12 datasets found
  1. Shoreline Data Rescue Project of Duncan Canal, Alaska, PH6627

    • datasets.ai
    • fisheries.noaa.gov
    • +1more
    0, 21, 33
    Updated Oct 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce (2023). Shoreline Data Rescue Project of Duncan Canal, Alaska, PH6627 [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/shoreline-data-rescue-project-of-duncan-canal-alaska-ph66271
    Explore at:
    33, 0, 21Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.noaa.gov/
    Authors
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce
    Area covered
    Alaska, Duncan Canal
    Description

    These data were automated to provide an accurate high-resolution historical shoreline of Duncan Canal, Alaska suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. These data are derived from shoreline maps that were produced by the NOAA National Ocean Service including its predecessor agencies which were based on an office interpretation of imagery and/or field survey. The NGS attribution scheme 'Coastal Cartographic Object Attribute Source Table (C-COAST)' was developed to conform the attribution of various sources of shoreline data into one attribution catalog. C-COAST is not a recognized standard, but was influenced by the International Hydrographic Organization's S-57 Object-Attribute standard so the data would be more accurately translated into S-57. This resource is a member of https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39808

  2. a

    Nome City Limits

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 24, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nome_GIS (2020). Nome City Limits [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/3f87257ff52740cb93b3dbee183b4496_0/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Nome_GIS
    Area covered
    Description

    City Limits of Nome, Alaska, based on boundaries on record at the State of Alaska Local Boundary Commission. Boundaries downloaded from DNR site did not reflect official boundary on record with LBC. Redrawn by Duncan GIS using Certificate on file with LBC, dated November 26, 1982. When calculating Lat-long coordinates, assumed WGS72 due to date of Certificate preceding WGS84.

  3. a

    Aerial Imagery of a Study Site Within Big Jacks Creek Wilderness Area Near...

    • geocatalog-uidaho.hub.arcgis.com
    • idaho-epscor-gem3-uidaho.hub.arcgis.com
    • +3more
    Updated Aug 25, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    University of Idaho (2022). Aerial Imagery of a Study Site Within Big Jacks Creek Wilderness Area Near Duncan Saddle, ID (August 2021, 1-cm) [Dataset]. https://geocatalog-uidaho.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/4b1f729eb17a4193ad0fdac23f6a56a2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 25, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    University of Idaho
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This collection contains 1 2021 1-centimeter natural color orthorectified image of Duncan Saddle, Idaho. This study area is approximately one hour south of Mountain Home, Idaho in the Big Jacks Creek Wilderness Area (Owyhee County). These data were acquired August 20, 2021. These data are sourced from US NSF Idaho EPSCOR.These data are part of a larger collection (README.txt) of UAS imagery data and data products collected at Duncan Saddle, approximately one hour south of Mountain Home, Idaho. We used a DJI Mavic 2 Pro with Map Pilot Pro software to capture imagery over the area of interest. The imagery was collected in a crossgrid pattern at 44m above ground level; the resulting imagery have a ground resolution of 1cm/pixel. The images were processed and the products created in Agisoft Metashape Pro. All products are georectified and in WGS84 UTM Zone 12 N.Recommended Citation: Roser, A., Marie, V., Olsoy, P., Delparte, D., & Caughlin, T. T. (2022). Unoccupied aerial systems imagery from Duncan Saddle Idaho (Version 1.0) [Data set]. University of Idaho. https://doi.org/10.7923/S6Q0-1V41Individual image tiles can be downloaded using the Idaho Imagery Explorer.These data can be bulk downloaded from a web accessible folder.Data are sourced from: https://doi.org/10.7923/S6Q0-1V41

  4. H

    Dead Run RHESSys Workflow with supplied GIS data preparation

    • hydroshare.org
    • search.dataone.org
    zip
    Updated Jan 10, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lorne Leonard; Lawrence Band; Brian Miles; Laurence Lin; Jon Duncan; Charles Scaife; John Lovette (2017). Dead Run RHESSys Workflow with supplied GIS data preparation [Dataset]. https://www.hydroshare.org/resource/fd653c45ee614ae282b9e56a3abdd01f
    Explore at:
    zip(15.1 KB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 10, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    HydroShare
    Authors
    Lorne Leonard; Lawrence Band; Brian Miles; Laurence Lin; Jon Duncan; Charles Scaife; John Lovette
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Dead Run RHESSys Workflow with supplied GIS data preparation

    RHESSysWorkflows provides a series of Python tools for performing RHESSys data preparation workflows. These tools build on the workflow system defined by EcohydroLib and RHESSysWorkflows. This notebook assumes data steps 1 to 13 have already been prepared and uploaded as a HydroShare resource.

    This notebook focuses on general steps 14 to 19 using the Dead Run catchment. 14 Generate template 15 Create world 16 Create flow table 17 Initializing vegetation carbon and nitrogen stores 18 Creating a RHESSys TEC file 19 Running RHESSys models

    Users interested in seeing step outputs, remove output = from the command line.

  5. Seabed morphology and geomorphology of the Coral Sea Marine Park,...

    • ecat.ga.gov.au
    • researchdata.edu.au
    esri: map service +3
    Updated Jun 26, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) (2023). Seabed morphology and geomorphology of the Coral Sea Marine Park, north-eastern Australia - Version 1 [Dataset]. https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/api/records/30892ff0-9859-46f5-849e-0ac2aeb5b8c7
    Explore at:
    www:link-1.0-http--link, ogc:wfs, ogc:wms, esri: map serviceAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 26, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Geoscience Australiahttp://ga.gov.au/
    Seabed morphology and geomorphology of the Coral Sea Marine Park, north-eastern Australia - Version 1
    Area covered
    Description
    This data product contains geospatial seabed morphology and geomorphology information for Flinders Reefs and Cairns Seamount (Coral Sea Marine Park). These maps are intended for use by marine park managers, regulators, the general public and other stakeholders. A nationally consistent two-part (two-step) seabed geomorphology classification system was used to map and classify the distribution of key seabed features.

    In step 1, semi-automated GIS mapping tools (GA-SaMMT; Huang et al., 2022; eCat Record 146832) were applied to a bathymetry digital elevation model (DEM) in a GIS environment (ESRI ArcGIS Pro) to map polygon extents (topographic high, low, and planar) and to quantitatively characterise their geometries. Their geometric attributes were then used to classify each shape into discrete Morphology Feature types (Part 1: Dove et al., 2020; eCat Record 144305). In step 2, the seabed geomorphology was interpreted by applying additional datasets and domain knowledge to inform their geomorphic characterisation (Part 2: Nanson et al., 2023; eCat Record 147818). Where available, backscatter intensity, seabed imagery, seabed sediment samples and sub-bottom profiles supplemented the bathymetry DEM and morphology classifications to inform the geomorphic interpretations.

    The Flinders Reefs seabed morphology and geomorphology maps were derived from an 8 m horizontal resolution bathymetry DEM compiled from multibeam surveys (FK200429/GA4861: Beaman et al., 2020; FK200802/GA0365: Brooke et al, 2020), Laser Airborne Depth Sounder (LADS), Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and bathymetry supplied by the Australian Hydrographic Office.

    A subset of the FK200802/GA0365 multibeam survey was gridded at 1 m horizontal resolution to derive the key morphology and geomorphology features at the top of Cairns Seamount (-35 to -66 m; within the upper mesophotic zone).

    The data product and application schema are fully described in the accompanying Data Product Specification.

    Beaman, R., Duncan, P., Smith, D., Rais, K., Siwabessy, P.J.W., Spinoccia, M. 2020. Visioning the Coral Sea Marine Park bathymetry survey (FK200429/GA4861). Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/140048; GA eCat record 140048

    Brooke, B., Nichol, S., Beaman, R. 2020. Seamounts, Canyons and Reefs of the Coral Sea bathymetry survey (FK200802/GA0365). Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/144385; GA eCat record 144385

    Dove, D., Nanson, R., Bjarnadóttir, L. R., Guinan, J., Gafeira, J., Post, A., Dolan, Margaret F.J., Stewart, H., Arosio, R., Scott, G. (2020). A two-part seabed geomorphology classification scheme (v.2); Part 1: morphology features glossary. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4075248; GA eCat Record 144305

    Huang, Z., Nanson, R. and Nichol, S. (2022). Geoscience Australia's Semi-automated Morphological Mapping Tools (GA-SaMMT) for Seabed Characterisation. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/146832; GA eCat Record 146832

    Nanson, R., Arosio, R., Gafeira, J., McNeil, M., Dove, D., Bjarnadóttir, L., Dolan, M., Guinan, J., Post, A., Webb, J., Nichol, S. (2023). A two-part seabed geomorphology classification scheme; Part 2: Geomorphology classification framework and glossary (Version 1.0) (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7804019; GA eCat Record 147818
  6. f

    Scores for English territorial waters marine bird species’ population risk...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gareth Bradbury; Mark Trinder; Bob Furness; Alex N. Banks; Richard W. G. Caldow; Duncan Hume (2023). Scores for English territorial waters marine bird species’ population risk due to displacement by offshore wind farms, ranked by species score. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106366.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Gareth Bradbury; Mark Trinder; Bob Furness; Alex N. Banks; Richard W. G. Caldow; Duncan Hume
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Scores for English territorial waters marine bird species’ population risk due to displacement by offshore wind farms, ranked by species score.

  7. d

    ArcGIS python script model

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Oct 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alexandra Kosiba; James Duncan (2024). ArcGIS python script model [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/p1312.ds2636
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Forest Ecosystem Monitoring Cooperative
    Authors
    Alexandra Kosiba; James Duncan
    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 2018 - Nov 1, 2018
    Variables measured
    No Attributes
    Description

    A python script model to be used with ArcGIS (10.5.1) to produce statistics based on stream riparian buffers and projected hemlock losses (USFS 2018).

  8. Data from: Networks of (Dis)connection: Mobility Practices, Tertiary...

    • tandf.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gemma Davies; John Dixon; Colin G. Tredoux; J. Duncan Whyatt; Jonny J. Huck; Brendan Sturgeon; Bree T. Hocking; Neil Jarman; Dominic Bryan (2023). Networks of (Dis)connection: Mobility Practices, Tertiary Streets, and Sectarian Divisions in North Belfast [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8204297.v1
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Taylor & Francishttps://taylorandfrancis.com/
    Authors
    Gemma Davies; John Dixon; Colin G. Tredoux; J. Duncan Whyatt; Jonny J. Huck; Brendan Sturgeon; Bree T. Hocking; Neil Jarman; Dominic Bryan
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Belfast North, Belfast
    Description

    Long-standing tensions between Protestant and Catholic communities in Northern Ireland have led to high levels of segregation. This article explores the spaces within which residents of north Belfast move within everyday life and the extent to which these are influenced by segregation. We focus in particular on the role that interconnecting tertiary streets have on patterns of mobility. We adapt Grannis’s (1998) concept to define T-communities from sets of interconnecting tertiary streets within north Belfast. These are combined with more than 6,000 Global Positioning System (GPS) tracks collected from local residents to assess the amount of time spent within different spaces. Spaces are divided into areas of residents’ own community affiliations (in-group), areas not clearly associated with either community (mixed), or areas of opposing community affiliation (out-group). We further differentiate space as being either within a T-community or along a section of main road. Our work extends research on T-communities by expanding their role beyond exploring residential preference, to explore, instead, networks of (dis)connection through which social divisions are expressed via everyday mobility practices. We conclude that residents are significantly less likely to move within mixed and out-group areas and that this is especially true within T-communities. It is also evident that residents are more likely to travel along out-group sections of a main road if they are in a vehicle and that women show no greater likelihood than men to move within out-group space. Evidence from GPS tracks also provides insights into some areas where mixing appears to occur. Key Words: GIS, Northern Ireland, postconflict, segregation, T-communities.

  9. f

    Scores for species’ population vulnerability to collision mortality at...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gareth Bradbury; Mark Trinder; Bob Furness; Alex N. Banks; Richard W. G. Caldow; Duncan Hume (2023). Scores for species’ population vulnerability to collision mortality at offshore wind turbines, with species ranked by overall score. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106366.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Gareth Bradbury; Mark Trinder; Bob Furness; Alex N. Banks; Richard W. G. Caldow; Duncan Hume
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Scores for species’ population vulnerability to collision mortality at offshore wind turbines, with species ranked by overall score.

  10. Scores used in assessing sensitivity of seabird species to collision and...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gareth Bradbury; Mark Trinder; Bob Furness; Alex N. Banks; Richard W. G. Caldow; Duncan Hume (2023). Scores used in assessing sensitivity of seabird species to collision and displacement/disturbance risks from offshore wind farms in English territorial waters. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106366.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Gareth Bradbury; Mark Trinder; Bob Furness; Alex N. Banks; Richard W. G. Caldow; Duncan Hume
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    a = score for highest percent of biogeographic population in England in any season;b = adult survival score;c = UK threat status score;d = Birds Directive score;e = estimated percentage at blade height;f = flight manoeuvrability;g = percentage of time spent flying;h = nocturnal activity;i = disturbance susceptibility;j = habitat specialization.Scores used in assessing sensitivity of seabird species to collision and displacement/disturbance risks from offshore wind farms in English territorial waters.

  11. World Population Density

    • directrelief.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated May 20, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Direct Relief (2020). World Population Density [Dataset]. https://directrelief.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/DirectRelief::world-population-density
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Direct Reliefhttp://directrelief.org/
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    World,
    Description

    This layer was created by Duncan Smith and based on work by the European Commission JRC and CIESIN. A description from his website follows:--------------------A brilliant new dataset produced by the European Commission JRC and CIESIN Columbia University was recently released- the Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL). This is the first time that detailed and comprehensive population density and built-up area for the world has been available as open data. As usual, my first thought was to make an interactive map, now online at- http://luminocity3d.org/WorldPopDen/The World Population Density map is exploratory, as the dataset is very rich and new, and I am also testing out new methods for navigating statistics at both national and city scales on this site. There are clearly many applications of this data in understanding urban geographies at different scales, urban development, sustainability and change over time.

  12. a

    Oklahoma Geological Survey Geology

    • home-owrb.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 14, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oklahoma Water Resources Board (2016). Oklahoma Geological Survey Geology [Dataset]. https://home-owrb.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/oklahoma-geological-survey-geology
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 14, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Oklahoma Water Resources Boardhttps://web.archive.org/web/20090723021315/http://www.owrb.ok.gov/
    Area covered
    Description

    This digital dataset shows quadrangles published by the Oklahoma Geological Survey (OGS) and was subjectively altered from the original datasets where there were overlaps, gaps, and errant polygons. The central Oklahoma dataset represents a composite of 25 geologic quadrangles showing the outcrop of rock units that comprise the Garber Sandstone, Wellington Formation, Hennessey and Duncan Formations as well as alluvium and terrace deposits. The dataset for western, north-central, and south-central Oklahoma represents a composite of 20 geologic quadrangles showing the outcrop of rock units that comprise the aquifers in this region of the state.

  13. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce (2023). Shoreline Data Rescue Project of Duncan Canal, Alaska, PH6627 [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/shoreline-data-rescue-project-of-duncan-canal-alaska-ph66271
Organization logoOrganization logo

Shoreline Data Rescue Project of Duncan Canal, Alaska, PH6627

Explore at:
33, 0, 21Available download formats
Dataset updated
Oct 2, 2023
Dataset provided by
United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.noaa.gov/
Authors
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce
Area covered
Alaska, Duncan Canal
Description

These data were automated to provide an accurate high-resolution historical shoreline of Duncan Canal, Alaska suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. These data are derived from shoreline maps that were produced by the NOAA National Ocean Service including its predecessor agencies which were based on an office interpretation of imagery and/or field survey. The NGS attribution scheme 'Coastal Cartographic Object Attribute Source Table (C-COAST)' was developed to conform the attribution of various sources of shoreline data into one attribution catalog. C-COAST is not a recognized standard, but was influenced by the International Hydrographic Organization's S-57 Object-Attribute standard so the data would be more accurately translated into S-57. This resource is a member of https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/39808

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu