_orvi > 4 population density (people/km2) gwava-dw_popd > >Transport to Aquifer Factors > 5 water input (km2/cm) gwava-dw_wtin > 6 glacial till (yes/no) gwava-dw_gtil > 7 semiconsolidated sand aquifers gwava-dw_semc > (yes/no) > 8 sandstone and carbonate rocks gwava-dw_sscb > (yes/no) > 9 drainage ditch (km2) gwava-dw_ddit > 10 Hortonian overland flow gwava-dw_hor > (percent of streamflow) > >Attenuation Factors > 11 fresh surface water withdrawal gwava-dw_swus > for irrigation (megaliters/day) > 12 irrigation tailwater recovery (km2) gwava-dw_twre > 13 Dunne overland flow gwava-dw_dun > (percent of streamflow) > 14 well depth (meters) - "Farm fertilizer" is the average annual nitrogen input from commercial fertilizer applied to agricultural lands, 1992-2001, in kilograms per hectare. "Confined manure" is the average annual nitrogen input from confined animal manure, 1992 and 1997, in kilograms per hectare. "Orchards/vineyards" is the percent of orchards/vineyards land cover classification. "Population density" is 1990 block group population density, in people per square kilometer. "Water input" is the ratio of the total area of irrigated land to precipitation, in square kilometers per centimeter. "Glacial till" is the presence or absence of poorly sorted glacial till east of the Rocky Mountains. "Semiconsolidated sand aquifers" is the presence or absence of semiconsolidated sand aquifers. "Sandstone and carbonate rocks" is the presence or absence of sandstone and carbonate rock aquifers. "Drainage ditch" is the area of National Resources Inventory surface drainage, field ditch conservation practice, in square kilometers. "Hortonian overland flow" is infiltration excess overland flow estimated by TOPMODEL, in percent of streamflow. "Fresh surface water withdrawal for irrigation" is the amount of fresh surface water withdrawal for irrigation, in megaliters per day. "Irrigation tailwater recovery" is the area of National Resources Inventory irrigation system, tailwater recovery conservation practice, in square kilometers. "Dunne overland flow" is saturation overland flow estimated by TOPMODEL, in percent of streamflow. "Well depth" is the depth of the well, in meters. Well depth was not compiled as a spatial data set. Well depth equals 50 meters for the model simulation being presented. Reference cited: Nolan, B.T. and Hitt, K.J., 2006, Vulnerability of shallow ground water and drinking-water wells to nitrate in the United States: Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 24, pages 7834-7840.

The Aquifer Risk Map Web Tool contains all archived maps, including this 2023 Aquifer Risk Map.The Aquifer Risk Map is developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 (Monning, 2019) and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the map is made available to the public and updated annually starting January 1, 2021. This web map is part of the 2023 Aquifer Risk Map. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding.

This web map includes the following layers:Water Quality Risk: water quality risk estimates per square mile section for all contaminants with an MCL. Water quality risk is listed as “high” (average or recent concentration in section is above MCL for one or more contaminants), “medium” (average or recent concentration in section is between 80% - 100% of MCL for one or more contaminants), “low” (average or recent concentration in section is less than 80% of MCL for all measured contaminants) or “unknown” (no water quality data available in section).Individual Contaminant Risk: water quality risk estimates for nitrate, arsenic, 1,2,3-trichloropropane, hexavalent chromium, and uranium per square mile section.State Small Water Systems (DDW): state small water systems (5-14 connections) location from the Division of Drinking Water joined with water quality risk section estimates from the 2023 Aquifer Risk Map.Domestic Well Records (OSWCR): the approximate count and location of domestic well completion reports submitted to the Department of Water Resources. This is used as a proxy to identify domestic well locations.Public Water System Boundaries (DDW): the approximate boundaries of public drinking water systems, from the Division of Drinking Water. For reference only.Census Areas: Census block groups and census tract boundaries containing demographic information from the 2021 American Community Survey (B19013 Median Household Income and B03002 race/ethnicity) joined with summarized water quality risk estimates from the 2023 Aquifer Risk Map (count of high risk domestic wells and state small water systems per census area).Reference Boundaries: Various geographic boundaries including counties, basins, GSA’s, CV-SALTS basin prioritization status, Disadvantaged Community (DAC) status, and legislative boundaries. For reference only.CalEnviroScreen 4.0: CalEnviroScreen scores from OEHHA. For reference only.Groundwater Level Percentiles (DWR): Groundwater depth in various monitoring wells compared to the historic average at that well. For reference only.

The water quality risk is based on depth-filtered, de-clustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells. The methodology used to determine water quality risk is outlined here. For more information about the SAFER program, please email SAFER@waterboards.ca.gov. For technical questions or feedback on the map please email GAMA@waterboards.ca.gov.

This feature class consists of points describing well locations and is an excerpt from King County GIS data for Group A and Group B community water supply wells downloaded from the King County GIS Data Portal on July 15, 2016, within and in the immediate vicinity of the City of Bellevue. Group B wells were cross-referenced with state Department of Health Office of Drinking Water Sentry Internet data which provides summary information pertaining to public Water Systems. AESI removed one water system that was listed as inactive (water system ID 13107). This feature class is part of Appendix C, GIS Files and Documentation, of the Infiltration Infeasibility Analysis and Technical Report, prepared for the City of Bellevue Utilities Department by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc, April 4, 2016.

In this dataset we present two maps that estimate the location and population served by domestic wells in the contiguous United States. The first methodology, called the “Block Group Method” or BGM, builds upon the original block-group data from the 1990 census (the last time the U.S. Census queried the population regarding their source of water) by incorporating higher resolution census block data. The second methodology, called the “Road-Enhanced Method” or REM, refines the locations by using a buffer expansion and shrinkage technique along roadways to define areas where domestic wells exist. The fundamental assumption with this method is that houses (and therefore domestic wells) are located near a named road. The results are presented as two nationally consistent domestic-well population datasets. While both methods can be considered valid, the REM map is more precise in locating domestic wells; the REM map had a smaller amount of spatial bias (nearly equal vs biased in type 1 erro ...

This data release contains data used to develop models and maps that estimate the occurrence of lithium in groundwater used as drinking water throughout the conterminous United States. An extreme gradient boosting model was developed to estimate the most probable lithium concentration category (≤4, >4 to ≤10, >10 to ≤30 or >30 µg/L). The model uses lithium concentration data from wells located throughout the conterminous United States and predictor variables that are available as geospatial data. The model is included in this data release in the zipped folder named Model_Archive and was used to produce maps that are also included in this data release. The model input data (predictor variables) that were used to make the maps are within a zipped folder (Map_Input_Data.zip) that contains 20 tif-raster files, one for each model predictor variable. The map probability estimates that are outputs from the model are in a zipped folder (Map_Output_Data.zip) that contains 10 tif-raster files, two model estimate maps for each of the lithium concentration categories and the category with the highest probability for public supply well depths and domestic supply well depths.

The aquifer risk map is being developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding.Methodology for the draft aquifer risk map available for download.Water quality risk: This layer contains summarized water quality risk per census block group, square mile section, and well point. The overall census block group water quality risk is based on four risk factors (the count of chemicals with a long-term average (20 year) or recent result (within 2 years) above the MCL, the count of chemicals with a long-term average (20 year) or recent result (within 2 years) within 80% of the MCL, the average magnitude or results above the MCL, and the percent area with chemicals above the MCL or within 80% of the MCL). The specific chemicals that contribute to these risk factors are listed as well. Higher values for each individual risk factor contribute to a higher overall score. The scores are converted to percentiles to normalize the results. The water quality data is based on depth-filtered, declustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells, collected following a similar methodology as the Domestic Well Needs Assessment White Paper. This layer also displays the total estimated count of domestic wells per census block group, based on the Department of Water Resources Online System for Well Completion Reports, and the total estimated count of domestic well user population, based on the United States Geological Survey Road-Enhanced Methodology (Johnson and Belitz, 2019). To provide comments or feedback on this map, please email SAFER@waterboards.ca.gov or Emily.Houlihan@Waterboards.ca.gov. Individual chemicals: This layer shows declustered water quality data for arsenic, nitrate, 1,2,3-trichloropropane, uranium, and hexavalent chromium per square mile section. The intent of the aquifer risk map is to help prioritize areas where domestic well users and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL) and will be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The section water quality data is based on depth-filtered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells, collected following a similar methodology as the Domestic Well Needs Assessment White Paper. This layer contains the long-term average (20 years) as well as the count of recent results (within 2 years) above the MCL, between 80% - 100% of the MCL, and below 80% of the MCL for each square mile section. Drinking water users: This layer shows the locations of state small water systems and domestic well density. The state small water system locations were collected by the Rural Community Assistance Corporation. The locations are approximate and may not exactly represent well locations or service boundaries. The domestic well density per square mile is based on well completion report data from the Department of Water Resources Online System for Well Completion Reports. This layer also contains the public water system boundaries (available on the State Water Board REST endpoint) for reference.Reference layers: This layer contains several reference boundaries, including boundaries of CV-SALTS basins with their priority status, Groundwater Sustainability Agency boundaries, census block group boundaries, county boundaries, and groundwater unit boundaries.

This is the map image layer. The feature layer is available here.The aquifer risk map is being developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. This layer is part of the 2022 Aquifer Risk Map. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding.This layer contains summarized water quality risk per square mile section and per well point. The water quality risk is based on depth-filtered, de-clustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells for all contaminants with an MCL (plus hexavalent chromium). The methodology used to determine water quality risk is outlined here. To provide comments or feedback on this map, please email SAFER@waterboards.ca.gov or Emily.Houlihan@Waterboards.ca.gov.

Well lithology records in this layer come from the Department of Environmental Conservation's Water Supply Data Composite. Managed by the Water Resources Section in the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division, these database reports contain borehole lithology records submitted by Vermont licensed well drillers. Lithologic logs may contain information such as descriptions of materials encountered (e.g., sand, clay, rock, etc.), depth to bedrock, water bearing zones, etc. Data are reported in feet below ground surface. Licensed well drillers have been required to submit well completion reports on a form prepared by the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources for each well drilled or modified to the State since 1966. Well tags have been required since 1986. NOTE: the data contained herein are only as accurate as what was submitted to the State of Vermont by licensed well drillers; many wells have been completed but not reported, many reports have missing information, were recorded inaccurately, or poorly located geographically. Data are updated daily.Private Wells from the Well Completion Report Database can be found here: Private Wells

The aquifer risk map is being developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding. This layer contains summarized water quality risk per census block group, square mile section, and well point. The overall census block group water quality risk is based on five risk factors (1. the count of chemicals with a long-term average (20 year) or recent result (within 2 years) above the MCL, 2. the count of chemicals with a long-term average (20 year) or recent result (within 2 years) within 80% of the MCL, 3. the average magnitude or results above the MCL, 4. the percent area with chemicals above the MCL, and 5. the percent area with chemicals within 80% of the MCL). The specific chemicals that contribute to these risk factors are listed as well. Higher values for each individual risk factor contribute to a higher overall score. The scores are converted to percentiles to normalize the results. Higher percentiles indicate higher water quality risk. The water quality data is based on depth-filtered, de-clustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells, collected following a similar methodology as the Domestic Well Needs Assessment White Paper. The methodology used to calculate the risk percentiles is outlined in the Aquifer Risk Map Methodology. To provide comments or feedback on this map, please email SAFER@waterboards.ca.gov or Emily.Houlihan@Waterboards.ca.gov.Methodology for the draft aquifer risk map available for download.

Well capture zones are intended to identify potential areas of risk to aquifers where the release of contaminants could affect the water quality of community wells. The information was compiled as a discreet project under the 'Yukon Water Strategy' and represents a 'snapshot in time' of the Drinking Water Systems. Well capture zones were identified using a combination of buffers, analytical methods, and groundwater flow modelling using the Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc. Visual MODFLOW. Distributed from GeoYukon by the Government of Yukon . Discover more digital map data and interactive maps from Yukon's digital map data collection. For more information: geomatics.help@yukon.ca

*The data for this dataset is updated daily. The date(s) displayed in the details section on our Open Data Portal is based on the last date the metadata was updated and not the refresh date of the data itself.*The purpose of the Private Well Survey was to document the occurrence of non-point sources of ground water contamination to protect drinking water supplies. The Florida Department of Health (DOH) laboratory and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) continued this project for eleven years (1986-1997). The Private Well Survey results were compiled by county and summarized. County data included maps of well locations that were estimated by map interpolation. In some cases, well locations have been updated with differentially corrected GPS information.

This hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83. A wellhead protection area (WHPA) is the portion of an aquifer through which groundwater moves to a well. Under the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Program approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 1990, DEM is responsible for delineating a WHPA for each of the public wells in the state. DEM contracted with the GZA Consulting to delineate select non-community stratified drift wells using analytical modeling and hydrogeologic mapping.As of August 2013, the Rhode Island Department of Health Office of Drinking Water Quality (HEALTH) is responsible for delineating the Calculated Fixed Radius WHPA's for bedrock wells, based on the pump rate of the well. Non-Transient Non-Community Well - regularly serves at least 25 of the same persons (not residents) over 6 months of the year. Examples include wells serving schools and places of employment. Transient Non-Community Well - does not regularly serve the same persons, but does serve at least 25 people at least 60 days of hte year. DEM relied on technical input from the Wellhead Protection Program Advisory Committee in developing the delineation methodology. A mapping approach was required that was scientifically defensible, could be applied consistently across the state, and could be applied with the resources available to DEM. The delineations are based on reasonably available information regarding the hydrogeologic environment and the well characteristics. The WHPAs were delineated using the US Geological Survey quadrangle maps at a scale of 1:24000. WHPA maps are available for review at the DEM Office of Water Resources, on the DEM web page at www.dem.ri.gov/maps, and on the Rhode Island Geographic Information System webpage at www.rigis.org.

This hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83. "Recharge area" means the land surface from which water is added to the zone of saturation. The recharge area for a particular well or aquifer, for instance, is that land surface from which water moves to the well or aquifer or may move to the well or aquifer under certain hydraulic conditions.Drinking water protection AUTHORITY: These Rules and Regulations are adopted in accordance with Chapter 42-35 pursuant to Chapters 46-12, 46-13.1, 23-18.9, 23-19.1, 42-17.6 and 42-17.1 of the Rhode Island General Laws of 1956, as amended. The intention of this dataset was to provide an overview of areas intended to be protected drinking water sources in Rhode Island

This Well Completion Report dataset represents an index of records from the California Department of Water Resources' (DWR) Online System for Well Completion Reports (OSWCR). This dataset is for informational purposes only. All attribute values should be verified by reviewing the original Well Completion Report. Known issues include: - Missing and duplicate records - Missing values (either missing on original Well Completion Report, or not key entered into database) - Incorrect values (e.g. incorrect Latitude, Longitude, Record Type, Planned Use, Total Completed Depth) - Limited spatial resolution: The majority of well completion reports have been spatially registered to the center of the 1x1 mile Public Land Survey System section that the well is located in.

The Ground Water Contamination Areas GIS layer is a statewide map showing the boundaries of delineated areas of known groundwater contamination pursuant to Chapter 62-524, F.A.C., New Potable Water Well Permitting In Delineated Areas. 38 Florida counties have been delineated primarily for the agricultural pesticide ethylene dibromide (EDB), and to a much lesser extent, volatile organic and petroleum contaminants. This GIS layer represents approximately 427,897 acres in 38 counties in Florida that have been delineated for groundwater contamination. However, it does not represent all known sources of groundwater contamination for the state of Florida.

This GIS layer consists of the geographic location of active and inactive public (Community, non-transient non-community and transient non-community) water sources labeled by the Water System Identification Number (WSID) and source number (i.e. WL001 or IN002). The water source data and locations are drawn from the State Drinking Water database (SDWIS). The water sources are wells, springs and surface water intakes that predate regulations developed in the 1970s to the present.
SDWIS is the repository for state and federal information collected from and about each public water system in Vermont, including bulk and bottled water facilities along with water production and water quality data. "For information regarding attributes of Public Water Source feature layers, please download the:Public Water Sources Data Dictionary

See full Data Guide here.Ground Water Classifications Polygon:

Ground Water Quality Classifications is a polygon feature-based layer compiled at 1:24,000 scale that includes water quality classification information for groundwaters for all areas of the State of Connecticut. Ground Waters means waters flowing through earth materials beneath the ground surface and the Ground Water Quality Classifications is a designation of the use of the ground waters. The Ground Water Quality Classifications is based primarily on the Adopted Water Quality Classifications Map sheets with information collected and compiled from 1986 to 1997 by major drainage basin. The maps were hand-drawn at 1:50,000-scale in ink on Mylar which had been underprinted with a USGS topographic map base. The digital layer includes ground water water quality classifications. It does not include water quality classifications for ground waters below surface waterbodies. Surface Water Quality Classifications are defined separately in a set of data layers comprised of line and polygon features. The Ground Water Quality Classifications and the Surface Water Quality Classifications are usually presented together as a depiction of water quality classifications in Connecticut. The Ground Water Quality Classes are GA, GAA, GAAs, GB and GC. Classes GAA and GA designate areas of existing or potential drinking water. All ground waters not otherwise classified are considered as Class GA. Class GAAs is for ground water that is tributary to a public water supply reservoir. Class GB is used where ground water is not suitable for drinking water. Class GC is used for assimilation of permitted discharges. Modified classes GA-Impaired, GAA-Impaired, GAA-Well-Impaired, GAA-Well and GA-NY are found in the data layer to categorize special cases of GA or GAA that may not be meeting the goal (impaired), surround public water supply wells (Well) or contribute to a public water supply watershed for another state (NY). There are three elements that make up the Water Quality Standards which is an important element in Connecticut's clean water program. The first of these is the Standards themselves. The Standards set an overall policy for management of water quality in accordance with the directive of Section 22a-426 of the Connecticut General Statutes. In simple terms the policies can be summarized by saying that the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection shall: Protect surface and ground waters from degradation, Segregate waters used for drinking from those that play a role in waste assimilation, Restore surface waters that have been used for waste assimilation to conditions suitable for fishing and swimming, Restore degraded ground water to protect existing and designated uses, Provide a framework for establishing priorities for pollution abatement and State funding for clean up, Adopt standards that promote the State's economy in harmony with the environment. The second element is the Criteria, the descriptive and numerical standards that describe the allowable parameters and goals for the various water quality classifications. The final element is the Classification Maps that show the Class assigned to each surface and groundwater resource throughout the State. These maps also show the goals for the water resources, and in that manner provide a blueprint and set of priorities for Connecticut's efforts to restore water quality. Although federal law requires adoption of Water Quality Standards for surface waters, Water Quality Standards for ground waters are not subject to federal review and approval. Connecticut's Standards recognize that surface and ground waters are interrelated and address the issue of competing use of ground waters for drinking and for waste water assimilation. These Standards specifically identify ground water quality goals, designated uses and those measures necessary for protection of public and private drinking water supplies; the principal use of Connecticut ground waters. These three elements comprise the Water Quality Standards and are adopted using the public participation procedures contained in Section 22a-426 of the Connecticut General Statutes. The Standards, Criteria and Maps are reviewed and revised roughly every three years. Any change is considered a revision requiring public participation. The public participation process consists of public meetings held at various locations around the State, notification of all chief elected officials, notice in the Connecticut Law Journal and a public hearing. The Classification Maps are the subject of separate public hearings which are held for the adoption of the map covering each major drainage basin in the State. The Water Quality Standards and Criteria documents are available on the DEEP website, www.ct.gov/deep. The Ground and Surface Water Quality Classifications do not represent conditions at any one particular point in time. During the conversion from a manually maintained to a digitally maintained statewide data layer the Housatonic River and Southwest Coastal Basins information was updated. The publication date of the digital data reflects the official adoption date of the most recent Water Quality Classifications. Within the data layer the adoption dates are: Housatonic and Southwest Basins - March 1999, Connecticut and South Central Basins - February 1993, Thames and Southeast Basins - December 1986. This data is updated.