11 datasets found
  1. Data from: Estimates of species-level tolerance of urban habitat in North...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Jun 15, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rachel Fanelli; Paul Martin; Orin Robinson; Frances Bonier (2022). Estimates of species-level tolerance of urban habitat in North American birds [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19182503.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Rachel Fanelli; Paul Martin; Orin Robinson; Frances Bonier
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The R script and input files needed to run code for generating species urban tolerance estimates, statistical analyses, and plots. A Readme file describing input file content is also included. These data are associated with the manuscript, "Estimates of species-level tolerance of urban habitat in North American birds". Fanelli R.E., P.R. Martin, O.J. Robinson, F. Bonier. 2022. Ecology.

  2. 2021_2022_E4_EBIRD_23spp_SEASONAL_BirdDistribution_WMV_hosts

    • zenodo.org
    zip
    Updated May 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    William Wint; William Wint; Roya Olyazadeh; Roya Olyazadeh (2024). 2021_2022_E4_EBIRD_23spp_SEASONAL_BirdDistribution_WMV_hosts [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11083232
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    William Wint; William Wint; Roya Olyazadeh; Roya Olyazadeh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2021 - 2022
    Description

    This dataset has been requested for 'the Horizon e4Warning project on mapping and modelling West Nile Virus Disease and its Hosts' then been downloaded from ebird.org and it includes weekly abundance geospatial tifs for for 2021 and 2022 for 23 species:

    1. weekly presence
    2. weekly species richness
    3. week abundance sum

    Data obtained from Ebird https://science.ebird.org/en/status-and-trends/species/

    Species Names:

    SpeciesEnglish Namefilname code
    Alcedo atthisCommon Kingfishercomkin1
    Anas platyrhynchosMallardmallar3
    Anser anserGraylag Gosegragoo
    Athene noctuaLittle Owllitowl1
    Bulbulcus ibisCattle Egretcategr
    Buteo buteoCommon Buzzardcombuz1
    Columba palumbusCommin Wood Piegoncowpig
    Corvus cornixHooded Crowhoocro1
    Corvus corone cornixCarrion Crowcarcro1
    Corvus monedulaEurasian Jackdaweurjac
    Cyanistes caeruleusBlue Titblutit
    Egretta garzetta(Little Egret)litegr
    Eremophila alpestrisHorned Larkhorlar
    Falco tinnunculusEurasian Kestreleurkes
    Garrulus glandariusEurasian Jayeurja1
    Hirundo rusticaBarn Swallowbarswa
    Larus argentatusHerring Gullhergul
    Lulua arboreaWoodlarkwoolar1
    Luscinia LusciniaThrush Nightinglaethrnig1
    Luscinia megarhynchosCommon nightingalecomnig1
    Passer domesticus (including Passer italiae and Passer hispaniolensis)House Sparrowhouspa
    Pica picaEurasian Magpieeurmag1
    Streptopelia decaoctoEurasian Collared Doveeucdov
    Turdus merulaEurasian Blackbirdeurbla

    File Names:

    a) e4ebirdwnvhostsweeklyabundance all weekly abundance datasets at 3km resolution.
    b) e4ebirdwnvhostweeklyPA abundance with missing recoded to 0. This is based of ad hoc checks of weekly datasets against the birdlife species ranges, which suggest that the maximum extents of combined weekly abundance distributions match the rage boundares fairly well
    c) e4ebirdspprichnessallSUMMEANweekly summed and mean weekly presence absence for all species. If a species in missing a weekly dataset it is removed from the Mean value calculations for that week. To maintaing a constant maximum presenxe number in the summed number of present species, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first avaiklable distribution after the gap
    d) calcsumabundallweeks weekly sum of abundance of 23 spp. As there qare some gaps for various species this is an interim product.. When divided by the nunber of species summed (see below) it provides an index of collective abundnace of the 23 host spp
    e) meanallabundallweeks weekly summed abundnace divided by number species summed (acounts for gaps indata) . Only NOData if no species recorded

  3. d

    Data from: Leveraging the strengths of citizen science and structured...

    • search.dataone.org
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrew Stillman; Paige Howell; Guthrie Zimmerman; Emily Bjerre; Brian A. Millsap; Orin Robinson; Daniel Fink; Erica Stuber; Viviana Ruiz-Gutierrez (2025). Leveraging the strengths of citizen science and structured surveys to achieve scalable inference on population size [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dfn2z357x
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Andrew Stillman; Paige Howell; Guthrie Zimmerman; Emily Bjerre; Brian A. Millsap; Orin Robinson; Daniel Fink; Erica Stuber; Viviana Ruiz-Gutierrez
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2023
    Description

    Population size is a key metric for management and policy decisions, yet wildlife monitoring programs are often limited by the spatial and temporal scope of surveys. In these cases, citizen science data may provide complementary information at higher resolution and greater extent. We present a case study demonstrating how data from the eBird citizen science program can be combined with regional monitoring efforts by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to produce high-resolution estimates of golden eagle abundance. We developed a model that uses aerial survey data from the western United States to calibrate high-resolution annual estimates of relative abundance from eBird. Using this model, we compared regional population size estimates based on the calibrated eBird information to those based on aerial survey data alone. Population size estimates based on the calibrated eBird information had strong correspondence to estimates from aerial survey data in two out of four regions, and popula..., , , # Leveraging the strengths of citizen science and structured surveys to achieve scalable inference on population size

    https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.dfn2z357x

    Description of the data and file structure

    This file contains information and explanation for the data and code that accompany the following project: Stillman, A.N., P.E. Howell, G.S. Zimmerman, E.R. Bjerre, B.A. Millsap, O.J. Robinson, D. Fink, E.F. Stuber, and V. Ruiz-Gutierrez. 2023. Leveraging the strengths of citizen science and structured surveys to achieve scalable inference on population size. Journal of Applied Ecology.

    This .README file accompanies the archived data for this project. Two files marked with the word "Script:" provide R code for two Bayesian models described in the main text. Two files marked with the word "Dataset:" provide the necessary data to run the models. Data from the eBird Status and Trends program are freely available online from the Cornell Lab of...

  4. f

    Wildfire smoke influences the probability of observing breeding birds in New...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Jul 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Festus Adegbola; Stuart Evans; Adam M Wilson; Olivia Sanderfoot (2025). Wildfire smoke influences the probability of observing breeding birds in New York State [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29565662.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Festus Adegbola; Stuart Evans; Adam M Wilson; Olivia Sanderfoot
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    New York
    Description

    Wildfires are a common natural disturbance, forging and reshaping ecosystems around the world. With 7.2 million acres of land burned annually in the United States, most research on the impacts of wildfires on birds and other wildlife has focused on how animals respond to the loss and transformation of habitat. However, direct impacts of wildfires extend far beyond the burn perimeter. Smoke from wildfires can be transported hundreds of miles, exposing birds to toxic air across a large geographic area. Yet, research on the impacts of wildfire smoke on wild birds is extremely limited. Quantifying the relationship between wildfire smoke and bird detection is a critical first step in assessing the broader ecological impacts of smoke disturbance. In this study, we assess how fine particulate matter (PM2.5), a well-established marker of wildfire smoke and important pollutant, influences the probability of observing birds in New York, USA, during the 2021–2023 wildfire seasons. We used generalized linear mixed models to model bird observations from 98,960 eBird checklists to local measurements using daily mean concentration of PM2.5. After accounting for habitat, time of day, weather, seasonality, and survey effort, we found that PM2.5 affected the probability of observing 70% (55 of 84) study species. Of the total 84 study species, 18% (15 species) had a positive interaction with increased PM2.5 concentration, while 48% (40 species) had a negative interaction with PM2.5 concentration. Our findings demonstrate that wildfire smoke influences the probability of observing birds, likely due to species-specific behavioral responses to smoke pollution. Furthermore, our results support previous research suggesting that wildfire smoke (and air pollution in general) is an important and underexplored component of the detection process; failing to account for the effect air quality may bias models of species distributions and abundance. As climate change continues to escalate global wildfire activity, it is critical to understand how birds will be impacted by more frequent and intense smoke pollution. Our study provides insights into which species may be most vulnerable to acute smoke exposure and guide conservation action in the Pyrocene.

  5. Upland Forest Birds (SECAS Goal Trends)

    • gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 13, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2024). Upland Forest Birds (SECAS Goal Trends) [Dataset]. https://gis-fws.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/upland-forest-birds-secas-goal-trends
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 13, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.fws.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Area covered
    Description

    Yearly trend When averaged across all points with trends, upland forest bird abundance increased by 0.98% per year from 2012-2022. Species used were cerulean warbler, Louisiana waterthrush, wood thrush, and worm-eating warbler. These species are Regional Species of Greatest Conservation Need for states in the Southeast, primarily occur in this ecosystem, and have sufficient data for trend analysis in eBird Status and Trends. Trends varied across the Southeast, with the biggest declines occurring in the Central Hardwoods, Appalachians, and northeast part of the Southeast Coastal Plain Bird Conservation Regions. For two widespread species, points were mostly increasing: wood thrush (91% increasing) and Louisiana waterthrush (64% increasing). For two species with smaller ranges in the Southeast, points were mostly declining: cerulean warbler (78% declining) and worm-eating warbler (78% declining). Breeding Bird Survey trends, which cover more coarse areas, also show similar patterns. On track to meet SECAS goal Yes. The increase of about 3.92% every 4 years is greater than the SECAS goal of a 1% increase every 4 years. Data source eBird Status and Trends Confidence in trend Low. Less than half of the points that were increasing (38%) were statistically significant. Interpretation This is an indicator of both local and landscape conditions across the upland forest ecosystem. Upland hardwood birds benefit from conversion of historic grassland and savanna ecosystems into closed canopy forest. In areas with increases, that may mean increases in closed canopy forest overall are offsetting the negative impacts of land use changes like greater forest fragmentation. Some areas of upland forest bird decline, like Southeast Missouri, could actually be positive signs of conservation overall as these areas are restored to the more open forest types that historically occurred there.

    Species-specific trends also highlight how more widespread generalist species (Louisiana waterthrush, wood thrush) seem to be poised to take advantage of changing landscape conditions. More specialist and range-limited species (cerulean warbler, worm-eating warbler) seem to be less able to take advantage of these changes. Based on range-wide trends for these species, it doesn’t appear that climate change is a major driver of trends during this time period. It’s also important to note that all these species are neotropical migrants. Threats to survival during migration (e.g., communication towers) and on their wintering grounds (e.g., habitat loss) are likely also impacting population trends. Other information available A table of state-level summaries for each species, a map by Bird Conservation Region (BCR), and tabular data associated with the chart above are available in Appendix I of the pdf report: https://secassoutheast.org/pdf/SECAS-goal-report-2024.pdf.

  6. Total biomass, abundance and species richness of nocturally migrating...

    • figshare.com
    application/gzip
    Updated Jan 26, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wee Hao Ng; Daniel Fink; Frank La Sorte; Tom Auer; Wesley Hochachka; Alison Johnston; Adriaan Dokter (2022). Total biomass, abundance and species richness of nocturally migrating landbirds in North America [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15085275.v1
    Explore at:
    application/gzipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 26, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Wee Hao Ng; Daniel Fink; Frank La Sorte; Tom Auer; Wesley Hochachka; Alison Johnston; Adriaan Dokter
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Data related to the manuscript: Continental-scale biomass redistribution by migratory birds in response to seasonal variation in productivity, accepted for publication in Global Ecology and Biogeography. DOI of article to be provided later.Data included:- Biomass and abundance estimates from the interpolation models, fitted using the 2016 eBird Reference Dataset (Fink et al., 2017).- Species richness estimates, based on the eBird Status and Trends occurrence maps (eBird S&T; Fink et al., 2020b).- EVI estimates, extracted from those used in La Sorte & Graham (2021).- Estimates of bioclimatic variables, extracted from the WorldClim database (WorldClim version 2.1; Fick & Hijmans, 2017).All data are in the RData format. See "readme.txt" for details.

  7. Z

    2021_2022_E4_EBIRD_30spp_SEASONAL_BirdDistribution_WMV_hosts

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jun 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Olyazadeh, Roya (2024). 2021_2022_E4_EBIRD_30spp_SEASONAL_BirdDistribution_WMV_hosts [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_11083231
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Olyazadeh, Roya
    Wint, William
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Abstract

    A series of weekly bird abundance distribution datasets is now available from EBIRD (https://science.ebird.org/en/status-and-trends). ERGO has processed these data in several tranches to provide weekly species richness and weekly aggregated abundance indices at 3km resolution. Data for thirty species have now been processed. These species have been selected as being West Nile Virus hosts, using literature search, inference from mosquito WNV vector blood meals and from bird serology reports. The two tranches are a) all 30 selected species and b) the top 15 E4Warning priority species . Details are provided in the accompanying Excel Spreadsheet (e4ebird readmeJune24.xls).

    Description

    This dataset has been requested for 'the Horizon e4Warning project on mapping and modelling West Nile Virus Disease and its Hosts' then been downloaded from ebird.org and it includes weekly abundance geospatial tifs for 30 species:

    weekly presence

    weekly species richness

    week abundance sum

    Data obtained from Ebird https://science.ebird.org/en/status-and-trends/species/

    Species Names:

    Species English Name filname code

    Alcedo atthis Common Kingfisher comkin1

    Anas platyrhynchos Mallard mallar3

    Anser anser Graylag Gose gragoo

    Athene noctua Little Owl litowl1

    Bulbulcus ibis Cattle Egret categr

    Buteo buteo Common Buzzard combuz1

    Columba palumbus Commin Wood Piegon cowpig

    Corvus cornix Hooded Crow hoocro1

    Corvus corone cornix Carrion Crow carcro1

    Corvus monedula Eurasian Jackdaw eurjac

    Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit blutit

    Egretta garzetta (Little Egret) litegr

    Eremophila alpestris Horned Lark horlar

    Falco tinnunculus Eurasian Kestrel eurkes

    Garrulus glandarius Eurasian Jay eurjay1

    Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow barswa

    Larus argentatus Herring Gull hergul

    Lulua arborea Woodlark woolar1

    Luscinia Luscinia Thrush Nightinglae thrnig1

    Luscinia megarhynchos Common nightingale comnig1

    Passer domesticus (including Passer italiae and Passer hispaniolensis) House Sparrow houspa

    Pica pica Eurasian Magpie eurmag1

    Streptopelia decaocto Eurasian Collared Dove eucdov

    Turdus merula Eurasian Blackbird eurbla

    Ciconia ciconia White Stork whisto1

    Sturnus vulgaris European Starling eursta

    Sylvia atricapilla Eurasian Bl;ackcap blackc1

    Acrocephalus scirpaceus Common Reed Warbler eurwar1

    Fulica atra Eurasian Coot eurcoo

    Columba livia Rock Pigeon rocpig

    Gallus gallus Domestic chicken

    File Names:

    a) e4ebirdabundanceall30weeklyJune24 All weekly abundance datasets for 30 availablke spp at 3km resolution, June 24

    b) e4ebirdPAall30weeklyJune24 Presence absence with missing recoded to 0 for all 30 species available in June 24. This recoding is based of ad hoc checks of weekly datasets against the birdlife species ranges, which suggest that the maximum extents of combined weekly abundance distributions match the rage boundares fairly well

    c) e4ebirdspprichnessall23SUMMEANweeklyFeb24 Summed and mean weekly presence absence for 23 available species calc Feb24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap

    d) e4ebirdspprichnesse415SUMMEANweeklyJun24 Summed and mean weekly presence absence for e4 15 priority species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap

    e) e4ebirdspprichnessall30SUMMEANweeklyJun24 Summed and mean weekly presence absence for 30 available species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap

    f) e4ebirdabundanceall30summeanweekJun24 Summed and mean weekly median abundance for 30 available species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap

    g) e4ebirdeabundance415summeanweekJun24 Summed and mean weekly median abundance for e4 15 priority species calc June 24. If a species in missing a weekly dataset, missing weeks are filled with last valid presence week up to halfway through the gap in availability, then with the first available distribution after the gap

  8. a

    Forested Wetland Birds Map (SECAS Goal Trends)

    • secas-fws.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 12, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2024). Forested Wetland Birds Map (SECAS Goal Trends) [Dataset]. https://secas-fws.hub.arcgis.com/items/706631548c2d41fdbc4f0f6636ffdaf3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Area covered
    Description

    Yearly trendWhen averaged across all points with trends, forest wetland bird abundance increased by 2.85% per year from 2012-2022. Species used were prothonotary warbler, Swainson's warbler, swallow-tailed kite, and yellow-throated warbler. These species are Regional Species of Greatest Conservation Need for states in the Southeast, primarily occur in this ecosystem, and have sufficient data for trend analysis in eBird Status and Trends. Most points across the SECAS region were increasing. Declines were mostly in areas experiencing major impacts from sea-level rise. Individual species trends also followed this pattern. Breeding Bird Survey trends, which cover more coarse areas, also show similar patterns.On track to meet SECAS goalYes. The increase of about 11.4% every 4 years is greater than the SECAS goal of a 1% increase every 4 years.Data sourceeBird Status and TrendsConfidence in trendMedium. Most of the points (57%) that were on track for the goal were statistically significant.InterpretationThis is an indicator of both local and landscape conditions across the forested wetland ecosystem. While there are some declines, especially in areas impacted by sea-level rise, overall, forested wetland birds appear to be on track to meet the SECAS goal. This may be due to the extensive conservation investments in forested wetlands, policies restricting wetland development, and growing interest from urban communities in protecting water supply and reducing flood risks.Other information availableA table of state-level summaries for each species, a map by Bird Conservation Region (BCR), and tabular data associated with the chart above are available in Appendix I of the pdf report: https://secassoutheast.org/pdf/SECAS-goal-report-2024.pdf.

  9. Data from: Feeding en route: Prey availability and traits influence prey...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +2more
    bin, csv, zip
    Updated May 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ryan Bourbour; Cody Aylward; Timothy Meehan; Breanna Martinico; Mary Badger; Mary Badger; Alisha Goodbla; Allen Fish; Teresa Ely; Christopher Brigg; Elisha Hull; Ryan Bourbour; Cody Aylward; Timothy Meehan; Breanna Martinico; Alisha Goodbla; Allen Fish; Teresa Ely; Christopher Brigg; Elisha Hull (2024). Data from: Feeding en route: Prey availability and traits influence prey selection by an avian predator on migration [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25338/b81w7d
    Explore at:
    csv, bin, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Ryan Bourbour; Cody Aylward; Timothy Meehan; Breanna Martinico; Mary Badger; Mary Badger; Alisha Goodbla; Allen Fish; Teresa Ely; Christopher Brigg; Elisha Hull; Ryan Bourbour; Cody Aylward; Timothy Meehan; Breanna Martinico; Alisha Goodbla; Allen Fish; Teresa Ely; Christopher Brigg; Elisha Hull
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Measurement technique
    <p><strong>Predator Diet Sampling</strong></p> <p>The Marin Headlands hosts the most significant raptor migration flight along the Pacific Coast of North America where migrating raptors funnel and converge before gaining altitude to cross the San Francisco Bay (Goodrich & Smith, 2008). We collected diet data from raptors banded at a raptor migration monitoring station located in the Marin Headlands operated by the Golden Gate Raptor Observatory/Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy in cooperation with the US National Park Service (37.8262°N, 122.4997°W; Fig. 1). Sharp-shinned hawks were lured into the sampling site with rock doves Columba livia, European starlings Sturnus vulgaris, and house sparrows Passer domesticus, then captured in dho-ghazzas, mist-nets, or bownets, and released after banding and processing (Hull & Bloom, 2001).</p> <p>We collected eDNA samples from the exterior surfaces of beaks and talons of sharp-shinned hawks (n= 588; Fig. 2) during fall migration in 2015 (n=282) and 2016 (n=276) from September through November. To sample prey DNA, we moistened a sterile histobrush (#25‐2188 Puritan Medical Products Company) in 0.7ml ultrapure water contained in 1.5ml pop-top centrifuge tube. Next, we gently swabbed the entire exterior surface of the upper and lower mandible, targeting any visible prey blood or tissue if present. We avoided contact with interior mouthparts and saliva to minimize collection of predator DNA. We then swabbed the entire surface of each talon, targeting visible prey blood, tissue, or feathers if present. Toe pads or scales were additionally swabbed if visible prey remains were present. After swabbing the raptor, we cut off the nylon brush tip into a 1.5ml screw‐top centrifuge tube containing 0.7ml Longmire's lysis buffer (100mM Tris pH8.0, 100mM EDTA, 10mM NaCl, 0.5% SDS, 0.2% sodium azide) or Queen's lysis buffer (100mM Tris, 100mM NaCl, 100mM sodium EDTA and 10% n-Lauroylsarcosine, pH 8.0; Suetin et al., 1991) and stored at −20°C. Sampling occurred even if beaks and talons appeared clean (Bourbour et al., 2019, 2021).</p> <p>We conducted all aspects of this research in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; permit #: CA_GOGA_Ely_Raptors_2020.A3), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (California State Permit #: SCP 13739), National Parks Service (study #: GOGA-00004; permit #: GOGA-2022-SCI-0019), and United States Geological Service guidelines (federal bird banding permit #: 21827).</p> <p><strong>Prey DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing</strong></p> <p>We used QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN Inc.) to extract prey DNA from swab tips. We conducted lab work in house at the UC Davis Genomic Variation Laboratory genetics lab that does not process songbird DNA to minimize risk of contamination. We targeted a 464-base pair (bp) amplicon region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene using primers COI-fsdF and COI-fsdR which have been demonstrated to have a high-resolution power for identifying species across Passeriformes and Columbiformes (González‐Varo et al., 2014; Bourbour et al., 2021). We modified the primers to have an overhang sequence that would anneal to indexed Illumina adapters (Illumina, 2013; Supplementary Materials Table 3). We tested primers using avian tissue samples from the Museum of Wildlife & Fish Biology at UC Davis. We used orange-crowned warbler Vermivora celata and Swainson's thrush Catharus ustulatus DNA as positive controls alongside negative controls (PCR-grade water) during library preparation to confirm detection of probable prey species and assess potential contamination or misassignment of reads. We followed the two-step PCR amplification protocol outlined in Illumina (2013), see Supplementary Materials 1 for detailed PCR protocols. After library preparation, we quantified DNA using Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with an FLx800 Fluorescence Reader (BioTek Instruments). We then normalized each sample post-Index PCR to 5ng/µl individually and pooled two libraries at a concentration of 5nM in 15µl of EB buffer (10mM TRIS; pH=8.0-8.4). We sequenced the libraries on two lanes using Illumina's MiSeq PE300 (v3) platform.</p> <p><strong>Reference Library and Bioinformatics</strong></p> <p>Developing custom reference sequence libraries can create more robust results by reducing overrepresented species and representing cryptic diversity (Elbrecht & Leese, 2017; Macheriotou et al., 2019). To start, we compiled a custom reference library of bird species (n=205) that range in the Pacific Flyway according to species account range maps (Billerman et al., 2022; see Supplementary Materials Tables 1,5). We used the R package PrimerMiner (Elbrecht & Leese, 2017) to download all publicly available COI barcode and mitochondrial genome sequences from NCBI and BOLD databases to take full advantage of full and partial sequences available for each species. Sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units using a 3% sequence similarity to reduce overrepresentation of sequences while capturing sequence variants representing cryptic diversity (Elbrecht & Leese, 2017). Out of 205 avian species, we were able to compile 199 species' barcode sequences for our reference library. We then manually reformatted the datafiles to be compatible with the reference database format used by the R package DADA2 (Callahan et al., 2016; Supplementary Materials 2).</p> <p>We filtered out low quality scores (<30) and reads below 250bp using the program Cutadapt (Martin, 2011) and used DADA2 to filter out samples with >2 erroneous base calls, remove chimeras, and merge forward and reverse reads. We matched all barcode sequences to our custom reference library with >99% bootstrap support using the 'assignTaxonomy' command in DADA2. Based on assessment of positive and negative controls, we removed prey species detections with <100 total assigned reads and we removed prey species if they represented 0.5% or less of the total number of reads in each individual sample.</p> <p><strong>Prey availability</strong></p> <p>To obtain an index of weekly prey availability, we extracted abundances of prey species from the eBird Status and Trends data from August–November using the R package ebirdst (Fink et al., 2020; Strimas-Mackey et al., 2021; eBird Status and Trend 2005 to 2020). The persistence of eDNA in the environment is variable and system dependent (e.g., Andruszkiewicz et al., 2017; Barnes et al., 2014; Strickler, 2015) and more studies are needed to determine the rate of degradation of eDNA in terrestrial ecosystems (Beng & Corlett, 2020). However, because prey DNA on beaks and talons represents diet from previous meals and may be detectable for multiple days on a migrating raptor (Bourbour et al., 2019; Bourbour et al., 2021; Valentin et al., 2021), prey abundance data was extracted from several counties north of the sampling site where sharp-shinned hawks likely occurred prior to their capture at the monitoring station as they follow the coastal mountains (Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Lake, and Mendocino; Fig. 1; Goodrich & Smith, 2008). For this process, we confined eBird data extraction in 2.96km2 spatial cells (which is the native resolution from eBird Status and Trends products; Fink et al., 2020) that also contained sharp-shinned hawk occurrence data according to eBird checklists in the defined study region. Next, we summed weekly relative abundances of prey species across those spatial cells to represent an index of prey availability in the study area.</p> <p><strong>Statistical analyses</strong></p> <p>We performed all statistical analyses using R version 4.1.0 (R Core Team, 2021) in RStudio version 2022.2.3 (RStudio Team, 2022). Because the eBird Status and Trends data uses data from 2005-2020 (Fink et al., 2020), we combined both diet sampling years together. We excluded European starling and house sparrow detections from statistical analyses because we cannot confidently rule out contamination at the sampling site as the cause of their detection (rock dove DNA was not detected; Bourbour et al., 2021). We calculated rarefaction and Coverage-based R/E (Type 3) curves with a 95% confidence interval using the R package iNext (Chao et al., 2014) to assess sampling effort. Because sharp-shinned hawk females are 30-40% larger than males (Bildstein et al., 2020), we first tested for differential prey size selection. We used a linear mixed-effects model with average prey mass (extracted from Tobias et al., 2022) as the dependent variable, sex as a categorical explanatory variable, and sample ID (individual hawk) as a random effect using the R packages lme4 (Bates et al., 2015), lmerTest (Kuznetsova et al., 2017), and afex (Singmann et al., 2022), and visualized the model using the R packages effects (Fox & Weisberg, 2019).</p> <p><strong>Prey traits</strong></p> <p>We categorized each species detected according to relative size, flocking behavior, and migratory tendency (Supplementary Table 1). For prey size, we used average mass (extracted from Tobias et al., 2022) to classify each species as small (<30g), medium (between 30g and 60 g), or large (>60g). For non-breeding flocking behavior, we used Billerman et al., (2022) to classify species as gregarious if they are described as highly social with conspecifics throughout fall migration, aggregate if described as joining small flocks during the non-breeding season, or solitary if the species is described as solitary and/or seldomly joining mixed-species flocks during migration. For migratory tendency, we used Billerman et al., (2022) to classify species as resident or migratory (i.e., which included both complete and partial migrants) in the Pacific Flyway.</p> <p><strong>Prey selection</strong></p> <p>We fitted separate models for male and female hawks given distinct body size differences and statistically significant differential prey size selection. For the models for each sex, we used a set of multinomial logistic regressions (discrete choice models) using the R package mlogit (Croissant, 2013). For each model, we computed the variance-covariance matrix of the parameters to account for repeated measures using the R package sandwich (Zeileis, 2006). These models were used to predict the probability that a species was detected on the migrating predator as a function of species availability and traits. We used prey detection as the dependent variable and included the following as explanatory variables: index of prey availability (from eBird Status and Trends Data), non-breeding flocking behavior, non-breeding habitat association, and migratory tendency. To visualize the diet composition and co-occurrence of selected prey species, we plotted the weekly relative abundances of prey species selected by both males and females over time along with the weekly proportion detected in the diet. We used the scale function in R to normalize (z-score) both eBird relative abundances and proportions in diet. Using the z-scores, we then calculated the Pearson's R for each of the top seven prey species to measure the correlation between the weekly proportions in diet and eBird prey availability indices (Freedman et al., 2007).</p>
    Description

    During animal migration, ephemeral communities of taxa at all trophic levels co-occur over space and time. The interactions between predators and prey along migration corridors are ecologically and evolutionarily significant. However, these interactions remain understudied in terrestrial systems and warrant further investigations using novel approaches. We investigated the predator-prey interactions between a migrating avivorous predator and ephemeral avian prey community in the fall migration season. We tested for associations between avian traits and prey selection and hypothesized that prey traits (i.e., relative size, flocking behavior, habitat, migration tendency, and availability) would influence prey selection by a sexually dimorphic raptor on migration. To document prey consumption, we sampled trace prey DNA from beaks and talons of migrating sharp-shinned hawks Accipiter striatus (n=588). We determined prey availability in the ephemeral avian community by extracting weekly abundance indices from eBird Status and Trends data. We used discrete choice models to assess prey selection and visualized frequency of prey in diet and availability on the landscape over the fall migration season. Using eDNA metabarcoding, we detected prey species on 94.1% of the hawks sampled (n=525/588) comprising 1396 prey species detections from 65 prey species. Prey frequency in diet and eBird relative abundance of prey species were correlated over the migration season for top selected prey species, suggesting prey availability is an important component of raptor-songbird interactions during fall. Prey size, flocking behavior, and non-breeding habitat association were prey traits that significantly influenced predator choice. We found differences between female and male hawk prey selection, suggesting that sexual size dimorphism has led to distinct foraging strategies on migration. This research integrated field data collected by a volunteer-powered raptor migration monitoring station and public-generated data from eBird to reveal elusive predator-prey dynamics occurring in an ephemeral raptor-songbird community during fall migration. Understanding dynamic raptor-songbird interactions along migration routes remains a relatively unexplored frontier in animal ecology and is necessary for conservation and management efforts of migratory and resident communities.

  10. Bayesian Generalized Linear Model for D1.1 Flyway Transmission

    • figshare.com
    xml
    Updated Jul 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Matthew Scotch (2025). Bayesian Generalized Linear Model for D1.1 Flyway Transmission [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29606432.v1
    Explore at:
    xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 20, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Matthew Scotch
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Generalized linear model via Bayesian phylogenetic inference to quantify the support for log-linear combination of predictors of D1.1 spread between North American flyways. The predictors include: USDA-confirmed wild bird HPAI cases – originUSDA-confirmed wild bird HPAI cases – destinationSpecies overlap between flyways (eBird data)Bordering flywaysThis file includes data from the eBird Status and Trends Project at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, eBird.org. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.

  11. Grassland & Savanna Birds Map (SECAS Goal Trends)

    • secas-fws.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2024). Grassland & Savanna Birds Map (SECAS Goal Trends) [Dataset]. https://secas-fws.hub.arcgis.com/items/c48abe9eba0b4c4abb118d183ae95ca1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 10, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Servicehttp://www.fws.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Area covered
    Description

    Yearly trendWhen averaged across all points with trends, grassland and savanna bird abundance declined by 2.2% per year from 2012-2022.Species used were American kestrel, Bachman's sparrow, Eastern meadowlark, grasshopper sparrow, Henslow's sparrow, LeConte's sparrow, loggerhead shrike, Northern Bobwhite, prairie warbler, red-cockaded woodpecker, and scissor-tailed flycatcher. These species are Regional Species of Greatest Conservation Need for states in the Southeast, primarily occur in this ecosystem, and have sufficient data for trend analysis in eBird Status and Trends. Most points across the SECAS region were declining. For most individual species, a majority of points were declining, but there were also a number of points with increases. Two species with most of their range in the longleaf pine ecosystem had a larger number of increasing points than other species: red-cockaded woodpecker (58% increasing) and Bachman’s sparrow (43% increasing). Breeding Bird Survey trends, which cover more coarse areas, also show similar patterns.On track to meet SECAS goalNo. The decline of about 8.8% every 4 years is not enough to meet the SECAS goal of a 1% increase every 4 years.Data sourceeBird Status and TrendsConfidence in trendMedium. Most of the points (65%) that were declining and off track for the goal were statistically significant.InterpretationThis is an indicator of both local and landscape conditions across the grassland and savanna ecosystem. Large declines across most of the region highlight the major problems for this ecosystem and the species that depend on it. Signs of improvement in the longleaf range, South Florida, the Chihuahuan Desert, the West Gulf Coastal Plain, and the Appalachians show that targeted conservation attention can still have an impact. Improvements in specific species like red-cockaded woodpecker and Bachman’s sparrow also show that targeted improvements in habitat quality can make a major difference.Other information availableA table of state-level summaries for each species, a map by Bird Conservation Region (BCR), and tabular data associated with the chart above are available in Appendix I of the pdf report: https://secassoutheast.org/pdf/SECAS-goal-report-2024.pdf.

  12. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Rachel Fanelli; Paul Martin; Orin Robinson; Frances Bonier (2022). Estimates of species-level tolerance of urban habitat in North American birds [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19182503.v1
Organization logo

Data from: Estimates of species-level tolerance of urban habitat in North American birds

Related Article
Explore at:
txtAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 15, 2022
Dataset provided by
Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
Authors
Rachel Fanelli; Paul Martin; Orin Robinson; Frances Bonier
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

The R script and input files needed to run code for generating species urban tolerance estimates, statistical analyses, and plots. A Readme file describing input file content is also included. These data are associated with the manuscript, "Estimates of species-level tolerance of urban habitat in North American birds". Fanelli R.E., P.R. Martin, O.J. Robinson, F. Bonier. 2022. Ecology.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu