The Economic Deprivation Index (EDI) is a measure of deprivation which is produced at Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA) level and is made up of two domains: Income and Employment. The EDI was produced in order to combat difficulties in comparing the Indices of Deprivation 2004 and 2007 as different methodologies were used. The EDI has been constructed in a consistent manner over time and can be used to track the progress of deprived neighbourhoods. This theme presents the score values for the EDI from 1999 to 2005. This data originates from Communities and Local Government, Economic Deprivation Index, 2008.

Economic Deprivation Index (EDI) is a deprivation index that has been produced using consistent methodology in order to track Income and Employment deprivation over time. The EDI provides consistent LSOA level scores for the ID Income and ID Employment domains for 2001-2005. Source: Communities and Local Government (CLG) Publisher: Communities and Local Government (CLG) Geographies: Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA), Local Authority District (LAD), County/Unitary Authority Geographic coverage: England Please note that this data has been superseded by the economic deprivation indices 1999-2009 available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/tracking-economic-and-child-income-deprivation-at-neighbourhood-level-in-england-1999-to-2009

WIMD is the Welsh Government’s official measure of relative deprivation for small areas in Wales. It is designed to identify those small areas where there are the highest concentrations of several different types of deprivation. As such, WIMD is a measure of multiple deprivation that is both an area-based measure and a measure of relative deprivation. WIMD ranks all small areas in Wales from 1 (most deprived) to 1,909 (least deprived). The Index has three main components: - The Index itself, which is a set of ranks; - The ranks of the eight types of deprivation, or domains, from which the overall Index is constructed; - The underlying indicators, which are directly measurable, and which are combined to create the domain ranks. Many, but not all, of the indicators are produced as rates. The units depend on what is being measured. All of these components are calculated for each of the LSOAs in Wales. The overall 2019 WIMD ranks and the ranks of the eight domains of deprivation are published on the StatsWales website. Where available, the underlying indicator data is now published annually on StatsWales.

Describes and presents key findings from analysis of the Economic Deprivation Index (EDI) and the Children in Income Deprived households Index (CIDI). The EDI and CIDI track levels of economic deprivation from 1999 to 2009 at Lower-level Super Output Area (LSOA) and Local Authority (LA) level. The EDI and CIDI complement the Indices of Deprivation 2010, as they allow changes over time to be measured on a consistent basis. Source agency: Communities and Local Government Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics Language: English Alternative title: Economic Deprivation Index Children in Income Deprived Households Index EDI CIDI

Author:Arup (using data derived from Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, previously named the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)Creation date:2023Date of source data harvest:2022Temporal coverage:2019Spatial Resolution:Lower Super Output Area (LSOA)Geometry:PolygonSource data URL:Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019Data terms of use:Open Government Licence v3 - Dataset can be shared openly for re-use for commercial and non-commercial purposes, with appropriate attribution.Data attribution:- Dataset processed by Arup as part of the West London sub-regional LAEP, 2023.- Office for National Statistics licensed under Open Government Licence v3.0.- Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right, 2023.- Contains Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government data licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.Workflow Diagram:Available: pngComments:The data and analysis developed for the sub-regional LAEP was undertaken using data available at the time and will need to be refined for a full Phase 2 LAEP.Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the quality and accuracy of the data, the Greater London Authority is not responsible for any inaccuracies and/or mistakes in the information provided.

Material deprivation rate for the 'Economic strain' and 'Durables' dimensions, by number of item of deprivation - EU-SILC survey

Living Conditions Survey (LCS): Persons aged 16 years old and over, with deprivation in a certain number of concepts, by relationship with economic activity. Annual. National.

Greece - Severe material deprivation rate was 14.00% in December of 2024, according to the EUROSTAT. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Greece - Severe material deprivation rate - last updated from the EUROSTAT on December of 2025. Historically, Greece - Severe material deprivation rate reached a record high of 21.50% in December of 2014 and a record low of 11.00% in December of 2009.

pone.0264811.t001 - Predictors of tuberculosis incidence and the effects of multiple deprivation indices on tuberculosis management in OR Tambo district over a 5-year period

The English Indices of Deprivation 2015 are based on 37 separate indicators, organised across seven distinct domains of deprivation which are combined, using appropriate weights, to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 (IMD 2015). This is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA), or neighbourhood, in England. Every such neighbourhood in England is ranked according to its level of deprivation relative to that of other areas.Source: MHCLG

field notes, workshop transcripts, emails pictures from action research work

A 5-year average (mean ± SD) notification of TB indicators by levels of socio-economic deprivation from 2009 to 2013.

The European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) collects timely and comparable multidimensional microdata on income, poverty, social exclusion and living conditions.

The EU-SILC collection is a key instrument for providing information required by the European Semester (_[1]) and the European Pillar of Social Rights, and the main source of data for microsimulation purposes and flash estimates of income distribution and poverty rates.

AROPE remains crucial to monitor European social policies, especially to monitor the EU 2030 target on poverty and social exclusion. For more information, please consult EU social indicators.

The EU-SILC instrument provides two types of data:

• Cross-sectional data pertaining to a given time or a certain time period with variables on income, poverty, social exclusion and other living conditions.
• Longitudinal data pertaining to individual-level changes over time, observed periodically over four‐or more year rotation scheme (Annex III (2) of 2019/1700).

EU-SILC collects:

• annual variables,
• three-yearly modules,
• six-yearly modules,
• ad-hoc new policy needs modules,
• optional variables.

The variables collected are grouped by topic and detailed topic and transmitted to Eurostat in four main files (D-File, H-File, R-File and P-file).

The domain ‘Income and Living Conditions’ covers the following topics: persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion, income inequality, income distribution and monetary poverty, living conditions, material deprivation, and EU-SILC ad-hoc modules, which are structured into collections of indicators on specific topics.

In 2023, in addition to annual data, in EU-SILC were collected: the three yearly module on labour market and housing, the six yearly module on intergenerational transmission of advantages and disadvantages, housing difficulties, and the ad hoc subject on households energy efficiency.

Starting from 2021 onwards, the EU quality reports use the structure of the Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS).

_{([1]) The European Semester is the European Union’s framework for the coordination and surveillance of economic and social policies.}

Living Conditions Survey (LCS): Persons aged 16 years old and over, with deprivation in a certain number of concepts (Europe 2020 Strategy), by relationship with economic activity. Annual. National.

Material deprivation for the 'Economic strain' dimension, by number of item of deprivation

Commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) on behalf of NHS England, this report includes analysis of 3,347 children who died in England between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2020 and investigates the characteristics of their deaths to identify if socio-economic deprivation is associated with childhood mortality.

Living Conditions Survey (LCS): Persons aged 16 years old and over with material deprivation, by relationship with economic activity. Annual. National.

The Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (CIMD) is an area-based index which used 2016 Census of Population microdata to measure four key dimensions of deprivation at the dissemination area (DA)-level: residential instability, economic dependency, situational vulnerability and ethno-cultural composition. Using factor analysis, DA-level factor scores were calculated for each dimension. Within a dimension, ordered scores were assigned a quintile value, 1 through 5, where 1 represents the least deprived and 5 represents the most deprived. The CIMD allows for an understanding of inequalities in various measures of health and social well-being. While it is a geographically-based index of deprivation and marginalization, it can also be used as a proxy for an individual. The CIMD has the potential to be widely used by researchers on a variety of topics related to socio-economic research. Other uses for the index may include: policy planning and evaluation, or resource allocation.

The collection "material deprivation" covers indicators relating to economic strain, durables, housing and environment of the dwelling. Severely materially deprived persons have living conditions severely constrained by a lack of resources, they experience at least 4 out of 9 following deprivations items: they cannot afford i) to pay rent or utility bills, ii) keep home adequately warm, iii) face unexpected expenses, iv) eat meat, fish or a protein equivalent every second day, v) a week holiday away from home, vi) a car, vii) a washing machine, viii) a colour TV, ix) a telephone.